REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 17

Fighting the Pathologizing of PMS

Despite a lack of evidence, the psychiatric establishment has made extreme premenstrual distress a recognized disorder -- and a boon to Big Pharma.
September 8, 2008  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Reproductive Justice headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 
Are you unhappy? Bloated? Is it hard to concentrate? Do you have food cravings? Breast tenderness?

If you read the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), published by the American Psychiatric Association, you will find your symptoms listed under "premenstrual dysphoric disorder" (PMDD). In other words, because of those symptoms, a therapist or doctor could label you as having a mental disorder.

The DSM is the bible of psychiatric diagnosis, used by nearly every hospital, clinic, doctor and insurance company, as well as Medicare and Medicaid. Since PMDD first was mentioned in the DSM in 1987, people have received the mistaken impression that it's real and that it's a mental illness. With the manual's fifth edition currently in preparation, that notion seems likely to be strengthened rather than discouraged.

Contrary to popular opinion, the creation and use of psychiatric categories is rarely based on solid science, as I learned when I served on two DSM committees. The absence of science leaves a void into which every conceivable kind of bias has been found to flow -- including sexism. The DSM's own PMDD committee reviewed more than 500 studies for the 1994 edition and concluded that no high-quality research supported the existence of PMDD, yet PMDD was placed in the manual anyway.

Do some women report feeling worse before their periods than at other times of the month? Certainly, although in some countries and cultures more than others. Premenstrual discomforts are also more often reported by women who were sexually abused as children, are struggling with abuse or harassment, or are just plain overburdened. But that is worlds away from a mental illness.

Two powerful DSM authors proposed adding PMDD in the mid-1980s and proposed adding it to the next edition of the manual. It would represent an extreme form of PMS -- the popularly accepted "syndrome" of physical and emotional symptoms between ovulation and menstruation. To qualify, it would have to include five familiar PMS-type symptoms, at least one of them a "mood disorder" such as feeling hopeless, "on edge," self-deprecating, irritable, angry or tearful. No one keeps comprehensive records of how often a PMDD diagnosis is given, but based on PMDD committee estimates, approximately half a million American women could be given the PMDD label.

Hundreds of researchers have tried unsuccessfully to prove that women are more likely to have mood problems premenstrually than at other times. University of British Columbia researcher Christine Hitchcock says, "Something like half of women say they have premenstrual problems, but when you ask them to keep daily ratings of their moods, the data don't reflect that." Another study showed that men identified PMDD symptoms in themselves as commonly as women did.

Despite this, when Eli Lilly and Company's patent on antidepressant Prozac was about to expire, the pharmaceutical giant successfully asked the Food and Drug Administration to approve it to treat PMDD, providing a patent extension worth millions. Eli Lilly repackaged Prozac in pink and purple and rechristened it the feminine-sounding "Sarafem." Other drug companies rushed to market similar products. They deliberately listed physical problems associated with menstruation for some women, such as breast tenderness or bloating, and added a list of mood problems from the PMDD list that virtually every human being experiences.

The PMDD mood symptoms are also listed for menopause, although they are supposedly caused at menopause by deficiency in the hormones whose increase supposedly causes PMDD. I half-jokingly predicted that we would soon hear about premenarcheal dysphoric disorder between a baby girl's birth and her first period, thus pathologizing women's moods from birth to death.

Women should be wary of believing claims that high-tech research has now proven that PMDD is real. We should also advocate a national conversation -- even congressional hearings -- about the often hidden, devastating consequences of simply being given diagnostic labels such as PMDD. Finally, we should stop pathologizing ourselves and other women and help each other look at what's really behind our feelings.

The full text of this article appears in the Summer issue of Ms. magazine, available on newsstands or by joining the Ms. community at www.msmagazine.com.


PAULA J. CAPLAN, Ph.D., is a clinical and research psychologist, currently a nonresident fellow at the DuBois Institute, Harvard University. She is author of They Say You're Crazy: How the World's Most Powerful Psychiatrists Decide Who's Normal (Da Capo Press, 1996).
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Reproductive Justice headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: big pharma, premenstrual dysphoric di, menstruation, pms, pmdd


Comments are closed-

An Important Point
Posted by: annavan1 on Sep 8, 2008 7:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a useful perspective, and I was a little startled to realize that PMS is being defined as a mental illness - with all the stigma that could potentially entail.
Although I have fairly significant PMS issues and am on Zoloft because of that, I never viewed myself as having a mental illness! Like the hereditary tendency to depression, I see it as a physiological issue, and predominantly a biochemical issue at that.
I do find the anti-depressant very helpful, but am concerned that I am, or may be labeled "mentally ill". Particularly these days, since a whole lotta people can access your private medical data.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: An Important Point Posted by: clvngodess
» RE: An Important Point Posted by: sallyride
» It's not "mental illness" ! Posted by: fanny666

Comments are closed-

The Missing Element
Posted by: stellabloo on Sep 8, 2008 7:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course the next step is medication. Of course, only doctors can prescribe the proper meds and if you experience adverse side effects, well, that just makes you an unfortunate statistic.

The sad truth is that there are very simple solutions to many medical 'problems' (e.g. eat healthy, get enough sleep, avoid alcohol and tobacco etc) and none of these are as glamorous or profitable as a new disorder that requires special medication. The #1 supplement that women should take for PMS is magnesium and bet ya dollars to donuts, you are hearing this the very first time from me :.(

Just as potassium works in conjunction with sodium to move material across the cell membrane, so do magnesium and calcium function as electrolytes to regulate nerve and muscle impulses in your body. That's right, calcium has very little to do with your bones and everything to do with everything else: your mental abilities, your reaction time, your ability to relax, your heart muscles, the smooth muscles of your digestive tract - and uterus.

You should look for a high absorption supplement containing both calcium AND magnesium. You want to see magnesium/calcium in the citrate/fumerate/glutamate forms for maximum effectiveness. One or two tablets daily. Then you'll know why the euros like their bottled mineral water so much.

However, the medical establishment persists in shovelling calcium carbonate - CHALK - not to mention BRAN - into us by the truckload. And yet we are still beset by osteoporosis, heart disease, fatigue, obesity and yes, PMS.
Wait, isn't there a pill for that? :.(

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Missing Element Posted by: RachelAB
» RE: The Missing Element Posted by: countingdaisies

Comments are closed-

Reprise of old attack on women
Posted by: shoosta on Sep 8, 2008 9:40 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for the article. The diagnosis as a disorder or a syndrome of a wholly natural occurance is preposterous on its face and purposely discriminatory against all women. This tactic of labeling menstrating women as somehow being "disordered" harkens back to prior centuries when women were considered too "delicate" or too "emotional" or too "undisciplined" or too "unintelligent" to engage in any interaction with real world events. Women were kept virtual prisoners, oblivious to local or global events, whose only roles were childbirth and subservience to a male dominated society. That may be ok for Sarah Palin, but is that really ok for the rest of us? Do men really want a drugged and incoherent wife or girlfriend, or do they prefere another human being that can share and partner with them in facing the world?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Makes Sense In A Male Dominated World
Posted by: jooljetkmae on Sep 8, 2008 1:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The official rationale for diagnosing and treating people mental health professionals say are mentally ill is that they are a "danger to themselves or others." But who are the majority of these people who get psychiatric diagnoses? It's mostly women and children. Yet, as far as dangerousness goes, the overwhelming majority of violent crime offenders are adult males. The reality is that a person's helplessness and powerlessness is better indicator of the likelihood that she/he will be dx'd with a mental disorder.

So it makes perfect sense in a male dominated world, with a male dominated psychiatry, that the movements of a woman's reproductive hormones are pathologized and seen as "dangerous". I have yet to see a man getting beaten up by a woman's estrogen, but I've seen more than one example of a man being violent towards a woman. As far as hormonal differences between the sexes goes, a man's testosterone is what is actually potentially dangerous, not a woman's reproductive cycle. More than anything else, it's the physical size and strength of the man of a household that is potentially dangerous to the women and children of a household.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Women use PMS and emotional distress to beat murder raps
Posted by: lindat on Sep 8, 2008 1:19 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
all the time, so there's a silver lining in all of this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» And it works! Posted by: countingdaisies

Comments are closed-

"Devastating consequences"?
Posted by: fanny666 on Sep 8, 2008 3:11 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What exactly are those devastating consequences?

There's a whole lot of weird Scientology-like anti-psychology rhetoric on this website. Nicotine addiction is listed in the DSM. Does that make it a "mental illness"? Not really. Some women have really, really bad PMS. There are a TON of endocrine disruptions that can happen, some women might be really suffering. Giving a name to that suffering now has devastating, sexist consequences? What hype.

If anything, this type of article stigmatizes mental illness- like women who become suicidal every 28 days should suck it up and realize that it's a natural thing. Well, sometimes, it's not. Giving their experience a label is not a bad thing in and of itself. The attacks on the DSM show a lot of ignorance about what purpose the DSM serves.

For example, some women with depression get worse at certain times of the month (link) . Some schizophrenic or psychotic women have much worse symptom expression at certain times of the month (link), same with bipolar disorder (link). Hormones are very powerful things, there are ALL KINDS of things that can get disregulated (link).

The danger is not in the creation of a diagnosis for people who have a problem, the danger comes in either unnecessarily medicating people who don't really have a problem, or in telling people who really DO have a problem that they should suck it up. Any doctor or specialist should know the actual purpose of the DSM.

The weird thing is that if there was some article saying "some women have really horrible PMS, and they should just smoke pot" everybody would love it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

A Great Idea
Posted by: on Sep 8, 2008 4:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If women [hello dear wife, are you reading?] are going to use PMS as an excuse to verbally and emotionally abuse others, well then I say "Hell, yes!" officially pathologize it. At least then maybe there will be some treatment options.

Actually, hasn't it already been pathologized? It's called bipolarism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Research??
Posted by: gellero1 on Sep 8, 2008 7:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
" researchers have tried unsuccessfully to prove that women are more likely to have mood problems premenstrually than at other times. "

It's pretty obvious to most humans. 'Research' is hardly needed.

Sorry, girls.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Another alphabet illness from Big Pharma
Posted by: countingdaisies on Sep 8, 2008 7:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Big Pharma is responsible for creating the alphabet non-illness since they just happen to have the magic pill and would like to sell more of them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

I dont know if its real or not
Posted by: lil ole me on Sep 8, 2008 8:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but whenever my ex girlfriend said she had it(i want to emphasis ex), I knew it was time to run for the hills.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

An Important Point
Posted by: annavan1 on Sep 8, 2008 7:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a useful perspective, and I was a little startled to realize that PMS is being defined as a mental illness - with all the stigma that could potentially entail.
Although I have fairly significant PMS issues and am on Zoloft because of that, I never viewed myself as having a mental illness! Like the hereditary tendency to depression, I see it as a physiological issue, and predominantly a biochemical issue at that.
I do find the anti-depressant very helpful, but am concerned that I am, or may be labeled "mentally ill". Particularly these days, since a whole lotta people can access your private medical data.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: An Important Point Posted by: clvngodess
» RE: An Important Point Posted by: sallyride
» It's not "mental illness" ! Posted by: fanny666

Comments are closed-

The Missing Element
Posted by: stellabloo on Sep 8, 2008 7:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course the next step is medication. Of course, only doctors can prescribe the proper meds and if you experience adverse side effects, well, that just makes you an unfortunate statistic.

The sad truth is that there are very simple solutions to many medical 'problems' (e.g. eat healthy, get enough sleep, avoid alcohol and tobacco etc) and none of these are as glamorous or profitable as a new disorder that requires special medication. The #1 supplement that women should take for PMS is magnesium and bet ya dollars to donuts, you are hearing this the very first time from me :.(

Just as potassium works in conjunction with sodium to move material across the cell membrane, so do magnesium and calcium function as electrolytes to regulate nerve and muscle impulses in your body. That's right, calcium has very little to do with your bones and everything to do with everything else: your mental abilities, your reaction time, your ability to relax, your heart muscles, the smooth muscles of your digestive tract - and uterus.

You should look for a high absorption supplement containing both calcium AND magnesium. You want to see magnesium/calcium in the citrate/fumerate/glutamate forms for maximum effectiveness. One or two tablets daily. Then you'll know why the euros like their bottled mineral water so much.

However, the medical establishment persists in shovelling calcium carbonate - CHALK - not to mention BRAN - into us by the truckload. And yet we are still beset by osteoporosis, heart disease, fatigue, obesity and yes, PMS.
Wait, isn't there a pill for that? :.(

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Missing Element Posted by: RachelAB
» RE: The Missing Element Posted by: countingdaisies

Comments are closed-

Reprise of old attack on women
Posted by: shoosta on Sep 8, 2008 9:40 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for the article. The diagnosis as a disorder or a syndrome of a wholly natural occurance is preposterous on its face and purposely discriminatory against all women. This tactic of labeling menstrating women as somehow being "disordered" harkens back to prior centuries when women were considered too "delicate" or too "emotional" or too "undisciplined" or too "unintelligent" to engage in any interaction with real world events. Women were kept virtual prisoners, oblivious to local or global events, whose only roles were childbirth and subservience to a male dominated society. That may be ok for Sarah Palin, but is that really ok for the rest of us? Do men really want a drugged and incoherent wife or girlfriend, or do they prefere another human being that can share and partner with them in facing the world?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Makes Sense In A Male Dominated World
Posted by: jooljetkmae on Sep 8, 2008 1:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The official rationale for diagnosing and treating people mental health professionals say are mentally ill is that they are a "danger to themselves or others." But who are the majority of these people who get psychiatric diagnoses? It's mostly women and children. Yet, as far as dangerousness goes, the overwhelming majority of violent crime offenders are adult males. The reality is that a person's helplessness and powerlessness is better indicator of the likelihood that she/he will be dx'd with a mental disorder.

So it makes perfect sense in a male dominated world, with a male dominated psychiatry, that the movements of a woman's reproductive hormones are pathologized and seen as "dangerous". I have yet to see a man getting beaten up by a woman's estrogen, but I've seen more than one example of a man being violent towards a woman. As far as hormonal differences between the sexes goes, a man's testosterone is what is actually potentially dangerous, not a woman's reproductive cycle. More than anything else, it's the physical size and strength of the man of a household that is potentially dangerous to the women and children of a household.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Women use PMS and emotional distress to beat murder raps
Posted by: lindat on Sep 8, 2008 1:19 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
all the time, so there's a silver lining in all of this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» And it works! Posted by: countingdaisies

Comments are closed-

"Devastating consequences"?
Posted by: fanny666 on Sep 8, 2008 3:11 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What exactly are those devastating consequences?

There's a whole lot of weird Scientology-like anti-psychology rhetoric on this website. Nicotine addiction is listed in the DSM. Does that make it a "mental illness"? Not really. Some women have really, really bad PMS. There are a TON of endocrine disruptions that can happen, some women might be really suffering. Giving a name to that suffering now has devastating, sexist consequences? What hype.

If anything, this type of article stigmatizes mental illness- like women who become suicidal every 28 days should suck it up and realize that it's a natural thing. Well, sometimes, it's not. Giving their experience a label is not a bad thing in and of itself. The attacks on the DSM show a lot of ignorance about what purpose the DSM serves.

For example, some women with depression get worse at certain times of the month (link) . Some schizophrenic or psychotic women have much worse symptom expression at certain times of the month (link), same with bipolar disorder (link). Hormones are very powerful things, there are ALL KINDS of things that can get disregulated (link).

The danger is not in the creation of a diagnosis for people who have a problem, the danger comes in either unnecessarily medicating people who don't really have a problem, or in telling people who really DO have a problem that they should suck it up. Any doctor or specialist should know the actual purpose of the DSM.

The weird thing is that if there was some article saying "some women have really horrible PMS, and they should just smoke pot" everybody would love it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

A Great Idea
Posted by: on Sep 8, 2008 4:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If women [hello dear wife, are you reading?] are going to use PMS as an excuse to verbally and emotionally abuse others, well then I say "Hell, yes!" officially pathologize it. At least then maybe there will be some treatment options.

Actually, hasn't it already been pathologized? It's called bipolarism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Research??
Posted by: gellero1 on Sep 8, 2008 7:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
" researchers have tried unsuccessfully to prove that women are more likely to have mood problems premenstrually than at other times. "

It's pretty obvious to most humans. 'Research' is hardly needed.

Sorry, girls.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Another alphabet illness from Big Pharma
Posted by: countingdaisies on Sep 8, 2008 7:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Big Pharma is responsible for creating the alphabet non-illness since they just happen to have the magic pill and would like to sell more of them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

I dont know if its real or not
Posted by: lil ole me on Sep 8, 2008 8:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but whenever my ex girlfriend said she had it(i want to emphasis ex), I knew it was time to run for the hills.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS