COMMENTS: 73
Palin Pick Is GOP Hypocrisy at its Best
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Reproductive Justice headlines via email.
Watching Palin address the RNC from here in St. Paul, Wednesday, I could have sworn I heard Katherine Harris cheer. Remember Harris, Florida's Secretary of State in 2001, and co-chair of her state's Bush/Cheney Committee? No one did more to snag the White House for her man -- and no one was laughed and scoffed at more heartily by the media. While the press poo-poo'ed her make-up ("she seems to have applied her makeup with a trowel" wrote the Washington Post) and introduced her to the public as caricature ("Cruella de Ville"), as Florida's top election-cop, Harris purged enough voter rolls, understaffed enough voting places and ill-equipped the voting system sufficiently to guarantee election day chaos. Parodied in the press, she rose to stardom in the GOP. Come Inauguration Day 2001, Florida Republicans threw an enormous bash for the woman they dubbed "our Joan of Arc." Soon after she was elected to Congress.Â
So it is with Palin. While her record stinks, so does the media coverage. In place of serious discussion of her policies on the environment, on human rights, on taxes, free speech and governance, we've had five days of "Veep Pregnant Teen Shock" and there's more than enough misogyny in the mix to give the McCain camp a stick to beat any truly investigative members of press-corps with.Â
Desperate for female votes (a group the Democrats have taken for granted for years,) John McCain clearly hopes his Palin pick will burnish his appeal among middle-of-the-road women. It's a long-shot. Palin believes abortion is a crime even in the case of rape and incest (that was even too draconian for the voters of South Dakota). She supports teaching creationism in schools as strongly as, as Governor, she opposed environmental protections for the Holy planet.Â
The hypocrisy is rank. Bristol, Palin's daughter "made the decision on her own to keep the baby," McCain's aides told the press. That's not a choice pregnant teens would have under the proposed administration of her mother and McCain. As for her claims to oppose corruption and pork - according to the Alaska press, she supported that costly bridge to "nowhere" for years, before finally canceling it as Governor. And experience? Again, according to Alaskan papers, during Palin's tenure as Mayor, most of the actual work of running small Wasilla was turned over to an administrator after Palin's precipitous firings gave rise to a recall campaign. Mayor Palin even tried to fire City
Librarian after she demurred at a proposal to censor the library's collection.Â
Will the media see the substance or only the "Ms. Congeniality." We'll find out soon enough. But it's likely she'll get plenty of jabs in before then if her first performance on the national stage is anything to go by. Palin can dig at Obama more effectively than her running mate. (Does anyone not hear the racism in her allusion to John McCain's as the "sort of name you find on small town war memorials.") And if you're counting on her getting a grilling on the campaign trail, don't hold your breath. Reading from the Karen Hughes/Karl Rove campaign playbook, they McCain team will keep Palin from answering questions (as they did a young Texas Governor called Bush.)
They're already de-legitimating the questioners, and there will simply be no access for anyone but "Fox News" pals and those who act like them.
 So will the public that's been fed a fact-free diet of John McCain the "maverick," see through Palin, the fresh-faced feminist? Don't bet on it.
 Laura Flanders is host of GRITtv.org and author of BushWomen: Tales of a Cynical Species, (2004, Verso.)
Stay up to date with the latest Reproductive Justice headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jmari on Sep 5, 2008 2:41 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh by the way now that Sarah gave birth to a disabled child you have a friend in the White House....because before that Sarah could have cared less having previously voted down funding.
Sarah Palin doesn't give to us- SHE TAKES takes AWAY from us -our rights- our freedom and all with a painted "LIPSTICK" smile on her face.
"Actions speak louder than words"
- Pay Attention Voters
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: "Do what I say Not what I do "...I am Sarah Palin and I approved this message!
Posted by: stev90
Comments are closed-
Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals on Sep 5, 2008 3:35 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Feminism is openly embraced now by REPUBLICANS...
Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals
» Family values being discussed by Dems, feminism being preached by Repubs; who'da thought it?
Posted by: Beck
» RE: So Much For Feminism? Feminism is openly embraced now by REPUBLICANS
Posted by: luzmejor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kiel on Sep 5, 2008 5:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ashbaines on Sep 5, 2008 5:33 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Expect her to be dispatched to an NRA rally to boost military enlistments of goy boys for the expansion of Israel.
I can see Perle, Ledeen, Abrams, Bolton, Wolfie and the others smoking cigars and high fiving each other on how they put the "knuckle dragging contingent" to good use this time around....
same ole same ole...
Where are the Jacobins when we need to storm the Heritage Foundation and hang it's membership?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Wagenvoord on Sep 5, 2008 6:07 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Palin is a Teflon Magnolia, so we are wasting our time criticizing her. Instead,we should point out that McCain's first presidential decision was picking a running mate, and that he wasted it on what was little more than a cheap publicity stunt.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Sep 5, 2008 6:06 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dockboy on Sep 5, 2008 6:13 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» And what about men? They are SOL if they're not "conservative".
Posted by: maxpayne
» Isn't it funny the huge flip-flop Republicans just made?
Posted by: Beck
» Quiz
Posted by: PaulD
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 5, 2008 6:18 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And by the way, why are the pollsters even bothering to give either party false elevation in the polls to Mccain or even Obama despite their voting records in the Senate? If the average Joe or Jane looking for a job in almost any profession were to give such shitty speeches like those at the political conventions, they would stand no chance of being given even a second interview let alone the job. Why do we the sheeple allow the two-party duopoly to FUCK America to DEATH ?
VOTENADER.ORG !!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Because Paling is a Republican, she's a "hottie". If she were a Democrat, she'd be called a slut.
Posted by: katee
Comments are closed-
Posted by: donnal on Sep 5, 2008 6:44 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where is the concern for this country when we hear nothing about Barry/Barack being served yesterday, on a suit that is in the Philly courts? This suit is asking for his real COLB, the proof of citizenship, questions on his dual passports,along with is he qualified to run as a native born? You give us information on the dangers of Gov. Palin becoming VP, but do not think that this suit is information that perhaps we may and would need to know to make a choice for this man who wants to be President?
Looking into her background is fair, and it seems to be providing cover for him...but as you outed her on her family values on the net...fair play would be to out him... and I am not talking about policy when I say outing.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yes, looking into background is fair. How, then, can you claim anyone was "outed"?
Posted by: Beck
» RE: Larrygate is more important than Troopergate? Spoken like a true wingnut
Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
» RE: AngryWhiteFemale...your name, speaks volumes.
Posted by: donnal
» RE: AngryWhiteFemale...your name, speaks volumes.
Posted by: cdub
» RE: He did not "serve at her pleasure". He was not in a union.
Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
» RE: You haven't heard of Larrygate, and that his associates are bisexual.
Posted by: maestra
» RE: You haven't heard of Larrygate...Wingnuts can't talk about ideas
Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
» RE: Larrygate is only the start of his lies
Posted by: donnal
» RE: You haven't heard of Larrygate, and that his associates are bisexual.
Posted by: john mont
» Donnal if a typical Low information wingnut
Posted by: TruthBeTold
» RE: sticks and stones
Posted by: donnal
» RE: sticks and stones
Posted by: rotorooter
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal on Sep 5, 2008 7:11 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It firms up McInsane's base while Obama abandoned his.
The Democraps have NO answer again and continue to "play nice" while their campaign burns.
Biden brought NOTHING to the table for a win in Nov. If anything his selection SHOUTS "more of the same..." weakness, ineptitude in framing arguments, always on the defensive, caving in to the FORMER core values of the Democrapic party.
The Democraps come across as phonies trying to be Repukes, and people can smell this a mile away. Why vote for a Repuke-like when you can have the real thing?
If anyone though this election was going to be about REAL issues instead of the same old, same old, wedge issues, then you have been snorting the Obama platitudes to the point you better check in at Betty Ford.
The Democraps are either willing enablers of the Shrub administration or the dumbest people on the planet. They have done NOTHING to hold them accountable, so many people are starting to believe, heck, they probably did nothing wrong.
I'm voting third party this year for the first time in my life. I will not be a part of a charade...again.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: But it was the cement...The right is fleeing to Bob Barr...
Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
» RE: Your senerio is as good as any...
Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal
» RE: But it was the cement...The right is fleeing to Bob Barr...
Posted by: john mont
Comments are closed-
Posted by: using on Sep 5, 2008 7:28 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And since most of the newspapers and tv channels are owned by the corps I say we should complain loudly, boycott those journalists and if need be their newspapers...and support only those journalist and newspapers that stand in our corner. Money may talk to them, but only because it is beleived that they have the power to influence us. If it were beleived that they do not influence us, then their value would be lost, would it not?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The media has abandoned its role as the Fourth Estate which is why I cancelled my TV service
Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
» Who want to take bets on how fast
Posted by: TruthBeTold
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Sep 5, 2008 7:41 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She doesn't believe in climate change, even though her state is loosing it's permafrost! In the remote Inupiat island community of Shishmaref in the far west of Alaska, the erosion has already ended a way of life that had lasted for centuries. At its highest point the island stands at just 22ft, and confronted by thinner protective sea ice and storms that have eroded large chunks of the island, villagers voted to move their community to the mainland in 2002." That is from an Alaska Community newspaper.
So basically this woman (a)doesn't want to acknowlegde anything except guns, war, and illiteracy. This is the woman that would be a heartbeat away from being the next President of the USA! Haven't we had enough of that these last 8 years with the current Mis-Administration, please! Are we just supposed to overlook the avarice, corruption, ineptitude of "leadership" of the past and put this new group without clue into office, please! How many millions were spent to derail Bill Clinton for a dress stain, yet these criminals that should be put down for Treason, High Crimes & Misdemeanors are still in office? And John McCain that helped to enable them is being touted as some kind of hero! Double Standard!
McShame doesn't have the judgment, temperament, or vision to led this country out of the mess he and his Repugnikan compatriots have de-regulated and warred us into, ENOUGH!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PaulK on Sep 5, 2008 7:43 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My boyfriend got me pregnant. Mom says that now everyone, both in church and in town, will hate me, and her too. She kept me home from school for seven months and then I had the baby. I still have a lot of the baby fat. Why does everyone hate me?
--Bristol
Dear Bristol,
I’m liberal. A friend’s daughter got pregnant twice and I don’t hate my friends or their daughter either. These things just happen, although the new grandparents really don’t like taking the economic hit. Most liberals are like this.
Dear Paul,
A teen in our church got pregnant. If we don’t castigate her, and castigate her family for allowing this to happen, pretty soon all the teens will be doing it.
--The Parisioners
Dear Parishioners,
You have no heart. I don’t like your particular church.
Dear Paul,
I’m a compassionate mom. Also I can get away with anything. In order to lift the odor of permanent castigation and of shame from my pregnant daughter, and from myself, I put on an elaborate deception. In the end I technically “stole” my daughter’s baby, but we have an in-house agreement that it’s her baby. I only lied a little, and I’m sure I got away with it. You’re a liberal, so you can forgive anything, right? Let it slide?
--Governor Sarah
Dear Governor Sarah,
I understand the compassion angle. However, if Trig is actually Bristol’s baby, then I think you may have broken a number of laws. How did you sign the birth certificate? At the times when you medically misrepresented yourself to the public, did you endanger the public welfare? Establishing a public claim to a baby that isn’t yours, even if you have a private agreement that you’ll release this claim later, may be seen by a judge as an attempt to expropriate the baby.
Breaking laws has consequences, governor. I can’t be complicit in a deception that breaks laws.
At this point the “castigation and shame” argument is null and void, because your daughter’s pregnancy is established. That leaves the castigation and shame of breaking laws. Breaking laws is between you, governor, and a judge. However, as a citizen, I report lawbreaking. Lawbreaking also reflects on your ability to be a public official.
I see a rail-thin grandma who stayed rail-thin 7 months into the claimed pregnancy, a governor who didn’t tell even her closest staff for 7 months about her pregnancy, who boasted of her gut-wrenching wind sprints, who flew 8 hours when she supposedly was leaking amniotic fluid and about to drop. This is the same grandma who claims that her daughter is 5 months pregnant so that she couldn’t have given birth 4 months ago, but that’s another one of grandma’s claims. I see Bristol disappearing from high school for the right amount of time during pregnancy and after birth.
I call them as I see them. Under a veil of “Don’t hurt Bristol” you are hurting Bristol. Maintaining a deception in the middle of great public scrutiny is placing great pressure on Bristol and the other family members, not to get caught in a huge deception. For Bristol’s health, you need to drop the deception.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE:Stupid little mind...the daughter is 5 months
Posted by: donnal
» I call em as I see em.
Posted by: PaulK
» RE: Stupid little mind...The liars on the right SAY Bristol is 5 months
Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
Comments are closed-
Posted by: godsbreath64 on Sep 5, 2008 7:44 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BBaumer on Sep 5, 2008 8:13 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The 2008 Election: What's Really At Stake?"
Featuring Naomi Klein, Jeremy Scahill, Roberto Lovato, Laura Flanders and Malia Lazu.
Saturday, September 13 - 8pm
The Great Hall of The Cooper Union.
7 East 7th Street (at Third Avenue), Manhattan
Tickets Sliding Scale $6 to $15
Special Advance Reception 6:30pm:
A cozy reception where you can meet the panelists and Indypendent contributors, hors d'oeuvres and open bar — tickets start at $35.
RESERVE TICKETS NOW!
ONLINE at Brown Paper Tickets or call the TICKET HOTLINE: 1-800-838-3006
MORE INFO: www.indypendent.org, 212-221-0521 or email indybenefit@gmail.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LiveFree on Sep 5, 2008 8:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Faith in the American People. But we must never have faith in the elites
Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
Comments are closed-
Posted by: counterpoint on Sep 5, 2008 10:36 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Palin's "family affairs" showcase scandalously counterproductive Republican and Evangelical policies
Posted by: dangerouslysane
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ohb0b on Sep 5, 2008 12:26 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ever since Goldwater's landslide 1964 defeat (in your guts, you know he's nuts), they have striven to keep the rad-con base under wraps during conventions, and appeal to rational people by putting on a moderate face.
But they are desperate this year. After eight years of being in charge, they can't run on the issues, so they have resorted to the tried and true Republican method of winning elections.
I'll admit, after Palin's speech the other day, for the first time I was worried. Here was a snarky, Coulteresque persona, feeding red meat to the wing-nut base. With the polls so tight, and the usual Republican voter suppression shenanigans, bringing out the nut-jobs may just push them over the top and we suffer four more years of failed Republican policies.
Then I had my faith restored by John McCain's bland, "we're Americans first, we'll reach out across party lines" centrist acceptance speech. Ah, the sweet reminisces of another candidate (whose positions McCain agrees with 90% of the time)who long ago ran as a moderate "compassionate conservative." How will they reconcile the two parties? Which Republican party will you vote for?
It is my day off, and I was listening to the car radio while running some errands. It was hilarious listening to a leader of the pro-choice Republicans trying to defend the ticket. Her logic: She expects the Democrats to retain control of Congress, and they "better damn well do their job" and block any radical Supreme Court nominations.Such a contortionist act will be hard to follow, but I'm looking forward to a lot more of them before the election.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Which Republican Party will you vote for?
Posted by: dangerouslysane
Comments are closed-
Posted by: p.ray on Sep 5, 2008 12:50 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rescue from bad owners is a positive step in the right direction. However, in shelters across the United States, Pit Bulls (or dogs that appear to be Pit Bulls) comprise a large portion of the shelter's population. Due to the stigma associated with the breed (and, often, because of overcrowding) many are destroyed.
However, as a self-described "Pit Bull with lipstick," (and in stark contrast to her espoused religious fundamentalism) Sarah Palin doesn't want to be saved!
Because she lacks both proper socialization and strong training, the only solutions possible are to: neuter, contain behind stong walls, muzzle in public and keep on a short strong leash, or euthanize.
Communities within the following US states have already or propose to ban Pit Bulls and other "Bully Breeds": Michigan, Utah, Missouri, Florida, Iowa, Washington, Colorado, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Ohio, Mississippi, Illinois, and Kentucky have already banned.
I suggest we follow their lead and --
BAN SARAH PALIN
Phala
BTW: This alleged pro-lifer conservationist continues to promte the illegal aerial killing of the truly endangered "lone wolves" of her own 'heartless' land. Joe Biden needs to take a page out of her poorly written playbook and eschew "fair-chase" morality, hunt from aloft, and tear her up!
I, for one, will gladly pay a $150 bounty for her "RIGHT front leg"!
Phala
Wake UP - Be NOT Afraid - This Eight Year-long Nightmare Will Soon Be Over!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Pit Bulls Banned Nationwide and Slated for Worldwide Eradication
Posted by: Pebbles
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Pebbles on Sep 5, 2008 2:05 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The McC-P gang has no right to protest. If they didn't want it to be an issue, Someone might have politely declined a spot on the ticket. You don't have to be a PR genius to see that this story is red meat for a broad range of interest groups. It would never have been an issue beyond (or possibly even within) the 49th state if the campaign hadn't made it news.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Gimme a break!
Posted by: dangerouslysane
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Sep 5, 2008 2:06 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Plan B
Posted by: edgar1
» RE: Plan B
Posted by: cdub
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Drclaw on Sep 5, 2008 3:27 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sabrina on Sep 5, 2008 7:39 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Richard
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Palin's Judgement in Question
Posted by: cdub
» RE: Palin's Judgement in Question
Posted by: katee
» Alaskan/U.S. cultural divide
Posted by: sheena2u
Comments are closed-
Posted by: onevoter on Sep 5, 2008 7:55 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cowardly, hypocritical bitch!
Which animal would Jesus shoot from a plane?
Have you ever heard of aerial hunting? It's a brutal practice. Wolves are shot from low-flying aircraft or chased to exhaustion, then killed at point-blank range.
Governor Sarah Palin, the Republican nominee for Vice President, promotes this barbaric practice, exploiting a loophole in the Federal Airborne Hunting Act to allow private wolf killers to shoot down wolves using aircraft. We have to get the word out about this!
Please watch this powerful video by Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund, and then share it with every wildlife lover you know:
http://actionfund.defenders.org/palinvideo
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Cannoliamo on Sep 6, 2008 6:00 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are the GOPers who are protecting Palin from the press the same right-wing conservatives who demanded press coverage of Whitewatergate and Paula Jones? Isn't this more a case of "use the press against your foes and protect your allies from negative press." Isn't this the same basis for the government propaganda campaigns that are rampant in so many illegitimate governments?
... just wondering.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Red Green on Sep 6, 2008 11:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wagnerrocks@gmail.com on Sep 6, 2008 3:23 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: stev90 on Sep 7, 2008 10:30 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sheena2u on Sep 8, 2008 12:42 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The treatment of Hillary Clinton by the Repubican extremists was base and sexist. Sarah Palin, herself, had the unmitigated gall to say Hillary was whining and basically needed to man up and "prove herself." These are not the words of a woman who deserves to be treated with kid gloves, or with deference.
The Republicans want it both ways. They want to persecute Hillary freely, and then they expect to bring forth an insultingly unqualified female candidate and say "Back off folks, be nice, play soft ball, don't even think of being mean to our little flower or we will screech 'sexism!'." Meanwhile they keep her sequestered away where they can cram her brain with as many short statements as possible so that she can parrot whatever they want her to say or do.
Less than two years ago she was not yet Governor of Alaska, and this is her primary claim to fame until now. Alaska is very much unlike the rest of the country, or America at large, and her experience as governor qualifies her in no way to the White House except in the ficticious imaginations of Republican spin doctors and zealots. Alaska is the largest state, and the second smallest in population. The problems of Alaska are entirely unlike those of the rest of the country. To say that she has international experience because Alaska borders Russia and Canada is a desperate stretch and an insult to everyone's intelligence.
Nor do her years as Mayor of Wasilla, then a town of less than 6,000 people qualify her to be Vice President. As Mayor she took a tiny town with no debt and saddled it with a debt of over two million, and she promoted unbridled development that was entirely out of character with the prior friendly charm and historic uniqueness of the area. It is now a charmless, polluted, and unattractive hodgepodge of box stores and gravel pits.
The choice of an unqualified woman who will be a parrot and a puppet to Karl Rove, Dick Cheney, and the Republican smear machine is an insult to the office of Vice President, and to intelligent women and men. Her selection was cynical, and an example of the very worst corruption and dishonesty in politics.
If this is an example of "change," then we must redefine the word to mean "the same old cynical machinations that represent the worst possible side of politics."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Double standard/hypocrisy
Posted by: mnstra
Comments are closed-
Posted by: stev90 on Sep 9, 2008 6:35 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just like 8 years of the failed policies of Bush/Cheney/Rove administration.
Same old, same old.
Guaranteeing the continued de-leveraging and financial meltdown of America.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: GOP McCain/Palin running on a flatform of hypocrisy, double standard and blatant lies.
Posted by: katee
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jmari on Sep 5, 2008 2:41 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh by the way now that Sarah gave birth to a disabled child you have a friend in the White House....because before that Sarah could have cared less having previously voted down funding.
Sarah Palin doesn't give to us- SHE TAKES takes AWAY from us -our rights- our freedom and all with a painted "LIPSTICK" smile on her face.
"Actions speak louder than words"
- Pay Attention Voters
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: "Do what I say Not what I do "...I am Sarah Palin and I approved this message!
Posted by: stev90
Comments are closed-
Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals on Sep 5, 2008 3:35 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Feminism is openly embraced now by REPUBLICANS...
Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals
» Family values being discussed by Dems, feminism being preached by Repubs; who'da thought it?
Posted by: Beck
» RE: So Much For Feminism? Feminism is openly embraced now by REPUBLICANS
Posted by: luzmejor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kiel on Sep 5, 2008 5:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ashbaines on Sep 5, 2008 5:33 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Expect her to be dispatched to an NRA rally to boost military enlistments of goy boys for the expansion of Israel.
I can see Perle, Ledeen, Abrams, Bolton, Wolfie and the others smoking cigars and high fiving each other on how they put the "knuckle dragging contingent" to good use this time around....
same ole same ole...
Where are the Jacobins when we need to storm the Heritage Foundation and hang it's membership?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Wagenvoord on Sep 5, 2008 6:07 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Palin is a Teflon Magnolia, so we are wasting our time criticizing her. Instead,we should point out that McCain's first presidential decision was picking a running mate, and that he wasted it on what was little more than a cheap publicity stunt.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Sep 5, 2008 6:06 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dockboy on Sep 5, 2008 6:13 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» And what about men? They are SOL if they're not "conservative".
Posted by: maxpayne
» Isn't it funny the huge flip-flop Republicans just made?
Posted by: Beck
» Quiz
Posted by: PaulD
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 5, 2008 6:18 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And by the way, why are the pollsters even bothering to give either party false elevation in the polls to Mccain or even Obama despite their voting records in the Senate? If the average Joe or Jane looking for a job in almost any profession were to give such shitty speeches like those at the political conventions, they would stand no chance of being given even a second interview let alone the job. Why do we the sheeple allow the two-party duopoly to FUCK America to DEATH ?
VOTENADER.ORG !!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Because Paling is a Republican, she's a "hottie". If she were a Democrat, she'd be called a slut.
Posted by: katee
Comments are closed-
Posted by: donnal on Sep 5, 2008 6:44 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where is the concern for this country when we hear nothing about Barry/Barack being served yesterday, on a suit that is in the Philly courts? This suit is asking for his real COLB, the proof of citizenship, questions on his dual passports,along with is he qualified to run as a native born? You give us information on the dangers of Gov. Palin becoming VP, but do not think that this suit is information that perhaps we may and would need to know to make a choice for this man who wants to be President?
Looking into her background is fair, and it seems to be providing cover for him...but as you outed her on her family values on the net...fair play would be to out him... and I am not talking about policy when I say outing.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yes, looking into background is fair. How, then, can you claim anyone was "outed"?
Posted by: Beck
» RE: Larrygate is more important than Troopergate? Spoken like a true wingnut
Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
» RE: AngryWhiteFemale...your name, speaks volumes.
Posted by: donnal
» RE: AngryWhiteFemale...your name, speaks volumes.
Posted by: cdub
» RE: He did not "serve at her pleasure". He was not in a union.
Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
» RE: You haven't heard of Larrygate, and that his associates are bisexual.
Posted by: maestra
» RE: You haven't heard of Larrygate...Wingnuts can't talk about ideas
Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
» RE: Larrygate is only the start of his lies
Posted by: donnal
» RE: You haven't heard of Larrygate, and that his associates are bisexual.
Posted by: john mont
» Donnal if a typical Low information wingnut
Posted by: TruthBeTold
» RE: sticks and stones
Posted by: donnal
» RE: sticks and stones
Posted by: rotorooter
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal on Sep 5, 2008 7:11 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It firms up McInsane's base while Obama abandoned his.
The Democraps have NO answer again and continue to "play nice" while their campaign burns.
Biden brought NOTHING to the table for a win in Nov. If anything his selection SHOUTS "more of the same..." weakness, ineptitude in framing arguments, always on the defensive, caving in to the FORMER core values of the Democrapic party.
The Democraps come across as phonies trying to be Repukes, and people can smell this a mile away. Why vote for a Repuke-like when you can have the real thing?
If anyone though this election was going to be about REAL issues instead of the same old, same old, wedge issues, then you have been snorting the Obama platitudes to the point you better check in at Betty Ford.
The Democraps are either willing enablers of the Shrub administration or the dumbest people on the planet. They have done NOTHING to hold them accountable, so many people are starting to believe, heck, they probably did nothing wrong.
I'm voting third party this year for the first time in my life. I will not be a part of a charade...again.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: But it was the cement...The right is fleeing to Bob Barr...
Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
» RE: Your senerio is as good as any...
Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal
» RE: But it was the cement...The right is fleeing to Bob Barr...
Posted by: john mont
Comments are closed-
Posted by: using on Sep 5, 2008 7:28 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And since most of the newspapers and tv channels are owned by the corps I say we should complain loudly, boycott those journalists and if need be their newspapers...and support only those journalist and newspapers that stand in our corner. Money may talk to them, but only because it is beleived that they have the power to influence us. If it were beleived that they do not influence us, then their value would be lost, would it not?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The media has abandoned its role as the Fourth Estate which is why I cancelled my TV service
Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
» Who want to take bets on how fast
Posted by: TruthBeTold
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Sep 5, 2008 7:41 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She doesn't believe in climate change, even though her state is loosing it's permafrost! In the remote Inupiat island community of Shishmaref in the far west of Alaska, the erosion has already ended a way of life that had lasted for centuries. At its highest point the island stands at just 22ft, and confronted by thinner protective sea ice and storms that have eroded large chunks of the island, villagers voted to move their community to the mainland in 2002." That is from an Alaska Community newspaper.
So basically this woman (a)doesn't want to acknowlegde anything except guns, war, and illiteracy. This is the woman that would be a heartbeat away from being the next President of the USA! Haven't we had enough of that these last 8 years with the current Mis-Administration, please! Are we just supposed to overlook the avarice, corruption, ineptitude of "leadership" of the past and put this new group without clue into office, please! How many millions were spent to derail Bill Clinton for a dress stain, yet these criminals that should be put down for Treason, High Crimes & Misdemeanors are still in office? And John McCain that helped to enable them is being touted as some kind of hero! Double Standard!
McShame doesn't have the judgment, temperament, or vision to led this country out of the mess he and his Repugnikan compatriots have de-regulated and warred us into, ENOUGH!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PaulK on Sep 5, 2008 7:43 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My boyfriend got me pregnant. Mom says that now everyone, both in church and in town, will hate me, and her too. She kept me home from school for seven months and then I had the baby. I still have a lot of the baby fat. Why does everyone hate me?
--Bristol
Dear Bristol,
I’m liberal. A friend’s daughter got pregnant twice and I don’t hate my friends or their daughter either. These things just happen, although the new grandparents really don’t like taking the economic hit. Most liberals are like this.
Dear Paul,
A teen in our church got pregnant. If we don’t castigate her, and castigate her family for allowing this to happen, pretty soon all the teens will be doing it.
--The Parisioners
Dear Parishioners,
You have no heart. I don’t like your particular church.
Dear Paul,
I’m a compassionate mom. Also I can get away with anything. In order to lift the odor of permanent castigation and of shame from my pregnant daughter, and from myself, I put on an elaborate deception. In the end I technically “stole” my daughter’s baby, but we have an in-house agreement that it’s her baby. I only lied a little, and I’m sure I got away with it. You’re a liberal, so you can forgive anything, right? Let it slide?
--Governor Sarah
Dear Governor Sarah,
I understand the compassion angle. However, if Trig is actually Bristol’s baby, then I think you may have broken a number of laws. How did you sign the birth certificate? At the times when you medically misrepresented yourself to the public, did you endanger the public welfare? Establishing a public claim to a baby that isn’t yours, even if you have a private agreement that you’ll release this claim later, may be seen by a judge as an attempt to expropriate the baby.
Breaking laws has consequences, governor. I can’t be complicit in a deception that breaks laws.
At this point the “castigation and shame” argument is null and void, because your daughter’s pregnancy is established. That leaves the castigation and shame of breaking laws. Breaking laws is between you, governor, and a judge. However, as a citizen, I report lawbreaking. Lawbreaking also reflects on your ability to be a public official.
I see a rail-thin grandma who stayed rail-thin 7 months into the claimed pregnancy, a governor who didn’t tell even her closest staff for 7 months about her pregnancy, who boasted of her gut-wrenching wind sprints, who flew 8 hours when she supposedly was leaking amniotic fluid and about to drop. This is the same grandma who claims that her daughter is 5 months pregnant so that she couldn’t have given birth 4 months ago, but that’s another one of grandma’s claims. I see Bristol disappearing from high school for the right amount of time during pregnancy and after birth.
I call them as I see them. Under a veil of “Don’t hurt Bristol” you are hurting Bristol. Maintaining a deception in the middle of great public scrutiny is placing great pressure on Bristol and the other family members, not to get caught in a huge deception. For Bristol’s health, you need to drop the deception.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE:Stupid little mind...the daughter is 5 months
Posted by: donnal
» I call em as I see em.
Posted by: PaulK
» RE: Stupid little mind...The liars on the right SAY Bristol is 5 months
Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
Comments are closed-
Posted by: godsbreath64 on Sep 5, 2008 7:44 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BBaumer on Sep 5, 2008 8:13 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The 2008 Election: What's Really At Stake?"
Featuring Naomi Klein, Jeremy Scahill, Roberto Lovato, Laura Flanders and Malia Lazu.
Saturday, September 13 - 8pm
The Great Hall of The Cooper Union.
7 East 7th Street (at Third Avenue), Manhattan
Tickets Sliding Scale $6 to $15
Special Advance Reception 6:30pm:
A cozy reception where you can meet the panelists and Indypendent contributors, hors d'oeuvres and open bar — tickets start at $35.
RESERVE TICKETS NOW!
ONLINE at Brown Paper Tickets or call the TICKET HOTLINE: 1-800-838-3006
MORE INFO: www.indypendent.org, 212-221-0521 or email indybenefit@gmail.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LiveFree on Sep 5, 2008 8:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Faith in the American People. But we must never have faith in the elites
Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
Comments are closed-
Posted by: counterpoint on Sep 5, 2008 10:36 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Palin's "family affairs" showcase scandalously counterproductive Republican and Evangelical policies
Posted by: dangerouslysane
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ohb0b on Sep 5, 2008 12:26 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ever since Goldwater's landslide 1964 defeat (in your guts, you know he's nuts), they have striven to keep the rad-con base under wraps during conventions, and appeal to rational people by putting on a moderate face.
But they are desperate this year. After eight years of being in charge, they can't run on the issues, so they have resorted to the tried and true Republican method of winning elections.
I'll admit, after Palin's speech the other day, for the first time I was worried. Here was a snarky, Coulteresque persona, feeding red meat to the wing-nut base. With the polls so tight, and the usual Republican voter suppression shenanigans, bringing out the nut-jobs may just push them over the top and we suffer four more years of failed Republican policies.
Then I had my faith restored by John McCain's bland, "we're Americans first, we'll reach out across party lines" centrist acceptance speech. Ah, the sweet reminisces of another candidate (whose positions McCain agrees with 90% of the time)who long ago ran as a moderate "compassionate conservative." How will they reconcile the two parties? Which Republican party will you vote for?
It is my day off, and I was listening to the car radio while running some errands. It was hilarious listening to a leader of the pro-choice Republicans trying to defend the ticket. Her logic: She expects the Democrats to retain control of Congress, and they "better damn well do their job" and block any radical Supreme Court nominations.Such a contortionist act will be hard to follow, but I'm looking forward to a lot more of them before the election.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Which Republican Party will you vote for?
Posted by: dangerouslysane
Comments are closed-
Posted by: p.ray on Sep 5, 2008 12:50 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rescue from bad owners is a positive step in the right direction. However, in shelters across the United States, Pit Bulls (or dogs that appear to be Pit Bulls) comprise a large portion of the shelter's population. Due to the stigma associated with the breed (and, often, because of overcrowding) many are destroyed.
However, as a self-described "Pit Bull with lipstick," (and in stark contrast to her espoused religious fundamentalism) Sarah Palin doesn't want to be saved!
Because she lacks both proper socialization and strong training, the only solutions possible are to: neuter, contain behind stong walls, muzzle in public and keep on a short strong leash, or euthanize.
Communities within the following US states have already or propose to ban Pit Bulls and other "Bully Breeds": Michigan, Utah, Missouri, Florida, Iowa, Washington, Colorado, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Ohio, Mississippi, Illinois, and Kentucky have already banned.
I suggest we follow their lead and --
BAN SARAH PALIN
Phala
BTW: This alleged pro-lifer conservationist continues to promte the illegal aerial killing of the truly endangered "lone wolves" of her own 'heartless' land. Joe Biden needs to take a page out of her poorly written playbook and eschew "fair-chase" morality, hunt from aloft, and tear her up!
I, for one, will gladly pay a $150 bounty for her "RIGHT front leg"!
Phala
Wake UP - Be NOT Afraid - This Eight Year-long Nightmare Will Soon Be Over!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Pit Bulls Banned Nationwide and Slated for Worldwide Eradication
Posted by: Pebbles
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Pebbles on Sep 5, 2008 2:05 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The McC-P gang has no right to protest. If they didn't want it to be an issue, Someone might have politely declined a spot on the ticket. You don't have to be a PR genius to see that this story is red meat for a broad range of interest groups. It would never have been an issue beyond (or possibly even within) the 49th state if the campaign hadn't made it news.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Gimme a break!
Posted by: dangerouslysane
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Sep 5, 2008 2:06 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Plan B
Posted by: edgar1
» RE: Plan B
Posted by: cdub
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Drclaw on Sep 5, 2008 3:27 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sabrina on Sep 5, 2008 7:39 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Richard
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Palin's Judgement in Question
Posted by: cdub
» RE: Palin's Judgement in Question
Posted by: katee
» Alaskan/U.S. cultural divide
Posted by: sheena2u
Comments are closed-
Posted by: onevoter on Sep 5, 2008 7:55 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cowardly, hypocritical bitch!
Which animal would Jesus shoot from a plane?
Have you ever heard of aerial hunting? It's a brutal practice. Wolves are shot from low-flying aircraft or chased to exhaustion, then killed at point-blank range.
Governor Sarah Palin, the Republican nominee for Vice President, promotes this barbaric practice, exploiting a loophole in the Federal Airborne Hunting Act to allow private wolf killers to shoot down wolves using aircraft. We have to get the word out about this!
Please watch this powerful video by Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund, and then share it with every wildlife lover you know:
http://actionfund.defenders.org/palinvideo
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Cannoliamo on Sep 6, 2008 6:00 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are the GOPers who are protecting Palin from the press the same right-wing conservatives who demanded press coverage of Whitewatergate and Paula Jones? Isn't this more a case of "use the press against your foes and protect your allies from negative press." Isn't this the same basis for the government propaganda campaigns that are rampant in so many illegitimate governments?
... just wondering.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Red Green on Sep 6, 2008 11:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wagnerrocks@gmail.com on Sep 6, 2008 3:23 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: stev90 on Sep 7, 2008 10:30 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sheena2u on Sep 8, 2008 12:42 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The treatment of Hillary Clinton by the Repubican extremists was base and sexist. Sarah Palin, herself, had the unmitigated gall to say Hillary was whining and basically needed to man up and "prove herself." These are not the words of a woman who deserves to be treated with kid gloves, or with deference.
The Republicans want it both ways. They want to persecute Hillary freely, and then they expect to bring forth an insultingly unqualified female candidate and say "Back off folks, be nice, play soft ball, don't even think of being mean to our little flower or we will screech 'sexism!'." Meanwhile they keep her sequestered away where they can cram her brain with as many short statements as possible so that she can parrot whatever they want her to say or do.
Less than two years ago she was not yet Governor of Alaska, and this is her primary claim to fame until now. Alaska is very much unlike the rest of the country, or America at large, and her experience as governor qualifies her in no way to the White House except in the ficticious imaginations of Republican spin doctors and zealots. Alaska is the largest state, and the second smallest in population. The problems of Alaska are entirely unlike those of the rest of the country. To say that she has international experience because Alaska borders Russia and Canada is a desperate stretch and an insult to everyone's intelligence.
Nor do her years as Mayor of Wasilla, then a town of less than 6,000 people qualify her to be Vice President. As Mayor she took a tiny town with no debt and saddled it with a debt of over two million, and she promoted unbridled development that was entirely out of character with the prior friendly charm and historic uniqueness of the area. It is now a charmless, polluted, and unattractive hodgepodge of box stores and gravel pits.
The choice of an unqualified woman who will be a parrot and a puppet to Karl Rove, Dick Cheney, and the Republican smear machine is an insult to the office of Vice President, and to intelligent women and men. Her selection was cynical, and an example of the very worst corruption and dishonesty in politics.
If this is an example of "change," then we must redefine the word to mean "the same old cynical machinations that represent the worst possible side of politics."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Double standard/hypocrisy
Posted by: mnstra
Comments are closed-
Posted by: stev90 on Sep 9, 2008 6:35 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just like 8 years of the failed policies of Bush/Cheney/Rove administration.
Same old, same old.
Guaranteeing the continued de-leveraging and financial meltdown of America.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: GOP McCain/Palin running on a flatform of hypocrisy, double standard and blatant lies.
Posted by: katee
Updated: Catholic Bishops Embrace Anti-Abortion Terrorizers Missy Smith and Randall Terry
10 Defining Feminist Moments of 2009
Going Undercover in the Crazy, Tragic World of Christian Gay-Conversion Therapy




