Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Reproductive Justice and Gender

Female Politicians in Comeback Runs Are Breaking Records

By Allison Stevens, Women's eNews. Posted August 2, 2008.


Sixteen women who lost congressional races in 2006 are running again. This could mark a new era in the evolution of the female political candidate.
womensenewslogo
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

BETHESDA, Md. -- Donna Edwards' June election to the U.S. House of Representatives was neither fast nor easy.

In 2006, Edwards tried to unseat Democratic Rep. Albert Wynn of Maryland, but she lost by fewer than 3,000 votes. "When I lost, I wanted to crawl under my bed," Edwards said earlier this month at the annual conference of the Washington-based National Organization for Women held in Bethesda, Md. "But I woke up."

Wynn, an African American who voted in 2002 to authorize the president to invade Iraq and Afghanistan, was too moderate for the heavily Democratic district in suburbs east of Washington, D.C., Edwards asserted.

Ousting him, she said, deserved a second try.

So Edwards, a lawyer and anti-domestic violence activist, staged a repeat performance of her 2006 campaign. Voters responded enthusiastically, giving her a 22-point victory over Wynn the second time around.

Wynn resigned in June, triggering a special election for the seat. Edwards won with 80 percent of the vote and now serves in Congress.

Edwards' persistence is unusual for female candidates, who tend to shut down the campaign office and return to pre-race routines after losing political contests, according to Gilda Morales, a researcher at the Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey in New Brunswick.

"Women kind of disappear after they lose," Morales said.

Long Road to Victory

After losing once, running a second race in the same district or state for the same office may seem futile. But often, a political loss is the first leg on a longer road to victory, an axiom well understood by male candidates ranging from Richard Nixon to Ronald Reagan. Indeed, repeat candidates often benefit from higher name recognition, established fundraising networks and experience gained from rookie mistakes.

"No question there's an advantage because you know what you did right and what you did wrong the last time," said Jonathan Parker, political director of EMILY's List, a leading political action committee in Washington that backs pro-choice Democratic women.

It's a lesson Edwards said needs to be learned by women. "For so many women who run for political office and lose, you may never see that person again. That needs to change."

Edwards' message appears to be catching on.

Sixteen women who lost congressional races in 2006 are running again in 2008, a record number of female comeback bids for congressional office that could mark a new era in the evolution of the female political candidate, Morales said.

Historically, women have sought political office after the death, resignation or retirement of husbands or male relatives, as was the case with presidential hopeful Sen. Hillary Clinton. That pattern began to change in recent decades, and today, many of the 88 women currently serving in Congress established political careers without following in the footsteps of male relatives.

Now women are running on their own initiative, sometimes for a second or third time.

New Outlook, Repeat Candidates

Several of the women who ran in 2006 have a better shot this time around, Parker said. He pointed to two women, both endorsed by EMILY's List, who are running for the same seat they lost before but under more favorable circumstances this time.

In 2006, Linda Stender of New Jersey and Mary Jo Kilroy of Ohio ran against GOP incumbents, both of whom are retiring this year. Because Stender and Kilroy have already run, they enjoy the edge in name recognition, fundraising and experience.

As of mid-July, Stender had $1.2 million in the bank, far more than the $81,000 reported by her GOP rival, state Sen. Leonard Lance. Kilroy also had $1.2 million on hand; her opponent, state Sen. Steve Stivers, had $880,000, according to CQ Politics, an online political journal.

Several other women are mounting rematches against the same incumbents they fought in 2006, but under more favorable conditions this time around, Parker said.

In Washington state, Democrat Darcy Burner is running again against Republican Dave Reichert, to whom she lost in 2006. Burner has a better shot this year because she can ride on the coattails of Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama, who is expected to carry Washington state, Parker said.

And in New Hampshire, former Gov. Jeanne Shaheen is running a second time for the United States Senate against GOP Sen. John Sununu, whom she lost to six years ago. This time, she hopes to capitalize on a Democratic tide that swept the state in 2006, when Democrats took control of both houses of the state Legislature for the first time since 1874.

All four races are considered too close to call by Charlie Cook, author of the Cook Political Report, a nonpartisan publication that tracks congressional races.

"There are real reasons these women candidates are running again," Parker said. "They're not just running to run."

Playing the Odds to Win

Other female Democrats also hope to take advantage of a more favorable national political climate.

Daily tracking polls of registered voters across the country conducted during the month of July by Gallup give Obama a 1- to 9-point lead over GOP nominee John McCain.

And 51 percent of registered voters surveyed in a national poll conducted July 25-27 by Research 2000 said they would favor a Democratic candidate for Congress, while only 37 percent said they would back a generic Republican candidate.

Female Democrats like Victoria Wulsin of Ohio and Sharon Renier of Michigan hope to capitalize on that trend. Wulsin is taking on GOP Rep. Jean Schmidt and Renier wants to oust Republican Tim Walberg.

Both women came close to victory in 2006, although none more so than Christine Jennings, a Florida Democrat who came within 373 votes of beating Republican Vern Buchanan. In that race, more than 18,000 ballots were not counted due to voter machine malfunction, giving Jennings hope that she will win this time around.

Meanwhile, two Republican women -- Melissa Hart of Pennsylvania and Anne Northup of Kentucky -- who lost their seats in the 2006 midterm elections are running to reclaim them now.

All of these races are considered competitive by Cook.

Other women are running longer-shot repeat campaigns, including Republicans Sydney Hay of Arizona, Deborah Honeycutt of Georgia and Charel Winston of California, and Democrats Judy Feder of Virginia, Diane Benson of Alaska, Nikki Tinker of Tennessee and Cristina Avalos of California.

Copyright 2008 Women's eNews. All Rights Reserved.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: politics, women, donna edwards, political candidates

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Reproductive Justice and Gender! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
WELLAWARE
Posted by: wellaware lec on Aug 2, 2008 4:41 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WONDER whether female politicians are bought with more difficulty than male politicians...since our perception of a 2 party system is basically a fancy reality show (reality shows may be more based on reality, actually). This may not be quite as exciting as this author makes it out to be, unless these candidates can then hang onto their hoped for/assumed integrity and be more sensitive and stalwart re. their constituency concerns/values.
Just because someone has a vagina and breasts, doesn't mean it's fabulous political news....but it's worth attending to along with alot of other issues in the world that are far, far more important than our Rep/Dem Reality Show...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't Play the Same 'good Ol' Boy' Games!!!
Posted by: Purple Girl on Aug 2, 2008 5:33 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
having cut my teenage teeth on Ms Mag and as an avid follower of Gloria- I am disgusted what has happen to the Womens movement. they have picked up the 'entitlement' ideology which the 'good Ol' boys' are so hated for.
Hillary's run for the WH was a prime example of voting for someone just because she was a White Female- where were all these so called 'Feminist ' when Mosley Braun was running?they were voting for the White Guys!
Then to cheer Hillary as she padded her Resume- according to her logic, I should be able to build anything, since my Husband is a carpenter!Or she was admitting to the charges which plagued Bills presidency- that they were Co - presidents and she was allowed to exercise more power and be privvy to far more sensitive info then any other spouse in History- Breach of Security?
When looking at her real voting record you can see she voted more like a Bush Cohort. Where was her voice when it came to the desecartion of our Rights & Freedoms under this Admin? Where is it NOW? How can she claim she could manage our Militry when she sat on th eComitte which allowed them to go on a wild goose chase, ill equpped and under manned? Where was she when returning service personnel were living in rat infested medical facilities, where was she when they were being denied adequate care? Where was her voice and outrage when it became apparent the Private mercenaries actions were placing our service people in harms way by their illegal killings? Where has she been regarding KBR's criminal liablity for electicuting our service people in the shower? What happen to the demand for a 'Exit Stratedgy'- her small attempt at appearing to demand Answers for the Troops and US.
Hillary was never qualified to be Pres, and actually was always nothing more then a water bearer for this Admin- A facade, a covert operative for the Corporationist.
So when women jump up to vote- they should heed a warning, just because they have a vagina- does not mean they are the best qualified, nor necessarily possess the highest ethic & Morals.
'Feminism' has become the 'pay backs a Bitch' term- deceptive and counter productive. A 'Libber' wants ALL an Equal Chance to compete on a LEVEL playing field- no bar lowering, no special priviledges for Anyone!
So i am glad to hear more women getting involved in Politics- but if they are nothing more than 'Good Ol' Boys' In Drag, they will NOT get my vote!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mary Jo Kilroy is NOT a good candidate
Posted by: SekhmetsatRa on Aug 2, 2008 5:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When Ms Kilroy was on the Columbus Public School Board, she NEVER once answered any letters, phone calls, or e-mails i sent(back then, the only response i got was from the late great Bill Moss). Nor does she as a county commissioner. WHY would she as a state rep to the national congress? I will always vote AGAINST her.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another MISinfoTAINTment BULLSHIT DUMBSHOW !
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 2, 2008 8:25 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It doesn't matter if the man is in office or if the woman is in office. The important thing is getting the job done ! Besides, take a look at the current women in office in Washington. How many of them are anywhere close to what you really expected of them? A sellout is a sellout regardless of gender. Now shut up and quit feeding in to the gender divide and please focus on REPAIRING the 3 decades of a languished progressive/liberal movement !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What we really need are more great female leaders like . . .
Posted by: 6399 on Aug 2, 2008 9:46 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nancy Pelosi!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You Forgot One:
Posted by: oregoncharles on Aug 2, 2008 10:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cynthia McKinney, formerly congresswoman from Georgia, is running again -

for President, on the Green Party ticket.

After being betrayed by the Democrats in the primary, twice, she learned her lesson and switched to a genuinely progressive party (and raised her sights).

Her website is www.runcynthiarun.org, and the party's is www.gp.org.

Overall, this article is good news. It's a bit of a puzzle to me that we don't have more women in Congress; they are, after all, a majority of the voters. Progress on this front is welcome.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama will lose in November unless he...
Posted by: HughScott on Aug 2, 2008 11:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
picks Senator Clinton for his running mate. And I'm not a Hillary fan.

Since that won't happen and my vote doesn't REALLY count, I'm trying to prepare myself for another four years of White House corruption -- under the "leadership" of President McCain.

For reasons why bitter Hillary supporters should NOT vote for the grumpy old senator, visit my new nonprofit Web site, www.UnfitMcCain.com

One of the reasons summarizes my investigation of "Songbird" McCain's behavior as a POW in North Vietnam. The facts-check shows how he distorted his so-called "heroic" war record and exploited it for political gain. Part of the information is based on my recent communications with a former POW.

If, after visiting UnfitMcCain.com, you agree with my findings and love America, please tell your friends and family about my Web site.

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam veteran, lifelong registered Republican and former McCain supporter-turned Obama fan.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Progressive Woman for Congress from Florida
Posted by: MBFLA on Aug 2, 2008 11:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In District 10 in Florida we have Samm (Denise) Simpson running in a primary against two men who switched parties to become Democrats to run against Samm in the primary on Aug 26. The winner of the primary will then face Republican Bill Young who has been in Congress FOREVER. Samm is a grassroots independent thinking Dem with an all volunteer staff who ran against Bill Young two years ago. She believes it is time for us to take our country back! Please see her web site at www.sammsimpson.com and help if you can!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHY NOT...
Posted by: ghost122 on Aug 2, 2008 6:32 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
vote for ME? Or at least send me $10 or so?!?! I'm running for Congress in Arizona's Sixth Congressional district and I'm a TRUE Progressive!! I am tired of the seat going to "the highest bidder" and firmly believe that the so-called "average" American should truly have a voice in Congress.

I'm running and I would like YOUR support! I may not be in your district, but every progressive we elect is one step further along to the kind of values we truly want in America rather than continuing to allow the corporate sharks to eat us alive.

Please visit http://www.schneider2008.com and drop me a note, send me some loot and let's boot the lazy, do-nothing, take-impeachment-off-the-table bums out!! We NEED people like ME in office. Why don't you help?

Rebecca Schneider, Progressive Candidate, AZ Congressional District Six, www.schneider2008.com, 480-833-5101, schneiderforcongress@gmail.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fundraising for women, Democractic leadership style
Posted by: lynmarenjensen on Aug 4, 2008 12:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not a Randi Rhodes fan, but she told this one story that seems relevant to how Democratic politics as it's now played discourages women candidates. She didn't mention names (for obvious reasons) but said it happened in Florida: A woman candidate asked for an official Democratic party endorsement. The party, or someone in the party, told her first she'd have to raise $1.5 million. She did it. Then they told her, now go to Emily's List. Raising $1.5 million got her the name and phone number of someone at Emily's List. Emily's list told her to raise x-number more dollars. She did. They told her to go back to the Democratic party. Rhodes dropped the story here, but left the impression that the woman never did get the party's endorsement. So, if what Rhodes said is at all typical, then all these women candidates mentioned above performed whatever fundraising feats they had to perform, and otherwise met whatever measure the Democratic party set to get this kind of national attention. We're left to wonder, what about women who'd make good candidates but don't have the fundraising ability, or otherwise aren't annointed as heirs apparent for a particular office?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How women finally won the privilege of voting
Posted by: Virginia Harris on Aug 4, 2008 6:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you are interested in the many exciting and surprising twists and turns that played into women winning the vote in England and America, I hope you will check out "The Privilege of Voting."

It is a new and exhaustively researched historical e-mail series that goes behind the scenes in the lives of eight well-known women from 1912 to 1920 to reveal the sexy, shocking truth of HOW the suffragettes won the vote.

Presented via e-mail in a unique, sequential, interwoven short-story format called Coffeebreak Readers - it makes discovering the delightful heroines of women's suffrage history easy and fun!

The women depicted include two of the most beautiful and outspoken suffragettes -- Alice Paul and Emmeline Pankhurst, along with Edith Wharton, Isadora Duncan, Alice Roosevelt, and two stunning presidential mistresses.

There are weddings and funerals, babies in peril, damsels in distress, war, peace, broken hearts and lots of hot affairs on the rocky road to the ballot box.

The best part is it's ALL true!

Each action-packed e-mail episode takes about 10 minutes to read, so they are perfect to enjoy on coffeebreaks, or anytime.

You can subscribe to receive free twice-weekly e-mails at:

http://www.CoffeebreakReaders.com/tpovpage.html

I would be interested to hear your opinion on the series should you choose to subscribe.

Best to you,


Virginia Harris
Series Author
Publisher
www.CoffeebreakReaders.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement