Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Reproductive Justice and Gender

Obama Gets on Topic with Women

By Kelly Nuxoll, Huffington Post. Posted July 13, 2008.


And he has help from Clinton, whose post-primary season message to her supporters is: Get over it and move on. I have.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

At a fundraising Women's Breakfast at the Hilton Hotel Thursday morning in New York City, the main plot concerned how the Democratic Party was going to address issues that traditionally matter to women and how much cash voters would pony up in return to help elect Barack Obama. The subplot was how Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, who appeared together, were getting along.

"Barack and I were talking about the rigors of the campaign trail," Clinton said a few minutes into her remarks. It painted a nice picture: the former rivals chatting backstage, bonding over their shared experience. Politicians are just like us! They make small talk. They try to be friends.

Obama told Clinton she looked somewhat rested. Clinton said she was, somewhat, and she was even trying to exercise every day since liberated from the grueling primary schedule. "As I'm sure you've read," she told the audience, "Barack Obama would get up every morning and go faithfully to the gym. I would get up every morning and get my hair done."

The crowd in the Hilton ballroom, a majority of whom were women, laughed.

"It's one of those Ginger Rogers, Fred Astaire things," Clinton said. Zing. Apparently, being friends does not mean that you can't also be just a little bit bitter.

Throughout her speech, Clinton re-iterated the message that women are working harder for less. Issues like wages, health care, and education are important for all Americans, but for women, she said, the stakes are higher: women remain discriminated against at work; women comprise the majority of low-wage earners and therefore also the majority of those without health care; women worry more about whether their children are getting a good education, whether class sizes are small, whether a motivated young person has an opportunity to go to college.

As has been true in her speeches throughout the primary season, Clinton's locus of attention was on the sort of person not likely to be among those eating her breakfast on a white tablecloth at the Hilton ballroom. Instead, Clinton insisted the Democratic Party would pay attention to those women who served in the hotel, getting up at the crack of dawn to go to work and leaving their children at home or in childcare, hoping they would be safe. Fairness is an American value, Clinton insisted, and for a moment I saw the old Hillary, with her jaw set and mettle in her voice.

But for most of the speech, Clinton's tone was soft and her language pitched somewhere between Oprah and Lifetime TV. She acknowledge how hard it was to "turn on a dime." Adjusting to new circumstances, she said, was "a process." It was time to "start a new chapter." The ballroom grew very quiet. Clinton seemed to be revealing something of herself, and it triggered at least in me a response that was half empathy, half fascination for the spectacle of a warrior defeated.

However, one is not taken into Clinton's confidence for very long. In an instant, the personal turned political. "Everyone who voted for me has so much in common with those who voted for Barack Obama," she concluded. There. She had said it: Get over it and move on. I have.

The power that Clinton seems to still wield with her supporters was somewhat astonishing. When Obama's sister, Maya, introduced him, she cited (predictably) the strong women in his life: herself, his mother and grandmother, his wife. "And then there's...um...Senator Clinton." It was a funny but revealing turn of phrase: on the one hand, Clinton was part of the family; on the other hand, she was something beyond it, a mythical force that loomed large in the imaginations of the Obamas.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: gender, women, clinton, obama, women voters

Kelly Nuxoll is a Bay Area freelance writer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Reproductive Justice and Gender! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I miss the good old days
Posted by: guesser on Jul 13, 2008 6:10 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Horribly written and lazily reported article. Of all the people in attendance, she mentions not only the restroom matron, but the only interview is with a Peruvian waitress? I hope she enjoyed the free lunch. Oh and I hope Obama picks Hilary for VP; I miss the good old days when she was involved, this McCain/Obama battle is already getting boring.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I miss the good old days Posted by: Love Me, I'm a Liberal
» RE: I miss the good old days Posted by: Katie Marie
» RE: I miss the good old days Posted by: jareilly
» RE: I miss the good old days Posted by: Starfall Deception
just the part referring to hillary's "getting her hair done", shows the sexist double standards
Posted by: cherylsass123 on Jul 16, 2008 8:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
like I was saying, hillary was 100% right about the double standard for both men and women. she had to get her hair done every morning during the primaries; while he[obama] went to the gym. anyway, it's good to see them working together, and well, I like what she told us supporters { just move on, I did} I still get daily e-mails via the " hillary-chain" from the woman volunteer organizer I worked with before the CT primary in early feb.; each one saying to contact all undecided to ask them to nominate the better canidate[ hillary]. now I wonder what this is leading up to with she and obama? why is she so willing to work closely with him??? vice president? pick me for the job??? [ then I'll still run in 2012!] I guess we'll see. the point is that SHE seems to understnad what it is like to be the "working schmuck" in america- the piece of shit "rent-a-slave" whom bags/carries out the groceries at publix; or cleans the piss and shit stained urinals and toilets for the big executives in those manhattan office buildings at just $10.50 an hour- part time/little if any benefits!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Horrible.
Posted by: Starfall Deception on Jul 17, 2008 3:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Clinton and Obama seem genuinely concerned. If McCain gets elected, I can kiss my womanly rights goodbye.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Horrible. Posted by: Blink
You'll never convince me that Lord Obama isn't a sexist of the worst order
Posted by: Blink on Jul 18, 2008 4:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A leopard doesn't change his spots overnight. His patronizing comment that Hillary appeared "somewhat rested" speaks volumes. Why does he have to pepper his comments with so many qualifiers, adjectives, and adverbs? God save us from an Obama presidency -- nee, Messiahship and National Scold, and Sexist Pig to boot!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

LETS GET REAL. BILL AND HILLARY SHOULD SPEND EVERY WAKING HOUR CAMPAIGNING
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Jul 21, 2008 3:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in all of those states that the democratic party has given up on. They would be under no obligation to mention Obama's name unless somebody else brought it up. Their campaign should be to get out the democratic vote. They should be saying "Vote a straight democratic ticket." If we don't get a heavily democratic congress next time our goose is cooked.

Hillary might be able to get something for the state of New York with a strongly democratic congress. Bill might finally get to see some of the things that 6 years of republican congress denied to him. We have had 12 consecutive years of republican congress.

I paraphrase, Will Rogers once commented that the republicans spend their time telling you how bad government is and if you put them into office they prove it to you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]