Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Reproductive Justice and Gender

Shaky Economic Times Are Shakier for Women

By Heidi Hartmann, The Women's Media Center. Posted June 19, 2008.


In general, women need to stretch their resources to accommodate more mouths to feed and more years to live than men.
Advertisement

Over the last three months, primary voters in increasing proportions have said this presidential election is about the economy. In November, if recent trends hold, women will vote in greater numbers than men. As both parties turn from the business of primaries to crafting their messages for the fall, they will need to address the economic realities of these women voters.

In a recent survey of Americans' economic insecurities, the largest difference in attitudes between women and men emerged on Social Security. Large proportions of both groups worry that social security benefits may be reduced or eliminated, but women are especially concerned, whatever their income level. Even women with very high family incomes ($92,000 and above) are worried. In fact it's at this highest income range that the gender differences are largest -- only about 30 percent of men at that level worry about Social Security's future, compared with 53 percent of women. It's also one area of economic security where white women are nearly as worried as minority women: across all income levels, 55 percent of white women and 58 percent of minority women worry that Social Security may be cut back.

What explains why even higher income women are so concerned about the future of Social Security?

Three seemingly immutable facts drive women's economic concerns, across class and race. First, women have the children and generally rear them to adulthood, whether men help out financially or not. Second, women earn less than men. Third, women live longer than men. These life conditions mean that women meet more demands with fewer resources -- they need to stretch their limited resources to accommodate more mouths to feed and more years to live. To be sure, many women share in men's higher earnings, through marriage for example, but not all women do, and not for their entire adult lives. Many women have learned that marriage is far from a sure ticket to life-long economic security.

Given these realities, shaky economic times always worry women more than men, and for good reason. Unemployment rates are nearly always highest for single mothers -- perhaps because they face more constraints on which jobs they can accept or encounter more discrimination in the labor market or both. In a survey of American Workers conducted in 2007 by Yankelovich at the request of the Rockefeller Foundation, one woman in five reported she lacked money to fill a prescription, one in eight said she could not afford to take a child to a doctor, and one in 14 said she went hungry in the past year. Women experienced these hardships at about twice the rate of men in the nationally representative survey.

Amidst these pressing daily concerns, women also worry they are not saving enough for retirement -- 63 percent of women overall, including 71 percent of those who didn't finish high school and 50 percent of those who graduated from college.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: women, economy, social security

Heidi Hartmann is a co-author of Women at Greater Risk of Economic Insecurity: A Gender Analysis of the Rockefeller Foundation’s American Worker Survey available from the Institute of Women’s Policy Research.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Reproductive Justice and Gender! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The news just gets worse
Posted by: www.suekatz.com on Jun 19, 2008 4:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks so much for this thoughtful piece. It is such a bummer that so many Boomers, especially women, are facing the last third of their lives with decreasing options and increasing insecurity. The one other factor is that even those who have conscientiously saved, now find their investments in the crapper. Sigh.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The news just gets worse Posted by: JSquercia
"women need to stretch their resources to accommodate... more years to live"
Posted by: Q30 on Jun 19, 2008 6:39 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In other words, the women live longer and are victims as a result. The shorter life-expectancy of men is only a bad thing because it prevents them from financially-supporting women.

There is a long-term solution to this problem: increase the life expectancy of men. But that would involve actually allocating resources to decrease the number of male deaths. But I imagine that the author of this peice would oppose such a measure, perhaps writing an article decrying the rank sexism of doing so.

I imagine that if American-style feminism were to catch-on in Saudi Arabia, Saudi women would demand the right to drive followed by demands for exemption from having to pay for gasoline.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The weird world of female reasoning - again!
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on Jun 19, 2008 9:12 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every once in a while, any guy dealing with a woman and the chaotic inferface between her mind and her emotions, must say "Let's see if I understand this."

Let's see if I understand: women can do anything men can do - right? But men have always held women down (you should pardon the possible double enendre), kept them from "career," promotion, pay, and all that greatness. "'Splain dat to me, Luci!"

Women can do anything men can do, but now that fuel prices are curtailing so many things powered by fossil fuel, women are having a much harder time. "Splain dat to my, Luci!"

A woman can do anything a man can do - she "needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle" (we all remember that wonderful witticism from 1960s and 1970s feminists, don't we?), but if the world has to go back to the time before fossil fuel made everything push-button, it will be much harder on women. "'Splain . . ."

Oh, never mind: just get yourself a bicycle, girls.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: and your mind-emotion connection? Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: and your mind-emotion connection? Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» Male Privilege Posted by: fork
» RE: Female Privilege Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: Female Privilege Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: Female Privilege Posted by: fork
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
» RE: Fuel Saving Solution for GULLIBLE Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: Fuel Saving Solution for GULLIBLE Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: Fuel Saving Solution for GULLIBLE Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: Fuel Saving Solution for GULLIBLE Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: Fuel Saving Solution for GULLIBLE Posted by: Walks-in-Storms