COMMENTS: 14
Hollywood Tells Women to Settle for Schlubby Losers
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Reproductive Justice headlines via email.
Her boyfriend/love interest is handsome, smart, well-educated, financially stable, adventurous and athletic. Sounds improbable right? A far-fetched fantasy that would never make it past a studio executive's assistant. Right? Now imagine that these characters are reversed; the bong-water drinking counterpart of our relationship is a man-boy, and the sexy smart sophisticate is a twenty-eight year old woman. Now that sounds like a movie. In fact, it sounds very much like every romantic comedy I have seen in the last year and a half. Now I may sound a little militant here, and for that I apologize but I have to ask -- WHAT THE F%$*? Why has the romantic comedy turned into more of a male fantasy than a female one? And why is Hollywood telling well-rounded, beautiful women, that we should just settle?
I live in Los Angeles, and as it goes, I have dated my fair share of drug-addicted, semi-employed losers (they're also called by another name -- "writers") and none of them has ever provided a happy ending. I know what you're thinking -- not everyone can end up with George Clooney (especially those of us who aren't former Vegas cocktail waitresses). But whatever happened to the handsome, slick, successful dreamboat who sure made some romantic faux-pas here and there, but always wound up doing the right thing? What happened to Michelle Pfeiffer ending up with Robert Redford? Or Catherine Zeta-Jones and George Clooney? Or Demi Moore and Rob Lowe?
Let it be noted, I am all for the nice guy. I want them to finish first. Every last one of them. I do. I really do. But why can't the nice, sweet guy bring anything else to the table? Hollywood is telling smart, successful, and sexy women everywhere the best that they can hope for is a "good" guy. What about hoping for our equivalent? Let's be honest: What the hell is Katherine Heigl doing with Seth Rogan? Seriously. Why, in Forgetting Sarah Marshall, can Jason Segal sob like a child, exhibit not an ounce of male prowess and still end up with hotter than thou Mila Kunis? The entire time I was watching that movie I wished that homeboy would just grow a pair. That film shouldn't have been titled Forgetting Sarah Marshall; it should have been titled How This Dude Got Sarah Marshall In the First Place and Life's Other Great Mysteries Solved.
Here I am, about to wave my feminist freak flag -- but the problem with Hollywood today is not the triumph of the nice guy, but the unbelievable triumph of the loser. The fantasy is no longer that you too can get the dreamboat package. Instead, it's that you too can make your mediocre slacker grow up. And guess what? That's the biggest fantasy of all. I've tried -- and it just doesn't work.
Stay up to date with the latest Reproductive Justice headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: QQOblivion on Jun 9, 2008 1:47 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those kind of movies are written by, and are for, guys like me: Lovable losers.
When not-so-hot women make movies about getting studly alpha males, then go see those movies.
I will refuse to ever see such a movie myself, though. (Actually, I detest ALL romantic comedies.) And I will delight in any bad reviews and box-office returns if the movie has those. (I am not against not-so-hot women. Not at all. But I am against studly alpha males.)
But as long as lots of lovable loser men are writers (as you yourself pointed out), then movies where the loser guy gets the delightful damsel will be the norm.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mcubed on Jun 9, 2008 4:24 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
! ! ! FUNNY ARTICLE ! ! !
I haven't seen any of these movies and don't plan to. I've also dated my share of guys who would be sort-of-partially-happy to have a second "mom" to take care of them (and to complain about!) Thank goodness I don't live in a time/place where that's an option I would consider.
It would be cool to have more movies that I would pay $$ to go see, but oh well. I guess I have time to read the pile of books over in the corner now.
Michele
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kamcallen on Jun 10, 2008 10:17 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Duh.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jingles on Jun 9, 2008 6:30 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: schlubby girls?
Posted by: LeeAnnG
Comments are closed-
Posted by: stellabloo on Jun 9, 2008 7:46 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Women get the obvious raw end of the deal ... They can be smart, funny, sexy and STILL think that they need a man to validate their existence. Most women are addicted to approval. Really, men find it oddly attractive when a woman doesn't actually NEED a man.
But men sell themselves short too with these images. What's so great about being an unfit slob? - except that it makes you the perfect male consumer.
God forbid, the last thing consumer culture wants is strong men AND women who can think for themselves ;.)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fanny666 on Jun 10, 2008 9:37 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
LINK
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: idmaster2000 on Jun 11, 2008 6:35 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You can't have it both ways. In our current culture of TV and movies, we have some sort of iron-clad generic convention that dictates that the women are all smart and far more clever than the men who are all morons.
I'm all for going back to the I Love Lucy genre where a helpless but attractive woman is constantly messing things up thus requiring her husband to scold her and guide her into fixing her ditzy mistakes.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MHerbert on Jun 14, 2008 7:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Landbaron on Jun 14, 2008 10:22 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rickiey on Jun 16, 2008 9:34 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Men are portrayed as bumbling fools, and women are portrayed as intelligent and beautiful.
I guess it's a "hey feminist movement, be careful what you wish for" sort of thing.
Myself, I'm insulted by these movies, and more insulted by sitcoms. But I believe that there should be equality for men too, as politically incorrect as THAT line of thinking is.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: whealeydj on Jun 22, 2008 10:33 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Greggymark on Jul 2, 2008 11:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Two Women a Day Die Giving Birth in America -- and Many of These Deaths Can Be Prevented
The Dark Side of Birth Control: The Pill Still Has Many Adverse Affects Glossed Over By Big Pharma
Moore and Maddow Agree: Things Are Pretty Screwed up




