Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Reproductive Justice and Gender

Child Care Gets a Special Mother's Day Promotion

By Jill Hindenach, Women's eNews. Posted May 5, 2008.


Child care is a long-neglected political issue. But this Mother's Day, a handful of advocates are putting it back on the radar screen.
storyimagethumbwomensenewslogo
For more Women's eNews, visit, www.womensenews.org. To subscribe to Women's eNews, the daily news service for all women, go to www.womenenews.org/join.cfm.
Advertisement

(WOMENSENEWS)--Federally funded universal child care can hardly be called an "issue" since it so rarely appears on the national political agenda.

But as Mother's Day approaches, some lonely advocates and lawmakers are trying to push the lack of quality, affordable child care--a key concern for many mothers--into this election year's headlights.

Sen. Bob Casey, a Pennsylvania Democrat, plans to introduce legislation Monday that would increase federal funding for child care programs to $10 billion in fiscal 2009, a huge increase from the current discretionary spending level of $2 billion.

Child care is "grossly underfunded," Casey spokesperson Larry Smar said, noting that only 1 in 7 eligible children receives child care assistance.

Nine advocacy groups have endorsed Casey's bill, including the National Association of Child Care Resources and Referral Agencies, the National Association for the Education of Young Children and the State Employees International Union in Washington, D.C.

If the measure doesn't become law this year, advocates hope to at least build momentum behind the issue.

Meanwhile, Moms Rising--an online group that advocates on behalf of mothers and families--is asking its 140,000 members to use Mother's Day to raise awareness about the high cost of child care and other workplace issues such as inflexible work hours and the lack of paid leave to care for family members.

The National Women's Law Center in Washington, D.C., and two dozen partner organizations came together on March 4 to "march forth" for more money for child care and Head Start, the federal early childhood education program for low-income families. Advocates across the country called and e-mailed more than 500 lawmakers with requests to increase investments in child care.

Expensive Essential

Many parents--especially single mothers--have trouble affording quality child care.

Child care fees at licensed centers reach as high as nearly $15,000 a year for infant care, according to the National Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies in Arlington, Va. All-day care for older children can cost as much as $11,000 a year, more than most U.S. families spend in a year on food or public college tuition.

Roughly one-quarter of "poverty spells"--a period of poverty two months or longer at a time--begin with the birth of a child, according to a 2005 analysis by the Washington-based National Partnership for Women and Families.

Low-income families who qualify for federal child care assistance have no guarantee they will receive help, according to the National Women's Law Center. In 2007, 17 states placed families on child care waiting lists, some lasting several months, due to lack of adequate federal funding for child care programs.

Families can expect some relief this year. Those filing 2007 tax returns were eligible for up to $2,100 from the federal Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit and other smaller credits varying by state.

But advocates and lawmakers want Congress to do more, especially as families come under increasing financial stress in the current economic downturn, said Helen Blank, director of leadership and public policy for the National Women's Law Center.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: mothers, working, child care, gender

Jill Hindenach is a freelance writer in Washington, D.C.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Reproductive Justice and Gender! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
CommonDreamer
Posted by: CommonDreamer on May 5, 2008 7:47 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder - when did it become fact that only mothers make families? Why is this a women's issue? Why are we not demanding a change in the corporatocracy that takes up too much of our time for less wages than ever - why are we settling for a stingy two weeks of vacation - still - this, after we have nearly every mother and father working? Why don't we get it down to 32 hours a week for everyone - a four day week - and let people have their family time back. After all, are we not all from families?

Life in the corporatocracy is only good for the top - those who can hire anyone and everyone it wants to take care of all of the more important things in life like family. But why would you want to do that - why do you want to consign your family to being raised by others? You could make it easier to do both...but first we must disavow allegiance to the corporatocracy and its anti-family policies.

Finally, why did we as women put down the most important thing in life - the family - by running off and accepting every platitude of the corporatocracy - that two weeks off is enough to renew oneself, to get every little thing done in life...and so on. I personally hate it...that I am going to miss (and already have) so many moments of my child's life because I can't have enough reasonable time off (just my two weeks...picking off an hour here and there..and pretty soon it's all gone and I have no flexibility).

Women and men need a break. Corporations need to re-think. This system is old, irrelevant and anti-family. It makes people sick and it makes them want to take mental health days (no wonder, when you get so few days off)...it's ridiculous to do this to OURSELVES. Women - stop admiring the corporatocracy - it needs to be changed - and you are sometimes the worst when it comes to understanding what the needs of a family are.

We need legislation to shorten the work week first (and no, it won't ruin the economy - because remember, we now have nearly double the work force of many years ago)...and we might be able to live as sensibly as Europeans if we'd just get our heads screwed on straight and know what's really important in life. And I for one would enjoy also not lining the pockets of the overpaid Wall Streeters and hearing them whine about how they can't afford another vacation home because Americans want to live a sensible life with shorter work hours.

While we're at it, let's re-define "success" and go back to the 1950s when we all had time for fun, family and enjoyment. Success does not mean maximizing corporate profits for overpaid Wall Street kingpins...it does not mean GNP....it does not mean building overblown McMansions and throwing everything you've bought away after two years because it's not new enough. This is sickness, not success.

First we need a re-do of the corporatocracy that has been looting our time and money and our family values. And yes, affordable childcare too - but only after we change some of these pressing issues first. We are still - STILL - working within the corporatocracy that has looted from us over the years and it's time to stop. It's time to respect family work first. Housework. Grunt work. You know, the important stuff, without which all of the great almighty glamour stuff WOULD NEVER HAPPEN.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: CommonDreamer Posted by: 23skidoo