Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Reproductive Justice and Gender

Maternal Profiling

By Anita Sarah Jackson, Huffington Post. Posted May 7, 2008.


Moms across the country face workplace discrimination, but the media has been largely silent on the issue.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg


When ABC did their story on maternal profiling, I was really glad about it. Not, of course, about maternal profiling, but the fact that a mainstream media outlet was picking up on this issue. Many of us talk about suspected maternal profiling (discrimination in the workplace due to parental status) with our trusted friends and family, but outside a couple of New York Times articles mentioning it (like this great one about a real mom in PA), there didn't seem to be much light shed on this publicly.



So, it was refreshing to know that the facts and real people's stories got airtime. Many of us have experienced discrimination in hiring because we're mothers, or family caregivers, or just have some regular responsibilities that mean we simply cannot be chained to our workplaces at any hour of the day or night. And many of you shared your stories right here. But I don't often see this covered in the media outside of a superficial, "mommy wars" kind of way.



On the ABC website, they posted an accompanying story highlighting stories of moms in Pennsylvania who had to face personal questions about their marital and parental status. So many of the comments following the stories are from moms who have been there. One pointed out that kids today are tomorrow's leaders, and even people without kids are going to be relying on them for services in the years to come. I really appreciated that-- it took the cliche that "children are our future" and made it concrete. Who will be our doctors, teachers, laborers, office workers in five, ten, twenty years? Yep, the current crop of 13 year olds and younger are going to hit adulthood sooner than we think. The time to parent them is NOW.



And let's be clear: no parent is asking for the moon here from their employers. No one is expecting special treatment. Heck, almost every other country in the world manages to provide family-friendly benefits like paid family leave, and the world economy isn't on the brink of collapse (well, not due to that!). So it's not impossible. We just need a shift in corporate culture and in the laws of the land (that's all!). A shift that recognizes that society does not rest solely on the fourth quarter earnings of a corporation. And let's recognize that employees don't come from nowhere-- we were all born to someone, raised by someone. Maybe come home to someone who shares our life. Those someones are our family.



Bottom line: We cannot expect society to keep rolling along as usual if we don't acknowledge the reality of the time and effort of child-rearing. Raising kids is work. It's labor that takes time like any other job -- even if you have a paid outside job, even if you have paid childcare. Whether you're working and have kids in childcare or are a full-time parent, you know that the work of parenting is as much labor as any job. And it's worth just as much, at least. It's time our society came to grips with that fact. So the more mainstream media tells it like it is, the better chances we have of developing a work culture in this country compatible with -- instead of working against -- family life.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: discrimination, sexism, parenthood, motherhood

Anita Sarah Jackson is a mother of an 18 month old and pregnant with the family's second child. Anita earned her BA from UC Berkeley and JD from American University's Washington College of Law, studying international human rights. She is employed in two part-time jobs, one for MomsRising.org.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Reproductive Justice and Gender! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The pendulum swings
Posted by: Crazy H on May 7, 2008 10:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It wasn't so very long ago that corporations discriminated against single people. They felt that married people were more stable and reliable.

Now they feel that a family takes valuable time away from work ... why, it's just like stealing from the company!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CommonDreamer
Posted by: CommonDreamer on May 7, 2008 8:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, childcare is not a women's issue. It is a family issue. Men make families too and today I see men struggling with time constraints quite a lot.

We really need to fix this antiquated corporate system that is based on men working outside the home and women working inside of it. It is not relevant to family lives as it does not address the need to have much more time off than two weeks per person and flexibility is not available to those who need it the most - the poor and lower middle classes.

We really could afford to cut the work hours down for all workers (never mind that Wall Street would cry in its collective beer over not being able to line its pockets quite so much). I think the work week should not be more than four days; after all, there is no one at home taking care of the other 40-80 hours of work in the home and that's aside from taking care of the children. 32 hours is more than enough and the economy would adjust to this just as it adjusted to women entering the outside workforce in many more numbers years ago. Remember, we have added so many to the workforce since women chose to work outside the home in force.

I always preface the type of work with "inside" or "outside" the home because it is all work - and it should all be respected. I don't think we need to let men off the hook here and many men would like to participate more.

This though is really a great article and brings on the important points that we are all from families. Why do we do this to ourselves? A corporation is not family friendly - it is profit driven and there is not much common ground here at all. The entire idea of what an economy is, what a oorporation should do - the idea of how much time off people should have (and what about self renewal time?)....all of these things need to be refashioned in the modern world.

The Europeans are light years ahead in their policies. Wall Street wants you to believe that things are so terrible over there (and they are terrible if you're incredibly greedy and want nothing more than to work people to death for profits). But what I saw on a visit there was a lot more family friendly and I saw the most beautiful and healhty and happy people there. I know it is not perfect and certainly they have to do a lot to integrate opportunities for all, especially the poorest immigrants who live in the slums....but the idea is right. However, this kind of ideal and family friendly environment cannot co-exist with the kind of greed engendered by the rabid capitalist system we have in place.

Thus the capitalist system has to be tempered - either with legislation - or by other means - in order to modernize it. In all it would make a happier, more sane and healthy society. But first we must recognize that it is all about families and not about one sex or the other. This debate should be about what constitutes a healthy society and what can be done to bring it about - specifically disempowering corporations enough to bring them into some kind of reasonable operating mode. And we must rework the profit model - surely there are other benchmarks of a successful society. I think we have seen the devastation and damage that the sole focus upon GNP and profits has brought us. This kind of system benefits only the top. Now that the other half of America has been wrung out by anti-family policies, by subprime wages, the promulgation of shopping as Soma, the push to buy things way out of their league...now that we are all exhausted by the bogus and insane trickle down economics that have depressed wage earners everywhere, then perhaps we can focus on issues like these to rebuild America. And corporations definitely need a re-do in their focus - in every way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I wish
Posted by: luckypuck on May 8, 2008 12:55 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“We just need a shift in corporate culture and in the laws of the land (that's all!)” is a great idea and would solve most, if not all, of our nation's gravest problems.

But, don’t anyone hold your breath. Why? Because, thanks to nearly eight years of Cheneybush, corporate culture IS the law of the land.

I know it's preaching to the converts, but in November vote Democrat to get the shift started.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Are you kidding?
Posted by: Farasien on May 9, 2008 5:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's be honest here... corporations, most of them, anyway, are bending over far enough to kiss their own ass for parents these days, and and the trairots in office are in full support of it. If you have kids, you can get off largely whenever you 'have' to. Have a family emergency? Go! The suckers at the office will pick up your slack (and at no extra charge!). If a single or childfree person wants to take off time for some reason, even for an actual emergency, they often get the shaft. America pays people, in the form of tax credits, to have kids. The childfree? Singles? We get taxed HARDER. Also, let's play devil's advocate here a second... there are businesses that depend on regular schedules. If you work in such a job, especially knowing that it is that kind of environment, why should accomodations be made to you for a personal CHOICE you've made for yourself? For a handicap or other issue its valid, but this? Few employers are willing to accomidate someone if they choose to take a class or work charity functions in the middle of the workday. Why? Because its a lifestyle CHOICE they made for themselves. Children are no different in this era of well-understood reproductive science and ready access to birth control. There are some areas in life where you have to make a choice and are forced to go one way or the other. If you go the route of parenthood, you should be prepared to pay the price of it, and complaining about the consequences of the choice you made is really nothing short of pathetic. If you can't do the time, don't do the crime.

As to the argument that the 'heroic' parents are raising the next generations leaders... So what? Leadership takes strong character, and unlike what the pop-child pshcologists tell you, that can't be 'parented in'. Its quaintly nice that the yuppie parents of today seem to care so much for the future that they are willing to screw up the present, but the adults of this generation have to live here now in the conditions that exist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Are you kidding? Posted by: CommonDreamer
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement