Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Reproductive Justice and Gender

Anti-Choice Zealots Chase After Patients' Private Medical Records

By Katherine Spillar, Ms. Magazine. Posted May 7, 2008.


With anti-abortion forces bearing down on him, Dr. George Tiller fights for his patients' privacy -- and their lives.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

This article is reprinted from Ms. Magazine.

Mary was more than 22 weeks pregnant in 2003 when she was told the baby she was carrying had a rare and severe fetal abnormality that would cause it to live in a vegetative state, if it survived at all. In disbelief, she consulted with several additional doctors and specialists hoping there had been a mistake; this was a long-hoped-for pregnancy. But in the final analysis, with the support of her partner, she decided she would terminate.

For women like Mary (not her real name) who are diagnosed with severe fetal anomalies late in their pregnancies, or whose late-term pregnancies threaten their health, there are few doctors and clinics willing to perform later-term abortions. In order to get the medical care she needed, Mary had to travel from her home in the Midwest to Wichita, Kan., where she was seen by Dr. George Tiller of Women's Health Care Services.

Having received "compassionate" care at the clinic, Mary was distressed to learn earlier this year that a Wichita grand jury, investigating whether Tiller had violated Kansas abortion laws, had subpoenaed the private medical records of approximately 2,000 patients who had visited Women's Health Care Services over the previous four and a half years. The grand jury had been convened as a result of a petition drive by Kansans for Life and the extremist anti-abortion group Operation Rescue, who gathered more than the roughly 4,000 signatures required under an 1887 state law that allows citizens to empanel grand juries.

The Center for Reproductive Rights, a nonprofit legal advocacy group, now represents the 2,000-some women patients in their efforts to halt the grand jury's access to their medical records. "This is nothing more than a fishing expedition spurred on by anti-choice zealots," says Bonnie Scott Jones, the Center's lead attorney on the case. "It has nothing to do with any legitimate investigation of possible crimes -- it is simply a gross and cruel intrusion on extremely private moments in the lives of these women and their families."

Mary and several other former patients have submitted official affidavits in support of the Center's lawsuit to quash the subpoena, fearing that their personal records, once placed in the hands of a grand jury, could also find their way to the general public. And they have good reason for concern: During a prior grand jury investigation of Tiller, evidence was disclosed by a member of the grand jury to Operation Rescue. Having already endured "highly aggressive" harassment by anti-abortion protesters when she visited Tiller's clinic, Mary worries about the safety of herself and her family if her identity becomes known. "I am being forced to open these wounds in a new and fresh way, to relive it like this," she explains in her affidavit.

Operation Rescue is also trying to insert itself into the current grand jury investigation: When the organization's president, Troy Newman, testified before the grand jury, he offered photographs of patients taken with a high-powered lens as they entered Tiller's clinic. He says he urged the grand jury to subpoena and examine Tiller's patient records from a four year period, between 2004 and 2007. Shortly after his testimony, the grand jury issued its subpoena of the patient records.

"This latest grand jury is part of a new strategy of anti-abortion ideologues to use the court system as a tool of harassment and abuse of Dr. Tiller and other Kansas abortion providers," says Laura Shaneyfelt, of Monnat & Spurrier, one of Tiller's lawyers. She points out that previous attempts to prosecute him for violations of Kansas abortion law have been resolved in his favor -- but his opponents appear willing to stop at almost nothing to drive Tiller out of practice, in court or out of it.

In 1985, Tiller's clinic was bombed, causing $100,000 in damages. In 1991, it was the target of Operation Rescue's "Summer of Mercy" siege for more than six weeks; U.S. Marshals were eventually ordered in by the district court judge when local police failed to keep the clinic open. In 1993, Tiller survived an assassination attempt by an Army of God follower who had participated in Operation Rescue's 1991 blockades, suffering gunshot wounds in both arms. His clinic has also been vandalized and his staff tracked to their homes, their garbage rifled through.

So intense is the focus on Tiller that Newman moved to Wichita from Southern California in 2002 with the declared intention of closing down the clinic. Former Kansas Attorney General Phill Kline, an ardent opponent of abortion, has been on a similar mission. For more than two years, Tiller was relentlessly investigated by Kline, who ultimately filed 30 criminal counts alleging Tiller illegally performed later abortions. All the charges were eventually dismissed by a state court judge -- and now Kline has been criticized for allegedly withholding exculpatory evidence when he filed his charges.

Kline was defeated in his re-election bid (see "What's Up With Kansas," Ms., Spring 2007), but his successor charged Tiller with 19 new misdemeanors, claiming that he failed to follow Kansas law when securing the second opinion required for later-term abortions. Each charge carries a maximum sentence of one year in jail and a $2,500 fine, and could cost Dr. Tiller his medical license.

Tiller's attorneys maintain he is innocent, and also that the Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (the state's medical oversight body) knew and had approved of his practices in regard to second-opinion physicians.

Moreover, his attorneys believe that the statute requiring a second Kansas physician's approval of an abortion violates the federal and state constitution since it infringes on a physician's right to practice medicine and places an unreasonable burden on a woman's right to access a lawful abortion. "Every challenge to a state law mandating a second approving physician has been held unconstitutional," says Shaneyfelt.

Although Dr. Tiller remains the primary target of anti-abortion extremists in Kansas, Operation Rescue, along with other anti-choice groups, also gathered enough signatures to empanel a grand jury to investigate the Planned Parenthood clinic in Overland Park, a suburb of Kansas City. Following a court fight over patient records similar to that in the Tiller investigation, that grand jury disbanded in early March, concluding there was no evidence of criminal wrongdoing.

However, the relentless Phill Kline, now the appointed district attorney for Johnson County (which includes Overland Park), has recently charged the Planned Parenthood clinic with 23 felonies and 84 misdemeanors, alleging the clinic falsified records and performed illegal late-term abortions. Planned Parenthood is vigorously contesting these charges.

Meanwhile, the Kansas State Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments about the records subpoenas from Tiller's office in April; it's unclear when it will make a ruling. If the anti-abortion forces succeed in their mission to close down Tiller, the impact will be far from local. It will reverberate around the country, as women like Mary will lose one of the last places they can turn to for help.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: reproductive rights, late-term abortion, operation rescue

Katherine Spillar is the executive editor of Ms. Magazine.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Reproductive Justice and Gender! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
Hypocrisy and Misogyny
Posted by: AlexLawyer on May 7, 2008 1:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm willing to bet that most of these so-called pro-lifers support the Iraq war and the death penalty, and are against Medicaid for poor children. They love fetuses, but lose interest in them postnatally.

The only reference to abortion in the Bible, in Leviticus, says that if someone strikes a pregnant woman and causes her to abort he has to pay damages to her husband. But the penalty for murder in Leviticus is death by stoning; obviously abortion inflicted on an unwilling woman is considered a form of property damage. Aside from the misogynist implication of the scripture, it's clear that abortion was not considered murder. And abortion (along with homosexuality) was rampant in the Roman Empire of Jesus's time, but nowhere is he recorded as commenting on those issues--and surely we'd find it recorded if he had been anywhere near as concerned about them as many of his putative followers today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hypocrisy and Misogyny Posted by: DonnaSchlesinger
» RE: Hypocrisy and Misogyny Posted by: vasumurti
» That's because it's a bunch or crap Posted by: ReallyBearish
» RE: follow your own advice Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: absolutely correct Posted by: morticia
» RE: absolutely correct Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: absolutely correct Posted by: emmas
» vasumurti, old chap.... Posted by: morticia
» RE: Hypocrisy and Misogyny Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: Hypocrisy and Misogyny Posted by: starless
Hypocrisy and irony
Posted by: John Annis on May 7, 2008 4:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll bet that the majority of these interfering twerps scream bloody murder about the way that the fundamentalist Islamic sects treat women.

I am perennially puzzled as to how they justify their assumed right to judge how other people should live their lives.

Obviously they have nothing in their own lives that would not withstand scrutiny by others. Lucky them, to be so perfect.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is a privacy issue
Posted by: redceres on May 7, 2008 5:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So even the pro-life zealots should be able to recognize that subpoenaing private medical records in hopes of bullying or blackmailing women and doctors should not be promoted as an answer--or even a weapon--in this battle.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

someone else's shoes
Posted by: ipgirl77 on May 7, 2008 5:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is certainly a privacy issue, fuelled by fundamentalists disregarding the respect and understanding deserved by people in this specific situation. I suppose that they are spending quite a large amount of their time hounding staff and patients of the clinic. It should be suggested that instead, they volunteer themselves to help care for severely disabled children and their families. Perhaps insight is what's required here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The mislabelled "pro-lifers" have no belief in the QUALITY OF LIFE.
Posted by: maxpayne on May 7, 2008 6:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's one thing to be alive. It's another to have a quality of life that makes life worth keeping. As was proven in the article, when a life is bound to fail and all signs point to it, what's wrong with the mother deciding to terminate a poor quality fetus that is bound to have no life once born? It's not as if the so-called "pro-lifers" would fight for better healthcare, better education, less war and wmds, etc ... It's no coincidence that the same "pro-lifers" are pro-WAR, pro-pollution, pro-DeathPenalty, anti-education, anti-labor union, etc ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: QUALITY OF LIFE Posted by: Lector
» RE: QUALITY OF LIFE Posted by: emmas
» RE: QUALITY OF LIFE Posted by: goatini
» RE: QUALITY OF LIFE Posted by: maxpayne
» Known by the company you keep. Posted by: wolfgangmo75
Abortion is a legal right
Posted by: toots on May 7, 2008 7:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I lived in Wichita most of my life and the demonstrations and yelling at the women who were already under stress making a decision to abort was awful. Some of the men were seem on TV and x wives reported them to be picked up for lack of child support. (They were not even caring for their own children)
Over 10 yrs ago when I still lived there, a woman shot the Dr.
The right to life org bought a house next to the clinic so they could harass people. I no longer live there but remember how awful the right to life people were.
Abortion is LEGAL IN THIS COUNTRY***
No ones records should ever be violated, this is a private matter between the patient and the DR.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Human stupidity never ceases to amaze me.
Posted by: the baron on May 7, 2008 8:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"organization's president, Troy Newman, testified before the grand jury, "he" offered"

I thought women were referred to as "she". Silly me. Also you bible nuts obviously didn't read the article the baby would have been born still born or born a vegetable.

As for this Bible quoting dribble.

"As the government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen [Muslims] … it is declared … "
“The United States IS NOT a Christian nation any more than it is a Jewish or a Mohammedan nation.” John Adams founding father.

SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE learn it people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

An easily proven fact
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on May 7, 2008 8:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is that anti's of any sort are only anti till it comes to their rights and/or property.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

can't resist again...
Posted by: ellie on May 7, 2008 9:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as I've said a billion times before, it should be MANDITORY for ALL pro-lifers to willingly adopt the children born that the parents never wanted in the first place... in this country, we don't look at what happens after the birth, so pro-lifers, pony up your health insurance for your newly adopted kids who may have severe and expensive health care problems not to mention the costs that goes along with having another mouth to feed in the house...

pro-lifers, if you're not willing to adopt unwanted kids, shut up and go away!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: can't resist again... Posted by: january37
» Yes. It's okay. Posted by: redceres
The State Owns Your Body
Posted by: mgloraine on May 7, 2008 9:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The anti-choice goon squads are one symptom of a broader campaign of oppression being conducted by BushCo & the corporations in league with extreme right-wing religionists. The ultimate goal is for the corporatist/religionist (fascist) State they envision to OWN and CONTROL ABSOLUTELY all human bodies within reach of their totalitarian regime.

A woman can't get an abortion because the State owns the fetus; they will need that body to be conscripted for some future war, so her issues and concerns are overruled. Since they also own the body of the pregnant female, they have no qualms compelling her to carry the pregnancy to term regardless of the health risks or socio-economic stress it creates.

The BushCo State can kidnap your body from the street or your home, carry you off to a CIA dungeon or torture chamber, hold you without charges or legal recourse indefinitely, then torture you or beat you to death at their whim, as has been demonstrated thousands of times just since 2000. So they consider it no big deal to compel women to become pregnant by witholding or outlawing all means of birth control, then forcing them to give birth for the benefit of the State. The BushCo Lebensborn Project.

Citizens' access to safe, legal abortion is a very important front in the People's War on corporatist/religionist fascism and its erosion of our civil rights. It's not "just a women's issue".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fire with Fire
Posted by: DaBear on May 7, 2008 9:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Someone needs to publicize the medical records of the pro-lifers, and the sordid details of their pathetic daily activities, especially their "sins".... fight fire with fire. The only thing these "people" understand is brute force authoritarianism. Let 'em have it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I love how these ancient issues are spun into the leading issues by Ms.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on May 7, 2008 9:58 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Try this.

Enter the following into a google search box

"Gloria Steinem" New York Times 1967 CIA

Abortion is a puff issue, aimed at providing a basis for the "left-right" split that provides the Curtain Frame for the well-managed and controlled American Political Stage.

Efforts to bridge the gap on this issue are the subject of even greater vitriol than the other side - a dead giveaway as to what the real agenda of the backers of each side is.

Every woman who ever got an abortion wishes she never got pregnant, right? That's the basis for a shared attitude for both the left and the right, isn't it? Both sides must agree that a reduction in the overall number of abortions is a good thing, right?

There are those who fight against such efforts to communicate and reach out, because their main goal is just to keep the fight going, so that the TV pundits have something to talk about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

self-defeating idiots !
Posted by: Last Chance on May 7, 2008 2:07 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those misogynistic zealots don't realize they are promoting a population explosion of the very people they have most reason to fear, the flood of illegal aliens whose low-wage labor traps everyone in a race to the bottom. But it looks like they would rather die than think !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: self-defeating idiots ! Posted by: Last Chance
thekidde
Posted by: thekidde on May 7, 2008 4:22 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My fondest wish (for many years) has been that the 12-year-old daughters of all anti-abortionists should become pregnant by rape via a besotted, diseased derelict under a bridge. Unfortunately, this would punish only the poor daughters as I'm certain the brain-dead parent(s) would insist on the pregnancy resulting in a child that they would raise with loving care right?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Don't Care About Fetuses Or Christians At All
Posted by: LMNOP on May 7, 2008 6:38 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These arguments are tiresome. I've decided that I don't care when life begins. I don't care if a fetus is human. I don't care if it has a nervous system, or if it squirms during its abortion. I don't care if it has a beating heart.

I just don't have any interest in unwanted fetuses or what's best for them. I don't care if they're citizens. If they're citizens, then they're citizens that I don't care about and that I would confer no rights to.

I don't care if my values offend Christians or anybody else. They're my values, I don't have to justify them to anyone or be concerned if they are abhorrent to some people. Anybody that doesn't like them needn't ascribe to them. I am comfortable with them, and apparently, so are many tens of millions of other Americans and hundreds of millions if not billions of other people.

There really is nothing more to discuss on the subject with Christians. There is nothing left for any Christian to argue. There is no principle to invoke. Christians are free to go ahead and fight as hard as they care to get the abortion laws overturned. But I'm not interested in the same tired arguments that people that I don't respect have been making for decades, arguments that didn't move me in the 70s, or the 80s, or the 90s, and they still don't move me now.

Nor do I have a problem with what Christians call judicial activism. And I don't care what Christians or anybody else think the Constitution says. The Constitution is passé anyway. And I certainly don't care about Jesus or the Bible. I don't care what Christians think any more than they care about what I think.

What do I care about, one may ask?

I care about pregnant mothers with unwanted fetuses growing in them and ensuring that they have access to safe abortions. I care about family planning, even if it entails abortion. I care about overpopulation. I believe that it still doesn't get to be born without the consent of the mother. For me, the welfare of the born trumps the interests of the unborn.

They have fingers and toes? I don't care.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Thank you Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: Thank you Posted by: LMNOP
Remember "Save Our Unborn Troops"?
Posted by: january37 on May 7, 2008 7:22 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was at the 1991 counter protest at Tiller's Kansas City clinic. While we were standing on the sidewalk an airplane flew by trailing a banner that said "Save Our Unborn Troops".

One day at American Women's Clinic in Chicago an anti (that is what we called the anti-sex, -women, -fun, -humanity, -nonChristians, -whatever people) stuck his head around the fence and yelled at a woman going into the clinic, "We don't have enough people to fight the war now!!"

Just thought you might enjoy those two "pro-life" anecdotes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rob
Posted by: leoforward on May 8, 2008 11:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder if anyone has considered going after these abusive anti-abortion groups who harrass and encourage violence the same way the KKK groups were pursued and bankrupted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's one for the pro-life serial-poster. . .
Posted by: redceres on May 8, 2008 12:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . .who asked whether pro-lifers not adopting babies makes it okay for a pregant woman to have an abortion.

Yes. It's okay.


Whether or not people who want to send women back to the stone age adopt the children that their co-conspirators abhor after birth does not alter my opinion on this subject whatsoever.

A fetus is not a baby. You can (and probably will) continue to call it one until you're blue in your red-state face, but it's not.

A woman, a girl--these are living, breathing human beings. They have rights. And specifically because women world-wide are still oppressed by the violence of men, male-complicit women, and cultural ignorance, it must ALWAYS be illegal for the state to step in on a woman's pregnancy.

And YOU don't even really believe a baby and a fetus are the same thing, anyway. If you had a toddler and were several months pregnant and were placed in a situation where you could only save the life of one, you would NEVER choose to let the REAL, living child die over the fetus.

Because they're not equal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» No. Posted by: redceres
» To clarify. . . Posted by: redceres
stalking and harassment are legal now?
Posted by: luzmejor on May 10, 2008 8:35 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A special right to commit the above crimes are actually what RTL is demanding from our legal system. That particular activity is sanctioned by right-wing sex churches.

Some of these bigots are disappointed former and present fellow-travellers of neo-nazis, anti-communists and sex criminals.

I've met men who brag of calling ex-felons to help them act as threatening picketers at women's clinics such as Planned Parenthood.

I've met two such men at clinics (I wrote a published series) who identified themselves to me as former felons who were convinced that harassing women would help get them into heaven, despite their former crimes. I spoke to the priests who led and sanctioned the picketing.

All of these people regard anything but perpetual virginity a serious crime, but mainly it is a crime of women only.

Of course, it is crazy, but a lot of religious belief is!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

abortion, DNA cataloguing, personal records & BigPharma scandals...
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on May 12, 2008 9:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good to know that GOVERNMENT HAS OUR BEST INTERESTS AT HEART



DNA tracking: Horrifying new abortion legislation passed in South Dakota

===

American social pressure drives Canadian Parliament to PASS FETAL PERSONHOOD LAW
Gee, thanks. Just what we needed. More Americanization of our culture & domestic policies.

goodie.

===

how dare you INQUIRE!: "Newfoundland government questions inquiry counsel's right to cross-examine witnesses" in BigPharma's EXPENSIVE & UGLY Tamoxifen breast cancer scandal

~~~
Spread Love...

BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian com
~~~
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
~~~
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"
"do no harm"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement