REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 15

The American Health Care System is Failing Women of Color

A United Nations committee has expressed concern about "wide racial disparities" in sexual and reproductive health in the United States.
March 11, 2008  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Reproductive Justice headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 
Originally posted at RH Reality Check.

It's not every day that the United States is reprimanded on the international stage for racial discrimination. And it's certainly not every day that part of the charges includes discrimination against women of color in the area of reproductive health care. But one day before International Women's Day, a United Nations committee expressed concern about "wide racial disparities" in sexual and reproductive health in the United States. The Committee was responding to pervasive and dramatic disparities between the reproductive health of women of color and white women. Its comments reflect a triumph for reproductive health activists in the struggle to have the reproductive health needs of minority women taken seriously.

The Committee's conclusions were issued at the close of a two-week session in Geneva, Switzerland, during which it reviewed the U.S.'s compliance with the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD), a human rights treaty which requires that countries take pro-active measures to address racial inequalities. It was no surprise that during the session the U.S. was grilled about the persistence of racial segregation in public schools, the dismantling of affirmative action, and racial discrimination in the criminal justice system. But the session also provided a unique opportunity to focus on the less publicized but equally pervasive issue of racial discrimination in reproductive health care.

Not surprisingly, the U.S. initially refused to even acknowledge the stark differences in access to quality care between white women and women of color -- despite indicators like shockingly high numbers of women of color dying during childbirth and record numbers being infected with HIV/AIDS. Instead, it was U.S. activists who shed light on the overwhelming evidence of systematic racial discrimination in the U.S. in reproductive health care.

Nancy Northup, the president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, testified before the Committee on February 18 and addressed how women of color have significantly poorer sexual and reproductive health than the majority white population. While that's not a newsflash to many of us, the data can be alarming:


  • African-American women are nearly four times more likely to die in childbirth than white women, 23 times more likely to be infected with HIV/AIDS and 14 times more likely to die from the disease.

  • American-Indian/Alaskan Native women are over 5 times more likely than white women to have chlamydia and over 7 times more likely to contract syphilis.

  • The unplanned pregnancy rate among Latinas is twice the national average; and Latinas are much more likely to contract human papillomavirus, the infection that leads to cervical cancer.



These disparities speak to the significant barriers women of color face in obtaining reproductive health services. Across the board, racial and ethnic minority women are less likely than white women to have adequate prenatal care, a full range of contraceptive choices, or a timely and affordable abortion. Even more disheartening -- U.S. policies have not only failed to narrow the disparities, but have exacerbated them.


  • More young African-American females and Latinas than white women are given abstinence-only instruction in school, instead of comprehensive sex education. This means they aren't taught about contraceptive use to prevent pregnancy or protect against HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Abstinence-only programs have proven ineffective, and in some cases counter-productive, but every year the government has increased their funding dramatically, now totaling $176 million annually.

  • Although the U.S. has the resources to reduce maternal deaths and has acknowledged the importance of prenatal care to prevent them, it has adopted policies which force women to delay pregnancy-related care or forego it altogether. Unreasonable requirements for Medicaid like the 5-year bar on benefits for legal residents prevent many immigrant women from receiving even basic services.




Not only did the Committee recognize the need for the U.S. to take action to address racial disparities, it rejected the government's argument that the poor health outcomes arose from behavioral choices rather than government policy choices that fail to address American citizens' human right to adequate reproductive health care. In order to address these needs, the Committee recommended that the U.S.: (1) improve access to pre- and post-natal care, including by eliminating eligibility barriers to Medicaid, (2) facilitate access to contraceptive and family planning methods, (3) provide adequate sexual education aimed at the prevention of unintended pregnancies and STIs.

It's fitting that these recommendations came on the eve of International Women's Day, the nearly century-old commemoration of the worldwide battle to ensure equal rights for women on issues like work, voting and abortion. The Committee's comments are a victory for reproductive health advocates and women of color. Now it's time for the U.S. to stop making excuses and to adopt health care policies to ensure that the basic rights of women of color to reproductive health care.
Cynthia Soohoo is the director of the domestic legal program at the Center for Reproductive Rights. Katrina Anderson is a Litigation Fellow in the Domestic Legal Program at the Center for Reproductive Rights.
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Reproductive Justice headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: race, health care, reproductive health, reproductive justice


Comments are closed-

"No one knows anything unless they school teaches em, except me of course"=Elitist snob
Posted by: rickiey on Mar 11, 2008 7:04 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
American-Indian/Alaskan Native women are over 5 times more likely than white women to have chlamydia and over 7 times more likely to contract syphilis.

How is a statistic on the contracting of sexual diseases a reflection of access to medical care? Medical care doesn't prevent the spread of STDs, condoms do. Perhaps we have a crisis about access to condoms?

The unplanned pregnancy rate among Latinas is twice the national average

How is a statistic on unplanned pregnance a reflection on medical care? Contraception prevents pregnancies, not medical care.

Latinas are much more likely to contract human papillomavirus, the infection that leads to cervical cancer.

HPV is a sexually transmitted disease. See above.

it rejected the government's argument that the poor health outcomes arose from behavioral choices rather than government policy choices that fail to address American citizens' human right to adequate reproductive health care.

As much as I hate to defend our government's policies, they have a good point there. Do you know of ANYONE older than 10, who doesn't know that sex results in pregnancies, and what the available methods of contraception are? I don't. Are you telling me the black community has never heard of condoms unless they are taught about em in school? Because I think it is arrogant of you to suggest that the lack of use of condoms/contraception is due to "ignorant blacks/latinas/native americans who don't know any better". People make bad decisions, even when they have all of the available information to make the correct one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You just made my point Posted by: rickiey
» RE: You just made my point Posted by: gingersnap674

Comments are closed-

Why only women
Posted by: Andrew_S on Mar 11, 2008 10:28 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The system fails us one and ALL, while of course the author of this document appears to have no bias or specific gender agenda. So does the system fail ONLY women, I think not, raw medical demographics unmassaged by our intrepid real reports such as this one would tell a different story. You go girl, and do what you do best.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why only women Posted by: no1kstate
» RE: Why only women Posted by: Andrew_S
» RE: Why only women Posted by: no1kstate
» RE: Why only women Posted by: Andrew_S

Comments are closed-

hello...um...its failing us ALL...
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Mar 12, 2008 11:31 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
don't make it about race and/or gender!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Race or economic status
Posted by: Dianka on Mar 23, 2008 12:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's very troubling that our progressive media fails to grasp that the issue is economic status/class, not race. This isn't the 1960's, and I can assure you that neither government nor our corporations hesitate for a second to exploit/punish/dump poor people of any color, including white. Arguably, the most exploitable are rural whites, who are the people the mainstream media doesn't see, the poorest, who are more likely to endure abuses by the legal system, employers, social services, etc. They have the fewest options, and for the most part, they simply have no way out.

That's just the way things are. My point here is that the old race debate, while probably still relevant in the world of corporate careers, is not the cause of today's Great Divide. It is class, the dumping of the poor, the moving of our collective wealth from "common good" policies and programs into the bank accounts of the wealthiest few. Of course those in power hope to keep "the masses" as divided as possible, and race is an easily-identified difference between people. But it would be to our great advantage to get past this point, and start taking a very hard look at what is, indeed, class economic warfare.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

"No one knows anything unless they school teaches em, except me of course"=Elitist snob
Posted by: rickiey on Mar 11, 2008 7:04 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
American-Indian/Alaskan Native women are over 5 times more likely than white women to have chlamydia and over 7 times more likely to contract syphilis.

How is a statistic on the contracting of sexual diseases a reflection of access to medical care? Medical care doesn't prevent the spread of STDs, condoms do. Perhaps we have a crisis about access to condoms?

The unplanned pregnancy rate among Latinas is twice the national average

How is a statistic on unplanned pregnance a reflection on medical care? Contraception prevents pregnancies, not medical care.

Latinas are much more likely to contract human papillomavirus, the infection that leads to cervical cancer.

HPV is a sexually transmitted disease. See above.

it rejected the government's argument that the poor health outcomes arose from behavioral choices rather than government policy choices that fail to address American citizens' human right to adequate reproductive health care.

As much as I hate to defend our government's policies, they have a good point there. Do you know of ANYONE older than 10, who doesn't know that sex results in pregnancies, and what the available methods of contraception are? I don't. Are you telling me the black community has never heard of condoms unless they are taught about em in school? Because I think it is arrogant of you to suggest that the lack of use of condoms/contraception is due to "ignorant blacks/latinas/native americans who don't know any better". People make bad decisions, even when they have all of the available information to make the correct one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You just made my point Posted by: rickiey
» RE: You just made my point Posted by: gingersnap674

Comments are closed-

Why only women
Posted by: Andrew_S on Mar 11, 2008 10:28 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The system fails us one and ALL, while of course the author of this document appears to have no bias or specific gender agenda. So does the system fail ONLY women, I think not, raw medical demographics unmassaged by our intrepid real reports such as this one would tell a different story. You go girl, and do what you do best.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why only women Posted by: no1kstate
» RE: Why only women Posted by: Andrew_S
» RE: Why only women Posted by: no1kstate
» RE: Why only women Posted by: Andrew_S

Comments are closed-

hello...um...its failing us ALL...
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Mar 12, 2008 11:31 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
don't make it about race and/or gender!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Race or economic status
Posted by: Dianka on Mar 23, 2008 12:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's very troubling that our progressive media fails to grasp that the issue is economic status/class, not race. This isn't the 1960's, and I can assure you that neither government nor our corporations hesitate for a second to exploit/punish/dump poor people of any color, including white. Arguably, the most exploitable are rural whites, who are the people the mainstream media doesn't see, the poorest, who are more likely to endure abuses by the legal system, employers, social services, etc. They have the fewest options, and for the most part, they simply have no way out.

That's just the way things are. My point here is that the old race debate, while probably still relevant in the world of corporate careers, is not the cause of today's Great Divide. It is class, the dumping of the poor, the moving of our collective wealth from "common good" policies and programs into the bank accounts of the wealthiest few. Of course those in power hope to keep "the masses" as divided as possible, and race is an easily-identified difference between people. But it would be to our great advantage to get past this point, and start taking a very hard look at what is, indeed, class economic warfare.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS