Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Reproductive Justice and Gender

Men Can Prevent Unintended Pregnancy, Too

By Brian Nguyen, RH Reality Check. Posted February 18, 2008.


Men are deeply affected by pregnancy-related decisions, and should advocate for wider reproductive freedoms.
prochoicewideweb430x2811
Advertisement

Finding himself faced with his partner's unplanned pregnancy, today's man may well be confronted for the first time with a situation in which his opinions and beliefs carry less weight than those of his female partner. In absence of a critical day-to-day assessment of their gender-based privilege and power, privileged men rarely find themselves pushed to recognize the negative effects of their power on the lives of others. So when men create an anti-abortion movement that turns a woman's decision to have an abortion into a story of male victimization and loss of fatherhood, their reaction is understandable -- and even predictable.

But the men who claim that they have been victimized by abortion were not powerless to prevent their circumstances. When a couple uses contraception, they make an implicit agreement that they are not ready to be pregnant. For a man to not be ready to face these decisions, have unprotected sex, and then be upset with his partner for having obtained an abortion and deprived him of his reproductive rights is totally contradictory.

These arguments should in no way delegitimize the suffering that men may feel. Abortion can be a difficult experience, but it is one that women should always have the choice to make. No, men cannot have the final say on their partners' decisions. But they can assert their ability to be knowledgeable and supportive both before and after an abortion. Men can spread a positive message of partnership in decision-making. Masculinity does not have to entail a man making the final decisions in a relationship and giving up his personal aspirations to care for his child. Instead, being strong can mean that a man is willing to discuss family planning with his partner so that when pregnancy occurs, it will be intended, and he will be ready to support the family that he helped to create.

Reproductive responsibility has long been considered to be a woman's task -- but men are deeply affected by the pregnancy-related decisions women make. Abortion decisions have been considered anecdotally to affect the social, emotional, and physical health of men, especially when men are not considered valuable enough to even hear about the decision making process. As seen from November's "Reclaiming Fatherhood" conference in San Francisco, California, which gathered more than a hundred grief-stricken men who had been directly or indirectly involved in abortions, men do want to play a larger part in reproductive decision making -- even if they intend to allow only one option to women and therefore no decision at all. We can sympathize for men who have not had the opportunity to show a more compassionate and supportive side such that their partners would have more likely noticed their potential to both be helpful husbands and unfailing fathers, but we cannot overlook the fact that these sensitivities among men are late in coming. The majority of men seem to want to become part of pregnancy decisions only after having had unprotected sex, and without ever having previously considered their partners' desires to be pregnant with their genetic offspring -- or to be pregnant at all.

Male Involvement in Birth Control and Family Planning

Can men be blamed for sitting back and letting women take the lead in handling birth control? Biology has never forced men to bear the consequences of pregnancy. Nor has our society also asked men to shoulder this burden. The 2005 Debt Reductions Act reduced federal funding for state-run child support enforcement agencies -- so men have been with even fewer reasons to be sexually and socially responsible. Meanwhile, the Child Support Protection Act of 2007 has stalled. But even the paternalistic US government is not solely to blame for men playing too small a part in the prevention of unplanned pregnancy. Medical research has been slow to provide contraceptive options for men and because many men assume that women have already secured a birth control method of their own, they have not demanded them for themselves. Current options that men have to prevent pregnancy are limited to condoms, periodic abstinence, withdrawal, and vasectomy -- and these options are woefully inadequate, when compared to options available to women. Yet even if there existed a better birth control option for men, the difficulties public health organizations have had convincing men to use condoms belie a more desperate situation, in which, for many men, possible consequences of sexual activity are considered only after sex takes place.

But men can do better and women should expect this of them. One simple and very concrete way men can take more responsibility for reproductive health and family planning has been made possible by the FDA approval of over-the-counter provision of emergency contraception.

Male Access to Emergency Contraception

If ever there was a perfect time for men to band together against a loss of fatherhood, that time is now -- with their demand for access to emergency contraception. Those who feel that they have been hurt by abortion have more reason than anyone else to spread knowledge of Plan B and support its widespread provision to men.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: reproductive justice, birth control, gender, men, contraception

Brian Nguyen is currently a medical student in his second year at the Warren Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University, as well as a coordinator of the university's chapter of the Medical Students for Choice, a group dedicated to resolving the nation's shortage of abortion providers through the destigmatization and inclusion of abortion in medical school education.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Reproductive Justice and Gender! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What do I think of western civilization? Ghandi: I think it would be a good idea
Posted by: gendershaman on Feb 18, 2008 12:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This conversation takes place within an almost total historical vacuum of male responsibility-taking. This is the legacy of previous generations of males to us today. They fought (and died for, cue patriotic music) their (and our) right as males to not have to take responsibility for our "contribution" to making babies, and not spreading STI's, being good fathers, etc. Have you ever heard the phrase "She got herself pregnant?" Ever wonder about the pseudo-biology there? Every one of our mothers, grandmothers, etc. lived within that hypocritical, male-defined system. Females were held to be completely responsible for keeping themselves from becoming impregnated. The same was true of rape-females were blamed if they "failed to set a male's limits." This inequity has not changed appreciably. And almost all of the activism was (eek!) feminists.
The responsibility of males to use condoms, accept his responsibility if there was a birth control "failure," to be sure before intercourse that he and she had similar beliefs about abortion or raising the child together or apart in the case of pregnancy was never taught to boys. The concepts of purity, chastity, virginity were used to control and judge only females. Males then and now laugh at the idea of applying these equally to males. Instead of the usual Alternet defensive male response, how about we males heal our rage and hurt and disappointments and not continue the male war on females of which forced pregnancies are one example. How different from right-wing are we?
Thank you, Joe Weinberg

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Great observations Posted by: LeeAnnG
this makes sense
Posted by: luzmejor on Feb 18, 2008 12:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having both partners taking responsibility is a sensible solution to one of the most important issues facing married couples. That is, how to control their family's size.

Unfortunately, the medical student has not addressed the squeamishness of the general public about anything sexual. Most people are even less forthcoming about revealing their money problems to each other. There are a lot of very complex reasons why people don't talk about birth control, aside from the main fact that it is a religious taboo.

Most of the men in the "injured by abortion" groups are more interested in keeping their partner in a subservient position in their marriages and nothing can do that so easily as making sure she is tied down to a houseful of children, the younger and needier, the better. This is so well-known it is cliche.

I know of men who have impregnated more than one woman and who claim every one of the children (some have as many as 10 children by different women) as tax deductions, even while their several families are being supported by public funds. In fact, some polygamists may be using this method to make their own living.

The greatest satisfaction comes to some men who can force their discarded and pregnant wife to bear another child she could possibly be compelled to turn over to him and his new paramour to raise on government checks too.

All of that is just to show her who is "boss."

It could be fairly said that marriage is the last vestige of ancient agricultural economies (as in the Bible) that were supported mostly by reproduction as well as production.

Without government subsidies like tax rebates, even family farmers are losing their land to developers and agribusinesses, so it is safe to say that large families are unsustainable now.

It's way past time to stop pining for that long-lost way of supporting a large family. I believe that we are in the middle of a cultural change that will have people demanding sterilization while they are still in their prime child-bearing years. It is time we faced the decision whether to have children (or not) earlier in our lives and took control of our own fertility right from the beginning.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You are twisting logic
Posted by: rickiey on Feb 18, 2008 7:08 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is very simple. Both men and women, have pre-conception choices that can preven them from being responsible for a child they do not wish to have. That is a good thing. That is equality.

Women have a post-conception choice to prevent them from being responsible for a child they do not wish to have. I think we all (here anyway) can agree that it is a good thing.

Men do not.

That is NOT equality under the law.

A law saying that men may, ONLY during the pregnancy, "abort" legally absolving them of all responsibility towards the result of the pregnancy.

That is equality under that law.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You are twisting logic Posted by: rickiey