COMMENTS: 5
Students Suspended For Promoting Safer Sex
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Reproductive Justice headlines via email.
"I can't think of another federal program where so much money was spent without any oversight and to such little effect," James Wagoner, president of Advocates for Youth, told Reynolds. "It wasn't that policy-makers didn't know that abstinence-only didn't work. In 2000 the Institute of Medicine issued a scathing report on these programs. But they went full steam ahead despite the warning. It's beyond naïve. It's immoral."
Thanks to recent Nation guest blogger Jessica Valenti for alerting me to the story of two eighth grade students in St. Louis who felt the same way and recently tried to protest this naivete and immorality. Other than a local CNN report, Valenti's website, Feministing.com, was the first -- and still one of the only -- publications or broadcast operations on or off-line to report on Tori Shoemaker and Cheyenne Byrd's brave stand against abstinence-only education.
The two students at Louis & Clark Junior High School protested their school's abstinence-only education program by wearing shirts to school adorned with condoms, reading "Safe Sex or No Sex." For daring to make a statement, they were suspended for two days from school by the regional superindent, who called the shirts "inappropriate" and a "distraction." As Valenti adds: "Yes, because a 'distraction' in the form of free speech is clearly much worse than spreading dangerous misinformation about sex to teens."
The CNN video shows the girls to be smart, thoughtful, engaged citizens--just the sort of students our schools should be proud of producing.
Stay up to date with the latest Reproductive Justice headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: g on Feb 14, 2008 5:42 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: g on Feb 14, 2008 5:43 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Xynyx on Feb 15, 2008 8:40 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know my own Senators are on that list... Allard is a complete pile of shit (and is, thankfully, retiring... though I wish he'd throw himself under a bus right now...), and Salazar is proving himself to be 50% worthless, at best (he's not really a disappointment... because I expected this of him - we definitely had a better choice in the primary). Even my Rep (Mark Udall), who is likely to replace Allard, doesn't get a perfect score... though I can't think of any grave offenses he's committed.
Where are people of principle? Do I have to run for office to feel like there is someone I can trust?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: boundjymind on Feb 21, 2008 6:32 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ama on Mar 12, 2008 9:26 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder what would they do to me 5 years ago, when I was promoting sex toys in a local high school as a good way to start exploring your body without putting at risk your health before you go into the
"real action"?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: g on Feb 14, 2008 5:42 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: g on Feb 14, 2008 5:43 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Xynyx on Feb 15, 2008 8:40 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know my own Senators are on that list... Allard is a complete pile of shit (and is, thankfully, retiring... though I wish he'd throw himself under a bus right now...), and Salazar is proving himself to be 50% worthless, at best (he's not really a disappointment... because I expected this of him - we definitely had a better choice in the primary). Even my Rep (Mark Udall), who is likely to replace Allard, doesn't get a perfect score... though I can't think of any grave offenses he's committed.
Where are people of principle? Do I have to run for office to feel like there is someone I can trust?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: boundjymind on Feb 21, 2008 6:32 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ama on Mar 12, 2008 9:26 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder what would they do to me 5 years ago, when I was promoting sex toys in a local high school as a good way to start exploring your body without putting at risk your health before you go into the
"real action"?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Updated: Catholic Bishops Embrace Anti-Abortion Terrorizers Missy Smith and Randall Terry
10 Defining Feminist Moments of 2009
Going Undercover in the Crazy, Tragic World of Christian Gay-Conversion Therapy




