Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Reproductive Justice and Gender

"Choose Life" Fanatics Should Choose a Different License Plate

By Stephanie Losee, Huffington Post. Posted January 29, 2008.


The courts may have approved "Choose Life" license plates, but that doesn't mean they're a good idea.
chooselifefloridaplates718837
choose life
Advertisement

Yesterday the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held that the state of Arizona was wrong to ban the "Choose Life" specialty license plate, citing free speech. Arizona "clearly denied the application based on the nature of the message," wrote Judge Richard Tallman in the 3-0 ruling. You won't get an argument from me on that one, Your Honor. But what makes you think that's the point?

Perhaps some of you readers don't know anything about this ruckus. You might live in some lovely civilized place -- say, California, where both I and the 9th Circuit live -- in which case you've probably never seen one of these plates. Permit me to enlighten you. They're yellow. They have a cute child's drawing of a boy and a girl on them. And they say "Choose Life" in a child's scrawl. Then there are your license plate numbers. As if the state endorses all of this.

These plates are ubiquitous in states like Florida, which approved them all the way back in 2000. Their owners pay a $22 annual fee that goes to support organizations that encourage girls with unwanted pregnancies to give up their babies for adoption. If an organization even mentions the word "abortion," it's disqualified from receiving any proceeds from the plate. In case you were wondering, there's no "Choose Choice" license plate on the list of Florida's offerings.

We have specialty plates here in California. I own one myself. It says, "Yosemite National Park," and my annual fee goes to the Yosemite Foundation. I had other options, too. Real controversial stuff. There's Lake Tahoe Conservancy. Also, California Coastal Commission (aka Save the Whales). And Firefighters. And the Child Health and Safety Fund, which goes toward child injury prevention. In other words, every California specialty plate offers a message you can be sure that California, as a state, sanctions on some level. You can tell by its offerings that California wants to preserve the health of its whales, its lakes, its mountains, its firefighters, and its kids. What California doesn't do is provide a state-sponsored platform for a moral argument.

When Arizona rejected the Choose Life group's application, it said the state was concerned that people would come to the conclusion that Arizona had endorsed the plate's anti-abortion message. And since the plate is a means to funnel funds to a special-interest group, Arizona can hardly be blamed for wanting to avoid the appearance it had chosen sides in such a divisive debate.

So I hardly think the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court is focusing on the key issue when it used free speech to overturn a lower court's decision to allow Arizona to regulate the messages that appear on its license plates. Now what? Arizona can't ban a group that wants a license plate that says "Preserve Traditional Marriage"? That message qualifies as free speech too, though I doubt that when that message is embossed onto Arizona plates you'll also find its counterpoint: "Marriage is For Everyone." If this is where the courts are going, I am more than pleased to lose my ability to own a license plate that supports Yosemite. I'll write the damn check myself.

I have a suggestion for Choose Life -- which, by the way, is a 42-state organization that is pursuing law suits across the nation. Choose this: Bumper stickers.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: abortion, law, reproductive justice

Stephanie Losee is co-author of the book Office Mate: The Employee Handbook for Finding--and Managing--Romance on the Job. In the book she and co-author Helaine Olen explain how office romance can be good for you. Stephanie is also co-author of You've Only Got Three Seconds: How to Make the Right Impression in Your Business and Social Life. Her personal essays have appeared in several publications and in anthologies that include Cup of Comfort for Writers, The Maternal is Political, and Horse Crazy. Her work has been published in O, The Oprah Magazine; Fortune; the San Francisco Chronicle Magazine; The Los Angeles Times; The New York Post; and Salon.com, among others. She is a frequent commentator on KQED, Northern California Public Radio. Stephanie's non-blog, a series of short essays called "Ceci N'est Pas Un Blog," appears on her Web site: www.stephanielosee.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Reproductive Justice and Gender! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
so perniciously pervasive and insidious
Posted by: Ames on Jan 29, 2008 8:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it's just anoter ridiculous little victory for the anti-abortion groups that fight these little fights until they add up to a whole heap of ever-present messages the they hope will reinforce their anti-abortion message. the state was right to ensure it was not seen to be supporting or endorsing one side/group. imagine the furore if indeed there were number plates with 'choose choice' or similar.

oh for the days when 'choose life' was a reference to trainspotting, rather than some insidious message to judge and condemn women who have had/want to have/will have abortions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

interesting choice of words
Posted by: Ames on Jan 29, 2008 9:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
interesting that the phrase is 'choose life', indicating that they recognise that there is a choice here (ie, that other choices/options are available). though i rather suppose that the recognition is grudging and they would rather there was no choice at all (perhaps then their plates would be 'forced life'???).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

wild gunmen
Posted by: wittler youth on Jan 31, 2008 6:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why not a plate that reads; KILL YERSELF OR DIE..thats a choice.i agree with az....screw those right to lifers..back water cretins,plates were for auto i.d. now they want to put politics on them for $$$..shesh!.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]