Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Reproductive Justice and Gender

Private RU-486 Confounds Anti-Abortionists: Who Can We Harass Now?

By Sara Robinson, Group News Blog. Posted February 14, 2008.


If women no longer need clinics to obtain abortions, what will anti-choice terrorists bomb?
yf2
Advertisement

Don't look now, but the front lines of the abortion battle are shifting. Thanks to advances in medical technology and the introduction of the drug mifepristone (aka RU 486), which gives women the option of having safe, early abortions in private locations instead of public clinics, the raving crazies who tape pictures of bloody fetuses to their bodies, stalk Planned Parenthood and howl "murder" at anyone who walks through its doors, may suddenly find themselves all dressed up with nowhere to go -- and no one to terrorize.

Or, at the very least, if this mob of screeching would-be fetus rescuers wants to continue its brand of guerrilla warfare -- a decades-long face-down with abortion providers who have accepted the possibility that they'd be blown up at their desks or taken out by a sniper while sitting at their dinner tables as just another part of the job -- its self-righteous, lunatic members will have to work a lot harder.

It's about time. Because, judging from the religious right's30-year campaign of violence against U.S. and Canadian medical clinics, I'd say murder in the name of God hasn't been too difficult. Here's a look at domestic terrorism by the numbers:

  • 7 murders, including 3 doctors, 2 clinic employees, a security guard, and an escort
  • 17 attempted murders
  • 383 death threats
  • 153 incidents of assault and battery
  • 3 kidnappings
  • 41 bombings
  • 173 arsons
  • 91 attempted bombings or arsons
  • 619 bomb threats
  • 655 bioterror attacks (all hoaxes), 554 of which were committed by one man
  • 1,630 incidents of trespassing
  • 1,264 incidents of vandalism
  • 100 attacks with butyric acid stink bombs

One-third of all abortion clinics in 1981 were gone by 2005.

If Islamic Jihadists had done even a tenth this much damage, every last Muslim in America would be doing stress-position calisthenics in a concentration camp somewhere in the Nevada desert right now. But since this impressive achievement in domestic terrorism was almost entirely accomplished by white Christian men -- well, y'see, it's Not Terrorism when we do it -- the public has barely batted an eye.

In fact, while most of the country was looking the other way, that's when the supply lines for abortion shifted. According to a recent article in the Washington Post, that change -- RU-486 -- is starting to make a fundamental difference in the way abortion happens -- and is talked about -- in this country.

According to the Post's Rob Stein:

At a time when the overall number of abortions has been steadily declining, a new survey reported that RU-486-induced abortions have been rising by 22 percent a year and now account for 14 percent of the total -- and more than 1 in 5 of early abortions performed by the ninth week of pregnancy.

It's not the actual numbers that are interesting here; it's the trendline. RU-486 has been available in the United States since 2000, and its use has been increasing at a slow but steady rate ever since. What's new is that it's finally approaching critical mass, gaining acceptance with the vast numbers of doctors who've wanted to offer their patients the option of a safe early abortion, but simply couldn't take on the daunting social, financial or physical risks of performing the operation themselves. Increasingly, year by year, RU-486 has allowed more and more of these doctors and their patients to do a complete end-run around the crazies at the clinic door. And this has gone on long enough now that it's starting to change the way we approach the whole issue, on several fronts.

First, it's already putting more abortion providers back in service. For 20 years, the number of doctors and clinics offering abortion was in free fall: Every year, it seemed, more of them succumbed to anti-choice harassment and pressure, and closed their doors. Old doctors retired; young ones were discouraged from learning the procedure; clinic directors balked at the PR and security problems and the insurance premiums. But, according to the Guttmacher Institute, the rate of decline suddenly flattened from 8 percent to 2 percent in 2001, as doctors started adding RU-486 to their practices -- and that rate has held steady ever since. We're still losing abortion providers, but most of those losses are being offset by the growing number of doctors offering drug-induced medical abortion. Even better news: Those doctors are now everywhere, including states where the last surgical abortion provider was run out years ago.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: reproductive justice, abortion, terrorism, pro-life, ru-486

Sara Robinson is a 20-year veteran of Silicon Valley and is launching a second career as a strategic foresight analyst. When she's not studying change theories and reactionary movements, you can find her singing the alto part over at Orcinus. She lives in Vancouver, B.C., with her husband and two teenagers.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Reproductive Justice and Gender! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It is about time, but damned if we do and....
Posted by: Turiye on Feb 14, 2008 2:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You know the rest. How in hell with HIPPA in place can these out of work old men, and pray the rosary nasty ladies?, get our medical records?
I will seek them out like a pitbull if they come near mine.
These young women have no idea what we've endured. What will those horrid Seniors do now? Maybe a real live child that needs love, support and healthcare. 'YA THINK?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» And The Answer Is... Posted by: bobtr900
It is about time, but damned if we do and....
Posted by: Turiye on Feb 14, 2008 2:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You know the rest. How in hell with HIPPA in place can these out of work old men, and pray the rosary nasty ladies?, get our medical records?
I will seek them out like a pitbull if they come near mine.
These young women have no idea what we've endured. What will those horrid Seniors do now? Maybe a real live child that needs love, support and healthcare. 'YA THINK?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hypocrites, full speed ahead!
Posted by: d.nweindeb on Feb 14, 2008 2:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the peculiarities of such groups as Operation Rescue/Operation Save America is their incredible hypocrisy, which is really very obvious and yet rarely receives any serious reaction. And that is that these moral vigilantes, so obsessed with the issues of life and family values according to their definitions, are in a sense pro-death in light of the narrowness of their focus on the fetus and even the immediate chemical result of a sperm and an ovum getting together. The sites of their demonstrations, do they ever include military bases or locations where, for example, military jets, nuclear subs, and bombs are made, or demonstrate against an obese military budget, dedicated to death and profit? Do they ever march against an unjust war, like the one in Iraq where directly or indirectly our actions have caused as many as 1,000,000 people to perish? Do they ever clamor for such as even the recent pitiful increase in the minimum wage? I mean, aren’t families supposed to eat and shelter their kids, and so on? Do they maybe once in a while protest attacks on such government entitlements as help provide aid to the indigent, including indigent children and families? Then what about those tax cuts for the wealthy and CEO salaries and perks that ultimately and negatively impact on the well-being of those thousand of marginal families who do not share in the largess of our society? Do they ever oppose unregulated capitalism and the suffering it causes to those on the edge, families included? Since Kansas seems to be the most important national venue for these groups, one might assume that their members are largely anti-Darwin. I wonder, though, if, as good American patriots, true to a kind of John Wayne modus vivendi, they are actually advocates and practitioners of social Darwinism, no doubt made acceptable through commendable acts of charity? What a shame that these people have succeeded, cleverly so, in co-opting the term, and by extension, the concept, “pro-life”. What they are pro is the sick satisfaction of gang-like participation in a specialized religious fanaticism that satisfies their emotional needs. By their hypocrisy shall you know and judge them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hypocrites, full speed ahead! Posted by: d.nweindeb
» RE: Hypocrites, full speed ahead! Posted by: plantsareneat
» RE: Hypocrites, full speed ahead! Posted by: d.nweindeb
if you are against abortion, don't have one
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Feb 14, 2008 4:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if that's the way you feel, make it one of your family gods but keep your 'morality' to yerself!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The pro-lifers have lost this one.
Posted by: colinmeister on Feb 14, 2008 5:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whatever the pro-lifers do, they cannot stop the use of RU-486. If medical records are made public, use of the drug will just go underground. Another AlterNet piece today talks of the easy availablity of Oxycodone as a street drug - RU-486 will be distributed that way too, if there is a demand for it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who's Next?
Posted by: jmmartin on Feb 14, 2008 5:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You ask: "If women no longer need clinics to obtain abortions, what will anti-choice terrorists bomb?"

A: Drug stores that carry it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who's Next? Posted by: TheNamelessCity
» RE: Who's Next? Posted by: willymack
» RE: insiders Posted by: Dboy
» RE: insiders Posted by: IntlDad
» RE: Who's Next? Posted by: Xynyx
» RE: the problem Posted by: walldodger1969
» RE: Who's Next? Drug stores that carry it? Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
Kudos to Sara Robinson
Posted by: AnIndependentThinker on Feb 14, 2008 5:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sara Robinson does a good job drawing a deep contrast between Islamic terrorists and "home-grown" terrorists; and the displaced emphasis on which "patriots" are transfixed. The radicalism that has perverted an entire country based on race and culture has defaced the morals and ethics of what the human race should hold true.

While I personally do not agree with abortion, it is not my right as an individual to make that choice for someone else. Nor is it the right of a radical terrorist to make that decision either. If anti-abortion bombers think that God loves them for killing more people for the life of a fetus, then they are obviously not working in the name of God.

And I agree, had these anti-abortion bombers and murderers been of Muslim origins, I am certain that this nation would be up in arms and ready to go after the "evil-doers."

Great article. Great topic. Sheer truth.

Thanks for sharing this piece.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

don't bogart that RU-486
Posted by: solrev on Feb 14, 2008 5:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While there are some terrorist in the anti abortion movement, the majority of the social conservatives are still pushing for making abortions illegal. Illegal abortions mean illegal drugs, so we are going to need some more prisons for the war on abortion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: don't bogart that RU-486 Posted by: ALANHESTER
Fabulous!
Posted by: paula.c on Feb 14, 2008 5:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just hope that women in all parts of our great country have the opportunity to obtain this medication if and when they want it. And why isn't safe, sane, inexpenssive birth control encouraged more? Those "right to life" nuts sound more like the Taliban, come to think of it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

People Outraged by Invasion of Privacy?
Posted by: constitution, what constitution on Feb 14, 2008 6:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I found this article very interesting, but I just have one question for you. Do you really think people will get so up in arms about invasion of privacy? I mean it's been happening at an accelerated rate for the past 7 years. Not to mention the whole Kansas debacle made headlines for about a day.

Maybe the anti-choicers will realize what they need to do is spend some of that energy educating people so abortion rates drop. Man, that's crazy talk!

The only negative here is that I'm going to eventually lose a group of people to mock when I walk by my local clinic. You should see the expressions on their faces when they're kneeling in front of the clinic praying and crying and you walk by and laugh at them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

New tactic
Posted by: JSquercia on Feb 14, 2008 6:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe the new tactic will be the use of so called Concience Laws whereby a Pharamcist may refuse to dispense a perscription if it violates his concience .I would assume this could also apply to a Pharamcy as well as individual Pharacists .
I do not believe that these laws should be upheld . That is the profession they chose and so long as the perscription is legal there should be NO right to refuse to fill it . The impact would of be far greater in smaller communities which would have fewer Pharmacys . In cities and suburbs there are usually multiple Pharamcy's . We will soon have 3 in
four block area where I live in Nassau County NY .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: New tactic Posted by: Intellect
» RE: New tactic Posted by: praedor
» Imagine... Posted by: zipper696
enlightened
Posted by: Johnboy on Feb 14, 2008 6:58 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although I am personally opposed to bombing abortion clinics, I do not want to impose my views on others. In fact, aren't the bombers exercising their choice?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I think you are misleading yourselves
Posted by: praedor on Feb 14, 2008 7:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you think RU-486 solves the problem of Christianist terrorists bombing or assassinating doctors and nurses. A "private" abortion is great but...it is not that difficult for the fundie terrorists to find out who is giving out RU-486 and simply target them. All one has to do is visit different docs and say "I'm pregnant and don't want to be, what can you do?" Any that prescribe RU-486 could then be made known to the terrorists and the bombings and shootings continue. Another way to identify the doctors and nurses involved is for a compromised/corrupt/terrorist pharmacist to simply let the anti-choice terrorists know what doctors wrote a prescription for RU-486.

The situation is a little better with NON-RU-486 drugs. Virtually ANY anti-cancer chemotherapeutic drug can be used to terminate a pregnancy. You cannot prevent terrorist agents from going to various doctors and saying they're preggers and want to end it to identify those that will prescribe drugs to terminate pregnancies, but it WOULD render impotent the pharmacists that would act as "moral gatekeepers" and otherwise deny women their birth control or abortion drugs: they cannot deny a woman her chemotherapeutic and there is no way for the pharmacist to know whether a woman with a prescription for methotrexate is pregnant or actually has cancer needing treatment.

RU-486 helps but it is hardly an answer. It would help a great deal if the drug had more widespread AND KNOWN use beyond simply terminating pregnancy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Nazis
Posted by: bitsfick on Feb 14, 2008 7:14 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
good Christians all, were anti-abortion as was Joesph Stalin, along with most so-called godless communists. Stalin by the way contrary to popular opinion was not an athiest. He abolished the church simply because he shared power with no one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Nazis Posted by: Capybara
Privacy There is no Stinkin Privacy
Posted by: JSquercia on Feb 14, 2008 7:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The latest vote on the Spying Bill in the Congress has DOOMED any Right to Privacy . Nothing you do or say is protected anymore thanks to the Defilers of the Constitution that make up this Administration .
I realise it somewhat off topic but the very idea of Privacy means NOTHING to These people
EXCEPT of course THEIR privacy which is protected by Executive Privelege and Deleted
E mails .
Scary thought is once Medical Records are no longer Private it will only be a matter of time before Insurance Companies gain access to them and use them to restrict Medical Coverage .
Imagine what they could do with DNA . If your DNA shows a genetic disposition towards some
disease NO insurance for YOU .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE:No insurance for you! Posted by: Sushi
RU-486 still requires clinic visits
Posted by: gottabeme on Feb 14, 2008 7:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Feministing.com covered this article on 1/29/08, and pointed out what I found to be true when I investigated clinics in my area that provided medical abortions - the woman still has to make clinic visits. It's not as if the clinic just calls the prescription in to the pharmacy and the whole thing happens in the privacy of the woman's home. Medical abortion usualy requires the same number of trips to the clinic as surgical abortion, so women can still be harassed by protestors outside of clinics.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A human life begins.... When?
Posted by: scott balogh on Feb 14, 2008 7:21 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please be sincere when answering that question. I have felt that a human life begins development at conception and ceases development at death. If true, how can abortion be acceptable prior to birth but not after birth?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A human life begins.... When? Posted by: plantsareneat
» RE: A human life begins.... When? Posted by: RosieRivetor
» RE: OK,OK!! Posted by: scott balogh
Through the looking glass...
Posted by: pikaomega on Feb 14, 2008 7:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If I may, I would like to offer my personal experience regarding birth control to illustrate the strangeness that seems to define this debate.

I grew up with an extremely abusive father, leading of course to all kinds of "Daddy issues" that have haunted me in my own relationships; I am BiPolar I, which has led to several psychiatric hospitalizations and requires massive amounts of medication every day to simply keep me alive; I was in a auto accident at the age of 20 which mangled me internally, claiming organs and rendering my liver, kidneys and pancreas sub-functional. But, most importantly, I have never wanted children. I have no maternal drive, and not once have I thought to myself "I want a baby." In light of all of this, I decided at a young age (I am now 28) that I wanted a tubal ligation. I am blessed to have a family that stood behind my decision, and though they mourned the loss of what I would never have, they understood that this was the route that I needed to take. My mother is a nurse, my biggest champion and my fiercest critic. We repeatedly assessed the situation, and both came to the conclusion that a.) I would most likely not be able to physically handle a pregnancy, b.) I could not put a child through seeing their mother in a psychotic state, and c.) The responsible choice was to opt to prevent a situation (though amazingly effective, no birth control is 100% and mistakes happen) that would result in an abortion.

I was told that I would have to wait until I turned 25 before any doctor would even discuss the proceedure with me. So, in 2005, I began the daunting task of finding an OBGYN that I could meet with. I am not insured, but had the cash in hand for the operation. I began contacting offices, and I was astounded by what I found.

I was told, ad nauseum, that despite all of the logical, pragmatic reasons for me to undergo this surgery, I was simply confused and that no doctor would talk to me...I didn't know what I wanted. I would change my mind. Come now, don't you want to be a mommy? Sure you do. We can give you birth control. IUD. Depo. The pill. I was hung up on, laughed at, lectured and scorned.

After four and one half months, I finally found a doctor willing to see me. The surgery was a breeze, and three years later, I still regard it to be the best decision that I have ever made.

My point is this: Why is it that I could elect to have an abortion as a teenager, but as an adult with serious mental, emotional and physical afflictions I was deemed unfit to make the decision that the best course of action for me was to take abortion and pregnancy off of the table all together? I am, ABSOLUTELY, in favor of practicality when dealing with birth control and abortion. I was fortunate to have a mother that was totally open and honest when these topics arose, and that gave me the infomation necessary to take responsible measures to prevent negative consequences. I am simply saying that we seem to put the cart before the horse here. Abortion should be available, safe and infrequent. But playing politics with the health of millions of women is what breeds the shame and misinformation that result in unwanted pregnancies.

I would say to all of you that have young daughters, my mother's openness and honesty set in me a deep trust for which I am forever thankful. I was never made to feel ashamed, and was rightfully taught that sexuality is at the foundation of human nature. Because of this, I never hesitated to ask her about birth control and abortion, and had faith that the advice I was given was honest and in my best interest. This discussion is what prevents disasterous situations. We know that moralizing doctors and pharmacists exists, and you can never be sure that the advice you're given is medical or moral. Be your daughter's first line of defense, they will be forever grateful.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hmmm....
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Feb 14, 2008 8:13 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
# 7 murders, including 3 doctors, 2 clinic employees, a security guard, and an escort

# 17 attempted murders

# 383 death threats

# 153 incidents of assault and battery

# 3 kidnappings

# 41 bombings

# 173 arsons

# 91 attempted bombings or arsons

# 619 bomb threats

# 655 bioterror attacks (all hoaxes), 554 of which were committed by one man


I wonder how these stats over the past 30 years would compare with number of violent crimes committed in the name of scoring a fix (a different drug from ru-486, mind you) in the previous year alone.

These stats do confirm that in a nation of 300M, we have some very whacked individuals, to the point that an average citizen on an average day "enjoyed" the chance to encounter an anti-choice oriented whackjob that would kill them on the order of 7/30*365*300000 = 2.13x10-9 (a tad off, as I just used the latest census for the population).

Nevertheless, this tells us the dire grip that anti-abortion advocates grip our country: you're only 100,000 or so times more likely to die in an airplane crash than as a result of abortion on a baptist pulpit. Or somewhat thereabouts...

Oh those deadly christians. As soon as we get done banning planes, pools, and cars, I'm going to wholeheartedly throw my support behind the prAggressive war on what 99.99...% (tired of writing 9's) amounts to superstitious silliness in a country that is supposed to respect your right to superstitious silliness. Don't worry fellow zealots: we can take down the wiccans next.

Ahh...however: This newfound grasp of the obvious represents progress, and is noteworthy.

It may even lead to addressing some genuine, massive problems down the road, what with Clinton's anti-choice "mandates", perpetual wars supported by both popular demobots and republicrats, running the country on a $600B deficit this year and what looks like in perpetuity, abandoning our Constitutional guarantees of freedom and liberty...

...sigh. The obvious is a good place to start, I suppose. Shall we move quickly now? We have some far deadlier pools to fill before we tackle teh dred xchun.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hmmm....????? Posted by: maribelle
These liars don't care about the babies...
Posted by: TheNamelessCity on Feb 14, 2008 9:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They are simply pissed off that women can have power over their own bodies and have sex outside of religious wacko norms. The true goal of the pro-lifers is to impose old-fashioned patriarchy, the way things used to be when, in their enfeebled, unenlightened minds, the bible was imposed on kids in public schools and christianity was the privileged mythology. Deep down, this loss of privileged patriarchy, with the white male WASPs on top running everyone's life, is what riles them. Guaranteed they don't care as much about the little black fetuses and they do about the white ones...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: white males Posted by: Dboy
» Right, D-Boy, in a way Posted by: Aimleft
HIPPA
Posted by: Dboy on Feb 14, 2008 9:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Readers are probably wondering about the HIPPA link to all of this, as I was. There's a section in HIPPA called "Public Interest and Benefit Activities". This is a list of various reasons where those who "protect" healthcare data may have to surrender it. You can see from the list that there are MANY easy ways to get around HIPPA rules. Really, after reading this I wonder what the real point of HIPPA even is. I would post the link to this but the link length was too long for Alternet:


Sec 5: Public Interest and Benefit Activities. The Privacy Rule permits use and
disclosure of protected health information, without an individual’s authorization or
permission, for 12 national priority purposes.



Covered entities may disclose protected health
information to:

(1) public health authorities authorized by law to collect or
receive such information for preventing or controlling disease, injury, or
disability and to public health or other government authorities authorized to
receive reports of child abuse and neglect;

(2) entities subject to FDA
regulation regarding FDA regulated products or activities for purposes such
as adverse event reporting, tracking of products, product recalls, and post-
marketing surveillance;

(3) individuals who may have contracted or been
exposed to a communicable disease when notification is authorized by law;
and

(4) employers, regarding employees, when requested by employers, for
information concerning a work-related illness or injury or workplace related
medical surveillance, because such information is needed by the employer to
comply with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OHSA),
the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MHSA), or similar state law.

(5)
Victims of Abuse, Neglect or Domestic Violence. In certain circumstances,
covered entities may disclose protected health information to appropriate
government authorities regarding victims of abuse, neglect, or domestic
violence.

(6)
Health Oversight Activities. Covered entities may disclose protected health
information to health oversight agencies (as defined in the Rule) for purposes
of legally authorized health oversight activities, such as audits and
investigations necessary for oversight of the health care system and
government benefit programs.

(7)
Judicial and Administrative Proceedings. Covered entities may disclose
protected health information in a judicial or administrative proceeding if the
request for the information is through an order from a court or administrative
tribunal. Such information may also be disclosed in response to a subpoena
or other lawful process if certain assurances regarding notice to the individual
or a protective order are provided.

(8)
Law Enforcement Purposes. Covered entities may disclose protected health
information to law enforcement officials for law enforcement purposes

(more follows; limited by Alternet post length)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Uphill battle
Posted by: willymack on Feb 14, 2008 9:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is it my imagination, or is nearly every effort aimed at improving the human condition resisted by those with middling minds and a set of delusional beliefs burdening their already limited intellects? It seems they long for a perfect world where we can breed indiscriminately, shackle the minds and liberties of half our population, and indoctrinate our children in the one true religion, (make that SUPERSTITUTION)? Anyone with access to the internet or a public library can peruse the histories of various nations at various times, and, depending on their ability to REASON, come to the conclusion that all this has been tried before, at many times and places, and has FAILED MISERABLY, and often spectacularly, each and every time. Despite the fact of a mountain of factual evidence looking them in the face, they'll go right on with their silly lives, unable to see the faults in their beliefs. They're BELIEVERS, not THINKERS, and as such can be brought into a better world only by the overwhelming force of public opinion, reinforced by KNOWLEGE.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

big pharma
Posted by: cwilsondrum on Feb 14, 2008 10:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when and if this issue ratchets up,and the "pro-lifers"go after big pharma,just after the first bomb goes off they will all be in jail,under the new regimes' terrorist laws,and will not see daylight for maybe never. you will not stop big pharma from making obscene profits,and no laws will be able to stop them,because they(big pharma),are a person, and therefore have all the consittutional rights of a person,and the money to go to court and get their rights. It has already happened all around the world, where there are no longer any local businesses,just big agra,big pharma,big oil,big banks and the list goes on. I know I rambled a little,but the point is,just as soon as the pill gets moving enough for the profit line to increase, all the moral high ground will disintegrate

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

AWESOME
Posted by: meetmeineleusis on Feb 14, 2008 11:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now the right-wing bible thumping rapturist nutjobs and hairy arm pitted doc martens wearing feminazis can BOTH SHUT THE HELL UP!!!

Win/Win, I say.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This article is well-intentioned but contains errors
Posted by: amien on Feb 14, 2008 11:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I appreciate Sara's article immensely but there are many conclusions drawn here and misstatements made that cloud how RU-486 can and can't affect the environment around women's reproductive health.

First off, RU-486 is medication that needs to be preceded and followed up on by a medical provider thus necessitating at least two visits to either a clinic, hospital or doctor's office. It's not as if you just call in to your doctor's office and it's waiting for you at the counter. The provider needs to see you, check to see how far along you are, check to see if there's an ectopic pregnancy, make sure you're health allows for this type of medication, etc.

Secondly, for clarification, RU-486 is only used for women who are 9 weeks pregnant or earlier - which does not even encompass the whole first trimester. After that, it's a surgical abortion.

Third, many women do not like medication abortion (RU-486) because, unlike a surgical abortion, where you go into the clinic or office pregnant and come out not pregnant, a medication abortion is a more drawn out process. It takes 2-3 days, there is a lot of bleeding and cramping. Then you go back to the clinic or office to make sure you're not pregnant - to ensure the abortion was complete. If you are, you need a surgical abortion to complete the process. That doesn't happen often but it does happen.

Fourth, for many women it is not feasible for them to spend 2-3 days cramping & bleeding and waiting to pass the pregnancy. They are in an abusive relationship and don't want their partner to know, they have children at home and can't be layed up for days, they need to go back to work immediately (this is an issue for many women who can barely get the one day off for a surgical abortion, let alone three).

Fifth, Sara says that the number of abortion providers has increased according to the Guttmacher study. It is true that the number of providers offering RU-486 has increased but, from my perspective, simply offering RU-486 as another option in your practice does not offset the critically low number of full-fledged abortion providers/women's health centers in this country. Independent abortion providers are closing their doors at an alarming rate - and many of those are full women's health centers that take a wholistic view of women's health; abortion, contraception, annual exams, family planning, STI treatment and testing. Many were feminist in nature and truly understood what it meant to counsel women prior to a procedure, offer comprehensive, woman centered services. I am not convinced that some doctor's simply adding RU-486 is a long term benefit to women and women's health.

Lastly, Sara brings up women not needing to visit a pharmacist for the medication. I think it's important to be clear that there is no abortion medication one can access via a pharmacy. Women can get emergency contraception or Plan B from a pharmacist but not RU-486.

I appreciate Sara's perspective and I don't want to understate how important another safe and effective abortion option is to women and women's health. But I also want to be clear that RU-486 is not a panacea to all of these terrorist attacks nor is it the savior for women's abortion access. There are positives and negatives to this option - though, it is an other option all the same. Thanks for writing this piece, Sara!

Amie Newman
RH Reality Check
www.rhrealitycheck.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Part ofthe reason...
Posted by: bobtr900 on Feb 14, 2008 2:12 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...the right wingers get away with such wild and pervasive hypocrisy is that the Dems are afflicted with spousal abuse syndrome. Thom Hartman of Air America Radio put forth that