COMMENTS: 59
Boobs to Die For
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Reproductive Justice headlines via email.
This article was originally posted on Nerve.com.
Last month I spent one Friday night sprawled topless on my bed while a guy named Joe twiddled my nipples until I came over and over again. My eyes rolled back in my head and my whole body bucked and twisted as he squeezed and rolled and flicked. "Oh my God," Joe kept saying, as I moaned and clawed at the sheets, "I can't believe you can do this."
My super-erogenous nipples have always been something of a shock to men, and my ability to orgasm based solely on their stimulation is seen as some kind of bizarre talent, like those people who can touch their tongue to their nose, or girls who are double-jointed. My ex-boyfriend used to idly flick one of my nips while we lay in bed in the morning, and when I winced, my back arching in an involuntary spasm of pleasure, he would raise his eyebrows and say, "Really?" his Doubting-Thomas tone unmistakable. "Yes," I'd tell him, feeling defensive. But what I meant was, Yes. Yes!
My breasts arrived right on time in sixth grade, and within two years they had grown into their full, glorious DD cup. From the start it was clear that I was supposed to be self-conscious about my boobs, hiding my bras and complaining to my friends about how embarrassing it was to find guys staring at my chest, but secretly I rejoiced in my buxom bounty. My body seemed to get everything wrong — I was too short, too round, too muscular — but finally my Eastern-European roots were smiling on me. Big, beautiful breasts. Thank God.
Those same Eastern-European roots provided a significant drawback. When I was in fifth grade I first heard the word lumpectomy in a conversation between my mother and my grandmother, who was about to undergo the procedure. I learned all kinds of other words that summer, including radiation, chemotherapy, and biopsy. On spelling tests that year we were asked to choose a difficult word we found in the dictionary or in our everyday lives and add it to the pre-assigned spelling lists. So I was ten when I learned how to spell bilateral mastectomy, though I had no idea what it meant.
My grandmother's breast cancer was treated effectively, and for a solid decade my breasts were an unadulterated joy. Sometimes my friends would complain about the frustrations of having huge boobs, and though I could sympathize to a degree, none of the downsides ever seemed that bad to me. Yes, bras and especially sports bras were difficult to find and very expensive, but it was a price I was willing to pay for the advantages of having my DDs.
When I was twenty-two I got my right nipple pierced. My friends were getting tattoos on their lower backs, but I couldn't imagine picking a design I'd have to live with for the rest of my life. The silver barbell I chose was my little punk-rock secret, never failing to elicit a gasp from the men I brought home. Sometimes guys would ask if it hurt to get it pierced, and I answered honestly: a little, but it was worth it.
That same year my aunt had an abnormal mammogram, and eventually she had a lumpectomy followed by radiation. It was becoming increasingly clear that my genes were stacked against me in the breast-cancer department, but the news didn't seem all that bad. Breast cancer was highly treatable. Practically everyone I knew had an aunt or a grandmother or a mother who'd had breast cancer at some point, and most of them were fine. I bought things with pink ribbons on them in October to be supportive. My aunt went into remission.
At twenty-three I started doing yoga every day and finally discovered one of the real disadvantages to having big breasts: while doing inverted poses, my boobs hung in front of my face making it difficult to take deep yogic breaths. My yoga teacher blushed when I explained my problem. "I-I don't know what to suggest," he stammered. I experimented with blankets and blocks, but never found anything that made it much better.
I was sitting in my car after yoga one day when my mom called and told me she had just been diagnosed with breast cancer. I shivered uncontrollably while she explained that it had been caught early, she was sure she would be fine. Those words became a mantra in the weeks that followed. Caught early, she'll be fine, I always told people. She had more tests, and she and my dad met with surgeons and oncologists to plan the best course of action. They chose to do a somewhat complicated procedure — a bilateral mastectomy, followed immediately by reconstructive surgery using fat and skin from her stomach. A boob job and a tummy tuck, we joked with each other, and both were covered by insurance. What good luck!
Stay up to date with the latest Reproductive Justice headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: anniekelleher on Nov 2, 2009 2:38 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: eosrk on Nov 2, 2009 4:01 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Nanobots
Posted by: MT512
» RE: Customized antibodies ARE, in effect, organic nanobots.
Posted by: Plexius2
Comments are closed-
Posted by: we_need_Abe on Nov 2, 2009 5:18 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The eroticism of your breasts sound like a wonderful gift!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Nov 2, 2009 5:27 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article
http://www.jacobintl.org/
which goes into detail with regards to the specific risks affecting hereditary aspects of breast cancer strongly suggests to me that your geneticist should have been delighted for you as the tests proved you had not inherited BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 gene mutation.
Regardless of other risk factors, assuming the article is true, the risk of you getting breast cancer is dramatically lower than if the test had been positive. Surely that has got to be good news. You may now be at lower risk than the general population, the vast majority of who'm will not have had such a test, and won't know whether or not they have the genetic defect.
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» There are thousands of identified genetic defects...
Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: There are thousands of identified genetic defects...
Posted by: tony_opmoc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Thresher on Nov 2, 2009 6:04 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I think the whole thing is Udder Nonsense! nm
Posted by: moloko velocet
» True: article needs a pic of author's wonderful boobs!
Posted by: Sympa
» RE: Okay so totally insensitive but...
Posted by: notyetagm
Comments are closed-
Posted by: topview on Nov 2, 2009 6:33 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the northern hemisphere we all have a deficiency of Vitamin D and you get it from Sunshine on your skin, just don't overdo it and get sunburned.
Just make sure you don't use sunscreen, and keep the chemicals off your body, like Cosmetics, hair dye, as they just make your immune system stress out.
Check out hormones and try to keep a balance in them, Estrogen, progesterone, and testosterone.
Women need testosterone as well as men.
Try to stop eating packaged and processed foods as they are loaded with cancer causing chemicals.
Just go back to basics and eat what nature has provided for us and your chances of getting cancer should be reduced drastically.
Good luck and keep them shining.
My Healthy Blog
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Yes, indeed!
Posted by: Prinzowhales
» RE: Yes, indeed!
Posted by: Xynyx
Comments are closed-
Posted by: franklyspanking on Nov 2, 2009 6:41 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Folks need to know their risks, and act accordingly. We know that. I was treated for stage I seminoma, and whereas I used to be totally crazy, now I'm only half nuts. I don't lament the loss, nor did I celebrate the existence of the tissue-gone-haywire. My kids will need to know about it, and so did my siblings just to be vigilant. It's a rather uncomplicated thing, in my opinion.
Don't mean to rain on anyone's parade; I just find these exercises in self-esteem quite odd. If that's what makes you feel happy, though, go for it by all means.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: postconsumer-consumer on Nov 2, 2009 6:43 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: It's not your boobs that will kill you
Posted by: leighsure
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gabba_Gabba_Hey on Nov 2, 2009 6:45 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I doubt this has much if anything to do with the "breast" part of the anatomy. Technically, men can get breast cancer too for instance and some do. Probably the sexual excitement involves the nipple.
There is an explanation for why men have nipples at all, which I forget!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Not women only
Posted by: Dboy
» RE: Not women only
Posted by: Squarehead
» nipples are an erogenous zone. duh!
Posted by: snideelf
Comments are closed-
Posted by: stellabloo on Nov 2, 2009 7:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"As the primary multimillion-dollar corporate sponsor of National Breast Cancer Awareness Month, pharmaceutical giant AtraZeneca, formerly Zeneca before merging with Swedish pharmaceutical Astra, was owned by Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI), a leading international manufacturer of industrial chemicals and carcinogenic pesticides. ICI manufactures the plastic ingredient polyvinyl chloride, which has been directly linked to breast cancer and the pesticide acetochlor, classified by the Environmental Protection Agency as a “probable human carcinogen.”
"AstraZeneca also manufactures pesticides, herbicides, and fungicides. ICI and AstraZeneca’s chemical plants daily release potential cancer-causing pollution into the environment. And, to top off their profitable investments, AstraZeneca also owns Salick Health Care, a wholly-owned subsidiary of AstraZeneca, provides consulting services, and manages the operation of numerous comprehensive cancer care facilities throughout the United States.
"The breast cancer epidemic is not some great mystery. The causes of cancer are already known: toxic diets, toxic lifestyles, toxic emotions, toxic environments, toxic chemicals, toxic drug treatments, and toxic diagnostics."
Corporate duplicity and greed have no limits :.(
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Secretia on Nov 2, 2009 7:33 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Secretia
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Blondinista on Nov 2, 2009 8:02 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Likewise, I always felt complacent because of my diligence to a healthy lifestyle and lack of family history. I never bothered with self breast exams, and would occasionally skip my annual mammogram. I have recently been diagnosed with breast cancer. Never saw it coming.
There are no proven or absolute methods for preventing any kind of cancer. Following a healthy lifestyle and being blessed with a lot of luck MAY lower your risks of developing this terrible disease. Early detection is critical for survival. So, please, ladies -- practice self breast exam (perhaps I would've found my tumor at an earlier stage if I had), and get your damm mammograms!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: There are no guarantees with cancer.
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» RE: There are no guarantees with cancer.
Posted by: Blondinista
» RE: There are no guarantees with cancer.
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» RE: There are no guarantees with cancer.
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» RE: There are no guarantees with cancer.
Posted by: Blondinista
» Not to rain on your faith parade Tony, but,
Posted by: LightningJoe
» RE: Not to rain on your faith parade Tony, but,
Posted by: LightningJoe
» RE: Not to rain on your faith parade Tony, but,
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» Americans Think They Are Skint And Can't Earn Their Living...
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» RE: Americans Think They Are Skint And Can't Earn Their Living...
Posted by: LightningJoe
» RE: Americans Think They Are Skint And Can't Earn Their Living...
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» LightningJoe _ This Kid Turned Up Tonight at The Jam And Blew The Arse Off Jimi Hendrix With his Axe
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» In England We Encourage Our Children To Excel At Whatever Their Talent May Be
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» RE: In England We Encourage Our Children To Excel At Whatever Their Talent May Be
Posted by: LightningJoe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: postconsumer-consumer on Nov 2, 2009 9:07 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: "Cure for Cancer" propaganda - a video clip for you
Posted by: stellabloo
» RE: The colour pink makes me sick, it's so perverse.
Posted by: LightningJoe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: armswideopen on Nov 2, 2009 12:24 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Not just large breasts
Posted by: Don_Algon
» lighten up small breasts
Posted by: we_need_Abe
» RE: Not just large breasts
Posted by: LightningJoe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PaulK on Nov 2, 2009 6:01 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
98% of us are addicted to having someone else stroke our pleasure spots. That's who we are as humans. It's nice that the author is so sexually wealthy. It's sad that her prime attraction will probably kill her off, tho.
Doubly sad that she doesn't really have to die. She's just been sold a bill of goods by modern life, usually in the person of giant manufacturing conglomerates who will probably kill her dead with toxic chems.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» So the big question is, of course... what do we do about it all?
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tremonisha on Nov 2, 2009 7:46 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for writing this incredible essay. All I can say is that it just feels very real and very courageous and full of joy.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Dankhank on Nov 2, 2009 7:58 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drinkycro on Nov 3, 2009 5:14 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Womens love my big brown balls. When I bring girls home, I like to stretch my ballskin over their nose and mouth. Usually they like it and compliment the "nutty" aroma.
Recently my grandad passed on. He tripped over his big balls and went to Jesus. I never knew my father well. He passed in the 1st gulf war when his big balls brushed against a land mine.
I'm still not wearing underwear though. I'm ready to face what comes...with my big brown balls...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Balls to Die For
Posted by: americancontragenic
Comments are closed-
Posted by: postconsumer-consumer on Nov 3, 2009 6:15 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: miraker on Nov 3, 2009 11:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: uncertain on Nov 3, 2009 10:24 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fucking disgusting.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Sheesh.
Posted by: maglindracia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: 3pieknow on Nov 7, 2009 3:52 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: 3pieknow
Posted by: maglindracia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: eosrk on Nov 8, 2009 8:51 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: anniekelleher on Nov 2, 2009 2:38 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: eosrk on Nov 2, 2009 4:01 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Nanobots
Posted by: MT512
» RE: Customized antibodies ARE, in effect, organic nanobots.
Posted by: Plexius2
Comments are closed-
Posted by: we_need_Abe on Nov 2, 2009 5:18 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The eroticism of your breasts sound like a wonderful gift!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Nov 2, 2009 5:27 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article
http://www.jacobintl.org/
which goes into detail with regards to the specific risks affecting hereditary aspects of breast cancer strongly suggests to me that your geneticist should have been delighted for you as the tests proved you had not inherited BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 gene mutation.
Regardless of other risk factors, assuming the article is true, the risk of you getting breast cancer is dramatically lower than if the test had been positive. Surely that has got to be good news. You may now be at lower risk than the general population, the vast majority of who'm will not have had such a test, and won't know whether or not they have the genetic defect.
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» There are thousands of identified genetic defects...
Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: There are thousands of identified genetic defects...
Posted by: tony_opmoc
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Thresher on Nov 2, 2009 6:04 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I think the whole thing is Udder Nonsense! nm
Posted by: moloko velocet
» True: article needs a pic of author's wonderful boobs!
Posted by: Sympa
» RE: Okay so totally insensitive but...
Posted by: notyetagm
Comments are closed-
Posted by: topview on Nov 2, 2009 6:33 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the northern hemisphere we all have a deficiency of Vitamin D and you get it from Sunshine on your skin, just don't overdo it and get sunburned.
Just make sure you don't use sunscreen, and keep the chemicals off your body, like Cosmetics, hair dye, as they just make your immune system stress out.
Check out hormones and try to keep a balance in them, Estrogen, progesterone, and testosterone.
Women need testosterone as well as men.
Try to stop eating packaged and processed foods as they are loaded with cancer causing chemicals.
Just go back to basics and eat what nature has provided for us and your chances of getting cancer should be reduced drastically.
Good luck and keep them shining.
My Healthy Blog
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Yes, indeed!
Posted by: Prinzowhales
» RE: Yes, indeed!
Posted by: Xynyx
Comments are closed-
Posted by: franklyspanking on Nov 2, 2009 6:41 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Folks need to know their risks, and act accordingly. We know that. I was treated for stage I seminoma, and whereas I used to be totally crazy, now I'm only half nuts. I don't lament the loss, nor did I celebrate the existence of the tissue-gone-haywire. My kids will need to know about it, and so did my siblings just to be vigilant. It's a rather uncomplicated thing, in my opinion.
Don't mean to rain on anyone's parade; I just find these exercises in self-esteem quite odd. If that's what makes you feel happy, though, go for it by all means.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: postconsumer-consumer on Nov 2, 2009 6:43 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: It's not your boobs that will kill you
Posted by: leighsure
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gabba_Gabba_Hey on Nov 2, 2009 6:45 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I doubt this has much if anything to do with the "breast" part of the anatomy. Technically, men can get breast cancer too for instance and some do. Probably the sexual excitement involves the nipple.
There is an explanation for why men have nipples at all, which I forget!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Not women only
Posted by: Dboy
» RE: Not women only
Posted by: Squarehead
» nipples are an erogenous zone. duh!
Posted by: snideelf
Comments are closed-
Posted by: stellabloo on Nov 2, 2009 7:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"As the primary multimillion-dollar corporate sponsor of National Breast Cancer Awareness Month, pharmaceutical giant AtraZeneca, formerly Zeneca before merging with Swedish pharmaceutical Astra, was owned by Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI), a leading international manufacturer of industrial chemicals and carcinogenic pesticides. ICI manufactures the plastic ingredient polyvinyl chloride, which has been directly linked to breast cancer and the pesticide acetochlor, classified by the Environmental Protection Agency as a “probable human carcinogen.”
"AstraZeneca also manufactures pesticides, herbicides, and fungicides. ICI and AstraZeneca’s chemical plants daily release potential cancer-causing pollution into the environment. And, to top off their profitable investments, AstraZeneca also owns Salick Health Care, a wholly-owned subsidiary of AstraZeneca, provides consulting services, and manages the operation of numerous comprehensive cancer care facilities throughout the United States.
"The breast cancer epidemic is not some great mystery. The causes of cancer are already known: toxic diets, toxic lifestyles, toxic emotions, toxic environments, toxic chemicals, toxic drug treatments, and toxic diagnostics."
Corporate duplicity and greed have no limits :.(
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Secretia on Nov 2, 2009 7:33 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Secretia
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Blondinista on Nov 2, 2009 8:02 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Likewise, I always felt complacent because of my diligence to a healthy lifestyle and lack of family history. I never bothered with self breast exams, and would occasionally skip my annual mammogram. I have recently been diagnosed with breast cancer. Never saw it coming.
There are no proven or absolute methods for preventing any kind of cancer. Following a healthy lifestyle and being blessed with a lot of luck MAY lower your risks of developing this terrible disease. Early detection is critical for survival. So, please, ladies -- practice self breast exam (perhaps I would've found my tumor at an earlier stage if I had), and get your damm mammograms!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: There are no guarantees with cancer.
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» RE: There are no guarantees with cancer.
Posted by: Blondinista
» RE: There are no guarantees with cancer.
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» RE: There are no guarantees with cancer.
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» RE: There are no guarantees with cancer.
Posted by: Blondinista
» Not to rain on your faith parade Tony, but,
Posted by: LightningJoe
» RE: Not to rain on your faith parade Tony, but,
Posted by: LightningJoe
» RE: Not to rain on your faith parade Tony, but,
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» Americans Think They Are Skint And Can't Earn Their Living...
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» RE: Americans Think They Are Skint And Can't Earn Their Living...
Posted by: LightningJoe
» RE: Americans Think They Are Skint And Can't Earn Their Living...
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» LightningJoe _ This Kid Turned Up Tonight at The Jam And Blew The Arse Off Jimi Hendrix With his Axe
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» In England We Encourage Our Children To Excel At Whatever Their Talent May Be
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» RE: In England We Encourage Our Children To Excel At Whatever Their Talent May Be
Posted by: LightningJoe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: postconsumer-consumer on Nov 2, 2009 9:07 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: "Cure for Cancer" propaganda - a video clip for you
Posted by: stellabloo
» RE: The colour pink makes me sick, it's so perverse.
Posted by: LightningJoe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: armswideopen on Nov 2, 2009 12:24 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Not just large breasts
Posted by: Don_Algon
» lighten up small breasts
Posted by: we_need_Abe
» RE: Not just large breasts
Posted by: LightningJoe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PaulK on Nov 2, 2009 6:01 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
98% of us are addicted to having someone else stroke our pleasure spots. That's who we are as humans. It's nice that the author is so sexually wealthy. It's sad that her prime attraction will probably kill her off, tho.
Doubly sad that she doesn't really have to die. She's just been sold a bill of goods by modern life, usually in the person of giant manufacturing conglomerates who will probably kill her dead with toxic chems.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» So the big question is, of course... what do we do about it all?
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tremonisha on Nov 2, 2009 7:46 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for writing this incredible essay. All I can say is that it just feels very real and very courageous and full of joy.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Dankhank on Nov 2, 2009 7:58 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drinkycro on Nov 3, 2009 5:14 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Womens love my big brown balls. When I bring girls home, I like to stretch my ballskin over their nose and mouth. Usually they like it and compliment the "nutty" aroma.
Recently my grandad passed on. He tripped over his big balls and went to Jesus. I never knew my father well. He passed in the 1st gulf war when his big balls brushed against a land mine.
I'm still not wearing underwear though. I'm ready to face what comes...with my big brown balls...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Balls to Die For
Posted by: americancontragenic
Comments are closed-
Posted by: postconsumer-consumer on Nov 3, 2009 6:15 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: miraker on Nov 3, 2009 11:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: uncertain on Nov 3, 2009 10:24 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fucking disgusting.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Sheesh.
Posted by: maglindracia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: 3pieknow on Nov 7, 2009 3:52 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: 3pieknow
Posted by: maglindracia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: eosrk on Nov 8, 2009 8:51 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
The Dark Side of Birth Control: The Pill Still Has Many Adverse Affects Glossed Over By Big Pharma
Moore and Maddow Agree: Things Are Pretty Screwed up
The Dangers of Hormone Therapy: Why Is It Still Prescribed?





