Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Reproductive Justice and Gender

Is the Catholic Leadership Trying to Silence Nuns?

By Maureen Fiedler, Ms. Magazine. Posted October 27, 2009.


The Vatican's secretive investigations of American nuns is seen by many as attempts to intimidate outspoken, liberal nuns into submission.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Over the past year, the Vatican has initiated two chilling investigations of American nuns’ communities. Nuns are not singing “hallelujah.”

“The planned visitation comes as a surprise,” was the polite public reaction from the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR) to “apostolic visitations” launched in late 2008. The nuns’ community leaders are being sent questionnaires about their practices, followed in some cases by on-site visits in 2010. The second is a “doctrinal” investigation, launched in early 2009, looking at the adherence of nuns in leadership posts to selected church doctrines. But why these investigations, and why American nuns?

The Vatican cites as an excuse the sharp decline in membership in U.S. communities of nuns, from about 180,000 in the 1970s to about 59,000 today, and the lack of young women joining the sisterhood. But that decline has been trending for 40 years, and in Europe—where there have been no investigations—communities of nuns have shown even greater decline. Some conservative sisters take the investigations at face value as a benign attempt to rebuild membership. But most progressive nuns suspect a desire  by the church hierarchy to rein in the independent lifestyles and ministries of active, often outspoken, feminist women, and to push them back into highly scheduled convent living and recognizable religious garb (habits).

Other nuns see the investigations as an attempt to silence their cries against injustices in the church. Fueling such suspicions are the three targets of the doctrinal investigation: It will assess whether nuns’ leaders accept the all-male priesthood, adhere to church teaching that homosexual activity is “intrinsically disordered,” and believe that only the Catholic Church provides salvation, while other Christian churches have “defects.”

Those teachings have been challenged for years by prominent theologians. Many nuns have been active for decades in the movement for women’s ordination to the priesthood. Some nuns have questioned teachings on contraception and abortion. Others have defended the rights of gays and lesbians, and still others work for interfaith understanding and collaboration. Perhaps the Vatican is most afraid of how public American nuns have become. Although nuns are not clergy, they are often seen by laypeople as a kind of pseudo-clergy: “publicly Catholic.” Feminist theologian Mary Hunt puts it this way: “The power to be ‘publicly’ Catholic [is] something the men have long reserved for themselves. Now that Catholic women, including nuns, are saying, ‘This is what Catholic looks like,’ there is trouble in Vatican City.”

The investigations are shrouded in secrecy. In August, LCWR publicly complained about the lack of transparency in the process, and asked bluntly who is funding the project. “They haven’t given us a reason for the investigation of nuns in this coun- try that makes sense,” says Sr. Joan Chittister, a Benedictine nun, a fem- inist and author of many books on spirituality. “It has simply deleted the whole notion of woman as a partici- pating moral agent in her own life and the evaluation of it.”  

Pick up a copy of the Fall 2009 issue of Ms. on newsstands Nov 3, or have a copy sent to  your door by joining the Ms. community at www.msmagazine.com  .


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: feminism, women, vatican, catholics, nuns

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Reproductive Justice and Gender! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
An ex-Muslim psychiatrist is attacked for apostasy.
Posted by: flymulla on Oct 27, 2009 6:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bill McKibben believes we must reduce our carbon emissions immediately, or else face disaster. Chris Hedges says that until we defeat corporate power, we can't address anything.
Elisabeth. I am a Muslim Shia by faith the firm believer of the Quran and the Ahlul Bait (The family of the Prophet Mohammed SWA (or as you Westerns say PBUP peace be upon him)
I differ. Islam on the couch. In fact, your title ought to be Islam woke us up. Is that true? You look at the few Chador and Jihadists and sum up that Islam (mind you I am not talking of Ireland, as I have nothing against any religion (as Islam tell us, “Thee Do not mock at any lest they mock at you. Look at the politicians stealing, taking bribes CIS arm twisting with FBI truncheon and handcuffed ready to wake up the three NetWest in the middle of night in UK , grab them in pajama suits shift them overnight like DHL to USA without wives knowledge. Is tat America? No. It is few rotten bananas like Tony Blaire who did not sign the give and take agreement. He is put UK where? In the gutter and Brown seems to be following the tar coal roadmaps that make any one sleep on the couch. McKibben, in YES! Magazine on October 15, writes that we can't let the atmosphere contain more than 350 million parts per million of carbon dioxide, or else face total environmental catastrophe, problem being that we've already passed this number. He's helped organize a day of action on October 24 to push and make it happen. Chris Hedges' response in TruthDig channels the radical thinking of Derek Jensen and argues that there is no possible way to address the release of carbon dioxide without addressing the way industrial society without addressing corporate power:
Sultan, in Arabic mean ruler and she is but a slave of the brain wired wrongly.
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gilhowcan
Posted by: gilhowcan on Oct 27, 2009 10:26 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's news about this? And it's not just nuns. The Catholic Church, ever since the Emperor Constantine took it into royalty, power mongering, and all the evil pursuits that followed 315 in Nicaea, has always shut up its members, all of them, when they dared to think and speak differently that their royal highnesses. The Vatican rules supreme! If you wish to remain in that gang of rigid extremists, you must leave all reason at the baptismal font. To hell with the pope! To hell with the Vatican! Catholics all over the world need to revolt against this ancient madness!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: gilhowcan Posted by: Truelass
» RE: Anti-Christ Posted by: johnbradleycopeland
Sisters of Mercy are no more !
Posted by: Andrew_S on Oct 28, 2009 3:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The last vestiges of Sisterhood in any religious connation is now surely lost to the newer form of feminism. The rejuvenation process to and for novitiates in any denomination to subscribe to would not meet the criteria for the modern consumer feminist. Either by doctrine or coercion since it espouses a male as it's centrist figure. So out with the old and when I say old I mean old we are talking an average age of 62 for sisters cloistered or otherwise. So as the sisters give up on society to earn a long deserved retirement of sorts, and most to sadly see their lifes works turned into zero for the NWO. They also as a result no longer compete against federal policy and those assets real or otherwise can be sequestered or acquired to service more meaningful purposes. So whats the big deal and why the story, the sisters have been media targets for some pretty nasty shortcomings. So let us see them into their twighlight of oblivion much as the Dodo and anything else no longer politically or commercially exploitable nor independent. Adieu to a life that few of us would have the fortitude to submit to and in with the new Big Bro Consumer Brotherhood type of religion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Isn't it true that the Office of the Inquisition still exists?
Posted by: Bob Doublin on Oct 28, 2009 2:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They're just ITCHIN' to fire it up again.(pun intended) Hey ,they can hire the d00dz from Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib, if nothing more than at least as trainers and consultants. They probably consulted Charles Henry Lea's book on the Witch Hunts as a manual in the first place.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Liberal" Nones? Really?
Posted by: jmmartin on Oct 28, 2009 4:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What on earth are those pesky nones up to now?! I thought, like penguins, they already were an endangered species. Maybe more and more of them are sneaking off into the internet chapel to learn that half the Catholic priests in Europe are married.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement