Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Reproductive Justice and Gender

Gloria Steinem: Why We Should Be Both Optimistic and Cautious About a New Report on Women in the Workplace

By Gloria Steinem, Women's Media Center. Posted October 19, 2009.


The Shriver Report stands to attract some serious (and overdue) attention to a woman's role in the workplace. Whether that will translate to action is yet unclear.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

For the first time in the history of the United States, half of all people on payrolls are women. This big landmark is the centerpiece of The Shriver Report: A Woman's Nation Changes Everything, a newly released 400-plus page study that includes a national poll of changing attitudes among women and men, and two dozen essays from experts on various aspects of women's status, including Billie Jean King, Oprah and others who have lived it.

Women have won a new opportunity not only for themselves but for men. Men now have the chance to be great supporters of powerful women, to relate to them in whole new ways, to nurture and empathize with our children, and central to it all, to develop our own full humanity. So, I say thanks to the feminists, the suffragettes, the quiet courageous women, and the good men who opened two-way doors to exciting new worlds.

Time magazine, which consulted on the poll, is releasing a related cover story today, and NBC, which provided free office space and other in-kind support, will make it the subject of a week of television programming.

The creators of this campaign to launch a national conversation are Maria Shriver, who lent her skill at cross-country interviewing and wisdom from running the California Women's Conference, plus the Center for American Progress, a Washington think tank self-described as a source of progressive ideas, and headed by John Podesta, former chief-of-staff for President Bill Clinton. The result is a freestanding project with Rockefeller Foundation and other private support, and also a very conscious echo of a government commission and report on the status of American women that was ordered up by Shriver's uncle, President John F. Kennedy, almost 50 years ago. Headed by Eleanor Roosevelt, it set up state commissions that led to the founding of the National Organization for Women.

Will this $250,000 poll and estimated $2 million project succeed in creating real change where so many others have failed? The report itself headlines such warnings as "Plenty of study, few results: Real family friendly workplace reform is long overdue." It lists some of the many prestigious calls for, say, a national system of childcare; an area in which every other modern democracy has long done better than the United States. In the Nixon era when women were a third of the paid labor force, for instance, Congress passed childcare legislation, only to see it vetoed as "family-weakening." Now that women are half of all workers with incomes that are necessary to 80 percent of families—indeed, 40 percent of babies are now born to single mothers—childcare is still nowhere on the list of priorities in Congress, and we have also become the only industrialized country without any requirement of paid family leave.

The good news is that The Shriver Report is useful, timely, enlightening and even enjoyable to read—an improvement over many such studies—and could inform discussions from the kitchen table to the halls of Congress. At a minimum, it should end forever the debate about women's place in the labor force; women are the labor force. It also goes into such deeper places as the racial and economic disparities in women's health and the invisible and essential jobs done by immigrant women. It also exposes the frequent truth that women are better educated than men yet it doesn't afford them equal advancement, and critiques the media for portraying women as far more successful than they really are, thus creating the myth that no more progress is needed.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: women, shriver report

Gloria Steinem travels widely as a feminist activist, organizer, writer and lecturer. She is co-founder of the Women's Media Center, and a board member of Equality Now, a group that advocates for women's rights globally. She was an editor of The Reader's Companion to U.S. Women's History and a member of the Beyond Racism Initiative, a comparative study of racial patterns in the United States, South Africa, and Brazil.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Reproductive Justice and Gender! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Job Losses
Posted by: femtobeam on Oct 20, 2009 12:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Job losses in the US are as a result of unfair trade practices with large population and cheap labor countries like China and India.

Trade agreements supporting large industries such as tobacco and cattle have been used to trade our future industries like electronics and biofuels. There are no economic generators as a result of off shore manufacturing locations. Those plants owned by foreign investors in the US do not benefit the US Federal tax base. As a result, there are fewer jobs and less money to divide and use for social services, like child care.

The astronomical DOD budgets and trillions spent on black ops budgets seem to be "hands off" in any discussion about social services, like health care, school lunches, or even minimum wages, that Senator Ted Kennedy fought for all of his adult life.

With 40% of children born to single mothers and the current political environment discouraging birth control and family planning, women have to work to support themselves. Divorce rates and absent fathers who pay no child support or can't become a burden on these mothers as well. Married women and their husbands both face highly competitive job entry and older people and high school graduates are just out of luck for any decent wage earning job.

Increases created by a greedy insurance, private hospital and pharmaceutical conglomerate (or mob), will be hardest on these Americans.

It is time to look at it for what it is... a decreasing pie for the average American due to trade practices favoring large corporations instead of small businesses and large population nations at the expense of jobs and the health of all Americans, especially children. Their chances of achieving the American dream are less than the baby boomers had.

The money and power are now in the firm control of the very few, who were not subjected to regulation and enforcement of the law. They have too much leverage in deciding our future as being too big to fail in obtaining subsidized subcontractor relationships with the Government.

Instead of improving services for the public, privatization has caused disasters, like Plum Island and health care. The only ones who benefit are thc corporate executives who take an astronomical profit and which must continue to grow in order to maintain shareholder value.

Now, with brain interface communications just on the horizon, these children face a far greater danger of becoming enslaved in a society that has no future for them except subservience. This is particularly true if women's rights are reversed by the New World Order, which has an abysmal history in women's rights as does most of the World.

Basic rights we take for granted now are by no means assured as voices and resistance to oppression are subdued by control over the Internet and embedded devices. The equipment was not "Made in America".

The borrowed money we now spend is supporting populations and workers elsewhere means we cannot compete with due to the sheer difference in numbers. It is spent by the benefactors like China, Korea, and Japan on militarization, instead of lifting the lifestyles of the people in those countries.

What they will do with their investments and our future as well as their own is up to them, not us. We are slowly losing military might with our economic decline and the changing nature of conflict itself into net centric warfare.

While they can, women should make their voices count in the voting booth, in the stores and in the media. We need to export women's rights and gain support throughout the World.

What is needed is a "Jobs for Men, Jobs for Women, Futures for Children", agenda.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Any discussion of women's best interests
Posted by: cdlepthien on Oct 20, 2009 5:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in the economy should probably start with a discussion of how poorly the neo-classical economic model serves women in particular. It is that paradigm, or more accurately, ideology, that is preventing the acceptance of policies that would obviously be good for the average woman/family/man. Such as single-payer health care, longer parental leave times, available high-quality child care, decent schools, etc.

The ruling class wants to see a maximum of work hours for both us and the Chinese - the more economic activity they can engender, the more money they can skim off the top.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement