Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Reproductive Justice and Gender

How We Sabotage Young Girls

By Rachel Simmons, The Penguin Press. Posted September 1, 2009.


Girls are encouraged to be nice, quiet, perfect, polite -- at the expense of their authenticity and sense of self.
curseofthegoodgirl
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Excerpted from The Curse of the Good Girl: Raising Authentic Girls with Courage and Confidence by Rachel Simmons. Reprinted by arrangement with The Penguin Press, a member of Penguin Group (USA), Inc. Copyright (c) August, 2009.

Our culture is teaching girls to embrace a version of selfhood that sharply curtails their power and potential. In particular, the pressure to be “Good”—unerringly nice, polite, modest, and selfless—diminishes girls’ authenticity and personal authority.

The Curse of the Good Girl erects a psychological glass ceiling that begins its destructive sprawl in girlhood and extends across the female life span, stunting the growth of skills and habits essential to becoming a strong woman. This book traces the impact of the curse on girls’ development, and provides parents with the strategies to break its spell.

Almost ten years ago, I founded the Girls Leadership Institute, a summer enrichment program for middle- and high-school girls. I began asking largely middle-class groups of girls to describe how society expected a Good Girl to look and act. Here is a sample response:

Blue eyes
Honorable
Respectful
Little girl
Tons of friends
Always busy
Quiet
Polite
Organized
Perfect
Enthusiastic
Flirtatious
Sheltered
Generous
Skinny
Good grades
Kind
Speaks well
Studies
Boyfriend
Follows the rules
No opinions on things
Intelligent
Doesn’t get mad
Well rounded
Conservative
Healthy
Follower
Popular
Average
Preppy
Wealthy
Barbie
Has to do everything right
Athletic
Confident
Natural hair
Perfect attendance
Doesn’t show skin
Listens
Façade never cracks
High expectations
Honest
People pleaser

The Good Girl was socially and academically successful, smart and driven, pretty and kind. But she was also an individual who aimed to please (people pleaser), toed the line (no opinions on things) and didn’t take risks (follows the rules). She repressed what she really thought (doesn’t get mad) and did not handle her mistakes with humor (has to do everything right).

The Good Girl walked a treacherous line, balancing mixed messages about how far she should go and how strong she should be: she was to be enthusiastic while being quiet; smart with no opinions on things; intelligent but a follower; popular but quiet. She would be something, but not too much.

We live in the age of the fiercely successful “amazing girl.” Girls outnumber boys in college and graduate school. They graduate at higher rates. In high school, girls pursue more leadership roles and extracurricular activities than boys do, and they are significantly more likely to see themselves as leaders.

But if their college applications are stamped with twenty-first-century girl power, girls’ psychological résumés lag generations behind. The Curse of the Good Girl erodes girls’ ability to know, say, and manage a complete range of feelings. It urges girls to be perfect, giving them a troubled relationship to integrity and failure. It expects girls to be selfless, limiting the expression of their needs. It demands modesty, depriving girls of permission to commit to their strengths and goals. It diminishes assertive body language, quieting voices and weakening handshakes. It reaches across all areas of girls’ lives: in their interactions with boys and other girls, at school, at home, and in extracurricular life. The Curse of the Good Girl cuts to the core of authentic selfhood, demanding that girls curb the strongest feelings and desires that form the patchwork of a person.

The curse is the product of a culture that remains confused about gender equality. In Meeting at the Crossroads, Lyn Mikel Brown and Carol Gilligan documented a crisis of connection in girls approaching adolescence. Girls withheld their true thoughts and feelings in an attempt to maintain “perfect” relationships. Nearly twenty years later, little has changed. In a 2006 study by Girls, Inc., 74 percent of girls said they were under a lot of pressure to please everyone, a nearly nine-point increase from 2000. Nearly half the girls surveyed said that “girls are told not to brag about the things they do well” and that the “smartest girls in my school are not popular.” A majority said they were expected to speak softly and not cause trouble.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: gender, gender equality, glass ceiling, gender issues, girl

Rachel Simmons is the author of New York Times bestseller Odd Girl Out: The Hidden Culture of Aggression in Girls. Simmons works internationally with girls, parents, and teachers to develop strategies to address bullying and to empower girls. Simmons is the founding director of the Girls' Leadership Institute, a summer program for middle-school and high school girls, and currently serves as a consultant to schools & organizations around the world.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Reproductive Justice and Gender! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Pamela McGhee, PMP, President and Owner, MCGHEE ENTERPRISES, Project Management Consultants
Posted by: pamcghee on Sep 1, 2009 8:37 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sometime in my late 20's, I refused to be a "good girl" and paid a heavy price. There were hints of my directions since my early teens (got lots of opposition from a misogynist father), but I tried to play the game until it became undo-able for me.

Men found me boastful and self-interested, always talking about my own goals and not about them, when I waxed poetic about forming my own business - one said, "Now, you are impossible!"

I ditched them, and remained alone to this day.
Can't say that I'd do anything differently, but there was a price to pay.
Pamela McGhee
63 year old black woman with degrees and professional certifications.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

oh, god...now i have to be "authentic", too...
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Sep 2, 2009 5:27 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
*rolls eyes*

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

These Are Very Important Things to Say
Posted by: Red State Gal on Sep 2, 2009 11:12 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I watched this very thing happen to my own daughter, even though I myself am a rebel. It destroyed her. She pleased all her friends, lost all her values, did not say no to those who abused her. She's dead now; died at 18.

This message needs to be heard in every household where a girl is being raised. I applaud the author for writing this book!

Red State Gal
RedStateFeminists

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good Girl from Indiana
Posted by: terradea42 on Sep 3, 2009 4:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Raised to be respectful and nice, I really suffered after moving to Chicago as an adult. I was never taught how to protect myself and was taken advantage of by every homeless creep on the bus. When a smelly, bug-infested old man sat next to me and looked up my skirt, I didn't move because I thought it would be rude. I let bosses sexually harass me because I thought that was part of working. It took years to get over the "good girl" upbringing. I'm not perfect, but at least I've trained myself to be somewhat assertive now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Good Girl from Indiana Posted by: TheNamelessCity
» RE: Good Girl from Indiana Posted by: daniel347x
» RE: Good Girl from Indiana Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
» Rude Girls from Chicago? Posted by: Gabba_Gabba_Hey
Ho Hum
Posted by: Lilly on Sep 14, 2009 12:32 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't this article about forty years late? We already did this bit back in the 1960's.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Please read better... Posted by: hera62
» RE: Please read better... Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
» RE: Please read better... Posted by: Elfwyn
Sabotage
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Sep 14, 2009 2:15 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How ironic. An article about women trying to be what other people tell them to be, which gives them instructions on how to be. You're just trading one convoluted mess of nitpicking and overanalysis for another.

The best advice, I think, is for women to stop listening to other women. Put all the self-help books down, step away slowly, and go have a beer with the guys.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sabotage Posted by: emen
» RE: Sabotage Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Sabotage Posted by: luzmejor
Hard-earned antennae
Posted by: La Colombetta on Sep 14, 2009 3:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am the daughter of a mother who expected not a peep out of me, even as I was being abused by two members of the family. Whenever she thought I was 'acting out,' or God forbid, about to say anything, she would squeeze my fingers until my knuckles went white, as though she wanted to squeeze the very life out of me.

Today, I may not be the most assertive or vocal person in the room, but upon encountering any individual with even the slightest trait in common with mother dearest, I am miles away before you can even say 'people pleaser.'

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

work
Posted by: sureshot45 on Sep 14, 2009 3:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
just had my evaluation at my job about 3 months ago. while my boss said that i am his brightest and most productive employee (there are just 5 of us) he followed that with..but you are too forthcoming and temperamental.

riiiight. if i was a man, i would have been offered a raise and promotion. but as i women, i was not so gently reminded to keep my mouth shut.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: work Posted by: wal55
» RE: work Posted by: sureshot45
» RE: work Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: work Posted by: av3032
Difference between big cities & the rest of the country?
Posted by: Gabba_Gabba_Hey on Sep 14, 2009 4:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Girls are encouraged to be nice, quiet, perfect, polite..."

You've never been to Boston, have you? If you find a nice, quiet, polite girl here, tell a TV station so it'll make the 5 o'clock news! And if you've ever "seen" NYC you didn't get to the outer boroughs.

As "Good Girl from Indiana" above understands now in Chicago, there seems to be a big disparity between the way girls in the big cities & near suburbs are raised and the way girls in more remote areas are raised.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What decade do you live in...
Posted by: progressive-life on Sep 14, 2009 5:07 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
those times are long gone! The message for women today is be assertive, confident while at the same time not losing their femininity - not a bad thing at all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Shut down--by her own sex
Posted by: littlepitcher on Sep 14, 2009 5:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The weaponry the patriarchy uses are shock troops of our own sex, our own peers, our own coworkers. The threat to girls and women of being "shut down and having everyone turned against me" is real, and is perpetrated daily.

When the threat is carried out, you have no social network, no employment, no lovers. I've been through it, I'll never back down or shut up, and if you think I've quit--sugar, I'm just studying your sorry butts again.

Time for girls and women to rebel, en masse, against the tyrannies of these bush-league public relations artistes. The irony is that these "good girls" are the first to backstab, the first to whip the rebels into passivity and acceptance of their divine rule.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What about choice? Well, since you've thrown that out the window, at least sell tickets...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Sep 14, 2009 5:43 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...it's going to be interesting watching you try to train your females to bark viciously on command.

Oh, and that's exactly what's wrong with this country: too many polite* people. I guess, had that silly "You Lie!" congressman been a congresswoman, your personal Nirvana would have come to pass?

My suggestion: quit objectifying females and just let them grow up to be themselves, rather than form them around your particular "vision" for this abstract, dumb notion termed 'society'.

*My opinion is that it's an overpopulation of the willfully ignorant, but that would obviously have cut into your book sales.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I have some good, bad and real characteristics
Posted by: Angie on Sep 14, 2009 5:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, it's almost cruel to raise a girl to be passive, docile and compliant, and then send her off into a predatory world...expecting her to be successful.

This is my favorite part of the article:
"...she can manage the needs of others without sacrificing the integrity of her own. A Real Girl can defend her interests in a relationship or advocate on her own behalf. Where a Good Girl might meet someone and automatically hope she is likable, a Real Girl will reflect on what she thinks and feels about the other person before deciding what to do next."

Being desired, respected, loved... is the motivation behind a lot of what we do. Oftentimes, being true to ourselves generates more authentic appreciation.

Now we need some guidelines on how society could benefit from guys being raised to be nicer, more diplomatic, selfless. Or not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Difference between a "Feminist" and a "Libber"
Posted by: Purple Girl on Sep 14, 2009 5:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Libbers" do not consider women like Sarah palin, Michelle Bachmann or Prejean, 'Libbers'. They are women who not only concede to mens expectations but the media's.
They are the preverbial 50's wives. Trying to meet an image of Feminity portrayed by both- the desires of Men and the perfectionism of Media.
But they have gotten caught up with the same egocentrism as the Good Ol Boys- as long as they candidate has the Look they will vote for them regardless of their ideas. "Vagina Voters" I call them. And NOW has become the torch bearer of this dumbing down and betrayal to our gender. They supported Hillary even though her votes on womens issues were worse than Obama's!She not only voted for the Wars, but helped provide our Children and our Money to the Cause (Armed Services committee)
That's not only blatant sexism, it's voting against your own interests! That's like a middle classer voting for Tax cuts for the Wealthy.
How do you discern a 'Feminist' from a 'Libber' ask them if Women should be Drafted should that ever return.
Feminists want all the priviledges of 'equality' but none of the Responsiblities.
Libbers accept the downside as well as the Upside to True Equality. We also never ask for the Bar to be lowered, the rules changed nor special consideration merely because of what is on our chests or between our legs.
We can play ball with the Big Boys without such patronizing accomodations, and win.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What about Good Boys? And I got laughed and shot at thrice for being one.
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 14, 2009 6:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've met as many nasty girls as I did nasty boys in my life time. Thank God my wife isn't any of that !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hmm, Taylor Swift should have swift-kicked Kanye in the Taylors...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Sep 14, 2009 7:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/TV/09/14/
mtv.music.video.awards/index.html

Now that would have been progress for a female, and a strike against the misogynist fringe establishment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

An analogy concerning why I respect a woman
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on Sep 14, 2009 7:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a guy.
I am bored by the sort of milquetoast woman described above and, the following is why.

I have an ex with whom I am close friends. We love each other while we cannot be married to each other.
She is assertive and intelligent.
Part of her being a REAL WOMAN is how she conducts her life making HER OWN choices according to how she feels as an individual.
She understands and has moved past the "You should" bullshit.

I have some golfing partners who are women.
When one of them hits a bad shot, she'll say, "FUCK!!"
I sure as hell can't see one of these "good girls' be so clearly ASSERTIVE and, assertiveness is what that saying, "FUCK!!" represents.
A woman who is in charge of herself is assertive, confident, adventurous and ambitious.
One of these is Pamela McGhee who commented above.
I applaud her for her ownership of self.

Now, just as the attitudes of those who would call her a pushy female are wrong, it is just as wrong to negate my comments only because I am a man.
Not ALL of those of either gender possess this repressive attitude about the other.
Those of us of either gender who are more complete as human beings look others as individuals rather than carbon copies of what the repressors hope us to be.

So, a person can be the true definition of a "good girl" or a "good boy" without being a living caricature of what others such as the "good old buys" and/or the "good old girls" decide we "SHOULD" be.

Illegitimi non carborundum!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Aren't We Forgetting Something?
Posted by: Gravitas on Sep 14, 2009 7:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is beyond me how someone could do an article about society forcing girls to be compliant and NOT emphasize weight and the pressure to be thin. There is nothing that says "good girl" in this society more than the girl who doesn't eat or denies herself pleasure in food. Studies also show that dieting leads to passive attitudes so it is one powerful mechanism for social enforcement of norms. Yet, studies show when you ask girls what they MOST want, the majority of them will say to lose weight and keep it off. All that time, talent and energy going to a social imposed ideal of femininity. Discussing feminism without talking significantly about weight in contemporary Western society is like talking about women's roles in ancient China while ignoring foot binding.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Public School vs. Real Girls
Posted by: democracy on Sep 14, 2009 7:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The public school system is structurally incapable of seriously supporting the development of real girls. My girls attend a Sudbury School, www.fairhavenschool.com, where real girls grow, develop, and thrive.

Public schools, structurally, foster the development of good girls. It is what they are designed to do. To succeed in public school, you have no choice but to be a good girl.

The problem is with the school. It isn't a timeless problem, it is one that has been manufactured.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I never understood... Posted by: theblackgeorgecarlin
» The Weak Male Posted by: MT512
Blind Leading the Blind Again
Posted by: stellabloo on Sep 14, 2009 8:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I give respect to the author because she has been actually working in this field for years, as opposed to dilettante home office journalism.

That said, how do you expect women to teach their daughters authenticity and fearlessness when they spent their own lives conforming to societal norms?

It took me a long time to break free from society's mould but maybe the only reason I ever did was because I was never really in it. Back in my day Farah Fawcett was the teen wet dream and my bulkiness and frizzy hair didn't fit the dream at all, at all.

It took years of hard work to transform the bulkiness into muscle (which good girls most emphatically do NOT have) and even more years and the threat of losing my child to transform me from a people-pleaser to someone unafraid to speak their mind. Trial by fire and I would not wish that crucible on others.

I so feel for the kids who do not have a strong and sensible adult to turn to - there are so many of them :.(

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This woman is SELLING something
Posted by: Elfwyn on Sep 14, 2009 9:06 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She's selling a book and trolling for clients. Good grief.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This woman is SELLING something Posted by: kepstein7777
Here we go again: right vs. left, gay vs. straight, Democrat vs. Republican, young vs. old,
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Sep 14, 2009 9:34 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Christian vs. Muslim, white vs. black, etc., etc.,

It's called divide & concur, and it keeps us from addressing real problems like poverty, unemployment, endless wars, healthcare, creeping fascism, etc., etc.,

Wake-up, sheeple!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Satire of the Century
Posted by: eagleeye on Sep 14, 2009 12:40 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This has got to be the satire of the century. The first thing that a foreigner notes when he arrives in America is how loud and unruly American women are. American men and me included are terrified of white American women. Like most boys, I was raised by a man-hating mother who psychically castrated me at an early age. I have a disjointed middle finger. It was broken when a woman libbers slammed a car door on it. She was outraged when I opened the door for her (something my mother had taught me>) and slammed it on my hand. "I can open my own door," she shouted. There is nothing nice, quiet, perfect or polite about the vast majority of American women. To say that they should be skinny, generous, kind, quiet, honorable and not show their skin is a marvelous idea, but will never happen. Two thirds of American women are over weight and one third are obese. Generous? that has got to be the greatest of all satires. They are so selfish and self-centered; a big boom for plastic surgeons.
The man who is terrified of American women.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Satire of the Century Posted by: henderson
Good Girls
Posted by: ML561 on Sep 14, 2009 4:11 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why do we women sit by passively and accept the image that magazines such as Cosmopolitan, Glamour and other publications throw at us month after month, and worse yet, buy the crap?

Sex, beauty, weight loss. Sex, beauty, weight loss, ad infinitum. And the same Stepford wife, six-foot tall, 100 pound, long-haired blonde on the cover every single time. Since when have we seen an actual average woman on the cover of any magazine?

These magazines, which are everywhere, sell lies and make women feel bad about themselves. I suggest boycotting them, telling the publishers why. We need to stop buying into this wierd notion that fashion designers, diet gurus, and sex "experts" have told us what we should be. And another thing: It is OK to be celibate! I have given up sex for reasons known to me and my God, and do not regret it. And food is not sinful. Peace be with all of you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Shall we reward (more) mediocrity?
Posted by: ecogazoo on Sep 14, 2009 4:33 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article asserts that more young women than young men are taking leadership roles. This is considered a good thing. Then the article asserts that the young women with leadership qualities tend to project personal characteristics that "real girls" can't or won't obtain. In the comments section, it's always a short jump to "The Beauty Myth".

Guess what! Not everyone is a leader. It's mostly a matter of temperament, not training. A person can learn to become more assertive, but whether others perceive her as inspirational or irritating is largely due to personal intangibles that can't be gained by disagreeing with others. The same principle, with slightly variable subtleties, applies to men.

Similarly, not everyone is willing to exercise 30+ minutes/day to avoid obesity, even though the solution is often as easy as putting one foot in front of the other.

I bet (liking to put my money where my mouth is) that we have all observed modern young women and men, understandably frustrated with themselves, whose main area of expertise appears to be the defense of their obesity (it is closely related to "free time"), and complaints about how "unfair" it is that qualified, talented, and yes! likeable people actually accomplish and earn more than they do.

I am unmoved. I'm sure there are many who share my notion. And this isn't a "fringe misogynist movement"...it barely has anything to do with sex.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

enjoyed the piece mostly, but have some questions
Posted by: ladyoracle on Sep 14, 2009 7:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author seems certain that there is some authentic uberwoman inside every girl, and I will definitely say that I fit this profile pretty well as a child and also as an adult woman, when it comes to interpersonal relationships. In the graduate seminars I would speak my mind and argue with anyone, but when it comes to friends and my husband or things out in the "real world," I can't express anger, and I literally cannot find the words to use to communicate to my husband when I fail or have some information that will not please him, even when it has nothing to do with me. I've just been trained not to say what people don't want to hear.

But I wonder if there is actually any authentic self in there waiting to get out. Men aren't authentic selves either, if by men you only mean the uber men with those corner offices. My husband is a quiet, hard worker who has a difficult time voicing his opinion in the workplace, too. Yes, girls are taught to be conflicting things, and surely all those messages get jumbled to produce stagnation in at least some of the girls. This good girls path does keep women down in a patriarchal society, you are undoubtedly correct, if for no other reason than the neurosis and anxieties that result so that even if a woman succeeds, she isn't allowed to be proud of it.

I guess I am so entrenched that I really don't see any advantages to risk taking when success isn't inevitable. I would rather not try than to fail. Isn't it worse to know you weren't good enough or talented enough or a big enough bitch or whatever than not to know? The Just DO It slogan, "Second Place is the First Loser" was first marketed to teenage boys. This author is all hung up on the victories that good girls might win if they were less worried about being good, but there would be more failures, too. More disappointed people unable to stand the stench of their mediocrity. I'd rather be a trophy wife personally, but don't worry because I am unable to have children so the cycle stops with me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

That List is Ridiculous...
Posted by: Lily H. on Sep 14, 2009 10:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If that so-called "Good Girl" list is any indicator of how twisted a view this author has toward the state of young womanhood today, we're ALL in trouble here! Being a mother of a grown, but still reaching toward adulthood daughter, I tallied up the traits on both sides of the list and came up with an astounding total.

My lively, vivacious 23-year-old, naturally beautiful, yet well-rounded and intelligent came out as having 24 "Good Girl" traits and only 6 "Bad Girl" ones. This is from a girl who carved out a very independent spirit for herself from an early age, is getting ready to get married, attended college (had to temporarily leave due to medical issues), but has friends and admirers, both old and young.

And how is being "skinny" a "Good Girl" trait? What does "Natural Hair" mean? A little highlighter means one crosses into the realm of "bad girlism"? Odd...
Why have a trait of "Listens" but not "Obeys"?

My independent child had a spate of not obeying when growing up, but was always and still is a good listener.

What is so "Bad Girl" about being artistic? Weren't women in the Victorian era admired for painting bucolic still lifes and children? I don't see "Light Hair" on the "Good Girl" side, so what is "Dark Hair" doing on the "Bad Girl" side? Does "piercings" include simple ear piercings or various other body sites? Oh, and you forgot "Tattoos". And, what about
"Nurturing"? Certainly that would fall under any "Good Girl" list. Personally, I don't think either of these lists does much to help us raise girls to see the best of BOTH areas, and there are traits in BOTH lists which, under the right support and guidance, could help a young girl go far in life.

Bury these stereotypes with all the pink be-ribboned,
brace-wearing images the picture depicts -- please!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It took me a long time
Posted by: teon6 on Sep 20, 2009 4:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It took me a long time to break free from society's mould but maybe the only reason I ever did was because I was never really in it. Back in my day Farah Fawcett was the teen wet dream and my bulkiness and frizzy hair didn't fit the dream at all, at all.

It took years of hard work to transform the bulkiness into muscle (which good girls most emphatically do NOT have) and even more years and the threat of losing my child to driving stepper gossip girl s03e02 subs gossip girl s03e02 subtitles fringe subtitles fringe season 2 seropol5 transform me from a people-pleaser to someone unafraid to speak their mind. Trial by fire and I would not wish that crucible on others.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bad and Good Girl
Posted by: eklawson on Sep 23, 2009 11:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've finally figured out why I make other women so damn nervous.

I'd say I have many of the positive qualities of both the bad and the good girl, but outwardly I'm all bad, can't help it, I was born a brunette and love to dress funny. I've taken a few big risks and I did terribly in high school, great in college.

Unfortunately you can't wear your highly developed ethical sense as a fashion accessory.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement