COMMENTS: 42
Rape Victims Charged Up to $1,200 for Rape Kits
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Reproductive Justice headlines via email.
When a woman is raped, police turn to scientific evidence-semen, blood and tissue samples-to identify her attacker. The evidence is collected through a medical exam of the victim, who is not supposed to pay for this crime-solving process.
But 15 years after Congress passed a law to ensure that rape victims would never see a bill, loopholes and bureaucratic tangles still leave some victims paying for hospital expenses and exams, which can cost up to $1,200.
Congress requires state or local authorities to cover these costs, but the state legislatures that regulate the process offer piecemeal guarantees of Congress’ mandate, the Huffington Post Investigative Fund and ProPublica found. Some states allow hospitals to bill the victim’s insurer. Confusion in California and other states allows police to occasionally ignore Congress’ rules and require victims to cooperate with an investigation before exam costs are covered. Lax enforcement of the law, victims’ advocates say, also means some hospitals in Illinois bill victims directly.
Congress created the Violence Against Women Act to protect victims and encourage them to report rapes. The law known as VAWA has forced many states to crack down on billing problems.
But ambiguities in the law still allow a remarkable disparity in the legal system: Some rape victims, unlike victims of other crimes, have to pay for basic evidence collection.
"We never ask a robbery victim to pay for the cost of fingerprints," said Sarah Tofte, a researcher with Human Rights Watch, which has been tracking how states comply with VAWA.
As a victim recovers from her assault, the last thing she needs is a bill for her exam, said Katherine Hull, a spokeswoman for the Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network.
After all, she said, "Rape is not something you can budget for".
Despite billing concerns, Hull and other advocates encourage victims to get a forensic exam. Many emergency rooms have specially trained nurses who swab, scan and photograph victims’ bodies, hunting for evidence.
Yet states vary in how proficiently they process the evidence and medical bills that follow. As we previously reported, even if the state pays for an exam, there is no guarantee the evidence will be tested. There are more than 350,000 untested DNA samples backlogged in police departments and crime labs nationwide, according to federal statistics.
Kellie Greene, a rape victim who battled collection agencies in the 1990s because she refused to pay for her exam, is disappointed that victims still find themselves saddled with hospital bills and testing delays. "It’s a frightening thought," said Greene, who runs the advocacy group Speaking Out About Rape.
An opportunity to strengthen VAWA will come soon because Congress must reauthorize the law before it expires in 2011. In a statement, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), the Judiciary Committee’s chairman, said Congress "will need to carefully consider what can be done to improve and strengthen the Act."
Revisions to VAWA, Leahy’s statement said, "should include providing every possible assistance to victims, regardless of where they live."
It’s unclear whether Republicans on the Judiciary Committee would support VAWA reform. A spokesman for Sen. Jeff Sessions, the committee’s ranking Republican, did not return calls or e-mails requesting comment.
ENFORCING THE LAW
Some states and police departments have a history of skirting their responsibility to pay for forensic exams, we found in an analysis of state statutes and from interviews with policymakers and victims’ advocates.
Last year’s presidential race exposed the shortcomings.
During the campaign, it came to light that until 2000, police in some Alaska towns charged rape victims or their insurance companies up to $1,200 for forensic exams - including the town of Wasilla where vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin was mayor from 1996 to 2002.
Justice Department officials also have found that, until recently, some states refused to pay for a rape victim’s exam unless she agreed to file a police report, which some victims are reluctant to do immediately after the attack.
Stay up to date with the latest Reproductive Justice headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Blacktiger1 on Aug 11, 2009 2:06 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Blacktiger
Posted by: losingmyliberties
» RE: Blacktiger
Posted by: TheNamelessCity
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Andrew_S on Aug 11, 2009 2:40 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» What...
Posted by: AlexaD
» RE: What...
Posted by: John Annis
» RE: What...
Posted by: Andrew_S
» RE: What...
Posted by: Curio
» RE: What...
Posted by: Andrew_S
» RE: What...
Posted by: Curio
» RE: What...
Posted by: Andrew_S
» RE: What...
Posted by: Curio
» RE: What...
Posted by: Andrew_S
» RE: What...
Posted by: Curio
» RE: What...continued
Posted by: Curio
» RE: What...
Posted by: Andrew_S
» RE: What...
Posted by: Andrew_S
» RE: What...
Posted by: Curio
» RE: What...continued
Posted by: Curio
» RE: What...continued
Posted by: Andrew_S
» Yes, I am still here, somehow
Posted by: Curio
» RE: Yes, I am still here, somehow (continued)
Posted by: Curio
» RE: What...
Posted by: paulaH
» RE: Statistics please
Posted by: Quicksilver
» RE: Statistics please
Posted by: sweetannabelle
» RE: Statistics please
Posted by: Andrew_S
» RE: Statistics please
Posted by: talkville
» RE: Statistics please
Posted by: Andrew_S
» ANDREW, DARLING...
Posted by: Steven Wanzell
» RE: ANDREW, DARLING...
Posted by: Andrew_S
Comments are closed-
Posted by: thekidde on Aug 11, 2009 5:16 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Exactly what I was thinking. :)
Posted by: kateco2
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on Aug 11, 2009 5:22 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a man and STILL matter to most.
I was sent by the VA to have an x-ray.
They made an appt for me at the local hospital here in WI, one I call Expirus.
This hospital attempted to bill BOTH the VA and me.
I called the VA and had to follow up to get this rip off deleted.
Hospitals are NOT to be trusted.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Just like universities, they're FOR PROFIT CORPORATIONS masquerading as charitable organizations.
Posted by: Steven Wanzell
Comments are closed-
Posted by: evilgrin on Aug 11, 2009 7:29 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Women are charged for their rape kits because they are held to blame, held responsible, for their rapes. What other conclusion is there?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bitter_Boy on Aug 11, 2009 8:27 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even if the Supreme Court overturns Row v Wade, abortion will still be legal if it involves rape or incest, or the lovely combination of incestuous rape. So it stands to reason that if you make identifying a rapist very difficult, and discourage women from even reporting a rape, then they can't be allowed to have a legal abortion. Case closed, baby saved, Jesus gets a stiffy.
Makes you wanna rape a Pro-lifer, doesn't it?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Steppin Razor on Aug 11, 2009 9:51 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Hiroak on Aug 11, 2009 11:36 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How else can rich black men like O.J. get away with murder? He should have killed a poor woman and it wouldn't even have gone to court. Do you think the state paid for all those special tests? The rich rule "IN THIS COUNTRY" get over it!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Poster child for mental health care?
Posted by: Steven Wanzell
Comments are closed-
Posted by: talkville on Aug 11, 2009 12:12 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rape's like that.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bambi on Aug 11, 2009 5:59 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: neko_sake on Aug 11, 2009 9:34 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Blacktiger1 on Aug 11, 2009 2:06 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Blacktiger
Posted by: losingmyliberties
» RE: Blacktiger
Posted by: TheNamelessCity
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Andrew_S on Aug 11, 2009 2:40 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» What...
Posted by: AlexaD
» RE: What...
Posted by: John Annis
» RE: What...
Posted by: Andrew_S
» RE: What...
Posted by: Curio
» RE: What...
Posted by: Andrew_S
» RE: What...
Posted by: Curio
» RE: What...
Posted by: Andrew_S
» RE: What...
Posted by: Curio
» RE: What...
Posted by: Andrew_S
» RE: What...
Posted by: Curio
» RE: What...continued
Posted by: Curio
» RE: What...
Posted by: Andrew_S
» RE: What...
Posted by: Andrew_S
» RE: What...
Posted by: Curio
» RE: What...continued
Posted by: Curio
» RE: What...continued
Posted by: Andrew_S
» Yes, I am still here, somehow
Posted by: Curio
» RE: Yes, I am still here, somehow (continued)
Posted by: Curio
» RE: What...
Posted by: paulaH
» RE: Statistics please
Posted by: Quicksilver
» RE: Statistics please
Posted by: sweetannabelle
» RE: Statistics please
Posted by: Andrew_S
» RE: Statistics please
Posted by: talkville
» RE: Statistics please
Posted by: Andrew_S
» ANDREW, DARLING...
Posted by: Steven Wanzell
» RE: ANDREW, DARLING...
Posted by: Andrew_S
Comments are closed-
Posted by: thekidde on Aug 11, 2009 5:16 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Exactly what I was thinking. :)
Posted by: kateco2
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on Aug 11, 2009 5:22 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a man and STILL matter to most.
I was sent by the VA to have an x-ray.
They made an appt for me at the local hospital here in WI, one I call Expirus.
This hospital attempted to bill BOTH the VA and me.
I called the VA and had to follow up to get this rip off deleted.
Hospitals are NOT to be trusted.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Just like universities, they're FOR PROFIT CORPORATIONS masquerading as charitable organizations.
Posted by: Steven Wanzell
Comments are closed-
Posted by: evilgrin on Aug 11, 2009 7:29 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Women are charged for their rape kits because they are held to blame, held responsible, for their rapes. What other conclusion is there?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bitter_Boy on Aug 11, 2009 8:27 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even if the Supreme Court overturns Row v Wade, abortion will still be legal if it involves rape or incest, or the lovely combination of incestuous rape. So it stands to reason that if you make identifying a rapist very difficult, and discourage women from even reporting a rape, then they can't be allowed to have a legal abortion. Case closed, baby saved, Jesus gets a stiffy.
Makes you wanna rape a Pro-lifer, doesn't it?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Steppin Razor on Aug 11, 2009 9:51 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Hiroak on Aug 11, 2009 11:36 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How else can rich black men like O.J. get away with murder? He should have killed a poor woman and it wouldn't even have gone to court. Do you think the state paid for all those special tests? The rich rule "IN THIS COUNTRY" get over it!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Poster child for mental health care?
Posted by: Steven Wanzell
Comments are closed-
Posted by: talkville on Aug 11, 2009 12:12 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rape's like that.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bambi on Aug 11, 2009 5:59 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: neko_sake on Aug 11, 2009 9:34 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Updated: Catholic Bishops Embrace Anti-Abortion Terrorizers Missy Smith and Randall Terry
10 Defining Feminist Moments of 2009
Going Undercover in the Crazy, Tragic World of Christian Gay-Conversion Therapy




