COMMENTS: 326
My First Abortion Party
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Reproductive Justice headlines via email.
"Have you guys heard the news?" Maggie (name changed) unwrapped the scarf from around her neck and patted her flat belly. "Preggers." It was around 30 degrees outside, and her cheeks were splashed pink from the Indiana wind.
She had discovered earlier that week, after missing a period and taking the test. "I kind of knew already. My boobs and my lower back have been killing me for a while." She shrugged.
My girlfriend Ali and I exchanged a surprised look. Our forks, dotted with pasta sauce, dangled identically, flaccidly, in our hands. She was quicker than me to gain her composure, and turned to address her best friend.
"What are you going to do?" Unnecessary question, really -- a conversational life vest, used when you’re sputtering for something to say. We knew the answer. Maggie, a 22-year-old college senior with no intention of bringing a child into the world yet, was going to have an abortion. She told us that she had already made up her mind; she had even determined the time, date and location. A better question might have been, "How are you going to pay for it?"
She answered that one before we had a chance to ask. "We’re having a party Friday to raise money," Maggie said. "You guys are obviously invited."
An abortion party. For the price of whatever we were willing to donate, she explained, we could partake of baked goods, beer and dancing. It was going to start at 10 p.m. at Maggie’s.
The Facebook invite came a day later, and it was settled. Ali and I were going to scrape together what donation money we could and join in the festivities.
Before continuing, I should make it clear that I’m no stranger to bizarre, pregnancy-related parties. My junior year of college, I attended a "Welcoming the Baby Kegger" designed to provide love, support and slurred confessions to a friend nearing her delivery date (she drank grape juice). Though I had initially been skeptical, I left this soirée du bébé pleasantly surprised. Everyone had brought gifts, toys, wine and food, which they piled atop a table in her living room. The music was low, and the conversation was great -- an all-around classy affair. I imagined the abortion party might be similar to this: a way to help out a friend who’s made a difficult decision. I was both right and wrong.
Ali and I arrived around 11, only half aware of the irony of being "late" to an abortion party. Walking in, we were bludgeoned with a blast of hot air, followed by the tangy stink of dance floor revelry. Someone had taken a red bed sheet and hung it below a light fixture to resemble a giant womb. Every so often, a dancer’s head or arm or dreadlock would brush against one of its smooth folds, creating a rippling effect. "Let’s Go Crazy" by Prince was playing.
As Ali went off to find Maggie, I sat down and struck up a conversation with Andrew (name changed), the three-year-old son of one of the partygoers. When Andrew and I first met months before, I learned that he’s a very precocious boy when it comes to animals and plants. His father has spent a lot of time teaching him about birdcalls and edible nuts, and he’s always spouting out little nuggets of useful knowledge. Tonight, he had the remnants of some apple-flavored dessert smeared on his mouth and owl pajamas.
Even though I thought the presence of a young child at an abortion party was a little bizarre, nobody else seemed to acknowledge (or care about) this contradiction. Instead, the rest of the guests just took turns fawning over him, exchanging high fives and swooshing him through the air. He, along with everyone else, was having a blast.
"Do you feel welcome here?" I eventually asked him, fully expecting a ‘grown-up’-type answer. He glanced around, chewed on his sleeve and went to look for some babes to hang out with. "Too cool for me," I thought, shaking my head and cramming a pastry into my mouth. I was bewildered.
I continued mingling, sampling pastries and chatting with some of Ali’s friends. I didn’t really feel comfortable discussing the abortion with strangers, so I just talked bullshit: Music. School. The Future. I guess I was hesitant to confront the breadth of the party’s complexity. Maybe I had even hoped to avoid it.
Stay up to date with the latest Reproductive Justice headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bobson on Jul 7, 2009 1:41 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Should such a decisions not be carried out with the utmost seriousness and respect to the life that is about to be extinguished?
"Not about to" have a baby because she is 22 and just doesn't want to ruin her fun time is why the pro choice movement has so much trouble. This is abusing that right to choose, and the party, and the other girls wanting to exclude and resenting the boyfriend, this is some seriously cold shit and it offers a new glimpse into the downright darkness that resides in the female soul. This is some stone age pagan shit right here, can't believe it is happening in 2009!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I don't know, I think pro-choice ought to recognize reality
Posted by: jparsons
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: astudent
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: drmflorida
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: Phe
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: daved
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption MANY FOSTER KIDS ARE TOO UP FOR ADOPTION
Posted by: maribelle
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: punkrockhoneymama
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: drmflorida
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: mjglow
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: TNT666
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: daved
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: babs
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: mjglow
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: mjglow
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: dcande01
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: pddpop
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: BobbieT
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: TNT666
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: Phe
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: mjglow
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: BobbieT
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: sakul72
» i don't want your daughter
Posted by: goatini
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: TNT666
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: sakul72
» "I thought conservative woman were the cold, heartless ones."
Posted by: goatini
» RE: "I thought conservative woman were the cold, heartless ones."
Posted by: sakul72
» sorry but i'm not a skank
Posted by: goatini
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption BIRTH CONTROL DOESN"T ALWAYS WORK
Posted by: maribelle
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption BIRTH CONTROL DOESN"T ALWAYS WORK
Posted by: sakul72
» "birth control that is 100% effective is abstinence"
Posted by: goatini
» RE: "birth control that is 100% effective is abstinence"
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: pddpop
» RE: this was weird
Posted by: khaleesi
» RE: this was weird
Posted by: dmaciewski
» RE: this was weird
Posted by: BobbieT
» RE: this was weird
Posted by: sakul72
» and you would know HOW?
Posted by: goatini
» RE: this was weird
Posted by: FbO Vorcha
» RE: this was weird
Posted by: Cory.Goodman
» RE: this was weird
Posted by: maglindracia
» RE: this was weird
Posted by: Cory.Goodman
» RE: this was weird
Posted by: babs
» RE: this was weird
Posted by: Cat37
» I kind of agree
Posted by: Robba29
» RE: this was weird
Posted by: caritasinveritate
» Wow
Posted by: magoo65293
» Having kids is Stone-age Christian Shit
Posted by: moyshekapoyre
» RE: Having kids is Stone-age Christian Shit
Posted by: sakul72
» OBAMA SCAMS POPE 2X
Posted by: reelman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TNT666 on Jul 7, 2009 2:04 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am very heart warmed that a young lady feels this comfortable with her peer group and her decision.
As for the guy, he is completely irrelevant to the decision-making process. But since his body was 50% responsible for the problem, it would be compassionate of him to contribute financially.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: MilesGregarius
» I agree
Posted by: tymefornew
» RE: I agree
Posted by: TNT666
» RE: I agree
Posted by: MilesGregarius
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: uncertain
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: TNT666
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: bloominblacksheep
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: TNT666
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: hopenosis
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: TNT666
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: FbO Vorcha
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: MT512
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: dcande01
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: TNT666
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: dcande01
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: jackpagan
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: babs
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: kennybent
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: kennybent
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: Beadmaster
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: kennybent
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: TNT666
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: kennybent
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: St. Luke
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: Beadmaster
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: kennybent
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: caritasinveritate
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: kennybent
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: Tombo
» Ladies? Poor choice of noun on so many levels.
Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: sicdoggy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sfortuna on Jul 7, 2009 3:17 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Other popular games could be pin the bloody coathanger on the politician, and the downstairs belly slide race, where pregnant gals can race to the bottom of the stairs face first in an attempt to dislodge the parasite growing inside her. Men, of course, are excluded from all games except Penis Pinata, where blindfolded women take swings at the guys testicles with a cricket bat until the offending organs are ground to a fine paste, suitable for a cracker spread.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Post abortion party - refreshments
Posted by: Rungle
» RE: Post abortion party
Posted by: Cory.Goodman
» Even though you speak in jest . . .
Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: ven though you speak in jest . . .
Posted by: dmaciewski
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kittybrat on Jul 7, 2009 3:18 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do feel sorry for the male involved. After all, they are a couple, they made the decision together and he is there to emotionally support her.
Too bad for the cold shoulder.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jasonix on Jul 7, 2009 6:29 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Is this like some weird extrovert thing?
Posted by: tlCampbell
» RE: Is this like some weird extrovert thing?
Posted by: bcgirl125
» RE: Is this like some weird extrovert thing?
Posted by: babs
» It's more than weird!
Posted by: countingdaisies
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rastaman on Jul 7, 2009 6:38 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this is precisely the idiots that we defend against Repuglicans saying that pro choice are "pro abortion"....and then another one of these brain dead ditzes proves it to them.
women in this country are childish and stoooooopid......and had better grow up....and fast.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: SICK SICK SICK
Posted by: maglindracia
» RE: SICK SICK SICK
Posted by: Sympa
» RE: SICK SICK SICK
Posted by: TNT666
» RE: SICK SICK SICK
Posted by: babs
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Jul 7, 2009 7:34 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I see cheapening human life has reached a new low. You have made
Posted by: TNT666
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Karina on Jul 7, 2009 7:49 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maggie's choice, Maggie's responsibility.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Odd
Posted by: TheExpatriate
» RE: Odd
Posted by: Karina
Comments are closed-
Posted by: clvngodess on Jul 7, 2009 7:52 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I'm not buying this story at all. - It is a bit strange
Posted by: DanoM
» RE: I'm not buying this story at all. me neither
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: I'm not buying this story at all. me neither
Posted by: samd11
» RE: I'm not buying this story at all.
Posted by: MotherLodeBeth
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Human Being on Jul 7, 2009 8:09 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Abortion is the Achilles heel of us progressives. We rightly agitate about war, poverty, cruelty against animals, ecological destruction, etc. But when it comes to sentient pre-birth humans, we're supposed to chuck all compassion and start prattling about "rights." This is hypocrisy of the absolute worst sort.
I can understand and respect Maggie's (and her boyfriend's) desire not to have their life plans interrupted by parenthood at this time. So the smart thing to do would be to contact an adoption agency now, rather than an abortion clinic, and give the child a chance to live a full life. Isn't that what we progressives claim we want for ALL people?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: kateco2
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: sakul72
» I would consider that "responsibility".
Posted by: kateco2
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: xtine
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: punkrockhoneymama
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: bmmg39
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption... ONLY when there's no option
Posted by: DaBear
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: MT512
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: xtine
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: bmmg39
» Hey! You'll never guess what I found!
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Hey! You'll never guess what I found!
Posted by: bmmg39
» RE: Hey! You'll never guess what I found!
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Hey! You'll never guess what I found!
Posted by: bmmg39
» RE: Hey! You'll never guess what I found!
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption - FAIL
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption - FAIL
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption - FAIL
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption - FAIL
Posted by: sakul72
» NEWBORNS ARE NOT SENTIENT BEINGS
Posted by: Phe
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: MT512
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: mjglow
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: Quannah
» sapience is what makes us human
Posted by: mjglow
» "sentient" does not mean "conscious".
Posted by: goatini
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: TNT666
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: bmmg39
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: TNT666
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: bmmg39
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: punkrockhoneymama
» Not this progressive
Posted by: sunspot
» No, you don't have to prattle about "rights."
Posted by: morticia
» RE: No, you don't have to prattle about "rights."
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: lostvirtue
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jul 7, 2009 8:09 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A FEAST FOR THE PRO-LIFERS !! Um, isn't everything their feast?
Posted by: DaBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Morganx on Jul 7, 2009 8:53 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Bu Bye Alternet Thanks for noticing
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Bu Bye Alternet Thanks for noticing
Posted by: babs
» you're right
Posted by: alizard
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Comrade Rutherford on Jul 7, 2009 9:00 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I knew that ultimately the final decision was hers alone, but she was very keen on my input and my feelings. We made the decision together. I went with her to the clinic and waited for her and then took her home and took care of her while she recovered. Never once did we regret our decision to excise a clump of cells.
As to the story, I don't see anything wrong at all with having a fundraising party. No one is going to come to a fundraising wake. And an 8 week old fetus is NOT a baby!
Now that I am older and my wife and I have kids, I will tell you all that we had two full term stillbirths. Just because you decide not to abort your fetus is NO guarantee that you'll actually have a living baby! Babies die quite often actually for no reason science can find. I simply can't get all self-righteous about aborting fetuses. So get off your high horses and stop reveling in how other people make important decisions about their lives.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» AMEN!!!!!
Posted by: sunspot
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Jul 7, 2009 9:06 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The whole thing seemed perfectly fine to me, creative, responsible, and yeah, the questions raised by the author are pretty damned relevant, even if most 'Merkaaners can't handle grownup discourse yet. (Note how many anti-choice trolls and faux progs cropped up in the comments)
As to the whole "male" thing... I'm still amazed that aggression is the end-all definition of masculinity or "male" and female is rational reasonable and cooperative. I guess sexism is ALWAYS reactionary.
Also the whole notion that males are blankly unaffected by reproduction and reproductive choices, other than financial or as an emotionally supporting role, seems pretty demeaning and irresponsible if not wholly immature and non-functional. The author of the piece stated his own positionality quite well, but in the comments some people got really lost about the BF and the scope of his involvement.
While I would not pretend to speak for all males, as a male, I don't feel ambivalent or distant with respect to my own reproductive potential, actualized or terminated. I have a real problem with progeny in my absence. Every child I've co-created in this life was deliberately chosen and chosen with my being a Dad in mind, connected with co-creator female partner or not. The snip ultimately was the only way to ensure I controlled my own reproductivity. I'm grateful my co-creator female partner still wants me around... and that's a part of the scary vulnerable part of the male experience in reproduction NO ONE talks about (or apparently wants to, we're just thugs afterall). That kid is a part of me and not a part of me... that's pretty damned important. When we weren't ready or we couldn't afford to, we didn't follow the parental path to its fruition. Thankfully we had the safe legal choice technology and hard won civil rights affords most of us. But Men are much more than sperm donors and wallets, we are whole human people too, and we males do have to recognize there are limits since the lionshare of the heavy lifting initially ain't gonna be us for nine months. Sounds to me like Maggie's got a keeper in her BF and her friends who dissed on the guy need to grow up some more.
Men have a LOT more work to do on each other.... time to move past the aggression definition and the financial boundary limit if we're going to be partners. For me the mono-dimensional-male model was one of the unanswered questions that leaves me feeling so bleak...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sureshot45 on Jul 7, 2009 9:32 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
im pro choice, but this is the reason the repubs have so much ammo. this is the stupidest thing i have read in a really long time..and i visit alternet frequently..which says a lot.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: never
Posted by: MT512
» RE: never? Really?
Posted by: DaBear
» Oh yeah, about Repubs and ammo....
Posted by: DaBear
» RE: Oh yeah, about Repubs and ammo....
Posted by: sureshot45
» RE: never
Posted by: maglindracia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maddy on Jul 7, 2009 10:30 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nor do I understand why it's the "compassionate" decision for any person to remain silent out of some wouldbe political deference to the "oppressed." I used to hear this crap all of the time from liberal whites in college classes about race and racism--that they were obligated to remain silent and obedient to the students of color in the room as some kind of anti-racist solidarity. I'd even have white students write in their papers that they couldn't engage a black writer on principle because they couldn't, as a white person, understand said person's experience. My favorite example was when I was leading an impromptu conversation about racism on campus and a white student interrupted us and, angrily, said that we "needed to stop talking because we should not discuss race without a person of color present."
I thought then, and do now, that such a position was nothing but rank cowardice and a skewed brand of leftist politics. It's a basic disrepect to refuse to engage with someone on the grounds that you're somehow honoring them as you do so--it's condescending, patronizing, and fundamentally dishonest.
So, to start, don't give me this crap that "good" (i.e. feminist-leaning) men cannot participate in the abortion debate. Of course you can. If your male friend was hurting at the thought of losing his child, he has a right to that pain, and he also has a right to expect your support. Supporting him doesn't change your position on abortion rights. Challenging these girls on their behavior shouldn't either.
This shouldn't be surprising, but there are folks on the left who can be rigidly dogmatic--even bullying--about their politics. I tend to understand it as a youth thing--a kind of fierce protection resulting from the person feeling that they're under seige all of the time. But, I'm sorry, it's fine to say that you're prochoice but unwilling to watch an innocent person be vilified. It's also fine to say that, at a minimum, that the "open celebration" of a friend's abortion as described herein is tacky and immature, and does nothing to advance pro-choice politics or a feminism that includes men.
This kind of "I can't say what I really feel because I'm privileged" is EXACTLY why the right thinks liberals are weak and pathetic. Integrity should not be set in opposition to loyalty. Period.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Very well said
Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» RE: Very well said
Posted by: humblesound
» RE: Very well said
Posted by: Illiteratilumen
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sakul72 on Jul 7, 2009 10:34 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Selfishness on Display!
Posted by: babs
» RE: Selfishness on Display!
Posted by: sakul72
» BIRTH CONTROL IS NOT FOOLPROOF!
Posted by: sunspot
» RE: BIRTH CONTROL IS NOT FOOLPROOF!
Posted by: MT512
» RE: Selfishness on Display!
Posted by: humblesound
» RE: Selfishness on Display!
Posted by: TheExpatriate
» RE: Selfishness on Display!
Posted by: sakul72
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Honky the Nihilist X on Jul 7, 2009 7:45 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Men are slaves, a violation of the 13th amendment, to a bastard kid.
Men are not provided equal protection under the law as guaranteed by the 14th amendment.
Women will tell a man that wants to abort his responsibility to a child, “Responsibility”, “Too bad”, “shoulda used protection”, “innocent little baby”. We’ll bitches, ditto.
P.S. I’d love meet chicks at an abortion party.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Malou on Jul 7, 2009 10:38 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Agreed
Posted by: soleta_nf
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Quannah on Jul 7, 2009 11:18 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People are awfully judgemental here today!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: morticia on Jul 7, 2009 11:59 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» 1-rater:
Posted by: morticia
» RE: 1-rater:
Posted by: morticia
» RE: 1-rater:
Posted by: morticia
» RE: 1-rater:
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: 1-rater:
Posted by: morticia
» RE: 1-rater:
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: 1-rater:
Posted by: sakul72
» Try me!
Posted by: morticia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bkochandco on Jul 7, 2009 12:09 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» THANK YOU!!! And here I thought it was "just me".
Posted by: kwfryatl
» RE: What the h*ll is a three-year-old doing at a party at 11pm?!
Posted by: MatthewSavage
» RE: What the h*ll is a three-year-old doing at a party at 11pm?!
Posted by: MT512
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ellie on Jul 7, 2009 3:03 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
can we please have some real, adult, mature, thought provoking content for a change???
ps... did anyone think to checks the 'facts' in this story??? is it made up of bull, a straw man scenario or heading towards another battle over vegetarianism which is beyond boring...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lilly on Jul 7, 2009 4:00 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ladyoracle on Jul 7, 2009 8:10 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would absolutely attend a party raising money for an abortion, and I see nothing anti-feminist about it, except the way the guy was treated, unless there's backstory missing.
However, I am concerned about the 3-yr old at a party so late at night. The author as well as the other people at the party seem too irresponsible, self-absorbed, and flaky to have intelligent ideas about what "choice" really means. It's clear that Maggie wasn't ready for motherhood, and that's fine, but I wonder if once the undergraduate high wears off a lot of the people who were at the party will rethink how they acted that night and what it really meant. It seems like it ended up meaning nothing. That is sad.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: humblesound on Jul 8, 2009 1:48 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are people here who are vehemently opposed to this party happening. They frown completely on the actions of that woman and would love to shame her for it. Okay...
But why are you shaming Alternet for this article? A narrative thing that someone wrote explaining their experience attending and being a part of something they were both taken aback by and had never seen before.
How is that sort of personal diary style journalism the thing that needs to be burned to the fucking ground on your witch hunt?
This article's fine.
Now the nonstop articles telling us we need to stop eating meat based on what our teeth look like? Those could go.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Lot of misguided rage in the comments section today...
Posted by: WebShaman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jayteapee on Jul 8, 2009 8:42 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Old Skeptic on Jul 8, 2009 9:23 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is interesting that the loudest voices in the anti-choice crowd always seem to belong to men, who by grace of a fortunate "Y" chromosome are forever protected from having to make this decision for their own bodies. I strongly suspect that if men could get pregnant, abortion would be a total non-issue and birth control would be a sacrament.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why not adoption? some ask
Posted by: daved
» RE: Why not adoption? some ask
Posted by: Phe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: enough already.... on Jul 8, 2009 11:10 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interestingly, recent polls indicate that being pro-abortion (which was in a pretty much a satistical dead-heat with being pro-life) has recently declined U.S. wide. For the first time in a few decades, the U.S. is pretty firmly pro-life.
These are facts, not opinions. Flame all you want, but that's what it is.
Now a question.... could it be that being pro-choice only serves to further victimize women? It seems young men in national polls certainly think its a good thing to have responsibility-free sex, and it seems that women think differently.
Now another question.... can anyone give a good answer on why a fetus (whatever stage) is not a human. Just saying its a clump of cells, or that it doesn't look like a human are not answers. Those are called conclusory assertions, without any basis other than one's own knee jerk opinion. I'd like to see a truly reasoned opinion on the matter. Note that I like Paglia's answer to the question a great deal... that abortion is killing a human, but that she's still pro-choice. At least that's intellectually honest.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Ironic post from Old Skeptic
Posted by: Old Skeptic
» RE: Ironic post from Old Skeptic
Posted by: TNT666
» RE: Ironic post from Old Skeptic
Posted by: daved
» RE: Ironic post from Old Skeptic
Posted by: photon's feather
» and that altar servers
Posted by: goatini
» RE: Ironic post from Old Skeptic
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Ironic post from Old Skeptic
Posted by: Cytocop
» RE: Ironic post from Old Skeptic
Posted by: Phe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ML561 on Jul 8, 2009 2:40 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It takes TWO to create a baby. Women don't get pregnant all by their lonesome. Men need to be taught some sort of sexual responsibility as well. It is simply not true that boys can't keep it in their pants, and that it is the woman who bears the burden should things get out of hand. I feel the abortion party was in bad taste as were many of the comments regarding it, including some of the profanity..let's keep it clean, please, and try to have some intelligent and thoughtful discourse.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ML561
Posted by: maglindracia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fosterdad on Jul 8, 2009 4:26 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a shame.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: What a shame
Posted by: faerietails
» RE: What a shame
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: What a shame
Posted by: MilesGregarius
» RE: What a shame
Posted by: sakul72
» picky picky picky
Posted by: goatini
» RE: What a shame
Posted by: fosterdad
» so what?
Posted by: goatini
» no one is obligated
Posted by: goatini
» RE: no one is obligated
Posted by: fosterdad
» YES, it is wrong.
Posted by: goatini
» RE: YES, it is wrong.
Posted by: fosterdad
» yeah, it's SO bad to abhor people
Posted by: goatini
» PS, a FETUS is not a CHILD
Posted by: goatini
» fetuses are not children
Posted by: mcubed
» RE: fetuses are not children
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: no one is obligated
Posted by: Phe
» RE: no one is obligated
Posted by: fosterdad
» so you think you are entitled to some kind of prize?
Posted by: goatini
» RE: so you think you are entitled to some kind of prize?
Posted by: sakul72
» "you are all pretty flexible in the mattress department"
Posted by: goatini
» RE: "you are all pretty flexible in the mattress department"
Posted by: sakul72
» what i meant is that men like you
Posted by: goatini
» RE: no one is obligated
Posted by: Quannah
» thank you Q, my friend,
Posted by: goatini
» I never said anyone is obligated
Posted by: fosterdad
» what a steaming pile of sanctimonious dookie
Posted by: goatini
» RE: what a steaming pile of sanctimonious dookie
Posted by: sakul72
» when i see posts that contain the language "keep your legs together"
Posted by: goatini
» RE: when i see posts that contain the language "keep your legs together"
Posted by: sakul72
» "Stop cutting people down that don't agree with you"
Posted by: goatini
» How Biased Adoption Language Tears Families Apart
Posted by: goatini
» Adoption Ethics - An Oxymoron
Posted by: goatini
» Adoption: The Damage to Children
Posted by: goatini
» RE: Adoption: The Damage to Children
Posted by: Phe
» Breaking the Silence: On Living "Pro-Lifers'" Choice for Women
Posted by: goatini
» Bullseye, goatini...
Posted by: morticia
» not my piece, mort,
Posted by: goatini
» RE: Breaking the Silence: On Living "Pro-Lifers'" Choice for Women
Posted by: sakul72
» "I have 2 kids now"
Posted by: goatini
» NOW all can see who is the black heart
Posted by: goatini
» RE: NOW all can see who is the black heart
Posted by: sakul72
» yeah, i would hate to see
Posted by: goatini
» Maggie and her boyfriend agreed on abortion
Posted by: mcubed
» RE: What a shame
Posted by: TNT666
» well, of course,
Posted by: goatini
» RE: What a shame
Posted by: login@bugmenot.com
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sakul72 on Jul 9, 2009 5:45 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seems that is a rare thing with liberal women these days... It is extremely unattractive to a man looking for a mate, but hell yeah if you are just looking for a good time...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Is there at least one Liberal woman that knows what responsibility means?
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Is there at least one Liberal woman that knows what responsibility means?
Posted by: morticia
» Yo! sakul72! Question for you!
Posted by: morticia
» Glad to see...
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Glad to see...
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Glad to see...
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Glad to see...
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: Glad to see...
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Glad to see...
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: Yo! sakul72! Question for you!
Posted by: sakul72
» I asked you if....
Posted by: morticia
» Responsibility for children
Posted by: mcubed
» RE: esponsibility for children
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: esponsibility for children
Posted by: Phe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: login@bugmenot.com on Jul 9, 2009 7:50 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Hillymeg on Jul 9, 2009 2:19 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
bit.ly/15Ht7j
Hope you'll comment too!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I wouldn't try the punch, that's for sure
Posted by: TheExpatriate
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Robba29 on Jul 9, 2009 10:44 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Did this get posted...
Posted by: daved
» FETUS is not a BABY
Posted by: goatini
» RE: FETUS is A LIFE - corrected for you
Posted by: sakul72
» "your anology (sic) is worthless"
Posted by: goatini
Comments are closed-
Posted by: daved on Jul 10, 2009 10:27 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You may be almost out of your shoes.....
Posted by: morticia
» have you heard of "Rent Parties"?
Posted by: mcubed
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kmby06 on Jul 11, 2009 9:44 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fact that her partner was willing to support her in the decision should NEVER be miscounted. So many women go through abortions in silence, with a fear of stigma and rejection. Had my partner been there for me emotionally, I would have handled the situation much better, and wouldn't have gone through multiple levels of depression afterwards. This woman's 'friends' are arrogant and misguided clowns that are the reason women get viewed in a harsh light as far as our rights to our bodies are concerned. No one but the woman in question has the right to say who is 'supposed' to be a pillar of support through a trying time, and furthermore assuming he should be pony-ing up the money for the abortion seems to contradict the idea of the woman managing everything, decision and procedure on her own.
To anyone with a more modest view on abortion or looking for reasons to stand against a pro-choice lifestyle, please don't take this superficial article as the standard for modern women and our right to choose. Some people just want to make a shock statement.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: At what point do we get real about our 'roles' in abortion?
Posted by: morticia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AZLBRAX07 on Jul 11, 2009 2:00 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"These were liberal people, after all… I couldn’t help but notice how aggressive…their attitudes became when confronted with the issue of a woman’s right to choose. It was almost as if, in the process of upholding an ideal of openness and acceptance, they had fallen victim to the same forces they were trying to critique."
I have noticed how hypocritical, vitriolic, downright fanatical and narrow-minded many of the people who respond to the articles on 'Alternet.org' tend to be...at least, when one offers a reasonable opinion that isn't in lock-step with The Party Line. Then again, 'Alternet.org' is equally hypocritical in the way certain responses are "censored"…even though those responses don't stray from the guidelines we, all, agreed to.
It would appear that the New Left is nothing but the reverse side of the same smarmy coin the Neocons are on!
FYI: I am pro-choice in ALL things, not just a woman's right to choose!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I don't understand your comment
Posted by: mcubed
» RE: I don't understand your comment
Posted by: AZLBRAX07
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ms_happy on Jul 13, 2009 3:07 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Isn't it better.....
Posted by: sakul72
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LEB on Jul 14, 2009 7:53 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sakul72 on Jul 14, 2009 8:39 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The question could be:
did you honestly attempt birth control, and the condom broke, or whatever.. the bc failed..
or
is it a provable fact that this baby will be better of DEAD in a garbage can than living, breathing etc..
and/or
you can prove that you are a responsible person, that this was a grave mistake and not just an easy way to get out of irresponsible and selfish behavior.
and/or
rape or medical necessity
..
then you cave have an abortion. Does that WORK?
Inconvenience is NEVER a valid reason for the death of a human being... well, unless you are high up in the Bush administration...
(and in this hypothetical situation, there is no BEATING the lie detector test, etc.)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» how about the RIGHT TO PRIVACY
Posted by: goatini
» RE: How About A questionnaire! part 2
Posted by: MilesGregarius
» good one!
Posted by: goatini
» RE: good one!
Posted by: sakul72
» this perv nut proposes that women be interrogated and polygraphed
Posted by: goatini
» RE: How About A questionnaire! part 2
Posted by: sakul72
» ah. the plot thickens
Posted by: goatini
» RE: How About A questionnaire! part 2
Posted by: Phe
» So what you're saying is you think women should be "punished with a baby", right?
Posted by: ZMarie
» RE: So what you're saying is you think women should be "punished with a baby", right?
Posted by: sakul72
» oh, of course you mean that the woman should be punished.
Posted by: goatini
Comments are closed-
Posted by: login@bugmenot.com on Jul 14, 2009 10:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
**no one is celebrating the act of aborting..no one here goes "oh goody, an abortion"
the people here are celebrating that we had the choice to abort...that it was available..we weren't forced to carry to term despite risk to our lives..emotional and physical health...etc..etc...**
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bnvasquez on Jul 14, 2009 4:45 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Give me a break. Read the article more closely and I really wish Alternet could read the stuff it puts on the front of the website. This disgustingly written piece full of subliminal messages needs to be analyzed way differently than everyone is looking at it...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wagadog on Jul 14, 2009 10:09 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even if they had health insurance (which I doubt) it typically does not cover health-related travel such as having a newborn medivac'ed to a facility that can handle many serious complications of birth, and certainly will not cover ALL the costs (been to the hospital lately?).
And yes, as a woman, she will need whatever degree she can get just to be able to afford to feed and clothe herself in this economy. She can expect to make what a (male) high school drop-out earns.
Women have abortions under survival pressure. Not "selfishness", survival pressure.
That her friends turned a fund-raiser into a macabre anti-celebration and vilification of the boyfriend is just an expression of collective frustration at a no-win situation.
Welcome to America. Where, if female, you don't even deserve to LIVE if no man wants you or your baby.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AZLBRAX07 on Jul 16, 2009 11:48 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They are not the "religious right" because they are neither!
They are, simply, pathetic low-lifes who need to force you to "believe" as they do because, by so doing, they can believe their specious crap that much better.
You know: if they tell the same "fable" enough times, it becomes true!
Hal-lay-lew-yah, sweeeeeet jeeeeee-zus!
Amen.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ekoljos on Jul 18, 2009 9:45 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
, bracelet jewelry, eardrop jewelry, necklace jewelry, ring jewelry, finger ring jewelry, earring jewelry.
Tiffany Jewellery.shopping tiffany
offering bangle jewelry, bracelet jewelry, eardrop jewelry, necklace jewelry, ring jewelry, finger ring jewelry and earring jewelry
Tiffany Bracelets
Tiffany Rings
Tiffany Earrings
tiffany
links of london
Tiffany Style Silver Jewelry: Rings, Earrings, Necklaces, Bracelets and more Tiffany Jewelry at low prices
Tiffany Necklaces
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Phe on Jul 21, 2009 1:40 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bobson on Jul 7, 2009 1:41 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Should such a decisions not be carried out with the utmost seriousness and respect to the life that is about to be extinguished?
"Not about to" have a baby because she is 22 and just doesn't want to ruin her fun time is why the pro choice movement has so much trouble. This is abusing that right to choose, and the party, and the other girls wanting to exclude and resenting the boyfriend, this is some seriously cold shit and it offers a new glimpse into the downright darkness that resides in the female soul. This is some stone age pagan shit right here, can't believe it is happening in 2009!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I don't know, I think pro-choice ought to recognize reality
Posted by: jparsons
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: astudent
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: drmflorida
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: Phe
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: daved
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption MANY FOSTER KIDS ARE TOO UP FOR ADOPTION
Posted by: maribelle
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: punkrockhoneymama
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: drmflorida
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: mjglow
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: TNT666
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: daved
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: babs
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: mjglow
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: mjglow
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: dcande01
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: pddpop
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: BobbieT
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: TNT666
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: Phe
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: mjglow
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: BobbieT
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: sakul72
» i don't want your daughter
Posted by: goatini
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: TNT666
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: sakul72
» "I thought conservative woman were the cold, heartless ones."
Posted by: goatini
» RE: "I thought conservative woman were the cold, heartless ones."
Posted by: sakul72
» sorry but i'm not a skank
Posted by: goatini
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption BIRTH CONTROL DOESN"T ALWAYS WORK
Posted by: maribelle
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption BIRTH CONTROL DOESN"T ALWAYS WORK
Posted by: sakul72
» "birth control that is 100% effective is abstinence"
Posted by: goatini
» RE: "birth control that is 100% effective is abstinence"
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: I don't know, why not adoption
Posted by: pddpop
» RE: this was weird
Posted by: khaleesi
» RE: this was weird
Posted by: dmaciewski
» RE: this was weird
Posted by: BobbieT
» RE: this was weird
Posted by: sakul72
» and you would know HOW?
Posted by: goatini
» RE: this was weird
Posted by: FbO Vorcha
» RE: this was weird
Posted by: Cory.Goodman
» RE: this was weird
Posted by: maglindracia
» RE: this was weird
Posted by: Cory.Goodman
» RE: this was weird
Posted by: babs
» RE: this was weird
Posted by: Cat37
» I kind of agree
Posted by: Robba29
» RE: this was weird
Posted by: caritasinveritate
» Wow
Posted by: magoo65293
» Having kids is Stone-age Christian Shit
Posted by: moyshekapoyre
» RE: Having kids is Stone-age Christian Shit
Posted by: sakul72
» OBAMA SCAMS POPE 2X
Posted by: reelman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TNT666 on Jul 7, 2009 2:04 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am very heart warmed that a young lady feels this comfortable with her peer group and her decision.
As for the guy, he is completely irrelevant to the decision-making process. But since his body was 50% responsible for the problem, it would be compassionate of him to contribute financially.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: MilesGregarius
» I agree
Posted by: tymefornew
» RE: I agree
Posted by: TNT666
» RE: I agree
Posted by: MilesGregarius
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: uncertain
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: TNT666
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: bloominblacksheep
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: TNT666
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: hopenosis
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: TNT666
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: FbO Vorcha
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: MT512
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: dcande01
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: TNT666
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: dcande01
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: jackpagan
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: babs
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: kennybent
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: kennybent
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: Beadmaster
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: kennybent
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: TNT666
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: kennybent
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: St. Luke
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: Beadmaster
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: kennybent
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: caritasinveritate
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: kennybent
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: Tombo
» Ladies? Poor choice of noun on so many levels.
Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: Happy to see ladies supporting each other
Posted by: sicdoggy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sfortuna on Jul 7, 2009 3:17 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Other popular games could be pin the bloody coathanger on the politician, and the downstairs belly slide race, where pregnant gals can race to the bottom of the stairs face first in an attempt to dislodge the parasite growing inside her. Men, of course, are excluded from all games except Penis Pinata, where blindfolded women take swings at the guys testicles with a cricket bat until the offending organs are ground to a fine paste, suitable for a cracker spread.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Post abortion party - refreshments
Posted by: Rungle
» RE: Post abortion party
Posted by: Cory.Goodman
» Even though you speak in jest . . .
Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: ven though you speak in jest . . .
Posted by: dmaciewski
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kittybrat on Jul 7, 2009 3:18 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do feel sorry for the male involved. After all, they are a couple, they made the decision together and he is there to emotionally support her.
Too bad for the cold shoulder.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jasonix on Jul 7, 2009 6:29 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Is this like some weird extrovert thing?
Posted by: tlCampbell
» RE: Is this like some weird extrovert thing?
Posted by: bcgirl125
» RE: Is this like some weird extrovert thing?
Posted by: babs
» It's more than weird!
Posted by: countingdaisies
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rastaman on Jul 7, 2009 6:38 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this is precisely the idiots that we defend against Repuglicans saying that pro choice are "pro abortion"....and then another one of these brain dead ditzes proves it to them.
women in this country are childish and stoooooopid......and had better grow up....and fast.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: SICK SICK SICK
Posted by: maglindracia
» RE: SICK SICK SICK
Posted by: Sympa
» RE: SICK SICK SICK
Posted by: TNT666
» RE: SICK SICK SICK
Posted by: babs
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Jul 7, 2009 7:34 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I see cheapening human life has reached a new low. You have made
Posted by: TNT666
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Karina on Jul 7, 2009 7:49 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maggie's choice, Maggie's responsibility.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Odd
Posted by: TheExpatriate
» RE: Odd
Posted by: Karina
Comments are closed-
Posted by: clvngodess on Jul 7, 2009 7:52 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I'm not buying this story at all. - It is a bit strange
Posted by: DanoM
» RE: I'm not buying this story at all. me neither
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: I'm not buying this story at all. me neither
Posted by: samd11
» RE: I'm not buying this story at all.
Posted by: MotherLodeBeth
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Human Being on Jul 7, 2009 8:09 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Abortion is the Achilles heel of us progressives. We rightly agitate about war, poverty, cruelty against animals, ecological destruction, etc. But when it comes to sentient pre-birth humans, we're supposed to chuck all compassion and start prattling about "rights." This is hypocrisy of the absolute worst sort.
I can understand and respect Maggie's (and her boyfriend's) desire not to have their life plans interrupted by parenthood at this time. So the smart thing to do would be to contact an adoption agency now, rather than an abortion clinic, and give the child a chance to live a full life. Isn't that what we progressives claim we want for ALL people?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: kateco2
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: sakul72
» I would consider that "responsibility".
Posted by: kateco2
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: xtine
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: punkrockhoneymama
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: bmmg39
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption... ONLY when there's no option
Posted by: DaBear
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: MT512
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: xtine
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: bmmg39
» Hey! You'll never guess what I found!
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Hey! You'll never guess what I found!
Posted by: bmmg39
» RE: Hey! You'll never guess what I found!
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Hey! You'll never guess what I found!
Posted by: bmmg39
» RE: Hey! You'll never guess what I found!
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption - FAIL
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption - FAIL
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption - FAIL
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption - FAIL
Posted by: sakul72
» NEWBORNS ARE NOT SENTIENT BEINGS
Posted by: Phe
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: MT512
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: mjglow
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: Quannah
» sapience is what makes us human
Posted by: mjglow
» "sentient" does not mean "conscious".
Posted by: goatini
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: TNT666
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: bmmg39
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: TNT666
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: bmmg39
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: punkrockhoneymama
» Not this progressive
Posted by: sunspot
» No, you don't have to prattle about "rights."
Posted by: morticia
» RE: No, you don't have to prattle about "rights."
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Progressives Should Favor Adoption
Posted by: lostvirtue
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jul 7, 2009 8:09 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A FEAST FOR THE PRO-LIFERS !! Um, isn't everything their feast?
Posted by: DaBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Morganx on Jul 7, 2009 8:53 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Bu Bye Alternet Thanks for noticing
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Bu Bye Alternet Thanks for noticing
Posted by: babs
» you're right
Posted by: alizard
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Comrade Rutherford on Jul 7, 2009 9:00 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I knew that ultimately the final decision was hers alone, but she was very keen on my input and my feelings. We made the decision together. I went with her to the clinic and waited for her and then took her home and took care of her while she recovered. Never once did we regret our decision to excise a clump of cells.
As to the story, I don't see anything wrong at all with having a fundraising party. No one is going to come to a fundraising wake. And an 8 week old fetus is NOT a baby!
Now that I am older and my wife and I have kids, I will tell you all that we had two full term stillbirths. Just because you decide not to abort your fetus is NO guarantee that you'll actually have a living baby! Babies die quite often actually for no reason science can find. I simply can't get all self-righteous about aborting fetuses. So get off your high horses and stop reveling in how other people make important decisions about their lives.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» AMEN!!!!!
Posted by: sunspot
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Jul 7, 2009 9:06 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The whole thing seemed perfectly fine to me, creative, responsible, and yeah, the questions raised by the author are pretty damned relevant, even if most 'Merkaaners can't handle grownup discourse yet. (Note how many anti-choice trolls and faux progs cropped up in the comments)
As to the whole "male" thing... I'm still amazed that aggression is the end-all definition of masculinity or "male" and female is rational reasonable and cooperative. I guess sexism is ALWAYS reactionary.
Also the whole notion that males are blankly unaffected by reproduction and reproductive choices, other than financial or as an emotionally supporting role, seems pretty demeaning and irresponsible if not wholly immature and non-functional. The author of the piece stated his own positionality quite well, but in the comments some people got really lost about the BF and the scope of his involvement.
While I would not pretend to speak for all males, as a male, I don't feel ambivalent or distant with respect to my own reproductive potential, actualized or terminated. I have a real problem with progeny in my absence. Every child I've co-created in this life was deliberately chosen and chosen with my being a Dad in mind, connected with co-creator female partner or not. The snip ultimately was the only way to ensure I controlled my own reproductivity. I'm grateful my co-creator female partner still wants me around... and that's a part of the scary vulnerable part of the male experience in reproduction NO ONE talks about (or apparently wants to, we're just thugs afterall). That kid is a part of me and not a part of me... that's pretty damned important. When we weren't ready or we couldn't afford to, we didn't follow the parental path to its fruition. Thankfully we had the safe legal choice technology and hard won civil rights affords most of us. But Men are much more than sperm donors and wallets, we are whole human people too, and we males do have to recognize there are limits since the lionshare of the heavy lifting initially ain't gonna be us for nine months. Sounds to me like Maggie's got a keeper in her BF and her friends who dissed on the guy need to grow up some more.
Men have a LOT more work to do on each other.... time to move past the aggression definition and the financial boundary limit if we're going to be partners. For me the mono-dimensional-male model was one of the unanswered questions that leaves me feeling so bleak...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sureshot45 on Jul 7, 2009 9:32 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
im pro choice, but this is the reason the repubs have so much ammo. this is the stupidest thing i have read in a really long time..and i visit alternet frequently..which says a lot.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: never
Posted by: MT512
» RE: never? Really?
Posted by: DaBear
» Oh yeah, about Repubs and ammo....
Posted by: DaBear
» RE: Oh yeah, about Repubs and ammo....
Posted by: sureshot45
» RE: never
Posted by: maglindracia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maddy on Jul 7, 2009 10:30 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nor do I understand why it's the "compassionate" decision for any person to remain silent out of some wouldbe political deference to the "oppressed." I used to hear this crap all of the time from liberal whites in college classes about race and racism--that they were obligated to remain silent and obedient to the students of color in the room as some kind of anti-racist solidarity. I'd even have white students write in their papers that they couldn't engage a black writer on principle because they couldn't, as a white person, understand said person's experience. My favorite example was when I was leading an impromptu conversation about racism on campus and a white student interrupted us and, angrily, said that we "needed to stop talking because we should not discuss race without a person of color present."
I thought then, and do now, that such a position was nothing but rank cowardice and a skewed brand of leftist politics. It's a basic disrepect to refuse to engage with someone on the grounds that you're somehow honoring them as you do so--it's condescending, patronizing, and fundamentally dishonest.
So, to start, don't give me this crap that "good" (i.e. feminist-leaning) men cannot participate in the abortion debate. Of course you can. If your male friend was hurting at the thought of losing his child, he has a right to that pain, and he also has a right to expect your support. Supporting him doesn't change your position on abortion rights. Challenging these girls on their behavior shouldn't either.
This shouldn't be surprising, but there are folks on the left who can be rigidly dogmatic--even bullying--about their politics. I tend to understand it as a youth thing--a kind of fierce protection resulting from the person feeling that they're under seige all of the time. But, I'm sorry, it's fine to say that you're prochoice but unwilling to watch an innocent person be vilified. It's also fine to say that, at a minimum, that the "open celebration" of a friend's abortion as described herein is tacky and immature, and does nothing to advance pro-choice politics or a feminism that includes men.
This kind of "I can't say what I really feel because I'm privileged" is EXACTLY why the right thinks liberals are weak and pathetic. Integrity should not be set in opposition to loyalty. Period.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Very well said
Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» RE: Very well said
Posted by: humblesound
» RE: Very well said
Posted by: Illiteratilumen
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sakul72 on Jul 7, 2009 10:34 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Selfishness on Display!
Posted by: babs
» RE: Selfishness on Display!
Posted by: sakul72
» BIRTH CONTROL IS NOT FOOLPROOF!
Posted by: sunspot
» RE: BIRTH CONTROL IS NOT FOOLPROOF!
Posted by: MT512
» RE: Selfishness on Display!
Posted by: humblesound
» RE: Selfishness on Display!
Posted by: TheExpatriate
» RE: Selfishness on Display!
Posted by: sakul72
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Honky the Nihilist X on Jul 7, 2009 7:45 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Men are slaves, a violation of the 13th amendment, to a bastard kid.
Men are not provided equal protection under the law as guaranteed by the 14th amendment.
Women will tell a man that wants to abort his responsibility to a child, “Responsibility”, “Too bad”, “shoulda used protection”, “innocent little baby”. We’ll bitches, ditto.
P.S. I’d love meet chicks at an abortion party.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Malou on Jul 7, 2009 10:38 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Agreed
Posted by: soleta_nf
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Quannah on Jul 7, 2009 11:18 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People are awfully judgemental here today!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: morticia on Jul 7, 2009 11:59 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» 1-rater:
Posted by: morticia
» RE: 1-rater:
Posted by: morticia
» RE: 1-rater:
Posted by: morticia
» RE: 1-rater:
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: 1-rater:
Posted by: morticia
» RE: 1-rater:
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: 1-rater:
Posted by: sakul72
» Try me!
Posted by: morticia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bkochandco on Jul 7, 2009 12:09 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» THANK YOU!!! And here I thought it was "just me".
Posted by: kwfryatl
» RE: What the h*ll is a three-year-old doing at a party at 11pm?!
Posted by: MatthewSavage
» RE: What the h*ll is a three-year-old doing at a party at 11pm?!
Posted by: MT512
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ellie on Jul 7, 2009 3:03 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
can we please have some real, adult, mature, thought provoking content for a change???
ps... did anyone think to checks the 'facts' in this story??? is it made up of bull, a straw man scenario or heading towards another battle over vegetarianism which is beyond boring...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lilly on Jul 7, 2009 4:00 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ladyoracle on Jul 7, 2009 8:10 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would absolutely attend a party raising money for an abortion, and I see nothing anti-feminist about it, except the way the guy was treated, unless there's backstory missing.
However, I am concerned about the 3-yr old at a party so late at night. The author as well as the other people at the party seem too irresponsible, self-absorbed, and flaky to have intelligent ideas about what "choice" really means. It's clear that Maggie wasn't ready for motherhood, and that's fine, but I wonder if once the undergraduate high wears off a lot of the people who were at the party will rethink how they acted that night and what it really meant. It seems like it ended up meaning nothing. That is sad.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: humblesound on Jul 8, 2009 1:48 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are people here who are vehemently opposed to this party happening. They frown completely on the actions of that woman and would love to shame her for it. Okay...
But why are you shaming Alternet for this article? A narrative thing that someone wrote explaining their experience attending and being a part of something they were both taken aback by and had never seen before.
How is that sort of personal diary style journalism the thing that needs to be burned to the fucking ground on your witch hunt?
This article's fine.
Now the nonstop articles telling us we need to stop eating meat based on what our teeth look like? Those could go.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Lot of misguided rage in the comments section today...
Posted by: WebShaman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jayteapee on Jul 8, 2009 8:42 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Old Skeptic on Jul 8, 2009 9:23 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is interesting that the loudest voices in the anti-choice crowd always seem to belong to men, who by grace of a fortunate "Y" chromosome are forever protected from having to make this decision for their own bodies. I strongly suspect that if men could get pregnant, abortion would be a total non-issue and birth control would be a sacrament.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why not adoption? some ask
Posted by: daved
» RE: Why not adoption? some ask
Posted by: Phe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: enough already.... on Jul 8, 2009 11:10 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interestingly, recent polls indicate that being pro-abortion (which was in a pretty much a satistical dead-heat with being pro-life) has recently declined U.S. wide. For the first time in a few decades, the U.S. is pretty firmly pro-life.
These are facts, not opinions. Flame all you want, but that's what it is.
Now a question.... could it be that being pro-choice only serves to further victimize women? It seems young men in national polls certainly think its a good thing to have responsibility-free sex, and it seems that women think differently.
Now another question.... can anyone give a good answer on why a fetus (whatever stage) is not a human. Just saying its a clump of cells, or that it doesn't look like a human are not answers. Those are called conclusory assertions, without any basis other than one's own knee jerk opinion. I'd like to see a truly reasoned opinion on the matter. Note that I like Paglia's answer to the question a great deal... that abortion is killing a human, but that she's still pro-choice. At least that's intellectually honest.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Ironic post from Old Skeptic
Posted by: Old Skeptic
» RE: Ironic post from Old Skeptic
Posted by: TNT666
» RE: Ironic post from Old Skeptic
Posted by: daved
» RE: Ironic post from Old Skeptic
Posted by: photon's feather
» and that altar servers
Posted by: goatini
» RE: Ironic post from Old Skeptic
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Ironic post from Old Skeptic
Posted by: Cytocop
» RE: Ironic post from Old Skeptic
Posted by: Phe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ML561 on Jul 8, 2009 2:40 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It takes TWO to create a baby. Women don't get pregnant all by their lonesome. Men need to be taught some sort of sexual responsibility as well. It is simply not true that boys can't keep it in their pants, and that it is the woman who bears the burden should things get out of hand. I feel the abortion party was in bad taste as were many of the comments regarding it, including some of the profanity..let's keep it clean, please, and try to have some intelligent and thoughtful discourse.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ML561
Posted by: maglindracia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fosterdad on Jul 8, 2009 4:26 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a shame.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: What a shame
Posted by: faerietails
» RE: What a shame
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: What a shame
Posted by: MilesGregarius
» RE: What a shame
Posted by: sakul72
» picky picky picky
Posted by: goatini
» RE: What a shame
Posted by: fosterdad
» so what?
Posted by: goatini
» no one is obligated
Posted by: goatini
» RE: no one is obligated
Posted by: fosterdad
» YES, it is wrong.
Posted by: goatini
» RE: YES, it is wrong.
Posted by: fosterdad
» yeah, it's SO bad to abhor people
Posted by: goatini
» PS, a FETUS is not a CHILD
Posted by: goatini
» fetuses are not children
Posted by: mcubed
» RE: fetuses are not children
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: no one is obligated
Posted by: Phe
» RE: no one is obligated
Posted by: fosterdad
» so you think you are entitled to some kind of prize?
Posted by: goatini
» RE: so you think you are entitled to some kind of prize?
Posted by: sakul72
» "you are all pretty flexible in the mattress department"
Posted by: goatini
» RE: "you are all pretty flexible in the mattress department"
Posted by: sakul72
» what i meant is that men like you
Posted by: goatini
» RE: no one is obligated
Posted by: Quannah
» thank you Q, my friend,
Posted by: goatini
» I never said anyone is obligated
Posted by: fosterdad
» what a steaming pile of sanctimonious dookie
Posted by: goatini
» RE: what a steaming pile of sanctimonious dookie
Posted by: sakul72
» when i see posts that contain the language "keep your legs together"
Posted by: goatini
» RE: when i see posts that contain the language "keep your legs together"
Posted by: sakul72
» "Stop cutting people down that don't agree with you"
Posted by: goatini
» How Biased Adoption Language Tears Families Apart
Posted by: goatini
» Adoption Ethics - An Oxymoron
Posted by: goatini
» Adoption: The Damage to Children
Posted by: goatini
» RE: Adoption: The Damage to Children
Posted by: Phe
» Breaking the Silence: On Living "Pro-Lifers'" Choice for Women
Posted by: goatini
» Bullseye, goatini...
Posted by: morticia
» not my piece, mort,
Posted by: goatini
» RE: Breaking the Silence: On Living "Pro-Lifers'" Choice for Women
Posted by: sakul72
» "I have 2 kids now"
Posted by: goatini
» NOW all can see who is the black heart
Posted by: goatini
» RE: NOW all can see who is the black heart
Posted by: sakul72
» yeah, i would hate to see
Posted by: goatini
» Maggie and her boyfriend agreed on abortion
Posted by: mcubed
» RE: What a shame
Posted by: TNT666
» well, of course,
Posted by: goatini
» RE: What a shame
Posted by: login@bugmenot.com
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sakul72 on Jul 9, 2009 5:45 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seems that is a rare thing with liberal women these days... It is extremely unattractive to a man looking for a mate, but hell yeah if you are just looking for a good time...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Is there at least one Liberal woman that knows what responsibility means?
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Is there at least one Liberal woman that knows what responsibility means?
Posted by: morticia
» Yo! sakul72! Question for you!
Posted by: morticia
» Glad to see...
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Glad to see...
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Glad to see...
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Glad to see...
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: Glad to see...
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Glad to see...
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: Yo! sakul72! Question for you!
Posted by: sakul72
» I asked you if....
Posted by: morticia
» Responsibility for children
Posted by: mcubed
» RE: esponsibility for children
Posted by: sakul72
» RE: esponsibility for children
Posted by: Phe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: login@bugmenot.com on Jul 9, 2009 7:50 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Hillymeg on Jul 9, 2009 2:19 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
bit.ly/15Ht7j
Hope you'll comment too!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I wouldn't try the punch, that's for sure
Posted by: TheExpatriate
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Robba29 on Jul 9, 2009 10:44 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Did this get posted...
Posted by: daved
» FETUS is not a BABY
Posted by: goatini
» RE: FETUS is A LIFE - corrected for you
Posted by: sakul72
» "your anology (sic) is worthless"
Posted by: goatini
Comments are closed-
Posted by: daved on Jul 10, 2009 10:27 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You may be almost out of your shoes.....
Posted by: morticia
» have you heard of "Rent Parties"?
Posted by: mcubed
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kmby06 on Jul 11, 2009 9:44 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fact that her partner was willing to support her in the decision should NEVER be miscounted. So many women go through abortions in silence, with a fear of stigma and rejection. Had my partner been there for me emotionally, I would have handled the situation much better, and wouldn't have gone through multiple levels of depression afterwards. This woman's 'friends' are arrogant and misguided clowns that are the reason women get viewed in a harsh light as far as our rights to our bodies are concerned. No one but the woman in question has the right to say who is 'supposed' to be a pillar of support through a trying time, and furthermore assuming he should be pony-ing up the money for the abortion seems to contradict the idea of the woman managing everything, decision and procedure on her own.
To anyone with a more modest view on abortion or looking for reasons to stand against a pro-choice lifestyle, please don't take this superficial article as the standard for modern women and our right to choose. Some people just want to make a shock statement.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: At what point do we get real about our 'roles' in abortion?
Posted by: morticia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AZLBRAX07 on Jul 11, 2009 2:00 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"These were liberal people, after all… I couldn’t help but notice how aggressive…their attitudes became when confronted with the issue of a woman’s right to choose. It was almost as if, in the process of upholding an ideal of openness and acceptance, they had fallen victim to the same forces they were trying to critique."
I have noticed how hypocritical, vitriolic, downright fanatical and narrow-minded many of the people who respond to the articles on 'Alternet.org' tend to be...at least, when one offers a reasonable opinion that isn't in lock-step with The Party Line. Then again, 'Alternet.org' is equally hypocritical in the way certain responses are "censored"…even though those responses don't stray from the guidelines we, all, agreed to.
It would appear that the New Left is nothing but the reverse side of the same smarmy coin the Neocons are on!
FYI: I am pro-choice in ALL things, not just a woman's right to choose!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I don't understand your comment
Posted by: mcubed
» RE: I don't understand your comment
Posted by: AZLBRAX07
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ms_happy on Jul 13, 2009 3:07 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Isn't it better.....
Posted by: sakul72
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LEB on Jul 14, 2009 7:53 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sakul72 on Jul 14, 2009 8:39 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The question could be:
did you honestly attempt birth control, and the condom broke, or whatever.. the bc failed..
or
is it a provable fact that this baby will be better of DEAD in a garbage can than living, breathing etc..
and/or
you can prove that you are a responsible person, that this was a grave mistake and not just an easy way to get out of irresponsible and selfish behavior.
and/or
rape or medical necessity
..
then you cave have an abortion. Does that WORK?
Inconvenience is NEVER a valid reason for the death of a human being... well, unless you are high up in the Bush administration...
(and in this hypothetical situation, there is no BEATING the lie detector test, etc.)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» how about the RIGHT TO PRIVACY
Posted by: goatini
» RE: How About A questionnaire! part 2
Posted by: MilesGregarius
» good one!
Posted by: goatini
» RE: good one!
Posted by: sakul72
» this perv nut proposes that women be interrogated and polygraphed
Posted by: goatini
» RE: How About A questionnaire! part 2
Posted by: sakul72
» ah. the plot thickens
Posted by: goatini
» RE: How About A questionnaire! part 2
Posted by: Phe
» So what you're saying is you think women should be "punished with a baby", right?
Posted by: ZMarie
» RE: So what you're saying is you think women should be "punished with a baby", right?
Posted by: sakul72
» oh, of course you mean that the woman should be punished.
Posted by: goatini
Comments are closed-
Posted by: login@bugmenot.com on Jul 14, 2009 10:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
**no one is celebrating the act of aborting..no one here goes "oh goody, an abortion"
the people here are celebrating that we had the choice to abort...that it was available..we weren't forced to carry to term despite risk to our lives..emotional and physical health...etc..etc...**
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bnvasquez on Jul 14, 2009 4:45 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Give me a break. Read the article more closely and I really wish Alternet could read the stuff it puts on the front of the website. This disgustingly written piece full of subliminal messages needs to be analyzed way differently than everyone is looking at it...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wagadog on Jul 14, 2009 10:09 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even if they had health insurance (which I doubt) it typically does not cover health-related travel such as having a newborn medivac'ed to a facility that can handle many serious complications of birth, and certainly will not cover ALL the costs (been to the hospital lately?).
And yes, as a woman, she will need whatever degree she can get just to be able to afford to feed and clothe herself in this economy. She can expect to make what a (male) high school drop-out earns.
Women have abortions under survival pressure. Not "selfishness", survival pressure.
That her friends turned a fund-raiser into a macabre anti-celebration and vilification of the boyfriend is just an expression of collective frustration at a no-win situation.
Welcome to America. Where, if female, you don't even deserve to LIVE if no man wants you or your baby.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AZLBRAX07 on Jul 16, 2009 11:48 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They are not the "religious right" because they are neither!
They are, simply, pathetic low-lifes who need to force you to "believe" as they do because, by so doing, they can believe their specious crap that much better.
You know: if they tell the same "fable" enough times, it becomes true!
Hal-lay-lew-yah, sweeeeeet jeeeeee-zus!
Amen.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ekoljos on Jul 18, 2009 9:45 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
, bracelet jewelry, eardrop jewelry, necklace jewelry, ring jewelry, finger ring jewelry, earring jewelry.
Tiffany Jewellery.shopping tiffany
offering bangle jewelry, bracelet jewelry, eardrop jewelry, necklace jewelry, ring jewelry, finger ring jewelry and earring jewelry
Tiffany Bracelets
Tiffany Rings
Tiffany Earrings
tiffany
links of london
Tiffany Style Silver Jewelry: Rings, Earrings, Necklaces, Bracelets and more Tiffany Jewelry at low prices
Tiffany Necklaces
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Phe on Jul 21, 2009 1:40 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Updated: Catholic Bishops Embrace Anti-Abortion Terrorizers Missy Smith and Randall Terry
10 Defining Feminist Moments of 2009
Going Undercover in the Crazy, Tragic World of Christian Gay-Conversion Therapy




