Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Reproductive Justice and Gender

"Twilight" Pushes the Harmful Gender Stereotypes We've Fought for Decades

By Esté Yarmosh, The Women's Media Center. Posted July 7, 2009.


Young readers of the popular books encounter women shoved back into traditional gender stereotypes that have taken years of effort to overcome.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Some make excuses for the immensely popular Twilight book series by saying, "well, at least kids are reading now.” I, too, think that it’s great if kids and teenagers are starting to read again, especially after the National Endowment for the Arts sobering report on reading rates in 2007, which found, for example, that less than one-third of 13-year-olds are daily readers, a 14 percent decline from 20 years earlier.

Yet it is the message in Twilight that is disturbing. Young readers encounter women, embodied in narrator Bella Swan, shoved back into traditional gender stereotypes that have taken years of effort to overcome. And millions of young girls (not to mention adult women) are devouring these books.

I worry about the girls who seem, with quite a bit of personal conviction, to put one of the main characters of the Twilight "saga,” the vampire Edward Cullen, on such a high pedestal that they think he is the ultimate ideal of a boyfriend. That he is not. These girls need a wake-up call: Edward Cullen is a caricature of an emotionally, psychologically and physically abusive boyfriend -- and one with supernatural powers no less. It can’t be healthy to have an attachment to a fictional character with those qualities, much less a real person.

Apart from the vampires who attack Bella at the end of the first book (Twilight), Edward is the source of most of her abuse. He is dangerously possessive. In the third book (Eclipse), for example, the vampire boyfriend removes the engine from Bella’s car because she wants to go visit her friend Jacob Black. Edward stalks her, constantly asks where she is going and what she is doing and plays hot and cold in their love affair. He neglects her emotionally in some passages; in others, he tells her he loves her and wants to be with her forever.

A phrase in the series is used to sum up the relationship between Edward and Bella: "and so the lion fell in love with the lamb.” A symbolic, romantic concept perhaps, but it only reinforces traditional gender stereotypes of males being strong and dominant, and females being meek, demure and passive. Feminists have fought for decades to eradicate this trope and to stretch the boundaries of how females are viewed by the dominant society.

The phrase "and so the lion fell in love with the lamb” attempts to evoke a space where the strong and weak can co-exist peacefully. Is it also meant to suggest that the rapist/sexual assaulter can have tender feelings for his victim? With all its associations, the phrase is a prominent feature of Twilight-inspired jewelry and tee shirts populating the Internet. Its problematic quality is reinforced by Twilight series dialogue in which Bella often refers to herself as a "stupid lamb” and Edward calls himself a "sick, masochistic lion.” They may recognize their personality disorders but the books never deal with the damage. Instead, Twilight glorifies the "masochism,” making it a fetish that burrows into the minds of young readers. One website featured a Christmas ornament with the phrase "Property of Edward Cullen -- Forks, WA.” The product description read, "You belong to sexy sparkly vampire Edward Cullen now.”

One work of literature cannot undermine all the significant milestones and strides feminists have made in the last several decades. Nonetheless, young girls are very impressionable. Twilight books and movies are reportedly targeted to a junior-high and high-school audience, but one photo caption I saw in a newspaper article on the popularity of the series identified the reader pictured curled up with one of the books as nine years old. I couldn’t help worrying about what she is picking up from its pages.

"To put it simply, dear reader, I was horrified,” says Kellen Rice of Blast Magazine. "Not just by the sickeningly purple prose or the lack of general writing quality, but the books themselves are insulting on every level -- as a woman, as a teenager, as a literature student, and as a graduate of the Harry Potter craze. What’s worse is that so few seem to realize it.”


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: gender, women, men, relationships, twilight

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Reproductive Justice and Gender! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Not true
Posted by: EinMD on Jul 7, 2009 4:11 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Twilight introduced a third gender nobody's seen before actually.

That gender would be: CRAP.

Sparkly vampires? C'mon man!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not true Posted by: keithmanify
Just remember
Posted by: SalB on Jul 7, 2009 8:45 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How hard it was to get, how quickly it can all go away. Equality between the sexes won't happen overnight, and just a decade of the abstinence only education and all the other things we've had to focus on instead of educating our kids is taking its toll.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Speaking of crap
Posted by: abilitante254 on Jul 7, 2009 11:01 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I believe that you have the right to an opinion in favor of an anti-fem reading of Twilight, I think that you are really wrong! First, get public opinion right, girls put Edward's self sacrificing love on a pedestal not all of his decisions because he makes dumb ones for the right reasons. The only physical "abuse" I can think of is when Bella is thrown into the table in an effort to prevent her from being drained by Jasper and after their first time which Edward was against while she was human anyway. I see zero hints of psychological abuse and the only reason I won't directly try to disprove emotional abuse is because I'm sure it will fall on deaf ears.

In Eclipse after Edward disables Bella's truck, he later drives her directly to Jacob. He only "stalks" her and asks where she'll be so that he is able to protect her, not as a man protecting a woman but as a super strong immortal protecting a human with danger jumping out at every turn.

The phrase, "and so the lion fell in love with the lamb.”, has nothing to do with gender! It actually means the predator(vampire) fell in love with its prey(really good smelling human)! "Stupid lamb" and "masochistic lion"(which by the way, often is a bit of an overstatement) are used because Bella is WILLINGLY putting herself in danger and Edward is causing himself acute physical pain in order for their relationship to work.
Bella also basically wears the pants in the relationship, when Edward doesn't want her to do something she either decides he did make the best choice or does it anyway. For example, he takes her to the prom and she really enjoys it... He says he has to leave to leave to keep her safe and they get married because she said he was wrong... He says don't see Jacob, she skips school and rides off with Jacob on his bike... he wants to fight Victoria she tells him not to (and he mostly complies)... he says no vamp/human sex she says that's dumb and they go at it like rabbits after a small incident. She also becomes the most powerful character in the series during Breaking Dawn which, if it weren't plain enough to see, Stephenie Meyer said herself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Speaking of crap Posted by: humblesound
» RE: Speaking of crap Posted by: shelenka
Oh jeez, not this shit again.
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing on Jul 8, 2009 6:32 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did Alternet post this idiocy because they couldn't get their weekly pro-vegan propaganda?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You're wrong!!
Posted by: carlamaria on Jul 8, 2009 7:12 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First...this a fictional book. So inmerse yourself into looking so much into it is unrealistic and ridiculous!! Being a little more realistic and going to your point, everyone of us girls at some point has been in love with somebody wrong for us, and had problems with our self-esteem..if you haven't well them good fou you. The point being that Edward is a 100 something vampire fighting againts what he is to try and be good. Finds the love of his life, in definetly the wrong person. So he foughts with himself to be happy and make her happy, and SAFE!! This feministic crap is ridiculous!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

She's right on the money
Posted by: simonsbuddy on Jul 8, 2009 7:30 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Take a look at http://www.rebelliouspixels.com/ for a creative response to the author's thesis.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

wow
Posted by: jadedgreen13 on Jul 8, 2009 12:16 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obviously you haven't read any of the books. He doesn't overpower her.
Bella actually tries to save Edward herself but obviously human strength is nowhere near equal to vampire strength. Since in Twilight vampires aren't "staked" incredible non-human stength is needed. But after she becomes a vampire she can and she saves Edward and other vampires from a vampire war. And again, if you read the book, you would no she becomes a much stronger vampire than Edward and her powers earned protect Edward and her daughter and everyone else for that matter.
Don't judge until you've fully researched the subject. AND btw some girls want to be saved and adored like Edward does for Bella. Hell, I would love to be saved and not have to put any effort into getting out safely. I don't want to get hurt or possibly die. Sorry. I guess I'm anti-feminist too even though I'm a female.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: wow Posted by: maglindracia
Just more of the same.
Posted by: countingdaisies on Jul 9, 2009 6:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is this book any different than the crap on television or at the movies? Sounds like most of the stuff that young people are watching these days. And, according to some of the comments here, there are some adults who actually read crap, too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

True Blood
Posted by: jennymac on Jul 11, 2009 12:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unless you're under 18, which I doubt most readers of Alternet are, watch True Blood on HBO for an adult take on vampires. Sexy, yet VERY strong women, not to mention a lot of eye candy for both sexes. And it fits with the story, def not gratuitous crap. Kudos to Alan Ball of Six Feet Under and other great shows.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ugh...
Posted by: bnvasquez on Jul 11, 2009 2:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fact that so many of my friends (I'm in college by the way, so yeah college kids are getting into this stuff) are in love with the whole series really disturbs me. Even putting all of the stereotypes aside, the movie was really crappy in my eyes. It was boring and not what I expected at all, and I've heard that the writing quality of the books are not high either. I can't promote stalking and abuse in a literature format, I don't care how popular it is...And yes feminists HAVE been working to hard to stop this stereotype and portrayal of women.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement