Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Reproductive Justice and Gender

Men, Take a Stand Against Domestic Violence

By Rob Okun, AlterNet. Posted June 21, 2009.


For decades women have been doing the heavy lifting to prevent domestic violence. More men need to join. Now.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

How can we comfortably celebrate Father’s Day in the middle of a domestic violence epidemic? Yes, suffering and celebrating are simultaneous truths in life. But there is an urgency -- and opportunity -- right now to transform this holiday. Fatherhood has perhaps never been more visible than today, in part because of the current occupant of the White House (and the vice-president, who for many years was a single dad). Let’s seize the moment to transform the day from one of consumerism to one of activism.

Even though it’s a minority of men who perpetrate violence against women, the results are devastating. Think what it could mean if Father’s Day became a time men stepped forward as peacemakers in our families. Grandfathers, sons, brothers, uncles, nephews, cousins, and neighbors could all be involved. There would be plenty of time for suppertime barbeques if we spent Father’s Day advocating on behalf of women’s and girls safety and, as a byproduct, for boys and men’s growth. If we can’t work to achieve peace in our homes how can we expect to end violence between nations?

Scan the headlines and there’s likely to be a story about a guy who’s beaten up his wife or girlfriend. Where I live in western Massachusetts, a man recently beat to death the daughter of friends’ of friends. It knocked the wind out of me. I never get used to it.

Over the years I’ve spoken at rallies in the aftermath of domestic violence murders and it never gets easier. A minority of men are perpetuating a cruel lie that says it’s okay for men to beat the woman they proclaim to love. Outrageous. It’s got to stop.

I know the vast majority of fathers -- and men -- aren’t violent. Yet there’s a small, vocal element out there promoting a dangerous, tough guy brand of masculinity. If the majority of nonviolent men stand mute, then manhood ends up being defined by screaming dads threatening coaches at Little League games, Rush Limbaugh and his ilk, and untold brooding brothers-in-law restricting contact with your sister. We can’t let that happen. The days of, “Hey, I’m a good guy, I don’t abuse my wife, assault women, or insist her “no” really meant “yes”’ should long be over. To challenge a twisted definition of masculinity that condones men subjugating women requires leaving the sidelines of silence for the playing fields of action. It’s a cop out to claim this epidemic is a women’s issue. For decades women have been doing the heavy lifting to prevent domestic violence. More men need to join. Now.

To start, we need to take a hard look at the privilege and entitlement we’ve long assumed as our birthright. We have to be willing to ditch the old model of men as king of the castle. There are greater rewards across the moat in the vineyards of equality: an increase in emotional literacy. Closer connections with the women and other men in our lives. Deeper relationships with our children.

Much has been made of President Obama taking his wife on a couple of dates recently. Commentators have been a twitter with how unfair many men felt it was, claiming the president had raised the relationship bar too high. President Obama deserves no extra points for paying attention to his marriage or his children. Sure, he’s modeling how a man and father ought to act but he’d undoubtedly agree that he merits no special pat on the back for doing so.

The idea behind Father’s Day as a time to acknowledge what it takes to raise children -- and the precious gift of being a parent -- is a wonderful reason to celebrate. But in a world where too many fathers and men are angry, hurt, and hurting others, maybe it’s time for a moratorium on conventional Father’s Day gift giving. Maybe some of the millions going to Hallmark and Wal-Mart could be better directed to a fund supporting women’s and children’s safety, and boys’ and men’s education. Maybe the president and vice-president would be among the first to make contributions. That would be a stimulus package I could really get behind.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: gender, women, men, relationships, domestic violence

Rob Okun is editor of Voice Male magazine. His essay, "Confessions of a Premature Profeminist" appears in Men Speak Out: Views on Gender, Sex and Power, (Routledge, 2008).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Reproductive Justice and Gender! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
There are no "by-standers" in a war zone
Posted by: gendershaman on Jun 22, 2009 8:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with your opening point, but your presentation of the problem minimizes this very real problem. This is an epidemic of male violence and male refusal to engage other men in any dialog towards ending male violence. Stop avoiding the extent and virulence of the problem by speaking about "minority," "small, but vocal," and other phrases intended to reassure most men that they have nothing to examine in their attitudes and behaviors. I feel that your effort to bring attention to the problem will have the opposite effect when you don't validate how all males are affected by male violence as well as are females.
All men do not emotionally, psychologically, physically, sexually abuse their partners, but the belief system which teaches the hate is familiar to all males. The fact that so few men speak out against domestic violence perpetrators reveals the extent of the problem. Middle school, high school and college-aged males can cite no male they have been exposed to or heard of who condemns domestic violence (or sexual assault, child abuse, etc.). As they grow they do not see an alternative to the Neanderthal abuser. The "privilege and entitlement we’ve long assumed as our birthright" is our birthright. There are not a few bad apples responsible for the millions of beatings.
America prefers abusive sons to gentle sons. "Gentle" is too close to gay for most men. That is the problem.
Thank you,
Joe Weinberg

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Domestic violence helps fill our military
Posted by: gendershaman on Jun 22, 2009 8:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The first time I went to juvenile prison as a rape prevention educator, I was nervous. I was initially shocked to hear them express the same attitudes about sex, females, what it meant to be a real man as the high school boys and college men I had worked with. Often the behavior that high school boys and college men confessed to wasn’t different than what the teens in prison admitted to. In all these environments, as I listened to their stories, some revealed that they were survivors of incest and sexual assault.
As I listened to their stories, many revealed that they were witnesses to or secondary victims of domestic violence. As I listened to their stories, almost all told of having been bullied by older boys and men. Most boys brushed off my expressions of empathy. All the abuse, being bullied, beaten, even sexually assaulted were “just part of growing up male.”
But many of them admitted to wanting revenge. They seethe with rage. Nationally over half of teen boys in prison for homicide had killed their mother’s abuser. The US Military has always gladly recruited men who as boys had been subjected to abuses for which they now want to hurt someone just as they were hurt.
This is how we fill our Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force. Wounded men who want revenge.

We can stop the military machine cold by healing its fodder--wounded males.
Stop keeping boys ignorant of their feelings
Celebrate their uniqueness, stop forcing them to conform to the genderizing machine
Teach them to love, not to fear love
If they love, yes, they open themselves to sadness and heartache
But loving opens them to take emotional risks
Loving opens them to see all people as people, as other lovers of people
Our sons have learned a sex that is divorced from love
They have learned to fear love
Their genitals are divorced from their hearts
It is this separation that predisposes males to respond viscerally to political/religious/economic systems that build on the discord that is their consciences

The model is taught to our kids in sex education, that males do sex to (preferably inert and uninterested) females who’s humanity, independence, ability to enjoy sex, and capacity to engage in sex are constrained by the male-defined model of sex which predominates.
The fundamentalists that hate sex love war, they love Bushes’ war.
Heal boys’ pain—stop tolerating the exemplary citizens—clergy, coaches, and scoutmasters, among others who prey on them. Stop defending boys abusing girls and other boys, as just “boys will be boys.”
We can teach boys truly to “make love and not war” abroad and at home.
Thank you,
Joe Weinberg

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sign me up - NOT!
Posted by: MartianBachelor on Jun 23, 2009 7:38 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought being my brothers keeper was a staple of Xtian wingnuts...

If women choose Neanderthals, jerks, douchebags, and abusers - as they seem wont to do all too often - who am I to deny them their choice?

Didn't paternalism and trying to be protective of weak widdle women go totally out of style about thirty or forty years ago?

Besides, what kind of killjoy kook brings up DV at a weekend BBQ? Yea, I really want to be that creepy guy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sign me up - NOT! Posted by: kaden
Sign me up - yes!
Posted by: Ben Atherton-Zeman on Jun 23, 2009 8:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once again, Rob Okun makes me proud to be in the same movement that he's in. Very articulate, wonderful article for Father's Day written by one of my favorite fathers besides my own.

Whether men's violence is perpetrated by a minority of men, or supported by a majority of men (thanks, Joe and vawnews), it's clearly men's responsibility to stand up against it. I, for one, will answer the call. I will be "that guy at the barbeque" and risk making folks uncomfortable to bring up this important issue.

My thanks to Rob, to the huge amount of women and to the few (but growing) number of men who work to reduce our gender's violence.

- Ben Atherton-Zeman, author and performer of the one-man play, "Voices of Men"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sign me up - yes! Posted by: laoma
» RE: Sign me up - yes! Posted by: kaden
Alcohol fuels conflicts,
Posted by: weathered on Jun 23, 2009 10:40 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
its always part of the problem somewhere in the chain of events.

Its a family/relationship dis-ease.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Alcohol fuels conflicts, Posted by: popsicle67
Not mute, but not screaming
Posted by: mr. joshua on Jun 25, 2009 2:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the majority of nonviolent men stand mute, then manhood ends up being defined by screaming dads threatening coaches at Little League games, Rush Limbaugh and his ilk, and untold brooding brothers-in-law restricting contact with your sister.

The majority of us are far from mute. We are raising, teaching, supporting, cherishing, and loving our daughters and sons. We have little use for raised voices or raised fists. We laugh and sing with our wives and children. You won't hear us on talk radio, or find us screaming obscenities at Little League games. We are your neighbors. We are your brothers and sons. We are the men you celebrate when you acknowledge us on Father's Day.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A the "abusive male" stereotype.
Posted by: rickiey on Jun 26, 2009 8:10 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A few facts for you:

49% of child abuse cases are committed by single mothers.

22% of child abuse cases are committed by married or partnered mothers.

7% of child abuse cases are commited by single fathers

8% of child abuse cases are committed by married or partnered fathers.

7% of child abuse cases are committed by people unrelated to the child but familiar (this category includes teachers and clergy)

6% of child abuse cases are committed by strangers to the children.

Source:
Joan Ditson and Sharon Shay's Study of Child Abuse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Many Thanks from the Front
Posted by: kaden on Jun 27, 2009 11:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for this article, Mr. Okun. And thanks to all the beautiful, evolved men who posted here in support of what you said, and who promised to "answer the call" to start speaking up and standing up. We really need your help, and your voices, in every moment, every sphere of life. It's hard to be the "bad guy" all the time, and so often we are alone in the moment. [And then get stuck with that nasty label that begins with "B".]

Thank you for the hope. And the promise. And for clearly defining what it really means to be a man.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Men: You are RIGHT. From: An abuse victim.
Posted by: JaneDaisy on Jul 4, 2009 3:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Men,

You're right.

I'm a victim of physical violence at the hand of a man.

There's no excuse for ANY violence in a relationship.

Our's is a classic example: he verbally abused me, it turned physical, with actual injuries, he denied it, the police did nothing, he began stalking when I filed for divorce blah, blah.... No excuses for his, or my behaviors or the ridiculous apathy of the police or the courts.

The salient thing here is that in ALL of that, we BOTH recognized that there is virtually NO help for the ABUSER, even if they recognize and WANT to change.

I'm a woman. We're all about emotions, feelings and working with those. We get fair to POOR help in abusive situations. It's NOT good.

You're men.

But in the RARE instance that a man could or would see that he might have a problem AND try to address it, the whole institutinal framework is hostile toward him. NOT MAKING EXCUSES, and mine is a classic, cyclic abuser.

WHAT HELP IS THERE FOR MEN????

Little. If any. And what there is is hostile toward them, is punitive and leaves no room to save face, for these men for whom pride and face-saving is ALREADY one of their most difficult issues.

WHY IS IT SO HARD FOR MEN TO GET HELP????

No wonder they don't. We women would LOVE our (abusing) men to get past their "issues" that harm us both. Our men have great things to offer! That's why we're with them, and many times, why we stay with them.

Women's returning to them confounds police and the courts. But they're not violent all the time. And these men ARE often good men who simply don't know how to change, or don't know why they do this. So women are forced to villify these men, leave them and the men are left to repeat their behaviors.

WHY IS IT SO HARD FOR MEN TO FIND HELP???

This is bizarre. Women can find help (though the police and courts can be complete Neandrethals at recognizing and dealing with it), solace and support, but what about men???

My man and I were stymied by this, and are so entangled in the legal system, while loving/abusing/whatever each other and are completely confounded. Though we can't legally speak to each other, due to the protective order I had to take out.

Geez. Please respond, men. Women. (Police? Court officials?)

Jane Daisy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement