COMMENTS: 558
The Tiller Murder Wasn't a Lone Killer's Sick Plot; It Came Out of the Radical Anti-Abortion Movement
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Reproductive Justice headlines via email.
George Tiller, a Kansas physician, was shot to death in church on Sunday. He was one of only a handful of doctors in the United States providing late-term therapeutic abortions for women in need -- women whose pregnancies threatened their lives or their health, and women who learned that they were carrying fetuses with severe abnormalities. Women traveled across the country to see Tiller when their own physicians and local medical providers couldn't help them. For many women, Tiller was, as one of his patients put it, "the one shining light in the worst week of my life".
He was also a major lightening-rod in the abortion wars. Anti-choicers harassed his patients, day in and day out. They bombed his clinic. They shot him once before. They filed lawsuit after lawsuit and even convinced local prosecutors to launch criminal investigations and trials (none were successful). They published his home address and the full names of his family members on their websites. They posted information about anyone who did business with him, from where he got his coffee to where he did his dry cleaning.
They had him and his staff wearing bullet-proof vests to work every day. Tiller drove an armored car and protected his home with a state-of-the-art security system. And, to better enable stalking and harassment, they posted his daily comings and goings -- including the fact that he attended services every Sunday at Reformation Lutheran Church, the place where he was ultimately shot and killed.
All because he was a licensed physician who performed legal medical procedures.
Not surprisingly, his killer is strongly suspected to be affiliated with the "pro-life" movement. If that's the case, it makes Tiller the 10th person in the United States to be murdered by anti-choice terrorists.
And that's just the tip of the iceberg. Since 1977, there have been at least 17 attempted murders, 383 death threats, 153 incidents of assault or battery and three kidnappings committed against abortion providers in North America. Tiller himself survived an assassination attempt in 1993.
Some pro-life groups are issuing statements of condemnation and attempting to paint this murder as the work of an extremist. But this latest act of terrorism is, sadly, not an anomaly. It is part of a clearly-established pattern of harassment, intimidation and violence against abortion providers and pro-choice individuals. And mainstream pro-life groups shoulder much of the blame.
Pro-life organizations routinely refer to abortion as "murder", a "genocide" and a "holocaust". They post the full names abortion providers on their websites, along with their addresses, their license plate numbers, their photos, the names of children and the schools those children attend (sometimes with helpful Wild-West-style "Wanted" posters offering $5,000 rewards).
Stay up to date with the latest Reproductive Justice headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rakista on Jun 1, 2009 3:10 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look, you do yourselves no favour attempting to demonize and dehumanize all pro-lifers as some sort of bible-thumping, gun toting nutjobs as the social dynamic underlying the abortion debate is shifting to the younger generations who are moderately more pro-life than pro-choice.
If the progressive movement in the United States is to attract that newer generation there must be some acknowledgement that well over 30% of the people you stand with on issues of Gay Marriage, Torture, Death Penalty and Poverty are Pro-Life on abortion.
We are sick of your hateful stereotypes.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» as one of many true longtime progressives
Posted by: goatini
» RE: as one of many true longtime progressives
Posted by: pelican beak
» RE: as one of many true longtime progressives
Posted by: Xynyx
» RE: as one of many true longtime progressives
Posted by: Ian MacLeod
» RE: as one of many true longtime progressives
Posted by: Ian MacLeod
» Maybe the anti-choice crowd who are progressive in other ways should rename themselves
Posted by: smadaj
» RE: Maybe the anti-choice crowd who are progressive in other ways should rename themselves
Posted by: Xynyx
» I agree that stereotyping does no good, and I think ...
Posted by: harryf200
» Just admit it...
Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» RE: Just admit it... Okay yes - I admit to caring about the rights of the foetus.
Posted by: harryf200
» Thank you
Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» But the sterotyping comes from pro-lifers
Posted by: nate
» They aren't "pro-lifers"
Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» RE: They aren't "pro-lifers"
Posted by: BPomeroy
» "Nobody ever gets an abortion as a "life style choice." " Really? Just about every woman ...
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: "Nobody ever gets an abortion as a "life style choice." " Really? Just about every woman ...
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE:well, I think ... you're an 'Merkaan idiot
Posted by: DaBear
» But I don't think it can be justified as a lifestyle choice.
Posted by: zizizzi
» Silly zizizzi!
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: Silly ideas
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: Silly ideas
Posted by: PopRox80
» RE: Silly zizizzi!
Posted by: MelStL
» RE: Silly zizizzi!
Posted by: MelStL
» How would you protect the rights of a fetus?
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: I agree that stereotyping does no good, and I think ...
Posted by: rinthy
» RE: As one of many progressive pro-lifers
Posted by: maxfrisson
» Good point, maxfrisson ...
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: progressive pro-lifers= oxy-moron
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: progressive pro-lifers= oxy-moron
Posted by: crashgrab
» No, we rightfully demonize murderous prolifers, and those who inflame the passions of . . .
Posted by: Beck
» Oh, are you now?
Posted by: Ms. DuFontagne
» Thanks for the hateful stereotype
Posted by: sliver
» And we are sick of you
Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» RE: And we are sick of you
Posted by: Quannah
» Too much violence and hate coming from the pro-lifers
Posted by: nate
» More on hypocrisy
Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» RE: As one of many progressive pro-lifers
Posted by: crashgrab
» Hey, Rakista, I have but one question for you:
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Morticia, Rakista is not progressive
Posted by: Silverhawk
» RE: Morticia, Rakista is not progressive
Posted by: morticia
» RE: As one of many progressive pro-lifers
Posted by: buschthebearrefreshing
» YO! rakista! Special "candygram" for you (and vasumurti)!
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Rakista doesn't care if breathing women die. No sancity there
Posted by: Silverhawk
» RE: Correction: [Sanctity (of life)]
Posted by: Silverhawk
» RE: As one of many progressive pro-lifers
Posted by: DaBear
» RE: As one of many progressive pro-lifers
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: Truth - Fact = Two different things
Posted by: Silverhawk
» RE: Randall "Father" Terry - Wheel conspiracy assassin?
Posted by: Silverhawk
» RE: As one of many progressive pro-lifers
Posted by: Brb007
» RE: Right on Brb007 for US Babylon facts. 'Father' Terry's truth's are not facts
Posted by: Silverhawk
» RE: As one of many
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: As one of many progressive pro-lifers
Posted by: Bibsisis
» I am staunchly pro-choice but agree with rakista
Posted by: realmuzik
» RE: I am not impressed
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: I am staunchly pro-choice but agree with rakista
Posted by: pelican beak
» RE: I am staunchly pro-choice but agree with rakista
Posted by: Seranvali
» I AM ANGRY THAT PRO-CHOICE PROGRESSIVES ARE SO FULL OF HATE!
Posted by: realmuzik
» RE: I AM ANGRY THAT PRO-CHOICE PROGRESSIVES ARE SO FULL OF HATE!
Posted by: MelStL
» RE: I AM ANGRY THAT PRO-CHOICE PROGRESSIVES ARE SO FULL OF HATE!
Posted by: pelican beak
» RE: I AM ANGRY THAT PRO-CHOICE PROGRESSIVES ARE SO FULL OF HATE!
Posted by: MelStL
» RE: I AM ANGRY THAT PRO-CHOICE PROGRESSIVES ARE SO FULL OF HATE!
Posted by: pelican beak
» RE: I AM ANGRY THAT PRO-CHOICE PROGRESSIVES ARE SO FULL OF HATE!
Posted by: MelStL
» RE: I AM ANGRY THAT PRO-CHOICE PROGRESSIVES ARE SO FULL OF HATE!
Posted by: pelican beak
» RE: I AM ANGRY THAT PRO-CHOICE PROGRESSIVES ARE SO FULL OF HATE!
Posted by: MelStL
» No problem
Posted by: pelican beak
» I'm angry that you're angry, now stop being angry. What?
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: I am staunchly pro-choice but agree with rakista
Posted by: morticia
» RE: I am staunchly pro-choice but agree with rakista
Posted by: pelican beak
» RE: I am staunchly pro-choice but agree with rakista
Posted by: morticia
» RE: I am staunchly pro-choice but agree with rakista
Posted by: pelican beak
» RE: I am staunchly pro-woman and that's where my choice comes from
Posted by: hagwind
» RE: I am staunchly pro-woman and that's where my choice comes from
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: I am staunchly pro-woman and that's where my choice comes from
Posted by: MelStL
» RE: I am staunchly pro-woman and that's where my choice comes from
Posted by: hagwind
» RE: I am staunchly pro-woman and that's where my choice comes from
Posted by: MelStL
» Thank you, MelStL
Posted by: hagwind
» RE: As one of many progressive pro-lifers
Posted by: smackley
» Pro-choice = right to dither 6+months over ...?
Posted by: Ligeia
» RE: Pro-choice = right to dither 6+months over ...?
Posted by: morticia
» First, Do NO Harm ...
Posted by: Ligeia
» RE: First, Do NO Harm ...
Posted by: Aimleft
» RE: First, Do NO Harm ...
Posted by: lively56
» RE: First, Do NO Harm ...
Posted by: MelStL
» RE: no harm done ...
Posted by: WyrdSister
» So, Ligeia.....
Posted by: morticia
» RE: First, Do NO Harm ...
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: such venom
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: Pro-choice = right to dither 6+months over ...?
Posted by: Seranvali
» I am psychologically well
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: As one of many progressive pro-lifers
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: As one of many progressive pro-lifers
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: As one of many progressive pro-lifers
Posted by: clvngodess
» Here is what I don't see you people asking. If your going to advocate hate against a group.....
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MotherLodeBeth on Jun 1, 2009 3:20 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fact is, late term abortions like he did, are simply not something one needs unless the woman's life is actually at risk and then even most non religious owned hospitals would do those.
This isn't pre 1970's when even birth control was illegal for married couples. Now we have so many forms of reliable birth control that there should be so few abortions. But we live in a do my own thing society, or a society who wants someone else to help bail us out of messes we get into.
So sorry, while I am pro-choice in the very early weeks of an UNintended pregnancy I cannot support the majority of late term abortions. And I say this as someone who has a child born with medical issues. And a baby that was lost pre birth.
~Beth~
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» another fact free post from a forced birther
Posted by: goatini
» RE: another fact free post from a forced birther
Posted by: MotherLodeBeth
» RE: another fact free post from a forced birther
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: I'm sorry for your loss, but the abortions Tiller performed were for women at risk
Posted by: smadaj
» RE: Karma....
Posted by: dimityrose
» There is a reason that it is legal
Posted by: sliver
» Oh, my Gawd, a subservient to authoritarian edicts... how funny.
Posted by: Prophit
» Run for the hills, Prophit, the doctors are coming!
Posted by: sliver
» Have you even bothered to read up on Kansas late-term abortion laws?
Posted by: Defenestrator
» RE: Karma....you don't know what you are talking about
Posted by: free2disagree
» Free2disagree, thank you for a wonderful post.
Posted by: hagwind
» Excellent post! (no further comment)
Posted by: Xynyx
» RE: Karma....you don't know what you are talking about
Posted by: MelStL
» RE: Karma....you don't know what you are talking about
Posted by: Seranvali
» Late term abortions save women's lives
Posted by: nate
» RE: Karma....
Posted by: BPomeroy
» RE: Karma....
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: Karma....
Posted by: amalahyrdaya
» RE: Karma....
Posted by: Quannah
» Yes, kill all those who would vote for anyone but Obama... a true test of whether you should....
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Yes, kill all those who would vote for anyone but Obama... a true test of whether you should....
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: Karma...what do you know about Karma?
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: Karma...what do you know about Karma?
Posted by: Seranvali
» Luckily, it isn't your choice
Posted by: bbq
» RE: Thank you bbq - Your sentiments are mine. Nobody's biz
Posted by: Silverhawk
» RE: Karma....
Posted by: Pegaleg
» RE: Karma....
Posted by: clvngodess
» RE: Karma....
Posted by: Bibsisis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: goatini on Jun 1, 2009 3:26 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: already two posts with hate speech in response
Posted by: rakista
» my Constitutionally guaranteed autonomy over my body
Posted by: goatini
» RE: my Constitutionally guaranteed autonomy over my body
Posted by: rakista
» female autonomy cannot wait
Posted by: goatini
» RE: female autonomy cannot wait
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: my Constitutionally guaranteed autonomy over my body
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: my Constitutionally guaranteed autonomy over my body
Posted by: Seranvali
» And how many of these babies do you plan to raise?
Posted by: bbq
» I think you take this too far ... and i am not a rabid pro lifers!
Posted by: harryf200
» rabid pro lifers!
Posted by: WyrdSister
» Sorry, but that is just b..... ks (pun intended) I'm not suggesting guys get off Scott Free.
Posted by: harryf200
» Pregnancy is not a "fault"
Posted by: nate
» You're kidding me - right?
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: Sorry, but that is just b..... ks (pun intended) I'm not suggesting guys get off Scott Free.
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: Sorry, but that is just b..... ks (pun intended) I'm not suggesting guys get off Scott Free.
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: Sorry, but that is just b..... ks (pun intended) I'm not suggesting guys get off Scott Free.
Posted by: left_witch
» RE: Sorry, but that is just b..... ks (pun intended) I'm not suggesting guys get off Scott Free.
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: Sorry, but that is just b..... ks (pun intended) I'm not suggesting guys get off Scott Free.
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: Sorry, but that is just b..... ks (pun intended) I'm not suggesting guys get off Scott Free.
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: Sorry, but that is just b..... ks (pun intended) I'm not suggesting guys get off Scott Free.
Posted by: Quannah
» What kind of idiot are you who would ....
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: What kind of idiot are you who would ....
Posted by: Quannah
» "Go fuck yourself" Well, rather with me than with you ...
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: What kind of idiot are you who would ....
Posted by: Brb007
» RE: What kind of idiot are you who would ....
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: What kind of idiot are you who would ....
Posted by: lively56
» RE: What kind of idiot are you who would ....
Posted by: MelStL
» RE: Sorry, but that is just b..... ks (pun intended) I'm not suggesting guys get off Scott Free.
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: I think you take this too far ... and i am not a rabid pro lifers!
Posted by: harryf200
» Thanks for the response
Posted by: Curio
» RE: Thanks for the response
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: Thanks for the response
Posted by: Curio
» RE: Thanks for the response
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: Thanks for the response
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: Thanks for the response
Posted by: Curio
» i am not a rabid pro lifers...no, your just arrogant
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: i am not a rabid pro lifers...no, your just arrogant
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: I think you take this too far ... and i am not a rabid pro lifers!
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: I think you take this too far ... and i am not a rabid pro lifers!
Posted by: Bibsisis
» Read Mandatory Motherhood by Garrett Hardin
Posted by: smadaj
» See, here's the problem, rakista:
Posted by: morticia
» RE: He Man Woman Hater Club member Grunts Again
Posted by: Purple Girl
» oh Purple Girl
Posted by: goatini
» It would seem that "ladies" is a term YOU value.
Posted by: Beck
» please see my response to Purple Girl
Posted by: goatini
» Gee, where's vasumurti?
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Gee, where's vasumurti?
Posted by: Xynyx
» goatini's a gal, and a good one!
Posted by: morticia
» RE: goatini's a gal, and a good one!
Posted by: goatini
» RE: already two posts with hate speech in response
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: already two posts with hate speech in response
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: already two posts with hate speech in response
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: already two posts with hate speech in response
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» I see way more than two posts with hate speech and its on both sides...
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: hate speech
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: already two posts with hate speech in response
Posted by: Bibsisis
» you misread my post
Posted by: goatini
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tony D on Jun 1, 2009 4:17 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The lesson here is that Christians are not ever supposed to kill because someone has a different opinion then they do.
They should arrest all the anti-abortion people who parade in front of the clinic and send them away to an insane asylum until they are cured. While they are at it they may as well send Bill O'Reiley with them.
Proof of the adage that: "their are good people and evil people in the world but to make a good person evil it takes religion."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Pro-life isn't just an issue for people whop are religious ...
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: Pro-life isn't just an issue for people whop are religious ...
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: Pro-life isn't just an issue for people whop are religious ...
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: Pro-life isn't just an issue for people whop are religious ...
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: Pro-life isn't just an issue for people whop are religious ...
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: Anthony D'Auria
Posted by: Bibsisis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cherylsass123 on Jun 1, 2009 5:06 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You are right that more birth control would reduce abortion, but no BC is 100% effective
Posted by: smadaj
» If you don't want the responsibility of bringing up a child, and ....
Posted by: harryf200
» Use condoms!
Posted by: nate
» Poor bloody excuse!
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: If you don't want the responsibility of bringing up a child, and ....
Posted by: crashgrab
» If you don't have the resources to bring up a baby, then ...
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: If you don't have the resources to bring up a baby, then ...
Posted by: Quannah
» Men don't need a dildo, silly.
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: Men don't need a dildo, silly.
Posted by: crashgrab
» Do you choose not to drive a car because you might injure or kill someone?
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: If you don't want the responsibility of bringing up a child, and ....
Posted by: crashgrab
» Really? Then be healthy with sex by masturbating. That's natural, too.
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: eally? Then be healthy with sex by masturbating. That's natural, too.
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: If you don't want the responsibility of being a progressive, don't claim to be one
Posted by: DaBear
» Actually, dude, I'm an athiest...
Posted by: harryf200
» If you're an atheist then you should learn how to spell it.
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: If you don't want the responsibility of bringing up a child, and ....
Posted by: Quannah
» Actually, I'd rather you didn't fuck me, Quannah - I'm sure you're not my type....
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: Actually, I'd rather you didn't fuck me, Quannah - I'm sure you're not my type....
Posted by: Quannah
» LOL!!! Thanks for the laugh, Quannah!!!
Posted by: harryf200
» Child-bearing isn't worthless
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: Child-bearing isn't worthless
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: Actually, I'd rather you didn't fuck me, Quannah - I'm sure you're not my type....
Posted by: Bibsisis
» Be lesbian or gay!
Posted by: hagwind
» RE: Be lesbian or gay!
Posted by: crashgrab
» Two Birth Control babies out of five children
Posted by: PrinceRobert
» RE: Two Birth Control babies out of five children
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: this is sickening
Posted by: crashgrab
» Most of the women who have late-term abortion...
Posted by: bbq
» RE: Most of the women who have late-term abortion...
Posted by: Seranvali
» Netherlands has huge Islamic population ...
Posted by: Ligeia
» RE: Netherlands has huge Islamic population ...
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Netherlands has huge Islamic population ...
Posted by: MelStL
» RE: Netherlands has huge Islamic population ...
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Netherlands has huge Islamic population ...
Posted by: crashgrab
» Women don't die in childbearth anymore?
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: Women don't die in childbearth anymore?
Posted by: morticia
» RE: this is sickening
Posted by: Seranvali
Comments are closed-
» RE: You get what you give
Posted by: kimpohl
» RE: You get what you give
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: You get what you give
Posted by: gilliani
» RE: You get what you give
Posted by: lyta
» I hope they are unbowed by the terrorists because ...
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: You get what you give-right back atcha
Posted by: WyrdSister
» "hate begets hate" Well, that's something we agree on, altho' ...
Posted by: harryf200
» They aren't "children"
Posted by: nate
» RE: You get what you give
Posted by: crashgrab
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bearzerker on Jun 1, 2009 8:25 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
or how many countries will need to be invaded to soothe the frantic news propagandists spewing hatred in the name of free speech!
religion is freaky in the US, but all i can say is that most peoples vision of heaven, is my vision of hell!
and people wonder why we loose faith...
in religion, politics, relationships etc
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DrBrian on Jun 2, 2009 12:25 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We must make a distinction between clear advocacy of criminal behavior and expression of opinions that might contribute to an unhinged person's taking it upon him- or herself to avenge perceived wrongdoing.
The First Amendment is essential to democracy and should allow for unhindered expression of opinions, even overheated or offensive ones, as long as they stop short of advocating crimes.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Whose Ox is Being Gored, and Does It Matter?
Posted by: lyta
» RE: Whose Ox is Being Gored, and Does It Matter?
Posted by: Amolibri
» RE: Whose Ox is Being Gored, and Does It Matter?
Posted by: DrBrian
» There is no DEMOCRACY here
Posted by: dimityrose
» Agree
Posted by: EncinoM
» The difference is: a man has been murdered
Posted by: nate
» Again you are giving away the 1st Amendment
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Again you are giving away the 1st Amendment
Posted by: DaBear
» RE: Again you are giving away the 1st Amendment
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Again you are giving away the 1st Amendment
Posted by: prorock
» Special Pleading, or Should We Just Abolish Free Speech for All?
Posted by: DrBrian
» RE: Agree
Posted by: Seranvali
Comments are closed-
Posted by: atheistcable on Jun 2, 2009 2:41 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When we register for classes, there is a blank on their form asking what our religion is or, as in my case, no religion. Members of Minnesota Atheists are heavily involved.
There are two leaders: Dr. Grant Steves, an atheist, who has a doctorate in theology, and the other leader is Chester Barber, a Christian who is also working on his doctorate in theology.
As people are coming into the room, the two leaders start assembling us in groups of 6 or 8. You will see both atheists and theists with bibles in their hands. The leaders make sure that we're as evenly divided as possible, theists and atheists. They hand us introductory literature and questionnaires we're to fill out so that we can give a verbal report at the end. We have scholars who come to our class and give a 30-minute presentation.
We talk about what a god is and compare that to gods of other cultures. We discuss belief, sins, morals, how and if the stories in the OT/NT are relevant to our lives (most are not), and where atheists and theists get their morals from.
I don't follow the rules exactly. Occasionally, I bring up topics such as abortion and gay marriage which, especially the abortion issue, engages the group.
All of us have fun. We never come close to having heated arguments. We define our words, we look to evidence, and if there is no evidence for a particular claim, we simply drop the issue. Sometimes people exchange email addresses and continue the discussion on their own time.
Here in the Twin Cities, there is no organized group where the public can gather, to talk about abortion--or the drug war. Many women who are members of Minnesota Atheists are interested in discussing abortion and I am working presently to organize a discussion group based on the SBS format. I wanted to do this some time ago, but the assassination of Dr. Tiller has given this project a boost.
Not all atheists are pro-Choice. I've met a few men who are disturbingly anti-Choice. My explanation is that individuals can rise above the god concept, but they bring with them many ghosts from their former religious life. A few heterosexual males are also uncomfortable around the few gays that are active in our organization. (Women always seem to be more emotionally well-adjusted than men.)
But Minnesota Atheists is an educational organization--and we work at that every day. You may visit our website to see what we do, pick up some ideas for your area, and read our newsletters going back to July 2002. Go to www.mnatheists.org
Every city has public spaces where citizens can assemble and sit in small circles to discuss these issues. On some levels, face-to-face communication is better than exchanging views on the Internet. It requires effort to sustain and advance democracy and peace. Education helps us overcome fear and arrogance.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Face-to-face discussion groups
Posted by: willymack
» RE: Face-to-face discussion groups
Posted by: hagwind
» RE: Face-to-face discussion groups
Posted by: masthead
» RE: Face-to-face discussion groups
Posted by: hagwind
Comments are closed-
Posted by: thedigitalfrenzy on Jun 2, 2009 4:15 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You're right, there are too many people fcuking...
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: You're right, there are too many people fcuking...
Posted by: Curio
» Nope, Curio - that's not my argument, it's that...
Posted by: harryf200
» Actually, you've made that argument abundantly clear
Posted by: Curio
» RE: The thing I have trouble with is...
Posted by: clvngodess
» RE: The thing I have trouble with is...
Posted by: Bibsisis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Moonray on Jun 2, 2009 4:30 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To achieve any real progress the Constitution must be rewritten to empower genuinely progressive groups and get away from the current pseudo-democracy model. Getting that done would be very difficult, but obviously nothing else will work. Our great hope -- Barack Obama -- is turning out to be Hillary Clinton in disguise. And Hillary Clinton is just Bush 41 in drag.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: vioibi on Jun 2, 2009 5:11 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Late-term abortions
Posted by: harryf200
» Then do it in YOUR life
Posted by: PrinceRobert
» RE: Then do it in YOUR life? So, who is going to guard the rights of the foetus?
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: Then do it in YOUR life? So, who is going to guard the rights of the foetus?
Posted by: left_witch
» "what rights does a fetus have?" At least as much as a kitten has from cruel treatment..
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: "what rights does a fetus have?" At least as much as a kitten has from cruel treatment..
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: "what rights does a fetus have?" At least as much as a kitten has from cruel treatment..
Posted by: hagwind
» RE: "what rights does a fetus have?" At least as much as a kitten has from cruel treatment..
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: "what rights does a fetus have?" At least as much as a kitten has from cruel treatment..
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: Then do it in YOUR life? So, who is going to guard the rights of the foetus?
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: forced birth
Posted by: WyrdSister
» You miss the point... I don't want to punish anyone or force my morals ...
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: You miss the point... I don't want to punish anyone or force my morals ...
Posted by: left_witch
» No, rights are RATIFIED by the State in legislature, as in ...
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: You miss the point... I don't want to punish anyone or force my morals ...
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: You miss the point... I don't want to punish anyone or force my morals ...
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: Late-term abortions
Posted by: gilliani
» Where is your statement about men using condoms?
Posted by: nate
» Quite agree - it's the man's responsibility as much as the woman's to avoid unwanted pregnancies
Posted by: harryf200
» harryf200 does not endorse condom use
Posted by: BlueTigress
» RE: Where is your statement about men using condoms?
Posted by: crashgrab
» Accepting responsibility...
Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» You don't think the foetus has rights, then?
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: You don't think the foetus has rights, then?
Posted by: left_witch
» See previous post. Human Rights exist before legislation ratifies them. Think about it ...
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: You don't think the foetus has rights, then?
Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» A fetus under 24 weeks can't feel pain
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: You don't think the foetus has rights, then?
Posted by: Seranvali
» OK, say the f(o)etus does have rights . . .
Posted by: hagwind
» RE: oh dude, give it UP!
Posted by: DaBear
» RE: oh dude, were you dragged up by morons or do you pratice being prat?
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: oh dude, were you dragged up by morons or do you pratice being prat?
Posted by: crashgrab
» He can't spell atheist
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: Late-term abortions
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: Randall Terry's God Squad has the right under DHS
Posted by: Silverhawk
» Hold State Referenda; All 50 would demand restrictions
Posted by: Ligeia
» If this doesn't take the almighty cake:
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Hold State Referenda; All 50 would demand restrictions
Posted by: crashgrab
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jun 2, 2009 5:12 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Beyond that, it is an awfully tacky example of disaster capitalization.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Elaborate, please.
Posted by: Curio
» RE: Punish the criminal who did it.
Posted by: BPomeroy
» RE: Punish the criminals plural. You have to include R Terry
Posted by: Silverhawk
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kiel on Jun 2, 2009 5:41 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Domestic terrorists
Posted by: lyta
» It's this kind of terrorism that gives Christianity a bad name, and driving away
Posted by: avidAmerican
» RE: Assassins by way of intimidation or eveyone is a terrorist
Posted by: Silverhawk
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Purple Girl on Jun 2, 2009 6:32 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One who recognizes his part in the process of prodcuing a pregnancy.
One who recognizes the fact that it is also his responsilbity to avoid it considering our finacial circumstances
Realized the methods afford Women as birth control carry far more dangerous side effects than a mere Condom to men.
Realized that if the issue aroses it is still my choice, because it will be my body, by health, my life that could be adversely effected.Prefers I be around to spend the rest of his life with.
Recognizes that it is not just girls who must be educated on sexual responsiblity but also the boys.
So instead of endangering my life by resorting to birth control pills or the same risks associated with 'Plan B', My Husband has owned up to his Responsiblity with a vesectomy.He was also always diligent about paying his child support to his Ex. That's what REAL men do.
If we are to have a real conversation about Unwanted pregnancies- those Testicles had better be on the table too.We woman are not getting pregnant by dancing alone between those sheets boys!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Real Men
Posted by: m/r
» And who wears the pants in your family?
Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: how sexist is THAT question
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: And who wears the pants in your family?
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: eal Men
Posted by: Seranvali
Comments are closed-
Posted by: avidAmerican on Jun 2, 2009 6:35 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Support of gun-toting Hitler types who think it is okay to kill anyone they
Posted by: Dboy
» Hitler types?!?!
Posted by: countingdaisies
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxfrisson on Jun 2, 2009 6:38 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What if this were possible, live extraction and out-of-womb maintenance?
Would Randy Terry and The Pope take them to protect? What if the womb wasn't the problem? What if I could transplant one on Terry's abdomen? Take a sip of coffee and enjoy that image for a minute.... ahhhhhhhh!
Back to our regularly scheduled sarcasm....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Frank Zappa lives. What's your phone number Frank?
Posted by: Silverhawk
» Yes, I've seen something similar to that!
Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: The Sci Fi Solution? I want to know what if....
Posted by: crashgrab
Comments are closed-
Posted by: WyrdSister on Jun 2, 2009 6:46 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Absolutely, they are pro-death, and want to make decisions for other people's bodies,
Posted by: avidAmerican
» They are women-killers,
Posted by: Ms. DuFontagne
» RE: They are women-killers,
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: Tell it Sister. And proud doctor assassins as well
Posted by: Silverhawk
» RE: can we FINALLY
Posted by: rickiey
» RE: can we FINALLY
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: can we FINALLY
Posted by: rickiey
» RE: can we FINALLY
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: can we FINALLY
Posted by: rickiey
» Who rules?
Posted by: BlueTigress
» RE: can we FINALLY
Posted by: Jayzer
» RE: "Right to Lie" movement
Posted by: WyrdSister
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dazzle59 on Jun 2, 2009 7:19 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of Rachel's guests last night was a female physician who still performs abortions. She strongly urged all women who have had the procedure to stand up and support the few remaining doctors brave enough to provide it. Thirty-five percent of women of reproductive age in the U.S. have had an abortion. I am one of those women, and I am willing and ready to take a stand against these anti-choice lunatics!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ANTI-ABORTION TERRORISM IS WORKING!
Posted by: WyrdSister
» I love the Babylon sister here! Stand up now women and men
Posted by: Silverhawk
» Oh, abortion is always available everywhere.....
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Back alley abortions kill women. Is this what you want again in the US?
Posted by: Silverhawk
» RE: Back alley abortions kill women. Is this what you want again in the US?
Posted by: morticia
» RE: A chilling statistic
Posted by: Caleb Darkstar
» Access
Posted by: BlueTigress
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CatDad on Jun 2, 2009 7:28 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
- The GOP has learned that they can pacify these duped "culture of life" people with peripheral victories: banning partial birth abortions, banning abortions in military hospitals, Terry Schiavo, banning stem cell research..the list goes on and one...WHILE keeping general legal access to abortion the law of the land.
- The GOP has tricked Pro-Lifers into believing that overturning Roe v. Wade is some sort of magical event that would be a final victory. Overturning Roe. v. Wade would simply throw the issue of abortion right back to the states, as it existed in 1973.
- Banning abortion would be as effective as our anti-marijuana laws have been to stop kids from smoking post...ask M. Phelps
- The REAL way to limit abortions would be to decrease the need for them by creating an equitable society: universal health care, living wages. Abortion rates in the Netherlands are very low.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Tell it Cat Dad. Prostitution isn't stopping where it's illegal either.
Posted by: Silverhawk
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weslen1 on Jun 2, 2009 7:43 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need to CLASSIFY this as a HATE CRIME, as it is and start MONITORING all these Fanatics 24/7 so none of them will EVER get the chance to kill another INNOCENT simply for disagreeing with THEIR twisted belief that GOD CHOSE THEM TO DO HIS WORK because, of course GOD, THE ALL POWERFUL, is not CAPABLE OF DOING HIS OWN WORK AND JESUS WOULDN'T HAVE HAD THE GUTS, because HE was a PEACE MONGER, "OH MY". And if we don't have enough MAN POWER to monitor them then all of these TERRORISTS belong in a cell the FIRST time they even HINT at their craziness. Put them all in straight jackets or send THEM to Gitmo because THEY are the ones who BELONG THERE.
The same thing goes for Child Molesters. LOCK THEM UP FOREVER. Put a stop to it.
RAPISTS! Lock them UP forever. There will be fewer abortions if there are NO rapists.
We DO have the RIGHT to LOCK UP people who are a DANGER to themselves AND/OR to OTHERS. And these FANATICS who believe they have GODS POWER to POLICE THE WORLD are certainly dangerous to ALL of US. LOCK THEM UP!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Right, these are people who cannot mind their own business
Posted by: PrinceRobert
» RE: First and Foremost
Posted by: AnIndependentThinker
» RE: Assassins. Randall "Father" Terry style
Posted by: Silverhawk
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AnIndependentThinker on Jun 2, 2009 7:48 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Human civilization has lived and continues to live under an umbrella of "justifiable" vengeance. If one man can find "justification" in a criminal act (including the murder of a doctor, who was simply doing his legal job), then his supporters will defend him to the ends of the earth. "Justifiable" does not always equate to justice or equality, however.
The problem with these United States is that our mindset is not that of a superior nation, but that of a third-world country, where we believe that taking the life of one will serve justice in the name of justice; regardless of circumstance.
Until we understand the concept that killing is NOT acceptable in ANY circumstance for living, thinking, breathing, human beings* (and animals)-- we cannot transform the minds of those who have been taught to think otherwise. (*Standard for living, thinking, breathing human beings is OUTSIDE the woman's womb.)
As a woman, I believe that women should have a choice to do with their bodies what they choose to do. I would personally not have an abortion, but I have absolutely NO right to judge what others do with their physical bodies. I would certainly not tell a set of parents that they could not get a heart transplant for their dying child because it is not morally ethical to take the still-beating heart from a dying child to give to another.
I have two healthy, young-adult children whom I wouldn't trade for the world. And while I may not always understand why some women would have an abortion, it is not my place to understand; nor to make that decision for her.
Now, onto the sociological dilemma and irony of these United States... Our countrymen don't like war, but we believe in killing others to set an example. Our citizens don't tolerate murder, but we demand electrocution or lethal injection of those murderers once caught (nevermind the trial by jury). Our govt. demands responsible parenting, but we simply shake our heads when under-educated and neglectful parents maim or kill their offspring. Our citizens scream "murder" when a doctor carries out a LEGAL abortion, but find personal satisfaction and "justice" in the killing of that physician. Our citizens reject and neglect people with severe mental disabilities or physical abnormalities; but would rather have a child born into this world with those severities. Our citizens don't want to pay the high cost of health care premiums, but scream "injustice" and "murder" when a plug is pulled on a brain-dead patient. We can't have it both ways. Somewhere between sanity and insanity is a happy medium. There will always be arguments about what or who came first, "the chicken or the egg;" but that's not going to solve the sociological dilemma. Fact of the matter is, killing in the name of perceived justice is never just...it's insanity.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: eligion sets the stage...for all things, including murder
Posted by: zeek2
» RE: eligion sets the stage...for all things, including murder
Posted by: AnIndependentThinker
» RE: eligion sets the stage...for all things, including murder
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: eligion sets the stage...for all things, including murder
Posted by: AnIndependentThinker
» RE: eligion sets the stage...for all things, including murder
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: eligion sets the stage...for all things, including murder
Posted by: Seranvali
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars on Jun 2, 2009 8:07 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I will not shut up even when I'm placed in that casket, like Pac. Life must be protected if not what have we become as a society
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: IP Dr Barnett Slepian
Posted by: zeek2
Comments are closed-
Posted by: clainehart on Jun 2, 2009 8:10 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My concern is the psychological motivation of what attracts people to this "movement."
Like all "political killers," Dr. Tiller's murderer was most likely psychotic and wrestling with very deep, personal psychological demons that absolutely nothing to do with "abortion" at all. Killing in the name of "justice" was an excuse to kill, period.
As for the other "pro-lifers," in typical peasant fashion, it's misplaced anger, as usual.
Commenters are right: We do have two Americas now. The gap between the rich and poor is pretty much horrific at this point.
Alternet represents the intelligentsia. It does not represent "the other half": Millions of nominal "serfs" who've been beaten down by decades of anti-labor, inhumane economic policies; crumbling schools; and nonexistent health care.
People in this country have a right to be angry. There is a lot to be angry about. The difference between America today and, say, the peasant rebellions of the 18th and 19th centuries is that here no one understands what they're really angry about. It's the economy, stupid!
Abortion is a nice, neat, black-and-white issue for simple-minded people to get their heads around. It's not their fault: Their religion has stamped out their critical thinking; their schools have completely failed them; and their brains are literally diseased from all the television they watch and the wretched food they eat.
They can't understand their miserable economic condition. But they can understand boys kissing and women bleeding.
I understand the motivation. But I don't understand what to do about it. With every passing administration, we seem to get more and more divided - further and further from any kind of equitable society. We invent all kinds of B.S. artificial divisions - race, religion, sexual orientation - but it's really all about the disparity between the rich and the poor.
Now, what are we going to do about it? Are we just going to let ourselves turn into a full-fledged third world country, where poverty is dismissed as "just the way things are"?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sausage on Jun 2, 2009 8:53 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By Jason Hancock 6/1/09 4:09 PM
The suspect in the fatal shooting of late-term abortion doctor George Tiller in Kansas was an occasional contributor to a Des Moines-based newsletter that believes that killing abortion providers is justifiable homicide.
Des Moines resident and anti-abortion activist Dave Leach publishes the newsletter, called “Prayer & Action News,” which describes itself as “a trumpet call for the Armies of God to assemble.” In an interview with The Washington Post, Leach said not only has he published the writings of alleged gunman Scott Roeder in the past, but he visited him in Kansas several years ago on his way back from speaking with Rachelle “Shelley” Shannon in prison. Shannon was convicted in 1993 of shooting Tiller outside his clinic. She later confessed to setting fires at abortion clinics in Oregon, California, Idaho and Nevada.
“Indeed, ‘taking the law into your own hands,’ as the idiom goes, is morally, legally, and spiritually dangerous territory,” he said. “But to say it is never right or legal is ignorance of our own laws. Every state has some version of the Necessity Defense, which says if you break a law to save a life, it’s not a crime. Taking dozens of lives by the cruelest devices, from burning to death in acid, to dismemberment, to Dr. Tiller’s scissors in a baby’s brain, as a single day’s work for any abortionist.”
Iowa Independent.com
Indeed, "having the conscience of a hard dick," as the idiom goes, is morally, legally, and spiritually dangerous territory.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Thanks for the background history all be it TWISTED
Posted by: Silverhawk
» RE: Posted at Iowa Independent
Posted by: crashgrab
Comments are closed-
Posted by: WhuThe?!? on Jun 2, 2009 9:13 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I grew up, I constantly heard my parents referring to those that worked at Planned Parenthood as "baby killers", and also heard them constantly refer to the March of Dimes as "baby-killers" as well because I believe they support abortion of highly retarded fetuses. Anyway, anybody who believed in choice and/or realized laws are ineffective were referred to as "baby-killers".
No doubt, this kind of rhetoric is common amongst these people, and it doesn't surprise me that, after hearing this kind of talk, many start believing it and think that murder is the right thing to do. I have no doubt this is not the last time we will hear of this.
I'm sure few "pro-lifers" will admit it, but I grew up around their mentality, listed to their meetings and commentary, and have no doubt that a major percentage of them were happy to hear that the doctor was murdered. To them, one last "baby-killer".
Poor angry, sexually oppressed and frustrated, mean spirited, pathetic fools.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Jun 2, 2009 12:49 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe it.
That settles it!
Indeed. And when coming from a group of emotional illiterates who committed cultural theft and rewrote the victims' books to mean things they never meant, it gets a whole lot worse. That's the abject danger of "the Bible says..." and it's always used by Xtians who committed cultural theft.
It also needs to be said that there are MANY women for whom the abortion procedure is NOT and was NOT traumatic or even problematic. It's very telling that in this violent, savage cultural-political climate these womens' voices--those that were not traumatized by abortion--are silent or remain unheard, even by their well-intentioned but myopic sisters (and brothers).
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Quannah on Jun 2, 2009 1:19 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THEY ARE PRO-FETUS.
And they could give a fuck about any child once it's born.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on Jun 2, 2009 3:30 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The criteria here, after all, is only that of age. When the next political movement comes along, how safe is the right to life for any of us - the elderly, for instance.
I wondered elsewhere here why no one has mentioned another doctor - Dr. Jack Kevorkian.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: There are over 500 cases of women killing their child every year yet I hear about one
Posted by: Silverhawk
» RE: THE SIMPLE TRUTH IS THIS:
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: THE SIMPLE TRUTH IS THIS:
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: THE SIMPLE TRUTH IS THIS:
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: THE SIMPLE TRUTH IS THIS:
Posted by: Seranvali
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Jun 2, 2009 9:57 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zim340 on Jun 2, 2009 9:59 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dr. Tiller was killed by an "anti-abortionist" not a "pro-lifer!"
If all these so-called, self-righteous pro-lifers were really concerned about life, they would be protesting against the Iraq war, the death penalty, and so many other inhumane actions that deprive the already born the right to life.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MeyravLevine on Jun 2, 2009 10:01 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Their core belief is that life begins at conception. Yes, some of them may even think that life begins once the fetus reaches "viability", but the majority of them believe that abortion at any stage is wrong.
One only needs to look at the legal history of Roe v. Wade to realize that the rligious crowd won't stop at banning late-term abortion or the morning-after pills.
They'll go after contraceptions and beyond. They don't believe in individual's right to reproductive health and right to privacy.
As I noted in my exchanges with some of the more honest of the anti-women crowd, they believe the "right" of a fetus trumps that of a women, even when the pregnancy results from rape/incest.
They fundamentalists will only be satisfied when we are completely stripped off our right to privacy and health.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Rape? Because it's the priest/preacher that's protected
Posted by: Silverhawk
» RE: Debate is useless - Anti-women brigade is driven by the god delusion
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: Debate is useless - Anti-women brigade is driven by the god delusion
Posted by: Bibsisis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: raginghormones on Jun 2, 2009 10:05 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: the "Progressive" Pro-life (anti-choice) comments on this article..some thoughts
Posted by: august hinton
» RE: the "Progressive" Pro-life (anti-choice) comments on this article..some thoughts
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: the "Progressive" Pro-life (anti-choice) comments on this article..some thoughts
Posted by: cmaciain
» RE: august hinton's bizarre pretzel logic world
Posted by: free2disagree
» RE: Circular non-logic: Pro choice killed Dr Tiller? Wrong again!
Posted by: Silverhawk
» RE: August Hinton, Randall "Father" Terry assassinated Dr T
Posted by: Silverhawk
» RE: the "Progressive" Pro-life (anti-choice) comments on this article..some thoughts
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: the "Progressive" Pro-life (anti-choice) comments on this article..some thoughts
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: the "Progressive" Pro-life (anti-choice) comments on this article..some thoughts
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bettyn on Jun 2, 2009 10:57 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At the very least, the Tiller family should be able to sue the pants off Rupert and his bunch.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: It seems to me
Posted by: rickiey
» RE: It seems to me
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: It seems to me
Posted by: rickiey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: US Citizen on Jun 2, 2009 11:14 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Putting and Keeping All Women in their Lowly Place
Posted by: sureshot45
» Proof that this is true
Posted by: Ms. DuFontagne
» RE: Putting and Keeping All Women in their Lowly Place
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: Putting and Keeping All Women in their Lowly Place
Posted by: prorock
» RE: Putting and Keeping All Women in their Lowly Place
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: Mysonginist hyperbole. Just what the bigamist ordered
Posted by: Silverhawk
» RE: Putting and Keeping All Women in their Lowly Place
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: Putting and Keeping All Women in their Lowly Place
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: Putting and Keeping All Women in their Lowly Place
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: Putting and Keeping All Women in their Lowly Place
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: Putting and Keeping All Women in their Lowly Place
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» You seem to have a problem with context
Posted by: mjglow
» RE: You seem to have a problem with context
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: You seem to have a problem with context
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: You seem to have a problem with context
Posted by: rickiey
» Misogyny keeps women safe from misogyny. What?
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: Putting and Keeping All Women in their Lowly Place
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: Putting and Keeping All Women in their Lowly Place
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: Putting and Keeping All Women in their Lowly Place
Posted by: Bibsisis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sureshot45 on Jun 2, 2009 11:36 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fascists are some heavy dudes
They don't really give a damn about life
They just don't want a woman to
Control her body or have the right to choose
But baby that ain't nothin
They just want a male finger on the button
Because if you say war they will send them to die by the score
or..they will just blow up clinics and shoot doctors and patients. that gets the message across that they are pro life.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: interesting..its always the same
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: interesting..its always the same
Posted by: sureshot45
» RE: interesting..its always the same
Posted by: Bibsisis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on Jun 2, 2009 3:12 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We keep playing word games, building a reality that is only verbal definition. To pretend that because the Supreme Court ruled that federal and state governments could not prosecute one specific kind of killing in no way changes the reality of what it is, and the human race has long - since before the Ten Commandments - had an abhorence of murder.
To put it another way, when you kill someone you're going to piss somebody off. One of the oldest legal principles is that of voluntas non fit injuria - one who does something knowing the risks has no claim of having been injured when what he risked happens.
Killing is killing, and whether the courts say it is murder or not, killing begets killing. Any damned fool who believes a ruling by a panel of nefariously neurotic nitwits like our Supreme Court can change thousands of years of behavior is as big a nitwit as they are.
And by the way, why has nobody (but me) mentioned Doctor Jack Kavorkian - hmmmmm?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» please walks-in-storms could you just take a walk ...
Posted by: prorock
» RE: please walks-in-storms could you just take a walk ...
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: So the liberal media begins doing what it says O'Reilly did . . .?
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: There is no liberal media except MSMBC, Amy Goodman, and Air America
Posted by: Silverhawk
» RE: There is no liberal media except MSMBC, Amy Goodman, and Air America
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: There is no liberal media except MSMBC, Amy Goodman, and Air America
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: So the liberal media begins doing what it says O'Reilly did . . .?
Posted by: Seranvali
Comments are closed-
Posted by: harryf200 on Jun 2, 2009 5:46 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Ok, hands up all those who give a sh#t about the rights of the foetus?
Posted by: Bibsisis
» And herein lays the nub of the argument from my POV:
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: POVs- that's all they are...
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: And herein lays the nub of the argument from my POV:
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: And herein lays the nub of the argument from my POV:
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: And herein lays the nub of the argument from my POV:
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: And herein lays the nub of the argument from my POV:
Posted by: Bibsisis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: abusedbypenguins on Jun 2, 2009 5:48 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why was abortion made illegal in the first place?
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: Why was abortion made illegal in the first place?
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Thank you for the background morticia! Lovin the facts.
Posted by: Silverhawk
» RE: Thank you for the background morticia! Lovin the facts.
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Why was abortion made illegal in the first place?
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: Why was abortion made illegal in the first place?
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Why was abortion made illegal in the first place?
Posted by: Seranvali
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leethompson on Jun 2, 2009 7:04 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think this quote from Sunsara Taylor gets right to the heart of the matter.
You can read more from her article, "The Deadly Illusion of 'Common Ground' on Abortion - Response to Obama’s speech at Notre Dame on common ground and abortion"
You can read the whole article at http://www.revcom.us/a/166/ST_on_Obama-en.html
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: There is no "Common Ground"
Posted by: morticia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bibsisis on Jun 2, 2009 7:04 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sometimes, a woman wants no more children and wants her husband/lover to have a vasectomy so birth control is not just hers; in those cases, if the man prefers not to, that is HIS choice, and he should not be harangued to have one. Of course, this often leads to no more sex withing marriage and sometimes divorce.
These are complex questions, but no doctor should be murdered for doing what women are protected from UNDER the law!
This is a woman's issue, not political, not religious, not moral, nor immoral. It concerns the right of a woman over her own body to do with as she will--as if men don't! The government nor religion have no place in the debate except to keep abortion/choice legal or illegal ones will continue as since humans figured out what caused pregnancy. No courts, no pro-lifers, ugh, what an ugly term, nor any pro-choicers had a sayso. As it should be.
It has all come from the Xian rightwingnutneocons, as if they and their daughters haven't had more abortions--and more divorces, incest, rape, and infanticide, homicide, patricide, fratricide, than any other group.
In this country, yes, the good ol' USA, abortion happened all the time during the settling of the colonies with nary a law against it, even by the damn Puritans who stoned people to death for being witches. What the people who preach like O'Reilly and Limbaugh is hatred--not included in free speech. I blame them and Fox (faux) news for much of the violence, racial, political, abortion, suicide, and murder for their inciting broadcasts daily to the mostly uneducated viewers. It's called "inciting to riot," and murder is its end.
Shame on all of them and all of you who somehow think Dr. Tiller who practiced medicine WITHIN THE LAW OF THIS COUNTRY who is now a martyr for his enlightened view that it was HIS job to protect the rights of women.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Abortion is NOT a moral issue...
Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: Abortion is NOT a moral issue...
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: Abortion is NOT a moral issue...
Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: Abortion is NOT a moral issue...
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: Abortion is NOT a moral issue...
Posted by: Bibsisis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lilly on Jun 2, 2009 7:38 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's as if they constantly say bread, meat, mayo, mustard, pickles, buns, lettuce, panini grill but if anybody puts this together and says "you are suggesting a sandwich" they get all coy and offended and hide like little girls who got caught teasing the cat.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lilly on Jun 2, 2009 7:43 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Dead Fetus is directly form Randall "Father" Terry's assassination trolls
Posted by: Silverhawk
» RE: The Dead Fetus
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: The Dead Fetus
Posted by: smackley
» And the Dead Fetus Can Kill the Mother
Posted by: dudelette
» RE: The Dead Fetus
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: The Dead Fetus
Posted by: Bibsisis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pursah on Jun 2, 2009 7:55 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: allen, when everyone is a terrorist you and I will be as well
Posted by: Silverhawk
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PaulK on Jun 2, 2009 8:02 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that a couple of cells are a baby if the mother and father think it's a baby, and that it's a couple of cells if they don't. So, the whole difference is what people think.
Now, about the organized murder racket: I remember that not too many years ago, the Irish Republican Army shook the tin can in America to get contributions for weapons. These were Irish Roman Catholics and murderers of people too. Some people contributed so that Ireland would be one country on one island. Some said no, they didn't believe in that war. Eventually people made peace in Northern Ireland.
I see a trace of an organized murder racket in the abortion foes. Good Catholics and good Evangelicals don't want to go around whacking people like a drug cartel, but maybe with a few murders the others would be cowed and victory would be grasped. So there are maybe a few million Catholics and Evangelicals on the borderline, not sure if they want this bloodstain, but each contributing in their own way, some with money, some asking that they not know where the money went, some with a kind word. After one doctor in Florida was murdered, the guy who did it went back to the abortion foe picket line and they all held a prayer circle. Their group action said to me, "We are one in the Spirit, and the guy that one of us just whacked isn't!"
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» a couple of cells aren't a baby, and you're flat-out wrong
Posted by: hurricane hugo
» Ahem, did you read what I wrote?
Posted by: PaulK
» RE:"partial birth" is not a procedure
Posted by: WyrdSister
» Partial birth or late-term abortion, it's the same thing.
Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: it's not a medical procedure
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: Partial birth or late-term abortion, it's the same thing.
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: The red stain on the church floor
Posted by: Bibsisis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: crashgrab on Jun 3, 2009 2:19 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Harry, what's your reasoning for being anti-abortion? Do you feel abortion is murder? I ask these questions for the following reason...
Do you have such awfully strong opinions about other accidental events:
Do you never drive a car because you might accidentally injure or kill someone? If it's not ok to have sex because one might get pregnant (and shouldn't have an abortion), then why is it ok to drive even though we might injure or kill someone. By the way, last time I checked there were way more car accidents than abortions.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» So, an abortion is an accident?
Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: So, an abortion is an accident?
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: So, an abortion is an accident?
Posted by: Bibsisis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: crashgrab on Jun 3, 2009 2:45 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's an Orwellian version of what would happen in a society run by Harryf200:
How do we know that a woman is pregnant and a fetus needs to be protected?
Women would have to go in for monthly government check ups to see if they're pregnant.
Once we know a woman is pregnant, how do we keep the fetus safe?
We impose a different set of laws on pregnant women telling them activities and substances they can and can't be in contact with.
What if they woman won't pay heed to such restrictions?
We put her under house arrest or lock her up to keep her from harming the fetus.
What if she harms the fetus, let's say it dies, doing one of these activities/substances (and by the way who gets to decide what activities/substances are on that list) even in the early stage of pregnancy like 7 weeks?
She is put on trial for murder just like someone who bludgeons their wife. Oh yeah, and doctors would be put on trial for murder too if they provide abortions.
If you think this couldn't happen check out other societies who don't respect reproductive rights and see what happens to women.
What happens to the birth control pill?
Since there isn't much scientific proof for or against the possibility of an embryo being able to come into being and then lost before four weeks. The birth control pill and other medicines that work like it are outlawed. Women who are found using them are committing the crime of murder and sent to jail.
Don't think this would happen, check out the other societies that don't respect reproductive rights and then see how they treat women. Most of the societies that don't respect reproductive rights are third world country and kill women for all sorts of nasty undemocratic reasons. In the ones that are more modern, like Brazil, I've read of women going to jail for using certain types of medicines that might be abortifacients.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Harryf200's Orwellian Society
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Harryf200's Orwellian Society
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: Harryf200's Orwellian Society
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Harryf200's Orwellian Society
Posted by: goatini
» RE: Harryf200's Orwellian Society
Posted by: Seranvali
Comments are closed-
Posted by: countingdaisies on Jun 3, 2009 2:58 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Women's rights above all others . . .
Posted by: crashgrab
» How would you protect the rights of the fetus?
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: Women's rights above all others . . .
Posted by: Jayzer
» RE: Women's rights above all others . . .yup!
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: Women's rights above all others . . .yup!
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: Women's rights above all others . . .
Posted by: Seranvali
Comments are closed-
Posted by: blschneider on Jun 3, 2009 9:52 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm pro-choice, but late-term partial-birth abortions are truly murder.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Tiller did not perform ordinary abortions
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: Tiller did not perform ordinary abortions
Posted by: blschneider
» RE: Tiller did not perform ordinary abortions
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: Tiller did not perform ordinary abortions
Posted by: blschneider
» There is no such thing as a "partial birth abortion"
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: Tiller did not perform ordinary abortions
Posted by: Bibsisis
» I doubt it was factual if that's what you believe
Posted by: dudelette
» RE: I doubt it was factual if that's what you believe
Posted by: blschneider
» Twisted Sister doesn't use reason or logic.
Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: Twisted Sister doesn't use reason or logic.
Posted by: blschneider
» RE: Twisted Sister doesn't use reason or logic.
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: reason and logic not emotion and hyperbole
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: Twisted Sister doesn't use reason or logic.
Posted by: crashgrab
» I call bull****
Posted by: dudelette
» RE: I call bull****
Posted by: dazzle59
» RE: I doubt it was factual if that's what you believe
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: I doubt it was factual if that's what you believe
Posted by: blschneider
» RE: I doubt it was factual if that's what you believe
Posted by: crashgrab
» It's the Anti-Choice people who prevent using anesthesia
Posted by: dudelette
» RE: It's the Anti-Choice people who prevent using anesthesia
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: Tiller did not perform ordinary abortions
Posted by: Seranvali
» There is no such thing as a "partial birth abortion"
Posted by: crashgrab
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jayzer on Jun 3, 2009 9:53 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is long past time that Operation Rescue be investigated under the RICO statutes.
It is also long past time that women's health providers, including physicians who provide abortions, be provided with armed guards and NOT merely bullet-proof vests.
It is long past time that if the US Federal Government and various state agencies will not make any moves to protect women and their health care providers from the armed fanatics, that folks in the movement begin to arm themselves.
Non-violence is a fine ideal, but it stops making sense when survival is at stake. Allowing ourselves and our allies to be slaughtered is stupid, reckless and irresponsible.
If the fascist right wingers want to fight, then let's prepare to beat them!
Finally, it is long past time to say loud and clear: DEFEND A WOMAN'S RIGHT TO CHOOSE!
To Randall Terry and his ilk: You have killed your last abortion provider with impunity!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yes!
Posted by: dudelette
» RE: It is Long Past Time...
Posted by: Seranvali
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Kym525 on Jun 3, 2009 9:56 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What you all fail to realize is that should you somehow manage to make abortion illegal, your actions will do NOTHING to stop a desparate woman from seeking one. And if we're talking about class or race, rich women will always be able to secure one from either a trusted and safe medical facility (on the hush) or travel to another country. Poor women will simply have to take their chances with pregnancy or a back-alley procedure that will endanger their lives.
This is a short list of the problems I have with this movement:
1) You don't believe in birth control;
2) You don't believe in age-appropriate, comprehensive sex education--which INCLUDES abstinence--something even famous single-mom Bristol Palin says is unreasonable;
3) You don't believe in allowing single parents and gay and lesbian parents to adopt--why not if children need loving and stable homes;
4) You don't believe in cross-cultural/transracial adoptions--don't even get me started;
5) You believe in the death penalty; just ask Ann Coulter;
6) You are against social services that assist women and children - most of the strident pro-lifers are against welfare and a decent minimum wage;
7) You are against decent and equal access to health care--your talking heads are looking to battle Obama on health care for all;
8) You are against equal access to education
9) You care nothing for the tough decision a woman has to make and show no compassion for her, regardless of whatever reason she may choose to end a pregnancy
10) You believe in punishing the victims of rape or incest by forcing them to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term
Pick and choose from the list, but the bottom line is that the so-called "pro-life' movement is everything BUT that. If there are ANY sane and rational members in this movement, theit voices are being drowned out by the demogogues. I am asking for any rational pro-life person to take back their movement from the psychos who are responsible for so many acts of terrorism against clinics, against women and against doctors. This is NOT an insurmountable issue, but the pro-life side has GOT to understand that an ounce of prevention is worth the cure. Support access to family planning and adoptions by gay and lesbian people. Moreover, let's start having the adult discussion about sex and sexuality.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I really like what you wrote
Posted by: debpark
» Amen, Kym and Deb!
Posted by: dazzle59
» RE: I really like what you wrote
Posted by: theblackgeorgecarlin
» RE: I really like what you wrote
Posted by: theblackgeorgecarlin
» RE: Okay, here's a challenge for those against abortion
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Okay, here's a challenge for those against abortion
Posted by: Seranvali
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bearzerker on Jun 4, 2009 2:44 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
why do the federals pretend we're a free people and say they're protecting constitutional rights when they've been usurping all powers since 1968 under the guise of national security...
How bloated does the Federal bureaucracy need to get before we figure out the simple fact that they're only serving themselves?
Just follow the money... corporate money too and you'll see just how much has been lost in the past 50 years!
The Democrats won`t protect our values...
the lobby interests are to well funded to allow them any freedom of action.
The Republicans started this so they won't or can't either...
besides the fact that they were installed by their corporate crony friends.
The US is reaping what it sowed and the freedom meter cant fall any further!
Its funny that some rights can be devalued due to national security but anti-hate laws will never see the light of day because... what again?
land of the free indeed!
Long live the CORPORATE STATES OF AMERICA... not!
-- Mel Gibson in "The Patriot"
I would rather have 1 tyrant 3000 miles away then 3000 tyrants 1 mile away
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PROFPETE on Jun 4, 2009 5:16 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A murderer murders a mass-murderer. I see no reason either for tears or rejoicing. One man demented out of passion kills a man who murdered the unborn in the face of God for profit and or hatred, so who is the winners and losers?
Hitler loved abortion for those he hated and for that we branded him a demon. Americans have either forgotten or are ignorant of the abortion movement's slimy beginnings initiated by wealthy, Republicans and aimed with non-too subtle propaganda on why minorities should not grow future voters to unseat the Republicans because they feared the growth of minorities, Mexicans, Blacks and Italian Catholics.
I voted for Barack Obama because I believed he had the common sense not to support abortion or abortion counseling. As he said anyone with an “unwanted pregnancy” should pray and seek neutral help. You say nothing of the guilt and depression of mothers who have abortions, because you are ignorant of, or are ignoring the repercussions of murdering a living being.
Unsuccessful in those attempts to motivate Progressive Republican Politicians Like Teddy Roosevelt the "movement" decided to infiltrate the Democratic Party to undermine their target’s (minorities and their unborn) protection by Democratic Progressives. Alas, those careless low-lifers then entered the Democratic Party because their impiety, stupidity, bigotry, mean-spirited, Unenlightenment, and ignorance made them outcasts for righteous Progressives in the 19th and early 20th centuries.
The modern allowance of abortion the last 30+ years was/is based on a lie by Norma McCovney to a congressional committee (which I watched) about a rape which never occurred and to which she admitted recently as she converted to Catholicism. Me-FIRSTISM/selfishness has gripped the Worst Generation of Americans since the 1921 Tulsa OK Holocaust of Black people, those who favor the murder of the helpless unborn, immature human beings.
I am and have always been an FDR Progressive who fought, argued, and wrote for black and women's rights and who with my dad opened the doors for the first women construction workers in Illinois just as my granddad did for blacks. This is no women's issue it is a right to life issue, which I thought we'd won during WW II, but apparently, baby hatred in league with the Demons of real flesh and blood continues.
Your article is an example of Hate Group in action slandering the Culture of Life. How are you any different than Adolph Hitler who found abortion a perfect example of the “Final Solution?” Now for you the target is Christians replacing Jews. America is growing its own fascists. In that endeavor you are closer the to those responsible for the deaths of 5000 American troops and one million Iraqi’s and this depression and the bankruptcy of millions. The Bushite warmongers, who broke the Culture of Life, caused all of which.
The Culture of Life stands against Mass-murder, torture, preemptive war, capital punishment, casual cosmetic use of pesticides and herbicides which have been found in the fatty tissues of 96% of women with breast cancer and much more. You stand with the 19th Century Republicans who wanted to sterilize men and women or abort all children of minorities, all of those with IQ’s below 100. You, author is a hate monger and subject to the Patriot Act for Religious persecution and domestic terrorism for you is attempting to subject those who stand against Abortion to assassination. You are thus also a mass-murderer wanting to kill those who want to save the lives of the unborn. You would kill to promote more killing and justify the murders of the unborn. How sick is that?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» 'the unborn'
Posted by: mjglow
» RE: A murderer murders
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: A murderer murders a mass murderer...
Posted by: morticia
» RE: A murderer murders a mass murderer...
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: A murderer murders a mass murderer...
Posted by: Bibsisis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal on Jun 4, 2009 5:17 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When have you EVER heard of an atheist doing such evil in the name of atheism? It is ALWAYS a religious person.
It had been somewhat, (but not anymore) amazing to me that the "right to lifers" always like to kill…just on their terms…just like all religious organizations. Oh, they talk peace, love, etc. etc. but their actions speak even louder.
If abortion were outlawed, it would still occur, it is just that it would take place under unsafe conditions, by unskilled people. It would end two lives in many cases. But of course that does not make any sense to the self righteous, religious morons.
Examine the religious principles which have, in fact, prevailed in the world, and you will scarcely be persuaded that they are anything but sick men's dreams.
This once great country is in danger of being dominated by people ignorant enough to take a few ancient Babylonian legends as the canons of modern culture. Our scientific men are paying for their failure to speak out earlier. There is no use now talking evolution to these people. Their ears are stuffed with Genesis.
In all my lifetime of history reading I find not one instance where the Christian creed of itself prevented a cruelty or an atrocity, but I find innumerable instances where it provoked the vilest evils and the most fiendish cruelties.
The real reason for the persistence of the witchcraft idea was that Christian authorities couldn't let it die, without admitting that God's word was wrong, and God's servants had committed millions of legal murders and tortured millions of helpless people without cause.
No matter how much reasonable people, even here, might hammer away at their scientific and philosophical points, you are helpless and a laughing-stock if that were all you had.
It is religion that recruits their squadrons. Tens of millions of Americans, who neither know nor understand the actual arguments for - or even against - evolution, abortion, etc. march in the army of the night, their Babbles held high. And they are a strong and frightening force, impervious to, and immunized against, the feeble lance of mere reason.
The problem is that religion always gets a pass as the problem, because such evil is viewed as an anomaly. When is reality all religion, which is based on mythology and/or superstition is the root cause.
When religion dies, so will such evil perpetrated on Dr Tiller.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dudelette on Jun 4, 2009 10:10 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Kym525 on Jun 4, 2009 10:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I see a lot of high-faultin' rhetoric about Hitler, Mao, Saddam and mass murder, but nary a word of hope or understanding for the women they would criminalize should abortion be made illegal. Lots of sympathy for the unborn and their rights, but nothing about the children already born who are neglected, abused and even killed.
There are as many reasons women seek abortion as there are women. The word "choice" really doesn't begin to scratch the surface of what goes through the mind of a woman (and perhaps her family and her partner) who perhaps see no other way. A rape or incest victim is already traumatized by their experience. Compound that with an unwanted pregnancy and she suffers TWICE. Women who find out their child will be born without a heart or a brain, who would suffer should they live. Women who are in danger of losing their lives should they continue with a pregnancy. Poor women who cannot afford another child--and many pro-lifers decry welfare and other social services that aid the poor, calling it a "reward" for bad choices.
Contrary to what way too many pro-lifers believe, it is not selfishness on the part of women seeking abortion. It is not used as birth control as so many like to claim--because that's some pretty expensive birth control, considering that the procedures run from $500.00 and higher. Low-income women and working-class women, often lacking even basic health care, cannot afford it. And let's not even talk about access.
I extol all moderate and rational pro-life believers to make sure that every child, born and unborn, is wanted, loved and given the basic necessities in life so they can thrive. Let's give our children already here the knowledge about their sexuality--free from guilt, shame and fear--so that they can make responsible decisions regarding sex. Let's change a culture that on one hand demonizes sex and yet on the other commodifies it.
Pro-lifers: END YOUR HYPOCRISY NOW!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A not so outstanding lack of compassion
Posted by: lindalee
» RE: A not so outstanding lack of compassion
Posted by: mtnprivy
» RE: compassion
Posted by: WyrdSister
» More lack of compassion and understanding
Posted by: Kym525
» RE: A not so outstanding lack of compassion
Posted by: Seranvali
» Planned Parenthood provided all my birth control and . . .
Posted by: dudelette
» Isn't Planned Parenthood only for women?
Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: you are resorting to insults?
Posted by: WyrdSister
» Planned Parenthood NOT only for women
Posted by: crashgrab
» Me too!
Posted by: dazzle59
» RE: A not so outstanding lack of compassion
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: A not so outstanding lack of compassion
Posted by: Bibsisis
» Excellent post, Kym!
Posted by: dazzle59
» RE: A not so outstanding lack of compassion
Posted by: Little One
Comments are closed-
Posted by: roddma on Jun 6, 2009 11:55 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Who says a pro-life person did this?
Posted by: goatini
» RE: e:religion Sets The Stage, This is Sickening
Posted by: Seranvali
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JefFlyingV on Jun 7, 2009 2:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They are now God's messengers and doers. They don't believe in the constitution, but try to make use of the laws that can propel their agenda. Jim Jones, Ruby Ridge, Roeder, Rush Limbaugh, white supremists...etc, are all part of the hidden and ugly fabric of radical fundamentalism of Christianity. They may be marginalized, but they are a larger and more vocal group than we think.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: newsjunkie on Jun 7, 2009 12:12 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Consistent Life Statement of Purpose, via their website: "We are committed to the protection of life, which is threatened in today's world by war, abortion, poverty, racism, capital punishment and euthanasia. We believe that these issues are linked under a 'consistent ethic of life.' We challenge those working on all or some of these issues to maintain a cooperative spirit of peace, reconciliation, and respect in protecting the unprotected. We serve the anti-violence community by connecting issues, building bridges, and strengthening the case against each kind of socially-approved killing by consistently opposing them all."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Progressive Who Is Pro-life but Recognizes Abortion IS Still Legal
Posted by: morticia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mvendetto on Jun 7, 2009 2:43 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My daughter was born , what I later to find out was in her 2nd trimester ! She is a beautiful little girl , with thankfully no developmental issues. Make no mistake about it , if the mother's LIFE is in danger than an abortion at this stage should be the mothers option , but because someone is afraid to tell there parents , or it's inconvenient , or for any other lame reason to abort an otherwise viable , living baby is , sorry to tell truth , pathetic. The murder of this Dr.is also uncalled for. I don't know how this Dr. could live with himself , in what he did for a living. What ever happen to responcibility ? I'M SORRY , but abortion beyond six months should be illegal , accept if the mother's life is threatened , not incovienenced.
Mike Vendetto
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: mvendetto
Posted by: Seranvali
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Jun 8, 2009 10:54 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right wing terrorism is just nearly legal in the United States. When they finish with the abortion doctors which of us will they start on next. You don't actually think that they will stop do you.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Little One on Jun 11, 2009 6:18 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I pray for the Tiller family ;it is awful to lose a loved one through an act of violence and I also pray for Scott Roeder who sadly like Dr Tiller resorted to violence as a solution Abortion is never a solution for anyone It is always a death sentence for the baby and a life sentence for the poor mother A deliberate decision to abort goes totally against the natural instincts of a woman to nurture and protect and it is very damaging to the body heart and mind of any poor soul who endures such an experience.If we really care about women's health we can neither condone allow or encourage abortion.There are some things in life which are simply wrong Both slavery and abortion treat a human being as if it is a disposable asset. The child in the womb is not the property of the mother nor is it the property of the father It is a new citizen with rights that should be upheld and respected in Law. "
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Little One
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Little One
Posted by: Little One
» RE: Little One
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Little One
Posted by: Little One
» RE: Little One
Posted by: morticia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rakista on Jun 1, 2009 3:10 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look, you do yourselves no favour attempting to demonize and dehumanize all pro-lifers as some sort of bible-thumping, gun toting nutjobs as the social dynamic underlying the abortion debate is shifting to the younger generations who are moderately more pro-life than pro-choice.
If the progressive movement in the United States is to attract that newer generation there must be some acknowledgement that well over 30% of the people you stand with on issues of Gay Marriage, Torture, Death Penalty and Poverty are Pro-Life on abortion.
We are sick of your hateful stereotypes.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» as one of many true longtime progressives
Posted by: goatini
» RE: as one of many true longtime progressives
Posted by: pelican beak
» RE: as one of many true longtime progressives
Posted by: Xynyx
» RE: as one of many true longtime progressives
Posted by: Ian MacLeod
» RE: as one of many true longtime progressives
Posted by: Ian MacLeod
» Maybe the anti-choice crowd who are progressive in other ways should rename themselves
Posted by: smadaj
» RE: Maybe the anti-choice crowd who are progressive in other ways should rename themselves
Posted by: Xynyx
» I agree that stereotyping does no good, and I think ...
Posted by: harryf200
» Just admit it...
Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» RE: Just admit it... Okay yes - I admit to caring about the rights of the foetus.
Posted by: harryf200
» Thank you
Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» But the sterotyping comes from pro-lifers
Posted by: nate
» They aren't "pro-lifers"
Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» RE: They aren't "pro-lifers"
Posted by: BPomeroy
» "Nobody ever gets an abortion as a "life style choice." " Really? Just about every woman ...
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: "Nobody ever gets an abortion as a "life style choice." " Really? Just about every woman ...
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE:well, I think ... you're an 'Merkaan idiot
Posted by: DaBear
» But I don't think it can be justified as a lifestyle choice.
Posted by: zizizzi
» Silly zizizzi!
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: Silly ideas
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: Silly ideas
Posted by: PopRox80
» RE: Silly zizizzi!
Posted by: MelStL
» RE: Silly zizizzi!
Posted by: MelStL
» How would you protect the rights of a fetus?
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: I agree that stereotyping does no good, and I think ...
Posted by: rinthy
» RE: As one of many progressive pro-lifers
Posted by: maxfrisson
» Good point, maxfrisson ...
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: progressive pro-lifers= oxy-moron
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: progressive pro-lifers= oxy-moron
Posted by: crashgrab
» No, we rightfully demonize murderous prolifers, and those who inflame the passions of . . .
Posted by: Beck
» Oh, are you now?
Posted by: Ms. DuFontagne
» Thanks for the hateful stereotype
Posted by: sliver
» And we are sick of you
Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» RE: And we are sick of you
Posted by: Quannah
» Too much violence and hate coming from the pro-lifers
Posted by: nate
» More on hypocrisy
Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» RE: As one of many progressive pro-lifers
Posted by: crashgrab
» Hey, Rakista, I have but one question for you:
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Morticia, Rakista is not progressive
Posted by: Silverhawk
» RE: Morticia, Rakista is not progressive
Posted by: morticia
» RE: As one of many progressive pro-lifers
Posted by: buschthebearrefreshing
» YO! rakista! Special "candygram" for you (and vasumurti)!
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Rakista doesn't care if breathing women die. No sancity there
Posted by: Silverhawk
» RE: Correction: [Sanctity (of life)]
Posted by: Silverhawk
» RE: As one of many progressive pro-lifers
Posted by: DaBear
» RE: As one of many progressive pro-lifers
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: Truth - Fact = Two different things
Posted by: Silverhawk
» RE: Randall "Father" Terry - Wheel conspiracy assassin?
Posted by: Silverhawk
» RE: As one of many progressive pro-lifers
Posted by: Brb007
» RE: Right on Brb007 for US Babylon facts. 'Father' Terry's truth's are not facts
Posted by: Silverhawk
» RE: As one of many
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: As one of many progressive pro-lifers
Posted by: Bibsisis
» I am staunchly pro-choice but agree with rakista
Posted by: realmuzik
» RE: I am not impressed
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: I am staunchly pro-choice but agree with rakista
Posted by: pelican beak
» RE: I am staunchly pro-choice but agree with rakista
Posted by: Seranvali
» I AM ANGRY THAT PRO-CHOICE PROGRESSIVES ARE SO FULL OF HATE!
Posted by: realmuzik
» RE: I AM ANGRY THAT PRO-CHOICE PROGRESSIVES ARE SO FULL OF HATE!
Posted by: MelStL
» RE: I AM ANGRY THAT PRO-CHOICE PROGRESSIVES ARE SO FULL OF HATE!
Posted by: pelican beak
» RE: I AM ANGRY THAT PRO-CHOICE PROGRESSIVES ARE SO FULL OF HATE!
Posted by: MelStL
» RE: I AM ANGRY THAT PRO-CHOICE PROGRESSIVES ARE SO FULL OF HATE!
Posted by: pelican beak
» RE: I AM ANGRY THAT PRO-CHOICE PROGRESSIVES ARE SO FULL OF HATE!
Posted by: MelStL
» RE: I AM ANGRY THAT PRO-CHOICE PROGRESSIVES ARE SO FULL OF HATE!
Posted by: pelican beak
» RE: I AM ANGRY THAT PRO-CHOICE PROGRESSIVES ARE SO FULL OF HATE!
Posted by: MelStL
» No problem
Posted by: pelican beak
» I'm angry that you're angry, now stop being angry. What?
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: I am staunchly pro-choice but agree with rakista
Posted by: morticia
» RE: I am staunchly pro-choice but agree with rakista
Posted by: pelican beak
» RE: I am staunchly pro-choice but agree with rakista
Posted by: morticia
» RE: I am staunchly pro-choice but agree with rakista
Posted by: pelican beak
» RE: I am staunchly pro-woman and that's where my choice comes from
Posted by: hagwind
» RE: I am staunchly pro-woman and that's where my choice comes from
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: I am staunchly pro-woman and that's where my choice comes from
Posted by: MelStL
» RE: I am staunchly pro-woman and that's where my choice comes from
Posted by: hagwind
» RE: I am staunchly pro-woman and that's where my choice comes from
Posted by: MelStL
» Thank you, MelStL
Posted by: hagwind
» RE: As one of many progressive pro-lifers
Posted by: smackley
» Pro-choice = right to dither 6+months over ...?
Posted by: Ligeia
» RE: Pro-choice = right to dither 6+months over ...?
Posted by: morticia
» First, Do NO Harm ...
Posted by: Ligeia
» RE: First, Do NO Harm ...
Posted by: Aimleft
» RE: First, Do NO Harm ...
Posted by: lively56
» RE: First, Do NO Harm ...
Posted by: MelStL
» RE: no harm done ...
Posted by: WyrdSister
» So, Ligeia.....
Posted by: morticia
» RE: First, Do NO Harm ...
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: such venom
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: Pro-choice = right to dither 6+months over ...?
Posted by: Seranvali
» I am psychologically well
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: As one of many progressive pro-lifers
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: As one of many progressive pro-lifers
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: As one of many progressive pro-lifers
Posted by: clvngodess
» Here is what I don't see you people asking. If your going to advocate hate against a group.....
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MotherLodeBeth on Jun 1, 2009 3:20 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fact is, late term abortions like he did, are simply not something one needs unless the woman's life is actually at risk and then even most non religious owned hospitals would do those.
This isn't pre 1970's when even birth control was illegal for married couples. Now we have so many forms of reliable birth control that there should be so few abortions. But we live in a do my own thing society, or a society who wants someone else to help bail us out of messes we get into.
So sorry, while I am pro-choice in the very early weeks of an UNintended pregnancy I cannot support the majority of late term abortions. And I say this as someone who has a child born with medical issues. And a baby that was lost pre birth.
~Beth~
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» another fact free post from a forced birther
Posted by: goatini
» RE: another fact free post from a forced birther
Posted by: MotherLodeBeth
» RE: another fact free post from a forced birther
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: I'm sorry for your loss, but the abortions Tiller performed were for women at risk
Posted by: smadaj
» RE: Karma....
Posted by: dimityrose
» There is a reason that it is legal
Posted by: sliver
» Oh, my Gawd, a subservient to authoritarian edicts... how funny.
Posted by: Prophit
» Run for the hills, Prophit, the doctors are coming!
Posted by: sliver
» Have you even bothered to read up on Kansas late-term abortion laws?
Posted by: Defenestrator
» RE: Karma....you don't know what you are talking about
Posted by: free2disagree
» Free2disagree, thank you for a wonderful post.
Posted by: hagwind
» Excellent post! (no further comment)
Posted by: Xynyx
» RE: Karma....you don't know what you are talking about
Posted by: MelStL
» RE: Karma....you don't know what you are talking about
Posted by: Seranvali
» Late term abortions save women's lives
Posted by: nate
» RE: Karma....
Posted by: BPomeroy
» RE: Karma....
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: Karma....
Posted by: amalahyrdaya
» RE: Karma....
Posted by: Quannah
» Yes, kill all those who would vote for anyone but Obama... a true test of whether you should....
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Yes, kill all those who would vote for anyone but Obama... a true test of whether you should....
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: Karma...what do you know about Karma?
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: Karma...what do you know about Karma?
Posted by: Seranvali
» Luckily, it isn't your choice
Posted by: bbq
» RE: Thank you bbq - Your sentiments are mine. Nobody's biz
Posted by: Silverhawk
» RE: Karma....
Posted by: Pegaleg
» RE: Karma....
Posted by: clvngodess
» RE: Karma....
Posted by: Bibsisis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: goatini on Jun 1, 2009 3:26 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: already two posts with hate speech in response
Posted by: rakista
» my Constitutionally guaranteed autonomy over my body
Posted by: goatini
» RE: my Constitutionally guaranteed autonomy over my body
Posted by: rakista
» female autonomy cannot wait
Posted by: goatini
» RE: female autonomy cannot wait
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: my Constitutionally guaranteed autonomy over my body
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: my Constitutionally guaranteed autonomy over my body
Posted by: Seranvali
» And how many of these babies do you plan to raise?
Posted by: bbq
» I think you take this too far ... and i am not a rabid pro lifers!
Posted by: harryf200
» rabid pro lifers!
Posted by: WyrdSister
» Sorry, but that is just b..... ks (pun intended) I'm not suggesting guys get off Scott Free.
Posted by: harryf200
» Pregnancy is not a "fault"
Posted by: nate
» You're kidding me - right?
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: Sorry, but that is just b..... ks (pun intended) I'm not suggesting guys get off Scott Free.
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: Sorry, but that is just b..... ks (pun intended) I'm not suggesting guys get off Scott Free.
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: Sorry, but that is just b..... ks (pun intended) I'm not suggesting guys get off Scott Free.
Posted by: left_witch
» RE: Sorry, but that is just b..... ks (pun intended) I'm not suggesting guys get off Scott Free.
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: Sorry, but that is just b..... ks (pun intended) I'm not suggesting guys get off Scott Free.
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: Sorry, but that is just b..... ks (pun intended) I'm not suggesting guys get off Scott Free.
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: Sorry, but that is just b..... ks (pun intended) I'm not suggesting guys get off Scott Free.
Posted by: Quannah
» What kind of idiot are you who would ....
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: What kind of idiot are you who would ....
Posted by: Quannah
» "Go fuck yourself" Well, rather with me than with you ...
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: What kind of idiot are you who would ....
Posted by: Brb007
» RE: What kind of idiot are you who would ....
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: What kind of idiot are you who would ....
Posted by: lively56
» RE: What kind of idiot are you who would ....
Posted by: MelStL
» RE: Sorry, but that is just b..... ks (pun intended) I'm not suggesting guys get off Scott Free.
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: I think you take this too far ... and i am not a rabid pro lifers!
Posted by: harryf200
» Thanks for the response
Posted by: Curio
» RE: Thanks for the response
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: Thanks for the response
Posted by: Curio
» RE: Thanks for the response
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: Thanks for the response
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: Thanks for the response
Posted by: Curio
» i am not a rabid pro lifers...no, your just arrogant
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: i am not a rabid pro lifers...no, your just arrogant
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: I think you take this too far ... and i am not a rabid pro lifers!
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: I think you take this too far ... and i am not a rabid pro lifers!
Posted by: Bibsisis
» Read Mandatory Motherhood by Garrett Hardin
Posted by: smadaj
» See, here's the problem, rakista:
Posted by: morticia
» RE: He Man Woman Hater Club member Grunts Again
Posted by: Purple Girl
» oh Purple Girl
Posted by: goatini
» It would seem that "ladies" is a term YOU value.
Posted by: Beck
» please see my response to Purple Girl
Posted by: goatini
» Gee, where's vasumurti?
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Gee, where's vasumurti?
Posted by: Xynyx
» goatini's a gal, and a good one!
Posted by: morticia
» RE: goatini's a gal, and a good one!
Posted by: goatini
» RE: already two posts with hate speech in response
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: already two posts with hate speech in response
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: already two posts with hate speech in response
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: already two posts with hate speech in response
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» I see way more than two posts with hate speech and its on both sides...
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: hate speech
Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: already two posts with hate speech in response
Posted by: Bibsisis
» you misread my post
Posted by: goatini
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tony D on Jun 1, 2009 4:17 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The lesson here is that Christians are not ever supposed to kill because someone has a different opinion then they do.
They should arrest all the anti-abortion people who parade in front of the clinic and send them away to an insane asylum until they are cured. While they are at it they may as well send Bill O'Reiley with them.
Proof of the adage that: "their are good people and evil people in the world but to make a good person evil it takes religion."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Pro-life isn't just an issue for people whop are religious ...
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: Pro-life isn't just an issue for people whop are religious ...
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: Pro-life isn't just an issue for people whop are religious ...
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: Pro-life isn't just an issue for people whop are religious ...
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: Pro-life isn't just an issue for people whop are religious ...
Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: Anthony D'Auria
Posted by: Bibsisis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cherylsass123 on Jun 1, 2009 5:06 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You are right that more birth control would reduce abortion, but no BC is 100% effective
Posted by: smadaj
» If you don't want the responsibility of bringing up a child, and ....
Posted by: harryf200
» Use condoms!
Posted by: nate
» Poor bloody excuse!
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: If you don't want the responsibility of bringing up a child, and ....
Posted by: crashgrab
» If you don't have the resources to bring up a baby, then ...
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: If you don't have the resources to bring up a baby, then ...
Posted by: Quannah
» Men don't need a dildo, silly.
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: Men don't need a dildo, silly.
Posted by: crashgrab
» Do you choose not to drive a car because you might injure or kill someone?
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: If you don't want the responsibility of bringing up a child, and ....
Posted by: crashgrab
» Really? Then be healthy with sex by masturbating. That's natural, too.
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: eally? Then be healthy with sex by masturbating. That's natural, too.
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: If you don't want the responsibility of being a progressive, don't claim to be one
Posted by: DaBear
» Actually, dude, I'm an athiest...
Posted by: harryf200
» If you're an atheist then you should learn how to spell it.
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: If you don't want the responsibility of bringing up a child, and ....
Posted by: Quannah
» Actually, I'd rather you didn't fuck me, Quannah - I'm sure you're not my type....
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: Actually, I'd rather you didn't fuck me, Quannah - I'm sure you're not my type....
Posted by: Quannah
» LOL!!! Thanks for the laugh, Quannah!!!
Posted by: harryf200
» Child-bearing isn't worthless
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: Child-bearing isn't worthless
Posted by: Seranvali
» RE: Actually, I'd rather you didn't fuck me, Quannah - I'm sure you're not my type....
Posted by: Bibsisis
» Be lesbian or gay!
Posted by: hagwind
» RE: Be lesbian or gay!
Posted by: crashgrab
» Two Birth Control babies out of five children
Posted by: PrinceRobert
» RE: Two Birth Control babies out of five children
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: this is sickening
Posted by: crashgrab
» Most of the women who have late-term abortion...
Posted by: bbq
» RE: Most of the women who have late-term abortion...
Posted by: Seranvali
» Netherlands has huge Islamic population ...
Posted by: Ligeia
» RE: Netherlands has huge Islamic population ...
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Netherlands has huge Islamic population ...
Posted by: MelStL
» RE: Netherlands has huge Islamic population ...
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Netherlands has huge Islamic population ...
Posted by: crashgrab
» Women don't die in childbearth anymore?
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: Women don't die in childbearth anymore?
Posted by: morticia
» RE: this is sickening
Posted by: Seranvali
Comments are closed-
» RE: You get what you give
Posted by: kimpohl
» RE: You get what you give
Posted by: crashgrab
» RE: You get what you give
Posted by: gilliani
» RE: You get what you give
Posted by: lyta
» I hope they are unbowed by the terrorists because ...
Posted by: harryf200
» RE: You get what you give-right back atcha
Posted by: WyrdSister
» "hate begets hate" Well, that's something we agree on, altho' ...
Posted by: harryf200
» They aren't "children"
Posted by: nate
» RE: You get what you give
Posted by: crashgrab
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bearzerker on Jun 1, 2009 8:25 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
or how many countries will need to be invaded to soothe the frantic news propagandists spewing hatred in the name of free speech!
religion is freaky in the US, but all i can say is that most peoples vision of heaven, is my vision of hell!
and people wonder why we loose faith...
in religion, politics, relationships etc
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DrBrian on Jun 2, 2009 12:25 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We must make a distinction between clear advocacy of criminal behavior and expression of opinions that might contribute to an unhinged person's taking it upon him- or herself to avenge perceived wrongdoing.
The First Amendment is essential to democracy and should allow for unhindered expression of opinions, even overheated or offensive ones, as long as they stop short of advocating crimes.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Whose Ox is Being Gored, and Does It Matter?
Posted by: lyta
» RE: Whose Ox is Being Gored, and Does It Matter?
Posted by: Amolibri
» RE: Whose Ox is Being Gored, and Does It Matter?
Posted by: DrBrian
» There is no DEMOCRACY here
Posted by: dimityrose
» Agree
Posted by: EncinoM
» The difference is: a man has been murdered
Posted by: nate
» Again you are giving away the 1st Amendment
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Again you are giving away the 1st Amendment
Posted by: DaBear
» RE: Again you are giving away the 1st Amendment
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Again you are giving away the 1st Amendment
Posted by: prorock
» Special Pleading, or Should We Just Abolish Free Speech for All?
Posted by: DrBrian
» RE: Agree
Posted by: Seranvali
Comments are closed-
Posted by: atheistcable on Jun 2, 2009 2:41 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When we register for classes, there is a blank on their form asking what our religion is or, as in my case, no religion. Members of Minnesota Atheists are heavily involved.
There are two leaders: Dr. Grant Steves, an atheist, who has a doctorate in theology, and the other leader is Chester Barber, a Christian who is also working on his doctorate in theology.
As people are coming into the room, the two leaders start assembling us in groups of 6 or 8. You will see both atheists and theists with bibles in their hands. The leaders make sure that we're as evenly divided as possible, theists and atheists. They hand us introductory literature and questionnaires we're to fill out so that we can give a verbal report at the end. We have scholars who come to our class and give a 30-minute presentation.
We talk about what a god is and compare that to gods of other cultures. We discuss belief, sins, morals, how and if the stories in the OT/NT are relevant to our lives (most are not), and where atheists and theists get their morals from.
I don't follow the rules exactly. Occasionally, I bring up topics such as abortion and gay marriage which, especially the abortion issue, engages the group.
All of us have fun. We never come close to having heated arguments. We define our words, we look to evidence, and if there is no evidence for a particular claim, we simply drop the issue. Sometimes people exchange email addresses and continue the discussion on their own time.
Here in the Twin Cities, there is no organized group where the public can gather, to talk about abortion--or the drug war. Many women who are members of Minnesota Atheists are interested in discussing abortion and I am working presently to organize a discussion group based on the SBS format. I wanted to do this some time ago, but the assassination of Dr. Tiller has given this project a boost.
Not all atheists are pro-Choice. I've met a few men who are disturbingly anti-Choice. My explanation is that individuals can rise above the god concept, but they bring with them many ghosts from their former religious life. A few heterosexual males are also uncomfortable around the few gays that are active in our organization. (Women always seem to be more emotionally well-adjusted than men.)
