COMMENTS: 147
Why Susan Boyle Has Captured Hearts Around the World
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Reproductive Justice headlines via email.
Will Susan Boyle's epic moment last week on Britain's Got Talent (not a BBC show) turn out to be a choreographed piece of TV manipulation? Probably. But that'll just mean that something false gave rise to something true.
Captain Richard Phillips of the good ship Maersk Alabama—and Sully Sullenberger splashing down his crippled airliner in the Hudson River—broke through the poisonous smog of economic depression and Wall Street skullduggery with a reminder that pure individual heroism is a daily occurrence if we know where to look for it. Susan Boyle is another avatar of global yearning.
The YouTube clip of Susan's angel voice soaring from the unkissed mouth of that scrunchy-faced, eyebrow-enforested, unprepossessingly dumpy representative of anonymous humanity was the third irresistible message to us all to get over ourselves. Until things get better, we will all go on being unusually receptive to such epiphanies from the news. They remind us what uncomplicated strength of character looks like.
The surge for Boyle reinforces the point again: We're all getting sick of being bullied by bad values. Sick of disappearing everyone who's plain or strange or not one of the cool crowd. This hero was no Captain Courageous. She just had to fight against being plain and a bit odd from mild early brain damage.
There is a passionate desire from Ms. Boyle's new fans all over the blogosphere not to see her subjected to the seemingly inevitable show business makeover. Keep that frumpy little dress! Don't let some mincing beautician-to-the-stars rip out those exploding eyebrows!
Among the many underdog groups Boyle scored with was that universally dismissed demographic—Invisible Women: the unbeautiful 47 year-olds who don't rate a second look and never get a chance to make their point in the meeting. There are so many aging women who feel dissed by popular culture and employers alike. Much of Hillary Clinton's strength in the 2008 campaign was built on this overlooked demographic. Unwanted by TV shows, advertisers, movies, and corporate recruiters, Invisible Women feel that their experience—often holding families together while doing the work that puts bigger egos in the corner office—goes not just unrewarded but unrecognized. Can't they at least see me? goes the voice in their heads. Especially after all those wasted hours trying to look younger, slimmer, and better dressed just to get their rightful desserts.
That's why it brought tears to our eyes when Susan Boyle presented herself to the Roman mob and proved that its low expectations of her were unfounded. That little jig she did at the end of her appearance was a victory dance. It reminded me of a very different moment, a political one: the feeling in the room when Hillary won her victory in the Ohio primary. The auditorium that night was crammed with jubilant middle-aged women pumping their fists to the raucous sound of Aretha Franklin belting out RESPECT. How Hillary—with her elite education, stellar career, and eight years in the White House—could come to represent the Forgotten Women is an index of how hungrily they sought one.
It will of course be only a matter of months before Susan Boyle's eyebrows get a pluck job—and a new wave of reality television co-opts "authenticity" as the fake new thing. Yesterday's New York Times told how last fall MTV convened an urgent executive meeting to discuss how to scare up some positive social messaging from their glitz-peddling reality shows.
What a drag. We wanted to keep the Susan Boyle moment for ourselves. If it was an illusion, at least it was our illusion. It made us feel so much better than theirs will.
Stay up to date with the latest Reproductive Justice headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: FLYING DOOFUS on Apr 21, 2009 12:09 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Women only
Posted by: kepstein7777
» RE: Women only
Posted by: Dr. P. Mooney
» RE: It's her glorious voice. And you are
Posted by: Fempatriot
» Susan's discovery is a formula. Ever seen Mr. Humble, Paul Potts?
Posted by: Centavo
» RE: Susan's discovery is a formula. Ever seen Mr. Humble, Paul Potts?
Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Formula? Maybe yes, maybe no...
Posted by: nha16
» RE: Formula? Maybe yes, maybe no...
Posted by: Longdream
» Couldn't agree with you more nha16.
Posted by: Centavo
» RE: YAWN ! It's all about women only. Well, time for me to slobber another philly cheese steak !
Posted by: sirios
» RE: YAWN ! It's all about women only. Well, time for me to slobber another philly cheese steak !
Posted by: ookah
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Honky The Antichrist on Apr 21, 2009 12:52 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since women are the majority, they have the ability to put however they want in the White House. Women, like everyone else, realize that Hilary is nothing more than a snake in the grass. If she had any value, she would have divorced her husband after he humiliated her in front of everyone on the planet. Instead, she tried to ride his coattail and name to the White House.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» OH, you're an idiot, I get it
Posted by: SalB
» RE: Hilary would be president if women wanted Hilary to be president.
Posted by: ms_happy
» ??????
Posted by: Beck
» "For better or worse" actually means something to God
Posted by: eeezzz
Comments are closed-
Posted by: countingdaisies on Apr 21, 2009 1:17 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: When is that makeover taking place?
Posted by: Kate_24
» Because that is objectifying her
Posted by: suprmark
» RE:
Posted by: nha16
» RE: Because that is objectifying her
Posted by: Kate_24
» RE: When is that makeover taking place?
Posted by: Vik
» RE: When is that makeover taking place?
Posted by: kabac
» RE: When is that makeover taking place?
Posted by: babs
» RE: When is that makeover taking place?
Posted by: Vik
» RE: When is that makeover taking place?
Posted by: hagwind
» RE: When is that makeover taking place?
Posted by: babs
» RE: When is that makeover taking place?
Posted by: AMerrickanGirl
» RE: When is that makeover taking place?
Posted by: Vik
» RE: When is that makeover taking place?
Posted by: sirios
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mandiwrite on Apr 21, 2009 2:13 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Don't go changin'...
Posted by: mercianomad
» RE: Sounds like you been duped...
Posted by: jimidee
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HoboHomo on Apr 21, 2009 2:19 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Of course it doesn't occur to all you dufus heteros...
Posted by: cordas
» RE: Of course it doesn't occur to all you dufus heteros...
Posted by: HoboHomo
» I don't get that at all...
Posted by: nha16
» RE: I don't get that at all...
Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: Of course it doesn't occur to all you dufus heteros...
Posted by: Vik
» RE: Of course it doesn't occur to all you dufus heteros...
Posted by: HoboHomo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cordas on Apr 21, 2009 2:49 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author of this article is even worse than the PR people she lambastes for maybe wanting to pluck, style and mold Ms Boyle. That and the idiot above who is making spurious claims about her sexuality.
Ms Boyle isn't the poster girl for forgotten women, she isn't the hidden lesbian gem, she doesn't need to be polished.
I know this might sound patronising but she should be given the space and support to be who she wants to be. If she wants a make over, to go back to her cottage and cats, run for 1st world leader, whatever it should be left up to her, not some bunch of self justifying idiots looking to push their desires onto her... unless of course thats what she wants but some how I doubt it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: STOP PROJECTING!
Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: STOP PROJECTING!
Posted by: special_k
» RE: STOP PROJECTING!
Posted by: HoboHomo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Prairie Waif on Apr 21, 2009 2:50 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the writer had listened to the entire clip, Simon gives her his comment about being a "little tiger," to which a voice that sounds like a girl making a playground retort to a boy who's just told the "plain Jane" she is beautiful; Susan Boyle can be heard saying, "Oh Simon!" in a very true sounding reply.
And if you have seen any of the interviews, since her "rise to fame," you can see she is the genuine article, not some fantasy of gimmicky marketers, as was the case with Milli Vanilli who couldn't "sing" without a microphone, let alone sing on demand, without music.
As for making over her eyebrows?
If, as would most likely be a very good place for her talents, she ends up in musical theater, then she will be required to do, as all actors do, and adjust to the role they are playing.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: "It a set-up! Probably."
Posted by: Ruby
» RE: "It a set-up! Probably."
Posted by: HoboHomo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: colinsyme on Apr 21, 2009 3:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She is a small town girl with learning difficulties, not very goodlooking and who most likely had no social life.
She entered, six years in a row in the "Fauldhouse miners welfare club talent contest" and never won that contest. The miners welfare club being a typical small town working class club.
She submitted several demo discs to record companies and was rejected each time.
She entered, the talent show "my kind of people" in the late 90s and never got onto the short list.
She was going give up singing but was persuaded to have "one last shot" at BGT by her singing coach.
She attends church regularly and well loved by her local Catholic community.
Local folk who know her have told of the way she has been bullied all her life.
Why is she a success only now? well possibly we all feel guilty of how shallow and superficial the world has become, that a atractive person not that talented, will allways have an edge over an ugly person who has great talent.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: sock on the jaw for the shallow
Posted by: hagwind
» The lovely Rachel
Posted by: zipper696
» RE: The lovely Rachel
Posted by: hagwind
» RE: The lovely Rachel
Posted by: ADCS
» She is not ugly.
Posted by: ulla
» RE: She is not ugly...she's butt ugli!
Posted by: jimidee
» RE: She is not ugly...she's butt ugli!
Posted by: babs
» RE: She is not ugly.
Posted by: colinsyme
» RE: Britney?
Posted by: Longdream
» RE: She is not ugly.
Posted by: babs
» Music Is For the Ears, Not the Eyes
Posted by: Libertine
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CHD on Apr 21, 2009 5:51 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If she had been introduced as good amateur singer with years of church and choir experience and a previous released recording would your reaction be different?
As always with these shows (especially the ITV/Simon Cowell ones) the focus soon turns from the 'talent' of an individual to an exploitative expedition through their past to recount their bullying/abuse/death/abandonment sob stories in front of the camera to make them, ITV, and Mr. Cowell a bit more money. Wouldn't be surprised to see it happen in this case too.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: And you're a cynic.
Posted by: Fempatriot
» RE: And you're a cynic.
Posted by: cordas
» RE: And you're a cynic.
Posted by: CHD
» RE: It's a tv talent show. Nothing more.
Posted by: nha16
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wellaware lec on Apr 21, 2009 7:17 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Apr 21, 2009 7:22 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: SO MANY GREEN EYED MONSTERS
Posted by: athurlow
» RE: SO MANY GREEN EYED MONSTERS
Posted by: bizeeb
» RE: SO MANY GREEN EYED MONSTERS
Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: SO MANY GREEN EYED MONSTERS
Posted by: sirios
Comments are closed-
Posted by: xpress411 on Apr 21, 2009 7:42 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» No, you must form your own movement. SB WAS a victory for women, and humanity, but. . .
Posted by: Beck
» RE: No, you must form your own movement. SB WAS a victory for women, and humanity, but. . .
Posted by: bizeeb
» RE: No, you must form your own movement. SB WAS a victory for women, and humanity, but. . .
Posted by: CarlaWaters
» Oh, wow, I've gone back in time . . .
Posted by: hagwind
» You got it all wrong. I didn't say that women must submit to men.
Posted by: CarlaWaters
» RE: If you want to fight for equal rights of men and women, I'm with you.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» RE: No, you must form your own movement. SB WAS a victory for women, and humanity, but. . .
Posted by: babs
» RE: No, you must form your own movement. SB WAS a victory for women, and humanity, but. . .
Posted by: CarlaWaters
» RE: No, you must form your own movement. SB WAS a victory for women, and humanity, but. . .
Posted by: Longdream
» RE: No, you must form your own movement. SB WAS a victory for women, and humanity, but. . .
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» I haven't read her posts?
Posted by: Longdream
» A YOYO Dubya and a man-hater in one ! Get a life !
Posted by: CarlaWaters
» RE: A YOYO Dubya and a man-hater in one ! Get a life !
Posted by: babs
» RE: A YOYO Dubya and a man-hater in one ! Get a life !
Posted by: CarlaWaters
» So Beck, babs "rocks" for being negative like you? I should have known.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» RE: No, you must form your own movement. SB WAS a victory for women, and humanity, but. . .
Posted by: xpress411
» RE: No, you must form your own movement. SB WAS a victory for women, and humanity, but. . .
Posted by: CarlaWaters
» you know, I remember a number of plump and/or odd, dweeby men on these shows, yet. ..
Posted by: Beck
» More sexist talk. How about that?
Posted by: CarlaWaters
» Start sticking up for the overweight, etc., xpress. Don't expect women to do what you apparently.
Posted by: Beck
» If women of the yester years were like Beck and babs, women's rights would have never existed.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» RE: If women of the yester years were like Beck and babs, women's rights would have never existed.
Posted by: Longdream
» RE: If women of the yester years were like Beck and babs, women's rights would have never existed.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» RE: If women of the yester years were like Beck and babs, women's rights would have never existed.
Posted by: Longdream
» Exactly ! This site has a serious weakness of being too female-only biased.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» RE: Men ALSO feel unappreciated, ignored, and ridiculed by modern society!!!!!!
Posted by: HoboHomo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Apr 21, 2009 7:47 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That said, it's just another television program, folks. Reality tee vee, at that, in which the creativity and art are largely limited to the insults and praise by three mafRIAA tycoons.
Oh well. American Idol(atry) marches onward. At least we aren't lopping the heads off journalists and stoning abuse victims as a rule.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: QQOblivion on Apr 21, 2009 7:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A Man Speaks
Posted by: HoboHomo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Fempatriot on Apr 21, 2009 8:03 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Shut Up
Posted by: nen
» RE: Shut Up
Posted by: babs
» No, this is an article about a group of American women
Posted by: suprmark
» RE: As a fellow penis-owner...
Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Tina Brown and her left-handed compliments
Posted by: phatkhat
» RE: Tina Brown and her left-handed compliments
Posted by: Fempatriot
» RE: Tina Brown and her left-handed compliments
Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: Tina Brown and her left-handed compliments
Posted by: sirios
Comments are closed-
Posted by: waterflaws on Apr 21, 2009 8:09 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NamVeT on Apr 21, 2009 8:40 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This ordinary
Posted by: DaBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: donnambirdlady on Apr 21, 2009 8:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is hard on celebrities of beauty but ordinary talent like Brittany Spears who are pushed and marketed to death and makes fame nearly impossible for those with talent but looks that are less than stunning.
I recall a few years ago a very talented friend of mine, Ginny Mitchell produced a beautiful CD. Great songs, wonderfully performed with some fairly famous friends of hers in the backup band. The CD won a music award in Canada but only got play on one local radio station in the US. Her CD was not a big seller, even in her hometown but it is one of my all time favorites. I have often thought that the only reason it was not a huge success is that she is attractive, but in a very ordinary way. Average looks, I guess don't sell with the big record companies. Too bad, she is a gem of a person with great talent. The last I heard she was performing for the elderly in nursing homes.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ceti on Apr 21, 2009 9:15 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ms_happy on Apr 21, 2009 9:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: She had the makeover before the show...
Posted by: jimidee
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Libertine on Apr 21, 2009 10:09 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With a talent like Boyle's, it doesn't (or shouldn't) matter what she looks like. She's the real deal. The entertainment world is chock full of vacuous pretty girls with only the barest modicum of singing talent, but a talent like Boyle's is a rarity and should be valued for the treasure it is.
Indeed, the outer packaging is of supreme importance for the dime-a-dozen bimbo singers, precisely because their talent is mediocre at best, and the flashy appearance is to make audiences forget their less than stellar vocal skills.
As far as I'm concerned, the singing world needs more Susan Boyles and fewer Ashlee Simpsons.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Hecate_magika on Apr 21, 2009 11:43 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BlueTigress on Apr 21, 2009 11:55 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A lot of bands from the '70s were not formed by good-looking people. You couldn't tell by listening to the records.
Then MTV came along and the emphasis went to the visuals.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: MTV messaging
Posted by: morticia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hilaryuk on Apr 21, 2009 12:51 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MJ Fields on Apr 21, 2009 1:00 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Nice diversion, AlterNet
Posted by: babs
» RE: Nice diversion, AlterNet
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» I agree!
Posted by: waterflaws
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gravitas on Apr 21, 2009 2:38 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Leave it to the mainstream media (MSM) to take the poignancy out of the moment. We love her, we watch her over and over, we are reduced to tears. But some media cynics just don’t get it. Kind of like how the pre Christmas Eve Scrooge was unable to see what most dogs and kids knew all along. They tell us that we are overreacting, and tritely dismiss her popularity as coming from the disparity between how she looks and how she sounds.
I say NOT SO FAST! I think this is more than just a morality lite sound bite, “can’t judge a book by its cover;” we should have known that what was in the package with the plain wrapping was better than what was in the one with the fancy ribbons. We are humbled at her magical Seraphine like voice because we are reacting to the power of our own experience. Yes, we are taught to obsess on all the wrong things: looks, fame, fortune, power and a whole list of other externals. But we don’t just judge others on those things, we judge ourselves as well. How many of us have shackled our dreams because we don’t feel adequate enough? (Insert pretty, thin, young etc here!) Everyone knows if you don’t have the right props you won’t succeed. Be a good little person and bow out until someone finds the right product you can buy to fix yourself. When someone just like us dares; well, how dare they? We cringe with resentment; deep down, we would never have the nerve. And yet, when she opened her mouth to sing (or let the angels sing through her), all that melted away. She dashed all our defenses, pierced a million pretenses. Dysfunctional cultural delusions crumbled faster than credit default swaps because they couldn’t hold up to the moment of truth. Real greatness comes only from the heart and the soul. And when one has this, all else is eclipsed.
The lesson of Susan could never be more salient than at this very moment. Our society is falling under the weight of its own lies. Corruption, cheating, dishonesty everywhere we look. What isn’t a lie anymore? From the products we buy to the politicians who are bought off, nothing is as it seems. As we walk through the fog of fraud, we stumble upon authenticity and are stunned by it. We weep because we are still able to recognize it. This isn’t like how our taste buds have been so deadened by processed food the natural doesn’t taste right to us anymore. We still respond to real beauty! We are not soul dead yet. Maybe we will be o.k. We just need to stop listening to those leading us down false paths for their own agendas and listen to our own inner wisdom. I think Susan really is an angel in disguise letting us know the only thing we can trust is the sincerity deep within ourselves. If we follow that, it is not too late to find our way home.
Susan’s performance is a modern day archetypical moment. But I hope we are careful in choosing the right fairy tale. MSM is only too happy to use the rags to riches cliché of Cinderella. But this goes way beyond Cinderella. This is the Buddha as beggar, the goddess as goat herder. This lesson is a reminder of the inextricable link between greatness, humility and simplicity. Leave the Cinderellas to the commercial sponsors. Although Sleeping Beauty may not too far off, because Susan’s true greatness can only be appreciated by the pure of heart.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Apr 21, 2009 2:48 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Apr 21, 2009 2:53 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Too True
Posted by: Gravitas
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Blondinista on Apr 21, 2009 3:30 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In fact, hers was a sweet victory for anyone, regardless of gender, who was ever laughed at, bullied, ridiculed, or disparaged for being not pretty enough or thin enough, or rich enough, or stylish enough... etc...
From all of us underdogs -- Susan, you rock!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: navy-vet on Apr 21, 2009 3:47 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Then there's English opera star Jane Eaglen. In a day when opera stars are expected to be slinky slim, beautiful, and also vocally powerful (not easy when you're skinny), we still have wonderful Jane. Yep, overweight, plain, dumpy, maybe not too convincing as consumptive Mimi, but what a voice!!
Now we have Susan, whose vocal power resembles Kate's and Jane's. And she sings for the world. God bless Susan Boyle.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Look at Maria Callas, another opera singer
Posted by: rclord
» RE: Poor Maria Callas
Posted by: navy-vet
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Benn_Miller on Apr 21, 2009 4:31 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: outlook on Apr 21, 2009 4:31 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: irenicus on Apr 21, 2009 5:04 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Longdream on Apr 21, 2009 5:08 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I though Susan was cute, and funny, and very charming the way she said, Simon!, and You, too, Amanda?! and stood up for herself.
My wish for her is that she gets to do what she wants. If she wants to pluck and get new hair, fine. If not, fine. Just like with a wonderful, haunting mezzo soprano or a brilliant tenor, the outer trappings won't get in the way of the outpouring of love for what Susan can do, and I think her appearance, whatever you make of it, is only a small part of what draws people to her.
Susan, long may you run!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TheLimit on Apr 21, 2009 6:35 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's different here? Is the perception that putting her eyebrows straight is going to improve the voice? Or are we just so totally obsessed that we can't get past our eyes to feast our ears?
The woman has an altogether lovely voice, and some vocal skills to go with it.
Eat your heart out Paul Potts.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: J- on Apr 21, 2009 7:21 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Record labels under the guidance of the WWII generation didn't have these debates or discussions. That generation gave us labels that allowed the Miles Davis, Led Zepplin, Rolling Stones, Janis Joplin's and Iggy Pop's of the world to make music, rather than be an image.
If you want to place blame on why talent like Susan Boyle is so oft ignored for the size-zero-computer-enhanced "singer", you only have to look towards the Baby Boomer executives and their lust for the short term gain. Their desire to fore-go artist developement to increase quarter over quarter profits.
I know, I've been there. I've seen it first hand.
You can go ahead and try and fill in whatever cause you want, but at the end of the day, it will always relate back to Boomer greed at the expense of artistry.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gypsyfred on Apr 22, 2009 12:35 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Do You Know Anything About Women?
Posted by: Gravitas
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sharmuse on Apr 22, 2009 7:13 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: adonisna on Apr 23, 2009 1:19 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mikeblack on Apr 23, 2009 12:16 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The captured captain being saved and pilot able to stop a crash were great and all. But when the media chooses to put those stories on loop in between entertainment news, murdered child news and missing hottie of the month news. Then it's no longer news. It's infotainment that has been a plague since the early 90s days of The Menedez Brothers, Amy Fisher, Jon Benet Ramsey and OJ Simpson. Including stuff like that is fine, as long as you don't make it the total focus of current events. But that's all you get for the majority of your news programming on mainstream media.
But this Susan Boyle crap.....there is absolutely zero reason why this needs to be focused on. It's an entertainment story so regulate it to Entertainment Tonight and Access Hollywood. What exactly is news worthy about this? That men are shallow and find her ugly or that people think middle aged virgins are humorous? No, really?!
Now this dumb crap has invaded Alternet. Keep infotainment away from here, please. The Octo-Mom had more relevance to society than some amateur singer with *GASP!* bushy eyebrows.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: FLYING DOOFUS on Apr 21, 2009 12:09 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Women only
Posted by: kepstein7777
» RE: Women only
Posted by: Dr. P. Mooney
» RE: It's her glorious voice. And you are
Posted by: Fempatriot
» Susan's discovery is a formula. Ever seen Mr. Humble, Paul Potts?
Posted by: Centavo
» RE: Susan's discovery is a formula. Ever seen Mr. Humble, Paul Potts?
Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Formula? Maybe yes, maybe no...
Posted by: nha16
» RE: Formula? Maybe yes, maybe no...
Posted by: Longdream
» Couldn't agree with you more nha16.
Posted by: Centavo
» RE: YAWN ! It's all about women only. Well, time for me to slobber another philly cheese steak !
Posted by: sirios
» RE: YAWN ! It's all about women only. Well, time for me to slobber another philly cheese steak !
Posted by: ookah
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Honky The Antichrist on Apr 21, 2009 12:52 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since women are the majority, they have the ability to put however they want in the White House. Women, like everyone else, realize that Hilary is nothing more than a snake in the grass. If she had any value, she would have divorced her husband after he humiliated her in front of everyone on the planet. Instead, she tried to ride his coattail and name to the White House.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» OH, you're an idiot, I get it
Posted by: SalB
» RE: Hilary would be president if women wanted Hilary to be president.
Posted by: ms_happy
» ??????
Posted by: Beck
» "For better or worse" actually means something to God
Posted by: eeezzz
Comments are closed-
Posted by: countingdaisies on Apr 21, 2009 1:17 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: When is that makeover taking place?
Posted by: Kate_24
» Because that is objectifying her
Posted by: suprmark
» RE:
Posted by: nha16
» RE: Because that is objectifying her
Posted by: Kate_24
» RE: When is that makeover taking place?
Posted by: Vik
» RE: When is that makeover taking place?
Posted by: kabac
» RE: When is that makeover taking place?
Posted by: babs
» RE: When is that makeover taking place?
Posted by: Vik
» RE: When is that makeover taking place?
Posted by: hagwind
» RE: When is that makeover taking place?
Posted by: babs
» RE: When is that makeover taking place?
Posted by: AMerrickanGirl
» RE: When is that makeover taking place?
Posted by: Vik
» RE: When is that makeover taking place?
Posted by: sirios
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mandiwrite on Apr 21, 2009 2:13 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Don't go changin'...
Posted by: mercianomad
» RE: Sounds like you been duped...
Posted by: jimidee
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HoboHomo on Apr 21, 2009 2:19 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Of course it doesn't occur to all you dufus heteros...
Posted by: cordas
» RE: Of course it doesn't occur to all you dufus heteros...
Posted by: HoboHomo
» I don't get that at all...
Posted by: nha16
» RE: I don't get that at all...
Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: Of course it doesn't occur to all you dufus heteros...
Posted by: Vik
» RE: Of course it doesn't occur to all you dufus heteros...
Posted by: HoboHomo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cordas on Apr 21, 2009 2:49 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author of this article is even worse than the PR people she lambastes for maybe wanting to pluck, style and mold Ms Boyle. That and the idiot above who is making spurious claims about her sexuality.
Ms Boyle isn't the poster girl for forgotten women, she isn't the hidden lesbian gem, she doesn't need to be polished.
I know this might sound patronising but she should be given the space and support to be who she wants to be. If she wants a make over, to go back to her cottage and cats, run for 1st world leader, whatever it should be left up to her, not some bunch of self justifying idiots looking to push their desires onto her... unless of course thats what she wants but some how I doubt it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: STOP PROJECTING!
Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: STOP PROJECTING!
Posted by: special_k
» RE: STOP PROJECTING!
Posted by: HoboHomo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Prairie Waif on Apr 21, 2009 2:50 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the writer had listened to the entire clip, Simon gives her his comment about being a "little tiger," to which a voice that sounds like a girl making a playground retort to a boy who's just told the "plain Jane" she is beautiful; Susan Boyle can be heard saying, "Oh Simon!" in a very true sounding reply.
And if you have seen any of the interviews, since her "rise to fame," you can see she is the genuine article, not some fantasy of gimmicky marketers, as was the case with Milli Vanilli who couldn't "sing" without a microphone, let alone sing on demand, without music.
As for making over her eyebrows?
If, as would most likely be a very good place for her talents, she ends up in musical theater, then she will be required to do, as all actors do, and adjust to the role they are playing.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: "It a set-up! Probably."
Posted by: Ruby
» RE: "It a set-up! Probably."
Posted by: HoboHomo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: colinsyme on Apr 21, 2009 3:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She is a small town girl with learning difficulties, not very goodlooking and who most likely had no social life.
She entered, six years in a row in the "Fauldhouse miners welfare club talent contest" and never won that contest. The miners welfare club being a typical small town working class club.
She submitted several demo discs to record companies and was rejected each time.
She entered, the talent show "my kind of people" in the late 90s and never got onto the short list.
She was going give up singing but was persuaded to have "one last shot" at BGT by her singing coach.
She attends church regularly and well loved by her local Catholic community.
Local folk who know her have told of the way she has been bullied all her life.
Why is she a success only now? well possibly we all feel guilty of how shallow and superficial the world has become, that a atractive person not that talented, will allways have an edge over an ugly person who has great talent.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: sock on the jaw for the shallow
Posted by: hagwind
» The lovely Rachel
Posted by: zipper696
» RE: The lovely Rachel
Posted by: hagwind
» RE: The lovely Rachel
Posted by: ADCS
» She is not ugly.
Posted by: ulla
» RE: She is not ugly...she's butt ugli!
Posted by: jimidee
» RE: She is not ugly...she's butt ugli!
Posted by: babs
» RE: She is not ugly.
Posted by: colinsyme
» RE: Britney?
Posted by: Longdream
» RE: She is not ugly.
Posted by: babs
» Music Is For the Ears, Not the Eyes
Posted by: Libertine
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CHD on Apr 21, 2009 5:51 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If she had been introduced as good amateur singer with years of church and choir experience and a previous released recording would your reaction be different?
As always with these shows (especially the ITV/Simon Cowell ones) the focus soon turns from the 'talent' of an individual to an exploitative expedition through their past to recount their bullying/abuse/death/abandonment sob stories in front of the camera to make them, ITV, and Mr. Cowell a bit more money. Wouldn't be surprised to see it happen in this case too.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: And you're a cynic.
Posted by: Fempatriot
» RE: And you're a cynic.
Posted by: cordas
» RE: And you're a cynic.
Posted by: CHD
» RE: It's a tv talent show. Nothing more.
Posted by: nha16
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wellaware lec on Apr 21, 2009 7:17 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Apr 21, 2009 7:22 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: SO MANY GREEN EYED MONSTERS
Posted by: athurlow
» RE: SO MANY GREEN EYED MONSTERS
Posted by: bizeeb
» RE: SO MANY GREEN EYED MONSTERS
Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: SO MANY GREEN EYED MONSTERS
Posted by: sirios
Comments are closed-
Posted by: xpress411 on Apr 21, 2009 7:42 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» No, you must form your own movement. SB WAS a victory for women, and humanity, but. . .
Posted by: Beck
» RE: No, you must form your own movement. SB WAS a victory for women, and humanity, but. . .
Posted by: bizeeb
» RE: No, you must form your own movement. SB WAS a victory for women, and humanity, but. . .
Posted by: CarlaWaters
» Oh, wow, I've gone back in time . . .
Posted by: hagwind
» You got it all wrong. I didn't say that women must submit to men.
Posted by: CarlaWaters
» RE: If you want to fight for equal rights of men and women, I'm with you.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» RE: No, you must form your own movement. SB WAS a victory for women, and humanity, but. . .
Posted by: babs
» RE: No, you must form your own movement. SB WAS a victory for women, and humanity, but. . .
Posted by: CarlaWaters
» RE: No, you must form your own movement. SB WAS a victory for women, and humanity, but. . .
Posted by: Longdream
» RE: No, you must form your own movement. SB WAS a victory for women, and humanity, but. . .
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» I haven't read her posts?
Posted by: Longdream
» A YOYO Dubya and a man-hater in one ! Get a life !
Posted by: CarlaWaters
» RE: A YOYO Dubya and a man-hater in one ! Get a life !
Posted by: babs
» RE: A YOYO Dubya and a man-hater in one ! Get a life !
Posted by: CarlaWaters
» So Beck, babs "rocks" for being negative like you? I should have known.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» RE: No, you must form your own movement. SB WAS a victory for women, and humanity, but. . .
Posted by: xpress411
» RE: No, you must form your own movement. SB WAS a victory for women, and humanity, but. . .
Posted by: CarlaWaters
» you know, I remember a number of plump and/or odd, dweeby men on these shows, yet. ..
Posted by: Beck
» More sexist talk. How about that?
Posted by: CarlaWaters
» Start sticking up for the overweight, etc., xpress. Don't expect women to do what you apparently.
Posted by: Beck
» If women of the yester years were like Beck and babs, women's rights would have never existed.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» RE: If women of the yester years were like Beck and babs, women's rights would have never existed.
Posted by: Longdream
» RE: If women of the yester years were like Beck and babs, women's rights would have never existed.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» RE: If women of the yester years were like Beck and babs, women's rights would have never existed.
Posted by: Longdream
» Exactly ! This site has a serious weakness of being too female-only biased.
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» RE: Men ALSO feel unappreciated, ignored, and ridiculed by modern society!!!!!!
Posted by: HoboHomo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Apr 21, 2009 7:47 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That said, it's just another television program, folks. Reality tee vee, at that, in which the creativity and art are largely limited to the insults and praise by three mafRIAA tycoons.
Oh well. American Idol(atry) marches onward. At least we aren't lopping the heads off journalists and stoning abuse victims as a rule.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: QQOblivion on Apr 21, 2009 7:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A Man Speaks
Posted by: HoboHomo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Fempatriot on Apr 21, 2009 8:03 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Shut Up
Posted by: nen
» RE: Shut Up
Posted by: babs
» No, this is an article about a group of American women
Posted by: suprmark
» RE: As a fellow penis-owner...
Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Tina Brown and her left-handed compliments
Posted by: phatkhat
» RE: Tina Brown and her left-handed compliments
Posted by: Fempatriot
» RE: Tina Brown and her left-handed compliments
Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: Tina Brown and her left-handed compliments
Posted by: sirios
Comments are closed-
Posted by: waterflaws on Apr 21, 2009 8:09 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NamVeT on Apr 21, 2009 8:40 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This ordinary
Posted by: DaBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: donnambirdlady on Apr 21, 2009 8:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is hard on celebrities of beauty but ordinary talent like Brittany Spears who are pushed and marketed to death and makes fame nearly impossible for those with talent but looks that are less than stunning.
I recall a few years ago a very talented friend of mine, Ginny Mitchell produced a beautiful CD. Great songs, wonderfully performed with some fairly famous friends of hers in the backup band. The CD won a music award in Canada but only got play on one local radio station in the US. Her CD was not a big seller, even in her hometown but it is one of my all time favorites. I have often thought that the only reason it was not a huge success is that she is attractive, but in a very ordinary way. Average looks, I guess don't sell with the big record companies. Too bad, she is a gem of a person with great talent. The last I heard she was performing for the elderly in nursing homes.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ceti on Apr 21, 2009 9:15 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ms_happy on Apr 21, 2009 9:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: She had the makeover before the show...
Posted by: jimidee
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Libertine on Apr 21, 2009 10:09 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With a talent like Boyle's, it doesn't (or shouldn't) matter what she looks like. She's the real deal. The entertainment world is chock full of vacuous pretty girls with only the barest modicum of singing talent, but a talent like Boyle's is a rarity and should be valued for the treasure it is.
Indeed, the outer packaging is of supreme importance for the dime-a-dozen bimbo singers, precisely because their talent is mediocre at best, and the flashy appearance is to make audiences forget their less than stellar vocal skills.
As far as I'm concerned, the singing world needs more Susan Boyles and fewer Ashlee Simpsons.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Hecate_magika on Apr 21, 2009 11:43 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BlueTigress on Apr 21, 2009 11:55 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A lot of bands from the '70s were not formed by good-looking people. You couldn't tell by listening to the records.
Then MTV came along and the emphasis went to the visuals.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: MTV messaging
Posted by: morticia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hilaryuk on Apr 21, 2009 12:51 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MJ Fields on Apr 21, 2009 1:00 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Nice diversion, AlterNet
Posted by: babs
» RE: Nice diversion, AlterNet
Posted by: Benn_Miller
» I agree!
Posted by: waterflaws
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gravitas on Apr 21, 2009 2:38 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Leave it to the mainstream media (MSM) to take the poignancy out of the moment. We love her, we watch her over and over, we are reduced to tears. But some media cynics just don’t get it. Kind of like how the pre Christmas Eve Scrooge was unable to see what most dogs and kids knew all along. They tell us that we are overreacting, and tritely dismiss her popularity as coming from the disparity between how she looks and how she sounds.
I say NOT SO FAST! I think this is more than just a morality lite sound bite, “can’t judge a book by its cover;” we should have known that what was in the package with the plain wrapping was better than what was in the one with the fancy ribbons. We are humbled at her magical Seraphine like voice because we are reacting to the power of our own experience. Yes, we are taught to obsess on all the wrong things: looks, fame, fortune, power and a whole list of other externals. But we don’t just judge others on those things, we judge ourselves as well. How many of us have shackled our dreams because we don’t feel adequate enough? (Insert pretty, thin, young etc here!) Everyone knows if you don’t have the right props you won’t succeed. Be a good little person and bow out until someone finds the right product you can buy to fix yourself. When someone just like us dares; well, how dare they? We cringe with resentment; deep down, we would never have the nerve. And yet, when she opened her mouth to sing (or let the angels sing through her), all that melted away. She dashed all our defenses, pierced a million pretenses. Dysfunctional cultural delusions crumbled faster than credit default swaps because they couldn’t hold up to the moment of truth. Real greatness comes only from the heart and the soul. And when one has this, all else is eclipsed.
The lesson of Susan could never be more salient than at this very moment. Our society is falling under the weight of its own lies. Corruption, cheating, dishonesty everywhere we look. What isn’t a lie anymore? From the products we buy to the politicians who are bought off, nothing is as it seems. As we walk through the fog of fraud, we stumble upon authenticity and are stunned by it. We weep because we are still able to recognize it. This isn’t like how our taste buds have been so deadened by processed food the natural doesn’t taste right to us anymore. We still respond to real beauty! We are not soul dead yet. Maybe we will be o.k. We just need to stop listening to those leading us down false paths for their own agendas and listen to our own inner wisdom. I think Susan really is an angel in disguise letting us know the only thing we can trust is the sincerity deep within ourselves. If we follow that, it is not too late to find our way home.
Susan’s performance is a modern day archetypical moment. But I hope we are careful in choosing the right fairy tale. MSM is only too happy to use the rags to riches cliché of Cinderella. But this goes way beyond Cinderella. This is the Buddha as beggar, the goddess as goat herder. This lesson is a reminder of the inextricable link between greatness, humility and simplicity. Leave the Cinderellas to the commercial sponsors. Although Sleeping Beauty may not too far off, because Susan’s true greatness can only be appreciated by the pure of heart.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Apr 21, 2009 2:48 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Apr 21, 2009 2:53 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Too True
Posted by: Gravitas
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Blondinista on Apr 21, 2009 3:30 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In fact, hers was a sweet victory for anyone, regardless of gender, who was ever laughed at, bullied, ridiculed, or disparaged for being not pretty enough or thin enough, or rich enough, or stylish enough... etc...
From all of us underdogs -- Susan, you rock!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: navy-vet on Apr 21, 2009 3:47 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Then there's English opera star Jane Eaglen. In a day when opera stars are expected to be slinky slim, beautiful, and also vocally powerful (not easy when you're skinny), we still have wonderful Jane. Yep, overweight, plain, dumpy, maybe not too convincing as consumptive Mimi, but what a voice!!
Now we have Susan, whose vocal power resembles Kate's and Jane's. And she sings for the world. God bless Susan Boyle.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Look at Maria Callas, another opera singer
Posted by: rclord
» RE: Poor Maria Callas
Posted by: navy-vet
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Benn_Miller on Apr 21, 2009 4:31 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: outlook on Apr 21, 2009 4:31 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: irenicus on Apr 21, 2009 5:04 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Longdream on Apr 21, 2009 5:08 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I though Susan was cute, and funny, and very charming the way she said, Simon!, and You, too, Amanda?! and stood up for herself.
My wish for her is that she gets to do what she wants. If she wants to pluck and get new hair, fine. If not, fine. Just like with a wonderful, haunting mezzo soprano or a brilliant tenor, the outer trappings won't get in the way of the outpouring of love for what Susan can do, and I think her appearance, whatever you make of it, is only a small part of what draws people to her.
Susan, long may you run!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TheLimit on Apr 21, 2009 6:35 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's different here? Is the perception that putting her eyebrows straight is going to improve the voice? Or are we just so totally obsessed that we can't get past our eyes to feast our ears?
The woman has an altogether lovely voice, and some vocal skills to go with it.
Eat your heart out Paul Potts.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: J- on Apr 21, 2009 7:21 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Record labels under the guidance of the WWII generation didn't have these debates or discussions. That generation gave us labels that allowed the Miles Davis, Led Zepplin, Rolling Stones, Janis Joplin's and Iggy Pop's of the world to make music, rather than be an image.
If you want to place blame on why talent like Susan Boyle is so oft ignored for the size-zero-computer-enhanced "singer", you only have to look towards the Baby Boomer executives and their lust for the short term gain. Their desire to fore-go artist developement to increase quarter over quarter profits.
I know, I've been there. I've seen it first hand.
You can go ahead and try and fill in whatever cause you want, but at the end of the day, it will always relate back to Boomer greed at the expense of artistry.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gypsyfred on Apr 22, 2009 12:35 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Do You Know Anything About Women?
Posted by: Gravitas
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sharmuse on Apr 22, 2009 7:13 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: adonisna on Apr 23, 2009 1:19 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mikeblack on Apr 23, 2009 12:16 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The captured captain being saved and pilot able to stop a crash were great and all. But when the media chooses to put those stories on loop in between entertainment news, murdered child news and missing hottie of the month news. Then it's no longer news. It's infotainment that has been a plague since the early 90s days of The Menedez Brothers, Amy Fisher, Jon Benet Ramsey and OJ Simpson. Including stuff like that is fine, as long as you don't make it the total focus of current events. But that's all you get for the majority of your news programming on mainstream media.
But this Susan Boyle crap.....there is absolutely zero reason why this needs to be focused on. It's an entertainment story so regulate it to Entertainment Tonight and Access Hollywood. What exactly is news worthy about this? That men are shallow and find her ugly or that people think middle aged virgins are humorous? No, really?!
Now this dumb crap has invaded Alternet. Keep infotainment away from here, please. The Octo-Mom had more relevance to society than some amateur singer with *GASP!* bushy eyebrows.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Updated: Catholic Bishops Embrace Anti-Abortion Terrorizers Missy Smith and Randall Terry
10 Defining Feminist Moments of 2009
Going Undercover in the Crazy, Tragic World of Christian Gay-Conversion Therapy




