Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Reproductive Justice and Gender

Why Susan Boyle Has Captured Hearts Around the World

By Tina Brown, The Daily Beast. Posted April 21, 2009.


Susan's joyous little jig spoke for millions of women who feel unappreciated, ignored, and ridiculed by modern society.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Will Susan Boyle's epic moment last week on Britain's Got Talent (not a BBC show) turn out to be a choreographed piece of TV manipulation? Probably. But that'll just mean that something false gave rise to something true.

Captain Richard Phillips of the good ship Maersk Alabama—and Sully Sullenberger splashing down his crippled airliner in the Hudson River—broke through the poisonous smog of economic depression and Wall Street skullduggery with a reminder that pure individual heroism is a daily occurrence if we know where to look for it. Susan Boyle is another avatar of global yearning.

The YouTube clip of Susan's angel voice soaring from the unkissed mouth of that scrunchy-faced, eyebrow-enforested, unprepossessingly dumpy representative of anonymous humanity was the third irresistible message to us all to get over ourselves. Until things get better, we will all go on being unusually receptive to such epiphanies from the news. They remind us what uncomplicated strength of character looks like.

The surge for Boyle reinforces the point again: We're all getting sick of being bullied by bad values. Sick of disappearing everyone who's plain or strange or not one of the cool crowd. This hero was no Captain Courageous. She just had to fight against being plain and a bit odd from mild early brain damage.

There is a passionate desire from Ms. Boyle's new fans all over the blogosphere not to see her subjected to the seemingly inevitable show business makeover. Keep that frumpy little dress! Don't let some mincing beautician-to-the-stars rip out those exploding eyebrows!

Among the many underdog groups Boyle scored with was that universally dismissed demographic—Invisible Women: the unbeautiful 47 year-olds who don't rate a second look and never get a chance to make their point in the meeting. There are so many aging women who feel dissed by popular culture and employers alike. Much of Hillary Clinton's strength in the 2008 campaign was built on this overlooked demographic. Unwanted by TV shows, advertisers, movies, and corporate recruiters, Invisible Women feel that their experience—often holding families together while doing the work that puts bigger egos in the corner office—goes not just unrewarded but unrecognized.  Can't they at least see me? goes the voice in their heads. Especially after all those wasted hours trying to look younger, slimmer, and better dressed just to get their rightful desserts.

That's why it brought tears to our eyes when Susan Boyle presented herself to the Roman mob and proved that its low expectations of her were unfounded. That little jig she did at the end of her appearance was a victory dance. It reminded me of a very different moment, a political one: the feeling in the room when Hillary won her victory in the Ohio primary. The auditorium that night was crammed with jubilant middle-aged women pumping their fists to the raucous sound of Aretha Franklin belting out RESPECT. How Hillary—with her elite education, stellar career, and eight years in the White House—could come to represent the Forgotten Women is an index of how hungrily they sought one.

It will of course be only a matter of months before Susan Boyle's eyebrows get a pluck job—and a new wave of reality television co-opts "authenticity" as the fake new thing. Yesterday's New York Times told how last fall MTV convened an urgent executive meeting to discuss how to scare up some positive social messaging from their glitz-peddling reality shows.

What a drag. We wanted to keep the Susan Boyle moment for ourselves. If it was an illusion, at least it was our illusion. It made us feel so much better than theirs will.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: women, hillary clinton, susan boyle, dreams, singing

Tina Brown is the founder and editor in chief of The Daily Beast. She is the author of the 2007 New York Times bestseller The Diana Chronicles. Brown is the former editor of Tatler, Vanity Fair, The New Yorker, and Talk magazines and host of CNBC's Topic A with Tina Brown.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Reproductive Justice and Gender! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
YAWN ! It's all about women only. Well, time for me to slobber another philly cheese steak !
Posted by: FLYING DOOFUS on Apr 21, 2009 12:09 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And Ms. Boyle can shut up and have some as well. OOOOOOOOO ! LOL !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Women only Posted by: kepstein7777
» RE: Women only Posted by: Dr. P. Mooney
Hilary would be president if women wanted Hilary to be president.
Posted by: Honky The Antichrist on Apr 21, 2009 12:52 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“…with her… eight years at the White House”… Ha

Since women are the majority, they have the ability to put however they want in the White House. Women, like everyone else, realize that Hilary is nothing more than a snake in the grass. If she had any value, she would have divorced her husband after he humiliated her in front of everyone on the planet. Instead, she tried to ride his coattail and name to the White House.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» ?????? Posted by: Beck
When is that makeover taking place?
Posted by: countingdaisies on Apr 21, 2009 1:17 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's no reason why she can't look beautiful as well as sing beautiful!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Posted by: nha16
» RE: When is that makeover taking place? Posted by: AMerrickanGirl
Don't go changin'...
Posted by: mandiwrite on Apr 21, 2009 2:13 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Forget the idiot posters and their predictable responses - rejoice with me! Susan Boyle is a sock in the eye to the bling-and-glitz that dominates our lives, that constantly whacks us with this false belief that looks are everything. I've watched in amazement as girls with very ordinary and untrained voices shoot to the top of the charts, based primarily on how much airbrushed flesh they show in their dvds and how 'cool' they are. Susan is a sense of perspective on the sickness of our times - a glorious talent that doesn't come gift-wrapped in the shiny paper we've come to expect. Susan, they're not fit to shine your shoes - take a bow!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Don't go changin'... Posted by: mercianomad
Of course it doesn't occur to all you dufus heteros...
Posted by: HoboHomo on Apr 21, 2009 2:19 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that Ms. Boyle is lesbian. A credit to our gay community.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I don't get that at all... Posted by: HoboHomo
STOP PROJECTING!
Posted by: cordas on Apr 21, 2009 2:49 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WTF? Leave Ms. Boyle alone to be the person SHE WANTS TO BE!

The author of this article is even worse than the PR people she lambastes for maybe wanting to pluck, style and mold Ms Boyle. That and the idiot above who is making spurious claims about her sexuality.

Ms Boyle isn't the poster girl for forgotten women, she isn't the hidden lesbian gem, she doesn't need to be polished.

I know this might sound patronising but she should be given the space and support to be who she wants to be. If she wants a make over, to go back to her cottage and cats, run for 1st world leader, whatever it should be left up to her, not some bunch of self justifying idiots looking to push their desires onto her... unless of course thats what she wants but some how I doubt it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: STOP PROJECTING! Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: STOP PROJECTING! Posted by: special_k
» RE: STOP PROJECTING! Posted by: HoboHomo
"It a set-up! Probably."
Posted by: Prairie Waif on Apr 21, 2009 2:50 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think so.
If the writer had listened to the entire clip, Simon gives her his comment about being a "little tiger," to which a voice that sounds like a girl making a playground retort to a boy who's just told the "plain Jane" she is beautiful; Susan Boyle can be heard saying, "Oh Simon!" in a very true sounding reply.

And if you have seen any of the interviews, since her "rise to fame," you can see she is the genuine article, not some fantasy of gimmicky marketers, as was the case with Milli Vanilli who couldn't "sing" without a microphone, let alone sing on demand, without music.

As for making over her eyebrows?
If, as would most likely be a very good place for her talents, she ends up in musical theater, then she will be required to do, as all actors do, and adjust to the role they are playing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "It a set-up! Probably." Posted by: HoboHomo
sock on the jaw for the shallow
Posted by: colinsyme on Apr 21, 2009 3:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To all those people who think that her success was somehow "engineered" these are some of the facts as l know them:
She is a small town girl with learning difficulties, not very goodlooking and who most likely had no social life.
She entered, six years in a row in the "Fauldhouse miners welfare club talent contest" and never won that contest. The miners welfare club being a typical small town working class club.
She submitted several demo discs to record companies and was rejected each time.
She entered, the talent show "my kind of people" in the late 90s and never got onto the short list.
She was going give up singing but was persuaded to have "one last shot" at BGT by her singing coach.
She attends church regularly and well loved by her local Catholic community.
Local folk who know her have told of the way she has been bullied all her life.
Why is she a success only now? well possibly we all feel guilty of how shallow and superficial the world has become, that a atractive person not that talented, will allways have an edge over an ugly person who has great talent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The lovely Rachel Posted by: zipper696
» RE: The lovely Rachel Posted by: hagwind
» RE: The lovely Rachel Posted by: ADCS
» She is not ugly. Posted by: ulla
» RE: She is not ugly. Posted by: colinsyme
» RE: Britney? Posted by: Longdream
» RE: She is not ugly. Posted by: babs
It's a tv talent show. Nothing more.
Posted by: CHD on Apr 21, 2009 5:51 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Her particular segment was very well edited and put together. You could see Ant and Dec knew something (having probably seen her doing a warm up). It used a type of incidental music and performer & audience cut shots to set up a particular expectation in the viewers mind and then knocked that over.

If she had been introduced as good amateur singer with years of church and choir experience and a previous released recording would your reaction be different?

As always with these shows (especially the ITV/Simon Cowell ones) the focus soon turns from the 'talent' of an individual to an exploitative expedition through their past to recount their bullying/abuse/death/abandonment sob stories in front of the camera to make them, ITV, and Mr. Cowell a bit more money. Wouldn't be surprised to see it happen in this case too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: And you're a cynic. Posted by: Fempatriot
» RE: And you're a cynic. Posted by: cordas
SO MUCH MORE WORTHY OF PRESS SPACE THAN SARAH...
Posted by: wellaware lec on Apr 21, 2009 7:17 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THIS is the kind of thing that is uplifting and we need that these days. Thank you to ALTERNET for showing a bit of wisdom here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SO MANY GREEN EYED MONSTERS
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Apr 21, 2009 7:22 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So the judges went from "you gotta be kidding" to "holy sh--" in less than a minute. It doesn't happen often but it's instant fame. I do wonder why that offends so many people. Is everyone out there drop dead georgeous? I doubt it. Can anyone sing that well, definitely not. Give the lady the credit she deserves. It's right out of a story book. Gotta love it! ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Men ALSO feel unappreciated, ignored, and ridiculed by modern society!!!!!!
Posted by: xpress411 on Apr 21, 2009 7:42 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stop making issues like these into a woman's club. There are intelligent men out there that support woman. Susan Boyle was a victory for all humanity, not just woman. Take a look around your office, you'll find plenty of over weight, unappreciated, ignored and ridiculed men, that don't even get in the meetings.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I haven't read her posts? Posted by: Longdream
» More sexist talk. How about that? Posted by: CarlaWaters
She's excellent and exceptional at what she does.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Apr 21, 2009 7:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Exceptional folks and those who strive for excellence--in general--still engender fascination and adoration by many amongst us who settle for mediocrity.

That said, it's just another television program, folks. Reality tee vee, at that, in which the creativity and art are largely limited to the insults and praise by three mafRIAA tycoons.

Oh well. American Idol(atry) marches onward. At least we aren't lopping the heads off journalists and stoning abuse victims as a rule.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Man Speaks
Posted by: QQOblivion on Apr 21, 2009 7:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the recent comment about this being a victory for less-than-attractive men too. I am a short plump man who rejoices in Boyle's success. Most people aren't as pretty as the teens on the Real World, FYI. THAT is why she has hit the right note with a lot of us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Man Speaks Posted by: HoboHomo
Tina Brown and her left-handed compliments
Posted by: Fempatriot on Apr 21, 2009 8:03 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Scrunchy-faced?" "Eyebrown Enforested?" With compliments like that, give me some criticism any day. Well, she is no Angelina Jolie, but I'll bet Ms. Brown isn't either. And her voice is glorious. As is her soul. That's why, unlike most men, women appreciate Susan Boyle. We look beyond the face. Poor males are hard-wired to mostly look at the face...after a good long hard look at the figure. It's a pity. There are millions of us Susan Boyles out here who may not be able to sing, but we sure could make our men happy...their loss!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Shut Up Posted by: nen
» RE: Shut Up Posted by: babs
» RE: As a fellow penis-owner... Posted by: Longdream
Quit pimping for The Daily Beast already!!
Posted by: waterflaws on Apr 21, 2009 8:09 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Daily Beast is just another corporate news outlet. Why is Alternet pimping for it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This ordinary
Posted by: NamVeT on Apr 21, 2009 8:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
middle aged woman blew my socks off! It was such a joy and total surprise. I've been a musician (guitar) for 50 years or so. The first time I watched her sing I was in shock. I think the old adage "You can't judge a book by it's cover" most definately applies here. I wish her all the happiness and joy that she so much deserves. More power to her. Any time that you may be feeling down or like the world is against you...just watch the video again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This ordinary Posted by: DaBear
A Revelation of hidden human value
Posted by: donnambirdlady on Apr 21, 2009 8:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that the reason that this affects us so profoundly is that our culture has degraded so far that we dismiss people who are not perfect or beautiful, male or female. Susan Boyle reminds us that many of the people we are in the habit of dismissing have unrevealed talents and unrecognized value. Singers are especially honored but only if they are physically beautiful too.

It is hard on celebrities of beauty but ordinary talent like Brittany Spears who are pushed and marketed to death and makes fame nearly impossible for those with talent but looks that are less than stunning.

I recall a few years ago a very talented friend of mine, Ginny Mitchell produced a beautiful CD. Great songs, wonderfully performed with some fairly famous friends of hers in the backup band. The CD won a music award in Canada but only got play on one local radio station in the US. Her CD was not a big seller, even in her hometown but it is one of my all time favorites. I have often thought that the only reason it was not a huge success is that she is attractive, but in a very ordinary way. Average looks, I guess don't sell with the big record companies. Too bad, she is a gem of a person with great talent. The last I heard she was performing for the elderly in nursing homes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Proles
Posted by: ceti on Apr 21, 2009 9:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Susan Boyle reminded me of the most moving scene in 1984 where Winston and Julia look out on an dowdy washerwoman, singing while hanging clothes up in her backyard. Winston remarks that "If there is hope, it lies in the proles. If they could become conscious of their own strength, they would have no need to conspire. History does not matter to them." Unfortunately, everything else in the book reflects Big Brother's (reality tv?) absolute control over the masses who are incapable of organizing any sustained resistance. But rebellious Party members like Winston and the heartstrings of the American middle classes constantly project and dream of a more authentic reality and hopeful outcome. The phenomenon of Susan Boyle reflects this same yearning.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good Morning America
Posted by: ms_happy on Apr 21, 2009 9:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
GMA already gave her a makeover. Go and google "Good Morning America" "Susan Boyle". It's slight but noticeable. She's still got that inner beauty, don't worry about that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pretty Girls Are a Dime a Dozen
Posted by: Libertine on Apr 21, 2009 10:09 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good for Susan Boyle. Kudos to her for shutting up Simon Cowell for once in his life and for showing the phonies in the audience that musical talent -- or talent of any kind -- is not tied to a person's appearance. She has yet again proven the truth of the old saying, "Don't judge a book by its cover.".

With a talent like Boyle's, it doesn't (or shouldn't) matter what she looks like. She's the real deal. The entertainment world is chock full of vacuous pretty girls with only the barest modicum of singing talent, but a talent like Boyle's is a rarity and should be valued for the treasure it is.

Indeed, the outer packaging is of supreme importance for the dime-a-dozen bimbo singers, precisely because their talent is mediocre at best, and the flashy appearance is to make audiences forget their less than stellar vocal skills.

As far as I'm concerned, the singing world needs more Susan Boyles and fewer Ashlee Simpsons.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Running with the crowd = devolution
Posted by: Hecate_magika on Apr 21, 2009 11:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the phrase I like most in the article: "We're all getting sick of being bullied by bad values." To me it alludes to the sickness of groupthink. Sociologists can have at me if they like, but I feel it's the outsiders who have contributed most to our social well being. Common sense always seems to fly out the window where groups are involved. If there is not someone on the sidelines of the whole mess looking in, there can be no objectivity. Peer pressure is the furthest thing from intelligence. Susan, even with her so-called learning difficulties, has managed to shine a light on our morally bankrupt culture. I'm glad we managed to listen to her for a minute and stop thinking about buying our kids the latest and coolest brand of sneakers. And yes, that kind of shallow thinking still haunts us, even in this economy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MTV messaging
Posted by: BlueTigress on Apr 21, 2009 11:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They're the ones that started this mess!

A lot of bands from the '70s were not formed by good-looking people. You couldn't tell by listening to the records.

Then MTV came along and the emphasis went to the visuals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: MTV messaging Posted by: morticia
Homogenised looks were not always the rule.
Posted by: hilaryuk on Apr 21, 2009 12:51 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gather round children.................a singer didn't always have to attain a kind of homogenised plastic beauty approved by the media. Once, strange as it may seem, the quality of the voice mattered. For instance, Edith Piaf was a dumpy little woman, but her voice could make your skin prickle and she sustained an extended career.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nice diversion, AlterNet
Posted by: MJ Fields on Apr 21, 2009 1:00 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now can we get back to the important things that impact our lives? If I want to read about Susan Boyle there are only thousands of other websites I can go to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Nice diversion, AlterNet Posted by: Benn_Miller
» I agree! Posted by: waterflaws
Loved Tina Brown's Analysis
Posted by: Gravitas on Apr 21, 2009 2:38 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And would like to share my own as well:

Leave it to the mainstream media (MSM) to take the poignancy out of the moment. We love her, we watch her over and over, we are reduced to tears. But some media cynics just don’t get it. Kind of like how the pre Christmas Eve Scrooge was unable to see what most dogs and kids knew all along. They tell us that we are overreacting, and tritely dismiss her popularity as coming from the disparity between how she looks and how she sounds.

I say NOT SO FAST! I think this is more than just a morality lite sound bite, “can’t judge a book by its cover;” we should have known that what was in the package with the plain wrapping was better than what was in the one with the fancy ribbons. We are humbled at her magical Seraphine like voice because we are reacting to the power of our own experience. Yes, we are taught to obsess on all the wrong things: looks, fame, fortune, power and a whole list of other externals. But we don’t just judge others on those things, we judge ourselves as well. How many of us have shackled our dreams because we don’t feel adequate enough? (Insert pretty, thin, young etc here!) Everyone knows if you don’t have the right props you won’t succeed. Be a good little person and bow out until someone finds the right product you can buy to fix yourself. When someone just like us dares; well, how dare they? We cringe with resentment; deep down, we would never have the nerve. And yet, when she opened her mouth to sing (or let the angels sing through her), all that melted away. She dashed all our defenses, pierced a million pretenses. Dysfunctional cultural delusions crumbled faster than credit default swaps because they couldn’t hold up to the moment of truth. Real greatness comes only from the heart and the soul. And when one has this, all else is eclipsed.

The lesson of Susan could never be more salient than at this very moment. Our society is falling under the weight of its own lies. Corruption, cheating, dishonesty everywhere we look. What isn’t a lie anymore? From the products we buy to the politicians who are bought off, nothing is as it seems. As we walk through the fog of fraud, we stumble upon authenticity and are stunned by it. We weep because we are still able to recognize it. This isn’t like how our taste buds have been so deadened by processed food the natural doesn’t taste right to us anymore. We still respond to real beauty! We are not soul dead yet. Maybe we will be o.k. We just need to stop listening to those leading us down false paths for their own agendas and listen to our own inner wisdom. I think Susan really is an angel in disguise letting us know the only thing we can trust is the sincerity deep within ourselves. If we follow that, it is not too late to find our way home.

Susan’s performance is a modern day archetypical moment. But I hope we are careful in choosing the right fairy tale. MSM is only too happy to use the rags to riches cliché of Cinderella. But this goes way beyond Cinderella. This is the Buddha as beggar, the goddess as goat herder. This lesson is a reminder of the inextricable link between greatness, humility and simplicity. Leave the Cinderellas to the commercial sponsors. Although Sleeping Beauty may not too far off, because Susan’s true greatness can only be appreciated by the pure of heart.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh, Tina, shame on you for sullying quality with a Clinton comparé
Posted by: DaBear on Apr 21, 2009 2:48 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hillary is NO Susan Boyle, god dammit. Susan's all QUALITY, thank you very much.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I've been vindicated by yet another Scot
Posted by: DaBear on Apr 21, 2009 2:53 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Quality comes from the heart and you can recognize it in someone's eyes. One look at Susan Boyle proves it. She had me from the moment she was on camera. The voice was just icing.... of the best kind indeed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Too True Posted by: Gravitas
My new hero...
Posted by: Blondinista on Apr 21, 2009 3:30 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She strode out on stage, self-confident and sassy, and knocked one out of the park for the entire sisterhood of ignored and invisible middle-aged women.

In fact, hers was a sweet victory for anyone, regardless of gender, who was ever laughed at, bullied, ridiculed, or disparaged for being not pretty enough or thin enough, or rich enough, or stylish enough... etc...

From all of us underdogs -- Susan, you rock!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

God Bless THE WORLD!
Posted by: navy-vet on Apr 21, 2009 3:47 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone else old enough to remember Kate Smith, the 30s and 40s radio singer? Fat, a bit frumpy, plain, wistfully in love with her married announcer for years but too Catholic to do anything about it (so we heard). She's the one who made "God Bless America" famous during WWII. I consider that song jingoist, but her VOICE--wow.

Then there's English opera star Jane Eaglen. In a day when opera stars are expected to be slinky slim, beautiful, and also vocally powerful (not easy when you're skinny), we still have wonderful Jane. Yep, overweight, plain, dumpy, maybe not too convincing as consumptive Mimi, but what a voice!!

Now we have Susan, whose vocal power resembles Kate's and Jane's. And she sings for the world. God bless Susan Boyle.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Poor Maria Callas Posted by: navy-vet
Susan Boyle is just another overhyped celebrity.
Posted by: Benn_Miller on Apr 21, 2009 4:31 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There have been plenty of men and women around the world doing everything Boyle had only done in the recent years. Why does it have to take a monied celebrity to capture minds and hearts all over the world anyway? I also notice a lot of anti-men comments and as a man, I find it truly offensive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

An opportunity for Victoria Beckham to witness real talent
Posted by: outlook on Apr 21, 2009 4:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its likely that Susan Boyle will be subjected to some grooming but, with her talent, she has no need to turn herself into a plastic Barbie.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Et tu, Alternet?
Posted by: irenicus on Apr 21, 2009 5:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I went to a Folk Festival a couple of weeks ago where there were heaps of ugly people with talent -- while popular, there certainly wasn't 100 million people there (or whatever the festival equivalent to website hits is). Point is, talent is always out there when you look for it, but why does it take the focus of the MSM to make it legitimate? I know plenty of intelligent people that are suckered into this way of thinking (including, it seems, the people at Alternet). It just does not make sense to me. Write an article on that!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Opera is a little different.
Posted by: Longdream on Apr 21, 2009 5:08 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The voice is the thing. The vessel--not so much. It's easier for an uninformed or uninvolved person when a young, slim woman is singing a character that's supposed to be young and beautiful, but it's not necessary. Opera is about the emotions, and the voice, the voice, the voice. Opera performers also act their asses off, and it's the only place where you can absolutely FORGET that the person singing doesn't look like the character.

I though Susan was cute, and funny, and very charming the way she said, Simon!, and You, too, Amanda?! and stood up for herself.

My wish for her is that she gets to do what she wants. If she wants to pluck and get new hair, fine. If not, fine. Just like with a wonderful, haunting mezzo soprano or a brilliant tenor, the outer trappings won't get in the way of the outpouring of love for what Susan can do, and I think her appearance, whatever you make of it, is only a small part of what draws people to her.

Susan, long may you run!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What I love best
Posted by: TheLimit on Apr 21, 2009 6:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is that having heard, and been supposedly captivated by the voice, there is 99.9% obsession about her frumpy looks.

What's different here? Is the perception that putting her eyebrows straight is going to improve the voice? Or are we just so totally obsessed that we can't get past our eyes to feast our ears?

The woman has an altogether lovely voice, and some vocal skills to go with it.

Eat your heart out Paul Potts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ugh, This is strictly generational
Posted by: J- on Apr 21, 2009 7:21 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's face it...

Record labels under the guidance of the WWII generation didn't have these debates or discussions. That generation gave us labels that allowed the Miles Davis, Led Zepplin, Rolling Stones, Janis Joplin's and Iggy Pop's of the world to make music, rather than be an image.

If you want to place blame on why talent like Susan Boyle is so oft ignored for the size-zero-computer-enhanced "singer", you only have to look towards the Baby Boomer executives and their lust for the short term gain. Their desire to fore-go artist developement to increase quarter over quarter profits.

I know, I've been there. I've seen it first hand.

You can go ahead and try and fill in whatever cause you want, but at the end of the day, it will always relate back to Boomer greed at the expense of artistry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

oh, come on
Posted by: gypsyfred on Apr 22, 2009 12:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How could a woman who attended Edinburgh Acting School and appeared in the Fringe Festival as well as a previous attempt to make it big, be THAT untouched (re: Weekend Guardian)? If you really look at her face and dress, it is easy to see that this is not an unattractive woman but the postmodern version of that old secretary look from the movies, in days gone by. The old look had her hair pulled back severely, dark rimmed glasses and a frumpy suit. In those movies our heroine hair is tumbles down and her glasses removed by a man who sees through her disguise. Susan Boyle's audience would have seen through that image, so, she has a hair cut that maximizes the squareness of her face, unplucked eyebrows, and a silly frumpy dress that is designed to make her look unshapely. She, too, at some later date will be a unmasked as an attractive woman. This is a media hype job if there ever was one....and more power to her; she's got a great voice and has managed to pull off the whole package. Yea for her.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sharmuse
Posted by: sharmuse on Apr 22, 2009 7:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think the Susan Boyle phenomenon is only about women. Men suffer from the same treatment based on their not-conventionally- beautiful looks. I was particularly inspired by Susan's performance, as a singer who started feeling old at the ripe age of 23, already too old to try out for this or that. Walking up to the music section of J&R Music World a few years ago, if I didn't know it was a music store, I would have thought it was a brothel, from all the pictures of scantily clad young women on the wall along the staircase. I'm in the interesting position of having been both unattractive and attractive. Experiencing life on both ends of the attractiveness scale is a mind blow - there are problems at both ends. It has been a challenge for me as a singer in the age of American Idol and rap, where so much of what I was taught about singing and songwriting, and which I respect, has gone out the pop window. Susan Boyle stands as a pillar of hope for many I'm sure. It was stunning to watch the jeers and the surprise from the audience when she opened her mouth and a beautiful sound came out. In my world that's not such a shocking thing. There are many talented artists of all shapes and sizes who are not working because the opportunities don't exist. I sing for peace and environmental health - try making a living at that! I also sing classical music. Unless you live in Europe, fat chance of making a living even if you're not the "fat lady". But we need to sing and express ourselves in a healthy way. We need to give ourselves permission to express our hearts as Susan did. I think the world would be a more sane and peaceful place if we all felt we had permission to do that. Learning how to use the voice as a musical instrument is a great thing to do, too. It's very rewarding when you can produce the sound you want to produce. You can check me out online at www.sharmuse.com, www.sharonabreu.com and www.youtube.com/sharmuse. In Peace and Harmony,

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I like her
Posted by: adonisna on Apr 23, 2009 1:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I like her voice

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why is this crap on Alternet?
Posted by: mikeblack on Apr 23, 2009 12:16 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ugh, this article made me want to barf.

The captured captain being saved and pilot able to stop a crash were great and all. But when the media chooses to put those stories on loop in between entertainment news, murdered child news and missing hottie of the month news. Then it's no longer news. It's infotainment that has been a plague since the early 90s days of The Menedez Brothers, Amy Fisher, Jon Benet Ramsey and OJ Simpson. Including stuff like that is fine, as long as you don't make it the total focus of current events. But that's all you get for the majority of your news programming on mainstream media.

But this Susan Boyle crap.....there is absolutely zero reason why this needs to be focused on. It's an entertainment story so regulate it to Entertainment Tonight and Access Hollywood. What exactly is news worthy about this? That men are shallow and find her ugly or that people think middle aged virgins are humorous? No, really?!

Now this dumb crap has invaded Alternet. Keep infotainment away from here, please. The Octo-Mom had more relevance to society than some amateur singer with *GASP!* bushy eyebrows.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement