COMMENTS: 277
My Uterus, Husband and I All Agree -- No Children
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Reproductive Justice headlines via email.
I am a woman. I have all the biological requirements to have a child. Yet, I do not have the instincts or rational desire to do so. Does that make me less of a woman to not want to have a child either by using my body, my eggs, or my money to adopt?
My parents are the only people who, when I said I didn’t want to have kids, responded with, "Sounds like a good idea." They married because I was on the way and had two more after me. They know how hard it is to raise kids, but they also love us very much. They wouldn’t change what had happened, but they wouldn’t force their want for a grandchild on me. Besides they have two already (I’m off the hook!)
How many times have I heard after saying that I don’t want children:
* "Oh, I’m sorry." Sorry for what? I’ve made a conscious choice and I’m proud to have the courage (because that’s what it takes in this society) to say no.
* "Don’t you like kids?" LOVE ’EM! They’re cute, huggable, sweet smelling, curious, and all that. I just don’t want one in my home relying on me.
* "You’ll change your mind." Isn’t it possible that as an adult, I’ve learned how to make a decision and stick to it?
My husband and I talked about kids before marriage. We both agreed we didn’t want any and the forward in our future rested on that. He had a bad first marriage and I had little instinct or physical and mental desire to invest. Subsequently we have prepared responses for those who invade our personal lives with the question, "Do you have kids?" as if that is the only characteristic about us that makes us worthy to get to know. How about, "Do you travel?" "Have you been to ... ?" "What’s the last movie you saw?"
Why choose to be child-free? Well there are the selfish reasons (that’s what you tell me, I’m selfish) such as wanting a clean house, peace and quiet, financial and personal freedom, as well as an identity that isn’t bound to someone much younger than you. Then there is the "carbon footprint," impact on society, society’s impact on the child, and overpopulation. Those are real concerns, but for our primary ones.
We’re very free people and enjoyed fulfilling single lives before marrying. It’s been a journey to merge those lives alone that adding another wouldn’t give us the opportunity to learn about one another. Sure, after eighteen years the kids move away (but that’s not so sure anymore) and then you have time, but until they move out it’s all about the kids. I want it to be all about my husband; my happy, funny, loving, appreciative, and adorable husband. I want his life to be all about me, too.
If I re-read this I would agree that I’m selfish. I’d rather be selfish, know it and not have a child than to do otherwise. Don’t you? I’ve read your stories about resenting moms that have (or make) time to spend on themselves. "They should be taking care of their kids!" you say. "How dare they improve themselves? I can’t!" But shouldn’t you be happy that people, who know they don’t want to have kids, don’t have them? How many people have children, don’t appreciate it, end up on Nanny 911 because they don’t have a clue as to what they’re doing and ruin a child’s life? No parent really looks happy in the grocery store or mall. Few look happy when they’re in the park with their kids. Why would I follow in those footsteps?
I see having a child as a status symbol. It’s like that huge one day event we call a wedding (didn’t have one of those either) The months of preparation, cute little clothes and toys, the parties and such that results in a day of labor and boom ... reality -- marriage and/or child.
I could be mad at my uterus for placing me in a caste of women who aren’t worthy to be part of the in crowd dominated by mommies. I could be mad that I endure criticism for making a choice that is right for me (other than following the crowd.) Instead I embrace my uterus (and praise God for the IUD) as the logical partner to my brain that said to me, "I’m not going to define you. You define yourself. Forget I’m here."
Stay up to date with the latest Reproductive Justice headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mmqc on Mar 25, 2009 5:48 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Child Free By Choice
Posted by: megpie71
» It'll change after you have your own?
Posted by: BlueTigress
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mjabele on Mar 25, 2009 6:21 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sounds like this is something the author would LIKE to believe, without actually having any idea of whether it's really true.
I'm sure I often look temporarily frustrated running after my kids in the grocery store.
On the other hand, I know absolutely that having kids has made my life much happier than it previously was.
I have no problem accepting the author's decision to avoid having kids. It certainly sounds like the right decision for her particular personality/situation.
On the other hand, she should be careful to avoid presuming that those of us who've had kids generally regret our decision. Seeing an occasional frustrated parent in the mall is proof of nothing.
Perhaps her vision is a bit selective. Has she REALLY ever been to a park or playground? I was at one this afternoon, and can't recall seeing anything but smiling, happy parents playing with their kids.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yeah, that's like seeing somebody having a hard day at (paid) work...
Posted by: jparsons
» RE: Wishful thinking can run both ways...
Posted by: cmaciain
» On the contrary...
Posted by: mjabele
» RE: On the contrary...
Posted by: stormy
» RE: Wishful thinking can run both ways...
Posted by: Lilykins
» We must move in different circles...
Posted by: mjabele
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Romans1 on Mar 25, 2009 7:03 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» More wishful thinking!
Posted by: jparsons
» RE: More wishful thinking!
Posted by: Romans1
» RE: xcellent decision
Posted by: Jabby
» Congrats! There's an award for the mom:
Posted by: kegbot1
» Let's see how many of them actually stay "conservative"
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Let's see how many of them actually stay "conservative"
Posted by: Romans1
» You are the exception
Posted by: Beck
» RE: You are the exception
Posted by: Romans1
» RE: Let's see how many of them actually stay "conservative"
Posted by: maxpayne
» There are none so blind as those who will not see
Posted by: Fog
» Experience
Posted by: truthlover
» RE: Let's see how many of them actually stay "conservative"
Posted by: stormy
» RE: xcellent decision
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Excellent decision [They are the sons & the daughters of Life's longing for itself"
Posted by: Squarehead
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jparsons on Mar 26, 2009 12:30 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Yes, please! If you don't want children, do your darndest not to have them...
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Yes, please! If you don't want children, do your darndest not to have them...
Posted by: notmom
» RE: Yes, please! If you don't want children, do your darndest not to have them...
Posted by: Outsidetheboxlookingin
» Just gotta say this (after a hard week with the kids)
Posted by: jparsons
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jroth420 on Mar 26, 2009 1:51 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Hallelujah! [we are all, first and foremost (& I would say, always) the human animal.
Posted by: Squarehead
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drfun on Mar 26, 2009 2:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With Octo-mom being a prime example of how not to be a parent.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: After being a teacher
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: After being a teacher [~ 50% of the population (using the very defective IQ test regime)
Posted by: Squarehead
Comments are closed-
Posted by: friendofpyrex on Mar 26, 2009 2:55 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You may find this reassuring
Posted by: DHopper
» RE: You may find this reassuring
Posted by: friendofpyrex
» RE: Reassuring
Posted by: Jabby
» No cake but eating!
Posted by: Gaia7
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jeronimus on Mar 26, 2009 3:01 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So yes, please libs, do not breed. The future belongs to White Wingers!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Liberals should not have children
Posted by: DHopper
» RE: Liberals should not have children
Posted by: darbypenney
» RE: Liberals should not have children
Posted by: Jabby
» RE: Liberals should not have children
Posted by: Karina
» RE: Liberals should not have children
Posted by: Ky Lake Dave
» MSNBC and NPR?
Posted by: truthlover
» RE: Liberals should not have children
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» survival instinct?
Posted by: toddcory
» RE: Liberals should not have children
Posted by: eklawson
» RE: Liberals should not have children
Posted by: Vik
» RE: Liberals should not have children
Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Mar 26, 2009 3:31 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In our kid-centric society we tend to take this for granted. But as the article points out, having kids these days can be very much about personal status, as well as gaining the approval and acceptance of others.
I see it all of the time. It's a rite of passage where a woman becomes complete, and a full member of the girls' club, and men prove they are grown-up, responsible, and that their swimmers can swim.
Of course, I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for that to change. The pressure to be fertile and have descendants goes back to the ancient times. From an evolutionary perspective, it shouldn't surprise us that our biological urge towards survival of the species tends to manifest itself in our social pressures and norms.
An interesting exception seems to be the single mom who chooses to be a single mom. We consider welfare moms and octa-moms to be the lowest members of society, perhaps because they did not follow the proper rituals, and there is no male to "protect" them.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Children without fathers
Posted by: truthlover
» RE: Children
Posted by: wireup
Comments are closed-
Posted by: losingmyliberties on Mar 26, 2009 3:40 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: unfreinus
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: unfreinus
Posted by: KiwiBR
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ProfBob on Mar 26, 2009 3:56 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Although that carbon argument sounds good, I doubt it's as true as everyone believes
Posted by: Beck
» Then you only know childless couples who are rich and have itchy feet!
Posted by: truthlover
» RE: Breeder apologist alert!!!
Posted by: Quist
Comments are closed-
Posted by: overseas on Mar 26, 2009 3:57 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: If you had not been born then what?
Posted by: luzmejor
» RE: If you had not been born then what?
Posted by: luzmejor
» RE: If you had not been born then what?
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: If you had not been born then what?
Posted by: wireup
» RE: If you had not been born then what?
Posted by: AMerrickanGirl
» RE: If you had not been born then what? - Dead parent
Posted by: BlueTigress
» RE: If you had not been born then what?
Posted by: Lilykins
Comments are closed-
Posted by: exvagabond on Mar 26, 2009 4:17 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Fighting for air
Posted by: luzmejor
» RE: Fighting for air
Posted by: exvagabond
Comments are closed-
Posted by: deni_haven on Mar 26, 2009 4:40 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now my plans are only a distant memory as I "got saved" and then MY PLANS didn't matter ~ it was all about "What does GOD want for my life?" Through home schooling associations, we got involved in the Quiverfull/patriarchy movement and found out that what HE wants is "Arrows for the War."
"Like arrows in the hands of a mighty man, so are children in one's youth ~ blessed is the man who has his quiver full of them."
I ended up with seven children ~ despite physical and financial hardships ~ I believed that I had submitted my womb to God's service.
Ugh ~ I'm out of that now and NO LONGER QUIVERING.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» That's disgusting
Posted by: Fog
» That's incredibly self-righteous and nasty
Posted by: demidesigrrl
» RE: That's incredibly self-righteous and nasty
Posted by: morticia
» Terrific link, deni_haven
Posted by: fork
» RE: No Longer Quivering
Posted by: Dboy
» RE: No Longer Quivering
Posted by: Sunfell
» You submitted your womb to God's service?
Posted by: Ellie1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MyLeftFoot on Mar 26, 2009 4:53 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I usually answer, I love them... if they're cooked right.
that pretty much ends the conversation.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: What's the matter with you...
Posted by: notmom
» RE: What's the matter with you...
Posted by: Karina
» RE: What's the matter with you...
Posted by: Dboy
» RE: What's the matter with you...
Posted by: Sunfell
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Overburdened Planet on Mar 26, 2009 5:00 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Scroll down one full page to see online table. I've listed the reasons below
Reasons given: I can't help it, it's a biological urge.
Real reasons: Unexamined motivations.
Suggested alternatives: Institutions await those who can't control their biological urges.
Reasons given: Want to give our parents grandchildren.
Real reasons: Still seeking parental approval.
Suggested alternatives: Live your own life and encourage your parents to do the same.
Reasons given: I just love children.
Real reasons: Out of touch with inner child, and with existing children.
Suggested alternatives: Adopt, step, and foster parenting. Big Brother/Sister. Work with children, teach.
Reasons given: I have superior human genes.
Real reasons: Doesn't recognize an oxymoron. Megalomania.
Suggested alternatives: Do great things with your genes, rather than expecting the next cultured batch to do it.
Reasons given: Need help on farm or in family business.
Real reasons: Too cheap to hire help. Child labor laws inconvenient.
Suggested alternatives: Mechanization gives faster return on investment.
Reasons given: Want someone to care for me in my old age.
Real reasons: Fear of aging. Exploitative personality.
Suggested alternatives: Save money and prepare for retirement. Be nice to people so they will visit you in the home.
Reasons given: Pregnancy and childbirth are life experiences.
Real reasons: Life choices limited by social indoctrination.
Suggested alternatives: Rent pregnancy simulator. Choose different life experiences.
Reasons given: A good family is essential to career advancement and strong standing in the community.
Real reasons: Social insecurity. Wants trophy children to improve social status.
Suggested alternatives: Rent children from talent agency on special occasions. Have white picket fence installed.
Reasons given: We want to create a life which embodies our love for each other.
Real reasons: Ego, times two, minus imagination, equals three plus.
Suggested alternatives: Garden. Adopt a stream, trail, or hiway. Rescue animals. Protect & restore ecosystems to embody love.
Reasons given: I want my kids (who don't exist yet) to have all the things I didn't have.
Real reasons: Unfulfilled childhood desires and fantasies.
Suggested alternatives: Deal with regrets & make best of life. Provide for existing children.
Reasons given: To carry on family name.
Real reasons: Trying to please Dad. Duped by bloodline superstition.
Suggested alternatives: Create something enduring & give it family name. Donate blood to pass on bloodline.
Reasons given: Want to see a little me.
Real reasons: Self-absorption. Lack of ego gratification.
Suggested alternatives: Order custom-made, life-like doll. Create a gratifying life of your own.
Reasons given: God wants us to.
Real reasons: Mindless obedience to dogma peddlers who want larger flocks.
Suggested alternatives: Seek true nature of God, whatever you perceive God to be.
Reasons given: My wife/husband wants a baby.
Real reasons: Giving in out of fear of losing partner.
Suggested alternatives: Communicate true desires. Spouse may feel you're the one who wants to breed. Rent baby simulator doll.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: 36 Reasons to Adopt vs. Procreate, Part I
Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: 36 Reasons to Adopt vs. Procreate, Part I
Posted by: Opus
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Overburdened Planet on Mar 26, 2009 5:01 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Real reasons: Ego extension. Racial identity.
Suggested alternatives: Recognize value of people with different genetic makeups.
Reasons given: It's a spiritual thing for me.
Real reasons: Other reasons too easily refuted.
Suggested alternatives: Find truly spiritual experiences.
Reasons given: I've always wanted to have children, it's what people do.
Real reasons: Unquestioned cultural conditioning.
Suggested alternatives: Consider alternatives. Question expectations. Adopt.
Reasons given: To cement our relationship.
Real reasons: Fear of failed marriage.
Suggested alternatives: Communicate to strengthen relationship. Attend retreats for bonding couples.
Reasons given: I love babies.
Real reasons: Short-sighted view of reality.
Suggested alternatives: Babies soon turn into children, then adults. Infant care work is available.
Reasons given: Being a mother is a woman's highest calling.
Real reasons: Beguiled into believing compliance is noble free choice.
Suggested alternatives: Motherhood, and fatherhood, may be achieved without breeding. Many children wait for good homes.
Reasons given: My child could find a way to save the world.
Real reasons: "Mother of God" complex. (Also applies to men).
Suggested alternatives: If you want something done right, do it yourself.
Reasons given: We'd like to try for a boy/girl this time.
Real reasons: Ego extension. Gender identity insecurity. Dissatisfaction with existing offspring.
Suggested alternatives: Appreciate who you have, they might resent their sibling whose gender is preferred.
Reasons given: I just want to.
Real reasons: Just wants to.
Suggested alternatives: Choosing to breed precludes most other things you'll just want to do.
Reasons given: I want someone who will love me and not leave me.
Real reasons: Fear of rejection. Unresolved relationship issues.
Suggested alternatives: Give love to get love. Accept change and deal with loss.
Reasons given: Our economy needs young workers to replace retired workers.
Real reasons: Willing to sacrifice offspring to gods of National Economy.
Suggested alternatives: Automation reduces need for wage slaves. Consider rights of unconceived to stay that way.
Reasons given: The world needs more of us or we'll be outnumbered.
Real reasons: Elitism. Xenophobia. Eugenics easier to conceal than genocide.
Suggested alternatives: Convert others to your views so there'll be one more of your kind and one less of Them.
Reasons given: We may as well, the planet is doomed anyway.
Real reasons: Nihilistic natalism.
Suggested alternatives: Consider ethics of sentencing an innocent person to life, and death, in ecological collapse.
Reasons given: I'd like to achieve a sense of immortality.
Real reasons: Fear of death and non-existence.
Suggested alternatives: Accept mortality. Spread memes not genes. Socrates' heirs are not apparent, but his ideas linger strong.
Reasons given: My biological clock has gone off.
Real reasons: Women's normal heightened sexual desire in 30s & 40s difficult to accept in puritanical societies.
Suggested alternatives: Disarm that culturally-implanted mental time bomb. It's okay to make love and not babies.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Overburdened Planet on Mar 26, 2009 5:01 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Real reasons: Never thought about it. Unthinking conformity.
Suggested alternatives: Think before you breed, and you might not.
Reasons given: I might regret not having had the experience later, when it's too late.
Real reasons: Fear of future worries and life passing too fast.
Suggested alternatives: We can't experience everything. Far better to regret not breeding than to regret breeding
Reasons given: I do not want to deny my kids (who do not exist yet) the joy of existence.
Real reasons: Ignoring lack of joy in existing children.
Suggested alternatives: Promote existence of joy rather than imagining joy in mere existence.
Reasons given: Procreation has traditionally been a source of personal empowerment for women.
Real reasons: Feels powerless. Desires power and respect society appears to give to mothers and withholds from others.
Suggested alternatives: Mothers get more lip service than respect. Picking up family's slack is not empowering. Seek self-defined sources of power.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» One big reason to really consider ALL implications of adoption, especially the negative ones
Posted by: Beck
» Adoption issues
Posted by: truthlover
» RE: One big reason to really consider ALL implications of adoption, especially the negative ones
Posted by: exvagabond
» Prejudiced much?
Posted by: BlueTigress
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lady_L on Mar 26, 2009 5:14 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that if you want to have children, then have them if you can support and take care of them. Just don't put down the people who choose not to have children. They're not selfish; they're thoughtful, and I have seen parents who I wish had been more thoughtful about the decision to have children.
We have two children. I love them, even when I don't like what they're doing. I can't imagine life without these two bright, frustrating, sweet, strong teens, but that's me. I'm not into making choices for other people.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: You know, it's not that big a deal. You're right. Respect needs to run both ways.
Posted by: Beck
» RE: You know, it's not that big a deal. You're right. Respect needs to run both ways.
Posted by: writer7
» Terminology
Posted by: Karina
» RE: You know, it's not that big a deal
Posted by: TheNamelessCity
» Apology and a comment
Posted by: Lady_L
» "Change your catheter in a nursing home!!!"
Posted by: morticia
» Apology
Posted by: Lady_L
» RE: Apology
Posted by: stormy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ky Lake Dave on Mar 26, 2009 5:15 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My four sons have brought me more joy than any other experience in this lifetime. I am proud of these kids. I was not too sure about being a father. I did not think I was mature enough or financially stable enough to have a child. I was surprised with my first son and the twins that followed. (The 99.7% effective rating on the pill is ringing hollow at my house.) I grew into the part of father and it is amazing how motivating keeping a child fed can be for your career.
My oldest is a Senior and the twins and my adopted son are in 8th grade. Without children I would have missed out on first steps, first day of school, first words (dada x 3), first base hit, first touchdown, first dance, first play, first girlfriend and too many incredible experiences that you have to be a parent to understand. You cannot comprehend fear till your teach a 16 yr old how to drive. I owe these boys so much and can never repay them for the wonderful memories and love we have shared. I have not reached the grand parents stage of life yet but instead of worrying about getting old I am looking forward to watching my sons raise my grandchildren.
There were a couple of quotes I had responses for;
“Subsequently we have prepared responses for those who invade our personal lives with the question, "Do you have kids?" as if that is the only characteristic about us that makes us worthy to get to know. How about, "Do you travel?" "Have you been to ... ?" "What’s the last movie you saw?"“
What is the harm in asking if you have kids. People are looking for common bonds to share and have discussions. The author is way too sensitive here.
“I see having a child as a status symbol. It’s like that huge one day event we call a wedding (didn’t have one of those either) The months of preparation, cute little clothes and toys, the parties and such that results in a day of labor and boom ... reality -- marriage and/or child.”
You think status symbol when your mid diaper change, elbow deep in fecal matter looking for a wet wipe when your son pees on your chest. Oh boy!
You think status symbol when you hear of a school bus wreck with injuries on the radio and your sons are not answering their cell phones. My sons were ok, they were not on that bus but per school rules cell phones were turned off.
It is not just one huge day event or one day of labor but a lifetime commitment of joy and pain and caring for a person. You are taking on the greatest of all responsibilities, raising a baby into a person.
I applaud the author for looking into her heart and realizing that she is not the parent type. I wish more would think before they breed. If you look at a child and can not see anything more than a carbon footprint you should just say no to procreation. Your doing the world a favor.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You're right about the question about having kids. Who takes offense at mere small talk?
Posted by: Beck
» RE: I agree! Some are not ment to be parents.
Posted by: cryptique
» I can care less
Posted by: Ky Lake Dave
» RE: I can care less
Posted by: AMerrickanGirl
» RE: I agree! Some are not ment to be parents.
Posted by: Lilykins
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Mar 26, 2009 5:30 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yusandnick on Mar 26, 2009 6:02 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course, it misses the biggest argument in favor of kids--if you haven't had them, how do you know what you're missing? (Only a childless person could think the relevant trade-off is the one between kids and the Cineplex or the Bahamas.)
And (not surprisingly) it also misses the biggest argument against--namely, that the desire for kids is just a powerful genetic trick, and the children we produce will all face decay, disillusionment, and death. My kids are my greatest joy--but is this just because I've been fooled by my genes, and have I really done them a favor by bringing them here? I think about this all the time. On the other hand, I don't ever think of the "good times" I'm missing.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: i don't get it
Posted by: notmom
» RE: i don't get it
Posted by: cookiecody
Comments are closed-
Posted by: olympia43 on Mar 26, 2009 6:24 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» License to breed
Posted by: BlueTigress
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bizatch! on Mar 26, 2009 6:37 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I must say that it is a very North American attitude to be so righteous about this. When I talk to colleagues in Europe, they mention how important it is to maintain their personal life even if they have kids. That means taking time out (i.e. going for dinner; playing music in a band without incurring the wrath of one's spouse) and not centering every activity around the children. Not to do this is to become stupid and limited in social development. I have many friends who are barely literate after spending three or four years in close contact with their children!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sanford on Mar 26, 2009 6:45 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Selfish is...
Posted by: yusandnick
» RE: Selfish is...
Posted by: Sanford
» RE: Selfish is...
Posted by: buzzsaw
» No one ever got asked this, you know
Posted by: Beck
» RE: No one ever got asked this, you know
Posted by: Sanford
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Deadline on Mar 26, 2009 7:25 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: snax on Mar 26, 2009 7:39 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: One Word:
Posted by: MobileSucks
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MobileSucks on Mar 26, 2009 8:11 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» there (I was distracted. Sue me nerds)
Posted by: MobileSucks
» Oh, shut up.
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing
» Do you believe this?
Posted by: truthlover
» RE: -(
Posted by: Lilykins
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LeeAnnG on Mar 26, 2009 8:16 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All of these people have an equal right to their decisions, and I have yet to hear any of them go on and on about why their choices are justified. I've lived in cities, towns, and rural areas, and I'm almost 62 years old, but I have never, ever encountered the attitude that not having children is selfish, except for religious articles that promote prolific propagation as mandated by God. Even my religious friends have never expressed any condemnation for those who don't want children.
I have two grown children, and I am glad I do. I never was eager for them to grow up and leave home, and I was most definitely not "unhappy" in stores or restaurants when they were small. But I, along with my friends, family, and acquaintances, have the greatest respect for anyone who does not want children. How can this possibly be selfish? Having more children than one can afford, having children because they are a status symbol, or having children in order to increase the size of a religious sect - those are selfish acts.
The author may have been unfortunate in her association with people who disapprove of her choice, but the tone of the article is one of excessive protest. Why does this woman feel the need to publicly defend herself?
There are many organizations and individuals who believe the world's population is growing too fast. Increasing numbers of couples have elected not to have children. Childlessness, purposeful or otherwise, is not an anomaly that leaves one isolated and shunned.
Some people seem to have a drive to reproduce, while others don't. It's that simple, and there is no need to set up straw figures (these people who make the author feel selfish or insecure or whatever her problem is) in order to justify what is a very, very personal decision.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Protesting too much
Posted by: Martin32
» RE: Protesting too much
Posted by: spiralwriter
» Being subjected to ignorance - and apologies from me
Posted by: LeeAnnG
» RE: Being subjected to ignorance - and apologies from me
Posted by: stormy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CookieMonster on Mar 26, 2009 8:40 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing on Mar 26, 2009 8:50 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: GuitarBill on Mar 26, 2009 8:59 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would dispute that assertion.
Obviously, you lack one "biological requirement" to have child.
And I think that "biological requirement" is obvious.
:P
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Hey, shit-for-brains...
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing
» Good morning, Mr. Van Onan.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Good morning, Mr. Van Onan [you might be a little 'Heavy Duty' in your robust response
Posted by: Squarehead
» RE: Good morning, Mr. Van Onan [you might be a little 'Heavy Duty' in your robust response
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Obviously, the genius who gave me a 1 believes the author is a
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Reading is fundamental
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing
» Does she own her husband? Is he a part of her body?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Does she own her husband? Is he a part of her body?
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing
» At least I'm a product of natural birth.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: At least I'm a product of natural birth.
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing
» Any time, Honky--you fascist scumbag.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» CHILDREN!!!!!
Posted by: buzzsaw
» I'm me
Posted by: Honky the Nihilist...
» Bullsh*t
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Hey Eddie, want to talk about my father like that to my face?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Any time you like, Internet Tough Guy Bill.
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing
» Feeling lucky?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Sure you do.
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing
» Coward.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Please Be Nice...
Posted by: Rapunzel
» Excuse me, he started it.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Fuck you, liar.
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing
» By your own admission
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Fuck you, liar.
Posted by: Rapunzel
» Yes, he did start it.
Posted by: Rapunzel
» RE: Yes, he did start it.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» I might deserve it
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing
» Yeah, you're big and tough hiding behind your monitor talking smack about my father.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Your deserving it
Posted by: Rapunzel
» RE: Your deserving it
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing
» If I've learned nothing else from you, Honky, it's this:
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Your deserving it
Posted by: Rapunzel
» Obviously, it's not obvious
Posted by: truthlover
» Maybe I didn't write that comment very well :-)
Posted by: GuitarBill
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Mar 26, 2009 9:08 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Actually, having children can make the parent(s) feel younger and even happier.
Posted by: cmaciain
Comments are closed-
Posted by: notmom on Mar 26, 2009 9:11 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sanford on Mar 26, 2009 9:12 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Try this...
Posted by: pelican beak
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yurbud on Mar 26, 2009 9:17 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead, the people who have one kid tend to have more even if the first one is special needs or a pain in the ass.
If the author doesn't want to have kids that's fine, and it's one reason I think abortion should be legal--people who don't want kids may not turn out to be very good parents--but it's odd that someone feels the need to evangelize others about her choice that is unlikely to win many converts.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: If having kids is so bad, why does anyone have more than one?
Posted by: spiralwriter
» Memories aren't always exactly what they're cracked up to be
Posted by: aquariansun
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Mar 26, 2009 9:26 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
unfortunately, it means there won't be anyone around to check my feeding tubes in my last years... if I get that far.
So I ask myself, why exactly do I have to suffer extra years simply because some dipshit lawyer, doctor or medical institution is freaked out about LEGAL REPERCUSSIONS if I want to end my years early? Because I have no advocate for my conditions of care & suffering?
...maybe I don't want to drool on myself for 5 years when I'm 95?
...maybe I don't think I should have to struggle to live for months or years?
...maybe I don't believe my dogs & cats should have more mercy shown on their medical miseries than I'll ever get?
...maybe I don't believe that industrially warehousing the Aged or Infirm is a humane solution?
Being childless bears a serious follow-up question:
who will decide how you die... or how you live until you do?
perspective, people.
Perspective.
The Jeff Farias Show: streams FREE & LIVE Mon-Fri, 6-9pmEST
FREE podcast
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Having kids is no guarantee
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing
» RE: Having kids is no guarantee
Posted by: pelican beak
» no *duh*; but, *not* having kids is *pretty much a guarantee*
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN
» RE: a decision I made in the 80s
Posted by: Gaia7
» RE: a decision I made in the 80s
Posted by: Lilykins
» you haven't thought this through...
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN
» RE: you haven't thought this through...
Posted by: Lilykins
» Behind Closed Doors: What You Don't Know about Mom's Nursing Home or Assisted Living Home can Hurt
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gravitas on Mar 26, 2009 9:27 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Best Decision I Ever Made
Posted by: tyler762
» RE: Best Decision I Ever Made
Posted by: Lilykins
Comments are closed-
Posted by: freshlemon on Mar 26, 2009 9:38 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that a family of five has five people using the resources that taxes provide. Why should they get such a huge benefit for less cost than a single or a married couple with no children.
If one wants children then they must be ready to provide for them. They should not expect the rest of society to pay for their personal desires or weaknesses. Do away with the deductible for each child or tax the number of people in a family. Or charge a surtax for each child attending public schools.
Having children or not having children is a choice. Don't make singles, senior citizens, or childless couples pay for someone elses choice to have children.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Having children serves as a social and financial entitlement to many.
Posted by: njguy73
» RE: Having children serves as a social and financial entitlement to many.
Posted by: cmaciain
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Peaceoutdawg on Mar 26, 2009 9:55 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Carole Beaton on Mar 26, 2009 9:57 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ladyratsb on Mar 26, 2009 10:17 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: My Genes Aren't Going Anywhere
Posted by: marykane
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Archie1954 on Mar 26, 2009 10:26 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: akang on Mar 26, 2009 10:29 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Coming home after a busy work day, many have been the times I collapse into chair, beer in hand, and thank the Gods I do not have a kid.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I'd rather be dead than have a kid.
Posted by: Sunfell
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Kelly on Mar 26, 2009 10:52 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» AMEN
Posted by: Karina
» RE: Just don't use the carbon footprint argument
Posted by: cmaciain
» RE: Just don't use the carbon footprint argument
Posted by: Kelly
» Good point but...
Posted by: hanakwa
» RE: Your forgetting the offsprings' footprints. (This is a logically flawed argument.)
Posted by: Quist
» *Possible* exponential growth
Posted by: Kelly
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DrJan on Mar 26, 2009 10:54 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My husband and I were certain we didn't want kids, until we reached our 40s. I had my medical career, we loved being a childless couple. But then we started to contemplate what our later years would be like, once our own parents were gone, with only one sibling between us, other relatives far away... So we adopted two precious girls, and they are the lights of our lives.
Maybe this author will change her mind, or maybe not. It's no one's business but hers.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pacto on Mar 26, 2009 11:23 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gaia7 on Mar 26, 2009 11:27 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am in my 5th decade and have borne no child. The hard part for me has not been defending my decision, but the actual ABILITY to be able to carry out said choice.
Let me explain. In the very early 80's when my husband and I decided to marry and on the condition that I would not have children, I consulted with my doctor. Maybe things have changed but back then I had to literally do BATTLE in order to ensure that medically I had zero risk of pregnancy.
I asked my doctor to tie my tubes. He said that I was "Too young to know how I really felt about having children". Mind you he was talking to a grown married woman! He added that surely my husband would never approve of such a decision. After talking to my husband himself, MY doctor suggested a vasectomy for my husband. Maybe he thought no man would ever really do such a thing and gave us the name of a doctor for my husband.
We went to this "vasectomy doctor". He told us both that again, I was simply too young to know my own mind and that my husband would be wise to keep his options open. He pointed out to them that he already had a son and that was all that he wanted. He basically had to push the issue.
As I said, I sure hope it is easier for a woman to choose a medically fail safe option for not being forced into reproduction or pregnancy.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I applaud your decision!
Posted by: spiralwriter
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ndr2d2 on Mar 26, 2009 11:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A little hint of doubt?
Posted by: Gaia7
» RE: A little hint of doubt?
Posted by: ndr2d2
Comments are closed-
Posted by: noalternative on Mar 26, 2009 12:25 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our environmental footprint is a result of overconsumption, not too many kids.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: You have a right to not have kids
Posted by: DaBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wireup on Mar 26, 2009 1:16 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What do you MEAN you're never going to have children? You're a female. That's what females DO!!!
I made the decision to NEVER bring a child into this utterly rotten world. What for? There are too many people in it as it is.
What I've always found interesting is how many people have told me that I'm selfish. What the hell is selfish about not wanting to contribute to overpopulation? That makes no sense to me!
What I find utterly selfish is those who accuse ME of being selfish and then go on to duplicate themselves, as though doing that is the most WONDERFUL thing in the world. What is so WONDERFUL about duplicating yourself? All you're doing is contributing what we don't need: MORE PEOPLE.
And the utter nonsense that infertile people go through in order to duplicate themselves, when there are many many unwanted children dying for a home, parents, and a family. If you're in such desperate straights to duplicate yourselves, you might just try giving a home to an unwanted child. If you REALLY want a kid, then adopt.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Never had'em, never regretted
Posted by: yesman
» RE: Never had'em, never regretted
Posted by: cmaciain
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ms_happy on Mar 26, 2009 1:43 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everyday I express my gratitude for not having children. I have time for romance with my husband, we can go out and do whatever we want whenever we want to. No worries about Little Johnny getting grabbed up by a pedophile or dying before us. (This just happened to our neighbors; it is devastating and they will have to live with that forever.)
Really if it's so great to be a parent, then why must all the parents in this blog sell it so hard? I think that once you have a kid, you have to tell people you love being a parent whether you do or not. If you admitted that it wasn't all it was cracked up to be, then you risk looking stupid.
As for being able to cry with joy after seeing your child kick a goal or do well in a play, that's fine, but I cry with joy at watching a hummingbird mother sit on her nest, or having my husband spend ten minutes gazing into my eyes. I'm fulfilled in the cry-with-joy department. (What parent has ten minutes to gaze into their partner's eyes?)
Yep, it was a pain in the you-know-where when we were in our 20's and 30's and everybody would ask "When are you two going to start a family?" (As if the two of us weren't already a family). Now in our 50's what a delight to never have to hear that again, and just enjoy all the pleasures of our child-free life. If you don't know what it's like to not have a child, then how can you say it's better to have 'em?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Some logical fallacies here
Posted by: Kelly
» RE: How are these "opinions" actually logical fallacies?
Posted by: Quist
» RE: How are these "opinions" actually logical fallacies?
Posted by: Kelly
» RE: Child-free and Loving It
Posted by: yesman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Mar 26, 2009 2:14 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Besides if any child-free-by-choice people really have that reproductive urge, they can borrow my two offspring for a day or weekend any time! I guarantee it'll nip that urge in the bud and provide me and my mate with 24 hours of temporary happiness.
We love our boogers tons but dangit, it really does take a village and so far that village ain't steppin' up.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hilaryuk on Mar 26, 2009 2:59 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree that women should be free to choose whether they want to breed or not - after all it's a life-long commitment. What sometimes irritates me is the inability of a few women on both sides of the equation to appreciate the legitimacy of choices different from their own.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: oldhippie on Mar 26, 2009 3:03 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: If I Had Only Known
Posted by: yesman
» RE: If I Had Only Known
Posted by: eres
» RE: If I Had Only Known
Posted by: Kelly
» RE: If I Had Only Known
Posted by: clamhod
» RE: Really Kelly???
Posted by: Quist
» RE: eally Kelly???
Posted by: Kelly
» RE: If I Had Only Known
Posted by: Karina
» RE: If I Had Only Known
Posted by: yusandnick
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yesman on Mar 26, 2009 3:47 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However, I would disagree with one of your comments. You're not being "selfish." To be selfish requires that you unjustifiably put your own interests ahead of those of someone else. Simply deciding not to have children harms no one else's legitimate interests. In fact, as you have noted, by deciding not to contribute to overpopulation, you have done the rest of us a favor. So, your decision could legitimately be construed as altruistic, not selfish.
Having children because you think you're "supposed to" and then failing to raise them in a loving and supportive home is selfish. Such selfishness is all too common. Other potential parents would do well to emulate your decision-making process (if not necessarily your decision).
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: eres on Mar 26, 2009 5:33 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» One word:
Posted by: wireup
» RE: likely opting out
Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hanakwa on Mar 26, 2009 6:07 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Marie123 on Mar 26, 2009 7:30 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To suggest that your offspring are conservatives for life is premature, unless you've brainwashed them. Or you're planning to control every experience they ever have.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: archivist on Mar 26, 2009 9:10 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everything that spews forth from thier mouth is pure theory.
By the way if no one had children your dumb ass would never have been born.
Read some books, thousands, have some kids then get back to me.
Peace
P.S. Children are are NEVER planned. If you plan for them they NEVER come. Man plans and god laughs. When your done being a child you'll know what I'm talking about.
REALLY good sex and the throws of passion bring children. If it doesn't happen by "accident" your probably still a chikld yourself.
Oh, yeah. If your a real, loving person raising shildren is a tremendous responsibility. Yes children will drag you out of your self obsessed spoiled ego centric way of life. Call it a rebirth cause it can be painful. But its all for the better.
Let the population work itself out.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Ignorant
Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: Ignorant
Posted by: AMerrickanGirl
» Who is this ignorant asshole?
Posted by: clamhod
» RE: Let the population work itself out.
Posted by: wireup
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maddy on Mar 26, 2009 11:30 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, let me say that if you don't want to have kids, fine, don't. Doesn't matter to me one way or the other, and I do think that there are legitimate questions to be raised about population growth and the myriad impending ecological catastrophes that are coming our way... BUT...
Something about the reasoning and defensiveness of this piece sits weird with me, and I think it's because its lens is too narrow. Yes, our contemporary culture is a bit pathological in its fixation on raising children--point taken. But isn't the "my lover and I will live happily ever after" just as much of a pathological fixation of our contemporary culture? Why is one a fool's errand and the other a noble venture?
Second, doesn't this focus on not having a child because there will be moments of unpleasantness or debating whether or not it's selfish MISS some sort of "circle of life" understanding--that we are all part of this process and that it is perfectly reasonable to participate in birth, life, aging, and death--and that, in the end, the suffering and loss along the way have as much meaning as the joy and love? Is it selfish to be born? Is it selfish to die? Since when does "selfishness" have anything to do with these biological processes that exist before and beyond us? To proudly opt out of it as some kind of statement of enlightenment and virtue strikes me as another cultural pathology--a culture increasingly too far removed from the realities of nature, so much so, that it's almost, I dunno, embarrassing in its narrowness and the arrogance that legitimates that narrowness. I realize that I'm about to trip headfirst into a biologically determinist argument with these points, which bothers me intellectually, so i guess it's time for me to quit while I'm confused...
and go to sleep. Because I'm selfish--a better person wouldn't need to sleep.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: annalondon on Mar 27, 2009 5:57 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I love it when people 1. tell us what to do 2. Explain why they know better.
I cannot help but laugh when reading some comments, some people tell you that it would make you so much happier to have kids, when you write in the article that there is nothing more annoying!
The main principle for me is "you have the freedom to do what you want from your life as long as your actions do not impair your neighbour's life and freedom".
I find it quite interesting that some people take your choice as a personal attack on them and their ideas...
Also wanted to say, quite liked the beginning of your article, many women believe that to bear a child will make them a full woman!
I do not have kids yet, am hoping to have some, but I am a complete human being, with or without child!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MargaretRose on Mar 27, 2009 1:54 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Who cares?
Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
Comments are closed-
Posted by: janinastajic on Mar 27, 2009 5:50 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» thanks & anecdotes of this childless couple in mexico
Posted by: aquariansun
Comments are closed-
Posted by: clamhod on Mar 28, 2009 4:28 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Time for a trip to the vet, for you! Snippety snip!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» AAGHH!! I hate it when my posts go to the wrong place!!!
Posted by: clamhod
Comments are closed-
Posted by: clamhod on Mar 28, 2009 4:39 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It always gets a rise out of ppl when you make your stand, doesn't it? LOL!!
I've known that I've wanted to be childfree since I was 9 years old. With each passing year, that feeling has grown stronger.
I also feel that you don't have to HAVE kids to help and/or enjoy kids. I'm the crazy-aunt figure to several of my friends' children, which is satisfying enough for me.
There are so, so, sooooooooooo many parents who, if they were brutally honest with themselves and everyone else around them, would undo their parental decision in a New York minute. The louder they protest the sentiments of the childfree, the more transparent they become.
I wish more ppl would THINK....THINK....before they breed. No child should be hated or unwanted by their own parents.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Another AlterNetter who's Happily Childfree!!
Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cherylsass123 on Mar 28, 2009 11:40 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But three years almost into estrogen therapy and hell, have I felt that maternal instinct at times lately. this when I read in LGBT publications like Gay Parent about lesbian women deciding to have children. following a link in their story to their family's blog, I saw all those photos of their son; whom unfortunately has down's syndrome but is absolutely the most darling child, so cute ! do I need to say I was in tears and doing some soul searching in myself when I saw their 3 year old son laying watching football with his mama; his birth mother right next to them. I then asked myself, " would I be open to this if I met a partner whom had her kids already?"
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: littlepitcher on Mar 29, 2009 10:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have worked for numerous childish, tantrum-throwing adults.
I have endured legions of demoniacal, tantrum-throwing, irresponsible, infantile, customers, clients, and family members.
Anyone who wants children can adopt an adult anywhere, anytime, who can be counted upon to behave just like a child the majority of the time. Some even have child-like charm on occasion.
Our nation is run by puerile politicians and (if lifestyle is any indication) CEO's, playing comic-book games with the 1/3 or so of our income they confiscate.
White trash and black trash men alike insist that women prove their genetic authenticity by providing sex on demand, then claim that we're insufficiently womanly. White and black trash women then get pregnant to prove the XX component, instead of proving that they have genetic guts enough to throw the bums out and prove that they're worth the trouble of breeding.
With all of this immaturity running rampant, anyone wanting a child should be able to acquire one without incurring additional social, ecological, or (much) personal expense.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mikeNwis on Mar 30, 2009 6:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: mike-N-wis
Posted by: omygodnotagain
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JourneyHome on Mar 30, 2009 2:15 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What if you are an alcoholic - should you pass those genes onto your children....?
What if you are smart and athletic and well adjusted....?
Kids are overrated. Like the free market system - they aren't the panacea to cure what ails you or us as a nation or world. They are like peas in a pod - all different shapes and sizes. Each one has their own personality traits. They aren't supermen and women and isn't that too much to expect? In the end they will be human beings some good, some bad, mostly in between.
If you think they are going to take care of you in your old age - you are being foolish - they might not have any extra money - they may not like you - they may be horrible people.
There are no guarantees.
My neighbor - great guy - wonderful wife - when he had his first kid - he was the leading advocate for having babies, walked on air.... by the time his second one rolled around - he understood why people didn't have them all too clearly.
For those who think 18 years and that's it - they are going to be in for a huge surprise or just be horrible parents - cutting your kids off or kicking them out at 18 is disastrous.
Children are a life long commitment. They'll be calling you with their problems until you are buried in the ground or scattered on the wind.
Children are probably best brought into the world when you are in your twenties - you don't sleep and the energy requirement is huge...and you still need a good support system of family, friends and neighbors...
Get a good 401k and read, read, read to the little buggers. If you are going to have children you have a duty of citizenship to teach them well.
Good people can still do great things to make this a better world, spread joy, laughter, and help one another - that is what we are here for....regardless of their kid count.
Having children doesn't make you great or good or even helpful. It's not an automatic and those who think it is - make horrible parents and are a drain on society and the planet. And for you religious types - it doesn't make you holy either.
Your actions and your intentions together are what count.
Peace to all,
Paul
Author-Journey Home
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SaveAmerica on Mar 30, 2009 2:42 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: It's true....
Posted by: TheNamelessCity
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cdmsr on Mar 30, 2009 10:27 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Quist on Mar 31, 2009 12:24 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ugotstahwonder on Mar 31, 2009 8:31 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lilly on Apr 1, 2009 7:07 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Another Perspective
Posted by: TheNamelessCity
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Andrew_S on Apr 2, 2009 12:03 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The rules of childrearing are not to say the least frightening. At it's worst easily classed by the state as criminal against a parent for the slightest indiscretion. I heard many thoughtful couples state that bringing your own child in the world is a risky business. Not simply in terms of the ease in which interpersonal relationships can breakdown due to the pressures of solitary nuclear parenting. By that I mean that community, extended family support and respite to a degree that is truly supportive is remiss. You are truly on your own and as one lawyer friend stated, every child brought in to the world today has a price tag attached to it. This was reinforced in reference to perhaps the way US society views children by three polish and two hungarian families with infants. Who chose to migrate back to their homeland with words to the effect that their children would be better off in the old country than here.
Perhaps it is all part of big Bubbas plan for planned reverse social engineering. Whatever it is this article was honest but could have been more detailed on other factors that affected the choices.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sureshot45 on Apr 5, 2009 10:57 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but i think it is interesting when people say having children is selfish in terms of overpopulation.
why do you think you have any more of a right to be here than someone elses child? because you were here first? you are someones child. you are a burden.
is it selfish to stay alive? as we are all burdens on this earth.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Violetflame11 on Apr 7, 2009 11:33 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mmqc on Mar 25, 2009 5:48 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Child Free By Choice
Posted by: megpie71
» It'll change after you have your own?
Posted by: BlueTigress
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mjabele on Mar 25, 2009 6:21 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sounds like this is something the author would LIKE to believe, without actually having any idea of whether it's really true.
I'm sure I often look temporarily frustrated running after my kids in the grocery store.
On the other hand, I know absolutely that having kids has made my life much happier than it previously was.
I have no problem accepting the author's decision to avoid having kids. It certainly sounds like the right decision for her particular personality/situation.
On the other hand, she should be careful to avoid presuming that those of us who've had kids generally regret our decision. Seeing an occasional frustrated parent in the mall is proof of nothing.
Perhaps her vision is a bit selective. Has she REALLY ever been to a park or playground? I was at one this afternoon, and can't recall seeing anything but smiling, happy parents playing with their kids.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yeah, that's like seeing somebody having a hard day at (paid) work...
Posted by: jparsons
» RE: Wishful thinking can run both ways...
Posted by: cmaciain
» On the contrary...
Posted by: mjabele
» RE: On the contrary...
Posted by: stormy
» RE: Wishful thinking can run both ways...
Posted by: Lilykins
» We must move in different circles...
Posted by: mjabele
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Romans1 on Mar 25, 2009 7:03 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» More wishful thinking!
Posted by: jparsons
» RE: More wishful thinking!
Posted by: Romans1
» RE: xcellent decision
Posted by: Jabby
» Congrats! There's an award for the mom:
Posted by: kegbot1
» Let's see how many of them actually stay "conservative"
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Let's see how many of them actually stay "conservative"
Posted by: Romans1
» You are the exception
Posted by: Beck
» RE: You are the exception
Posted by: Romans1
» RE: Let's see how many of them actually stay "conservative"
Posted by: maxpayne
» There are none so blind as those who will not see
Posted by: Fog
» Experience
Posted by: truthlover
» RE: Let's see how many of them actually stay "conservative"
Posted by: stormy
» RE: xcellent decision
Posted by: morticia
» RE: Excellent decision [They are the sons & the daughters of Life's longing for itself"
Posted by: Squarehead
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jparsons on Mar 26, 2009 12:30 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Yes, please! If you don't want children, do your darndest not to have them...
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Yes, please! If you don't want children, do your darndest not to have them...
Posted by: notmom
» RE: Yes, please! If you don't want children, do your darndest not to have them...
Posted by: Outsidetheboxlookingin
» Just gotta say this (after a hard week with the kids)
Posted by: jparsons
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jroth420 on Mar 26, 2009 1:51 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Hallelujah! [we are all, first and foremost (& I would say, always) the human animal.
Posted by: Squarehead
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drfun on Mar 26, 2009 2:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With Octo-mom being a prime example of how not to be a parent.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: After being a teacher
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: After being a teacher [~ 50% of the population (using the very defective IQ test regime)
Posted by: Squarehead
Comments are closed-
Posted by: friendofpyrex on Mar 26, 2009 2:55 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You may find this reassuring
Posted by: DHopper
» RE: You may find this reassuring
Posted by: friendofpyrex
» RE: Reassuring
Posted by: Jabby
» No cake but eating!
Posted by: Gaia7
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jeronimus on Mar 26, 2009 3:01 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So yes, please libs, do not breed. The future belongs to White Wingers!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Liberals should not have children
Posted by: DHopper
» RE: Liberals should not have children
Posted by: darbypenney
» RE: Liberals should not have children
Posted by: Jabby
» RE: Liberals should not have children
Posted by: Karina
» RE: Liberals should not have children
Posted by: Ky Lake Dave
» MSNBC and NPR?
Posted by: truthlover
» RE: Liberals should not have children
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» survival instinct?
Posted by: toddcory
» RE: Liberals should not have children
Posted by: eklawson
» RE: Liberals should not have children
Posted by: Vik
» RE: Liberals should not have children
Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Mar 26, 2009 3:31 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In our kid-centric society we tend to take this for granted. But as the article points out, having kids these days can be very much about personal status, as well as gaining the approval and acceptance of others.
I see it all of the time. It's a rite of passage where a woman becomes complete, and a full member of the girls' club, and men prove they are grown-up, responsible, and that their swimmers can swim.
Of course, I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for that to change. The pressure to be fertile and have descendants goes back to the ancient times. From an evolutionary perspective, it shouldn't surprise us that our biological urge towards survival of the species tends to manifest itself in our social pressures and norms.
An interesting exception seems to be the single mom who chooses to be a single mom. We consider welfare moms and octa-moms to be the lowest members of society, perhaps because they did not follow the proper rituals, and there is no male to "protect" them.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Children without fathers
Posted by: truthlover
» RE: Children
Posted by: wireup
Comments are closed-
Posted by: losingmyliberties on Mar 26, 2009 3:40 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: unfreinus
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: unfreinus
Posted by: KiwiBR
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ProfBob on Mar 26, 2009 3:56 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Although that carbon argument sounds good, I doubt it's as true as everyone believes
Posted by: Beck
» Then you only know childless couples who are rich and have itchy feet!
Posted by: truthlover
» RE: Breeder apologist alert!!!
Posted by: Quist
Comments are closed-
Posted by: overseas on Mar 26, 2009 3:57 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: If you had not been born then what?
Posted by: luzmejor
» RE: If you had not been born then what?
Posted by: luzmejor
» RE: If you had not been born then what?
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: If you had not been born then what?
Posted by: wireup
» RE: If you had not been born then what?
Posted by: AMerrickanGirl
» RE: If you had not been born then what? - Dead parent
Posted by: BlueTigress
» RE: If you had not been born then what?
Posted by: Lilykins
Comments are closed-
Posted by: exvagabond on Mar 26, 2009 4:17 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Fighting for air
Posted by: luzmejor
» RE: Fighting for air
Posted by: exvagabond
Comments are closed-
Posted by: deni_haven on Mar 26, 2009 4:40 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now my plans are only a distant memory as I "got saved" and then MY PLANS didn't matter ~ it was all about "What does GOD want for my life?" Through home schooling associations, we got involved in the Quiverfull/patriarchy movement and found out that what HE wants is "Arrows for the War."
"Like arrows in the hands of a mighty man, so are children in one's youth ~ blessed is the man who has his quiver full of them."
I ended up with seven children ~ despite physical and financial hardships ~ I believed that I had submitted my womb to God's service.
Ugh ~ I'm out of that now and NO LONGER QUIVERING.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» That's disgusting
Posted by: Fog
» That's incredibly self-righteous and nasty
Posted by: demidesigrrl
» RE: That's incredibly self-righteous and nasty
Posted by: morticia
» Terrific link, deni_haven
Posted by: fork
» RE: No Longer Quivering
Posted by: Dboy
» RE: No Longer Quivering
Posted by: Sunfell
» You submitted your womb to God's service?
Posted by: Ellie1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MyLeftFoot on Mar 26, 2009 4:53 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I usually answer, I love them... if they're cooked right.
that pretty much ends the conversation.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: What's the matter with you...
Posted by: notmom
» RE: What's the matter with you...
Posted by: Karina
» RE: What's the matter with you...
Posted by: Dboy
» RE: What's the matter with you...
Posted by: Sunfell
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Overburdened Planet on Mar 26, 2009 5:00 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Scroll down one full page to see online table. I've listed the reasons below
Reasons given: I can't help it, it's a biological urge.
Real reasons: Unexamined motivations.
Suggested alternatives: Institutions await those who can't control their biological urges.
Reasons given: Want to give our parents grandchildren.
Real reasons: Still seeking parental approval.
Suggested alternatives: Live your own life and encourage your parents to do the same.
Reasons given: I just love children.
Real reasons: Out of touch with inner child, and with existing children.
Suggested alternatives: Adopt, step, and foster parenting. Big Brother/Sister. Work with children, teach.
Reasons given: I have superior human genes.
Real reasons: Doesn't recognize an oxymoron. Megalomania.
Suggested alternatives: Do great things with your genes, rather than expecting the next cultured batch to do it.
Reasons given: Need help on farm or in family business.
Real reasons: Too cheap to hire help. Child labor laws inconvenient.
Suggested alternatives: Mechanization gives faster return on investment.
Reasons given: Want someone to care for me in my old age.
Real reasons: Fear of aging. Exploitative personality.
Suggested alternatives: Save money and prepare for retirement. Be nice to people so they will visit you in the home.
Reasons given: Pregnancy and childbirth are life experiences.
Real reasons: Life choices limited by social indoctrination.
Suggested alternatives: Rent pregnancy simulator. Choose different life experiences.
Reasons given: A good family is essential to career advancement and strong standing in the community.
Real reasons: Social insecurity. Wants trophy children to improve social status.
Suggested alternatives: Rent children from talent agency on special occasions. Have white picket fence installed.
Reasons given: We want to create a life which embodies our love for each other.
Real reasons: Ego, times two, minus imagination, equals three plus.
Suggested alternatives: Garden. Adopt a stream, trail, or hiway. Rescue animals. Protect & restore ecosystems to embody love.
Reasons given: I want my kids (who don't exist yet) to have all the things I didn't have.
Real reasons: Unfulfilled childhood desires and fantasies.
Suggested alternatives: Deal with regrets & make best of life. Provide for existing children.
Reasons given: To carry on family name.
Real reasons: Trying to please Dad. Duped by bloodline superstition.
Suggested alternatives: Create something enduring & give it family name. Donate blood to pass on bloodline.
Reasons given: Want to see a little me.
Real reasons: Self-absorption. Lack of ego gratification.
Suggested alternatives: Order custom-made, life-like doll. Create a gratifying life of your own.
Reasons given: God wants us to.
Real reasons: Mindless obedience to dogma peddlers who want larger flocks.
Suggested alternatives: Seek true nature of God, whatever you perceive God to be.
Reasons given: My wife/husband wants a baby.
Real reasons: Giving in out of fear of losing partner.
Suggested alternatives: Communicate true desires. Spouse may feel you're the one who wants to breed. Rent baby simulator doll.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: 36 Reasons to Adopt vs. Procreate, Part I
Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: 36 Reasons to Adopt vs. Procreate, Part I
Posted by: Opus
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Overburdened Planet on Mar 26, 2009 5:01 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Real reasons: Ego extension. Racial identity.
Suggested alternatives: Recognize value of people with different genetic makeups.
Reasons given: It's a spiritual thing for me.
Real reasons: Other reasons too easily refuted.
Suggested alternatives: Find truly spiritual experiences.
Reasons given: I've always wanted to have children, it's what people do.
Real reasons: Unquestioned cultural conditioning.
Suggested alternatives: Consider alternatives. Question expectations. Adopt.
Reasons given: To cement our relationship.
Real reasons: Fear of failed marriage.
Suggested alternatives: Communicate to strengthen relationship. Attend retreats for bonding couples.
Reasons given: I love babies.
Real reasons: Short-sighted view of reality.
Suggested alternatives: Babies soon turn into children, then adults. Infant care work is available.
Reasons given: Being a mother is a woman's highest calling.
Real reasons: Beguiled into believing compliance is noble free choice.
Suggested alternatives: Motherhood, and fatherhood, may be achieved without breeding. Many children wait for good homes.
Reasons given: My child could find a way to save the world.
Real reasons: "Mother of God" complex. (Also applies to men).
Suggested alternatives: If you want something done right, do it yourself.
Reasons given: We'd like to try for a boy/girl this time.
Real reasons: Ego extension. Gender identity insecurity. Dissatisfaction with existing offspring.
Suggested alternatives: Appreciate who you have, they might resent their sibling whose gender is preferred.
Reasons given: I just want to.
Real reasons: Just wants to.
Suggested alternatives: Choosing to breed precludes most other things you'll just want to do.
Reasons given: I want someone who will love me and not leave me.
Real reasons: Fear of rejection. Unresolved relationship issues.
Suggested alternatives: Give love to get love. Accept change and deal with loss.
Reasons given: Our economy needs young workers to replace retired workers.
Real reasons: Willing to sacrifice offspring to gods of National Economy.
Suggested alternatives: Automation reduces need for wage slaves. Consider rights of unconceived to stay that way.
Reasons given: The world needs more of us or we'll be outnumbered.
Real reasons: Elitism. Xenophobia. Eugenics easier to conceal than genocide.
Suggested alternatives: Convert others to your views so there'll be one more of your kind and one less of Them.
Reasons given: We may as well, the planet is doomed anyway.
Real reasons: Nihilistic natalism.
Suggested alternatives: Consider ethics of sentencing an innocent person to life, and death, in ecological collapse.
Reasons given: I'd like to achieve a sense of immortality.
Real reasons: Fear of death and non-existence.
Suggested alternatives: Accept mortality. Spread memes not genes. Socrates' heirs are not apparent, but his ideas linger strong.
Reasons given: My biological clock has gone off.
Real reasons: Women's normal heightened sexual desire in 30s & 40s difficult to accept in puritanical societies.
Suggested alternatives: Disarm that culturally-implanted mental time bomb. It's okay to make love and not babies.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Overburdened Planet on Mar 26, 2009 5:01 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Real reasons: Never thought about it. Unthinking conformity.
Suggested alternatives: Think before you breed, and you might not.
Reasons given: I might regret not having had the experience later, when it's too late.
Real reasons: Fear of future worries and life passing too fast.
Suggested alternatives: We can't experience everything. Far better to regret not breeding than to regret breeding
Reasons given: I do not want to deny my kids (who do not exist yet) the joy of existence.
Real reasons: Ignoring lack of joy in existing children.
Suggested alternatives: Promote existence of joy rather than imagining joy in mere existence.
Reasons given: Procreation has traditionally been a source of personal empowerment for women.
Real reasons: Feels powerless. Desires power and respect society appears to give to mothers and withholds from others.
Suggested alternatives: Mothers get more lip service than respect. Picking up family's slack is not empowering. Seek self-defined sources of power.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» One big reason to really consider ALL implications of adoption, especially the negative ones
Posted by: Beck
» Adoption issues
Posted by: truthlover
» RE: One big reason to really consider ALL implications of adoption, especially the negative ones
Posted by: exvagabond
» Prejudiced much?
Posted by: BlueTigress
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lady_L on Mar 26, 2009 5:14 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that if you want to have children, then have them if you can support and take care of them. Just don't put down the people who choose not to have children. They're not selfish; they're thoughtful, and I have seen parents who I wish had been more thoughtful about the decision to have children.
We have two children. I love them, even when I don't like what they're doing. I can't imagine life without these two bright, frustrating, sweet, strong teens, but that's me. I'm not into making choices for other people.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: You know, it's not that big a deal. You're right. Respect needs to run both ways.
Posted by: Beck
» RE: You know, it's not that big a deal. You're right. Respect needs to run both ways.
Posted by: writer7
» Terminology
Posted by: Karina
» RE: You know, it's not that big a deal
Posted by: TheNamelessCity
» Apology and a comment
Posted by: Lady_L
» "Change your catheter in a nursing home!!!"
Posted by: morticia
» Apology
Posted by: Lady_L
» RE: Apology
Posted by: stormy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ky Lake Dave on Mar 26, 2009 5:15 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My four sons have brought me more joy than any other experience in this lifetime. I am proud of these kids. I was not too sure about being a father. I did not think I was mature enough or financially stable enough to have a child. I was surprised with my first son and the twins that followed. (The 99.7% effective rating on the pill is ringing hollow at my house.) I grew into the part of father and it is amazing how motivating keeping a child fed can be for your career.
My oldest is a Senior and the twins and my adopted son are in 8th grade. Without children I would have missed out on first steps, first day of school, first words (dada x 3), first base hit, first touchdown, first dance, first play, first girlfriend and too many incredible experiences that you have to be a parent to understand. You cannot comprehend fear till your teach a 16 yr old how to drive. I owe these boys so much and can never repay them for the wonderful memories and love we have shared. I have not reached the grand parents stage of life yet but instead of worrying about getting old I am looking forward to watching my sons raise my grandchildren.
There were a couple of quotes I had responses for;
“Subsequently we have prepared responses for those who invade our personal lives with the question, "Do you have kids?" as if that is the only characteristic about us that makes us worthy to get to know. How about, "Do you travel?" "Have you been to ... ?" "What’s the last movie you saw?"“
What is the harm in asking if you have kids. People are looking for common bonds to share and have discussions. The author is way too sensitive here.
“I see having a child as a status symbol. It’s like that huge one day event we call a wedding (didn’t have one of those either) The months of preparation, cute little clothes and toys, the parties and such that results in a day of labor and boom ... reality -- marriage and/or child.”
You think status symbol when your mid diaper change, elbow deep in fecal matter looking for a wet wipe when your son pees on your chest. Oh boy!
You think status symbol when you hear of a school bus wreck with injuries on the radio and your sons are not answering their cell phones. My sons were ok, they were not on that bus but per school rules cell phones were turned off.
It is not just one huge day event or one day of labor but a lifetime commitment of joy and pain and caring for a person. You are taking on the greatest of all responsibilities, raising a baby into a person.
I applaud the author for looking into her heart and realizing that she is not the parent type. I wish more would think before they breed. If you look at a child and can not see anything more than a carbon footprint you should just say no to procreation. Your doing the world a favor.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You're right about the question about having kids. Who takes offense at mere small talk?
Posted by: Beck
» RE: I agree! Some are not ment to be parents.
Posted by: cryptique
» I can care less
Posted by: Ky Lake Dave
» RE: I can care less
Posted by: AMerrickanGirl
» RE: I agree! Some are not ment to be parents.
Posted by: Lilykins
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Mar 26, 2009 5:30 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yusandnick on Mar 26, 2009 6:02 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course, it misses the biggest argument in favor of kids--if you haven't had them, how do you know what you're missing? (Only a childless person could think the relevant trade-off is the one between kids and the Cineplex or the Bahamas.)
And (not surprisingly) it also misses the biggest argument against--namely, that the desire for kids is just a powerful genetic trick, and the children we produce will all face decay, disillusionment, and death. My kids are my greatest joy--but is this just because I've been fooled by my genes, and have I really done them a favor by bringing them here? I think about this all the time. On the other hand, I don't ever think of the "good times" I'm missing.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: i don't get it
Posted by: notmom
» RE: i don't get it
Posted by: cookiecody
Comments are closed-
Posted by: olympia43 on Mar 26, 2009 6:24 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» License to breed
Posted by: BlueTigress
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bizatch! on Mar 26, 2009 6:37 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I must say that it is a very North American attitude to be so righteous about this. When I talk to colleagues in Europe, they mention how important it is to maintain their personal life even if they have kids. That means taking time out (i.e. going for dinner; playing music in a band without incurring the wrath of one's spouse) and not centering every activity around the children. Not to do this is to become stupid and limited in social development. I have many friends who are barely literate after spending three or four years in close contact with their children!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sanford on Mar 26, 2009 6:45 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Selfish is...
Posted by: yusandnick
» RE: Selfish is...
Posted by: Sanford
» RE: Selfish is...
Posted by: buzzsaw
» No one ever got asked this, you know
Posted by: Beck
» RE: No one ever got asked this, you know
Posted by: Sanford
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Deadline on Mar 26, 2009 7:25 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: snax on Mar 26, 2009 7:39 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: One Word:
Posted by: MobileSucks
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MobileSucks on Mar 26, 2009 8:11 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» there (I was distracted. Sue me nerds)
Posted by: MobileSucks
» Oh, shut up.
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing
» Do you believe this?
Posted by: truthlover
» RE: -(
Posted by: Lilykins
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LeeAnnG on Mar 26, 2009 8:16 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All of these people have an equal right to their decisions, and I have yet to hear any of them go on and on about why their choices are justified. I've lived in cities, towns, and rural areas, and I'm almost 62 years old, but I have never, ever encountered the attitude that not having children is selfish, except for religious articles that promote prolific propagation as mandated by God. Even my religious friends have never expressed any condemnation for those who don't want children.
I have two grown children, and I am glad I do. I never was eager for them to grow up and leave home, and I was most definitely not "unhappy" in stores or restaurants when they were small. But I, along with my friends, family, and acquaintances, have the greatest respect for anyone who does not want children. How can this possibly be selfish? Having more children than one can afford, having children because they are a status symbol, or having children in order to increase the size of a religious sect - those are selfish acts.
The author may have been unfortunate in her association with people who disapprove of her choice, but the tone of the article is one of excessive protest. Why does this woman feel the need to publicly defend herself?
There are many organizations and individuals who believe the world's population is growing too fast. Increasing numbers of couples have elected not to have children. Childlessness, purposeful or otherwise, is not an anomaly that leaves one isolated and shunned.
Some people seem to have a drive to reproduce, while others don't. It's that simple, and there is no need to set up straw figures (these people who make the author feel selfish or insecure or whatever her problem is) in order to justify what is a very, very personal decision.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Protesting too much
Posted by: Martin32
» RE: Protesting too much
Posted by: spiralwriter
» Being subjected to ignorance - and apologies from me
Posted by: LeeAnnG
» RE: Being subjected to ignorance - and apologies from me
Posted by: stormy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CookieMonster on Mar 26, 2009 8:40 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing on Mar 26, 2009 8:50 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: GuitarBill on Mar 26, 2009 8:59 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would dispute that assertion.
Obviously, you lack one "biological requirement" to have child.
And I think that "biological requirement" is obvious.
:P
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Hey, shit-for-brains...
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing
» Good morning, Mr. Van Onan.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Good morning, Mr. Van Onan [you might be a little 'Heavy Duty' in your robust response
Posted by: Squarehead
» RE: Good morning, Mr. Van Onan [you might be a little 'Heavy Duty' in your robust response
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Obviously, the genius who gave me a 1 believes the author is a
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Reading is fundamental
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing
» Does she own her husband? Is he a part of her body?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Does she own her husband? Is he a part of her body?
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing
» At least I'm a product of natural birth.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: At least I'm a product of natural birth.
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing
» Any time, Honky--you fascist scumbag.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» CHILDREN!!!!!
Posted by: buzzsaw
» I'm me
Posted by: Honky the Nihilist...
» Bullsh*t
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Hey Eddie, want to talk about my father like that to my face?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Any time you like, Internet Tough Guy Bill.
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing
» Feeling lucky?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Sure you do.
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing
» Coward.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Please Be Nice...
Posted by: Rapunzel
» Excuse me, he started it.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Fuck you, liar.
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing
» By your own admission
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Fuck you, liar.
Posted by: Rapunzel
» Yes, he did start it.
Posted by: Rapunzel
» RE: Yes, he did start it.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» I might deserve it
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing
» Yeah, you're big and tough hiding behind your monitor talking smack about my father.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Your deserving it
Posted by: Rapunzel
» RE: Your deserving it
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing
» If I've learned nothing else from you, Honky, it's this:
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Your deserving it
Posted by: Rapunzel
» Obviously, it's not obvious
Posted by: truthlover
» Maybe I didn't write that comment very well :-)
Posted by: GuitarBill
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Mar 26, 2009 9:08 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Actually, having children can make the parent(s) feel younger and even happier.
Posted by: cmaciain
Comments are closed-
Posted by: notmom on Mar 26, 2009 9:11 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sanford on Mar 26, 2009 9:12 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Try this...
Posted by: pelican beak
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yurbud on Mar 26, 2009 9:17 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead, the people who have one kid tend to have more even if the first one is special needs or a pain in the ass.
If the author doesn't want to have kids that's fine, and it's one reason I think abortion should be legal--people who don't want kids may not turn out to be very good parents--but it's odd that someone feels the need to evangelize others about her choice that is unlikely to win many converts.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: If having kids is so bad, why does anyone have more than one?
Posted by: spiralwriter
» Memories aren't always exactly what they're cracked up to be
Posted by: aquariansun
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Mar 26, 2009 9:26 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
unfortunately, it means there won't be anyone around to check my feeding tubes in my last years... if I get that far.
So I ask myself, why exactly do I have to suffer extra years simply because some dipshit lawyer, doctor or medical institution is freaked out about LEGAL REPERCUSSIONS if I want to end my years early? Because I have no advocate for my conditions of care & suffering?
...maybe I don't want to drool on myself for 5 years when I'm 95?
...maybe I don't think I should have to struggle to live for months or years?
...maybe I don't believe my dogs & cats should have more mercy shown on their medical miseries than I'll ever get?
...maybe I don't believe that industrially warehousing the Aged or Infirm is a humane solution?
Being childless bears a serious follow-up question:
who will decide how you die... or how you live until you do?
perspective, people.
Perspective.
The Jeff Farias Show: streams FREE & LIVE Mon-Fri, 6-9pmEST
FREE podcast
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Having kids is no guarantee
Posted by: Eddie Van Helsing
» RE: Having kids is no guarantee
Posted by: pelican beak
» no *duh*; but, *not* having kids is *pretty much a guarantee*
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN
» RE: a decision I made in the 80s
Posted by: Gaia7
» RE: a decision I made in the 80s
Posted by: Lilykins
» you haven't thought this through...
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN
» RE: you haven't thought this through...
Posted by: Lilykins
» Behind Closed Doors: What You Don't Know about Mom's Nursing Home or Assisted Living Home can Hurt
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gravitas on Mar 26, 2009 9:27 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Best Decision I Ever Made
Posted by: tyler762
» RE: Best Decision I Ever Made
Posted by: Lilykins
Comments are closed-
Posted by: freshlemon on Mar 26, 2009 9:38 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that a family of five has five people using the resources that taxes provide. Why should they get such a huge benefit for less cost than a single or a married couple with no children.
If one wants children then they must be ready to provide for them. They should not expect the rest of society to pay for their personal desires or weaknesses. Do away with the deductible for each child or tax the number of people in a family. Or charge a surtax for each child attending public schools.
Having children or not having children is a choice. Don't make singles, senior citizens, or childless couples pay for someone elses choice to have children.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Having children serves as a social and financial entitlement to many.
Posted by: njguy73
» RE: Having children serves as a social and financial entitlement to many.
Posted by: cmaciain
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Peaceoutdawg on Mar 26, 2009 9:55 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Carole Beaton on Mar 26, 2009 9:57 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ladyratsb on Mar 26, 2009 10:17 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: My Genes Aren't Going Anywhere
Posted by: marykane
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Archie1954 on Mar 26, 2009 10:26 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: akang on Mar 26, 2009 10:29 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Coming home after a busy work day, many have been the times I collapse into chair, beer in hand, and thank the Gods I do not have a kid.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I'd rather be dead than have a kid.
Posted by: Sunfell
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Kelly on Mar 26, 2009 10:52 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» AMEN
Posted by: Karina
» RE: Just don't use the carbon footprint argument
Posted by: cmaciain
» RE: Just don't use the carbon footprint argument
Posted by: Kelly
» Good point but...
Posted by: hanakwa
» RE: Your forgetting the offsprings' footprints. (This is a logically flawed argument.)
Posted by: Quist
» *Possible* exponential growth
Posted by: Kelly
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DrJan on Mar 26, 2009 10:54 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My husband and I were certain we didn't want kids, until we reached our 40s. I had my medical career, we loved being a childless couple. But then we started to contemplate what our later years would be like, once our own parents were gone, with only one sibling between us, other relatives far away... So we adopted two precious girls, and they are the lights of our lives.
Maybe this author will change her mind, or maybe not. It's no one's business but hers.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pacto on Mar 26, 2009 11:23 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
