Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Reproductive Justice and Gender

Male Circumcision Is No Silver Bullet in Combating HIV

By Whitney Welshimer, Akimbo. Posted March 5, 2009.


Male circumcision is not full-proof. And it gives many men an excuse to avoid condoms, which puts their female partners at more risk.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

About a year ago, my colleague was visiting IWHC partners in Swaziland and drove by this billboard promoting adult circumcision. Driving too quickly to do a double-take, she returned to the site later to confirm that she had read the the billboard correctly.

Three African studies in 2006 showed that male circumcision could significantly reduce a man's risk of contracting HIV from vaginal intercourse. "Significantly" in health study-speak might not mean what you think it means though. The studies, which examined nearly 8,000 men ages 18-24 in Kisumu, Kenya and Rakai, Uganda, found that male circumcision reduced men's risk of contracting HIV from vaginal intercourse by as much as 53 percent. These studies corroborated findings from an earlier study in South Africa, which reported reductions as high as 60 percent. A 50-60% reduction is not 100%. Not by a long shot.

But since these studies were published, sliced foreskins have replaced sliced bread as the next best thing. Bad puns and gory images aside, the avid support for male circumcision among public health professionals, funders, and the public alike has often failed to ask the simple question: What does this mean for women?

Circumcision itself does not offer a man's current partner(s) (female or male) any protection from contracting HIV. Many men -- newly or previously circumcised -- assume that circumcision will fully protect them from HIV, so they feel inclined to "reap the benefits" by pushing for sex without condoms, jeopardizing their own health and that of their partner(s). Moreover, after the operation, many men do not wait the requisite six weeks to let the wound heal before having sex – again, putting their lives and that of their partner at risk. Surely, there may be some indirect benefits to women. For example, expectations of the surgery may bring men into local clinics that would not otherwise visit health services, and this can provide an opportunity to educate men on safe sex and provide access to male and female condoms.

But we all need to get our facts straight. This week, the World Health Organization (WHO), the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition (AVAC), and Family Health International (FHI) launched a website -- the Clearinghouse on Male Circumcision - to do just that. Their page about the effects of adult male circumcision on women's health includes some useful resources. Also check out Straight Talk About Male Circumcision - a post by Kate Bourne, the Vice President of International Policy & Regional Programs at IWHC, to learn more about what male circumcision means for women.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: africa, aids, hiv, circumcision

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Reproductive Justice and Gender! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
So much education needed
Posted by: Defenestrator on Mar 5, 2009 4:38 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's a shame if men have assumed that circumcision will "prevent" them from passing on HIV. By now there are few who dispute that circumcision reduces HIV transmission to men via heterosexual sex, and that in and of itself will mean that fewer women get it. But the very basic concepts about how it gets transmitted don't seem to make it into popular consciousness in Africa.

I read a story once that prostitutes in Africa so misunderstood the concept of sexual transmission that they were telling men, "anal sex only" because they thought that would prevent transmission.

Donate to AIDS Education in Africa

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Citations? Posted by: Defenestrator
ABC, not circumcision
Posted by: ml66uk on Mar 5, 2009 7:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
(I'm posting this again, as replies to other comments seem to be buried).

The studies which allegedly show a reduction in HIV among circumcised men are highly questionable. Not one of them was finished, despite the protective effect appearing to decline well below the oft-reported 60%, and several of the subjects disappearing. The fact that one study described circumcision as "comparable to a vaccine of high efficacy" seems to show clear bias. They appear to have been seeking a certain result. One has to wonder how many of the people promoting circumcision in Africa are themselves circumcised.

There are seven African countries where men are more likely to be HIV+ if they've been circumcised: Rwanda, Cameroon, Ghana, Lesotho, Malawi, Swaziland, and Tanzania. If circumcision really worked against AIDS, this just wouldn't happen. We now have people calling circumcision a "vaccine" or "invisible condom", and viewing circumcision as an alternative to condoms.

Something is very wrong here. These people aren't interested in fighting HIV, but in promoting circumcision (or sometimes anything-but-condoms), and their actions will cost lives not save them.

The latest news is that circumcised HIV+ men appear more likely to transmit the virus to women than intact HIV+ men (even after the healing period is over). Eight additional women appear to have been infected during that study, solely because their husbands were circumcised. This is not the first time that HIV in women has been linked to partner circumcision.

ABC works against HIV. Circumcision appears not to. Remember that circumcision won't make any difference unless someone is having unsafe sex with an HIV+ partner.

Female circumcision seems to protect against HIV btw, but we wouldn't investigate cutting off women's labia, and then start promoting that.

ABC (Abstinence, Being faithful, Condoms) is the way forward. Promoting genital surgery will cost African lives, not save them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ABC, not circumcision Posted by: jimberly
» RE: ABC, not circumcision Posted by: hugh7
» Torture and Abuse Posted by: laoma
» RE: Torture and Abuse Posted by: Jacko
Editor needed!
Posted by: lunink on Mar 5, 2009 10:47 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Off topic, but it is "fool proof", not "full proof".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

none.
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Mar 6, 2009 6:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is no excuse for forced genital mutilation of either male or female children.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

vexarb
Posted by: vexarb on Mar 8, 2009 9:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I heard on the BBC that a much higher success rate than 60% could be achieved by a combination of mass screening to detect carriers, plus anti-retroviral treatment to reduce the infectivity of carriers. According to a recent UN study, this could wipe out AIDS in ten years. But the UN adds "it is too expensive" - compared to what?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

T
Posted by: Tiropita on Mar 9, 2009 2:50 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
okay, but get an editor!!!! As one reader already commented, it is FOOL-proof - not FULL-proof!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Okay, but get an opinion!!!! Posted by: WyrdSister
No scientific proof that AIDS is a STD
Posted by: myanh44 on Mar 9, 2009 3:03 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The theory of HIV-AIDS is an invention of the Western world. Unfortunately the vast majority of people are led to believe that AIDS is a STD, caused by the HIV virus. But there is hardly any direct scientific evidence proving both points. The fact is HIV-AIDS has very little to do with science but a lot to do with politics, money and pride.

Please educate yourself by reading widely and not rely on what the mainstream media perpetuates. Perhaps the following you-tube movie is a good start:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FoxCtYBXNpc&feature=related

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Circumcision still NEEDS
Posted by: Opinionator on Mar 9, 2009 5:59 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a condom to prevent ANY sexually transmitted disease , which includes AIDS. Everybody out there :USA, Africa, Europe, South America etc. Does anyone know of a county without AIDS?
Circumcision is for CLEANLINESS, not birth control. REMEMBER to always use a condom, you will stay SAFE!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: condoms condoms condoms Posted by: WyrdSister
Male Circumcision stops Cervical Cancer
Posted by: sbasgall on Mar 9, 2009 8:14 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Male circumcision may not combat HIV, but it will stop cervical cancer in women and young girls will not have to be vaccinated with Gardasil. There is a direct link between having sex with an uncircumcised male and contracting cervical cancer. Lesbians who have not had sex with a male very seldom get cervical cancer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: OMG not even close! Posted by: WyrdSister
Where did this
Posted by: WyrdSister on Mar 10, 2009 11:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
really bad information come from, anyway?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Amen
Posted by: Red State Gal on Apr 1, 2009 1:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I actually groaned out loud when I first heard the news that male circumcision reduced their chance of contracting HIV. I knew what men would do--go out and get circumcised, and then act as if they were bulletproof and demand their partners accept condom-less sex . . . in the process infecting many more women than if they felt they should be cautious. Duh! Didn't these Ph.D.'s think about that???

Here's a quote by the biologist Malcolm Potts that sums it all up for me: “[T]he natural tendencies of men are not consistent with the survival and well-being of their sexual partners, their children, and future generations to come.”

I refused to have my boys circumcised, and now I feel even more strongly about it. Let the playing field be even for men and women!

Red State Gal
RedStateFeminists

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement