Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Reproductive Justice and Gender

Is Facebook Hurting Feminism?

By Dr. Logan Levkoff, Huffington Post. Posted January 17, 2009.


For years, women were led to believe that being a girlfriend or wife was a special achievement. Facebook may be bringing that mentality back.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

I feel like I spent most of my life trying to get women to realize that the success is not measured by their marital status. For years, women were led to believe that being a wife meant that you had achieved something special. I thought that our girls today were learning the exact opposite. I may have been wrong.

Yesterday I lectured at an all-girls' school. After our first class about why the word "slut" perpetuates the double standard, our second class period was devoted to a discussion about how technology affects our sexuality, sexual health, and our relationships. I said that there existed great opportunities as well as great challenges. (For the sake of this post, I will focus on only two aspects of our discussion.)

First, I disclosed that as a teenager, I didn't have email, I-Chat, Facebook, or text messaging. I did, however, have an emergency car phone that was permanently attached to the car. That being said, my experience with adolescent dating was based upon calling a boy up on the phone, passing notes to him in science class, and telling him that I liked him -- in person. Nowadays, that doesn't really happen. Teens who rely on technology to communicate never get an opportunity to talk face-to-face. Or more importantly, if they get the opportunity, they rarely take it.

We wind up losing the (necessary) intimacy and vulnerability that is part of a relationship. Remember when you actually had to call someone on the phone or knock on their door and meet their parents before picking them up for a date?

I fear that those of us who can only type our thoughts or feelings on some electronic piece of equipment will never be able to engage in an intimate relationship, because we don't know what it's like to feel vulnerable and try to avoid vulnerability at all costs. The computer screen always seems to protect us. If the object of our affection doesn't respond to a text or email we chalk it up to a SPAM filter or a network problem. When we do get a message or a text we can interpret someone's words in any way that pleases us. We never know if someone is being genuine. (And no, those emoticons don't really tell us anything -- no matter how many smiley faces or LOLs someone types!)

Needless to say, my girls were not happy. "Why should we have to talk face-to-face if we have all these options?" Now, some of this has to do with their age -- fifteen -- but I explained to them that having tough conversations was part of being mature enough to engage in a relationship. And if they couldn't do that, perhaps they weren't ready for one. And that's okay, too.

But when we started to talk about their use of social networking sites, that's when things got interesting... and scary.

A girl raised her hand. "I have a friend who only wants to be able to write 'in a relationship' on her Facebook page." Many of the girls shook their heads in agreement. "I do, too," others added.

I cringed. How is it possible that we still believe that our worth (or popularity) is dependent upon being "the girlfriend/wife/partner of so-and-so?"

While I like Facebook in many respects, I find the "Relationship Status" part completely juvenile, if not damaging. Why do we feel compelled to announce or define our relationships for everyone else? (There is already a part where you can write your interests i.e. dating, networking, etc.) Why isn't it enough to define our relationship with our partner? Why must we formally legitimize our relationships for the greater public? Is it really anyone's business?

So of course, a student asked me, "Logan, do you have your relationship status on your Facebook page?" (Yes, I have a Facebook page.)

I answered honestly.

No. I don't. Being an "Mrs." doesn't make me the person that I am. Being a sexologist, a Ph.D., contributing to my community, my work with children and teens -- those things make me the woman that I am. Being a wife is part of who I am, but certainly not the most important thing about me. And in the end, we are secure enough with our relationship that my husband doesn't need me telling everyone that I am formally attached. We know it; who cares if anyone else does?

And therein lies the lesson for all of us: girls, women, boys, and men. We are more than the title at the beginning of our name. We do a tremendous disservice to ourselves when we forget that.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: gender, feminism, facebook

Dr. Logan Levkoff is a sexologist and AASECT-certified sexuality educator.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Reproductive Justice and Gender! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Reading too much into things
Posted by: ashghost on Jan 17, 2009 8:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I often think that people whose academic careers force them to over-analyze our culture are prone to forcing larger conclusions than are actually warranted.

Facebook's "relationship status" is most definitely not driving these teens' desire to not be single. More importantly, while the tool is used to broadcast this status to others, the girls are probably more concerned about what it means to them to be in a relationship or be single than what it looks like on the exterior.

Also, this may not be as prevalent in teen boys, but I would bet that older men are also just as likely as women their age to prefer to be in a committed relationship.

The idea that this takes us back to the days when women were expected to do little more than marry well is patently ridiculous. "Relationship status" is only one of dozens of personal traits that can be listed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: eading too much into things Posted by: seaoftears
Well...
Posted by: humblesound on Jan 17, 2009 10:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm 22 and grew up to both experience being shunned for using the internet [nerd!!] as a young child and later sneered at for speaking of the idiocy of MySpace when it became all the rage.

As a young boy I know how desperately I wanted to be in a committed relationship with a girl, and having had the opportunity to mark this publicly, yeah, I'd have probably taken it. It probably would have represented the same thing that holding hands in public would have.

Now, as far as the internet causing young people to be less capable of intimacy- I don't know how to think. Personally, I know that the conversations I had on the internet as a young person caused me to be so much more introspective, socially aware, and eventually more capable of very powerful intimate conversation and sharing. I suspect, however, that I am not the norm.

I do not think it is the technology that is inherently damaging to our ability to communicate, but do put part of the blame on the increasingly mind numbing flavor of masculinity and detachment we are teaching our kids to sign up for.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This Feminist who uses facebook says...
Posted by: Lydia Encyclopedia on Jan 17, 2009 12:33 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For me, facebook is all about feminism! It's all about getting invited to NARAL pro choice America rallies going on at my university, posting articles (Ironic that I was linked to this one from facebook?) and networking with other feminists.
If their relationship status is so important to those girls, then their use of facebook's the symptom, not the disease.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why does this have to be an affront to feminism?
Posted by: faceinthecrowd on Jan 18, 2009 7:30 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's human nature to belong, to be wanted. Part of belonging, is showing others that you belong and are wanted.

Simply because the girls raised those answers is hardly an affront to feminism. Chances are extremely high that many of the boys felt the same way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Utter Rubbish
Posted by: LouLouMcStopOut on Jan 18, 2009 10:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Culturally, we in Britain have a reputation of not being able to express our emotions or show ourselves to be emotionally vulnerable. Last time i looked, using current population stats as a guide we're doing ok at the relationships thing.

It's taken me 30-odd years to realise that i have to take emotional risks in order to get what i need from a relationship. I didn't grow up with facebook or text messaging or whatever. I did grow up in an environment which emotionally repressed me (far far more than facebook ever could) and that had a profound affect.

I do like the distance the computer screen provides, and i communicate more effectively through email than any other media, yet i actually expect if i had been living in the pre-technological age, i'd have been a great letter writer; and what exactly is the difference, other than the time it takes in delivery?

My point is that we are all individual, and whether we learn these lessons at 16 or 56, we will hopefully learn them. The only way we can is through experience of doing it wrong a few times and/or having good teachers/parents who socialise us in a way which encourages healthy behaviours.

In fact, i'd go so far as to say that facebook probably helps a person come to the right conclusions about their behavioural choices: we learn far more quickly if we make the mistakes of ineffective communication and emotional distance in the first place. I didn't take risks, and i didn't make the mistakes, and that's why it's taken me so long to work it out.

And if i wanna get really generalistic (well, you did!) women are reputedly a lot better at social and emotional communication anyway, and men have always been considered to be emotionally repressed. So facebook shouldn't make a jot of difference to that: ergo, your point is not one which relates to feminism, is it?

it would be more interesting to look at the socio-cultural effect of social networking sites and teens, and how social networking has changed the way we communicate, not detracted from it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No title
Posted by: aceciul on Jan 19, 2009 3:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am in facebook, in hi5, I use emails and do send text messages, I am in a relationship, and my Facebook profiles say it, I am an art historian, a Ph.D, I do contribute to my community, and all of those things are a small part of what I am, because I am also a daughter, a sister, a girlfriend, a friend, and most of all a human being as everybody else. I am proud of my relationship and I can say it without denigrating myself or attempting to any kind of feminism or gender fight. I want to marry, I want to have children but that is just a part of my life. Denigration is when you accept to live on other’s person rules, thoughts and values… success is when you live happily doing what you think is right, and be someone’s wife is not better or worse than being someone employee, we all are reasonable beings able to transcend in the path we decide is better for us. Gender equality starts when we woman or men stop looking the other as an enemy and ourselves as a hero.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Subconscious protection?
Posted by: MAM on Jan 19, 2009 7:38 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Could it be that girls declaring that they are in a relationship is an unconscious protective mechanism? An unattached young female publicly declaring so might attract lots of unwanted solicitations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Subconscious protection? Posted by: Red State Gal
It's the School, folks
Posted by: Urstrly on Jan 22, 2009 4:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having spent three years in a girls' boarding school, it seems obvious to me tha these girls are anxious because they have no face time at school with boys. Electronics offers them their only opportunity to interact with the opposite sex. And because they are in this all-girls environment, it's especially important to "be in a relationship." It assures them and their "friends" that they are desirable, and, in some cases I suspect, that they are straight.

Sex-segregated education did wonders for my intellect, but it did little to prepare me for social life in a mixed university. The only electronic opportunity we had for interaction was a single telephone in the hall. I suppose computers and cell phones are distracting, but they give these girls an opportunity to reach for something many of them obviously miss.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This article smells like luddite
Posted by: ladyoracle on Jan 22, 2009 6:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"I fear that those of us who can only type our thoughts or feelings on some electronic piece of equipment will never be able to engage in an intimate relationship, because we don't know what it's like to feel vulnerable and try to avoid vulnerability at all costs."

And why is that bad? I am particularly thinking for teenagers, why is that bad? I avoided vulnerability as a teen by not talking to the boys face-to-face, and I didn't have the relief of an electronic venue. maybe if I had, I would have been able to overcome my shyness.

How can you say electronic relationships aren't meaningful? I married a man that I met online. Our connection travelled through e-mails and phone calls before we finally met up, but I don't think that makes our relationship less genuine. And I have been blogging since 2001, and there are some regular readers who comment to me and whose blogs I read and have read for years, and I call those people my friends and say things they said or did when I am in the company with my "real life" friends. I don't think my real life friends love me or know me more than my blogging friends. I think it is the same. Those ties are genuine. Try it yourself and see.

The good point that I think this article makes is the one about relationship status. I thought that was juvenile when I first got on Facebook, but when my husband changed his status to in a relationship with me, I was happy to concur and not make a big deal out of proving a point. But I can see how for a teenager that relationship status is a status symbol rather than a way for long lost college roommates to see that you are married or whatever is the case. It would be a far cry to say from that problem that Facebook damages feminism, but the pressures that cause girls to want that relationship status are damaging to feminism and to those feminism seeks to protect. My best advice is to work on getting groups and interests and issues that would be supportive for girls' self-esteem to show up on the sidebars more frequently than the diet ads.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Missing the point
Posted by: watercolorfire on Jan 22, 2009 9:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dr. Levkoff might want to take into account that facebook, while surely useful for networking and connecting with classmates/friends/travel companions in a platonic way, is no less a form of dating site than any other 'social networking' community. Self-conscious teenagers, male or female, are keenly aware of everyone's goings-on maritally. To ignore the show-boating element of teen culture is to completely miss the point. I know a lot of guys I went to high school with would simply neglect to fill in a relationship status to avoid having to say they were single! It's not a one-sided issue.

She may have done better to focus on the concentration of young women who force their partners into engagement for the purpose of showing off on places like facebook, though the general cultural bride obsession would be more legitimate of an argument.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What an idiotic article
Posted by: regordane on Jan 25, 2009 6:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does the author seriously think there has ever been a time when teenage girls (and many adults for that matter) didn't "feel compelled to announce or define our relationships for everyone else"?

In some ways, it's precisely because I've never used my husband's name nor called myself "Mrs" that I find it helpful to have "Married to [his name]" on my Facebook page. It makes my relationship a fact about me, not the defining characteristic of who I am. Which is exactly what the author appears to be arguing for.

And as for the notion that you can't have intimate conversations online... Well, I'll have to laugh about that in the private web forum my group of closest friends use to do precisely that when we can't get together face to face. It's a real life support that has carried people through major troubles including bereavements and serious illness. Most of us first met online through more open websites, as it happens.

But what would I know, I'm only 47.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement