Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Reproductive Justice and Gender

Obama's Cabinet Should Be Half Women

By Linda Basch, AlterNet. Posted November 10, 2008.


An open letter to Obama: Having a diverse cabinet is not only fair but good for the country.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Dear President Obama,

The confetti has fallen. The pundits have quieted. And now it is time to get down to the business of rebuilding trust in our nation both at home and abroad.

As you roll up your sleeves and consult your most trusted allies about creating a team to take this country into a more secure future, I ask you to keep something in mind: the interests of the women who played such a decisive part in your election.

That means, first and foremost, making sure that your cabinet reflects the demographic of this country. It seems only fitting, after an election with such an unprecedented presence of serious, female power that you would pledge to assemble a more gender-balanced team. There are so many women leaders poised to step into cabinet positions right now -- women heads of universities, military leaders, ranking experts in the State department, in law, advocacy, and business and in the legislatures and governors' mansions across this country.

I ask this, not in the spirit of quotas or as some sort of consolation prize, but because I know that having a diverse cabinet is not only fair but good for the country; we need the most diverse perspectives, the most developed expertise, the most innovative thinkers. If you don't draw from half the population, how can you possibly create the most capable and enlightened government?

It also seems fitting that you would make this pledge -- as have others, like Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero from Spain and President Michelle Bachelet from Chile -- because of the historic nature of your own biography. As our first African-American president and with your international experience, you know the power of broadly representative leadership. Appointing a gender-balanced cabinet would be a bold first move in confirming your commitment to genuine change we can believe in.

I recognize that you are under a tremendous amount of pressure just now. The agenda is ballooning and the dollars are shrinking. The economy hasn't been this bad, as you yourself have said, since the Great Depression. We're in the thick of two seemingly unending wars. As you translate your uplifting campaign words into transformative actions, you will be facing a challenge of proportions not seen since Franklin Delano Roosevelt first wheeled into the White House.

You've got a lot on your presidential plate...which is why the insights of highly qualified women leaders are going to be critical in the days ahead. We have so long thought of "women's issues" as the so-called soft ones -- work/family policy, healthcare, education. These all top the lists of women's concerns, but polls show that the economy, foreign policy, and the environment are equally important to women.

When I look back at your senatorial leadership, your teaching and community organizing before that, it seems that you have always sought to deal with issues without confining them to a racial, class or gender perspective; you deal in shared challenges and community-based solutions, personal responsibility and unabashed interdependence, privileging -- not degrees and demographics -- but the best ideas and the most ethical thinkers. Your style -- collaborative, open-minded, sometimes called "feminine" -- certainly is a sign of the changing times.

I only ask that if you absorb so-called "women's issues" into the rest of your agenda, that you don't lose sight of them. Women in this country are terrifically vulnerable right now. We are disproportionately affected by the failing economy -- more likely to be in foreclosure and hold sub-prime mortgages (32% more likely than men despite better credit scores), more likely to be poor, earning minimum wage (68.4% nationally), and to lack adequate health insurance. We still earn less than men, still suffer from domestic violence, still struggle to meet our most basic reproductive health needs. These challenges are not unique to women, they affect families, communities, and the nation.

We are disproportionately vulnerable, but we are not victims. In fact, we have never been so poised to play a key role in transforming this nation -- and our fellow citizens are ready for this change. A recent Pew survey showed that a vast majority (69 percent) of the public thinks that men and women make equally good leaders. They also ascribed special leadership characteristics to women including honesty, intelligence, and capacity for hard work. As a proud son, husband, and father of powerful women, I know you need little convincing that women should play a leading role in this transformation.

And, of course, congratulations.

Sincerely,

Linda Basch, President of the National Council for Research on Women

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: gender, women, obama, barack obama

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Reproductive Justice and Gender! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Sorry... but no.
Posted by: ahmlco on Nov 10, 2008 3:37 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To suggest that half his cabinet needs to be women is ridiculous.

Should we insist further that he have the correct proportions of whites, blacks, hispanics, and asians? Straights, gays, and bisexuals? Christians, Catholics, Jews, and Buddhists? Adults, teens, seniors, and children? The college educated and the high-school dropouts?

How many demographics do we need to appease?

Here's an idea: let's pick the best, brightest PEOPLE possible, and then get on with the job of solving our problems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How about wishing for having at least 1 genuine progressive in Obama's
Posted by: PakiBoy on Nov 10, 2008 7:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
cabinet?

But given Rahm Emanuel, Volker, and other neoliberals around Obama, I wouldn't hold my breath for a change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The same kind of b.s. that inflicted Sarah "I Don't Know What the Vice-President Does" Palin on us?
Posted by: Kym525 on Nov 11, 2008 10:04 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a woman and a staunch feminist. I don't WANT Barack Obama to choose his cabinet based on gender, but on ABILITY! Isn't that what we've been striving for all these years? We just got finished with Caribou Barbie, who was obviously rammed down our throats because she was a woman (and a total embarrassment to our sex) and now some women are demanding that he totally ignore whether or not his choices are ready to assume the mantles they are given. Yes, there are a LOT of qualified and capable candidates of all colors and genders, and I believe that Obama will choose wisely and reflect the diversity of the country we live in. However, I don't do tokenism, and I'm offended that the author seems to suggest that Obama not pay attention to qualifications and just base everything on gender. This once again sends the wrong message.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A fair balance is always the best
Posted by: hankhawk on Nov 11, 2008 12:24 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A person said, "I believe that Obama will choose wisely and reflect the diversity of the country we live in. Don't bet on it...let's
see what his choices are and see if it
truly reflects the diversity of our country.
I expect it to stay like it always is...80%
men...20% women -- regardless of the quality
of the choices -- he faces the same pressures
that all politicians face regardless if
they're Dem's or Rep's.

Another person says, "How many demographics do
we need to appease?" Let's not get carried away with the ridiculous by going into
all the possible categories of our society.
How about if we just start with the one
basic, inescapable class that includes
everyone of us -- male and female?

If we started with having 30% females selected
to various posts, I would expect that
many of the women would outshine the
men who had the position previously.

Having the female influence in more areas would
make our society better for it -- how could
it make it any worse than we've see as our
history shows?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Some people just DONT GET IT
Posted by: rickiey on Nov 11, 2008 8:43 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The LAST thing we need, is a president who is choosing his cabinet with an intent to "reflect diversity".

It's not the point. The point is to put the BEST PEOPLE in the cabinet.

If the best people, happens to be "50% women", great. If it is 100% women, great.

But to use gender as a basis for choosing, does a disservice to the nation.

Now, shortly someone is going to come in here, and say "oh, you poor man, whining about the possibility of less men in power". If you are thinking that, you don't get it either.

The point is to NOT DISCRIMINATE. What is the REAL reason to not discriminate? It isn't to avoid sparing the feelings of those who are not chosen.

The REAL reason not to discriminate when choosing cabinet, is to serve the country best by putting the best person in the job possible, whether they are male, female, white, black, gay, straight, orange, or polka-dotted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Let's get real Posted by: hankhawk
» RE: Let's get real Posted by: rickiey
» Bottom line choice Posted by: hankhawk
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement