Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Reproductive Justice and Gender

California's Prop 4 Jeopardizes Doctor-Patient Relationship

By Carole Joffe and Dr. Eleanor Drey, RH Reality Check. Posted November 4, 2008.


Prop 4 would turn physicians into cops, eroding their trust with younger, teenage patients.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Editor's Note: Proposition 4 is the ballot initiative that would amend the California Constitution to require parental notification for teenagers obtaining abortions. One of its least discussed aspects of the proposition is that a teen who refuses to have her parents notified may choose to have another adult relative informed, but the young woman must file a written report detailing a pattern of "abuse" at the hands of her parents, which the doctor must immediately send to either Child Protective Services or the police, and must inform the substitute adult relative about the report to law enforcement as well as the teen's abortion. Otherwise, the teen must personally appear in court to obtain a waiver from a judge. This piece draws on an interview of Dr. Eleanor Drey by Carole Joffe about this aspect of Proposition 4. Drey is a UCSF obstetrician-gynecologist and a former high school teacher who also is the medical director of Women's Options Center, an abortion clinic at San Francisco General Hospital.

I'm a doctor, not a cop. But if Proposition 4 should pass, the burden of determining whether a teen is falsely representing herself and her family will fall on me, as a physician. It would entirely shift the relationship between me and my teenage patients.

I don't want to have to ask my patients questions like,"Is that really your mother?" or "Have you given us the correct address for your aunt?"

Many people don't realize that as a health care provider, I am already a mandated reporter for abuse and rape. If there is reason for suspicion, I ask my patients, "Are you safe at home?" and "Were you forced to have sex with someone or otherwise abused?" It will be harder to build the trust to ask these sensitive questions if teens see meas a police investigator who has to verify the identities of those who came with them to the clinic. In cases of rape, we already help a patient to report the case and then work with detectives to obtain evidence.

Although it is unfortunate, I do not think that it necessarily means a teen is "abused"if she does not feel able to tell her parents about her pregnancy. Forcing her to file a write a narrative claiming a pattern of abuse by her parents that I then must file with authorities will almost certainly ruin her relationship with them-and she very likely does not want that relationship destroyed.

We do all we can at Women Options Center to encourage a teen to involve her parents in a pregnancy decision. And in most cases, teens do inform their parents, even when it is very hard for them to do so. Sometimes the positions are reversed -- parents will insist on an abortion for their 14-year-old, which the teen will not want. We then have to explain to the often desperate and sometimes furious parents that we cannot perform an abortion on anyone if it is not what she in fact wants.

Decisions about becoming sexually active, and continuing or terminating an unplanned pregnancy obviously can raise very difficult issues for teens and their families. What I have learned working at Women's Option Center is that there are no easy or one-size-fits-all solutions to these problems. If Prop. 4 passes, turning me and my colleagues into cops only will erode the trust between us and our younger, teenage patients.

We already know from what has happened in other states with these laws that these well-intentioned measures drive teens away from care. In those states, teens present later for abortions or travel out of state, both of which increase their medical risks. Moreover, some teens will take matters into their own hands to end an unwanted pregnancy, and I hate to think of the consequences. Prop 4 is truly misguided public policy that unfortunately will endanger California teens. That's why professional organizations that understand the complex lives and choices faced by teens oppose Prop. 4, including the California Medical Association, California Nurses Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, California Academy of Family Physician, Society for Adolescent Medicine and my own professional organization, the California chapter of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. We adults are supposed to protect teens, not endanger them at the ballot box or take away their ability to obtain safe medical care before they can even vote for themselves.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: abortion, parental notification, california proposition 4, prop 4

Carole Joffe is professor of sociology at the University of California-Davis, and a senior fellow at the Longview Institute.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Reproductive Justice and Gender! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Assisted Suicide
Posted by: Crazy H on Nov 4, 2008 9:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If this bill passes, more teenage girls will commit suicide.

Not that the Religious Wrong cares. So far as they're concerned, a microscopic bit of protoplasm has more rights than a living, breathing human being.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Assisted Suicide Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: Assisted Suicide Posted by: Malamute
» RE: Assisted Suicide Posted by: Malamute
» RE: Assisted Suicide Posted by: WyrdSister
I'm in favor
Posted by: rickiey on Nov 4, 2008 10:17 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm also in favor of abortion, not just in cases of rape/incest/health of the mother, but in cases where it will prevent another unwanted child being born.

That being said, I'm in favor of proposition 4.

Parents have a right to know what is going on with their children's medical care. Always.

Yes, there are some cases where teenagers won't want to tell their parents.

And there will be the rare case where there are bad parents and it would probably be best that they don't know.

But the majority of parents are GOOD parents who care about their kids, not bad parents who don't. And the laws should be designed with the assumption of good parents, not with the assumption of bad parents.

Were my daughter (heaven-forbid) to become pregnant, and to decide to have an abortion, I would want to be there to support her through it, because it's a pretty fucking rough time for a girl.

Teenagers don't always make the right decisions (hence the unwanted pregnancies when BC is readily available) and when they don't, the doctors should inform the parents so they can be there.

It shouldn't be necessary. But it is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: loophole Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: loophole Posted by: rickiey
» RE: loophole Posted by: somegirl
» RE: loophole Posted by: Ruby
» RE: not ideal, but real Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: loophole Posted by: Karen Vaughan
» RE: I'm in favor Posted by: luzmejor
I can't believe what I am reading...
Posted by: jjallison1 on Nov 7, 2008 5:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article just leaves me speechless. The fact that Carole Joffe is more worried about how she is going to be put out by having to ask a few difficult questions, then if a CHILD is about to commit an assisted murder is far, far beyond me. I thought you doctors took an oath to protect life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

no
Posted by: agota on Nov 9, 2008 7:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
last thing we want is doctors intruding into your personal life. having government and cops doing that isn't enough already?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: no Posted by: luzmejor