Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

VA Now Allows Voter Registration Drives, But Will Its New Policy Help Vets in 2008?

By Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet. Posted September 9, 2008.


With Senate pressure looming, Veterans Affairs issues a new policy after barring voter drives for most of the 2008 voter registration season.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

For the fourth time in six months, the Department of Veterans Affairs has revised its policy on allowing voter registration drives at hundreds of VA facilities serving injured and homeless veterans. Monday's announcement, on the eve of Senate hearings, said the agency would allow voter registration drives if certain conditions were met.

"The Department will welcome state and local election officials and non-partisan groups to its hospitals and outpatient clinics to assist VA officials in registering voters," the VA said in a Sept. 8 news release. "Such assistance, however, must be coordinated by those facilities in order to avoid disruptions in patient care."

Under the new rules, each VA facility will have to publish its voter registration policy, and "develop procedures to coordinate offers of assistance." VA regional counsel also will assess whether any voter registration group is "non-partisan," before allowing the organization into VA facilities to register voters, the new policy directive said.

"We are hoping that this will be fairly fast," said VA Spokesman Phil Budahn, when asked whether the new policy would accommodate veterans living at VA facilities for the November presidential election. "We don't see this as a terribly complicated process."

But voting rights advocates said the new VA policy, while moving in the right direction, was announced so near to the close of voter registration for this November -- which in half the states is four weeks away -- that it may have little impact this fall. During the past four months, when many of 2008's voter registration drives occurred, the VA has banned voter registration efforts by non-profit groups and local or state election officials.

"The new directive makes only very minor changes," said Tova Wang, Common Cause vice president of research. "The VA still has not responded to the call from voting rights groups, elections officials and members of Congress to allow it to be designated on a state by state basis as an agency that automatically provides voter registration services."

"The veteran must still affirmatively request voter registration assistance rather than it being offered as a matter of course by the agency," Wang said, referring to state motor vehicle departments, where voters are asked if they want to register to vote. "And while the VA softens the language with respect to third party registration drives, it seems to primarily allow decisions about access by such groups to be left to local discretion."

Scott Rafferty, a Washington-based attorney who sued the VA in 2004 over the voter registration drive issue at its facility in Menlo Park, California, said the new directive suggested that the agency was not doing all it could to veterans vote in the upcoming presidential election. The burden was now on the VA to help vets vote, he said.

"In view of their admission that their prior policy was inadequate, they (VA) need to take responsibility for affirmatively assisting every veteran," Rafferty said. "They have denied partisan and non-partisan groups the opportunity to assist with voter registration. Now it is their job to get that done before the (2008) voter registration deadlines."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: senate, veterans, voter registration, veterans affairs

Steven Rosenfeld is a senior fellow at Alternet.org and author of Count My Vote: A Citizen's Guide to Voting (AlterNet Books, 2008).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Politics! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Why did it happen in the first place?
Posted by: VetAgainst McCain on Sep 9, 2008 12:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Imagine serving in Iraq, getting blasted by a roadside bomb, losing a leg and ending up in a stateside VA hospital where some tight-ass Republican big wheel says you can't register to vote?

Fucking incredible!

Vet Against McCain
To find out why, click on the links below
VietnamVeteransAgainstJohnMcCain.com
VoteVets.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More vgoter suppression by the Republicans--
Posted by: ProgGrandma on Sep 9, 2008 4:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What we have here is yet another Republican attempt to suppress the vote. It is outrageous that the VA would not want to actively vets not only to register but to ensure that they are able to vote--what kind of stink can be raised in the main-stream media about this situation--what can we do as individual citizens?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What the hell is wrong with you people?
Posted by: VetAgainst McCain on Sep 9, 2008 8:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Only TWO posters on this AlterNet thread so far, including me!

That kind of indifference is why McCain and Palin will win in November. Get your selfish heads out of your selfish assholes, people!

A vet against McCain
To find out why, click on the links below
VietnamVeteransAgainstJohnMcCain.com
VoteVets.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

repeat of before, supress and target anyone who is..
Posted by: thealltheone on Sep 9, 2008 10:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
against them, this time amongst other targets, it is the military! I posted this on another Alternet article today; if you want to support the troops listen to what they have to say! go to; Vietnam veterans against John McCain, IVAW Iraq veterans against the war, veterans against the Iraq war, POW's & MIA's united, Iraq & Afghanistan veterans of America, Operation Truth...so many! so of course they are going to do what they can to suppress you! In a small town of Kerville Texas last election, all the mail outs to Spanish speaking minorities and elderly people was misprinted so that you had not choice but to vote republican, they were all returned and they said, it was a misprint, yea, right! Last time I voted in a primary, I voted straight Democrat even though I am a registered Independent, and when I went back to recheck my votes, over half had been changed to Republican. When I made a stink about it, the lady next to me decided to check her votes, and the same thing happened to her. Have to have a paper trail, but if you see what happened in Arizona last Sat. it still did not matter! Damn it pisses me off, and it is why I hate when people blame the American public for what is going on, how can you win a fair election if it is out right fraud! Recheck your votes before you leave that machine! Report it and yell loud!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Every Vet deserves to vote...more than the rest of us!
Posted by: hollymoodyb on Sep 9, 2008 12:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is a travesty that vets aren't being offered the opportunity to register to vote. There is no other group in this country who has earned this priviledge. Veterans, and current members of the military deserve to have the opportunity to choose who puts them in harms way, or who will control their ability to get the help that they need once they return.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]