Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Needed Now: A Constitutional Amendment Ensuring the Right to Vote

Advancement Project. Posted July 30, 2008.


The time has come to amend the Constitution to guarantee the individual right to vote, a prominent civil rights group declares.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Most Americans would probably be surprised to learn that there is no provision of the Constitution or federal law that affirmatively guarantees all citizens the right to vote. Neither the U.S. Constitution nor the 1965 Voting Rights Act nor any other federal law explicitly ensures such a right. Even the post-Civil War amendments to the Constitution do not explicitly guarantee the right to vote to all citizens.

Now is an ideal time to ensure the right to vote for people of color, who are disproportionately disenfranchised, and all Americans. In this heated election season, state legislatures throughout the nation are considering bills that would complicate the process by requiring photo identification and citizenship documents in order to vote.

Over the past two years, Advancement Project has been working to devise a way to guarantee voting rights in federal law to end practices that unnecessarily disenfranchise voters. We have identified the strategies that would be most effective in raising public awareness about limitations on the right to vote and the need for major reform.

The absence of an explicit federal provision conferring this fundamental right has left Americans at the mercy of state constitutions, state legislatures, local bureaucrats, and the judiciary. The states determine who is qualified to vote and establish the rules and conditions for holding elections. Not surprisingly, the combination of unduly burdensome procedures, underfunded bureaucracies and partisan officials has created a patchwork of arbitrary practices tending to contract, rather than expand the franchise. The result, as documented by scholars, is that more than nine million Americans are known to be disenfranchised by idiosyncratic legal restrictions on who is qualified to vote. Millions more are excluded by unnecessary hurdles to registration and voting and by election administration errors.

According to one academic researcher, the U.S. is one of only 11 democratic countries that do not explicitly provide the right to vote in their constitutions. According to Professor Jamin Raskin, one of the leading academic authorities on voting rights, constitutional silence on a basic right to vote leaves the United States in miserable, backward company with such regressive nations as Iran, Libya, and Singapore ... "

Advancement Project analyzed the possibility of amending the Constitution to guarantee explicitly that all citizens have a fair, equal, and inclusive voice in our democracy. We also looked at the option of seeking a federal statute to enshrine the right to vote in federal law.

Enshrining an affirmative right to vote explicitly in the Constitution or federal law would ensure a uniform set of voting laws throughout the nation, rather than an assortment of inconsistent voting guidelines. A constitutional amendment provides more certain and solid protection of the right to vote, when compared to a federal statute. However, amending the Constitution is a difficult, arduous, and lengthy process. It may be useful to work towards passing both a federal statute and a constitutional amendment.

An explicit right to vote guaranteed by a constitutional amendment could be compared to the First Amendment right guaranteeing free speech because free speech rights are the same regardless of the voter's state of residence. If incorporated into the Constitution, the right to vote -- like the right to speak one's mind -- will become a right that travels with the citizen.

Enshrining an affirmative right to vote is more than a single, isolated initiative. It requires a broad, national movement. It is a long-term undertaking.

PDF link to the report: http://www.advancementproject.org/pdfs/RTV-Report-Final-Printed-Version.pdf

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: constitution, voting rights, disenfranchisement

Advancement Project is a democracy and justice action group. Using law, public policy and strategic communications, it acts in partnership with local communities to advance universal opportunity, equity and access for those left behind in America.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Politics! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Yes! That's what We Need...
Posted by: ranchero42 on Aug 1, 2008 3:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But first, let's send four or five Supreme Justices on a barnstorm tour of the midwest. Let's start with unmanned airports in Minnesota...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yes! That's what We Need...
Posted by: ranchero42 on Aug 1, 2008 3:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But how long before we get a Supreme Court that will find it fits into their personal beliefs? Several of the present ones seem to believe that only "landed gentry" should be allowed to vote. You only hope that twelve years of "Anybody Not Republican" will be sufficient.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

what good
Posted by: chiefwanadubie on Aug 4, 2008 5:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is a constitutional amendment, when there is no constitution, what good, does it do to vote, when your not allowed to run, or even to pick whose running!!! AMERICA'S DEMOCRACY, has become a "DEMOCKERY"!!! I vote, for none of the above, not one person in our whole government represents me or mine, they all have become corporate puppets!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How the suffragettes got their amendment passed
Posted by: Virginia Harris on Aug 4, 2008 6:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you are interested in the many exciting and surprising twists and turns that played into women winning the vote in England and America, I hope you will check out "The Privilege of Voting."

It is a new and exhaustively researched historical e-mail series that goes behind the scenes in the lives of eight well-known women from 1912 to 1920 to reveal the sexy, shocking truth of HOW the suffragettes won the vote.

Presented via e-mail in a unique, sequential, interwoven short-story format called Coffeebreak Readers - it makes discovering the delightful heroines of women's suffrage history easy and fun!

The women depicted include two of the most beautiful and outspoken suffragettes -- Alice Paul and Emmeline Pankhurst, along with Edith Wharton, Isadora Duncan, Alice Roosevelt, and two stunning presidential mistresses.

There are weddings and funerals, babies in peril, damsels in distress, war, peace, broken hearts and lots of hot affairs on the rocky road to the ballot box.

The best part is it's ALL true!

Each action-packed e-mail episode takes about 10 minutes to read, so they are perfect to enjoy on coffeebreaks, or anytime.

You can subscribe to receive free twice-weekly e-mails at:

http://www.CoffeebreakReaders.com/tpovpage.html

I would be interested to hear your opinion on the series should you choose to subscribe.

Best to you,


Virginia Harris
Series Author
Publisher
www.CoffeebreakReaders.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ideology
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Aug 5, 2008 2:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As I understand it the court is supposed to weigh the EVIDENCE and use THE LAW (both existing, statutes & common) to make their decisions. The current crop of IDEALOGUES that have been recently confirmed to the bench, they are the reactionaries, legislating from the bench!

Voting does need to be standardized and we need to have the paper ballots for a trail that we can go back to! As anyone that has worked on a computer can tell you - they do freeze up, they can be hacked, they do have issues! And as any computer hacker will tell you there is always a way around the system!

The reality is this country is moving further and further away from the big "D" Democracy to fascism, and that of course the rich and powerful will be in charge.

There is a poem I think it was written by Eli Wiesel and the whole point is that he didn't stand up when they took away the Pole, the Red, the Infirmed, yet when they came for him no one was left to help him out. America wake up, it is time to come together despite party differences, for the good of the many, for the survival of us all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]