Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

VA Retreats on Voter Registration Efforts for Wounded Veterans

By Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet. Posted May 8, 2008.


The Department of Veterans Affairs says it will help ex-soldiers to register and vote, yet it won't allow registration drives on VA facilities.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The Department of Veterans Affairs has retreated on a recently announced policy to allow voter registration drives at its facilities where veterans' groups and others would assist wounded former soldiers to participate in the 2008 presidential election.

"It is VHA (Veterans Health Administration) policy to assist patients who seek to exercise their right to register and vote; however, due to Hatch Act (Title 5 United States Code (U.S.C.) 7321-7326) requirements and to avoid disruptions to facility operations, voter registration drives are not permitted," the new policy directive by Michael J. Kussman, Under Secretary for Health said.

The Hatch Act restricts political activities by federal employees.

The VA directive rolls back a new policy announced in late April where the agency agreed, after mounting public and political pressure, to assist wounded veterans with registering to vote and voting for federal elections. While the VA still says it will help former soldiers on an as-requested basis with registration and voting, curtailing voter registration drives brought swift condemnation from Capitol Hill and advocacy groups.

"We believe that the earlier directive better addressed the need for a consistent voter registration policy for our veterans," Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and John Kerry (D-MA) said in a May 6 letter to VA Secretary James B. Peake. "While the changes made in the new directive seem small, the impact is large. It appears to us that the Department took one step forward for our veterans and the right to vote by directing that assistance be provided with voter registration and with securing absentee ballots, but then took a large step back by prohibiting voter registration drives."

The Senators questioned the Hatch Act claims, saying the "Office of Special Counsel has made it clear that federal employees, even those who are considered to be in sensitive positions, may "assist in voter registration drives."" And they questioned how voter registration drives would disrupt VA activities.

"We would appreciate knowing the type of disruptions the VA envisions might occur during voter registration drives by nonpartisan organizations, such as the League of Women Voters or veterans' organizations, and why any potential disruption could not be addressed by less restrictive means," the said.

The VA press office did not respond to several calls seeking a further explanation of the new policy late Thursday afternoon.

Veterans' advocates were more than disappointed.

"VA's decision, during wartime, to block voter registration for our hospitalized veterans is shameful, outrageous, and despicable," said Paul Sullivan, executive director of Veterans for Common Sense. "VCS finds it unconscionable that VA would reverse position and prohibit voter registration efforts for our wounded, injured, ill, and disabled veterans in VA hospitals and nursing homes as more and more casualties flood home from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: veterans, kerry, feinstein, veterans affairs, hatch act

Steven Rosenfeld is a senior fellow at Alternet.org and co-author of "What Happened in Ohio: A Documentary Record of Theft and Fraud in the 2004 Election," with Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman (The New Press, 2006).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Politics! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
When Obama gets sworn in,
Posted by: hurricane hugo on May 8, 2008 2:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The VA is the first house that has to be swept clean.

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Vastly underreported story
Posted by: war_on_tara on May 8, 2008 3:50 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a VA patient & have never seen this problem mentioned anywhere except here on AlterNet.

To take Hugo's comment above a bit further, Obama should bring the subject up in a debate and watch McCain sputter (no doubt).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Sickening Barometer...
Posted by: gazooks on May 8, 2008 7:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... of what we've become as a nation.

Fuck the Vets that are too damaged from doing their perceived sacred duty to protect "freedom", to get to the polls, to have a say. What a sad joke.

No resources for that sort of thing in the next 200b blank check allocated to conduct the never ending war of global, corporate ambition.

George Worthless piece of shit Bush. You cowardly, hypocrite of a lying puppet pig. And Congress? Simply a mass contradiction of principle by tiny commercial minds.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hmm, maybe alittle clarification is required here...
Posted by: whathaway on May 9, 2008 4:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
About 4 weeks ago, there was a voter registration drive at my VA facility that lasted a few days. It was tabled by an non VA, nonpartisan community organization and was positioned prominently in a busy hall area near the canteen. I saw both employees and veterans signing registration cards at the table.

Yes, as an employee at the VA I am reminded often of the Hatch Act by our HR dept. I believe the policy referred to in the article is more about VA employees engaging in registration drives during tour hours. I am not sure, but I don't think there is a policy against community organizations doing a drive in the "semi-public" spaces set aside in many VA facilities.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One more Example
Posted by: JSquercia on May 9, 2008 12:38 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is just one more example of HOW the administration supports the TROOPS . I wonder if their miltary ID will suffice as Voter Identification .
For those who might have missed it there was a story about a group of Nuns living in a convent across from Notre Dame who were REFUSED ballots because they had no required Voter ID . The ironic part was it was a fellow Nun who had to refuse them . Many were elderly and handicapped physically making a trip to the Motor Vehicle Office difficult to say the least . Someone said the Id's are Free and thus not a burden ; but it was pointed out that while the ID might be free the supporting documents might NOT be Free OR even easy to acquire . Birth Certifcates for example are not free in New York City and for those who have moved away from their place of Birth might be difficult to obtain

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the right to vote, the freedom to vote are in jeopardy
Posted by: CJC on May 9, 2008 9:56 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A fundamental part of democracy is the right, indeed the responsibility, of citizens to vote.
So barriers to registration, barriers to getting into your polling place, barriers to being determined qualified by having your name on the voter list, barriers to access to the ballot once you are there - not having to stand in line for hours, for example, and barriers to having confidence that the process of voting itself is fair and accurate all undermine our polity. For the VA to use the Hatch Act, which I understand to be about partisan politics, to prevent voter registration - not campaigning etc - is just preposterous. Because we now have a Republican administration these tactics are generally aimed at preventing potential Democrats from participating, but I think entrenched Democrats have behaved the same way.

It's shameful and appalling, no matter who is doing it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

they united, to divide
Posted by: chiefwanadubie on May 11, 2008 8:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the last free presidential election in America was in 1960!!! Since J.F.K.s murder, the powers that be, pick who will even be on the ballot!!! yes we still have the right to vote, but only for their choice of government/ corporate puppets!!! With the republicans approval rating at the lowest percentage ever, they are looking for new and improved ways, to forbid they're competition from voting or even running against them!!! As governor Blunt signed a bill to have me disqualified from running against him!!! I dare call it treason!!! Of all those forbidden to vote, felons, nuns, veterans, aged, and the poor, the percentage of republicans, could not be more than 1%!!! Satan takes care of it own, and we have defiantly given our nation to the beast!!! It is now getting pretty obvious who they are!!! END TERRORISM: VOTE THEM OUT!!! if GIVEN ANOTHER CHANCE!!! BEWARE and PREPARE, FOR THE MARK OF THE BEAST!!! DIVISION, DESTROYED THE UNITED STATES, ONCE, BUT FOR ALL!!! THEY UNITED,only to divide!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]