Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Texas Prosecutes Little Old Ladies for Voter Fraud

By Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet. Posted March 31, 2008.


State's Attorney General has prosecuted Democrats who help seniors vote by mail while ignoring documented Republican ballot box stuffing.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Willie Ray was a 69-year-old African-American City Council member from Texarkana who wanted her granddaughter, Jamillah Johnson, to learn about civil rights and voting during the 2004 presidential election. The pair helped homebound seniors citizens get absentee ballots, and once they were filled out, put them in the mail.

Fort Worth's Gloria Meeks, 69, was a church-going, community activist who proudly ran a phone bank and helped homebound elderly people like Parthenia McDonald, 79, to vote by mail. McDonald, whose mailbox was two blocks away from her home (she recently died), called Meeks "an angel" for helping her, a friend of both women said.

And until he recently moved out of state, Walter Hinojosa, a retired school teacher and labor organizer from Austin, was another Democratic Party volunteer who helped elderly and disabled people vote by getting them absentee ballots and mailing them.

Today, Ray and Johnson have criminal records for breaking Texas election law and faced travel restrictions during a six-month probation. Gloria Meeks is in a nursing home after having a stroke, prompted in part, her friends say, by state police who investigated her -- including spying on Meeks while she bathed -- and then questioned her about helping McDonald and others to vote. Hinojosa, meanwhile, has left Texas.

Their crime: not signing their name, address and signature on the back of the ballots they mailed for their senior neighbors, and carrying envelopes containing those ballots to the mailbox. Since 2005, Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott, a Republican, has been prosecuting Democratic Party activists, almost all African-Americans and Latinos, as part of an effort to eradicate what he said was an "epidemic" of voter fraud in Texas.

"These guilty pleas demonstrate precisely why it is so important to uphold the integrity of our election process in the state," Abbott said, speaking of Ray and Johnson's conviction in a press release. "We will visit justice upon any who ignore the fact that we have election laws in Texas and they apply to everyone."

But Texas Democrats, such as Lisa Turner of the Lone Star Project, onestarproject.net a political action committee that first exposed Abbott's prosecutions, issued reports on it and maintains a staff to fight voter suppression in the state, said Abbott's goal is not merely to prosecute little old ladies. Rather, Turner said it was to send a message to Texas' minority communities, which lean Democratic, by sowing fears among the elderly about voting by mail.

"It's the equivalent if when a gang moves into a neighborhood and spray paints their graffiti or their marker; it's not to deface one building. It is to send a message," Turner said. "You have agents of the attorney general, walking through a neighborhood, walking past three crack houses, to go talk to a voter. Think about that. What does that say their priorities are? It's about holding onto the levers of power."

Attorney General Abbott and the election laws that he has used to bring the prosecutions have been challenged in federal court under a suit that is slated to go to trial this spring. In September 2006, Gerry Hebert, a former chief of the U.S. Department of Justice's Voting Section -- which oversees the nation's voting rights laws -- and now executive director of the Washington-based Campaign Legal Center, filed a suit challenging the Texas attorney general, secretary of state and a 2003 Texas law that criminalized practices often used to help the elderly to vote by mail.

Abbott's office would not comment on the suit, but Texas Solicitor General Ted Cruz, who works for Abbott, issued a statement in September 2006 saying it "has no basis in law" and "the plaintiffs are combination of political operatives and individual criminals who have already pleaded guilty to voter fraud."

Meanwhile, Texas' attorney general has continued to prosecute middle-aged and elderly political volunteers under a law his office says stops people from impersonating voters and taking advantage of seniors by falsifying ballots. The accused are almost all African-American and Latino and likely Democrats.

In February 2008, Abbott indicted four Duval County residents, Lydia Molina, 70, Maria Soriano, 71, Elva Lazo, 62, Maria Trigo, 55, for allegedly delivering "mail-in ballot applications to numerous residents in Duval County, many of whom were ineligible to vote by mail," his press release said. Under Texas law, only the disabled, people 65 or older, or people expecting to be out of state on Election Day can vote absentee. The accused checked a box saying voters were disabled "when they were not," he said, referring to their actions in the 2006 election.

"The voter registrar's office then mailed the actual ballots to the residents," Abbott's release said. "Once the ballots were completed by the residents, the defendants allegedly retrieved these and mailed them to the registrar to be counted without identifying themselves on the carrier envelope." They face six months and a $2,000 fine.

Only likely Democrats prosecuted

Despite Abbott's repeated declarations nobody is above Texas law, he has prosecuted no Republicans.

"What is especially troubling is that while Greg Abbott's office has prosecuted minority seniors for simply mailing ballots, he has not prosecuted anyone on the other side of the aisle for what appear to be open and shut cases of real voter fraud," Hebert told Texas House Elections Committee, on January 25, 2008, as the panel held a hearing on a bill making the state's voter I.D. laws tougher.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: texas, voter fraud, mail, vote by mail, elderly

Steven Rosenfeld is a senior fellow at Alternet.org and co-author of "What Happened in Ohio: A Documentary Record of Theft and Fraud in the 2004 Election," with Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman (The New Press, 2006).

This article and future coverage of election challenges to our democracy on AlterNet are in part are supported by Credo Mobile Action. Credo Action offers tools for working for change and a unique mobile phone service where you don't have to worry about your phone being tapped. You also get competitive rates, nationwide all-digital coverage, courteous customer service, cutting-edge phones and a variety of plans from which to chose.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Politics! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Election monitoring
Posted by: chuckjs on Mar 31, 2008 3:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think it is long past time for the citizens of the US to stand up and be counted. You should demand your country allow impartial election monitors, from other independant democratic nations, to monitor and freely speak about the raw corruption in your electoral system. You owe it to the rest of the world as a self spoken protector of the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: lection monitoring Posted by: willymack
» RE: lection monitoring Posted by: lenioui
» NOT TRUE Posted by: gellero1
» RE: NOT TRUE Posted by: lenioui
Voter Fraud?
Posted by: pkricker on Mar 31, 2008 4:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That would be a Republican politician within 25 miles of a polling place any day of the year and should be punishable by extreme extradition.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Apologies Posted by: pkricker
Why such an annoying headline?
Posted by: www.suekatz.com on Mar 31, 2008 4:58 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Little old lady? That's a rather condescending, dated way of talking about older women, no? Why taint an otherwise important article with that kind of headline?
Sue

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It worked. Posted by: colinmeister
» RE: Why such an annoying headline? Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» Jesus, calm down people... Posted by: Moira61
» RE: Jesus, calm down people... Posted by: aonghus36
Must BE
Posted by: JSquercia on Mar 31, 2008 5:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There MUST BE MASSIVE voter Fraud in Texas . How else could you explain the election of a Drunkin Draft Dodger the office of Governor .
It would certainly seem that all this voter "fraud" hasn't helped the Dems very much

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Must BE Posted by: chuff8
Shouldn't Rush Limbaugh be prosecuted?
Posted by: KeepsonTickn on Mar 31, 2008 5:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Someone should send a copy of this article to the Ohio Attorney General. It might help resolve some confusion he seems to have over what sort of vote fraud offense should and should not be prosecuted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Florida and Texas,
Posted by: Ellie1 on Mar 31, 2008 5:45 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
two states that can't do ANYTHING right except select the most crooked politicians out there. So glad I don't live in a red state. They SUCK.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Florida and Texas, Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: texans vote for the bush clan Posted by: carcinoid112
» I want to move back to my red state home Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» I hear you, Illiteratilumen Posted by: joeunix
» RE: I hear you, Illiteratilumen Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» Not true Posted by: joeunix
» How to get Hoosier tail... Posted by: Illiteratilumen
The Former Democracy of the USA
Posted by: manatthewindow on Mar 31, 2008 5:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Civilization's brief experiment with democracy is almost over now. Even a cursory glance at the history of our societies should reveal that we are now returning to the standard form of government that has prevailed throughout most of recorded time.

A brutal and ruthless elite holding sway over a slave base is the norm. Any attempt to resist that model must be sustained with the same degree of dedication, determination and vigilance that is practised by the self-selected ruling classes -- otherwise the elite/slave order is quickly restored.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» most of recorded time Posted by: e rice
Training ground
Posted by: sawdust on Mar 31, 2008 6:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Such discriminatory practices and Repugnican abuses are standard political business proceedures of the day, here in TX. G W Bush got his training on voter registration and abuse here, before moving along to Washington, and Karl Rove helped to fine-tune it.The learning curve was expanded into FL in the last two elections. We Texans have made art forms out of abusing elderly and minority groups and picking on those who are least able to defend themselves.It should be a matter of state-wide shame, but seems rather to be carried around like a banner of honor by the AG and the Governor's offices. Would somebody please rain on this parade?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Training ground Posted by: greenthumb
» RE: Training ground Posted by: carcinoid112
Take it from me, Texas is a Red state (with a capital "R")
Posted by: joeunix on Mar 31, 2008 6:58 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Lone Star State is a Republican stronghold; therefore, it's naive to expect justice for the Democratic Party in Texas.

The Democratic Party of Texas has a joke about the situation, which goes something like this: The Democratic Party of Texas could meet in a phone booth.

Thus, surrounded by "conservatives", rednecks, Klansmen, good old boys, and right-wing "christian" churches on virtually every street corner, I left Texas for good 12 years ago, and I couldn't be happier. `;^)

They can have the Lone Star State for all I care.

==========
Proud Ex-Texan.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My Biracial Perspective...
Posted by: dave1616 on Mar 31, 2008 7:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please see www.discussrace.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Paul Cardwell
Posted by: Paul Cardwell on Mar 31, 2008 8:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Before the Democrats cry too loudly, let's remember the racist law still on the books passed by Dems to destroy Parti La Raza Unida. This was a south Texas regional party mainly of Spanish-speaking citizens. When they managed to take control of Zapata County, the Dem government sent four state accountants full-time to try to find a typo in the finances.

Failing that, they passed a law requiring a petition of registered voters who did not vote in any party primary amounting to ten percent of the last total vote for governor. For a regional party, this was impossible to do statewide and so the party died, leaving only Republicrats. The Grace Corporation funded a petition drive to get the Libertarians on the ballot, where they remain as the "none of the above" vote, but keeps off Greens and other more rational parties of dissent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What Little Old Ladies?
Posted by: BST on Mar 31, 2008 8:58 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How tiresome is this silly headline

...Little Old Ladies

For one thing, men are interviewed and for another, older people are a very powerful force that this kind of fuzzy-thinking headline diminishes to impotence and frailty.

It does a disservice to the article which is really about Democrats taking a hit while the GOP does not. It's not about Little Old Ladies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» sue katz gets slammed Posted by: e rice
in a media saturated culture
Posted by: e rice on Mar 31, 2008 9:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it is necessary to recognize propaganda and manipulation even when it is used by people you agree with.

the title and the illustration of this article are propaganda and manipulation.

is it worse to persecute (not prosecute--i chose the word deliberately) elderly women than elderly men? than young women? 'little old ladies' carries connotations of helplessness, unnecessary fussiness and unworldliness. the use of the phrase here implies a greated degree of abuse on the part of the state--as if any greater degree is necessary to make the point that the state is behaving outrageously. it condescends to the elderly women who are out in society making a dedicated effort and ignores the elderly man who was also targeted.

the illustration would have been at home in any magazine from the 1920s onward--even though increasing numbers of women of all ages have worn pants since the 1930s--60 year old women in the 1960s were wearing pants without a second thought. even if most women did wear skirts and dresses today, they would not wear ankle length shirtwaist dresses with peter pan collars. i'd be willing to bet that the majority of women in their 60s today do not have hair long enough to be put into a bun--and those that do seem to wear it in pony tails.

uisng an icon that is as completely unrelated to reality as this is media manipulation of the worst sort.

why not a title on the order of 'state prosecutes senior activists'? or even 'state prosecutes activists'? really, what has their age got to do with it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Age has EVERYTHING TO DO WITH IT Posted by: Prairie Waif
» you have a point Posted by: e rice
Why not?
Posted by: MikeOckhurtz on Mar 31, 2008 9:47 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the state that brought the nation George W. Bush, the most atrocious and despicable person every born in America, it just makes sense that they put in jail honest God Loving people who believe in Democracy. What else could explain such a contrarian endeavour. Texas, is ass-backwards, always has been and it always will be. I will NEVER go to Texas for any reason. (Period.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Bush is not a Texan. Posted by: joeunix
» RE: Bush is not a Texan. Posted by: MikeOckhurtz
» Say What? Posted by: tornadorider2002
» He/she watched "Dynasty" Posted by: joeunix
Justice for the Lone Star Elite (Republicans)
Posted by: HughScott on Mar 31, 2008 10:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Four years ago while doing research for my nonfiction book about Bush, I called several Democratic Party officials in Midland, TX, and asked if Shrub had ever been charged with a DUI during his 15-year residence there. I was answered by laughter.

The Dem heads then explained that Bush was part of the Lone Star Elite (Republicans) who were immune from the Texas criminal justice system.

Later, in my book, I wrote the following:

Page 174 from the family biography, George & Laura, described Bush driving while intoxicated on numerous occasions despite his earlier DUI in Maine. "There were many close calls in those days," confided Dub-ya later to a friend.

After boozing for two decades, most of it in Midland, Texas, George asked himself rhetorically in his autobio, A Charge to Keep, "How in the hell did I keep from killing someone else?"

Here's a question that's not rhetorical. Dub-ya went to Maine, got a DUI and tried to hide it during the 2000 election. So why didn't the Midland Police Department ever charge him with the same offense? They had at least 15 years to catch him driving under the influence, nearly a daily occurrence, according to his friends. Could it be Dub-ya was in a special class like his wife, Laura? Did the cops ignore him like they did her?

In 1963, Laura, a Midland teenager busy chatting with her girlfriend passenger, drove through a stop sign, T-boned a car that had the right-away and killed its driver. Guess what kind of traffic citation she got?

She didn't. Incredibly, the future First Lady committed negligent homicide, an offense
ordinary people in Midland would've gone to jail for, and she didn't even have to pay a fine.

So what kind of legal system was that, anyway? Back then, it was called "Justice for the Lone State Elite" in a state that tried ordinary teenagers Laura's age as adults and put them in prison for years simply because they inhaled fumes from a burning marijuana leaf.

Lower status kids were punished for smoking pot that only harmed themselves (maybe), but it was perfectly okay to commit negligent manslaughter with an automobile if you were like Laura, part of the Lone Star Elite.

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam veteran, ex-USAF pilot, lifelong registered Republican and author of George Dub-ya Bush, THE PHONY FIGHTER PILOT, published in 2004.

To read a sample chapter and learn about the only smoking-gun proof of White House corruption ever found on the Web, visit www.PhonyFighterPilot.com.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How can we hold Republicans accountable?
Posted by: executive gadfly on Mar 31, 2008 10:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Such underhanded techniques are commonplace for the Republicans, and voting and public dialogue aren't enough. We need civil disobedience and popular demonstrations on an unprecedented scale in this country. Imagine if everywhere a conservative spoke, we had people showing they will put their bodies on the line to show no tolerance for conservative policies anymore:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TlNm7kA9ojc

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HOW WE CAN DO MORE TO STOP REPUBLICANS
Posted by: executive gadfly on Mar 31, 2008 10:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Such underhanded techniques are commonplace for the Republicans, and voting and public dialogue aren't enough. We need civil disobedience and popular demonstrations on an unprecedented scale in this country. Imagine if everywhere a conservative spoke, we had people showing they will put their bodies on the line to show no tolerance for conservative policies anymore:
linked text

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dosen't suprise me about Texas....
Posted by: eosrk on Mar 31, 2008 11:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for it's not a minority-friendly state anyway...just look at its executions over the years...but then again, what state is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My toddler voted too, once for me
Posted by: solitarysherlockian on Mar 31, 2008 11:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So Texas has nothing better to do but bust voters? Good it is past when they could bust me for letting my then Nursery School aged child vote for me in the 1980s on my Absentee Ballot. Was trying to teach him about the importance of voting. Get a life Texas. American Idiot is on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Deb
Posted by: debmcd on Mar 31, 2008 2:20 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know why anybody would join the Republican party. They are a bunch of racist pigs. They wouldn't know how to play by the rules if they're live depended on it. What a bunch of NANCY BOYS. They can't win by defending their standing on the issues because they stand for nothing unless in enriches them. So in order to stay in power even if they don't deserve to be in power, they cheat any way they can. They cheat and lie.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» NANCY BOYS???? Posted by: joeunix
» RE: NANCY BOYS???? Posted by: writer7
» RE: NANCY BOYS???? Posted by: tornadorider2002
Mr. Rosenfeld is misinformed.
Posted by: lobdillj on Mar 31, 2008 3:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Rosenfeld has been talking to the wrong people. And before you get the impression that I am a Republican I’ll tell you that I am a progressive Democrat whose philosophy is to the left of the most progressive Democratic presidential candidate this year. Mr. Rosenfeld has been talking to the perps and functionaries of a voter fraud scheme that kept the likes of Martin Frost in office for years. It is a scheme that is run by the good old boys of the Texas Democratic Party, and it is voter fraud.

I am also a researcher in the area of voter fraud who has published papers that are referenced by NIST in connection with election auditing. I was a member of the campaign staff of a candidate for Tarrant County Democratic Party Chair in 2006. The incumbent Party County Chair and his coterie of elected cronies did not take kindly to my candidate’s announcement of her candidacy. One of them, a Texas State representative from a Tarrant County district known for using mail ballot fraud to clinch elections dating from the days of Martin Frost, made a speech to the assembled county precinct chairs that would have gotten him fired if he’d been in the private sector. He told the audience that the audacious candidate was just a woman with no experience who ought to stay at home and be a housewife (or words to that effect). He was roundly booed for his extreme male chauvinism, but it was only the beginning of a dirty dishonest campaign in which she lost by a small margin that was discovered by the candidate and her staff to have been the result of mail ballot fraud. Ms. Gloria Meeks was one of several paid workers who participated in the scheme that resulted in the defeat of the challenger for the County Chair office.

The Democratic voters in the JP district in which Ms. Meeks was working vote in a block. They are told how to vote by their clergymen and precinct chairs. In Texas any voter over 65 is eligible to vote by mail. Anyone who "helps" a voter vote by mail must be identified on the ballot, and if you help one person or two people living in the same household, you cannot, by law,"help" anybody else. In this particular JP district there is a cottage industry wherein vote harvesting services are sold to various candidates for $2 per vote. There are about 7-8 ladies who visit old people, mostly in retirement homes, helping them apply for a mail ballot and then helping them fill it out after it arrives in the mail. The fact that these “helpers” “helped” hundreds of elderly voters and did not identify themselves as prescribed by law is evidence of knowledge of guilt. Their handwriting tripped them up.

In the 2006 election the voter harvesting operation was uncovered when the losing candidate demanded her right to examine the mail ballots at Tarrant County election headquarters. The ballots in her race were discovered to be massively fraudulent. Someone reported the situation to the Attorney General, and he had the Texas Rangers come and interview the women who had harvested all these votes. They also impounded the evidence, consisting of thousands of fraudulent mail ballots. To this day those ballots are in the custody of the Attorney General as far as I know and this case has never been brought to court. Ms. Meeks, with the help of the Democratic Party County Chair (incumbent and announced winner), cried racial prejudice, made absurd accusations against the Texas Rangers, and threatened legal retaliation against the Attorney General. The entire matter was dropped by all parties.

I do not approve of any scheme to defraud an election, be it through retail fraud involving electronic voting or old fashioned schemes like this one. I would hope that Mr. Rosenfeld is similarly motivated. But I would suggest to all that this is a real and present danger to fair elections in Texas and not a part of the Republican scheme to disenfranchise Democratic voters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Catch-22 Posted by: KeepsonTickn
» RE: Catch-22 Posted by: navy-vet
» RE: Catch-22 Posted by: lobdillj
election of 2000, I meant to say...
Posted by: lenioui on Mar 31, 2008 4:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Shenanigans
Posted by: ptoddchesser on Apr 1, 2008 8:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am constantly reading article after article detailing obviously shady practices by someone in authority who inevitably ends up being republican.
Karl Rove comes up in the Gov. Siegalman matter in Alabama along with several Republican prosecutors. This article details what is happening in Texas and though I will not name more, the list goes on and on.
At what point does someone with authority and the obvious scruples and ethics to do something, do something?
I work in a pretty blue collar enviroment and hear all the time how great a country the U.S. is. Fact is, the older I get and less naive I get, the less I see it. Blatant injustice is not a new thing in this country. I know that. I just never thought I would see a day in this country when those propogating those injustices would wear them on their sleeve so proudly.
I know we are in a time in this country where change is so badly needed. I just don't see how or where it will come from. The last seven years has established the status quo and the status quo has embedded itself firmly in the fabric of this nation.
......................
Just a side note.....
Would you expect anything less from a state that so proudly delivered upon us the illustrious George W. Bush?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]