Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Record Turnout Expected in Ohio Primary

By Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet. Posted March 4, 2008.


Despite bad weather, early voting suggests numbers will be at general election levels.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Turnout in Ohio's 2008 primary on Tuesday, March 4, is almost certain to set a record and could approach what is normally seen in a fall general election, according to a spokesman for the Franklin County Board of Elections.

By early evening Monday, the number of early voters in Franklin County, Ohio, where Columbus, the state capital, is located, included 80,000 absentee ballots and nearly 5,000 people who came to the board of election office in Columbus to cast ballots, said Ben Piscatelli, spokesman for the Franklin County BOE.

In the November 2006 election, the county had 93,000 absentee ballots.

"It is approaching that," he said. "It is like a general election."

Despite predictions of bad weather for primary day, supporters of both Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., and Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., appeared determined to vote for their presidential candidate. At the BOE office in downtown Columbus, volunteers handing out literature for both candidates said they did not see many people leaving despite two-hour waits to vote on Friday. Apparently there were longer waits this past Saturday, prompting the BOE to extend early voting hours until 9 p.m. on Monday.

"The line is getting congested, but the majority of people are staying," said Ron Dye Brown, an Obama volunteer from Columbus. "There are some people who are getting frustrated. But they are staying. They are serious about this. This is going down in history."

"There are polls that show Hillary is slightly ahead," said Joshua Stevens, a Clinton volunteer from Columbus, "but polls mean nothing unless people get out and vote. I'll be doing Hillary rides to the polls tomorrow, helping people to vote."

The campaign volunteers, which included former New York City firemen supporting Clinton, said people knew the primary vote could determine the next Democratic nominee. Voters interviewed in line echoed that sentiment.

While polls suggested the Obama was ahead in Texas, the other large state voting on Tuesday, Clinton's lead in Ohio has been shrinking in recent weeks and days. Several people who voted early said they remember the frustrations of the 2004 presidential election, where long lines disenfranchised many Democratic voters. They were determined their vote would count this time around.

The early turnout in Franklin County was mirrored in other Ohio counties, election officials said.

Franklin County election officials and Ohio's Democratic secretary of state, Jennifer Brunner, also were determined not to repeat mistakes from the past, BOE spokesman Piscatelli said. The county has 780,000 voters and uses paperless voting machines, but people can ask to use a paper ballot, he said, referring to a new option created by Brunner. Franklin County ordered 110,000 paper ballots, he said. One percent of the public had specifically requested paper ballots in early voting, he said.

On the other hand, Ohio's Republican-controlled legislature passed a new voter I.D. law since the 2004 presidential election, requiring voters to present one of several forms of identification to vote. That requirement, coupled with new consolidated precinct locations and electronic voting machines that prompt people to review every item -- instead of selecting a straight party vote -- are likely to create some bottlenecks at the polls, one lawyer volunteering for the Obama campaign said.

That lawyer, who came from out-of-state to watch for voting rights abuses but did not want to give his name -- because the Obama campaign was very strict about telling volunteers not to speak to the press -- said his campaign did not appear to be well-organized if serious delays or election protection problems surfaced on Tuesday.

In contrast, in South Carolina, for instance, the Obama campaign gave voters small cards telling them how to expeditiously use the paperless, touch-screen voting machines. When that suggestion was made to Ohio campaign officials, he said the Ohio campaign replied it would not be printing similar cards for voters. Instead, the campaign would be relying on door hangings that reminded voters what ID to bring and their precinct location.

On the other hand, other Obama volunteers said they were ready for Tuesday, saying they even had plastic ponchos to give to people who might get caught in the rain while waiting in line. The campaign was giving out cups of coffee at the Franklin County BOE on Friday.

Clinton's volunteers, for their part, also said they were ready for Tuesday. "I believe our campaign is more organized than the Obama campaign," Joshua Stevens said. "A lot of the people at our headquarters are from New York, California and Washington, D.C. We've had people doing phone banking, canvassing, all kinds of stuff today."

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: obama, ohio, democratic primary

Steven Rosenfeld is a senior fellow at Alternet.org and co-author of "What Happened in Ohio: A Documentary Record of Theft and Fraud in the 2004 Election," with Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman (The New Press, 2006).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Politics! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Republican who voted for Obama!
Posted by: candlebabe on Mar 4, 2008 6:29 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I ran to the polls this morning to vote for Obama. I am actually a female registered republican. I just cannot imagine what it would be like listening to Hillary whine for 4 years in the white house. I would like to see her whining stop today when she drops out of this race! Go Obama! Ohio loves you!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Zieg Heil! Posted by: xbj
OBamacrat
Posted by: ImSwiss on Mar 4, 2008 6:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The lies and innuendo and spin have been coming on fast against Obama. These are the last desperate tools of a political machine. America needs a stateman. The relentless press and the lies cost us Gore and Kerry, we can't let them take another great man from Americas future. American needs greatness not triangulation and spin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not sure who to vote for.....
Posted by: sallythewally on Mar 4, 2008 8:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Guess it will come down to me and my paper ballot. As one of my friends says, I don't want either one to lose, I want them both to be prominent in the next administration. And given where the media (including the mainstream media) are starting to go on Obama, I think he may need Hillary's experience to help deal with the sliming to come, if his under the radar, subtle, even passive-aggressive form of response to attack, and form of attack, doesn't work. It may work, though; the Republican slime machine isn't used to this sort of underhanded form of response/attack. Good psychological approach by Obama, it helps him seem pure while undermining the opponent cleverly. Just depends on how the media goes with its other most-loved candidate, McCain. Obama will have to undercut that longer-term adoration by the MSM.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

johncp
Posted by: johnp on Mar 4, 2008 5:33 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How pathetic. Obamagoons, are having to change their tune, haveing heard the tiniest bad news about their "inspiring" candidate. Now that Hillary has a chance of winning in Ohio and Texas, these Obama supporters are screaming that she has to reach a "double-digit" win if she's to survive. Last week she was going to lose, and that was the end of it. What a bunch of losers and weakinglings you are. Instead of ackowledging that your opponent has shown the courage and stamina to win back enough support to endanger your Obama wins, you pretend that Hillary must now raise the bar. Instead of winning, now she has to win by double digits. You people make me sick.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bitter, bitter, Hillary
Posted by: DreamFast on Mar 4, 2008 11:36 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"What a bunch of losers and weakinglings you are. Instead of ackowledging that your opponent has shown the courage and stamina to win back enough support to endanger your Obama wins, you pretend that Hillary must now raise the bar."

That's rich.

It isn't courage fom Hillary Rovian Clinton - it's pure desparation.

It could be stamina, but it source reeks of ego.

And raising the bar is the only direction it will go now that she's lowered it so many times it's touching the ground.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Paperless ballots?
Posted by: Zer7 on Mar 4, 2008 5:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Franklin County ballots... They didn't look paperless to me. There was a ticker tape that scrolled while you selected your choices on the machine, visible through a clear window. The machine had a graphical interface, of course. Not a bad set of choices, IMO.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement