Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The Obstacles to Real Health-Care Reform

By Mark Schmitt, The American Prospect. Posted October 31, 2009.


How a series of roadblocks and compromises shaped the health-care debate -- and why the battle doesn't end when Obama signs a bill.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

American presidents have tried seven times to bring us into the community of nations that provide health care to all citizens. Seven times the effort failed. More accurately, it was blocked. In the 1940s, the anti-reform movement was led by doctors, through the American Medical Association. In the 1990s, it was led by the insurance and small-business lobbies.

This time everything has been different. The town hall meetings and right-wing distortions of this summer drew attention away from a far more significant fact: Most of the traditional enemies of reform have been quiet, absent, or divided. Many -- including the conservative American Medical Association -- are almost supportive of reform. Large and small businesses understand that reducing their health-care costs and making them predictable will be good for their bottom line, and the chief lobbyist for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Bruce Josten, has said, "The reality with the business community is that we want reform." Even the National Federation of Independent Business, which took the lead in opposing reform in the Clinton years, now participates in some pro-reform coalitions. And while insurance companies have much to lose from legislation that includes a public option and tight regulations, many large insurers know that they can survive and thrive when every American purchases insurance.

Still, new obstacles emerged to take their place. Some, like the traditional opponents, fought the legislative battle, using public fear and political manipulation to try to stop the bill from passing or to influence it so it fails to achieve the goal of universal coverage. Other obstacles will not fully emerge until a health-reform bill becomes law. The bill that is coming together as of this writing is a product of delicate and complex maneuvering around not only the outright opponents of reform but also around the fallout from choices made earlier in the game by supporters of reform. The course taken around those obstacles will define the legislation and its ultimate direction. Will it lead to universal coverage? Will it reduce costs and bring insurance companies under control? Or will it do too little and create the wrong incentives? Worst of all, will it lead to a public backlash, like the one that led to the abrupt repeal of catastrophic care for seniors in 1989?

Those questions won't be answered on the day that President Barack Obama signs a bill. His signing ceremony will be just one momentous step along the road to universal coverage. The forces that seek to undercut the promise of reform will still have plenty of room to maneuver. And the choices made by reformers will still define the path of what's possible, for better or worse.

Unhinged Republicans

Before the 1994 health-care battle, William Kristol wrote a legendary memo advising Republicans to block everything that had to do with reform -- but not everyone stayed on message. Moderate Republicans participated in the process because they did not want to be seen as obstructing a popular reform, and a bipartisan group of senators came surprisingly close to agreeing on a bill.

In the current episode, however, Republican legislators have been almost unanimous in taking Kristol's advice. Claims from critics like the long-discredited Betsy McCaughey that the legislation would create "death panels" moved smoothly into the GOP bloodstream and became arguments not just to delete the elusive offending provision but to kill the entire bill. Even the small-business and insurance lobbyists have been more cooperative than the party they bankroll. The result of opting out of the legislative process is that Republicans have sacrificed the opportunity to craft the bill, and if they fail to block it, they have one option: Incite a backlash.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: health, barack obama, healthcare reform

Mark Schmitt is the executive editor of The American Prospect.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Politics! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
America is sinking
Posted by: itsallbs on Oct 31, 2009 1:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and the right-wing of both parties is digging the hole.

To borrow a line from the movie The American President,these people claim to love America, but clearly hate Americans.

The Fox News hate mongers and right-wing idiots like Michelle Bachmann, John Bonehead(sic), Mitch McConnell,Chuck Grassley(astroturf), etc. clearly are afraid of having to survive on the money we the people pay them.

The out and out bribes they take from the healthcare industry, big pharma, big oil, wall street, etc. makes it impossible for us to get real reform.

Remember, they are supposed to work for our best interests, not theirs. They lie, cheat and steal their way into office and then convince their constituents that the sun rises in the west and the earth is flat. How else would they be able to convince people to shout things like keep the government hands off my medicare.

They have hypnotized their constituents to vote against their best interests knowing that their campaign coffers will overflow and their wallets will get fatter from the special interests they serve.

I personally believe they should all be prosecuted and impeached or recalled, whichever is appropriate.

Wake up and smell the bullshit people. It's time quit letting them feed you shit and then convincing you it's candy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

medical insurance
Posted by: spruillhand on Oct 31, 2009 2:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You can get instant medical insurance at the lowest price from http://bit.ly/39pFJx

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Please
Posted by: Nightowl on Oct 31, 2009 4:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Find a way, Afternet, to keep these people from posting their ads. It's totally annoying and I plan to stop reading the comments until you do something about it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Please Posted by: Iraan Ozonjo
TWO HUGE OBSTACLES REMAIN
Posted by: drricklippin on Oct 31, 2009 5:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
- recognizing that ONLY approx 10% of human health outcomes relate to the medical enterprise. So WE all have been both duped and swindled

- American's immature fear of and denial of death. Actually believing medical technology can beat it.

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The first and only obstacle was purposely keeping single payer out of discussion.
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Oct 31, 2009 7:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The rest was just playing politics and giving Big Insurance/Pharma their victories. There was nothing to "compromise" but once again the pols made a big thing out of nothing. People can give me stupid talk such as "Obama can't make laws and it's not his job to bully Congress". Give me a break ! Obama did a hell of a job bullying Congress to bailout Wall $treet and approve one war/military spending bill after another. In fact, he actually moved to the right of Dubya. Obama purposely chose to screw up like most Democrats and then find it convenient to blame someone else and the GOP is having plenty of field days about it. It's no different from the days Dubya and Frist were doing their bullying and then blaming the Democrats for being obstructionists. Both parties are obstructing real health care reform and there are very few Democrats let alone any Republicans in Washington who support true health care reform. Well, this is what you get for putting "winning" before choosing quality driven progressives to lead !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why are Republicans against single payer?
Posted by: mixers on Oct 31, 2009 1:26 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Republicans are all about saving money, why then, are they not for "Universal Health Care"?
The savings would be enormous.
I believe the health insurance industry make a net profit of over $300 BILLION a year. The cost of medical coverage on Auto Insurance would no longer apply. I myself would save over $90.00 a month on Auto Insurance. Workers Compensation Insurance would no longer need Medical coverage, another huge savings for the Corporations in the USA. The amount saved would be huge.

The GOP are looking for "Tort Reform". If we had U.H.C. there would be no need for Tort Reform. The medical part in the Compensations awarded would no longer exist, so lower amounts of Dollars awarded, lower premiums for Doctor's liability Insurance, so win! win! all around.

1)Saving $300,000,000,000 a year, and that's just the profit the Insurance Companies make. (Think of the Premiums that are paid).

2)Saving medical portion on the auto insurance,
that's a lot of savings for individuals.

3) The medical part of workers compensation insurance would be saved, allowing our industries to compete in the world markets again.
(Again massive savings).

4)Medical portion in the compensation awards no longer apply. (Massive Savings).

5) No more admin. staff processing claim forms for insurance companies. (Unbelievable savings).

With the savings spelled out above, Why are the Republicans not for "Universal Health Care"?

THAT IS THE QUESTION.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Slow learners or what?
Posted by: sherry on Oct 31, 2009 1:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reform may be difficult, but other countries manage. I can't quite identify what went wrong here, why we are so easily misled into acting against our own best interest. I certainly hope it's not contagious; I would hate to see the self-destruction spread to other countries.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stop blaming Republicans- the Democrats are the obstacle
Posted by: tomkara on Oct 31, 2009 4:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When you elect Republicans at least you know what you're getting. The Democrats - for the most part - have turned out to be liars and two-faced on this and many other issues. Obama hasn't pushed for a real public option, much less single payer. We already know the White has said one thing publicly and worked against the public option behind the scenes (listen to Democracy Now! and you'll hear the real story). We know that Baucus and others are simply handmaidens for the insurance industry. Wake up - stop supporting the "centrist" Democrats and either take over the party like the right wing did with the Republican party, or work toward an alternative third party. The Democrats disgust me, and I've let them know I won't be sending money or voting for them next time - I suggest everyone who feels the same way let them know it too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) Not Hip either as obstacle or key player
Posted by: Newstime on Nov 1, 2009 12:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Private health-insurance execs, before resumption of health-reform efforts, were content to collect their multi-million-dollar compensation packages and their companies mounted no serious effort to tap the huge market of uninsured Americans through affordable monthly premiums and non-discriminatory coverage policies.

Suddenly, those execs and their companies are no longer considered obstacles to health-coverage expansion, they are considered key players and demand that American voters consider their financial interests in any reform solution. Well-l-l, even a hospital-based program, similar to Kaiser Health or preferably utilizing non-profit hospitals, would be better, it would cut out the middle men and it would control health-care cost inflation.

The article is undoubtedly correct in asserting that the battle will not end with the stroke of Mr. Obama's pen, especially if private health-insurance companies have undue influence over the legislative outcome. Case in point? Whether Congress imposes an eventual mandate of $950 per person(ignoring Medicare payroll tax, income tax and actual hidden tax collections for health-benefits programs) or starts with the so-called "nibble" of $200 per uninsured adult, Robert Zirkelbach of America's Health Insurance Plans is worried that such a "small fine," together with the low-income threshold for exemption, would "make it more likely that people are going to stay outside the health care system."

What other "statesman-like concerns" do the include-me-now private health insurers express? This writer evaluated them in this E-mail directed to Mr. Zirkelbach earlier:

"Treating as a given the goal of your organization's plan, preventing the "crowd-out" of private insurance, what do you propose doing if those uninsured taxpayers your organization wants to cover only "in stages" and "in a fiscally responsible way" insist to their members of Congress that they be allowed to keep all tax payments they make so that others have health coverage(federal civil-service employees, veterans, the U.S. prison-inmate population, undocumented aliens who are detained, state civil-service employees, and school-district and other municipal-level employees), while uninsured taxpayers go without equal health protection?

"Where, in your organization's plan, is there a word about the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment Constitutional rights of these 44-47 million uninsured Americans and their families? Since they are taxed to pay for health protection for others--through Medicare payroll-tax withholding, federal and state income taxes, sales taxes, and, some, property taxes--the Fourteenth Amendment equal-protection clause entitles them to receive the same health protection. Under the Fifth Amendment public-purpose doctrine, too, tax funds must be used for a public purpose, not to hopefully phase in large blocs of people eventually.

"Regarding the federal government performance-grant program AHIP also proposes, how does your organization contemplate adjusting if, considering the current budgetary realities in California and other states, the states move to sue the federal government, instead, charging that its under-funding of Medicare and Medicaid forces them to bear the financial burden of all the other previously-mentioned health-care programs at the state level? The states could very well decide that they should not approach Washington with hat in hand at all--that the federal government should stop shifting its financial burdens to the hard-pressed states."

By Charles H. Savage/Editorial Columnist
Continental Features/
Continental News Service, Inc.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

To borrow
Posted by: nikefilson on Nov 16, 2009 10:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To borrow a line from the movie The American President,these people claim to love America, but clearly hate Americans.

The Fox News hate mongers and right-wing idiots like Michelle Bachmann, John Bonehead(sic), Mitch молокососы (skins) обои к сериалу постеры постеры к сериалам buffy the vampire slayer обои к сериалу баффи - истребительница вампиров обои к сериалу seropol5 McConnell,Chuck Grassley(astroturf), etc. clearly are afraid of having to survive on the money we the people pay them.

The out and out bribes they take from the healthcare industry, big pharma, big oil, wall street, etc. makes it impossible for us to get real reform.

Remember, they are supposed to work for our best interests, not theirs. They lie, cheat and steal their way into posters movie posters free субтитры к фильмам субтитры к кино схватка (damages) обои к сериалу seropol5 office and then convince their constituents that the sun rises in the west and the earth is flat. How else would they be able to convince people to shout things like keep the government hands off my medicare.

They have hypnotized their constituents to vote against their best interests knowing that their campaign coffers will overflow and their wallets will get fatter from the special interests they serve.

I personally believe they should all be prosecuted and impeached or recalled, whichever is appropriate.

Wake up and smell the bullshit people. It's time quit letting them feed турнир по казакам казаки american dad! tv show wallpapers movie wallpapers film wallpapers seropol5 you shit and then convincing you it's candy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement