Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Big Business's Hidden Hand in the Smear Job on Van Jones

By Adele M. Stan, AlterNet. Posted September 8, 2009.


How Americans for Prosperity, the astroturf group that organized town-hall thuggery, teamed up with Fox News to force out Van Jones.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

If you thought the targeting of Van Jones for vilification by the right was about his race, his youthful flirtation with socialism, or a petition he signed about the 9/11 attacks, you'd only be a little bit right.

And if you think it was about the Color of Change campaign against Glenn Beck's show on Fox News Channel, you'd really miss the mark.

The racism and red-baiting suffered by Jones at the hands of Beck and his admirers are simply key elements in a marketing strategy designed to serve Very Big Business -- the oil and other business interests that support the astroturfing group Americans for Prosperity.

The strategy is simple: Prey upon the worst fears of the right-wing folks who live next door in order to get them to organize against their own interests.

When word of Jones' resignation from his White House post hit the airwaves, Americans for Prosperity's Phil Kerpen, the group's policy director, wasted no time in taking personal credit.

In his column on FoxNews.com, Kerpen wrote, "The Van Jones affair … is one of the most significant things I've ever had the honor of being involved in."

Progressives first became familiar with Americans for Prosperity because of its role, along with Beck's 9-12 Project, in organizing the disruption of town hall meetings across the country at which members of Congress were scheduled to discuss pending health care reform legislation with their constituents.

Many assumed the AFP astroturfers, who are not required to disclose their funding sources, were aligned specifically with health care interests -- and indeed they may be aligned with some. Look a little closer, though, and you'll find at the top of their agenda the derailment of energy reform, especially the cap-and-trade formula for reducing greenhouse-gas emissions.

Naming defeat of clean-energy legislation his "No. 1 legislative priority," Kerpen, in his Fox column, details his role in demonizing Jones in the right-wing echo chamber from which Jones, as an Obama aide, could not escape.

By his own account, Kerpen's quest to fell Jones began on July 9 -- weeks before Color of Change began to organize against Beck -- when he was asked to appear on Fox & Friends to explain "what green jobs are"; and to discuss Obama's green-jobs "czar," Jones.

A little research revealed Jones' involvement, early in his activist career, with a group that embraced socialist values. From there, Kerpen extrapolated, "the 'green jobs' concept was merely a new face on the old ideology of central economic planning and control, an alternative and a threat to free-market capitalism."

The month before, Kerpen explains, he and Beck had dubbed the cap-and-trade energy reform legislation embraced by the Obama as "a watermelon" -- "green on the outside but Communist red to the core." (No racist intent in that characterization, of course.)

Cap-and-trade is a mechanism through which industrial plants are given permits to produce X-amount of pollution. After they've used up their allotment, they can only pollute more by buying the unused permits of other permit-holders. This creates incentives for certain businesses to limit their greenhouse-gas emissions for the monetary payoff of selling their permits.

In Kerpen's Aug. 28 appearance on Beck's show, he broadened his attack to include the Apollo Alliance, on whose board Jones once sat. The Apollo Alliance seeks to build public-private partnerships on green jobs, working with business, labor unions, government officials and activists.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: glenn beck, rupert murdoch, barack obama, van jones, americans for prosperity, cap-and-trade, grassfire, resisnet, mike pence

Adele M. Stan AlterNet's Washington bureau chief.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Politics! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Obama is a friend of big business so he will allow big business to fire Jones but defend Geithner.
Posted by: LaughingModerateIndependent on Sep 8, 2009 12:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He capitulates to the right wing because he is obviously made in the cloth cut from "The Chicago School."

Today's organized crime in politics sends its sons (and a few daughters) to private schools to get the kind of training that does organized crime proud. And that level of nefarious corruption reflects in most policies signed, sealed, and delivered from the Oval Office.

Obama appointed people who were in on past policies, or implemented recent ones that align entirely with the Bush neocon agenda. He does not represent OTHER than that, but benefits from the ILLUSION that he has higher ideals, and were it not for the power of the right wing echo chamber, imagine what the man could get done. Bah, humbug!

Obama may not have been a cheerleader like Bush but he sure is lookin' more like it ! What corporation has Obama not bowed down before? Big Pharma/insurance, MIC, banker-hustlers?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Bitches Protesteth Too Much
Posted by: RevolutionNet on Sep 8, 2009 1:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is the GOP getting so disproportionately upset that one man has examined Socialism and might believe that George W. Bush had advance knowledge of the 9/11 attacks?

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm?

FREE AMERICA

REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lobbyists for Wall Street & Saudi & Venezuelan & Canadian & Mexican & Nigerian Prosperity
Posted by: gunboat diplomat on Sep 8, 2009 4:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Might be a better name for them. Until the American people wake up and recognize who the real enemies of their future are, they will be incapable of taking action to remedy their problems.

It's called addiction to foreign energy supplies that are certain to run out (long-term) or be cut off (short-term). A handful of politically connected jackals have gotten very rich off this dependency, however, just as heroin dealers do. They don't want to see all their customers leave any more than the heroin dealer does - but unlike the heroin dealer, they have major media conglomerates (FauxNews & the Murdoch Familiy Trust, 5-10% owned by the Saudis) on their side.

It is also the American people who have allowed themselves to be put in a position of energy dependency, although the situation was partially engineered by the House of Bush and the House of Saud from the early 1970s onwards. Carter's weak and abortive effort at creating a domestic renewable energy program was never supported by Congress, and Reagan canceled it immediately and converted Carter's DOE into a nuclear weapons-oriented institution, which it remains to this day.

So, was it the American public or was it the oily Saudis? Laying blame is all very well, but how do you fix the problem - the problem being that the federal government is still largely in the hands of international and domestic energy cartels, finance cartels, health insurance cartels, military-industrial cartels, etc? These groups include all the above nation's corrupt leaders - Chavez is no different; his socialist programs are paid for with U.S. dollars, and he doesn't want to see a price collapse any more than the Saudis do.

You see, the real threat Van Jones-type programs pose is to the price of oil. If we all drive solar-powered electric cars and use wind, tidal and geothermal energy (or nuclear, whatever), then we stop importing oil, and oil demand plummets to the floor. All of a sudden, Canadian tar sands are worth less than it costs to develop them - and all the billionaire investors loose their shirts. Horrors, right?

Take a Van Jones-type "green jobs" program in California for manufacturing electric cars and solar panels - we certainly have the technology.

Give the industry protection from international competition by raising trade barriers - yup, tariffs on imported electric cars and solar panels - but, to be fair, even higher tariffs on energy imports (coal, oil and gas) should be implemented.

This causes Chicago-trained economists to scream in terror - because it takes the mantle of power on energy decisions away from the billionaires who are their primary sponsors, and puts it in the hands of the states.

Unfortunately, Chicago-trained economists are the ones that set policy under both Republican and Democratic Administrations. Thus, the federal government's power might need to be limited as a method of breaking the grip of fossil-fuel corporations over the democratic process.

They can't come out and talk about this directly, because poll after poll shows that a vast majority of the U.S. public support energy independence and renewable expansion - 75% is typical.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

revenge
Posted by: BobPomeroy on Sep 8, 2009 5:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
they got Jones, now lets get Limpaw or Beck. It's what they respect, and totally fitting to hoist them on their own petard, as they say

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What is really disturbing
Posted by: progressive-life on Sep 8, 2009 5:24 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is that Obama had to have known about Jones views and comments and hired him on anyway. That says that Obama and his wife feel the same way. He used this Czar BS to bring radicals into the whitehouse.

Now Obama figures that Jones will just do his bidding outside the whitehouse and no one will notice.

It seems Beck and Fox are the only ones willing to put a spot light on Obama.

I can see it now..Obama OUT in 4 years and riots and calls of racism everywhere.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Radicals? Posted by: desertrose
» RE: adicals? Posted by: progressive-life
» nonsense statement Posted by: ReallyBearish
» RE: nonsense statement Posted by: progressive-life
» RE: What is really disturbing Posted by: johnthetreehugger
» RE: What is really disturbing Posted by: progressive-life
» RE: What is really disturbing Posted by: Squarehead
As I have said before
Posted by: marletat on Sep 8, 2009 6:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is amazing the right wingers worship two drug addicts and follow them with baited breath and can't wait to find out what their next plan of action will be. Its not possible that these two clowns lie. They are in it for the money. Limbaugh makes 25 million a year and loves it when you freakin blind idiots idolize them. More money in the pocket. There is no down turn in their lives nor are they worried about health care. Limbaugh has a kockler implant (went deaf from Oxycontin addiction) which cost LOTS OF MONEY. No problem with his health plan.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» cochlear implant: >=$40.000 Posted by: counterpoint
Here's my prescription to stop this sort of thing
Posted by: ETSpoon on Sep 8, 2009 6:25 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, an amendment to the US Constitution overturning the 1886 Supreme Court ruling in Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad which defined corporations as persons under the intent clause of section 1 of the 14th Amendment. However the entire issue of corporate personhood rests solely on a statement made by Chief Justice Morrison R. Waite before opening arguments in the case:"The court does not wish to hear argument on the question whether the provision in the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which forbids a State to deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws, applies to these corporations. We are all of opinion that it does."

The court reporter entered his interpretation of Waite's statement into the summery "The defendant Corporations are persons within the intent of the clause in section 1 of the Fourteen Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which forbids a State to deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

The actual ruling of the case says nothing about corporate personhood, only the summery. But since then generations of sleazy corporate
lawyers and lazy and corrupt judges have upheld this, on its face, ridiculous concept as accepted legal practice. Yet right now:"Reynolds American Inc., Lorillard Inc. and several other tobacco companies filed a lawsuit Monday seeking to block various provisions of a new federal tobacco law on the grounds that the provisions violate the companies' First Amendment rights.

"The tobacco companies said the recently enacted law, which placed the industry under the oversight of the Food and Drug Administration, sharply restricts the companies' right to advertise their products to adult tobacco users."

Wall Street Journal, Sept. 2, 09

For the sake of brevity I move on.

Secondly this country needs an amendment for the public financing of all elections from the presidency on down.

Third, and this will be the hardest, a legal precedent defining a clear difference between Constitutionally protected "political" speech and "commercial" speech, see above.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Here's what Article 5 says: Posted by: ETSpoon
There will be blood
Posted by: Hiroak on Sep 8, 2009 6:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All we need is a very brave, totally dedicated, somewhat fed up individual i.e. John Brown of Harpers Ferry fame to light the match, to use one civil war analogy .

This country is a powder keg.

You have on one hand the in your face, stupid, idealistic, patriotic, ignorants, who rail that the status quo is ordained by God. This would be the slavery is ordained by God and is our right guys in 1859.

Then you have people who think and can see beyond what we are to what we could be and who, while appreciating the power of money, don't make mammon their god. They also understand that the bible is a metaphorical tome full of allegory, irony, and symbolism and is not a legal, scientific, or sociologicl study meant to be taken at face value. This would be the people who thought slavery was unjust, ungodly, and evil in 1859.

All we need is for someone in the latter group to confront the unbalanced yahoos in the first and it will be on, and maybe the end result will be an end to capitalism and the rise of democracy an a golden age of science, literature, medicine, engineering, and peace.

The removal of the "God" people from positions of power is a must. The CONTITUTIONAL demand that there be no religious testing must be upheld.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Side issue: Censoring challenges to official 9/11 story
Posted by: Alan8 on Sep 8, 2009 6:55 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The demonization of Van Jones in part because he suggested 9/11 was an inside job is CENSORSHIP!

In reality, as Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (www.AE911Truth.org) have shown, the official 9/11 story, as asserted by Dick Cheney and the 9/11 Commission) blatantly contradicts the facts.

The evidence, from the way the buildings exploded, to the presence of thermite residues in the debris, all points to CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS.

Even if it didn't, the First Amendment gives people the right to voice their opinions, and gives Van Jones the right to assert the neocons staged the 9/11 attacks to permit their fascist agenda.

This CENSORSHIP of any challenge to the Dick Cheney version of 9/11 is designed to have a chilling effect on the discussion of this important issue.

For a quick overview of the evidence for controlled demolitions, see the right panel at the site, www.AE911Truth.org.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It should not be forgotten who else they teamed up with:
Posted by: leafsong1 on Sep 8, 2009 7:19 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rahm Emmanuel and Barack Obama. The pro-big business elements that Jones was fighting against in the Obama Administration needed an excuse to force him out. Along comes pro-big business Fox News to the rescue. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that Beck's offensive was prompted by a call from the White House to one of his bosses. When Obama's guys fight againswt the right instead of cooperating with them, then we can start to imagine that therre is a line dividing them. Right now, they seem to be very much on the same team.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nothing changed in 08.
Posted by: troubleinmind254 on Sep 8, 2009 7:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All this talk about a mandate with the Obama elections, this dreams of a New Deal 2.0. It was a false hop., The left expected too much from this administration and the far-right noise machine is humming along.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Nothing changed in 08. Posted by: ChicagoWay
For those of you who can read and comprehend
Posted by: marletat on Sep 8, 2009 8:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
check out "The Family the secret fundamentalism at the heart of American Power" by Jeff Sharlet. You will have so many emotions but the strongest will be fear. If nothing else look up the Family and what it is all about. It was co-founded by Erik Prince's (of the famed Blackwater), dad . While I am recommending reading material also read BLACKWATER. That one will also make you shake in you shoes. The Family has long tentacles into things you probably never dreamed of. Some deeply involved Gov Sanford, Ensign, Vitter, Coburn and many many more. George Bush not that into it! They admire Hitler, Stalin, Mao, the Mafia because of the one man leadership. They claim to be religious but as I see it it is fake. Their goal is to take over the world and the Republicans in the Congress are trying to KILL democracy to their ends. As I re-read this I look like a crazy person but I assure you I am not. See what others have to say about the Family before you write me off as a nut.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not really preying on their fears
Posted by: sherry on Sep 8, 2009 9:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just for the record, at the four town hall meetings I've attended there's lots of shouting and swearing about cap and trade. The messengers don't understand the message, but they're ready to recite the text.

I'm not sure these groups prey on people's fear so much as manufacture those fears. They have the same fears we all do --- can I keep my job, can I find a job, what if I get sick and lose my job, what if I get sick and lose my insurance, and on and on. Realizing that those fears could lead the masses to acts of compassion and common sense and, no doubt, maybe something with a socialist tinge, these groups try to replace those real, personal fears with intagible, group fears. Stuff the town-hall-attendees don't really understand but pretend to know all about. To tell the truth, I find grown men afraid of windmills about as silly as it gets, but I've witnessed the terror in their voices and faces when they rant about wind energy at town hall meetings.

I'm afraid the Van Jones fallout has already started with Joseph Kennedy declining a chance to run for his uncle's Senate seat. He must know he'll be tarred and feathered fast and furiously for his association with Hugo Chavez.
Kennedy's good deeds and pragmatic approaches to real problems would not go unpunished.

We could end up with governments on local, state, and national levels with no progressive voices whatsoever. We have to follow Van Jones's advice and "get uppity" ourselves, refusing to give in to the attacks. The tipping point theory has to kick in soon ---- enough is enough.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Czars must go
Posted by: C. Rich on Sep 8, 2009 9:23 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jones should have never been there. Here is a hard hitting piece:

http://americaspeaksink.com/?s=obama+boring

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Artificially manipulated energy prices vs. green jobs...
Posted by: gunboat diplomat on Sep 8, 2009 9:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Saudi Arabian Oil Minister Says Prices Are 'Good for Everybody'", Sep 8 2009,Bloomberg.

Who wants Van Jones out? Who wants U.S. oil demand stimulated, and domestic renewable energy sabotaged?

Who are the Republicans really working for?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Trickle Down Party....
Posted by: barefeet on Sep 8, 2009 9:35 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
....just doin' its thang.

But not to worry folks, and we are powerless against them and the comedy of electing a "progressive" chief executive has NO chance of changing anything.

If he was any real threat to them they would just blow his brains out on TV like they did to JFK and tell us that them damn Muslims did it so we should just nuke Iran. And, My Fellow Amurcans, we would believe it - and DO it.

Just sit back and watch the new version of fourth of July fireworks, the disintegration of America after generations of our mad-mad pursuit of war as a business as directed by our moneyed elite - and our total damn the torpedoes attitude of ignoring the resultant balance of payments ticking time bomb.

Too late to do anything about it now, and the Trickle Down Party wouldn't let us anyway.

But hey!! How about them Dodgers!!??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Grassfire?
Posted by: badkitty on Sep 8, 2009 10:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, Bernadine and Bill, how about bringing out Prairie Fire again? I am angry about Van Jones, but he is a great inspirational speaker, maybe he'll come back to the Bay Area where he is mainstream, not left or right, and help us create a better place for the future. I'm sure he and Obama actually had a lot to say to each other, when they met, since Van is a community organizer par excellence. Van Jones is emblematic of any future we might have, and the right is busy digging its grave.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How about...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Sep 8, 2009 11:02 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.. Alternet's role in his firing. After all... they were another media outlet lambasting anyone who dared question the official story of 9-11 just like everyone else.

I don't subscribe to any particular scenario of what went on that day or why... but I am at least willing to ask questions. Questions Alternet has never been interested in asking.. such as what did actually go on that day?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How about... Posted by: ChicagoWay
That we've swallowed the Right's kool-aid is the real issue
Posted by: Dickinseattl on Sep 8, 2009 4:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Never mind the alluded to hidden corporate agenda of the far Right, the fact that so many of even midly intelligent media consumers, let alone so called liberals, have bought into the phony complaints against Jones, particularly in regards to 9/11, is probably the best indication of the end times for this nation. That we would believe such impossible bald faced lies about this enormous political crime, which but for a complicit media would have brought this Republican corporate lobbyist organization to an end, is the best indication of the corruption of our entire media, which includes even the few midly progressive programs on MSNBC who have also shown a sycophantic willingness to go along to get along. We are left with just the internet, some public access local TV, and our own independent minds to decern the truth and hope for justice after Obama. One would have hoped that Alternet would have been one such reliable site, but apparently not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Van Jones for California governor
Posted by: greenferret on Sep 8, 2009 6:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Join the movement to draft Van Jones for governor of California:

Draft Van Jones for CA governor

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Awesome piece
Posted by: greendig on Sep 9, 2009 1:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alternet's coverage of Van Jones and Glenn Beck has been really terrific, diving below the surface of political 1-liners. Keep up the great work! I linked to you on my MNN.com story.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MOD Converter
Posted by: flaeir on Sep 9, 2009 3:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
QuickTime Video Converter is your best chosen
MOD Converter

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

complicit or incompetent?
Posted by: agronomo on Sep 9, 2009 7:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I didn't find Jones' subscription to the notion that Bush & Company might have "let 9/11 happen" all that radical. As the facts trickled out after the event it did seem that they were either grossly incompetent or complicit to some degree. Maybe they thought a plane hi-jacking would boost Bush's poll numbers? However, subsequent actions and revelations suggest that they were "only" grossly incompetent. Hardly an exoneration. Think about Katrina.
Regardless, why didn't Obama support Jones? Why try to placate the wingnuts?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: complicit or incompetent? Posted by: ChicagoWay
*sigh*
Posted by: politicky on Sep 9, 2009 12:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wondered. Briefly. I already knew, even though I had no idea who he was.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

end up with governments
Posted by: jmking on Sep 12, 2009 1:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
links of london We could end up with governments on local, state, and national levels with no progressive voices whatsoever. We have to follow Van Jones's advice and "get uppity" ourselves, refusing to give in to the attacks. The tipping point theory has to kick in soon ---- enough is enough.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Today's organized crime
Posted by: teon6 on Oct 2, 2009 2:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Today's organized crime in politics sends its sons (and a few daughters) to private schools to get the kind of training that does organized crime proud. And that level of nefarious corruption reflects in most policies signed, sealed, and delivered from the Oval Office.

Obama appointed people who were in on past policies, or implemented recent ones that align entirely with the Bush neocon agenda. He does not represent OTHER than that, but benefits from the ILLUSION that he has higher ideals, and the vampire diaries season 1 the vampire diaries subs авиаракетно-космическая промышленность сша samsung sgh-b300: инструкция к мобильному телефону heroes сезон 4 субтитры heroes субтитры star trek субтитры nokia 1203: инструкция к мобильному телефону show subtitles tv show subtitles district 9 субтитры титры субтитры the big bang theory субтитры seropol5 were it not for the power of the right wing echo chamber, imagine what the man could get done. Bah, humbug!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

very afraid
Posted by: lukewatson on Oct 2, 2009 12:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I too am afraid the Van Jones fallout has already started with Joseph Kennedy declining a chance to run for his uncle's Senate seat. He must know he'll be tarred and feathered fast and furiously for his association with Hugo Chavez.
Kennedy's good deeds and pragmatic approaches to real problems would not go unpunished. buy specialist

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement