Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

How the White House's Deal With Big Pharma Undermines Democracy

By Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Blog. Posted August 12, 2009.


When an industry gets secret concessions in return for a promise to lend its support to a key piece of legislation, we're in big trouble.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

I'm a strong supporter of universal health insurance, and a fan of the Obama administration. But I'm appalled by the deal the White House has made with the pharmaceutical industry's lobbying arm to buy their support.

Last week, after being reported in the Los Angeles Times, the White House confirmed it has promised Big Pharma that any healthcare legislation will bar the government from using its huge purchasing power to negotiate lower drug prices. That's basically the same deal George W. Bush struck in getting the Medicare drug benefit, and it's proven a bonanza for the drug industry. A continuation will be an even larger bonanza, given all the Boomers who will be enrolling in Medicare over the next decade. And it will be a gold mine if the deal extends to Medicaid, which will be expanded under most versions of the healthcare bills now emerging from Congress, and to any public option that might be included. (We don't know how far the deal extends beyond Medicare because its details haven't been made public.)

Let me remind you: Any bonanza for the drug industry means higher health-care costs for the rest of us, which is one reason why critics of the emerging healthcare plans, including the Congressional Budget Office, are so worried about their failure to adequately stem future healthcare costs. To be sure, as part of its deal with the White House, Big Pharma apparently has promised to cut future drug costs by $80 billion. But neither the industry nor the White House nor any congressional committee has announced exactly where the $80 billion in savings will show up nor how this portion of the deal will be enforced. In any event, you can bet that the bonanza Big Pharma will reap far exceeds $80 billion. Otherwise, why would it have agreed?

In return, Big Pharma isn't just supporting universal health care. It's also spending a lots of money on TV and radio advertising in support. Sunday's New York Times reports that Big Pharma has budgeted $150 million for TV ads promoting universal health insurance, starting this August (that's more money than John McCain spent on TV advertising in last year's presidential campaign), after having already spent a bundle through advocacy groups like Healthy Economies Now and Families USA.

I want universal health insurance. And having had a front-row seat in 1994 when Big Pharma and the rest of the health-industry complex went to battle against it, I can tell you first hand how big and effective the onslaught can be. So I appreciate Big Pharma's support this time around, and I like it that the industry is doing the reverse of what it did last time, and airing ads to persuade the public of the rightness of the White House's effort.

But I also care about democracy, and the deal between Big Pharma and the White House frankly worries me. It's bad enough when industry lobbyists extract concessions from members of Congress, which happens all the time. But when an industry gets secret concessions out of the White House in return for a promise to lend the industry's support to a key piece of legislation, we're in big trouble. That's called extortion: An industry is using its capacity to threaten or prevent legislation as a means of altering that legislation for its own benefit. And it's doing so at the highest reaches of our government, in the office of the President.

When the industry support comes with an industry-sponsored ad campaign in favor of that legislation, the threat to democracy is even greater. Citizens end up paying for advertisements designed to persuade them that the legislation is in their interest. In this case, those payments come in the form of drug prices that will be higher than otherwise, stretching years into the future.

I don't want to be puritanical about all this. Politics is a rough game in which means and ends often get mixed and melded. Perhaps the White House deal with Big Pharma is a necessary step to get anything resembling universal health insurance. But if that's the case, our democracy is in terrible shape. How soon until big industries and their Washington lobbyists have become so politically powerful that secret White House-industry deals like this are prerequisites to any important legislation? When will it become standard practice that such deals come with hundreds of millions of dollars of industry-sponsored TV advertising designed to persuade the public that the legislation is in the public's interest? (Any Democrats and progressives who might be reading this should ask themselves how they'll feel when a Republican White House cuts such deals to advance its own legislative priorities.)

We're on a precarious road -- and wherever it leads, it's not toward democracy.

© 2009 Robert Reich


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: democracy, obama, health care, white house, big pharma

Robert Reich's latest book, "Supercapitalism," is now out in paperback. For copies of articles, books, and public radio commentaries, go to www.robertreich.org.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Politics! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Yes, We Did
Posted by: RevolutionNet on Aug 12, 2009 1:14 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Convince ourselves that change can happen within a closed, rigged system.


FREE AMERICA

REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Don't give up Posted by: james108
» (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY Posted by: SteveA
yes, it's necessary
Posted by: youmustbejoking on Aug 12, 2009 1:38 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Perhaps the White House deal with Big Pharma is a necessary step to get anything resembling universal health insurance. But if that's the case, our democracy is in terrible shape"

actually, your democracy is in its death throes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

An Obama Team Mistake ....
Posted by: drricklippin on Aug 12, 2009 3:38 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
....But not fatal

For obvious reasons this industry cannot and should not go away.

But we should not trust current Big PhRMA for years. Their venal and greedy practices have harmed millions of Americans.

Right now they need to be tightly regulated with enforcable provisions with real teeth. And some of their CEOs need to go to jail.

If and when they regain out trust we can work with them as a responsible industry.

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Still puts party over issues. Otherwise, great article.
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Aug 12, 2009 4:19 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Robert Reich was booted off the Clinton Team (Excuse me, officially Reich left "...the department to spend more time with his sons....").

What I don't understand is why he feels the need to kiss the Party hand and praise Obama. Does he still think he's influencing Democratic policy when he effectively argues there isn't a sliver of difference between the Bush and Obama administration when it comes to Pharma companies?

But why stop there? What's the difference between Obama and Bush on Oil, MIL, Insurance, NAFTA, EDU?

Reich should fight to stall the "Insurance Reform" bill Obama panders, and fight to secure single-payer, citizen-based health care.

Imagine if the progressives and independents actually stalled the insurance reform bill instead of the advertised "scary right-wing lynch mobs" Party Line Democratic politicians tell us are blocking "our"(?)path from getting "nationalized health care"...

We can stand to fight for single-payer, citizen-based. We don't have to accept neo-liberals like Obama. We don't have to continue to accept crumbs. Obama intentionally creates an artificial 'urgency of now' to exploit our ability to reason. And Pharma, et al are signed up to win big if the bill goes through.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Pitiful excuse. Posted by: photon's feather
» What ? Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» RE: yes---where IS the green party? Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» RE: yes---where IS the green party? Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» RE: yes---where IS the green party? Posted by: photon's feather
see original post at wall street pit:
Posted by: gunboat diplomat on Aug 12, 2009 4:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here is the original post with some good comments.

wallstreetpit.com

M.A. said:

...If you want to point to industries enjoying a “bonanza” with the current broken healthcare system, look at the INSURANCE industry."

"If you want to talk about the high cost of healthcare, look elsewhere - pharmaceutical products are actually a small portion of the total healthcare bill for Americans. It seems otherwise because we have to go to the drugstore to pay - sometimes out of pocket, but almost always at least a co-pay - for medicines. But doctors’ visits, hospital stays and insurance costs are the bulk of what we pay for healthcare."

"Pharmaceutical companies - American and foreign alike - are struggling across the board - track their stock prices, for example, of the . The billions of dollars invested in R&D to bring new medicines to the market (adding years to our lives, let me remind you!) are invested with the hope of maybe one new drug a year coming to market - and with an expectation that a profitable price can be achieved."

"If you want to see even more major companies shrink in value to desparately be bought up as the industry continues to consolidate, setting a price cap on branded products is the way to go. While you’re at it, why don’t we set price caps on all of our nation’s products. That should be a great way to spur investments in our businesses and re-stimulate our economy."

CL said:

"I agree with you in large measure except for your comment about them spending billions to bring drugs to market. Most of the basic medical research done in this country is done by the NIH through tax-sponsored grants. In many cases the drug discovery done by Big Pharma means taking that, quite expensive, basic research and tailoring it, or simply claiming it outright."

"Courtesy of the Byah-Dole act NIH sponsored drug research can be “sold” to drug companies and can become their private property. Thus they can show up and purchase and then claim ownership of advances paid for by your and my tax dollars."

"As a case in point two of the more successful moneymakers of the past decade AZT and Viagra were developed by federal funds. In both cases the resulting drugs were ‘purchased’ by private entities who then claimed private ownership of them and charged money to cover ‘their’ research costs."

"The billions spent to bring new drugs to market are indeed billions. However the money rarely comes from the companies themselves. More often than not it comes initially from you and I."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» good post-ty Posted by: Drclaw
Mandatory insurance?
Posted by: December5 on Aug 12, 2009 5:07 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone who thinks mandatory health insurance will reduce health care costs is certifiably insane.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mandatory insurance? Posted by: kettleblack
» RE: Mandatory insurance? Posted by: clvngodess
We're on a precarious road -- and wherever it leads, it's not toward democracy.
Posted by: timenotonmyside on Aug 12, 2009 5:44 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yup, that about sums it up.

The Washington Establishment voices insist we cannot "rush" a $1 trillion health care reform package through Congress. After pushing a $12 trillion no-strings-attached handout to Wall Street, they actually insist that they don't want to "rush" health care because of it's price tag.

So yes, it is EXTORTION when Big Pharma gets secret concessions out of the White House in return for a promise to lend the industry's support to a key piece of legislation.

Smells kinda of like the ''too big to fail'' crap we were sold with Wall Street.

We as Americans have been conditioned to not react. The status quo remains in campaign finance reform, term limits, and lobbyists buying our so called elected officials on any given day.

Yup, it's not democracy anymore.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Politics - Chicago Style
Posted by: kettleblack on Aug 12, 2009 7:33 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Looks like Chicago has come to DC, or at least the Chicago mobsters.
Where does the $80 Billion Bribe go to?
Should it not go to help reduce the cost of Health Care?

Don't worry - we won't hear any more about $80B.
It will simply vanish into someone's bank account.
Power corrupts. Just ask the Republicans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is today's deal - relax
Posted by: mrxls on Aug 12, 2009 7:52 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Use big pharma to crush the insurance companies lobbyists. Let government competition further weaken that sector. 5 or 10 years down the road with a strong government plan and lots more public acceptance go after the drug companies.

divide and conquer

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Idiot Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: Idiot Posted by: willymack
» Obama a "gradualist"? Posted by: Paul_C
US gets a club savings card
Posted by: leafsong1 on Aug 12, 2009 8:00 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Which will give them a generous discount equal to the amount by which prices were recently raised. Seriously, many millions of Americans face this scam every day at their local global supermarket chain. How humiliating is it that the Obama administration is pretending to be fooled?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dancing With The Devil
Posted by: liblady2008 on Aug 12, 2009 8:43 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This deal stinks. They can keep charging folks $200 for one pill and for what? Big Pharma spending money to promote Obama's watered down reform which will force even more money to the insurance companies?

Individuals should not hold their breath for any real relief.

This pact illustrates why we need to get money totally out of politics. Until we do not much is going to change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Money out of Politics Posted by: reelectnoone
Stinks ... but so does limburger cheese
Posted by: reelectnoone on Aug 12, 2009 8:55 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's be realistic about this. Any such deal stinks, but when you consider that Congress has already been purchased by the health care insurance companies, Obama is left in the position of a deal he makes or the deal Congress will make.

We know Congress would make the same deal but that in that case Big Pharma will spend their millions to lobby against reform.

Since the deal will be the same either way, Obama had to choose to beat Congress to the punch and at least get support for the rest of the plan to help counter the insurance companies.

Such are the realities of politics. Sometimes you must choose between a bad deal or no deal at all.

While I don't like it, if it helps get some measure of reform passed I can accept it. Besides it can be changed later.

I sure have no problem sticking it to Big Pharma who, if they were at all concerned with America, would always offer the lowest price anyway.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not just support
Posted by: james108 on Aug 12, 2009 9:08 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The White House promised in secret to actually block any legislation aimed at saving the people money beyond a vague promise of x dollar savings over 10 years. All they have to do is raise their prices to call it savings. In return, they bankroll a fake corporate feel good facade of reform.

It's probably not the only secret deal either, just one they had to acknowledge under threat because of Congress's attempts to save people money.

That's what this fake health care reform is really about, putting a nice face on public theft, at the additional cost of human lives and misery, kind of like the Afghan war, and that's why it's frustrating to see self proclaimed progressives blindly support it. All of a sudden we don't fight wars for oil based on lies, and Obama, corporate America's Trilateral Commission star, needs all dissent quieted by his little drones.

What about actually being progressive, and demanding things like single payer be put on the table, and Obama be honest about his intentions. While the progressive movement is led by a liar, the right wingers have a very valid point, that there's shady, mislabeled deals in the works.

Most people are for reform. As carefully packaged as the media story is, not everyone falls in the category of either not wanting any reform, or wanting Obama's masquerading corporate sham.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I wrote this elsewhere on AlterNet, but it applies here, too . . .
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on Aug 12, 2009 9:19 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's often uncomfortable being a moderate - you find yourself on occasion agreeing with one extreme or the other - but . . .

For me, the most thunderous by its absence from the discussion of what is being billed as health care reform - in the bewildered minds of the liberal and the young, all change is good - is mention of yet another law and its federal administrators like H.R. 3200 and those who will administer it. The U.S. Tax code and its "administrators," the IRS.

Half way now through the convolute morass of arcane and esoteric language that is the H.R. 3200, I recognize another law through which I once fought my way - the Tax Code. There is a reason for the way laws like this are written, of course. When no one can say what the law means, the "administrator" becomes nothing more nor less than a dictator.

Like IRS. When this verbal and grammatical monstrosity becomes law, the government will have come to control the publics health. Want to talk about how long it will take to get medical attention? Consider how long it will take you to get to court - and, when the "administrator" to the health care system has established its own courts, imagine how often the petitioner will win - no, don't imagine; go to a law library and read it.

Get it through your Operation MOCKINGBIRD media-bewildered head that the corporation who own government are not interestt in the public's health (any more than the American Medical Association is). They are interesting in CONTROLLING the public's health.

And if you don't believe that means deciding who will live or die (say "get medical attention or not" if you can't handle the verbiage) you haven't been paying attention.

That is exactly what the IRS did - and continues to do. The hideous truth about the number of persons who died - not just suicides, but heart attacks, complete emotional collapses and far more - under the cruel administration of IRS has long been concealed by the media, too. Oh, it's in the record - both the law libraries and the newspapers' files - for all to see, but you don't look because there's always a Michael Jackson story or the something even more lewd to keep your behaviorally altered mind busy.

And while the public who might otherwise have come to your aid by being alert and paying attention, and by demanding that the media keep them informed of such matters, drools over the latest Nancy Grace case, you will die waiting to get your health care case through the system and its courts. Just like people who trusted their congress to oversee rather than overlook IRS.

Get some understanding of what history would teach you, were you to ever read it; and get you head straight: government is in the business of deciding who lives and who dies. "The power to tax," Thomas Jefferson said famously, "is the power to destroy.

George Washington said it better. "Government is not reason," he warned, "it is not eloquence (read the damned law before you run off at the mouth about what it says and will do), it is force; like fire, a troublesome servant and a fearful master."

If you don't stop thinking like the brain-paralized ideologues who write here, you will learn the lesson of history - the lesson taught by the IRS for more than a century now -the hard way. And you will have deserved it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It should be illegal...
Posted by: dbarber on Aug 12, 2009 9:45 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...for ANY corporation to sponsor political or public policy advertising. For that matter, government doing the same should also be severely restricted to informational purposes. STOP the propaganda!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It should be illegal... Posted by: SteveA
Fascism & Socialism
Posted by: luvnrockets on Aug 12, 2009 10:12 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Repubs have gotten in bed with the oil and defense industries, and now the Dems are getting in bed with pharma - this is Fascism.

And of course, socialized medicine is right around the corner.

The point of healthcare reform is to lower the cost AND increase the choices for every citizen. With ObamaCare we'll get the opposite and it will be a major disaster to this country (which by the way already has the best medical care in the world).

What solutions do either party provide that best lowers the cost AND increases our choices????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» h.r. 676... Posted by: undrgrndgirl
Two Party System is the culprit
Posted by: cynicalone on Aug 12, 2009 11:10 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is our two Party system that is the culprit. Anyone with knowledge of procurement and purchasing will tell you, a true competitive bidding situation (the Political Parties do bid for our votes) needs at minimum three parties to avoid the inevitable collusion that will occur between just two.

They certainly do collude for the big money and have split the two major money sources between them. Generally the Republicans have the Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce and the Democrats have the Wall Street bankers and financiers. They treat their respective moneyed constituencies well, while average American people lose.

When private sector organized labor became a weak sister as a result of Reagan, both Bush's and Clinton trade policies is when this all came together. It can be blamed on both business and Wall St. But the victims are average Americans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» True Posted by: james108
Obama as Neo Fascist puppet?
Posted by: Jill 2 on Aug 12, 2009 11:44 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
George Bush was too coarse a transition into full blown fascism; John McCain was more of the same; both had become liabilities for the political ruling classes who were still committed to the incremental transition to corporate fascism. Barack Obama is nothing more than a stylistic finesse, a more palatable and hence useful illusion, serving as a little more than a more easeful tool, and puppet of the American Plutocracy.

Astute students of the charade called American politics have known this for a long time. Both the Republicans and the Democrats represent oscillations, mere managerial variants between the essential core of Neo fascism characteristic of American politics. No one should continue to hold any illusions that the American plutocracy and their political servants are anything less than a uniquely American fascism. This is no longer a histrionic analysis of what is usually mocked and disparaged as "the loony left." This insight has become the central truth from which all further analysis must proceed.

Obama represents simply another stage of adminstering the transitional phasing into fascism, by increments, style and theater. Soon, that will no longer be necessary. It no longer can be reversed. The Postmodern "whatever" consciousness of a de-spirited, de-politicized, and addled American people will adjust readily to the new reality. It already has. America can only default to fascism.–(Jill Bains)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Are you Neo Fascist puppet? n/t Posted by: foreverhope
Xntrk
Posted by: Xntrk on Aug 12, 2009 2:19 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Elsewhere, there is a lengthy discussion about Fascism. Is it because this deal is with Big Pharma rather than Boeing, that the connection seems less obvious here?

A government run by, and for, big corporations is a Fascist government. I am not certain how many ways that has to be spelled out before the implications sink in. Mussolini made the trains run on time. Obama makes Health Care appear available, while selling the Office of the Presidency. Rather than 'growing a pair', as has been suggested elsewhere, Obama seems to have decided paying off the Extortionists is less of a hassle. Maybe seeing Senators being yelled at frightened him.

And, while this farce is being played out on the Domestic Policy Front, we are now fighting 3 Wars in the Mid-East, preparing for future engagements in Africa, and returning to our usual covert, and overt, policies in Latin America. I think it is fair to say that 7 new Army Bases in Columbia, and activating the Fourth Fleet, is a return to business as usual - Unless you think Nuclear Subs and Aircraft Carriers are a necessary component of stopping drug smuggling. Should I bother to mention the WALL on our Southern border, and the war going on in Mexico.

How is it possible to ignore torture, headless bodies, and increasingly bloody mayhem, going on at the next door neighbors? Is our whole country anesthetized? I know the Media is Government controlled, but I wasn't aware they already controlled the minds and emotions of the entire population.

Perhaps this deal with Big Pharma is a deal with the Military Establishment. We get phony Health Care, and they get to experiment with various drugs to see which are the most effective for total mind control. It wouldn't be the first time it was tried. They did experiments with all kinds of shit in the '60s, in both the Military and the Prison System. Money may not be the only enticement...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

National Drug Research and Development
Posted by: maxsmart on Aug 12, 2009 3:18 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There should be a national not for profit program for realistic and safe development for the most necessary treatments and not a race amoung high flying researchers for the next most profitable drug. It shouldn't have multiple organizations of super high paid professionals cutting corners and over duplicting research. And they ahouldn't be viewed and marketed as panaceas for everyone. And as with healthcare all the added costs of for profit development added onto the sticker price for people in sickness and distress.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What you REALLY need
Posted by: SteveA on Aug 12, 2009 3:50 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The solution to this is getting back to the Constitution as written, with low enough taxation that us little guys have enough money left in our pockets to pay for our own doctors or insurance, and the government completely out of the picture.

Yes, I have been smoking. Why do you ask WHAT I've been smoking?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pharma Must Be Taken Down
Posted by: Gravitas on Aug 12, 2009 5:06 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From pocketing politicians to poisoning pills, pharma just keeps on getting dirtier. But don't blame it all on Obama. The people let the system happen and the people will have to change the system. That means saying no to unnecessary pills and health scares (like the phony anti obesity hysteria created by pharma!)
"We must be the change we want to see in the world!" Gandhi

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ROBERT! DO YA THINK PRES. OBAMA MIGHT KNOW WE'RE ALREADY IN PRETTY BIG TROUBLE?
Posted by: foreverhope on Aug 12, 2009 6:03 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please read this Robert and THINK about IT!

PRIVATE FOR PROFIT HEALTHCARE IS AN OXYMORON

AMERICA’S NATIONAL HEALTHCARE EMERGENCY!

More than two thirds of the American people want a single payer health care system. And if they cant have a single payer system 76% of all Americans want a strong government-run public option on day one (85% of democrats, 71% of independents, and 60% republicans). Basically everyone.

It’s official. America and the World are now in a GLOBAL PANDEMIC. A World EPIDEMIC with potential catastrophic consequences for ALL of the American people. The first PANDEMIC in 41 years. And WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES will have to face this PANDEMIC with the 37th worst quality of healthcare in the developed World.

STAND READY AMERICA TO SEIZE CONTROL OF YOUR NATIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM.

We spend over twice as much of our GDP on healthcare as any other country in the World. And Individual American spend about ten times as much out of pocket on healthcare as any other people in the World. All because of GREED! And the PRIVATE FOR PROFIT healthcare system in America.

And while all this is going on, some members of congress seem mostly concern about how to protect the corporate PROFITS! of our GREED DRIVEN, PRIVATE FOR PROFIT NATIONAL DISGRACE. A PRIVATE FOR PROFIT DISGRACE that is in fact, totally valueless to the public health. And a detriment to national security, public safety, and the public health.

Progressive democrats the Tri-Caucus and others should stand firm in their demand for a robust government-run public option for all Americans, with all of the minimum requirements progressive democrats demanded. If congress can not pass a robust public option with at least 51 votes and all robust minimum requirements, congress should immediately move to scrap healthcare reform and request that President Obama declare a state of NATIONAL HEALTHCARE EMERGENCY! Seizing and replacing all PRIVATE FOR PROFIT health insurance plans with the immediate implementation of National Healthcare for all Americans under the provisions of HR676 (A Single-payer National Healthcare Plan For All).

Coverage can begin immediately through our current medicare system. With immediate expansion through recruitment of displaced workers from the canceled private sector insurance industry. Funding can also begin immediately by substitution of payroll deductions for private insurance plans with payroll deductions for the national healthcare plan. This is what the vast majority of the American people want. And this is what all objective experts unanimously agree would be the best, and most cost effective for the American people and our economy.

In Mexico on average people who received medical care for H1N1 (Swine Flu) with in 3 days survived. People who did not receive medical care until 7 days or more died. This has been the same results in the US. But 50 million Americans don’t even have any healthcare coverage. And at least 200 million of you with insurance could not get in to see your private insurance plans doctors in 2 or 3 days, even if your life depended on it. WHICH IT DOES!

If President Obama has to declare a NATIONAL STATE OF EMERGENCY to rescue the American people from our healthcare crisis, he will need all the sustained support you can give him. STICK WITH HIM! He’s doing a brilliant job.

THIS IS THE BIG ONE!

THE BATTLE OF GOOD Vs EVIL!

Join the fight.

Contact congress and your representatives NOW! AND SPREAD THE WORD!

God Bless You

Jacksmith – WORKING CLASS

(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ian-welsh /americans-lives-vs-insura_b_241703.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HEY ROBERT!
Posted by: foreverhope on Aug 12, 2009 6:06 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do you have anyone you love? Anyone that loves you? Do you have a single friend? Anyone you care about? Even you next door neighbor? Do you think some deals must be made NOW to protect us from the curse heading our way as you type your blog Robert? Do you think our democracy is already at risk with what is happening at town hall meetings to keep any HCR at all from happening?

THINK ABOUT IT DUDE!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HEY ROBERT!
Posted by: foreverhope on Aug 12, 2009 6:14 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do you THINK even *BIG PHARMA* might know we are in BIG BIG trouble? Maybe they have family, friends, children, mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers, neighbors.....

Maybe this is what NEEDS TO BE NOW! Maybe the "White House" has more info than you have? Maybe our President knows more than you but doesn't wish to alarm the public further than we are right this moment as I type?

THINK ROBERT! THINK!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: HEY ROBERT! Posted by: jim207
Poor old Goebbels had No Balls At All
Posted by: Triton on Aug 13, 2009 11:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
During WWII the Brits had a song set to the Colonel Bogey march. It was devoted to a description of the number and the anatomy of the testicles of the Nazi leaders. WWII is long over but the current administration clearly has no balls at all. Nothing is surprising any more about the extent to which the big corporations decide the policies and actions of the government of the United States. A democracy based on greed, dishonesty and lack of care for the environment cannot survive. We are at the point where lies replace truth, cowardice replaces courage and a scheming weasel replaces the President.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement