Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Rating the Greatest GOP Sex Scandals of the Past 20 Years

By Brad Reed, AlterNet. Posted June 26, 2009.


From Clarence Thomas to Mark Sanford, the definitive guide to randy Republicans
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Give this to Republicans: They know how to conduct sex scandals in style.

Oh sure, Democrats have their sex scandals, but they're not nearly as interesting. For one thing, most Democrats busted in sex scandals aren't the same type of overbearing moral scolds as your average GOP politician. (The one recent exception was former New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer, whose work shutting down prostitution rings left him open to charges of bald hypocrisy when he was caught rendezvousing with a prostitute himself.)

Additionally, Democratic sex scandals tend to be of the more vanilla nature: affairs with campaign workers and interns are pretty standard fare as far as modern political culture goes, as are visits to high-priced call girls.

The GOP's deviants, on the other hand, have brought a wealth of oddball debaucheries to the table, from failed bathroom-stall hookups to slimy messages sent to underage congressional pages to rumored S&M diaper fantasies. So let's review the past 20 years of Republican sex scandals and rate each one on a scale of 1 to 10 based on factors such as hypocrisy, legal liability, the damage inflicted upon the perpetrators' careers and overall comedy.

1991: Clarence Thomas

To be fair, none of the allegations against Thomas could ever be proved, and most of the congressional hearings on the matter amounted to he-said-she-said testimony. Even so, Anita Hill's cringe-inducing charges that Thomas allegedly talked openly about pornographic films and pubic hair in the workplace captivated the nation. The hearings also marked the first -- and hopefully the last -- time that Orrin Hatch mentioned "Long Dong Silver" on the floor of the Senate.

Rating: 6. Thomas was confirmed as a Supreme Court justice despite the controversy, so it's not like the scandal had any lasting damage on his career. Also, there's nothing particularly funny about sexual harassment in the workplace, so this rating is only as high as it is due to Hatch's appreciation for Long Dong Silver.

1993: Sen. Bob Packwood

Interestingly, Packwood was a rare Republican who was supportive of abortion rights and was described by Boston Globe columnist Ellen Goodman as a "friend of feminism." That view changed for the worse, however, when 10 women accused him of sexual harassment or misconduct in the pages of the Washington Post. Packwood's friends tried to come to his defense, but for the most part, they ended up doing more harm than good. Ed Westerdahl, a member of the steering committee for Packwood's first Senate race in 1968, told the New York Times that we should be more forgiving of his old boss' behavior because "20 years ago, at parties, I'd see people doing much more than he's being accused of, and nobody gave it a second thought," and "the pinching, touching, feeling was considered to be friendly, not harassing." Even if we accept this preposterous premise, of course, it should be noted that the Oregon senator was also committing adultery, and I'm pretty sure there are some very old laws around describing that as a no-no as well.

Rating: 2. The lack of overt hypocrisy, and the creepiness of Packwood's advances leave this one without any innate comic value. Sex scandals are only funny if they involve consensual sex, after all.

1990s: Rep. Newt Gingrich

Now this is where things get fun.

Throughout his career, this Georgia lawmaker has been one of the biggest moral charlatans in American political discourse. While he was impeaching President Bill Clinton for lying under oath about his affair with Monica Lewinsky, Gingrich said that Clinton had shown "a level of disrespect and decadence that should appall every American" after he had reduced the office of the presidency to the "rough equivalent of the 'Jerry Springer' show." The whole time, of course, Newt was cheating on his second wife with a woman more than 20 years his younger (who would later become his third wife). And then there's the matter of his first wife, with whom Gingrich initiated a divorce while she was recovering from cancer surgery.

Rating: 7. Newt's untamed loins get high marks for their comic levels of hypocrisy. What's amazing about the guy is that he has absolutely no shame, even after being exposed as a fraud. Rather than taking a more, dare we say it, Christian approach, in not judging others lest he be judged, Newt is still going on television ranting about "a gay and secular fascism in this country" that is "a very dangerous threat to anybody who believes in traditional religion."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: gop, family values, sex scandals, hypocrisy

Brad Reed is a writer living in Boston. His work has previously appeared in the American Prospect Online, and he blogs frequently at Sadly, No!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Politics! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Pride goeth before destruction....
Posted by: ohb0b on Jun 26, 2009 11:58 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... and a haughty spirit before a fall.

Sure, it's funny when it happens to sanctimonious moral crusaders, but there are more Eliot Spitzer's and John Edwards' waiting in the wings. We need to tread carefully. Take advantage of the carnage, but don't get too cocky. Let him who is without sin cast the first stone.

So don't get on the high horse, it's a long fall.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hit post too soon Posted by: ohb0b
» RE: Hit post too soon Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Hit post too soon Posted by: dangerouslysane
» Proverbs 16:18 Posted by: cdmsr
» RE: Pride goeth before destruction.... Posted by: dangerouslysane
» RE: Pride goeth before destruction.... Posted by: progressive-life
» Oh, please... Posted by: Curio
Who cares
Posted by: sirios on Jun 26, 2009 12:40 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If no one showed any concern for such matters, then there would be no scandal. Of course one can enter into the arguments of morality, religion, trust, lying etc. as the baseline for scandalous behavior but if people stopped showing self righteous shock over the matter, it would soon disappear from the headlines.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who cares Posted by: dangerouslysane
You Left Out a Good One
Posted by: Lilly on Jun 26, 2009 12:47 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's get this one into the archives: When Jack Ryan, a handsome young Republican Harvard JD, ran for Illinois State Senator in 2004, he came up against a problem. It seems that his heart's desire was to have sex with his wife with an audience watching them. He really-really-rally wanted to DO IT in front of people. Trouble was, his wife wouldn't go along with the plan. They would start out to go someplace else then he would change course and drive her to the sex club where he intended the fun & games to take place, then she would cry and make a scene and refuse. But he kept on doing this, and if you are running for State Senator there are only so many times you can do this kind of thing and not get noticed. So: he got noticed, and the trouble was all over the papers, and Ryan was forced to withdraw from the race. By now the clock was ticking toward November, so the GOP gang all ran around screaming trying to think of who to put in Ryan's place. Then somebody had a brainstorm. Voila, they brought in Alan Keyes. The election results soon became a chapter in American history, because in the 2004 Illinois Senatorial race Alan Keyes won 30% of the vote---the other 70% went to his opponent, Barack Obama.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You Left Out a Good One Posted by: MyLeftFoot
» And his wife was 7-of-9 Posted by: cdmsr
WHAT DISTURBS ME ?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jun 26, 2009 1:36 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, there's the obvious morality thing and not a way for these men to treat their wives. But there's a topic that no one touches. These men don't just have quiet affairs. There is always craziness attached to it. And no one questions their ability to be responsible in their jobs after the dust settles. Sorry, they are incompetent and unable to make rational decisions. Therefore unfit for the office they hold. thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WHAT DISTURBS ME ? Posted by: hagwind
» RE: WHAT DISTURBS ME ? Posted by: Beck
» RE: WHAT DISTURBS ME ? Posted by: lasirene
more on David Vitter
Posted by: ozonehole on Jun 26, 2009 4:47 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think Vitter rates a 10. Unlike Elliot Spitzer, Vitter didn't resign. He says that he prayed to Jesus and has been washed of his sins. He's running for re-election in 2010.

Sure hopes he gets caught again in his diapers, partnered with a gay priest using a dustmop handle on Vitter's rectum as he watches kiddie porn. But I'm sure Jesus will forgive him again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: more on David Vitter Posted by: victrola
Mark Sanford
Posted by: dangerouslysane on Jun 26, 2009 10:40 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Besides being AWOL for a week, the New York Times had a front page story with the headline that the SC Governor used state funds to travel to see his mistress in Argentina.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mark Sanford Posted by: emen
Don't forget Ted Haggard
Posted by: marxwuzrite on Jun 26, 2009 11:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now Ted Haggard may not have been officially a GOP politician, but he was a big mucky muck in GOP/evangical christian circles. Ted says he bought crank, but threw it away. He also went to to gay prostitute for a "massage", which is probably technically true.

Now he has been "cured".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Don't forget Ted Haggard Posted by: timenotonmyside
When...
Posted by: andrushka on Jun 27, 2009 3:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ethics rather than the Bible is the yardstick for everyone, but particularly politicians, America will possibly be better off.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just a question.
Posted by: redstar1970 on Jun 27, 2009 5:04 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When did AlterNet decide to lower its standards to that of such illustrious gossip rags as the National Enquirer and the Star?

It's really kinda sad when a source of supposed progressive news offers this sort of drivel. Way to lower the bar.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Just a question. Posted by: timenotonmyside
» RE: Just a question. Posted by: christee
» RE: Just a question. Posted by: Bibsisis
Democrats should take a different approach to these scandals
Posted by: Gabba_Gabba_Hey on Jun 27, 2009 5:12 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's true these Republican scandals are almost always extremely hypocritical. But I think we Democrats should practice what WE tend to preach and just shrug them off... say "meh."

I saw Eleanor Clift (house liberal on "The McLaughlin Group") come to the wrong conclusion about this - she said Sanford should resign. But why? To say that is to reinforce the Republicans' loopy idea that private sex lives have or should have any effect on public policy.

Interestingly, Americans in Victorian times had a better grasp of reality. They elected Grover Cleveland - a Democrat whose sex life made Bill Clinton's look sedate - in 1884 over his politically & financially corrupt Republican opponent Blaine.

Let's return to 19th century American values and keep the focus where it belongs - on corruption, not sex.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Did you call for Clinton's resignation? Posted by: Gabba_Gabba_Hey
» No, I didn't Posted by: hagwind
» the problem is... Posted by: luzmejor
So it's a partial list
Posted by: timenotonmyside on Jun 27, 2009 5:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but the fact of the matter remains,they will receive their lifetime healthcare and pension benefits from us the taxpayers. Oh sure they are all CHRISTIANS and even Vitter has the nerve to say he's prayed to Jesus for redemption.
Taxpayers DON'T NEED REDEMPTION - we need politicians who can and will do their jobs.
How about passing a bill, if your caught, your out and no more pension and healthcare - do you think these fine CHRISTIANS will be able to take the moral high ground they love to espouse if the stakes are truely high?
Yes there will always be sex scandals but do we have to pay for them?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Post Script To Newt; Bob Livingston
Posted by: gradioc on Jun 27, 2009 6:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When Newt stepped down from the Speaker's chair the GOP caucus chose Bob Livingston (R-LA) to replace him. Before he could even be voted on by the full House reporters discovered that he, too, had cheated on his wife. Livingston withdrew from the Speaker race and resigned from Congress. It was starting to look as if the House GOP couldn't find ANYBODY morally superior to Bill Clinton to lead the charge for impeachment. It would have been hilarious had it not been so pathetic. Oh, and Livingston's successor to his house seat was none other than David Vitter. Priceless.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sanford compared himself to the Biblical King David, when asked whether he'd resign
Posted by: Beck on Jun 27, 2009 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He stated that King David, after sending for an attractive woman, Bathsheba, that he saw bathing on a nearby rooftop and then having her husband killed in battle when she ended up pregnant , got "back to work". (Good thing Sanford's mistress isn't married.) What Sanford seems to have forgotten is that God punished David and Bathsheba by having the baby, a son, die (after arranging for the death of the husband, David married Bathsheba, adding her to his many wives. David, however, first did bring the husband home on furlough, thinking he'd have sex and think the baby was his. Unhappily for David, the husband refused such comforts while his men were still suffering in battle). Take heed, those of you who are always stating that God punishes other people only! He seems to get pretty specific, with punishments fitting crimes in that incredibly neat and tidy way they do in these centuries-old stories. Also take heed, those who think that the only fair world contains consequence-free sex! Doesn't seem like a good goal to strive towards :D

Of course, in the odd way that these stories take unexpected turns, one of Bathsheba's later pregnancies produced Solomon the wise.

And oddest of all, conservatives compare themselves to great Biblical names, obviously not bothering to find out the whole story. I guess they assume there isn't a whole story, and apparently no one else knows it either.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh give me a country
Posted by: sherry on Jun 27, 2009 7:45 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
where we recognize the real scandels: lack of national health care, invasion of a sovereign nation, the Patriot Act, filling our prisons with first-time drug offenders, corporate takeover of our schools via standardized testing, and on and on.

At the same time, it would be nice to recognize the difference between casual, exploitive, even paid-for sex and falling in love. Sanford is painfully in love and torn, given all his religious indoctrination probably in real torment. On his performance as a governor, I'm ready to tear him to pieces, but in his private life, give him some space.

What a silly article. Days like this I really want to move to France.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Oh give me a country Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
» RE: Oh give me a country Posted by: anneliese-nyc
overbearing moral scolds?
Posted by: jal64 on Jun 27, 2009 7:49 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Kennedy the prez, Edwards, Kennedy the wannabe prez, Spitzer, Kennedy the senator, Clinton the rapist (remember Juanita Broadrick? She makes goodoleBill a raving 10), Kennedy the murderer nephew, the list goes on and on. This subject has nothing to do with politics and everything to do with plain old fashioned morals. Dems are just as human as GOP'ers

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You forgot one of the best ones! Randy "Duke" Cunningham!
Posted by: captainhall on Jun 27, 2009 7:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Randy "Duke" Cunningham, as I recall, was given a yacht "The Dukester" as a bribe by a defense contractor. With blood on his hands for being a wartime profiteer in the worst sense, "Top Gun" Cunningham would give wild parties on his yacht with whores. Here's the payoff to the story: He filled the on-board Jacuzzi with disgusting water from the Potomac and go skinny-dipping in it, but his whores and contractors would refuse to take a dip with him. Of course, he did all of this (and much more) while cheating on his wife and railing in congress for a flag burning amendment. He's now rotting away in prison. Among the "booty" that was seized by the feds, were his Rancho Santa Fe mansion in California and an antique commode. I would rate him a perfect 10. I think Tom Cruise should do a new movie about the Top Gun's fall from grace - don't you? That would be cool! Vanity Fair in the August, 2006 edition. The story was called "Hookers At The Gate. Inside the sleaziest Washington Scandal Yet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

well what do you expect...
Posted by: dsmidiman on Jun 27, 2009 8:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I said the day back in 2000 the courts gave GWB the presidency that by the time he was out of office the American public would be so pissed off at republicans that we would elect donald duck before we elected another republican!! Republicans and thier conservative so called religious financial backers are the most hypocritical, self serving dictator wannabes I have ever seen! I am so sick of the "Jimmy Swaggart" syndrome of apology that comes with most everyone of these ludirous scandals I want to scream. Everytime I see one of those hypocrital righteous impersonators talk and accuse others of wrong doing it makes me puke!! If I were a republican I would be ashamed to stick my head out the door much less try to defend thier nonsense. It's insane!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You "forgot" the best one of all!!!
Posted by: archivistIII on Jun 27, 2009 8:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lawrence E. King

I guess pimping out kids at cocaine parties is OK with Alternet?

Franklin child prostitution ring allegations - Wikipedia

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHAT ABOUT DEMOCRATS?
Posted by: Birdland on Jun 27, 2009 8:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm just curious to see a list of Democrats too. I consider myself an Independent and believe all politicians are fair game. Most of all, I wish people would stop re-electing the majority of politicians in office today. Most don't give two hoots about "we the people". Vote them out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hurry before they do it!
Posted by: luckypuck on Jun 27, 2009 9:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please, please, please. Before the lurking Repubs post it, will someone with the ability to do so post a list of Democrat scandals? Kind of cut them off at the knees before they can run with that kind of thing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

why is morality defined by sexuality?
Posted by: mo on Jun 27, 2009 9:30 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i'm so tired of sex being "bad".
there are so many other terrible things happening in our government and culture that are TRULY immoral.

a woman who enjoys sex with several partners is described as having
"the morals of an alleycat"
there is nothing immoral about those women, or alleycats for that matter.

i'm sick of this holier than thou attitude about what is really nobody's business, other than the people invoved.

economic enslavement is immoral,
violent crime is immoral,
rapacious corporatism is immoral.

both parties are guilty of the ridiculous use of the word "immoral"
as it applies to sex, and seemingly only to sex.

let it go people, it's the pursuit of happiness for some people, even if you don't understand or subscribe to that way of life.

and please don't start up about the hypocrisey(sp?) issue. both sides of the middle of the road are guilty.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

steveb
Posted by: stevebonzai on Jun 27, 2009 11:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nobody mentioned Guckert. the gay prostitute with all the visits to the Whitehouse. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Gannon

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Huffington-style list-news
Posted by: Jaffe on Jun 27, 2009 11:21 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gossip catalogs of naughty Republicans. Hey, this is faux-flashy Huffington jive.

Like other sites, AlterNet is scrambling for readers and $$, but I can't believe that legit progressives are down with this shit.

Might as well kill time scanning ungrammatical celebrity tweets.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

teaching tolerance and forgiveness
Posted by: vasumurti on Jun 27, 2009 11:57 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't expect conservatives to embrace sexual freedom, but they really should be teaching tolerance and forgiveness.

Back in 1990, my friend Rankin Fisher, a former Missionary Baptist minister, who also happens to be gay, commented, "No religion can condone homosexuality."

That may be, but no religion can condone sex outside of marriage, either. People are doing these things anyway! Who am I to pass judgment on another?

"All have sinned and all fall short of the glory of God," is how the apostle Paul put it.

Paul taught his followers to bless their persecutors and not curse them (Romans 12:14), to care for their enemies by providing them with food and drink (12:20), and to pay their taxes and obey all earthly governments (13:1-7). He mentioned giving all his belongings to feed the hungry (I Corinthians 13:3), and taught giving to the person in need (Ephesians 4:23). He told his followers it was wrong to take their conflicts before non-Christian courts rather than before the saints. (I Corinthians 6:1)

Paul taught that "it is good for a man not to touch a woman," i.e., it is best to be celibate, but because of prevailing immoralities, marriage is acceptable. Divorce is permissible in the case of an unbeliever demanding separation. (I Corinthians 7) Paul repeatedly attacked sexual immorality. "This is God's will--your sanctification, that you keep yourselves from sexual immorality, that each of you learn how to take his own wife in purity and honor, not in lustful passion like the gentiles who have no knowledge of God." (I Thessalonians 4:3-5) Paul told his followers not to associate with sexually immoral people (I Corinthians 5:9-12, 6:15,18). He condemned homosexuality (Romans 1:24-27) and incest (I Corinthians 5:1).

"Make no mistake," warned Paul, "no fornicator or idolater, none who are guilty either of adultery or of homosexual perversion, no thieves or grabbers or drunkards or slanderers or swindlers, will possess the kingdom of God." (I Corinthians 6:9-10 [NEB])

Paul condemned wickedness, immorality, depravity, greed, murder, quarreling, deceit, malignity, gossip, slander, insolence, pride (Romans 1:29-30), drunkenness, carousing, debauchery, jealousy (Romans 13:13), sensuality, magic arts, animosities, bad temper, selfishness, dissensions, envy (Galatians 5:19-21; greediness (Ephesians 4:19; Colossians 3:5), foul speech, anger, clamor, abusive language, malice (Ephesians 4:29-32), dishonesty (Colossians 3:13), materialism (I Timothy 6:6-11), conceit, avarice, boasting and treachery. (II Timothy 3:2-4)

Paul told the gentiles to train themselves for godliness, to practice self-control and lead upright, godly lives (Galatians 5:23; I Timothy 4:7; II Timothy 1:7; Titus 2:11-12). He instructed them to ALWAYS pray constantly. (I Thessalonians 5:17)

Paul praised love, joy, peace, kindness, generosity, fidelity and gentleness (Galatians 5:22-23). He told his followers to conduct themselves with humility and gentleness (Ephesians 4:2), to speak to one another in psalms and hymns; to sing heartily and make music to the Lord. (Ephesians 5:19; Colossians 3:16)

Paul wrote further that women should cover their heads while worshiping, and that long hair on males is dishonorable. (I Corinthians 11:5-14) According to Paul, Christian women are to dress modestly and prudently, and are not to be adorned with braided hair, gold or pearls or expensive clothes. (I Timothy 2:9)

My problem really isn't with Christians unable to follow Paul, but with the hypocrisy of saying "I believe," and then ignoring the rest of what their religion dictates when it suits them. Why not just be secular, like everyone else?

It's my contention all of us (Christians included!) really live in a secular society; Americans merely pay lip service to religious ideals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why only the last 20 years?
Posted by: RuthDBWalker on Jun 27, 2009 2:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why was John McCain given a free pass (from the public and the pundits) for his terrible marrital behavior? Is it negated after 20 years? (I've been divorced for more than 30 years, so maybe now I'm considered a virgin again?)

Sure, McCain admitted it, but so have the guys these days. Why aren't the commentators saying that it doesn't make any difference, because just look at John McCain?

http://marriage.about.com/od/politics/p/johnmccaincarol.htm

See also The Guardian 2008/jul/11, latimes.com 2008/jul/11, nytimes.com 2008/10/18

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THERE REALLY IS AN ETHICAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN REPUBS AND DEMS...
Posted by: blurider on Jun 27, 2009 4:46 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in these matters, usually!

Forgetting the 'Sunday School morality' judgments, forgetting the seamy sex for a moment and speaking in fairly broad generalities, Republican scandals tend to a much higher degree to scream hypocrisy, to involve a measure of malfeasance or betrayal of the standards of ethical governance and often enough, even downright thievery.

True there are very randy Democrats. What would you expect from 'liberals'? They're more sexually liberated, less prone to confuse ethics with 'morality'. They may occasionally forget that a promise is a promise but it's usually about libido not greed and while that might be hurtful to the spouses and families it's not betrayal on a national scale. It's not malfeasance or a betrayal of election promises and it's seldom a betrayal that harms the national psyche unless and until the other side of the political equation screams like a scalded pup, demanding very public retribution.

That was Eleanor Clift's point of reference when she said Governor Sanford should step down. She was much less offended by his sexual adventure than by the week of unexplained, un-arranged absence from his responsibilities and the evident theft of taxpayer monies.

Since we and they are all human it was clearly more common sensical when we kept our judgment of those two areas of life compartmentalized. Then, the occasional figure who couldn't keep it in is pants but could keep his fingers out of the till was of no great cause for alarm. It was between him and his priest, his spouse or his family. He likely hadn't been railing on the week before he was exposed, about family values, the wickedness of homosexuality, the sanctity of marriage or the very 'ownership' of that word by his goody-two-shoes, class!

Not so strangely, many fewer of those men presumed to be the national preacher or anything else they couldn't live up to!

It's true that Clinton misbehaved with an underling, (no pun intended) even an intern, but an intern who made it very plain that she was seeking such activity, well in advance - remember the 'presidential kneepads' remark? It's also true that he was consciously cornered and forced into a predictable lie - about a matter separate from governance - and then that 'lie' became the very charge against him. A good Republican lawyer would have called that a political 'fishing expedition'!

Spitzer's peccadillos left him open to charges of hypocrisy but have we forgotten the coincidence of his other campaign to expose the problems already brewing in the banking industry? Given how poorly that cover-up worked, Spitzer's exposure was nothing more than a sad, side note, bad luck politically and a tic in a non-stoppable scandal which, unpopular as he might've been he was merely an observer to.

It's true that Spitzer and both Clinton and Kennedy betrayed their first ladies but it's also true that their first ladies all chose to forgive and stand by them. Kennedy's forgiveness was likely pre-arranged. Generalizing once more, gay Democrats are openly gay, straying Dem officials aren't usually tainted by ethics issues alongside their affairs and many more of conservative officials who 'play' are notable for the hypocrisy of their behavior in relation to their pretense and their preaching.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How about Gannongate?
Posted by: saadasim on Jun 27, 2009 5:28 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't bringing in a S&M homosexual prostitute for sleep overs without security clearance supposed to be a problem?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

dolphin
Posted by: dolphin on Jun 27, 2009 6:47 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is time that we return morality to its rightful place. It is not just about sex.We have a government that is bought by lobbyists and a system that allows people to lie and still be rewarded. The morality of today seems to be, "That whatever you do as long as you make a profit at it , it is O.K." We have to get back to truth, caring for one another and a government for the people, by the people and of the people. Politicians that aren't willing to play by those rules should not be elected to office.It is time to say that the price for holding office is honesty!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BOB DOLE
Posted by: fg on Jun 27, 2009 7:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wasn't Bob Dole the first to put erectile DYSfunction on the map? I guess he's the exception that proves the rule n'est-ce pas.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Democrats are no angels either
Posted by: LeonBNJ on Jun 27, 2009 7:47 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Democrats are no angels either, just as many will or may be involved in sexual affairs that counterdict their political views.
Former Democrate NJ Gov. McGreevey was weak as to supporting civil unions in NJ and was long before Governor known to be a bisexual and active in seeking sexual activity with men. He was married twice with women, and fathered children with each of them. Defenitely a hyprocrit and a Democrat.
Former NYS Gov. Spitzer was a Attorney General of the State of NY and as AG voted to uphold the law including on prostitution. He had been married for years. Spitzer also went after Wall Street, AIG, big corp corruption and consumer abuse long before he got caught with seeing prostitutes and one has to wonder if he got set up to be caught by some he was going after.
Sexual affairs by married government officials are counter to being a responsible public servant and hyprocrtical to their duty to follow the law. That is a problem no matter which party they are with.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Suppose you can give us Posted by: TruthBeTold
Unholy repubs
Posted by: TruthBeTold on Jun 27, 2009 8:52 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.republicanoffenders.com/index.html

List needs to be updated with:
- John Ensign
- Mark Sanford
- John McCain

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Henry Hyde missed this list?
Posted by: chaztmac on Jun 28, 2009 2:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another member of the sanctimonious pile-on of the Clinton years. I seem to remember that it was revealed he had boinked a women other than his wife. She was married and it lasted nine years. And that was excused as a "youthful" indiscretion. At 40?!

It was the ex who spent six months trying to get the MSM press on the scent. Even the woman spoke out against Hyde after his lame excuse.

I refreshed my details at a Salon and WaPo article at the time. And found this nugget; "Two leading Clinton critics, Reps. Dan Burton (R-Ind.) and Helen Chenoweth (R-Idaho), have acknowledged extramarital affairs in the last two weeks after being confronted by newspapers in their states." (WaPo) So, that adds three to the list of Rethug Clinton-bashing pompus asses. And to answer a buried post that looked forward to a future female legislator scandal, there you have a Rethug woman already called out ten+ years ago.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OH yeah
Posted by: AAWeeble3 on Jun 28, 2009 6:11 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
LOL, they have had some real doozies haven't they? LOL

RT
Absolute Anonymity

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Henry Hyde should be on list ,Strom Thurmond (perhaps) too Lukens
Posted by: whealeydj on Jun 28, 2009 6:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Strom Thurmond was a Dixiecrat and very young man when he fathered a child with a black maid. He might not count as Republican sex scandal but he switched to Republicans when they embraced the Southern strategy (aka pandering to Southern white racism) in 1964. Also the EXTREME hypocrisy of 70 year political career built on racism while having a hidden black child puts him on the list in my book. The real question is why do to Democrats resign like Mcgreevey and Spitzer but Republicans like Vitter, Ensign, Hyde, Craig and Sandford (so far) stay the course? Also not on the list but some Ohioans remember Rep. Lukens who was cited for frequenting an underage prostitute in mid 1990s.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

lest we forget
Posted by: pms515 on Jun 28, 2009 10:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does anyone remember Dick Morris and his prostitutes?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

don't forget Dubya's jungle fever
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Jun 28, 2009 1:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the only prescription was more Condi! ;)

#@!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SO WHAT?????? Don't forget, this is a
Posted by: SamFox on Jun 28, 2009 6:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
two way street.

I bet the Dems were left out because their sexual compromises would take up too much space.

How many of these clowns drowned their honey pie partner after driving drunk off a bridge???

I like the 1st reply at the top. It's a long way down from the high horse.

All this article does is reinforce the contention that BOTH parties are corrupt. The Dems do have a longer historical list of all kinds of transgressions of this & other sorts. They opposed freeing the slaves for starters. Now the Repubs seem to be scrambling to catch the corrupt Dems.

Both 'parties' are losing members to the independent movement. That's why Taxed Enough Already groups are made up of former Repubs AND Dems.

If the goal is to preserve the favorite 'party' at all costs, then the USA will go down the toilet. If the goal is to restore the USA to a great nation, reduce the size & power of the Fed gov, it's time to leave both the corrupt 'parties' & go independent.

I for one am tired of the phony, staged, see saw battle, controlled opposition it's called, as the D's & R's try to fool us into thinking they are the answer. Neither 'party saws much about getting back to original intent Constitutional law. That is a very BAD thing!!

SamFox

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Letter from a former Demacrate, now former Republican Part 1
Posted by: SamFox on Jun 28, 2009 6:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The lady who wrote this was on Glenn Beck's show. You can check that. Here goes.

(Start)

GLENN: I got a letter from a woman in Arizona. She writes an open letter to our nation's leadership: I'm a home grown American citizen, 53, registered Democrat all my life. Before the last presidential election I registered as a Republican because I no longer felt the Democratic Party represents my views or works to pursue issues important to me. Now I no longer feel the Republican Party represents my views or works to pursue issues important to me. The fact is I no longer feel any political party or representative in Washington represents my views or works to pursue the issues important to me. There must be someone. Please tell me who you are. Please stand up and tell me that you are there and that you're willing to fight for our Constitution as it was written. Please stand up now. You might ask yourself what my views and issues are that I would horribly feel so disenfranchised by both major political parties. What kind of nut job am I? Will you please tell me?

Well, these are briefly my views and issues for which I seek representation:

One, illegal immigration. I want you to stop coddling illegal immigrants and secure our borders. Close the underground tunnels. Stop the violence and the trafficking in drugs and people. No amnesty, not again. Been there, done that, no resolution. P.S., I'm not a racist. This isn't to be confused with legal immigration.

Two, the TARP bill, I want it repealed and I want no further funding supplied to it. We told you no, but you did it anyway. I want the remaining unfunded 95% repealed. Freeze, repeal.

Three: Czars, I want the circumvention of our checks and balances stopped immediately. Fire the czars. No more czars. Government officials answer to the process, not to the president. Stop trampling on our Constitution and honor it.

Four, cap and trade. The debate on global warming is not over. There is more to say.

Five, universal healthcare. I will not be rushed into another expensive decision. Don't you dare try to pass this in the middle of the night and then go on break. Slow down!

Six, growing government control. I want states rights and sovereignty fully restored. I want less government in my life, not more. Shrink it down. Mind your own business. You have enough to take care of with your real obligations. Why don't you start there.

Seven, ACORN. I do not want ACORN and its affiliates in charge of our 2010 census. I want them investigated. I also do not want mandatory escrow fees contributed to them every time on every real estate deal that closes. Stop the funding to ACORN and its affiliates pending impartial audits and investigations. I do not trust them with taking the census over with our taxpayer money. I don't trust them with our taxpayer money. Face up to the allegations against them and get it resolved before taxpayers get any more involved with them. If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, hello. Stop protecting your political buddies. You work for us, the people. Investigate.

Part 2 coming

SamFox

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Letter from a former Demacrate, now former Republican Part 2
Posted by: SamFox on Jun 28, 2009 6:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Eight, redistribution of wealth. No, no, no. I work for my money. It is mine. I have always worked for people with more money than I have because they gave me jobs. That is the only redistribution of wealth that I will support. I never got a job from a poor person. Why do you want me to hate my employers? Why ‑‑ what do you have against shareholders making a profit?

Nine, charitable contributions. Although I never got a job from a poor person, I have helped many in need. Charity belongs in our local communities, where we know our needs best and can use our local talent and our local resources. Butt out, please. We want to do it ourselves.

Ten, corporate bailouts. Knock it off. Sink or swim like the rest of us. If there are hard times ahead, we'll be better off just getting into it and letting the strong survive. Quick and painful. Have you ever ripped off a Band‑Aid? We will pull together. Great things happen in America under great hardship. Give us the chance to innovate. We cannot disappoint you more than you have disappointed us.

Eleven, transparency and accountability. How about it? No, really, how about it? Let's have it. Let's say we give the buzzwords a rest and have some straight honest talk. Please try ‑‑ please stop manipulating and trying to appease me with clever wording. I am not the idiot you obviously take me for. Stop sneaking around and meeting in back rooms making deals with your friends. It will only be a prelude to your criminal investigation. Stop hiding things from me.

Twelve, unprecedented quick spending. Stop it now.

Take a breath. Listen to the people. Let's just slow down and get some input from some nonpoliticians on the subject. Stop making everything an emergency. Stop speed reading our bills into law. I am not an activist. I am not a community organizer. Nor am I a terrorist, a militant or a violent person. I am a parent and a grandparent. I work. I'm busy. I'm busy. I am busy, and I am tired. I thought we elected competent people to take care of the business of government so that we could work, raise our families, pay our bills, have a little recreation, complain about taxes, endure our hardships, pursue our personal goals, cut our lawn, wash our cars on the weekends and be responsible contributing members of society and teach our children to be the same all while living in the home of the free and land of the brave.

I entrusted you with upholding the Constitution. I believed in the checks and balances to keep from getting far off course. What happened? You are very far off course. Do you really think I find humor in the hiring of a speed reader to unintelligently ramble all through a bill that you signed into law without knowing what it contained? I do not. It is a mockery of the responsibility I have entrusted to you. It is a slap in the face. I am not laughing at your arrogance. Why is it that I feel as if you would not trust me to make a single decision about my own life and how I would live it but you should expect that I should trust you with the debt that you have laid on all of us and our children. We did not want the TARP bill. We said no. We would repeal it if we could. I am sure that we still cannot. There is such urgency and recklessness in all of the recent spending.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Letter from a former Demacrate, now former Republican Part 3
Posted by: SamFox on Jun 28, 2009 6:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From my perspective, it seems that all of you have gone insane. I also know that I am far from alone in these feelings. Do you honestly feel that your current pursuits have merit to patriotic Americans? We want it to stop. We want to put the brakes on everything that is being rushed by us and forced upon us. We want our voice back. You have forced us to put our lives on hold to straighten out the mess that you are making. We will have to give up our vacations, our time spent with our children, any relaxation time we may have had and money we cannot afford to spend on you to bring our concerns to Washington. Our president often knows all the right buzzword is unsustainable. Well, no kidding. How many tens of thousands of dollars did the focus group cost to come up with that word? We don't want your overpriced words. Stop treating us like we're morons.

We want all of you to stop focusing on your reelection and do the job we want done, not the job you want done or the job your party wants done. You work for us and at this rate I guarantee you not for long because we are coming. We will be heard and we will be represented. You think we're so busy with our lives that we will never come for you? We are the formerly silent majority, all of us who quietly work , pay taxes, obey the law, vote, save money, keep our noses to the grindstone and we are now looking up at you. You have awakened us, the patriotic spirit so strong and so powerful that it had been sleeping too long. You have pushed us too far. Our numbers are great. They may surprise you. For every one of us who will be there, there will be hundreds more that could not come. Unlike you, we have their trust. We will represent them honestly, rest assured. They will be at the polls on voting day to usher you out of office. We have cancelled vacations. We will use our last few dollars saved. We will find the representation among us and a grassroots campaign will flourish. We didn't ask for this fight. But the gloves are coming off. We do not come in violence, but we are angry. You will represent us or you will be replaced with someone who will. There are candidates among us when hewill rise like a Phoenix from the ashes that you have made of our constitution.

Democrat, Republican, independent, libertarian. Understand this. We don't care. Political parties are meaningless to us. Patriotic Americans are willing to do right by us and our Constitution and that is all that matters to us now. We are going to fire all of you who abuse power and seek more. It is not your power. It is ours and we want it back. We entrusted you with it and you abused it. You are dishonorable. You are dishonest. As Americans we are ashamed of you. You have brought shame to us. If you are not representing the wants and needs of your constituency loudly and consistently, in spite of the objections of your party, you will be fired. Did you hear? We no longer care about your political parties. You need to be loyal to us, not to them. Because we will get you fired and they will not save you. If you do or can represent me, my issues, my views, please stand up. Make your identity known. You need to make some noise about it. Speak up. I need to know who you are. If you do not speak up, you will be herded out with the rest of the sheep and we will replace the whole damn congress if need be one by one. We are coming. Are we coming for you? Who do you represent? What do you represent? Listen. Because we are coming. We the people are coming. (End of letter)

It's NOT about bashing each other. It's about saving the USA for all of us!! We can work out diffs if we stay free. If Obama & his pals win, we ALL lose!! Bov will control every part of our lives. Investigate Cap & Trade.

SamFox

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rev. Gary Aldridge wins! Not a politician, but a fundie conservative should count, no?
Posted by: nunsuch on Jun 28, 2009 7:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"2007 OCTOBER 8--An Alabama minister who died in June of "accidental mechanical asphyxia" was found hogtied and wearing two complete wet suits, including a face mask, diving gloves and slippers, rubberized underwear, and a head mask, according to an autopsy report.

"Investigators determined that Rev. Gary Aldridge's death was not caused by foul play and that the 51-year-old pastor of Montgomery's Thorington Road Baptist Church was alone in his home at the time he died (while apparently in the midst of some autoerotic undertaking). While the Montgomery Advertiser, which first obtained the autopsy records, reported on Aldridge's two wet suits, the family newspaper chose not to mention what police discovered inside the minister's rubber briefs."

How in a world can you beat that?
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/64828

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This guy should be on the list
Posted by: Captain Liberty on Jun 28, 2009 7:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
W. David Hager--beloved OB-GYN from Kentucky, the man who President Bush wanted to appoint to an essential role in the FDA, the man who refuses to dispense various forms of birth control to his patients because it offends his moral values. One problem. He raped his wife repeatedly. He raped her anally -- sometimes while she was under medication to treat her narcolepsy. The man buggered his wife while she slept.

I hope he at least used lube.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Joe the Plumber
Posted by: fred_53_99 on Jun 29, 2009 5:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is it me or does the name "joe The Plumber" sound like a porn star? i know a number of folks in my city (Cleveland Ohio) who thought a first thats what he was. I mean if your gonna work in the sex industry he 's got a gteat name and he's a Republican so he has a lot of pent up sexual frustrion. " Joe the Plumber he knows how to lay some pipe" This guy could be a gold mine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How Dare You Forget Rep. Bob Allen?
Posted by: stagolee on Jun 29, 2009 12:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How can you forget the Republican with the fear-driven interracial oral fixation?

That was one of the best. ;)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SO YA GOTTA BE PERFECT TO BE 4 MORALS???
Posted by: reelman on Jun 29, 2009 3:47 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
KOOK LIB POSTER ALERT

1. Profanity is very common (replaces logic or class)
2. Uses personal insults when challenged (replaces logic or class)
3. Changes the subject
4. Fails to answer the challenge
5. Points at other bad behavior to excuse theirs or their Party’s
6. Often makes serial fact-less assertions
7. Has no sense of history
8. Is really not interested in depth or “why” questions
9. Is usually angry and sarcastic (replaces logic or class)
10. Runs away or has a verbal fit when nailed with facts
11. Sincerely believes you are stupid to reject secular socialism

By these you shall know the common kook liberal who offers online discussion nothing but a place to vent lifelong anger…

SERIAL ADULTERERS LIKE KLINTON AND JK...GAME, SET, MATCH

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Spitzer was different
Posted by: ccurtis on Jun 29, 2009 7:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can folks please get real about the “hypocrisy” of Elliot Spitzer? Love him or hate him, Spitzer tried to curb sex trafficking. Good for him. A high end hooker going to a nice hotel to have consensual sex with a man of her choosing is much different than a trafficked woman being raped by a string of johns/rapists every day and night at some useless pimps whim.

Spitzer was dishonest to his family, but there is no known reason to put him in the same category as someone who visits a brothel where trafficked women and girls are held captive and subject to mass rape.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not even a word about the Franklin scandal and coverup?
Posted by: xbj on Jun 30, 2009 7:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What the GOP in the 80's had to do with Michael Jackson.

And what even Kubrick couldn't show in "Eyes Wide Shut".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

media corps very successful to keep Arnold out of picture
Posted by: ZeeBruce on Jun 30, 2009 6:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The tabloids that normally would have had a field day with the many women charging sexual harassment by Arnold Schwarzenegger but for the fact that the corporation that owns them was planning a new series of books on body building by guess who and they did not want to derail the investment they were making. Somehow sexual harassment is OK so long as it is by someone preaching family values and low taxes and less government, something Arnold has failed in equal measure to demonstrate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TIM HUTCHINSON
Posted by: CLARENCE SWINNEY on Jul 5, 2009 7:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
SINATOR TIM

LAY BAPTIST MINISTER
APARTMENT SHARED WITH BROTHER

APARTMENT NEIGHBORS KNEW HIS AIDE SLEPT WITH HIM.

LEFT FAMILY AND MARRIED HIS SHACK JOB

HOME FREE.

cswinney2@triad.rr.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

fishbait
Posted by: CLARENCE SWINNEY on Jul 5, 2009 7:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
book by fishbait miller Keeper of The Do to House of Rep.

House of Ill Repute.

Rep hired shack jobs for offices.

Go back and get Reagan
shotgun marriage
shacked up with love of life while Nancy in hospital giving birth to Patsy.

Nancy "best BJ in Hollywood" per Peter Lawford in book "Peter Lawford"

SEX WINS EVERY TIME

cover the body do not promote it

burka burka burka
praise allah

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement