Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Yes He Can, But Will He? Obama Hesitates to Make the Tough Calls

By Robert Kuttner, Huffington Post. Posted May 26, 2009.


Obama doesn't lack leadership or nerve, which makes his dithering on the financial crisis and straddling on torture all the more bewildering.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

This week, we learned that President Obama really is capable of political courage and idealism, as well as calculation. The question is how he will apply these gifts to the financial crisis as well as to issues closer to both his heart and to the strengths of his intellect, such as defense of the Constitution.

Each of his major speeches of the past week was a tour de force. At Notre Dame he spoke candidly and movingly about reproductive rights and tolerance. His quest for common ground won repeated applause from this largely Catholic audience, some of whom evidently are less dogmatic than their church's leaders. Said Obama:

So let us work together to reduce the number of women seeking abortions, let's reduce unintended pregnancies. (Applause.) Let's make adoption more available. (Applause.) Let's provide care and support for women who do carry their children to term. (Applause.) Let's honor the conscience of those who disagree with abortion, and draft a sensible conscience clause, and make sure that all of our health care policies are grounded not only in sound science, but also in clear ethics, as well as respect for the equality of women." Those are things we can do. (Applause.)

At Annapolis, he sounded as resolutely committed to national defense as any chicken hawk, and rather more serious about what true national security entails -- and he got repeated ovations from the midshipmen, among them John McCain IV.

Speaking in the Rose Garden on Friday about credit card abuses, Obama signed a bill that takes a small step on behalf of consumers to prohibit the most extreme of bait-and-switch tactics. The President said, "Statements will be required to tell credit card holders how long it will take to pay off a balance and what it will cost in interest if they only make the minimum monthly payments. We also put a stop to retroactive rate hikes that appear on a bill suddenly with no rhyme or reason." Credit card abuses are the easiest to remedy of the financial scandals, but Obama was on the right side of the issue and in good form.

It was his major address Thursday at the National Archives, with America's most sacred documents as backdrop, that was Obama at his most thoughtful and eloquent, as well as brave. "I have studied the Constitution as a student;" he declared, "I have taught it as a teacher; I have been bound by it as a lawyer and legislator. I took an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution as Commander-in-Chief, and as a citizen, I know that we must never -- ever -- turn our back on its enduring principles for expedience sake."

Obama stuck to his decision to close the prison at Guantanamo, just a day after the Senate, by a vote of 94-6, denied him the funds to shift detainees, out of concern that alleged terrorists would be instead locked up in maximum security prisons in the continental United States, possibly to escape or might someday be released into American communities. It's an absurd worry, yet where to house terrorists is for most legislators the ultimate NIMBY issue.

Obama himself muddied the waters in his insistence that he planned to keep detainees in "prolonged detention," just not at Guantanamo. That, in turn, created the sense that Obama's insistence about shutting down the prison was more about symbolism than constitutional substance.

His rather complex position provided fodder for critics on both the right and the left. Dick Cheney appointed himself to make a quasi-official response, in an unrepentant speech defending torture. I suppose we are fortunate that the faces of today's Republican Party are Cheney and Rush Limbaugh, guaranteeing that the Republicans will stay around 30 percent of the electorate. On the other hand, it is odd that Obama would seize on the symbolism of Guantanamo as abhorrent and inconsistent with American values while insisting that "prolonged detention" without trial for accused terrorists could be justified. In a letter sent Friday to the president, Sen. Russ Feingold warned that "such detention is a hallmark of abusive systems that we have historically criticized around the world."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: foreign policy, guantanamo, barack obama, john mccain, notre dame, naval academy, obama commencement addres

Robert Kuttner is co-editor of The American Prospect and a senior fellow at Demos. His recent book is Obama's Challenge.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Politics! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
We Didn't Know Jack
Posted by: Revolutionary (Direct) Democracy on May 26, 2009 12:22 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama's track record as President and the company he keeps are both increasingly damning.

In the event that he turns out to be a stealth neocon wouldn't it be great to have a way to fire him?

A Vote of Confidence Amendment will give American voters the power to dismiss any elected official at any time.

VOCA, Now !!

FREE AMERICA

REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He's Already Made His Big Move, You Big Liberal Dummy
Posted by: jooljetkmae on May 26, 2009 12:29 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He's escalated the U.S. led aggression in Afghanistan. A campaign promise, which didn't seem to be noticed by his liberal base back during the campaign, that he has actually kept.

There is nothing more pathetic than all the liberal sheep hanging on pins and needles out there waiting for Obama to do something to the left of Bush. It ain't happening unless the people who voted for him force him to do it.

What do so many liberals out there see in this guy?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bring Back Reverend Wright
Posted by: DrBrian on May 26, 2009 1:01 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, he can, but no, he won't. He has brains, but conscience, judgment and courage are lacking. The only issue on which he has been truly progressive is abortion rights. If he'd give Rahm Emanuel the boot and bring in Reverend Wright we'd have a better country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bring Back Reverend Wright Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
The Obamanator
Posted by: Perry Logan on May 26, 2009 2:52 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The spinelessness and moral cowardice of the Obama administration know no bounds."
--Willem Buiter, Finanacial Times

Mr. Kuttner is suffering from a bad case of cognitive dissonance. Obama's courage and idealism exist only in his imagination.

I think Obama is President largely because a group of Democrats hate the Clintons. This became clear during the primaries, when the Obama supporters acted like rabid weasels.

Of course, Clinton-haters are the scum of the earth. They will destroy any party they're in, and--despite appearances--they have destroyed the Democrats.



Da Banksta

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama works for the same people as Bush, the same people who brought us 9/11.
Posted by: pfgetty on May 26, 2009 2:51 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until we solve 9/11, and find out exactly how it was done and even who wanted it done, we will continue to have leaders who work for the same people that wanted it done.
We will continue with the imperial illegal wars, expansion of our military, use of torture and rendition, slashing our protections as citizens under the Constitution, and the rest.
Obama is different from Bush, but the goals are the same.
The way it is done will change, but it is mandatory that more control will be secured in regions of the world with the resources we need, like the Middle East.
And we will have to work for the security of Israel, whatever that entails.

It is now so easy to prove that 9/11 was an inside job. The work has been done, the evidence staring us in the face. Great and brave Americans have written about it all, made DVD's, produced scientific papers, done the interviews, found the old forgotten news reports..............we have what we need to be sure that our leadership planned, executed, and then covered up 9/11.
Those that desperately try to stop the move toward a new investigation, who have thwarted all the efforts, blocked the press from reporting the truth, should be looked at as co-conspirators. Those that have kept Alternet from doing its responsible job of reporting 9/11 truth should be held suspect of the highest treason ever.
I don't know what group these people come from or what is their goals, although I have my suspicions, but I think of them as every bit as evil as Bush/Cheyney.
We knew, as our founding fathers told us, that once we no longer closely watched our leaders and let them act behind secrecy as we do, we would invite tyrrany. It has happened. The fourth estate, the press, was supposed to protect us from tyrrany by reporting to the American people all that our leaders do. We no longer have that. Our media is in bed with the same groups that support tyrrany.

Exposing 9/11 will end all of that, if we can just get the word out.
But Americans do not believe ANYTHING unless it is told to them by trusted people in the media. So we have to build enough of a movement to embarrass those media personalities to begin presenting 9/11 truth. I don't know just how we can, as we have a formidable foe.............those like GuitarBill, who seems to want to work tirelessly to keep the truth from spreading.

But we must do what we can.
And here, we must ensure that Alternet one day will finally do the responsible and honest thing and present the facts and evidence of 9/11.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
he has eight years of Bush-Cheney-Limbaugh hysteria and fear-mongering to overcome
Posted by: Suzon on May 26, 2009 3:07 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The American people (including many of those who tend to vote) were subjected to a constant barrage of "terrist" propaganda during W's (improperly-obtained) time in office.

Fortunately, it is impossible to sustain any single emotion for very long. Fear does eventually wear off.

We must not forget that the entire military-industrial establishment makes its obscene profits from the idea that there are zillions of enemies who are out to get us, even though we are hard to beat when it comes to actual state-sponsored terrorism and torture.

If Obama is the intelligent teacher he seems to be, he will know that it is best when people decide for themselves just what is right and just.

He appears to be trying to calm down the induced hysteria which can only be a good thing. Going in with all guns blazing--haven't we had far too much of that already?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama is a Pawn
Posted by: obamapawn on May 26, 2009 4:06 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama is not confused. He knows exactly what he is doing and who he is doing it for. Guess what. It is not for the good of the everyday person in this country.
If you look at the people he has appointed to take care of the financial crisis, they are the very people who created it.The purpose of his appointments is to cover up the real cause of the financial meltdown and to make the severity of the meltdown not look as bad as it is.
People have already forgotten about making Bush and Cheney accountable for their treason, mass murder, war crimes and financial fraud.
Go to 911insidejob.netfor many articles and videos.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama bin Lyin
Posted by: JDutty6 on May 26, 2009 5:28 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only things Obama has proven himself good at is one, giving speeches and two, giving our money away!

RT
Privacy Center

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Senator Russ Feingold in 2012?
Posted by: blondesprite on May 26, 2009 5:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look at his voting record and remember he, Kucinich, and a few others have repeatedly tried to hold the Bush Admin accountable.
Write to Feingold, ask him to run against Obama.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obams's leadership
Posted by: Alfred di Genis on May 26, 2009 5:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Kuttner says that Obama "doesn't lack leadership or courage," yet neither one has ever been in evidence. Obama's first 100 days looked a lot like George Bush's last 100 days.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Do You Really Want an Imperial Presidency?
Posted by: eyendall on May 26, 2009 6:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As someone who is left on some things, right on some others and down the center on the rest, i.e. a self-proclaimed sensible, thinking citizen, I am struck by the line taken by many on the left that Obama should bulldoze ahead and just proclaim their agenda. Surely that was the essential criticism of Bush that he did just that, failing to build coalitions and build support i.e. the essence of politics. Having a personal belief or opinion, believing that that opinion is right for the country, and judging that it can be accomplished are all quite different things. The biggest problem Obama has is the Democratic Party in Congress. He can't depend on them and can move only as fast as they permit. He also needs some Republican support to compensate for right-wing or intimidated Democrats. He can bully and cajole but he has to choose his fights and establish priorities. A rhetorical President who continually loses the legislative arguments is both ineffective and incompetent. If he has to go slowly on gay rights in the military or compromise on releasing torture pictures in order to preserve a more important agenda like health care reform then so be it. That is what governance, as opposed to advocacy, is all about. One man can't do it alone, thank god, or you are left with the imperial presidency. Checks and balances can be inefficient and frustrating but they are there for a reason.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Lack the Bowels to Shoot Thee
Posted by: Lilly on May 26, 2009 6:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When Colin Powell couldn't stand up to Bush and Rumsfeld, I kept thinking of the scene in Moby Dick where First Mate Starbuck has realized that insane Captain Ahab, in his quest for vengeance against the whale that bit Ahab's leg off, is on the way to sinking the ship and drowning the whole crew. Starbuck, a Quaker and a man of calm courage, decides that killing Ahab is justified because it is the only way to save the ship. So he goes up to the bridge and raises his gun but he can't bring himself to pull the trigger. He lowers the gun and mutters to himself, "Now clearly I see my miserable office, to obey rebelling, because I lack the bowels to shoot thee."

At the time, I wondered how much of Powell's impotence was due to a lifetime of millitary obedience and how much to a lifetime of being a black man in a white world. And now I wonder the same---the latter half, anyway---about Obama. If he is trying to win over Republicans by taking centrist positions, it's not working---just look on townhall.com, which is a feeding frenzy of Obama-hatred every day. And Obama's kissing up to the Right seems to be escalating---first the financial business, but now accommodating Cheneyesque policies re war and prisoners.

For me the Supreme Court appointment will be a flashpoint. If Obama appoints a Conservative to try and curry favor with his masters, I will be marking next Election Day on my calendar as an occasion of staying in bed all day, reading novels and eating bonbons.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» all true, but Posted by: RegK
As long as Emanuel/Likud infects
Posted by: weathered on May 26, 2009 6:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the oval office, Barak the narcissist will remain a compliant voice box of the selfish, the greedy and the Ugly - and its MSM/PBS/NPR's job to keep it that way.

'by deceit we wage war'

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama's Need to Act Boldly
Posted by: mivince79 on May 26, 2009 6:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What Obama needs is what FDR had--a Harry Hopkins (former social worker!). When someone criticized the New Deal's actions to Hopkins with remarks about the need for "long run" planning, Hopkins famously replied:"People don't eat in the long run." What Obama needs, in other words is another Obama. People are hurting out here. Relief is not coming fast enough. The President has to shed his overly deferential attitudes toward Wall Street. He, and we the people, would be better served if he displayed some of the "brass" that Teddy
Roosevelt and cousin Franklin and JFK showed big business. Economic Royalists all! Mr. President, listen to your inner social worker, your Harry Hopkins. (Certainly not Harry Reid--but that's another tragic story.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Democrats are the piss that "sets" the cloth
Posted by: chlamor on May 26, 2009 6:47 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Romans built dye shops with vats outside that served as free public toilets. Not only did they act as your basic "rest area" for passersby, but the urine was used to "set" cloth that had been recently dyed - the same way that vinegar is sometimes used today with natural dyes.

So too the Democratic Party. Since FDR, the move of the Democratic Party toward Social Democracy was stillborn; a casualty of McCarthyism which was as much a Democratic Party invention as it was anyone else's. The old coalition, such as it was, essentially fell apart under Kennedy and LBJ. Since Nixon, the "modern" form of the two party system has emerged.

Each Republican president dyes the political fabric a deeper shade of reactionary brown, and each succeeding Democratic president pisses on the new shade to set the color. Thus with Carter, Clinton, and now, Obama.

All of it is maintained through the ambiguity of middle-classdom and the rest, but people can be forgiven for thinking that the shirts are increasingly brown, all talk not withstanding, and that the whole scheme reeks of piss.

Of course the Romans used various scents to mask the process. Our assholes call it the smell of success and don't even bother with perfumes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

People
Posted by: JefffromCA on May 26, 2009 7:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seem to forget that Obama is really just a little bit to the left of "former" Goldwater Girl Hillary Clinton. The only liberal Democrat who ran for the nomination in 2008 was Mr. Kucinich. Elected officials tend to move toward the center as the campaign progresses and during their terms. Even Bush. (He did not publicly burn the Constitution) This is not unexpected, just saddening. I plan to continue writing to him and my representative and senators and state representatives, working locally and thinking globally. He's still got 3 years and 6 months, 87%, of his first term left and the former resident of 1600 left a lot to undo.

George Bush now walks Barney and cleans up after him. Now he knows a little bit about how Obama feels.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't forget his equivocation on the drugs issue
Posted by: fapper on May 26, 2009 7:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe I overestimated the relative power of the presidency in the 3 branch system. Perhaps he cannot do anything about even the most egregious harms of the drug war (herbicide use in other countries, US Ambassadors threatening legitimate local governments in other countries, prisons overflowing with people with drug problems, 4th ammendment gone, etc.). But he needs to start speaking about it even if he cannot change it.
If even Obama in whom I had so much hope, does not at least speak out against the drug war and instead goes along with the "program" then the political system will not work to resolve this issue. It is hard to believe that our sytem will not correct such a gross failure.
We need to do our part still. Money needs to be found to allow prosecuted individuals (non violent) to go to a full trial on drug charges. No more plea bargains on this stuff. We are doing this to ourselves partially by complying with the system and not utilizing our rights to a jury of our peers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What do so many liberals out there see in this guy?
Posted by: motamanx6 on May 26, 2009 7:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Answer: He is not George W Bush, he can speak in real sentences that one can understand.

That said, I deplore Obama's foray into Afghanistan. I thought he read history more incisively than he apparently has.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PRESSURE IS COMING ONLY FROM OBAMA'S RIGHT
Posted by: Roger Bybee225 on May 26, 2009 8:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama's "dithering," as Bob Kuttner aptly labels it, is particularly evident on crucial economic issues. I believe it can be explained chiefly by the Left (broadly defined) failing to act as the Left.

For example, Obama's Automotive Task Force, composed overwhelmingly of Wall St. Democrats like Larry Summers and Timothy Geithner, is on the verge of delivering a devastating blow to US labor, our manufacturing base, and even Obama's own stimulus plan with its directives to GM and Chrysler. The Task Force's essential direction: save the GM and Chrysler ships by tossing tens of thousands more workers overboard. (See my recent articles in Z and elsewhere)

Yet John Sweeney of the AFL-CIO and Andrew Stern of Change to Win have been virtually silent on this, apparently putting all their eggs in the "card-check" union recognition bill (Employee Free Choice Act.) As the NY Times reported 3/7/09, corporations are moving jobs overseas and closing down divisions at an accelerated pace. But local struggles to stop the closings of profitable plants, even with other companies eager to buy the plants and keep them running, seemingly get no expanded visibility or support from the AFL-CIO or Change to Win.

Thus, at this point, the only substantial pressure that Obama feels is from "centrist" Wall Street Democrats in and out of Congress, supported by the vast majority of the punditry, who embrace the glories of corporate globalization and "free trade", view parasitic for-profit insurers as indispensable to our health care system, feel content with the richest 1% earning 22% of all income, and look forward to bringing Wall Street and the bloated financial sector back to the golden era of the early 2000's (with a few token regulations added in to prevent "excesses.")

Meanwhile, the increasingly hallucinatory Republican Party has ceased competing with Democrats for the sympathies of working-class voters.

Labor and progressive members of Congress seem to be so grateful for a moderately liberal Democrat that they have utterly forgotten their responsibilities to speak up for those who are being shut down, shut up, and foreclosed upon.

But their silence and unwillingness to back up local struggles against plant closings and foreclosures means that Obama will continue to be tugged further and further in the direction of Wall Street Democrats. Roger Bybee, Milwaukee

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Get the Campaign Slogan Right...It was "Yes WE can"
Posted by: marjani on May 26, 2009 8:30 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And the question is "Will WE?"

He said he couldn't do it alone, so how long is America going to sit on its arse and let him be politically browbeaten until he comes out looking like Hillary Clinton and all her talk about universal health care coverage that never materialized?

The America who put Pres Obama in office is responsible for making sure he has the public he needs to make this work--he cannot operate in a vacuum. None of us could.

The public, America, MUST push harder; without us, all of us - 'Yes WE can' - he can't do jack. He said that himself over and over ad nauseum.

Get off your anuses and get to work! He cannot do this alone!

Click

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What WE? Posted by: bonapartist
JUST A THOUGHT ABOUT DECISIONS
Posted by: VZEQICVA on May 26, 2009 8:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
True, Obama has already made some tough calls, but he is expected to make decisions like no other president has had to make. We never had a Guantanamo. Other TEMPORARY camps and prisons were opened with definite plans to close when they were no longer needed. Bush wanted Guantanamo to be open ended. Does Obama prosecute the administration that he succeeded? What about war crimes? This is not about deciding on what to order for lunch. So there are the tough decisions and then there's the hard stuff. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What do so many liberals see in Obama?
Posted by: weslen1 on May 26, 2009 9:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The ONLY thing that matters! He's NOT a republican!
You Know! The "pro-life" "Nuke them all for Jesus" Party!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't assume Mr. Kuttner
Posted by: bonapartist on May 26, 2009 9:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Obama doesn't lack leadership or nerve, which makes his dithering on the financial crisis and straddling on torture all the more bewildering."

I am sorry but the bolded line above is an assumption with little merit. Obama's current performance regarding the economic crisis, wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, social security/medical cover really speaks otherwise. He is a figurehead for the oligarchy that holds the political monopoly in the US, he might be a milder version than Bush but he represents the same interests.

What exactly is so bewildering?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Will the Real Obama Please Step Forward
Posted by: Jaffe on May 26, 2009 10:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Robert Kuttner who is usually a solid liberal reporter steps on his own feet while trying to defend Obama as a president with the courage and resolve to do the right thing.

Yes, he has "dithered on the financial crisis" and, yes, he has "straddled the torture issue," but these are only blips on the teleprompter; they don't speak to the real Obama.

Well, what then of his decision to amp up the the fruitless war against the Taliban in Afghanistan and northwest Pakistan even though nobody in his administration can distinguish Taliban from al-Qaida from "ordinary" orthodox Muslim?

And even though US troops have already killed many more innocent Afghans than "terrorists."

What about his hesitation to fulfill his campaign promise to remove troops from Iraq?

What about his retention of the unimaginative Gates, ex-CIA head and Defense chief under Bush; along with the recent promotion of General McChrystal, well-known for his torturous cruelty toward Muslims?

What about his mixed messages regarding the failed automobile lndustry in the US?

One could go on. But the message seems distressingly clear. Despite his intelligence and grace, Obama may in fact lack the courage, resolve and experience to act consistently on principle.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama's stance on leadership
Posted by: Aquinas on May 26, 2009 10:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is not so hard to understand if you keep in mind that the presidency is a most exclusive club which only a very few get to crash; this results in an attitude or frame of mind, that is very protective of their "brethren". They see their former foes as kindred souls who must be protected from the rabid throngs.
Also, there's the mythical majesty of the "office" that must be preserved at all cost, and which is usually trotted out when the incumbent gets too close to impeachment.
Obama, despite all his campaign hyperbole, is now a victim of the "office", where he will see himself protecting all former presidents, just as future presidents will protect him. It's a very exclusive club and truth be told, they have a lot more in common than even they realize.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama supporter still
Posted by: reelectnoone on May 26, 2009 10:56 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The first thing I want to say is that Obama has already kept more campaign promises in a few months than most presidents ever keep. And rather than waiting until he is about to leave office, he has started fires at the beginning of his term. That takes guts in any politician.

That said, nothing he has inherited is simple or can be fixed with the wave of a hand, especially if he is constantly confronted by weak kneed people on both side of the isle in Congress.

Case in point...everyone applauded his first decision..closing of Gitmo. Then Congress refused to fund the closing.

At each step it seems to be Congress that is foiling change we need, not Obama. Who waters down reform legislation before it reaches the White House for signature? Congress.

Who has gone on record as opposing health care for millions of Americans? Republicans as a whole and some democrats who rely on campaign money from wealthy CEO's of health care.

As far as the "non-issue" of releasing photos of bad treatment of detainees, since we can't see those we can't know if it would also involve releasing identities of persons who may or may not be prosecuted for war crimes some day. Photos, unlike Bush's memos, contain individual privacy issues that have to be considered, especially if those may eventually become evidence at some point. That is not waffling on the torture issue.

Financial crisis? Congress is not cooperating to the fullest. It is they who write the legislation, not the White House. It is members of congress who are in the pockets of special interest groups.

You don't like what is happening? Please post here the number of letters you have personally written to Congress to protest their foot dragging.

They wrote the bills that left foreclosure relief out completely. They wrote the bill to "reform" bankruptcy yet caved to big banks by failing to allow judges to adjust mortgage rates for homesteads as they can for investment properties. People who own investment real estate can ask the bankruptcy judge to force mortgage adjustment but not if it is the home you and your family live in!

Not Obama's doing...point your finger at Congress.

This is a system of laws. Those who like to complain about the president probably want someone like Bush to return..someone who wiped his hind-parts with the law.

Make up your minds...do you want a nation of law or a nation run by an administration who thumbs his nose at the law.

Want change? The YOU need to be involved instead of just complaining in blog. The white house has its own twitter, face book and its own contact form on the White House web page.

Never in the past has any president been so available to the average persons thoughts so if you keep your mouths shut, as you did when Bush was president you get what you deserve. A government run by politicians in Congress.

Stop crying and start participating !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Obama supporter still Posted by: cmaciain
What did you expect from a man taking bribes from the fasists?
Posted by: Farasien on May 26, 2009 11:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
During the campaign, I allowed myself to believe that we might actually have someone who wasn't an out-and-out crook. Then, I saw he was taking PAC money and campaign contributions from... drumroll please... the pharmaceutical lobby, the energy companies, the defense contracting companies, the banks who tanked the US economy and many others whose power relied on, you got it, things remaining EXACTLY THE SAME. So he made some good speeches, gave a first-class blowjob to the (so-called) progressives who then, in post-orgasmic resolution forgot about his financial backers. He got elected, and in true politician form, immediately began breaking his campaign promises to avoid pissing off his REAL employers- the entrenched interests who bankrolled his campaign.

Why is anybody shocked?

This is what politicians do, folks- they lie to you, pump up your patriotism/optimism/hope and then fuck you as soon as your back is turned. I thought it particularly telling in the speech he gave about the health care conference where he essentially gave the progressives a big middle finger... AND NOBODY CALLED HIM ON IT. In my opinion, the only thing this guy has done right- really right- since he got into office is help the GOP eat itself. Outside that, its all speeches and show. What the hell happened to that change we were supposed to believe in?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» AIPAC bought him and Likud Posted by: weathered
Something happened
Posted by: willymack on May 26, 2009 12:40 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Between the campaign and the present. The brags have been made, and the time for action has come. So, what's happening? Has the awful reality of the state of our nation put Obama into a state of shock as it did with President Carter, or what? Why aren't we one millimeter closer to being out of Iraq? I know Obama promised to re-focus the emphasis from Iraq to Afghanistan, but WHY? What's to be gained from an escalation of hostilities in Afghanistan, when our presence there is as ILLEGAL (not to mention, immoral) as it is in Iraq? Is the Obama administration blind to the ruinous cost of our folly in those two unfortunate nations? Why the shift from support of single-payer universal health care to the half-assed and fawning cave-in to the insurance and drug racketeers? Was he given notice that he'd better play along, or else? Please send as many letters and other communucations as you can, to his office with your support and admonitions to do what's right. What can it hurt?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

“Obama is Bilderberg’s obedient little boy. He’ll follow orders.”
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on May 26, 2009 6:11 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With old David Rockefeller and his proteges Paul Volker, Tim Geithner (despite recent denials by Geither), Larry Summers, Richard Holbrooke, James Steinberg, etc, at this years secret Bildeberg meet that may be a key quote of our times...

Oh, last and not least - arch NeoCons Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz as architects of phony 1,000 lie old 9/11 "war on terror" on Iraq and Afghanistan were at the secretive Bilderberg meet-up.

Bilderberg 2009 (Politico)

But I'm sure they were all just comparing tan lines and vacation homes at their ultra-high security secret summit, not global policy. Nothing to see here folks. (yeah...)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No, We Can't.
Posted by: Urgelt on May 26, 2009 6:51 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not until we drive corruption out of Washington.

The Democrats aren't going to do it. Obviously not the Republicans. If the citizenry doesn't take power into its own hands and put honest people in Washington, then... No, We Can't. It's that simple.

Our choices are to reform the parties, or to create new ones, or give up.

Obama puts on a good face. He's an able public speaker and often says the right things. But his actions have contradicted all of the hope he has stirred up. He is a tool of corporate interests, as corrupt as the rest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TAXZILLA SOON UNLEASHED
Posted by: reelman on May 28, 2009 9:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OBAMA-DEMS: TAXZILLA SOON UNLEASHED

As the 2009 late spring economy struggles to get back some mojo (despite gov-meant meddling) some are now saying positive things.
This may be to give Obama insulation from having to blame Bush all summer and fall…its getting very lame.

The joker in the deck is that Obama (with his tax cheat staffers) is working on MAJOR taxes on the top half of taxpayers plus business and also the “cap and trade” will stagger the economy. What about the trillion borrowed for the so-called STIM? What about the demo budget that 3x the nation’s debt? You really think the liberal gov-meant can run national health care? You mean like they run Social Security, Medicare and so on?

Not so fast on the “recovery thing”. Ways direct and indirect will be found the next few months to get into your wallet, to take more for all the Obama overspending-borrowing that socialists require. The Dow will get staggered back to the floor by these radical socialist policies just about the time it gets back to its knees.
*****
DEMS TO CRUSH DOW RALLY WITH $170 BILLION OF NEW TAXES TO OVERHAUL HEALTH CARE…
Budget deficit to top $1.8 trillion; 4 times 2008’s record…Government borrowing 50 cents for every dollar it spends…
Weak tax receipts…
*****
J. Carter Obama is here to stay way past this summer…plan accordingly…maybe get a gov-meant job…they are always hiring, always growing.

http://conservablogs.com/theconservativecrawfish

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement