Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

40 More Years: How the Democrats Will Rule the Next Generation

By James Carville and Rebecca Buckwalter-Poza, Simon & Schuster. Posted May 2, 2009.


James Carville demonstrates why the right-wing faithful shouldn't be holding their breath for their party's second coming.
carville40jacketart
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The following is the introduction from "40 More Years: How the Democrats Will Rule the Next Generation" by James Carville with Rebecca Buckwalter-Poza. Copyright 2009 James Carville. Reproduced by permission of Simon & Schuster, New York, NY.

When historians or scientists look back over huge cataclysmic events, they generally find some harbinger that went unnoticed at the time.

There's always a warning. If you're a chaos theorist, it's the flapping of the proverbial butterfly's wings in New York that caused a tsunami in Hong Kong. A meteorologist might think of it in terms of a category five hurricane that began as a low-pressure area off the Cape Verde Islands on the African coast. Historians remember the assassination of the Archduke Ferdinand as the spark for World War I.

When future historians begin to examine the absolutely disastrous events during the term of President Bush, from massive incompetence to blatant falsehoods and the trampling of the Constitution to the savaging of the good name of the United States around the world, they will look for one of these events.

The stealing of the election of 2000 in Florida is going to be a leading qualifier. But it isn't the one to focus on, for several reasons. (After all, there's really nothing that unusual in people resorting to the courts to try to win an election that they didn't win in the first place.)

Two events occurred within a sixty-day time frame that really set the stage for the current state of America and, more to the point, the sorry state of the Republican Party. The first was a memo written by Matthew Dowd in late November or early December of 2000. At the time, it probably escaped the majority of Republicans' notice, and it was certainly well under the Democratic and national radar.

The exact content and evidence he used is largely unknown. I certainly don't know what exactly was in it, and I don't know of anyone who'd let me borrow a copy as I was writing this book. The best authority on the content of the Matthew Dowd memo that I know of is Thomas Edsall, who wrote about it in Building Red America. Here's Edsall's summary of the momentous memo that sealed the fate of the Republicans in 2008 and beyond:

Dowd analyzed poll data and found that the percentage of voters who could be classified as genuinely "swing" or persuadable voters had shrunk from roughly 24 percent of the electorate, to 6 percent or less. This meant that developing governing and election strategies geared at building up turnout among base votes became much more important than developing governing and election strategies designed to appeal to swing, or middle-of-the-road, voters. Persuading a non-voting conservative, a regular listener to Rush Limbaugh, or a hunter determined to protect gun rights to register and get to the polls became much more important and more cost effective than going after the voter who is having trouble making up his mind as to which candidate to vote for. The result was the adoption of policies designed to please the base (tax cuts for the wealthy, restricting abortion, appointing very conservative judges, opposition to stem cell research) that ran counter to Bush's 2000 claim to be a "uniter, not a divider."

Essentially Dowd concluded that trying to win elections by appealing to people in the middle, the vaunted swing vote, was a waste of time. Dowd posited that the real way to win elections was to appeal to and mobilize base voters. In essence Dowd repackaged a strategy many other Republicans, including Reagan, had used before, playing to the base to get elected, and suggested taking it quite a ways further than the GOP had ever dreamed. The Bush team embraced Dowd's memo enthusiastically.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: politics, right, democrats, republicans, obama, left, james carville, excerpts, rebecca buckwalter-poza

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Politics! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
America will be lucky
Posted by: Fred Flintstone on May 2, 2009 1:20 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to survive the four years of Obama (the mad Pakistan bomber). Without a serious and deep change of direction the USA will be a distant memory (possibly nightmare) in 40 years. Do you see ANY serious change of direction? Bush did wars and Obummer is making them bigger and wider. Bush did bankster bailouts and Obummer is doing them bigger and has even invited all of the crooks onto his team.

Obama is a front man for the final looting of America...next stop DEATH.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: America will be lucky Posted by: left_libertarian
» America will be luckier Posted by: Sparks56
» RE: America will be luckier Posted by: Sparks56
» Yes, I do Posted by: Beck
» Great point. Posted by: Wayne Etheridge
» Within 12 words... Posted by: LeaderofMen
» RE: Within 12 words... Posted by: Spot
» RE: Within 12 words... Posted by: Aimleft
» RE: Within 12 words... Posted by: DaBear
A Better Title
Posted by: Sparks56 on May 2, 2009 2:19 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A better title to the article would have been, "Carville Plugs New Book". I like James Carville but this is not a time to be smug. Entire libraries will be written on the sins and failures of many people during the Bush Administration. Democrats would do well not to repeat the Republicans' mistake of thinking they have a lock on an electoral majority.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jeb Bush in 2012
Posted by: Perry Logan on May 2, 2009 2:56 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In my personal Book of Prophecy, the Democrats lose the White House in 2012, due to four lackluster years of an Obama Presidency, continued economic doldrums, the festering Republican war crimes, and industrial-strength vote-flipping.

The next President will be Jeb Bush (except that, Like Bush II, he won't really be President).

Jeb will try to get the neocon thing going again, but it won't go well. The nation will realize it cannot survive with all these low-IQ Republican traitors hanging around.

This time, a real Democrat will be put into office. He/She will herd all Republicans into Utah, where they can form their own country and will be dead within weeks. :)

Also Spracht Perry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reform
Posted by: Tom Degan on May 2, 2009 3:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good morning Mr. and Mrs. America and all the ships at sea....

Well now! You would think that the Democrats would start to show some long overdue profiles in courage now that they are firmly back in power, wouldn't you? Wouldn't you? Think again.

A tip of the hat to that silly party is in order. Once in a blue moon I'll find myself trying to remember why I disengaged myself from that stupid organization over a decade ago. But as soon as the thought crosses my mind, they will cheerfully remind me. At a time when the nation is desperate to take a decided turn to the left, a number of Democrats are in the process of sabotaging that party's traditional progressive agenda

Three weeks ago on MSNBC's Morning Joe, the announcement was made that Evan Bayh (pictured above) was going to be providing that program with an exclusive. Sure enough, within an hour, there was the distinguished senator from Indiana telling Joe Scarborough and Mika Brezezinski that he had organized a group of "moderate" Democrats in the senate whose sole purpose was keeping that party's Liberal wing in check.

First of all, let's get honest here. The goal of Bayh and his co-saboteurs is not to nudge "their party's liberal agenda to the center". Their purpose is to force that party's essentially centrist agenda to the far right. They are also positioning themselves to have their collective butts kissed by the party's rank and file in order to get anything done legislatively. Call it what you will, but my definition is outright political blackmail. It is one of the most disgusting power plays I've seen come from within " the party of FDR" in a long time. Count on it: Bayh is positioning himself to challenge President Obama in the primaries three years from now. Gee, I wonder if Evan Bayh would have been this dead-set against the president's agenda had he been chosen to be second on the ticket? This has got to be revenge.

To paraphrase the late, great Mr. Fred Rogers: "Can you say 'Contemptible Bastard'? Sure you can!"

Treacherous Democrats are hardly a new phenomenon. Remember poor old, crazy Zell Miller challenging Chris Matthews to a duel immediately after addressing the 2004 Republican convention? Or how about "loyal Democrat" Joe Lieberman who refused to accept the verdict of his party when they denied him the nomination three years ago? He ran as an Independent and defeated the Democratic nominee. To show that there were no hard feelings, Joe would endorse John McCain in '08 and even did an award winning reprise of Zell Miller's much heralded performance when he made a key note speech at the GOP's convention last summer. Do you remember all of those cowardly Democrats who stupidly voted to give George W. Bush the authority to invade the sovereign nation of Iraq in October of 2002 without the constitutionally mandated Congressional approval? As far as yours truly is concerned, that party has damned near lost all of its much lamented credibility. As Theodore Roosevelt once said of President McKinley, they have "all the backbone of a chocolate eclair".

Now that the GOP has committed national suicide does not mean we're going to all live happily ever after - far from it. The Dems need to be reformed from top to bottom.

There Goes Arlen

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Dear Tof: DemoPublicans... Posted by: jvaljon1
» SORRY. SHOULD BE "TOM!!!" Posted by: jvaljon1
» SORRY. SHOULD BE "TOM!!!" Posted by: jvaljon1
Republican philosophy leads to failure.
Posted by: jstuv on May 2, 2009 3:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
News Flash:

a) Half of all humanity has a below average IQ.

b) Predominantly Republican (Red) states have below average IQs.

c) By definition, the average Republican Party voter has below average intelligence.

d) In American History, the contemporary Republican philosophy is a failed concept.

e) The REPUBLICAN PHILOSOPHY: In order to maximize profit, all labor would be so minimally compensated that workers would practically be slaves. Wealth could only be inherited, as it would not be taxed. The small elitist base would continually shrink. Elections would be perfunctory, as the outcome was already determined.

f) History has shown that implemented Republican philosophy leads to failure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Repug "Values" only refers to Monatary Gains, not Virtues
Posted by: Purple Girl on May 2, 2009 4:06 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dems need to change the rhetoric regarding what constutites an American 'Value' and What exemplifies our Ethics.The Repugs were able to bastardize both Religious morals and American Ethics.
The Religious Right has been a cash cow for the Repugs.They have convinced the RR that 'Greed is Good'- that God has 'blessed' those with wealth and that it would be 'sin' to share with those He has deemed 'unworthy' of wealth, aka their abhorrence to 'Redistribution'.
Dems need to re configure this concept to prove that Essentially Taxes are the mode of distributing 'Fish & Bread'.Additionally that Our Founders included those less able in the opening words 'We the People' and 'inalienable Rights'.
Further this unholy alleince of 'Guns and Gods' must be put in the global context it deserves- the Tailban and AQ also expound the 'virtue' of 'Guns and God'.Clearly this has great monatary 'value' for the MIC, Wars are profitable.
Next come the reality that not all conceptions result in births, even without abortion.so does that make God (The Almighty, and His Will) Murderous?Also not every child Born is Loved nor afforded all the necessities required to live a full and productive life, So life goes beyond Birth.
We must redefine 'Life' as that which also includes Life after birth. along with all Life that sustains Life (plants, animals, the environment).
The Repugs (Corps) love unfettered procreation- the denial of birth control or education to avoid unwanted pregnancies- because the more profound imbalance of the supply side of the commodity of Labor to the Demand side of jobs, the cheaper it gets.A lean and hungry workforce makes for less restrictive Regs and less demand for fair wages & bennies.
Thus Corps (esp Multinationals) have become 'Pharoah' when it comes to unfair labor practices and conditions.Essentially the Rallying Cry for all that labor should be 'Free my People'.
Lastly we must have an honest discussion about 'End of Days'.It is one thing to be alarmed by the 'signs', but another to attempt to facilitiate these 'signs'. Needless wars, ignoring global Warming,Blaming others for Diseases, Passing false Judgement on others, constantly labeling someone the AntiChrist, are not words or actions of those who revere or honor Gods Almightiness and Design.These people who are Hell Bent on labeling this 'End of Days', are not only working way above their pay scale,but are acting as though they've seized the 'corner office'.
And Who profits from reckless disregard of limited resources- the idea there is no need to worry about future ramifications, to exploiting these resources to the very last drop (which of course will drive up prices)- the Corps. This 'Get it while it lasts' mentality so evident on Wall Street has infected the RR under the guise of this 'End of Days' mantra.
The Repugs are right we do Not share their 'Values', the monatary worth of human interaction and responsiblity.We seek the 'Valueless' virture of Ethics. Ethics may or may not always provide a cash value, but it does provide the basis for all that is good about our country and Humanity.Our Country was built on Ethical standards, from there we earned it's value, to it's citizens and the global community.
So does Torture hold Value- possibly, but it holds no Ethical virtue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Repugs had total power for less than 12 years...
Posted by: xvictor on May 2, 2009 6:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...and they behaved like drunken sailors in a bar during happy hour.

The Dems, not saying they were perfect, at least held on for a 40 year stretch. They lost seats in the past because they sat on their laurels and underestimated the Rethugs capabilities for dirty tricks. And it was only thru dirty tricks that they able to win and hold power for so long. Certainly not because of their false ideology.

So just like you should never give an alcholic a bottle of liquor, the repugs should never have been given unfettered power. they totally blew it.

Lessons to be learned.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Both parties deserve a thorough spanking IMHO. Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» off-topic rubbish. Posted by: superfeduphoosier
This is exactly...
Posted by: oregoncharles on May 2, 2009 7:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what the Republicans were saying, a few short years ago.

It's hubris, and it goeth before a fall.

I just hope enough Americans remember the Bush years to keep us from reverting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OMG ! This article is completely laughable ! Alternet, what the hell were you thinking ?!?
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on May 2, 2009 7:46 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is completely laughable to suggest that the Democrats will be ruling for the next 40 years. Four years ago it was assumed that the Republicans would have a complete lock for the next 10-20 years but 2006 pretty much knocked them out. What's the guarentee that the Democrats will keep their majority in Congress in 2010 or even the White House in 2012 with the way Obama is continuing most of Dubya's policies of wars and selling out? Why can't Independents have a chance? Let's see how you react when Independents snatch a few dozen seats in Congress next year no thanks to you or the rightwing butt monkies. This kind of partisan bullshit James Carville and his partisan idiots especially the Obamabots keep pumping up make me laugh so hard I almost wet myself. :)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How the left, and the right, will fail.
Posted by: rafaeltoral on May 2, 2009 8:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Democrats and Republicans are one and the same. They play the false left vs right paradigm to keep you pissed off and confused.
Nothing ever gets accomplished.

Its not about democrat or republican. Its about rich or poor. Try as you might you will accomplish nothing when working within a broken/rigged system. Every facet of our government is corrupt and serves the interests of the rich.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How the left, and the right, will fail. Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
It will be more than 40 years before the Dem Party upholds their principles. Change My ass!
Posted by: waterflaws on May 2, 2009 9:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And it will be MORE THAN 40 years before the likes of Carville actually uphold the principles espoused (but rarely enacted) by The Democratic Party.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

define "democrat"...
Posted by: Annapurna1 on May 2, 2009 10:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
its true that the # of ppl that officially call themselves repubnicans is shrinking..but the flip side is more blue dogs..and 6 blue dogs = 1/2 dozen repugs...my own guesstimate is that the repugs only have to keep 1/3 of congress in order to form a working neoconservative majority...

the question that needs to be asked is whether the repugs are really shrinking and not growing by mitosis...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Historian of the future have an incontovertible case . . .
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on May 2, 2009 10:14 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Future historians have an incontrovertible case with which they will demonstrate that the ideological, humanist-feminist left started its destruction of the nation and society that lent them the political power necessary in the sixties. Until 1964, the U.S. was a nation more than seventy percent of Anglo-Saxon origin, with seventy-one percent of its surnames German. The ideal of the individual capitalist, the so-called Protestant Work Ethic, gender roles based upon natural selection, and Germanic culture generally had become the culture of the United States.

Then, obviously - and very much so - things began to change precipitously. The U.S. began repudiating the very cultural forces that had made it great. Aided and abetted mightily by greed engendered by the miliary industrial complex about which a valedictory President Eisenhower warned, the U.S. also rejected his successor's exhortation that we "ask not what your country can do for you, but ask what you can do for your country."

The nation decided, in the words of feminism, "I'm worth it." The nation's females, given the power to do so by males, quickly turned the power on their liberators, to effeminize them and the culture.

Immigrants, the dross of nearly every failed culture and nation on the planet, were imported in order to do the labor for which feminism demonstated its contempt and devalued. By depreciating honest manual labor, the stuff of muscle, and more the masculine like, feminist demanded, and got, a more manageable male.

The nation, in the words of J.S. Mill, "dwarfed its men."

Feminist author Susan Faludi called what feminism did to its male populatin "stifted."

Oh, no, there's no doubt about which ideology will rule in the U.S. It rules now everywhere, and its effects are also everywhere evident. A Russian political historian and sociologist has predicted - four years after I did so in published print - that the U.S. will soon begin breaking up.

It won't be long now. R.I.P. "Land of the Free" - and (former) "Home of the Brave."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You forgot Posted by: LeaderofMen
» RE: You forgot Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
Postscript my last here:
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on May 2, 2009 10:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wouldn't count on forty years, by the way. Mathematical models based on history say it will be closer to twenty or twenty-five years.

Russian political scientist Igor Panarin predicts the U.S. will break into six groups, including a seceeding Texas (four years earlier, I predicted five, with Texas going with a western confederation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Title Says it All
Posted by: throck on May 2, 2009 11:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Dems plan to "rule," us not represent us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We sure have to hope....
Posted by: mrcentrist on May 2, 2009 12:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.... that it's "40 More Years". If the Republicans come back into power earlier than that, they (in their new, more extremist, more hateful, Sarah Palin-worshipping mode) will make the Bush years look like a hippie love-in.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Forty years, huh?
Posted by: willymack on May 2, 2009 12:36 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does any thinking person think our nation will exist in any recognizable form forty years from now? Some serious changes have to be made to break the smothering embrace of corporate America. This will involve the demotion of those who've assigned themselves demigod status, and brainwashed Joe Six Pack into a grotesque hero-worship into inmates in various prisons. President Obama seems intent on painting our nation into a corner of endless war and the continued kowtowing to corporate bigwigs, while speaking of change we can believe in. That change won't take place without bloodshed, either figuratively or literally. We've had far too much of the latter, thank you. It's time to use the law to our BENEFIT, for a change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The trolls think that the Republicans will come back
Posted by: ReallyBearish on May 2, 2009 1:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They won't. The Republicans are no longer a national party but one of the rural South and the West. At this point a third party (urban conservative) and a fourth party (liberal) will come along and compete with the Dems.

A collapsing economy is not one that's going to promote a militaristic, "small government", religious party. Obama may be a one termer, but forget about the Republicans, except as a minority regional party.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What country do you live in anyway? Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
Can't say 40 years but I think they'll hang on until around the middle of the next decade.
Posted by: Ranjit Kumar on May 2, 2009 1:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unless the Republicans are lucky to win in 2010 or 2012. My guess though is the American people will learn to understand Obama and be patient just like him so that by 2012, he is easily reelected and by 2016, the USA will learn to shut up and quit making too many high expectations. The party only started winning in 2006 and they're still too young to be punished. 2014 would be a better threshold to throw them out. Just give them a few more years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

All I have to do is this
Posted by: LeaderofMen on May 2, 2009 3:39 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I only have to think about how Sarah Palin might have been VP. How Carrie Prejean would be paraded across this country with her fake boobs, telling us about how fake gay marriages are because they're not natural.

All I have to do is think about McCain withdrawing into a shell because his melanoma returned, while the country's economy melts down, while he demands more tax cuts for the top 1% of wage earners.

All I have to do is think about how many car companies and the millions of support companies that would have gone under because of the GOP's current response to their problems: LET 'EM DIE.

All I have to do is think about how Souter would be gone and replaced with a fundie Christian, rubberstamped by the GOP Congress who are uninterested in their constituents, but rather what Rush Limbaugh tells them.

All I have to do is think about how many more wars John McCain was sure we'd have to participate in, how the only way it could happen is if they demand a draft.

All I have to do is project real life onto the off-chance that the GOP might have won in 2008.

But it didn't happen. Instead, we got a real leader, who speaks English, who has manners, who is intelligent and who actually lives 100% in the 21st Century.

Too bad, GOP. Too bad for you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: All I have to do is this Posted by: VZEQICVA
Will it matter?
Posted by: Walt K on May 2, 2009 4:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If we can't tell the difference once they're in office, it wasn't worth the effort getting someone with a "D" after their name elected. (Not that Carville has managed much of that).

The shameful performance of Senate Democrats on the mortgage cram-down bill is just the latest example of why it doesn't matter. I won't even bother checking this book out of the library, time to go back to reading Mao.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Will it matter? Posted by: Spot
Wasn't this the same James Carville who trashed Howard Dean and even Obama?
Posted by: Wayne Etheridge on May 2, 2009 8:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until Obama won, Carville went too pessimistic about him. Carville's married to a Rethug. I'm surprised those two are still married.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Carvelle
Posted by: thelastfreeman on May 2, 2009 9:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Or is it caromel or sugar laced cocaine for the liberials addicted to their hatred of Bush. If Jimmy ever did know what truth was he gave that up decades ago. There has been no sea change. Obama's popularity is a mere 2 points above his electoral % and as the rapidly increasing debt buries any hope of a sustained economic recovery, there will come the inevitable backlash against the democrats. The fantasy of 40 years of democrat rule will disappear as the whisp of smoke that it is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Carvelle Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
Tausendjahr Reich, Herr McCarville?
Posted by: Ted Voth Jr on May 2, 2009 9:53 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sounds arrogant, Jim. Or maybe 'McCarville's permanent Democratic majority'. Myself, I date the end of the US Republic to January 20 2009, when Cheney and his little pipsqueak sidekick retired with impunity and the centrist Obama was installed as president. Obama's done nothing to reverse the Constitutional or economic damage of the past 8 years, and intends to continue the war in Iraq indefinitely and to 'surge' in Afghanistan. As Benito Mussolini remarked, 'I'd really rather call it a "corporate state."'

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tausendjahr Reich, Herr McCarville? Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
So are we to assume that the GOP will just sit there and let the Democrats rule like that? HA !
Posted by: John More on May 3, 2009 5:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the last 40 years, the Republicans have been winning on and off. Sometimes, they'd botch an election and allow the Democrats to score a touchdown. For the last 20 years though, the Democrats have a knack of waiting for the GOP to self-destruct rather than go on the offensive and offer their own platform. Hell, they never bothered to visit Texas but simply relied on poll numbers to tell them where to campaign and how wishy washy to be. If you think that the Republicans aren't coming back any time soon, prepare to be shocked. Their ideology has been kept perfectly intact by the Democratic Party leadership and half of the rank and file. People will miss the conservative Republicans as a result and as more voters get put off by the Democrats writing their base off, they'll stay home. Already Congress has done nothing about single payer healthcare or addressing labor. They're already losing the center. The Republicans know how to go on the offensive and they'll find a Reagan or Gingrich to lead pretty soon. When they'll be back in power remains to be seen but I seriously doubt that it will take 40 years or more. I'm already betting that it will take less than 10 years. If I were Mr. Carville, I would not be too elated about this. Voters can and will be fickle when they get more than what they bargained for from one party or the other.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DEMOCRATS' AGENDA
Posted by: VZEQICVA on May 3, 2009 8:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Projecting for the next forty years is preposterous. What The Dems and all the rest of us need is to wake up one morning very soon to hear news that says, "half a million Americans returned to work in the last month and that number is expected to increase". If we can't do that, then all the rest doesn't matter. What we'll be doing next week is far more relevant than what might happen in forty years. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: DEMOCRATS' AGENDA Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
So Carville, What's the answer?
Posted by: johnwinthrop on May 3, 2009 8:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hire a computer literate, bright Latina as your staffer?

Anything in this article could be reversed. In eight years we could have a GOP President, or an Independent President with an Isolationist Streak. Or a Progressive President who thinks Obama was the last straw of Wall St the people should accept. I have no idea what "secret" Carville' was trying to disclose. Perhaps he should retire to enjoy the company of his Chenyite wife with makeup to spare. Becky then might tell us what "the answer" is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Every Party Says This Crap At One Point
Posted by: mikeblack on May 3, 2009 9:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hate it when a political party has things going good for them and then get drunk on it and start making outlandish claims about "WE'LL RULE 4EVER!!!" Bullshit. Nobody will. Politics is all about cycles in America.

The "Reagan Revolution" didn't last. Republicans quickly bounced back after Richard Nixon soiled them. Bill Clinton quickly lost congress. And I distinctly remember Karl Rove going around making the same claims about the GOP ruling America until the end of time after Bush was re-elected in 2004.

Politics goes in cycles. I know everybody thinks the Republicans are down and out for good because they're a joke in shambles right now, but every party goes through this every few decades. They'll (unfortunately) be back, probably taking the White House back in 2016 because you know Joe Biden is unelectable as President. Obama could have a Clinton effect where he's so popular nobody can measure up to him immediately. How quickly some people forget the Democrats were in a bad state after 2000. Not nearly as destroyed as Republicans are now, but in very rough shape for 6 years.

And then after a 2016 GOP victory they'll start ranting and raving about how they'll rule America for decades again and the cycle of bullshit continues....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

James Carville - political trash and drivel.
Posted by: maxpayne on May 3, 2009 10:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The voters will decide how long the Democrats really last. Others have correctly pointed out that the Democrats will likely lose sooner than later.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sorry, but I can't see it happening.
Posted by: CanuckKid on May 3, 2009 10:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My fear is that the electorate's raisin-sized attention span will make them forget what the GOP has done to your fine nation over the last three decades, and they'll put it right back into power in 2016 (likely sooner, if the Dems don't get off their heinies soon and start doing something with their majorities).

Just my view, from the outside looking in...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GOP Wrong Again
Posted by: reg373 on May 3, 2009 10:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In June 1993, Rush Limbaugh published a book "I Told You So", proclaiming the Clinton admin a failure - 6 months into it. That was before he presided over the erasure of the record deficit left by Bush I, and the longest economic expansion in U.S. modern history --
-- found a cool site; Balkingpoints ; incredible satellite view of earth

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who is James Carville anyway?
Posted by: superfeduphoosier on May 3, 2009 12:26 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Answer: He's nothing more than just a plain and simple Beltway party hack elitist who's just as well out of touch with the rest of the nation. He and his wife are doing fine together and he's often been known to hang out with Haley Barbour from time to time. All he gives a rat's ass about is making sure Democrats win, plain and simple. He doesn't give a flying fuck about pandering for votes. Nope, all he wants is to see the party in power. To him, quantity (the number of Democrats to Republicans ratio) is more important than quality (progressives vs blue dogs).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Marquez Milton
Posted by: Marquez_Milton on May 4, 2009 2:18 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
James, you go guy... I am so glad that you have a large voice because you say what I feel but, I don't have the national exposure. I am a registered independent. I live in London. The hate that the republicans have engendered is subsiding. The lies, the death, the stealing of resources must stop and building of a better world must happen. To that end: James speak and don't hold back! In short, Go James Go!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Carville hands out the Owning class Kool-Aid, for a price of course...
Posted by: DaBear on May 5, 2009 4:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Big deal. Huge distraction from reality. Typical aristocracy craptasms and wishful thinking. I used to admire that guy. His book intro just launched that shit-boat sailin' off down pissin' river... where it'll surely pollute the bay with even more owning-class filth.

It's fascinating to me how not ONE owning classer has listened to the scientists or the ex-oil industry geologists who say come 2049 (for years from now) we'll be in a post-oil age. And if the owning class kool aid a la Carville is any indication, the crash'll happen long long before that. Most experts say in the next 20 years at most before zero dino-juice (there's still be some in the ground it'll just cost rather astronomical fortunes to extract).

Keep dreamin', rich boyz. I'm sure the Dims and Repukes who run things will have figured out how to build their Xe-protected arks and fortified castles long before, and long after putting us lowers into camps for our own protection.

Either way, it all comes crashes...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement