Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Consensus Builds for Universal Voter Registration

By Project Vote . Posted November 19, 2008.


Experts and media call for sweeping reform of how voter registration is conducted in America.
voting78
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

America's system of voter registration, in which the responsibility is placed almost solely on individuals, took center stage in this election cycle.

In the wake of historic interest in voting, and after months of controversy surrounding nonprofit registration drives, America's leaders, journalists, and voting rights experts are calling for a new registration system that reduces the need for third-party registration drives and shifts responsibility from the individual to government:

The Washington Post editorializes: "It's time to rethink another vestige of an earlier era -- a voter registration system that not only prevents people from voting but causes myriad troubles for election officials. There's a growing clamor by voting rights advocates to shift the onus on registering from the individual to government. Not only would this remove the single biggest obstacle to voting (consider that in 2004, 28 percent of eligible Americans were not registered to vote), but it would make manipulation of the system harder." A Better Vote, November 9, 2008).

The Los Angeles Times reports: "The nation's much-maligned election system passed a major test last week when more than 132 million Americans -- a record -- cast ballots with few reports of problems. But now, election reformers are calling for a move toward a universal voter registration system, in which the government takes the lead in ensuring that all eligible citizens are registered to vote." (Voter Registration Process is Under Scrutiny; David G. Savage, November 10, 2008).

Rosemary E. Rodriguez, chair of the federal Election Assistance Commission, told the New York Times: "The single most important thing that Congress can do right now is create universal voter registration, which would mean that all eligible voters are automatically registered..." (Push to Expand Voter Rolls and Early Balloting in U.S., Ian Urbina, November 6, 2008).

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton agrees: "A system of automatic registration, in which the government bears more of the responsibility for assembling accurate and secure lists of eligible voters, is a necessary reform," Clinton told the Times. "All eligible Americans should be able to cast their ballot without barriers, and the registration problems we saw on Tuesday and during the weeks that preceded Election Day make clear that the system needs improvement." (Push to Expand Voter Rolls and Early Balloting in U.S, Ian Urbina, November 6, 2008).


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: election reform, project vote, universal voter registrat, 2009 election reform

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Politics! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Finally US might realize it's time to get out of a Flintstonian system!
Posted by: leerhok on Nov 20, 2008 1:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just one example where US are lite yrs behind European nations. Like Germany the country should get rid of the many negative aspects that have a tendency to creep in with federalism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Eliminate the Electoral College
Posted by: nyny3a on Nov 20, 2008 6:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
November 20, 2008 New York Times Editorial

Flunking the Electoral College

On Dec. 15, the United States will endure a quadrennial ritual born in the economics and politics of slavery and the quill-pen era. Members of the Electoral College are scheduled to meet in each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia to formally choose the next president.

There is no real doubt about how the electors will vote, but it is disturbing that they have any role at all in making this vital choice in the 21st century. The Electoral College is more than just an antiquated institution: it actively disenfranchises voters and occasionally (think 2000) makes the candidate with fewer popular votes president. American democracy would be far stronger without it.

For the complete editorial go to the Times web site. Search for the title.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]