comments_image Comments

In Post-9/11 America, Can Reasonable Hope Win Out Against Fear and Misdirected Resentment?

 
 
Share
 
 
 

Just after four American civilian planes brought low the world's only superpower and greatest nerve center ten years ago, I said on NPR that they’d made a mockery of the dollar-driven premise that our massive defense establishment can still defend an open society.

It's even truer now. Instead of re-thinking our defense and foreign policies since then, we’ve become less open and, in a way, weaker — nowhere more so than at universities that, like Yale, are employing, as “professors” to the young, John Negroponte (George W. Bush’s national intelligence director), Gen. Stanley McChrystal, Tony Blair, and other "practitioners" of grand strategies that have brought us to where we are now.

The question we haven’t answered since 9/11 is whether a society such as ours has the will and moral resources to defend itself: not as a global directorate, police force, or profit center, but as a republic: a wellspring of civic disciplines that sustain a politics of reasonable hope against a politics of fear and misdirected resentment.

On the other hand, though, it has to be recognized that the attacks on the World Trade Center also mocked claims by the powerless that terrorism is morally or spiritually redemptive. It certainly wasn’t on 9/11. This wasn’t John Brown's anti-slavery raid on Harper's Ferry, or guerrilla warfare against Latin American juntas, much less a more uplifting and democratic Velvet revolution or a civil-rights movement like our own. It was, rather, an implosion of anything that anyone who believes in politics can endorse.

The bloody paradox we've been ducking shows that our global technologies and investments can’t by themselves dissolve the oldest of errant human impulses -- the religious and tribal fanaticism carried by the suicide bombers.

It’s too early now to say whether the Arab Spring shows that millions of the powerless have learned that hard lesson any better than we’ve learned ours: Have they sidelined terrorism any more than we’ve sidelined the crackpot “realism” of our national-security system and of the casino-finance, corporate-welfare, consumer-defrauding tsunami system that drives it?

Our civil society has to produce fewer brilliant tsunami surfers and more pearl divers – civic patriots who plumb the undercurrents and unearth the buried treasures of the powerless in our midst. That’s 9/11's hardest lesson. In 2008, Barack Obama seemed to embody and testify to the fact that we’d learned it. But he and we are still discovering just how hard that lesson really is and how much loving struggle our civic redemption will require.

A version of this post first appeared in theYale Daily News.

AlterNet / By Jim Sleeper

Posted at September 9, 2011, 6:47am

 
See more stories tagged with: