comments_image Comments

The Most Sensible American on Gun Control: George Costanza

 
 
Share
 
 
 

As politicians continue to dodge the gun-control issue while discussing the Colorado murders, the person who's the most reasonable is the man made famous by playing Jerry Seinfeld's bumbling, narcissistic best friend George Costanza. That would be Jason Alexander, who released a statementsparked by a tweet that calmly and eloquently called for a ban on assault weapons. The Colorado killer, of course, committed his crimes with an AR-15 automatic weapon. Alexander:

 

Then I get messages from seemingly decent and intelligent people who offer things like: @BrooklynAvi: Guns should only be banned if violent crimes committed with tomatoes means we should ban tomatoes. OR @nysportsguys1: Drunk drivers kill, should we ban fast cars?

I'm hoping that right after they hit send, they take a deep breath and realize that those arguments are completely specious. I believe tomatoes and cars have purposes other than killing. What purpose does an AR-15 serve to a sportsman that a more standard hunting rifle does not serve? Let's see - does it fire more rounds without reload? Yes. Does it fire farther and more accurately? Yes. Does it accommodate a more lethal payload? Yes. So basically, the purpose of an assault style weapon is to kill more stuff, more fully, faster and from further away. To achieve maximum lethality. Hardly the primary purpose of tomatoes and sports cars. [...]

 

I have been reading on and off as advocates for these weapons make their excuses all day long. Guns don't kill - people do. Well if that's correct, I go with @BrooklynAvi, let them kill with tomatoes. Let them bring baseball bats, knives, even machetes --- a mob can deal with that.

There is no excuse for the propagation of these weapons. They are not guaranteed or protected by our constitution. If they were, then we could all run out and purchase a tank, a grenade launcher, a bazooka, a SCUD missile and a nuclear warhead. We could stockpile napalm and chemical weapons and bomb-making materials in our cellars under our guise of being a militia.

These weapons are military weapons. They belong in accountable hands, controlled hands and trained hands. They should not be in the hands of private citizens to be used against police, neighborhood intruders or people who don't agree with you. These are the weapons that maniacs acquire to wreak murder and mayhem on innocents. They are not the same as handguns to help homeowners protect themselves from intruders. They are not the same as hunting rifles or sporting rifles. These weapons are designed for harm and death on big scales. 

He ends on a blessing. What a man. And the statement really drives the point home: where are the politicians on this? Read Alexander's exegesis in full here.

AlterNet / By Julianne Escobedo Shepherd

Posted at July 23, 2012, 8:08am

 
See more stories tagged with: