NEWS & POLITICS  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 126

For Obama, No Opportunity Is Too Big to Blow

No President since FDR has been handed as many opportunities to transform the U.S. into something that doesn't threaten the stability of life on this planet. Is he blowing it?
December 21, 2009  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest News & Politics headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 

Contrary to countless reports, the debacle in Copenhagen was not everyone's fault. It did not happen because human beings are incapable of agreeing, or are inherently self-destructive. Nor was it all was China's fault, or the fault of the hapless UN.

There's plenty of blame to go around, but there was one country that possessed unique power to change the game. It didn't use it. If Barack Obama had come to Copenhagen with a transformative and inspiring commitment to getting the U.S. economy off fossil fuels, all the other major emitters would have stepped up. The EU, Japan, China and India had all indicated that they were willing to increase their levels of commitment, but only if the U.S. took the lead. Instead of leading, Obama arrived with embarrassingly low targets and the heavy emitters of the world took their cue from him.

(The "deal" that was ultimately rammed through was nothing more than a grubby pact between the world's biggest emitters: I'll pretend that you are doing something about climate change if you pretend that I am too. Deal? Deal.)

I understand all the arguments about not promising what he can't deliver, about the dysfunction of the U.S. Senate, about the art of the possible. But spare me the lecture about how little power poor Obama has. No President since FDR has been handed as many opportunities to transform the U.S. into something that doesn't threaten the stability of life on this planet. He has refused to use each and every one of them. Let's look at the big three.

Blown Opportunity Number 1: The Stimulus Package When Obama came to office he had a free hand and a blank check to design a spending package to stimulate the economy. He could have used that power to fashion what many were calling a "Green New Deal" -- to build the best public transit systems and smart grids in the world. Instead, he experimented disastrously with reaching across the aisle to Republicans, low-balling the size of the stimulus and blowing much of it on tax cuts. Sure, he spent some money on weatherization, but public transit was inexplicably short changed while highways that perpetuate car culture won big.

Blown Opportunity Number 2: The Auto Bailouts Speaking of the car culture, when Obama took office he also found himself in charge of two of the big three automakers, and all of the emissions for which they are responsible. A visionary leader committed to the fight against climate chaos would obviously have used that power to dramatically reengineer the failing industry so that its factories could build the infrastructure of the green economy the world desperately needs. Instead Obama saw his role as uninspiring down-sizer in chief, leaving the fundamentals of the industry unchanged.

Blown Opportunity Number 3: The Bank Bailouts Obama, it's worth remembering, also came to office with the big banks on their knees -- it took real effort not to nationalize them. Once again, if Obama had dared to use the power that was handed to him by history, he could have mandated the banks to provide the loans for factories to be retrofitted and new green infrastructure to be built. Instead he declared that the government shouldn't tell the failed banks how to run their businesses. Green businesses report that it's harder than ever to get a loan.

Imagine if these three huge economic engines -- the banks, the auto companies, the stimulus bill -- had been harnessed to a common green vision. If that had happened, demand for a complementary energy bill would have been part of a coherent transformative agenda.

Whether the bill had passed or not, by the time Copenhagen had rolled around, the U.S. would already have been well on its way to dramatically cutting emissions, poised to inspire, rather than disappoint, the rest of the world.

There are very few U.S. Presidents who have squandered as many once-in-a-generation opportunities as Barack Obama. More than anyone else, the Copenhagen failure belongs to him.

Research support for Naomi Klein's reporting from Copenhagen was provided by the Investigative Fund at The Nation Institute.


submit to reddit
Naomi Klein is an award-winning journalist and syndicated columnist and the author of the international and New York Times bestseller The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism (September 2007); an earlier international best-seller, No Logo: Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies; and the collection Fences and Windows: Dispatches from the Front Lines of the Globalization Debate (2002). Read more at Naomiklein.com.
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest News & Politics headlines via email
 
Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

Blown Saves, or Thrown Games?
Posted by: woody, tokin' librul on Dec 21, 2009 12:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the three cases you address specifically, as well as the fourth, in Copenhagen, I find it difficult not to think such uniformity of CorpoRat-friendly ends is NOT a sheer coincidence. This leads me to conclude that Pres. Shamwow has neglected those opportunities to offer transformative policies not out of incompetence or ignorance, but on the instructions of those whose immediate interests are served by profiting from Pres. Shamwow's reticence to speak up and lead on matters of global substance and humanity-wide consequence.

Iow: He's sold us out, right down the line.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Now you know why Emanuel
Posted by: weathered on Dec 21, 2009 1:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
put his thumb to his snotty little nose and wiggled his stubby little fingers.
The 'Manchurian' candidate indeed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

If Fox only knew
Posted by: Denver2tom on Dec 21, 2009 1:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
they could have closed down after the election and just sat back and let Obama and the Dems run their course. Fox wasted all that time trying to convince the left they were smucks, (for all the wrong reasons), when Obama was going to do it all for them. Well now we know, if only there was one green or socialist senator, the Dems have shown just how valuble a third party vote is (ie Joe Liberman.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Obama didn't blow anything.
Posted by: photon's feather on Dec 21, 2009 5:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To suggest he did, is to suggest that he is somehow interested in meeting the goals written of here.

Not true.

Obama knew exactly what he was doing.

Don't like it? Too late! The time to stand up for Obama(nable) was during the primaries.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

congress writes the laws..
Posted by: luzmejor on Dec 21, 2009 9:36 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The president doesn't. All he can do is to sign, or not sign, the laws they produce and hand over to him.

Start complaining to our corrupt Republicans and Democrats in Congress. Burn their ears off and write scathing letters. Tell them you are mad as hell and you are not going to take it any longer. Write letters to every newspaper you can contact. Americans have been way too polite about how their government has allowed these scurvy creeps in congress to steal from all of us.

They work for us, not for corporation thugs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Wrong Posted by: bonapartist
» RE: Wrong Posted by: TheUsualSuspects
» RE: Wrong Posted by: buffeliscious
» And furthermore... Posted by: buffeliscious
» RE: congress writes the laws.. Posted by: cberkland

Comments are closed-

The Changes we wanted to believe in
Posted by: kettleblack on Dec 22, 2009 6:45 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... but the Messiah could not, would not, did not deliver.

Changes that would have positioned America to lead the world in the 21st century. Instead, we cling to 19th century technology (internal combustion engine), with 20th century fuel (oil), using the Neocons Plan (centered on foreign oil) to lead the world into the New Millennium. There is no comprehensive Energy Plan for America, except drill, baby, drill.

If America took the wrong fork in the road during the Bush years (endless wars vs. green future), can there be a way to reverse this path?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Aptly Posited Posted by: edgar_michel

Comments are closed-

WTF Alternet??!!
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com on Dec 23, 2009 11:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article was in the Peek section, I posted a comment there.

You guys moved it to here and my comment is gone.

WTF

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Uh - Health Care???
Posted by: patvic14056 on Dec 23, 2009 12:54 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Big No. 4 blown opportunity - Health Care Reform. I'm not even going to post anything more than that. Draw your own conclusions.

Obama '08. Selling US Out '09. This bumper sticker is on the back window of my car. Go ahead and copy it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Uh - Health Care??? Posted by: scremf

Comments are closed-

bad news
Posted by: matta on Dec 23, 2009 5:14 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with all the reasons I've heard why it won't work. Debating the different reasons is pointless as it's not one thing, it's "all of the above". Another reason it will fail is that when regular people are faced with a bleak economic outlook, they'll SAVE the money, not spend. It's common sense. Why would anyone feel compelled to blow money in a spending spree? And this is still not the latest news. Better to save for that rainy day that's almost sure to happen. This package may just be a steaming pile of liberal dung, but I feel the republicans should let it pass. Just pull an Obama and vote "present". That way when this thing flops, they won't be attached to it. If my fellow republicans want my advice it's to "circle the wagons", get rid of dead wood(Rinos), fortify their constituancy, and let the libs dig their own graves. Trust me, they've noone else to blame but themselves now and that's all there is to the libs, Blame someone else. Bad news.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: bad news Posted by: grkjr

Comments are closed-

She is right but he still better then Bush & perhaps he will learn
Posted by: cori on Dec 23, 2009 5:55 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need to remember how bad Bush was and how he contributed so much to this state of affairs. But the powers behind the scene have been working up to total corporate rule for decades. Taking more and more away from the people in every way from our taxes, services, rights, regulation, safety nets. We must take a stand like those workers in Michael Moore's last doc CAPITALISM. When all is said and done Obama is better then Bush -Perhaps he will learn. If you remember as soon as Edwards started to gain more interest the media marginalized him and he vanished. They wanted Obama - probably because Obama agreed to be the president he is. But if we go into reaction like we did with Nader we will end up with another neocon - change has to come from us. We need to keep up the pressure. They depend on our apathy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

The majority want everything to 'get back to normal'
Posted by: outlook on Dec 24, 2009 1:26 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and that, Naomi, is the prevailing zeitgeist. If he had come to power waving a green magic wand, he would have been run out of town. Change, yes, but change is a gradual process. Most in the West and, increasingly, in the East, want to cling on to the life-style provided by the old model. A new paradigm is arising from the ground up, and in the minds of the younger generation. So let's concentrate on the positive and stop the Obama bashing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Larry Sinclair too...
Posted by: xbj on Dec 25, 2009 5:19 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama. What a pathetic loser.

What FOOLS you all were.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Larry Sinclair too... Posted by: mrsanfran
» RE: Larry Sinclair too... Posted by: weenie

Comments are closed-

Winos
Posted by: Minnow on Dec 26, 2009 12:44 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You guys are a bunch of winers. It's good to see 'opportunity' in a problem, but open up your progressive minds. Obama is not God, as you do expect him to be. He is not a diety. He is another human being just trying to clean up the messes left behind from the previous administration.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The Blame Game Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» Traitors. Posted by: Paul_C

Comments are closed-

Naomi is Way Late ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Dec 26, 2009 1:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here on the Alternet we have been bemoaning Obama's giveaways for months and months now ...

She doesn't even mention the lack of War Crimes investigations that should be happening ...

Sorry Naomi ... too little ... too late ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A Taste of Reality Posted by: BulldogRedeemer
» RE: A Taste of Reality Posted by: mmckinl

Comments are closed-

BA
Posted by: mnstra on Dec 26, 2009 3:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Will not read anything more about Obamas failings. He is a slick politician who you voted in , purely on emotion..Fools.You Naomi missed the once in a generation opportunity to vote in a third party, and you all blew it.It was clear how both parties transferred wealth away from American workers and the greed of Wall Street, and yet you voted in a major party hack anyway Good luck.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: BA Posted by: Tom Degan

Comments are closed-

VOCA
Posted by: Revolutionary (Direct) Democracy on Dec 26, 2009 4:06 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A Vote of Confidence Amendment will give American voters the power to dismiss any federal officeholder at any time.

VOCA, Now !!

FREE AMERICA

REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: VOCA Posted by: swooshy
» RE: VOCA Posted by: atomsmasher
» Now you're talkin' Posted by: godsbreath64
» RE: VOCA Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: VOCA Posted by: C.Richardi

Comments are closed-

So naomi ...its all reformable ...just throw money at it ???
Posted by: ghost in the machine on Dec 26, 2009 4:38 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Naomi shows herself up to be the radical liberal she is .....its all a nice idea what she says , but reality shows a different motion to history , and Obama is qualifying that loud and clear ...'Radical liberalism' 'progressivism' is dead .....but I think Naomi will continue to flog it for the dead horse it is .....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Learning from FDR
Posted by: Tom Degan on Dec 26, 2009 4:55 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although it has become almost a cliche it is undeniable: Roosevelt saved capitalism by tempering its excesses. While it was not perfectly flawless, the rules put into place by by the New Dealers worked pretty well for almost fifty years - until the nineteen-eighties, that is. That was when the American voters (for reasons I still can't figure out) overwhelmingly decided that sending Ronald Reagan to the White House would be a really neat idea. Reagan was a feeble-minded, failed "B" movie actor at the dawn of senility who should have been in an assisted living program somewhere, being spoon-fed oatmeal. Instead, January 20, 1981 saw him taking the oath of office as the fortieth president of the United States. Life is kind of funny that way, ya know?

Reagan and his team were hellbent on dismantling the legacy of FDR and the New Deal. "No!", they told us. "The unprecedented economic expansion of the post World War Two era is not because of regulation, but in spite of it", they assured us. "Let the market regulate itself and all will be well! There will be dancing in the street! It will be morning in America again!"

Nearly three decades later that philosophy has been forever exposed as the scam it obviously was to anyone who bothered to pay attention in the first place. The chickens have come home to roost with a vengeance. The economic carnage that we have experienced in the last year was bound to happen and had been predicted for years (including on this site: December 31, 2007 and June 9, 2008). It was as inevitable as the sun setting in the west. Twenty-nine years ago, the fortieth president put his country in jalopy without a steering wheel. This is the road he sent us hurling down.

Here's a promise, America: One day very soon you will wake up and realize what a complete fool Reagan was.

Christmastime is Here Again

Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Learning from FDR Posted by: atomsmasher
» RE: Learning from FDR Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Learning from FDR Posted by: C.Richardi
» RE: Learning from FDR Posted by: Tom Degan

Comments are closed-

Omama's Real Problem...
Posted by: AlteredStates on Dec 26, 2009 6:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is that he was and still is naive. He thought he could run the Oval Office the way he ran things as a "community organizer" in the Chicago area.

His other problem is that he hates direct conflict with his adversaries. I think that in spite of this fine mind and sterling education he is in way over his head in the world of national and international politics and with the over- bearing monster called Wall Street. He is more interested in keeping peace with his opponents than he is in leading.

Dealing with high powered leaders in the military, banking, and Wall Street, as President, as opposed to a conciliatory community organizer is something he doesn't seem to be able to do. He thinks "cum by yah" when the real movers and shakers in D.C. read him the riot act on how they want things to be.

He let Congress tell him that the "public option" was not part of their thinking on health care reform. His generals told him they could "win" the war on terror in Afghanistan with more bombs and guns instead of deferring to the lessons learned by other would be conquerers of Afghanistan. He let the bankers decide on what to do about the sub-prime mortgage mess. And, he back peddled into the Copenhagen summit with a flaccid agenda of "not too much change" when it came to climate change.

What we've seen since January 20th 2009 is a series of compromises from a President too weak to really lead and make the changes we need to put this country on the right track to real economic recovery, solve unemployment, institute universal health care coverage, tell the banks to correct the mess they created in the first place, and end these stupid, pointless, endless, wars.

He has been wooed by the military/industrial complex and the ruling class into keeping things just the way they are and have been. Instead of change, Obama has given us change we don't believe in; more of the un-changing "status quo" that he preached against; a more secretive, less transparent government that caters to the rich and powerful and not to the needs of the people who got him elected. And, he wonders why we are disappointed with his performance. That is indicative of the depth of his naivety.

Still, he is nowhere near as bad as George W. Bush and the Cheney cabal that wrecked this country. But, his policy decisions are taking us down the same road we traveled with those two previous carnival acts. I think this is the way it is going to be for the next three years with Obama. And, by the time he realizes that his way of doing business isn't going to solve our real, pressing, problems, his Presidency will be over, and a Republican will again be in the White House to bleed, what's left of an already dying patient, to death.

Note to Obama: Grow a set!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Two crack head presidents in succession
Posted by: dan10opa on Dec 26, 2009 6:08 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Has anyone given some serious thought to the concept that people who've had abusive relationships with hardcore drugs (coke, alcoholic, heroin, crystal meth) should never, ever be allowed to be president? Add Billshit Clinton (abandonment issue, uncontrollable masturbatory ego, denial of self worth, sex addict)to the mix and you've got one truly messed up country. What the fuck?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Proof? Posted by: dan10opa
» RE: You are a moron... Posted by: dan10opa

Comments are closed-

The truth that won't go away
Posted by: GPFrank on Dec 26, 2009 6:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I had been thinking all along that with that first solid Republican anti-bipartisanship demonstration of January a year ago Obama should have gone ahead and done what "he" wanted. But that would require a personality like that of Rahm Emmanuel. But the existing Rahm ,one of the Chicago "king makers" believes too much in the Bill Clinton Neocon-lite politics.

The comment about community organizers is a good one. But the mega-banks and Wall Street
speculators with their K street lobby are the least like a community one could ever imagine.
South Chicago and Washington are on two different planets.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

With friends like....
Posted by: timenotonmyside on Dec 26, 2009 6:40 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Geithner, Summers, Rubin, Emanuel, and McChrystal it's easy to BLOW and BLOW REAL GOOD.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Bull's Eye !!! Posted by: godsbreath64
» RE: Bull's Eye !!! Posted by: TheUsualSuspects

Comments are closed-

Obama Is Performing as Planned
Posted by: patriciat on Dec 26, 2009 7:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama hasn't sold out, or failed. It's business as planned. He gets elected and Wallstreet moves in on the same day he does. Progressives are moved out after the election. When Howard "can't be bought" Dean was shot down by the media, cutting out background cheering and making him sound like an idiot, did the Dems protest? Dean can't be controlled...he is courageous, but had no chance. During the debates, questions were directed to Obama and Clinton and, occasionally, Edwards, leaving Kucinich, when asked about God in the White House, to respond that he had been praying for 45 minutes to have a question directed at him so he could say something. The Dems and the Repubs are bought by corporate money. The world order powers must get a good laugh at us dumb folk who thought that Obama talked pretty so must be a good guy...Follow the money!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Exactly! Nice post! n/m Posted by: Paul_C

Comments are closed-

Intention not Incompetence
Posted by: alternet1 on Dec 26, 2009 8:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am so supremely sick and tired of these left gatewaykeepers like Amy Goodman and Naomi Klein giving a pass to Obama for just "missing" opportunities. Obama knows exactly what he is doing because he is taking orders from the bankster elites like the Rothschilds and Rockefellers. Stop the lies!!!!! He's bought and paid for just like a slave. How ironic that the first black president on the outside is actually white and Jewish on the inside. Obama was sent to exacerbate the division within America so the elite could accelerate their timeline for the demise of the US because people were starting to wake up. Watch Wake Up TV, 911missinglinks and iamthewitness.com. 99.9% of the people on GCN, including that fat liar Alex Jones, are owned by the Zionists. Don't listen to anyone that doesn't talk about Mossad's role in 9/11. They are disinfo agents, including Jesse Ventura.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Where is the change
Posted by: finefroghair on Dec 26, 2009 8:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does Obama love this country
It hardly even shows
Look at what's transpired
And how it really blows

The banks are given bailouts
While main street's sucking tit
The richest mother fuckers
Demand more and will not quit

The president is always obliging
To the lobbyists and their whores
While the poorest of our people
Crawl around on shit stained floors

It is said we're rushing head long
Towards our stupid reckless doom
And now this President is complicit
It will be emblazoned on his tomb

We thought we elected a leader
And now we've been proved wrong
I guess we will wait forever
Until a real one comes along

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Where is the change Posted by: BulldogRedeemer

Comments are closed-

New Majority
Posted by: angryblkman on Dec 26, 2009 9:07 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This kind of child like petulance is ridiculous. Are these people this stupid? America is in the grip of the rich and corrupt. They have a solid block of racist and stupid voters they can count on and NO ONE PERSON can fix this mess. With these Libs and friends Obama doesn't need enemies

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Obama? Just say No
Posted by: garnet igneous on Dec 26, 2009 9:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our fearful leader hasn't "blown" anything. Like the tool before him, he serves his masters well, and will continue to do so until we have the collective backbone to put an end to the dark and greedy shenanigans of the controlling elite.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

China and India are to blame for the failures
Posted by: bigbrother on Dec 26, 2009 10:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in Copenhagen. Obama had no experience to change anything. He's along for the ride.

What did anyone expect, we elected someone who never had to negotiate anything, run anything, or plan anything.

If we wanted results re the stim plan, bank bailouts, auto bailouts, and global warming we should have elected Romney.

We want feel good speeches, we elected Obama!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Obama already got what he wanted
Posted by: DaTruth on Dec 26, 2009 11:11 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He got his place in History as the 1st negro president. He also got his Nobel Peace Prize (undeserved). He also has a lavish getaway home in Hawaii. He got what he wanted, we didn't!

He's got to keep his masters happy. So the criminal wars will go on. The change that you can believe in dissipated the very first day he became president. All he needed was to lie to us (we were desperate for change after 8 horrendous years with an idiot at the helm) and we (most of us) voted for him. Once in power, it is just a matter of doing as he is told. The hell with change, the economy, citizens and their rights.

There's no such thing as democracy in America. Anyone who rises to the spotlight is BOUGHT AND PAID FOR. The game is fixed and WE THE PEOPLE lost.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Hail to the Thief
Posted by: Raytan on Dec 26, 2009 12:54 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So if only Obama stole money from the right people and gave it to the right people (presumably the poor, or the writer of this article) then he would be good?

Stealing is stealing. It's wrong, period. The act taints whatever you do with the stolen goods subsequently, and as we all know the government doesn't steal our money through taxation just to give it back to us, it instead gives it to the war profiteers and the banksters.

Read:

http://bastiat.org/en/the_law.html

http://mises.org/Books/mysteryofbanking.pdf

http://www.lewrockwell.com/dilorenzo/dilorenzo180.html

http://voluntaryist.com/fundamentals/introduction.php

Support voluntaryism - oppose government. And remember: no one has the right to rule you without your consent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

HE didn't blow it...
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford on Dec 26, 2009 2:50 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... WE did.

WE were suckered into the "Obama-Mania" that swept this country in 2007 and 2008. WE were the ones who blew it.

We went for the new, shiny thing, because it looked infinitely preferable to the old, worn-out bagpipe known as McCain.

What we seemed to forget is that we were still electing "The lesser of two evils."

Obama was not "the most liberal man in the senate," as senile Johnny Boy tried to portray him during the campaign race.

Obama was a moderate at best and a corporate sympathizer at worst.

All the REAL liberals out there like Kucinich, Dean, etc were COMPLETELY washed over.

Why?

Because liberals are far fewer in number than people think.

Moderates and imbeciles who like Obama only for his dark complexion are the people who got him elected.

Suckered people like my wife and I are are also people who got him elected, but IMMEDIATELY saw the error of our ways.

It's not "well, if your first choice fails, then you'd better just go for the next best thing and be damned grateful that Obama won at all."

That's bullshit.
Complete and utterly unadulterated bullshit.

No.

No more compromise.
No more "suck it up, we lost" mentality.
No more excuses.
No more politics.

We true progressives know Obama is just another cog in the huge machine of the corporate military-industrial complex. It's powered by our sweat and it's oiled with our blood.

It ISN'T going away, and it's a fool's errand to continue fighting it directly as we're doing now.

No, I'm not saying give up.
I'm saying there's another way.

It's called secession.
New England and the West Coast are the two bastions of liberal thought left in this country. Everything else East of the Colorado River and West of the Hudson River is contaminated "Jesusland corporatocracy."

Break the west coast off from America. Make a new nation out of it.
Make the New England states into a nation unto themselves.

Nothing shakes people out of apathy like a dramatic example, and for TRUE liberals to get up and walk out on a greedy, war-mongering EMPIRE (especially after our hopes and dreams were shattered by this last election's failure of a progressive) is the greatest example of all.

Secede.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: HE didn't blow it... Posted by: richholland
» RE: HE didn't blow it... Posted by: Rusty Shackleford
» RE: HE didn't blow it... Posted by: rdrjames

Comments are closed-

Nexus
Posted by: Nexus on Dec 26, 2009 3:12 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is hard to see how the US can survive in its current form both politically and socially – it is a bit like the decline of Rome which disintegrated internally and ultimately could not sustain its military and secure its borders. Naomi Klein’s observations are symptomatic of a policy and strategy malaise.

The political system provides a veneer of democracy but is hardly democratic as it is the ‘power elite’, to coin a term from C Wright Mills (The Power Elite), which control all the agendas.

The hollowing out of the US economy will accelerate via the increased transfer of manufacturing capacity to China and knowledge work to India instead of fostering productive capacity and capability in the US. Granted the US still has the largest manufacturing sector in the world but many sectors have been lost or greatly eroded or are reliant on military expenditure. The US military will need to be supported by a rapidly diminishing base of wealth creation and loss of ‘treasury’ and will become increasingly parasitic and a burden.

There has been a progressive and massive transfer of wealth to a small corporate and financial ‘elite’ via idiotic tax cuts (based on decidedly loopy economic theories) and more recently directly from the working and middle class to the financial elites via the ineffectual stimulus package and massive financial support given to the banks in order to prop up the financial system. The logical deduction from this is that very soon health, education, social services, etc, will have to be slashed to the bone to try and balance the budget and this will catapult many Americans into extreme levels of poverty.

The philosophy of those that rule the US is highly illogical as everything they have been doing over the last 20 years or so has been making the US weaker – ultimately military strength has to be underpinned by wealth created by a healthy economy not on the willingness of foreigners to hold debt. This approach has simply pandered to a narrow group of elites at the expense of the broader US community.

For the US to be strong you would actually expect policy makers to have made many decisions that are contrary to the ones they have made historically:

1.Tax cuts reduced to strengthen the middle and working classes;
2.Preference for US trained citizens over overseas labour;
3.Investment in US trained labour and capital across the board in key industry sectors;
4.Soft force projection via productive investment in overseas countries (not military occupation which is a drain on the Treasury);
5.Nationalisation of the banks and re-engineering of the financial system (the bankers pay for their debt binge);
6.Conversion of delinquent mortgages to very low interest and long term government loans to keep people in their homes and functioning as citizens (1% or so);
7.Elimination of the Federal Reserve which is a private entity and simply a front for the greedy and failed banks (to be replaced by a public entity – a US bank of national reconstruction);
8.National health care – the adoption of a single health care delivery framework leading to the elimination of the parasitic health insurance companies (they add no vale and simply make health care expensive, not universally accessible and the recently passed bill really does little to address this).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Why blame Obama?
Posted by: editorsteve on Dec 26, 2009 3:20 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Last I heard, politics is the art of the attainable. Obama is not a dictator. He's a president. He was also the most liberal Senator, by voting record. But why blame him for not expending political capital on things he can't attain at any political price?

Oh, of course. The far left would rather tear down the Democrats to help more Republicans get elected. I forgot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Obama has done a lot of good
Posted by: intothewild on Dec 26, 2009 6:25 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stop the whining folks. The President has only been in office for eleven months. More than likely by the end of his first term Independents and Democrats will be singing a different tune. Right now there a lot of things not moving along in the House or Senate. Too many old fogies more worried about saving their seat or bickering like little school girls than helping Americans. We are one of the largest most developed nations, yet are one of the most ass backward one as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

RIDICULOUS
Posted by: marat on Dec 26, 2009 8:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Noami Klein has some reality problems. There she was in Copenhagen telling struggling under developed countries that they must "leap frog" over fossil fuels.

Did she leap-frog over to Copenhagen?

The hyprocrisy of Klein and other liberals who fly around the world telling people how to live their lives devoid of fossil fuels must be condemned for the great harm they want to do to others while wearing a halo around their intellectually barren heads.

I have come to despise these people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

What's PUMA for "I told you so"?
Posted by: Perry Logan on Dec 27, 2009 2:59 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As one who saw through Obama almost instantly, I'm puzzling over how any progressive could fall for this guy for even a minute.

I'm not talking about Obama's obvious speech impediment (i.e., he whistles his s's like a teakettle). I'm not talking about Obama's fans, who are foul-mouthed Philistines.

I'm talking about his pre-Presidential record, which would have made it clear he has not a progressive bone in his body. Example: he voted for the Cheney energy bill, which no Democrat would do. This and a lot of other red flags would have come up with a quick Google search.

In the future, progressives are urged to vet their candidates. Steer away from candidates who fight dirty against women and call their fellow Democrats racists. These are not good signs.

I can only assume progressives were so bummed by George W. Bush that they went nuts and saw what they wanted to see in Obama, paying no attention to what was really there. In this they are only human.

Some of them even said Obama was a great orator. These must be the same people who think "South Park" is brilliant. ;)

The scary part is, the same progressives who voted for Obama are going to vote again, assuming we ever have another election over here. Since we obviously need educating, I wanted to note a correlation which might help us in the future.

There is a strong correlation between people who fell for Obama and people who hate the Clintons. Thought this might be useful.

Progressives with their panties in a wad about the Clintons thought Obama would be great, while progressives, like me, who have no particular animus toward the Clinton clan, saw through Obama instantly. That seems to be the variable.

This confirms what any casual observer can see--Clinton haters are full of sh*t. If the Clinton Derangement crowd (HuffPo, Democratic Underground, DailyKos, Buzzflash) like a candidate, he/she is a bad candidate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

No Pres. since FDR has been handed the opportunities...
Posted by: jimidee on Dec 27, 2009 6:35 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please, Naomi, spare me the lecture about blown opportunities because the President only has so much power. You say that you understand about the Senate...do you...DO YOU?

Many folks (as some that have already posted on this admit) are disappointed that Obama is not the "Messiah". Ha! Obama was not, and never will be the Messiah...you guys had unreasonable expectations. He's the freaking President, and only the President, whom is dealing with a antagonistic and broken Senate, where every bill has to meet an unrealistic 60 votes. The broken Senate IS he bottleneck that is very real, and saying that you understand this and then discount it is unrealistic. Your expectations are your fault, not Obama's...so don't lay that at his feet.

Obama is changing things in his thoughtful and pragmatic way, and taking the hit in his popularity polls for these actions. His support was on thin ice with many independents, needing only a little bad weather to change their opinions of him. His political capital was therefore, tenuous at best. Then there is that Senate thang again.

There are just SO many things that need fixing, things that he inherited and that he had no part in their creation. Why do you think that he has dropped 20 points in the last 6 months? He is taking the hit from folks like you too, even though there are lots of other reasons besides the fact that he has only been in for less than a year.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

RE: "The only thing Obama is good at is giving speeches!"
Posted by: jimidee on Dec 27, 2009 12:17 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, Jes, he's one up on you there...you aren't even any good at writing posts. What possible benefit does your post have?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Obama is weak and conservative
Posted by: yankee2 on Dec 27, 2009 10:01 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Obama, who presented himself as the most liberal, leftist president in American history, and who was elected on that platform, suffers from the very problem I feared he would before he took office: He's far too conservative, and weak.

WEAK? Yes, for all his competence, he refuses to fight for us. That makes him virtually useless.

Rather than being the vehicle for a bright new future, he's become one for a much darker, radically more conservative regime in the future.

The CHANGE he sold us? Nothing more than a dream, unless he finally wakes up and actually does something for us, FOR A CHANGE.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

I regret my vote for Obama and the gubernatorial results in VA and even liberal NJ are showing
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 27, 2009 10:06 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
buyers' remorse and dissatisfaction with this administration. I anticipate this PUBLIC LAVA to spread nationwide and the chances of landslide defeats for the Democratic Party in 2010 and 2012 are increasing. Never before have we had such a Democratic administration ready to work so hard to defeat itself and its own party. Even Bill Clinton wasn't as much a shithead though he sucked too. Obama had all the opportunities to prove himself better but he fucking blew it. Unless he turns around and fast, he's history come November 2012. Already, Obama is making Bush 1 look "liberal" and he might make Bush 2 as well by the end of his term. It can be generally agreed that Obama has proudly chosen to be a one-term president with no honor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Their Man...
Posted by: Captainmagic on Dec 27, 2009 3:22 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What happens when their man goes rogue..... Mmmmmmmm. What lengths did THEY go to to get their man Saddam Hussein.

Put all the dots together and hey presto!

None of what you have been fed is true...

THEIR reality has been shown but has failed miserably because the rest of the world now knows the game so well that we intervene all the time.

Sorry but you guys can't do it because you are too close to the fire...

A poster above has America as still the worlds biggest manufacturer and on a singular scale that may be true... but we of the rest of the world are moving closer together as one... You either join or go into the dustbin. E.O.S.

The day is drawing inevitably closer when you will travel all over the world and see the relics of amerikan power...

Deserted military bases.

Captain OUT

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Blown Opportunities?
Posted by: Deep on Dec 27, 2009 4:18 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The stimulus package should have been much bigger. More geared towards alternative transportation and infrastructure towards alternative energy. I agree with Paul Krugman with that we might need another stimulus package in the very near future. But that does not the current stimulus package is not working. According to the CBO, as of this month, the stimulus help save or create between 600,000-1.6 million jobs. It help grow the economy, and even shrink the unemployment rate.


You cannot find a more despicable peice of human flesh than Tom Coburn of Oklahoma. But so long as him and his ilk are in Congress, we will still have to seek to reach out to the Republicans. Whether the Republicans want to actually cross the aisle or not is up to them, but they can't say we didn't ask.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

What Should be the Priority?
Posted by: Nexus on Dec 27, 2009 4:35 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
America annually spends more ($880 billion) on its military than all state or local governments do combined (around $780billion) to provide citizen services.

Each year, the US DoD expenditures exceeds that of all 50 states combined in providing medical services, educating children, offering a safety net to the poor and protecting citizens against crime and natural disasters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

The messiah has arrived: Naomi Klein
Posted by: leonardfeingold on Dec 27, 2009 5:42 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Apparantly all progressives take for granted that there is AGW just like very religious folks expect the messiah.
Anyone who is not a skeptic(as opposed to a denier) about catastrophic AGW is a fanatic. The evidence(as opposed to anecedotes about polar bears etc) is not just there to make decisions amounting to trillions of dollars. I felt this way before the incriminating emails which indicate a corruption of science. But progressives are like religious fanatics. It got to a point that AGW scientists had to cover up the little ice age and MEW that followed to show that we are now in the warmest period ever in the universe. That is like fundementalists denying archaelogical evidence and fossil evidence so they hang onto Genesis. So progressives are just another fundmentalist religion and Al Gore the new Jesus and Klein the apostle Paul.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

#1-It hasn't even been a year yet. #2-He can't do it alone. #3-Opportunities? You mean disasters
Posted by: judette on Dec 27, 2009 6:22 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Disasters he is trying to dig us out of. Unfortunately he has to deal with the greedy "Party of NO" that cares more about their reelections, than the American people and critics that have never been in Obama's shoes, but have mighty big opinions. Well, I am so thankful that Obama is our president and think he is doing a superb job for not even being in office a year. Too bad I can't say the same about Congress. We need a whole new Congress, of which there are not 235 millionaires bought by guess who? That's who you should be writing about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

WILSON WAS UNABLE TO GET CONGRESS TO APPROVE THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS. IT
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Dec 27, 2009 8:10 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
eventually took Harry Truman to do the job. The republican congress that dumped the Leaqgue of Nations may well deserve the blame for the 2nd World War. Do you think that this congress is led, driven, by different forces.

Without an act of congress can we see change? The money has to come out of politics. Only congress has the power to reform itself. Only we have the power to change congress that much. What are we waiting for?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yuck! Posted by: logansafi

Comments are closed-

video converter for mac
Posted by: wetwe on Jan 11, 2010 4:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I TOLD you over and over again the truth about the a-hole... NOW at last you finally see it.
Bet you're wishing you didn't stab you’ in the back NOW, huh?
MKV Converter for Mac\MKV to WMV MAC\MKV to PSP MAC\MKV to iPod MAC\MKV to Xbox MAC\MKV to iPhone MAC\MKV to Apple TV MAC

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

with key details
Posted by: avatarhuman on Jan 13, 2010 5:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Copenhagen Accord is clearly a work in progress, with key details such as the emissions reduction targets for industrialized countries and emissions mitigation actions of developing countries to be filled in later. It is also a voluntary framework, with negotiations to continue in 2010 toward a legally binding instrument that would either accompany or supersede the Kyoto Protocol. MTS to MPEG

The case for the U.S. entering into an international global warming treaty took a significant blow at the latest failed United Nations climate conference in Copenhagen. Not only did the conference fail to reach a meaningful agreement, but that failure will further jeopardize any action on global warming by an already skeptical U.S. Senate. Convert MTS to MPEG

It didn’t move us the way we need to ... The science says that we’ve got to significantly reduce emissions over the next — over the next 40 years. There’s nothing in the Copenhagen agreement that ensures that that happens. MTS to MPEG Converter

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

HD video converter
Posted by: jackwen on Jan 14, 2010 9:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hello, i've found two websites Tod Converter | Mod Converter and wanted to share it with you. Good quality and my order arrived in time. Cheers

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

merhaba
Posted by: lovemaker on Jan 16, 2010 1:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]

Comments are closed-

Please
Posted by: DavidSleep on Jan 18, 2010 11:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
 
Reverend Billy Talen
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS