COMMENTS: 32
The Vampire Banks Are Back: Will There Ever Be Meaningful Financial Reform?
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest News & Politics headlines via email.
There are more than 15 million people unemployed and almost 2 million people set to lose their homes to foreclosure this year. But there is good news: the Wall Street banks are as profitable as ever and set to give out record bonuses this year. The taxpayer bailouts worked.
Congress is now debating a financial reform bill that is supposed to prevent this sort of disaster from ever happening again. Leaders in Congress are promising us tough measures that will put an end to “too big to fail” institutions and the other implicit and explicit subsidies that allow the Wall Street crew to get incredibly wealthy at our expense.
It’s still an open question as to whether this reform effort will just be a pointless source of greenhouse gas emissions. If the goal were to fix the financial system, then the process would not be difficult. But the halls of Congress are infested with financial industry lobbyists. As a result, the bills being put forward are written like the adjustable rate subprime mortgages that helped get us into this mess. The wording often leads to bills that do the exact opposite of the stated meaning.
For example, the wording of a section of the House Financial Services committee bill that was intended to regulate derivatives trading included an "end user" exemption. This exemption would have given Enron a green light to carry on its shady dealings in over-the-counter transactions out of sight of any regulators.
After a bill to audit the Federal Reserve Board garnered 311 co-sponsors in the House, the financial industry’s lobbyists got a member to put up an alternative amendment for an audit. The only problem was that this alternative "audit" bill would essentially have prevented an audit.
In another coup, there was an amendment put forward by Representative Paul Kanjorski that would allow the Fed to break up banks that pose a danger to the financial system. This garnered support from many who understood the bill to require the breakup of J.P. Morgan, Citigroup, and other "too big to fail" institutions.
But this interpretation wrongly assumed that the amendment actually had some meaning. The authors of this amendment contend that no breakup of these giants is required because they do not pose a threat to the financial system at this moment. This assertion is of course absurd, because at a point where the collapse of one of these institutions does pose a threat to the financial system it will not be of any benefit to break them up.
It wouldn’t have helped anything to break Lehman or AIG up into five different companies at the point where they were collapsing in September of 2008. The authors of these bills understand this fact -- there are just treating the public like their subprime borrowers; suckers to be taken for a ride.
There are thousands of details that are a necessary part of any financial reform bill, but there is a simple way to know whether it was worth the effort. If the Wall Street banks are still in place, earning the same profits and paying the same bonuses, then there was no reform. There was just a pointless charade.
Much is still up in the air. To everyone’s shock, the bogus Fed audit amendment was defeated in committee. A determined effort by Alan Grayson, one of the real audit bill’s lead sponsors, along with impressive work from grassroots/netroots activists, hardened the opposition.
There is growing support to impose a modest tax on financial transactions. This tax would be a body blow to the Wall Street speculators while leaving middle class investors largely unaffected. It could also raise more than a $1 trillion over the next decade to help the country recover from the damage inflicted by the Wall Street crew.
It is possible to design financial reform that will actually implement the changes needed to have a more efficient and a more fair financial industry. There also is enormous public support for these changes. The question is whether the public will can be harnessed to overcome the financial industry termites that infest every corner of the capital.
Stay up to date with the latest News & Politics headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Perry Logan on Nov 25, 2009 2:33 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Chicago Blue Dog No. 1
Posted by: jstepp590
» RE: Chicago Blue Dog No. 1
Posted by: thehodges1@prodigy.net
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lese Majeste on Nov 25, 2009 3:12 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We think we vote in the prez, but voting is a delusion as the candidates were screened and vetted in advance by Wall Street con artists and Zionist and Neocon war mongers.
Obama will continue on with the 'Wars for Wall Street and Israel,' sending our kids off to die to keep those Afghan poppy fields safe for Wall Street banks and to establish bases close to the oil and natural gas fields of the Caspian Basin and to surround another of Israel's 'existential' enemies, Iran, with troops and weapons.
90% of the Congress are cheap, blood sucking whores who sold out a long time ago and don't give a damn about We the People.
So either get used to living like slaves or get up on your two feet and start doing something useful like learning how to make a Guillotine.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Doesn't matter if it's the Dems or Repubs in power, we'll still get screwed
Posted by: union steamfitter
» RE: Doesn't matter if it's the Dems or Repubs in power, we'll still get screwed
Posted by: tsakovs
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CTC123 on Nov 25, 2009 4:31 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The NEGATIVE Economic Pyramid
Where is the NEGATIVE Economic Pyramid?
www.facebook.com Jerry Lee Mayeux
PROFILE-INFO-PHOTO Album
Great article,Dean Baker
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: franklyspanking on Nov 25, 2009 5:29 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wait! Aren't democrats different from republicans?
Let's see...
perpetual war on Tara
cronyism
policies to drag the nation further into debt
no long term, sustainable fiscal policy of any sort
Wow, I guess the only difference between the democrats and republicans is that the republicans never enjoyed a supermajority during the prior 8 years, and only a majority in both houses for half of the remainder. They had to negotiate in order to wreck the country. Good thing that democrats are able to do it all by themselves!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Another lie from Spank Frank...
Posted by: LightningJoe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sayward2 on Nov 25, 2009 5:44 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» As long as Americans support the Fascist parties--the Demopubicans--...
Posted by: Prinzowhales
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mnstra on Nov 25, 2009 8:39 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: hi
Posted by: LightningJoe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: swooshy on Nov 25, 2009 6:22 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IS THIS MIKE NOT ON HERE????
The credit card companies were allowed a FREE PASS to continue their practice of perfecting usury. This so-called recovery has not filtered down to a Main Street which provides the bulk of jobs in this country. It's a safe bet (and I'll bet they skew this info as long as possible) that the decline in jobs, sales and consumer spending can be traced right to the banks and credit card co'.s pockets.
The parasitic class that sits in the Senate needs to be fired.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: We've got an economic Afghanistan going on here
Posted by: JSquercia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Richardsievert on Nov 25, 2009 6:34 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Will change there mind's now?
Please answer me
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Please answer me
Posted by: jstepp590
» RE: Please answer me
Posted by: LightningJoe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: unsaneviews on Nov 25, 2009 7:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But, alas, we do have power. We have the power to hold back our credit card payments, and our mortgage payments. Imagine if we all did this, all at once, without warning. Could they enlists enough cops and legal means to come after us all, or would they be forced to negotiate. I wonder?!?!?!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Oh, if only the people really had
Posted by: 3rdI
Comments are closed-
Posted by: frankly1 on Nov 25, 2009 8:45 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jstepp590 on Nov 25, 2009 9:32 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If they were serious they don't have to create a new bill. All the have to do is repeal Gramm-Leach-Bailey and reinstate Glass Steagall verbatum. Any firms that don't meet that regulation should be given one year to be broken up before the government seizes it and auctions it off for them.
We functioned for over 70yrs under Glass Steagall without these problems. Nothing else is going to fix it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: linecrosser on Nov 25, 2009 10:17 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I hate to say it, "But not me"
Posted by: Richardsievert
» RE: I hate to say it,
Posted by: LightningJoe
» RE:my brain on
Posted by: linecrosser
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Nov 25, 2009 11:15 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
2)Congress is no longer able to accept any money from PACs, Individuals, Corporations, et. al....
3)We the people awaken and recognize that it really has been and continues to be a class war on everyone that isn't part of the Oligarchy!!!!!!
4)Common sense, logic, and reasoning trumps all religion, because in America there is supposed to be a separation of church & State!!!!!
Then and only then will we be able to break the hold of the Oligarchy, and beat the barbarians back behind the gates, and install rules & regulations to keep these buzzards from ripping our nation to shreds!!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Until...........
Posted by: LightningJoe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Prinzowhales on Nov 26, 2009 6:18 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The biggest cost of a home in most cases is the interest. Most, if not all, of the 'money' you borrow is created out of nothing by the fractional reserve banking system--but you pay interest on the whole amount. If this system were rationalized and government run, the money could be created in the same manner without the interest--or at a minimal charge to cover the costs of carrying the loan.
People could then buy better houses, be secure in their homes and not face foreclosure if they lost their jobs--payments could be tacked on to the end of the loan. We would not face 2 million people losing their homes in the coming year and the social costs that this entails or the costs of bailing out usurers to save a bankrupt system that has proven itself time and again an enemy of the people.
More money going toward actual housing rather than interest would employ workers and lead to real wealth-building rather than the paper wealth of Wall Street and the dirty usurers.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LightningJoe on Nov 27, 2009 12:46 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The operating assumption when dealing with business's efforts at "facilitating" legislation, should be that EVERYTHING business wants to do, is in frank service to its bottom line, AT THE EXPENSE of their customer's welfare. Any benefit for customers costs the business, so they want to present THE APPEARANCE of a benefit, and actually give the customer, preferably, nothing at all. Of course they still have to attract the customer, so offering them nothing at all may not work so well -- unless the customer has no choice in the matter (monopoly, or mandates).
When business comes up with a plan to make choices "easier" for the consumer, it is safe to assume that it's either a lie, or competition. If that plan is approached through legislation, it is a lie. It's also very safe to simply ASSUME that the proposed plan is the seed of some sort of manipulation of those who now have the money, in order to take it away from them.
PERMANENT SUSPICION is really the only sane response, to what we've seen our business community is capable of -- and in fact partial to. Their greed even outstrips their economic principles and education. It makes no economics sense at all, to set up a system that enriches the top five percent only, and drives the rest of us into the dank basement. Those who become the working poor -- or simply the poor -- can contribute very little to the economy with our soon-to-be two dollars per day. And, absent an absolutely heartless social culture (true, they're working on that one...) the poor become an ever-greater burden on the government and therefore on the citizen. Not to mention the growing threat of armed revolt.
And believe me, when the wool falls from the poor's eyes, they WILL know who needs to be shot.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bondwooley on Nov 27, 2009 7:29 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Boycott Brigade
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Makaainana on Nov 28, 2009 10:01 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NO
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Perry Logan on Nov 25, 2009 2:33 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Chicago Blue Dog No. 1
Posted by: jstepp590
» RE: Chicago Blue Dog No. 1
Posted by: thehodges1@prodigy.net
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lese Majeste on Nov 25, 2009 3:12 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We think we vote in the prez, but voting is a delusion as the candidates were screened and vetted in advance by Wall Street con artists and Zionist and Neocon war mongers.
Obama will continue on with the 'Wars for Wall Street and Israel,' sending our kids off to die to keep those Afghan poppy fields safe for Wall Street banks and to establish bases close to the oil and natural gas fields of the Caspian Basin and to surround another of Israel's 'existential' enemies, Iran, with troops and weapons.
90% of the Congress are cheap, blood sucking whores who sold out a long time ago and don't give a damn about We the People.
So either get used to living like slaves or get up on your two feet and start doing something useful like learning how to make a Guillotine.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Doesn't matter if it's the Dems or Repubs in power, we'll still get screwed
Posted by: union steamfitter
» RE: Doesn't matter if it's the Dems or Repubs in power, we'll still get screwed
Posted by: tsakovs
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CTC123 on Nov 25, 2009 4:31 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The NEGATIVE Economic Pyramid
Where is the NEGATIVE Economic Pyramid?
www.facebook.com Jerry Lee Mayeux
PROFILE-INFO-PHOTO Album
Great article,Dean Baker
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: franklyspanking on Nov 25, 2009 5:29 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wait! Aren't democrats different from republicans?
Let's see...
perpetual war on Tara
cronyism
policies to drag the nation further into debt
no long term, sustainable fiscal policy of any sort
Wow, I guess the only difference between the democrats and republicans is that the republicans never enjoyed a supermajority during the prior 8 years, and only a majority in both houses for half of the remainder. They had to negotiate in order to wreck the country. Good thing that democrats are able to do it all by themselves!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Another lie from Spank Frank...
Posted by: LightningJoe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sayward2 on Nov 25, 2009 5:44 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» As long as Americans support the Fascist parties--the Demopubicans--...
Posted by: Prinzowhales
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mnstra on Nov 25, 2009 8:39 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: hi
Posted by: LightningJoe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: swooshy on Nov 25, 2009 6:22 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IS THIS MIKE NOT ON HERE????
The credit card companies were allowed a FREE PASS to continue their practice of perfecting usury. This so-called recovery has not filtered down to a Main Street which provides the bulk of jobs in this country. It's a safe bet (and I'll bet they skew this info as long as possible) that the decline in jobs, sales and consumer spending can be traced right to the banks and credit card co'.s pockets.
The parasitic class that sits in the Senate needs to be fired.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: We've got an economic Afghanistan going on here
Posted by: JSquercia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Richardsievert on Nov 25, 2009 6:34 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Will change there mind's now?
Please answer me
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Please answer me
Posted by: jstepp590
» RE: Please answer me
Posted by: LightningJoe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: unsaneviews on Nov 25, 2009 7:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But, alas, we do have power. We have the power to hold back our credit card payments, and our mortgage payments. Imagine if we all did this, all at once, without warning. Could they enlists enough cops and legal means to come after us all, or would they be forced to negotiate. I wonder?!?!?!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Oh, if only the people really had
Posted by: 3rdI
Comments are closed-
Posted by: frankly1 on Nov 25, 2009 8:45 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jstepp590 on Nov 25, 2009 9:32 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If they were serious they don't have to create a new bill. All the have to do is repeal Gramm-Leach-Bailey and reinstate Glass Steagall verbatum. Any firms that don't meet that regulation should be given one year to be broken up before the government seizes it and auctions it off for them.
We functioned for over 70yrs under Glass Steagall without these problems. Nothing else is going to fix it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: linecrosser on Nov 25, 2009 10:17 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I hate to say it, "But not me"
Posted by: Richardsievert
» RE: I hate to say it,
Posted by: LightningJoe
» RE:my brain on
Posted by: linecrosser
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Nov 25, 2009 11:15 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
2)Congress is no longer able to accept any money from PACs, Individuals, Corporations, et. al....
3)We the people awaken and recognize that it really has been and continues to be a class war on everyone that isn't part of the Oligarchy!!!!!!
4)Common sense, logic, and reasoning trumps all religion, because in America there is supposed to be a separation of church & State!!!!!
Then and only then will we be able to break the hold of the Oligarchy, and beat the barbarians back behind the gates, and install rules & regulations to keep these buzzards from ripping our nation to shreds!!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Until...........
Posted by: LightningJoe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Prinzowhales on Nov 26, 2009 6:18 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The biggest cost of a home in most cases is the interest. Most, if not all, of the 'money' you borrow is created out of nothing by the fractional reserve banking system--but you pay interest on the whole amount. If this system were rationalized and government run, the money could be created in the same manner without the interest--or at a minimal charge to cover the costs of carrying the loan.
People could then buy better houses, be secure in their homes and not face foreclosure if they lost their jobs--payments could be tacked on to the end of the loan. We would not face 2 million people losing their homes in the coming year and the social costs that this entails or the costs of bailing out usurers to save a bankrupt system that has proven itself time and again an enemy of the people.
More money going toward actual housing rather than interest would employ workers and lead to real wealth-building rather than the paper wealth of Wall Street and the dirty usurers.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LightningJoe on Nov 27, 2009 12:46 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The operating assumption when dealing with business's efforts at "facilitating" legislation, should be that EVERYTHING business wants to do, is in frank service to its bottom line, AT THE EXPENSE of their customer's welfare. Any benefit for customers costs the business, so they want to present THE APPEARANCE of a benefit, and actually give the customer, preferably, nothing at all. Of course they still have to attract the customer, so offering them nothing at all may not work so well -- unless the customer has no choice in the matter (monopoly, or mandates).
When business comes up with a plan to make choices "easier" for the consumer, it is safe to assume that it's either a lie, or competition. If that plan is approached through legislation, it is a lie. It's also very safe to simply ASSUME that the proposed plan is the seed of some sort of manipulation of those who now have the money, in order to take it away from them.
PERMANENT SUSPICION is really the only sane response, to what we've seen our business community is capable of -- and in fact partial to. Their greed even outstrips their economic principles and education. It makes no economics sense at all, to set up a system that enriches the top five percent only, and drives the rest of us into the dank basement. Those who become the working poor -- or simply the poor -- can contribute very little to the economy with our soon-to-be two dollars per day. And, absent an absolutely heartless social culture (true, they're working on that one...) the poor become an ever-greater burden on the government and therefore on the citizen. Not to mention the growing threat of armed revolt.
And believe me, when the wool falls from the poor's eyes, they WILL know who needs to be shot.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bondwooley on Nov 27, 2009 7:29 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Boycott Brigade
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Makaainana on Nov 28, 2009 10:01 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NO
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
When Will Obama Stop Trying to Work with Republicans?
Sarah Palin Aims to Bust Up the Republican Party -- And the Tea Party Movement
White Racial Resentment Bubbles Under the Surface of the Tea Party Movement




