COMMENTS: 72
The Right Isn't Only Trying to Take Down ACORN, It's Got a 25-Year Project to 'Defund' the Left
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest News & Politics headlines via email.
When Michele Bachman crowed in September that the exposure of alleged illegal activity by the anti-poverty group ACORN was just the start of a campaign to "defund the left," she may have revealed more about current Republican strategy than she intended.
“Defunding the left is going to be so easy,” Bachmann told the audience at a conservative conference, “and it’s going to solve so many of our problems.”
The Senate and House had just voted to cut off ACORN's federal funding in what CBS/AP called "a GOP-led strike against the scandal-tainted community organizing group" that followed the release of video showing ACORN employees apparently endorsing illegal activities, The bills passed by lopsided majorities, with many Democrats joining Republicans, and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi told a news conference, "We have to have our own scrutiny of an organization with an allegation of this kind against it."
The initial Congressional defunding of ACORN was scheduled to expire at the end of October, however, causing Bachman to warn a bloggers' conference at the ultra-conservative Heritage Foundation, "This is the biggest trick or treat. On November 1 the prohibition will lift."
The Capital Research Center
The idea of starving the Democratic Party of donations by defunding the progressive non-profits that form a central pillar of its support is not new. It goes back to at least 1981, when the Heritage Foundation published a set of over 2000 policy recommendations for the Reagan administration. According to SourceWatch, "One challenge, as Heritage saw it, was to counter the rise of its ideological opponents by whittling away their status as 'public interest' organisations and eliminating federal financial support for 'liberal' groups."
The Capital Research Center (CRC) was founded in 1984 by a former Heritage Foundation vice president to implement this agenda by uncovering the presumably questionable funding sources of progressive groups. CRC's central assumption has always been that "a unified, sophisticated and well-funded philanthropic elite is dedicated to imposing on us the doctrine of 'progressive' philanthropy, doctrines that would reorder our political, economic and cultural priorities."
The CRC selected ACORN as a favored targed long before almost anybody else had heard of the group. In January 2005, Bill Berkowitz, who regularly reports on right-wing organizations, wrote:
"In mid-October of last year, the Center's president, Terence Scanlon, launched a pre-emptive strike against ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) and its voter registration efforts. Scanlon cast a shadow over ACORN's reports that it had registered over one million new voters. He charged that because of irregularities, the organization was coming under scrutiny by lawmakers 'in state after state [where] allegations are surfacing that ACORN activists are padding the registration books'
"As a non-profit community-based organizing group, ACORN has been on the CRC's radar for several years. According to Scanlon, ACORN, with some 150,000 dues-paying members organized into 65 city chapters, 'is better known for public disruption.' Its so-called community organizing 'has relied on in-your-face confrontation,' including a 1995 demonstration targeting then House Speaker Newt Gingrich. 'In 2002 it burst into the Heritage Foundation to harangue welfare reform expert Robert Rector. Dozen of city councils and state legislatures have had to face angry ACORN protesters demanding higher minimum wages and more welfare entitlements. Banks have been pressured to change their lending practices or face ACORN charges of discrimination before regulators.'”
Stay up to date with the latest News & Politics headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Purple Girl on Oct 31, 2009 4:40 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Had the scenario portrayed by these two obvious middle class suburbanites been the reality, what true Chrisitian would deny her 'a room'?
Doesn't this also harken back, in ways, to the Birth of Christ- a woman in need of shelter?
I have no problem with ARCORN finding housing for people who are in such dire straits. For a Prostitute it may mean the chance to secure a real job,because she has a permanent address. Prostitution is a dangerous business which only becomes more risky when working the streets as opposed to being a 'call girl'.
Further those who find themselves resorting to prostitution are likely the vicitms of a dysfunctional family and no real concept of community.Pimp Daddy? Permanent housing could work to add societal pressures and influence on her to find another form of work. And what about those 'working girls' with children? The meager tax dollars used are not worth providing a child with shelter, a chance to attend school, do better than his/her parent in the future. What true American would stand in the way of that?
Besides who wants to see these woman walking their Streets? Performing services on your side streets, as your kids ride by???? "get a Room" isn't just for the participants benefit - but the rest of US as well.
Going after ACORN for this Staged charade expose not only it's initiators and supporters lack of real comprehension of Christianity,and social mindedness, but what the foundation of the 'American Way' means.Having the Right to ascend the socio-economic ladder regardless of your parents social status is innately American.
In fact the anti ACORNers can't even claim to be devote 'Capitalists'. She has a product which the market shows to demand. She is the epitome of the 'small business entrepeneur'.
So who are the real 'sinners' in this situation? Who are the ones forcing prostitution into the streets, exposing children to 'the life', rejecting American Values,and deny people access to the 'Free Market'?
At about $1.25 for every american- may be $3.00 a YEAR for the working tax payer over the last 15 yrs for a mere total of 53 million, the self righteous indignation over this 'sting operation' falls flat.For every MILLION these people freaking out about Top Wall Streeters are walking away with in BILLIONS in personal salaries and comp pkgs THIS YEAR ALONE!!!These dumbass MF'ers are giving up societal Socialism, which benefits The People, for Corporate Socialism.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You Should Be ACORN's Defense Council
Posted by: ChicagoWay
» What you saw was an highly edited piece of propaganda from a proven liar.
Posted by: UnEasyOne
» RE: "Anoint my feet and I'll get you an apartment" ???
Posted by: jvaljon1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: angry_prof on Oct 31, 2009 5:14 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: QQOblivion on Oct 31, 2009 5:53 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I tried to report these comments, but the type-these-letters-you-see challenge wouldn't let me, even when I correctly typed the letters!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yeah, why is it so easy to post spam and so hard to repoprt it?
Posted by: leafsong1
» Ever heard of a bug? After all, you're dealing with a computer.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Ever heard of a bug? Yes, and so has Alternet, endlessly.
Posted by: Amy27605
» RE: it's been reported dozens of times
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» You woudn't know spyware from your @$$, reverend.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Try the "Give me a new set of letters" button.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» I did. That didn't work either.
Posted by: QQOblivion
» You must be persistent
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Muslims Disproportionate Victims of Flawed Terrorist Watch List
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» It must be internet day again at St. Elizabeth's Hospital
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: It must be internet day again at St. Elizabeth's Hospital
Posted by: buschthebearrefreshing
» RE: Hey, Alternet!
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» Yup, it's internet day at St. Elizabeth's hospital again.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Hey, Alternet!
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Hey, Alternet!
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» [expletive deleted] YOU, reverend.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: I reported you for personal attacks.
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» I don't hate you reverend. I pity you, because you belong in a mental hospital.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Personal attacks? What's this, "reverend"?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Hey, Alternet!
Posted by: Ian MacLeod
» RE: Hey, Alternet!
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» More BS, "reverend"?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: I live on terra firma and I will defend her to my last breath
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: I live on terra firma and I will defend her to my last breath
Posted by: grokagain
» RE: I live on terra firma and I will defend her to my last breath
Posted by: buschthebearrefreshing
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bigbrother on Oct 31, 2009 6:04 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As soon as they came out for Obama and campaigned for him, they should have been defunded. The fact that some on the left believes it's ok to have a non profit organization receiving public funds campaign for a particular party demonstrates how corrupt our two party system has become.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Then defund KBR, Blackwater, and others!
Posted by: QQOblivion
» RE: Then defund KBR, Blackwater, and others!
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Then defund KBR, Blackwater, and others!
Posted by: bigbrother
» RE: Then defund KBR, Blackwater, and others!
Posted by: buschthebearrefreshing
» RE: Why the uproar
Posted by: Kathy-B
» RE: Why the uproar
Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: Why the uproar
Posted by: fc7711
» RE: Why the uproar
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» Why the hasty exit?
Posted by: leafsong1
» If You Want The Left To Support Your Defunding...
Posted by: ChicagoWay
» RE: If You Want The Left To Support Your De funding...
Posted by: JSquercia
» No crime in just registering the poor...
Posted by: ChicagoWay
» RE: No crime in just registering the poor...
Posted by: buschthebearrefreshing
Comments are closed-
Posted by: flymulla on Oct 31, 2009 7:14 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Firozali A Mulla
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This would be better for you than sleeping pills
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leafsong1 on Oct 31, 2009 8:34 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» damn, I'd already worked them into my latest strip routine
Posted by: hurricane hugo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chetdude on Oct 31, 2009 11:28 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And we're still losing...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Oct 31, 2009 11:52 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's high time the Republican Conspiracy - it's not a "party" - was destroyed and went the way of the Whigs! They've always preferred dealing with dictatorships, and now they want America to be one too.
Ian
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Psssst.... Democrats own the WH, House & Senate...
Posted by: ChicagoWay
» RE: Psssst.... Democrats own the WH, House & Senate...
Posted by: Ian MacLeod
» I'm With You!!
Posted by: ChicagoWay
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Oct 31, 2009 2:00 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Witches' Brouhaha
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Witches' Brouhaha
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Pat Robertson on hate crimes bill: ‘The noose has tightened around the necks of Christians.’
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 31, 2009 4:48 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Right isn't defunding the Left. The faux "left" is defunding the real Left.
Posted by: freshlemon
» RE: The Right isn't defunding the Left. The faux "left" is defunding the real Left.
Posted by: ChicagoWay
» RE: The Right isn't defunding the Left. The faux "left" is defunding the real Left.
Posted by: freshlemon
» RE: The Right isn't defunding the Left. The faux "left" is defunding the real Left.
Posted by: maxpayne
Comments are closed-
Posted by: McGovern72! on Oct 31, 2009 9:22 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Perry Logan on Nov 1, 2009 1:46 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are more Democrats than ever.
The left is better-funded than ever.
Thank you, Heritage Foundation. Thank you, wingers.
Hating ACORN
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Thanks, Perry.
Posted by: GuitarBill
Comments are closed-
Posted by: darkmark on Nov 1, 2009 5:56 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gaubladt on Nov 1, 2009 4:16 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For the past 40 years, they have fought federal and state funding for public and college education
They fought against stimulus money to pay state employees.
Their opposition to environmental cleanup fits nicely into this category.
They have made attempts to defund Planned Parenthood.
Acorn...
Trial lawyers...
During the bush admin they gutted "organic label" rules to drive out mom and pop organic apple growers (ironically, most of them were Republicans)
Relaxation of the classification of recycled paper was another way to screw the left.
During the bush administration, they went after any company who dared to donate to democrats, and forced large companies to hire prominent "Conservatives"(Republicans) to their boards of directors.
The Republican anti-bureaucracy impetus to "kill the beast" was aimed at liberals.
De-funding our nations transportation infra-structure was an attempt to destroy the unionized construction industry.
This is nothing new; but, nobody wants to call them to the carpet for it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: allyourbasearebelongtous on Nov 1, 2009 7:01 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
2. Any corporate money approved for donations to either political party or any PAC's associated with either party or their elected or unelected representatives would have to be approved by a secret ballot of all employees. Corporate donations would then be disbursed by percentages equivalent to the percentages of outcomes of the secret ballot -- for example 50% to X, 35% to Y, and 15% to Z as opposed to 100% to Y because the corporate upper echelon says so. Corporations maintain the fiction that it is their money to do with what they will. However, it is your money as a consumer and an employee that those corporations are using to lobby the government, have their agendas enacted, and generally do what they want -- often at your expense.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: IRIQUOIS227 on Nov 5, 2009 8:32 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dewre on Nov 19, 2009 4:35 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dewre on Nov 19, 2009 4:36 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Purple Girl on Oct 31, 2009 4:40 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Had the scenario portrayed by these two obvious middle class suburbanites been the reality, what true Chrisitian would deny her 'a room'?
Doesn't this also harken back, in ways, to the Birth of Christ- a woman in need of shelter?
I have no problem with ARCORN finding housing for people who are in such dire straits. For a Prostitute it may mean the chance to secure a real job,because she has a permanent address. Prostitution is a dangerous business which only becomes more risky when working the streets as opposed to being a 'call girl'.
Further those who find themselves resorting to prostitution are likely the vicitms of a dysfunctional family and no real concept of community.Pimp Daddy? Permanent housing could work to add societal pressures and influence on her to find another form of work. And what about those 'working girls' with children? The meager tax dollars used are not worth providing a child with shelter, a chance to attend school, do better than his/her parent in the future. What true American would stand in the way of that?
Besides who wants to see these woman walking their Streets? Performing services on your side streets, as your kids ride by???? "get a Room" isn't just for the participants benefit - but the rest of US as well.
Going after ACORN for this Staged charade expose not only it's initiators and supporters lack of real comprehension of Christianity,and social mindedness, but what the foundation of the 'American Way' means.Having the Right to ascend the socio-economic ladder regardless of your parents social status is innately American.
In fact the anti ACORNers can't even claim to be devote 'Capitalists'. She has a product which the market shows to demand. She is the epitome of the 'small business entrepeneur'.
So who are the real 'sinners' in this situation? Who are the ones forcing prostitution into the streets, exposing children to 'the life', rejecting American Values,and deny people access to the 'Free Market'?
At about $1.25 for every american- may be $3.00 a YEAR for the working tax payer over the last 15 yrs for a mere total of 53 million, the self righteous indignation over this 'sting operation' falls flat.For every MILLION these people freaking out about Top Wall Streeters are walking away with in BILLIONS in personal salaries and comp pkgs THIS YEAR ALONE!!!These dumbass MF'ers are giving up societal Socialism, which benefits The People, for Corporate Socialism.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You Should Be ACORN's Defense Council
Posted by: ChicagoWay
» What you saw was an highly edited piece of propaganda from a proven liar.
Posted by: UnEasyOne
» RE: "Anoint my feet and I'll get you an apartment" ???
Posted by: jvaljon1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: angry_prof on Oct 31, 2009 5:14 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: QQOblivion on Oct 31, 2009 5:53 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I tried to report these comments, but the type-these-letters-you-see challenge wouldn't let me, even when I correctly typed the letters!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yeah, why is it so easy to post spam and so hard to repoprt it?
Posted by: leafsong1
» Ever heard of a bug? After all, you're dealing with a computer.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Ever heard of a bug? Yes, and so has Alternet, endlessly.
Posted by: Amy27605
» RE: it's been reported dozens of times
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» You woudn't know spyware from your @$$, reverend.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Try the "Give me a new set of letters" button.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» I did. That didn't work either.
Posted by: QQOblivion
» You must be persistent
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Muslims Disproportionate Victims of Flawed Terrorist Watch List
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» It must be internet day again at St. Elizabeth's Hospital
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: It must be internet day again at St. Elizabeth's Hospital
Posted by: buschthebearrefreshing
» RE: Hey, Alternet!
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» Yup, it's internet day at St. Elizabeth's hospital again.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Hey, Alternet!
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Hey, Alternet!
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» [expletive deleted] YOU, reverend.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: I reported you for personal attacks.
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» I don't hate you reverend. I pity you, because you belong in a mental hospital.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Personal attacks? What's this, "reverend"?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Hey, Alternet!
Posted by: Ian MacLeod
» RE: Hey, Alternet!
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» More BS, "reverend"?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: I live on terra firma and I will defend her to my last breath
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: I live on terra firma and I will defend her to my last breath
Posted by: grokagain
» RE: I live on terra firma and I will defend her to my last breath
Posted by: buschthebearrefreshing
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bigbrother on Oct 31, 2009 6:04 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As soon as they came out for Obama and campaigned for him, they should have been defunded. The fact that some on the left believes it's ok to have a non profit organization receiving public funds campaign for a particular party demonstrates how corrupt our two party system has become.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Then defund KBR, Blackwater, and others!
Posted by: QQOblivion
» RE: Then defund KBR, Blackwater, and others!
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Then defund KBR, Blackwater, and others!
Posted by: bigbrother
» RE: Then defund KBR, Blackwater, and others!
Posted by: buschthebearrefreshing
» RE: Why the uproar
Posted by: Kathy-B
» RE: Why the uproar
Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: Why the uproar
Posted by: fc7711
» RE: Why the uproar
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» Why the hasty exit?
Posted by: leafsong1
» If You Want The Left To Support Your Defunding...
Posted by: ChicagoWay
» RE: If You Want The Left To Support Your De funding...
Posted by: JSquercia
» No crime in just registering the poor...
Posted by: ChicagoWay
» RE: No crime in just registering the poor...
Posted by: buschthebearrefreshing
Comments are closed-
Posted by: flymulla on Oct 31, 2009 7:14 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Firozali A Mulla
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This would be better for you than sleeping pills
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leafsong1 on Oct 31, 2009 8:34 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» damn, I'd already worked them into my latest strip routine
Posted by: hurricane hugo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chetdude on Oct 31, 2009 11:28 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And we're still losing...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Oct 31, 2009 11:52 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's high time the Republican Conspiracy - it's not a "party" - was destroyed and went the way of the Whigs! They've always preferred dealing with dictatorships, and now they want America to be one too.
Ian
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Psssst.... Democrats own the WH, House & Senate...
Posted by: ChicagoWay
» RE: Psssst.... Democrats own the WH, House & Senate...
Posted by: Ian MacLeod
» I'm With You!!
Posted by: ChicagoWay
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Oct 31, 2009 2:00 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Witches' Brouhaha
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Witches' Brouhaha
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Pat Robertson on hate crimes bill: ‘The noose has tightened around the necks of Christians.’
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 31, 2009 4:48 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Right isn't defunding the Left. The faux "left" is defunding the real Left.
Posted by: freshlemon
» RE: The Right isn't defunding the Left. The faux "left" is defunding the real Left.
Posted by: ChicagoWay
» RE: The Right isn't defunding the Left. The faux "left" is defunding the real Left.
Posted by: freshlemon
» RE: The Right isn't defunding the Left. The faux "left" is defunding the real Left.
Posted by: maxpayne
Comments are closed-
Posted by: McGovern72! on Oct 31, 2009 9:22 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Perry Logan on Nov 1, 2009 1:46 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are more Democrats than ever.
The left is better-funded than ever.
Thank you, Heritage Foundation. Thank you, wingers.
Hating ACORN
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Thanks, Perry.
Posted by: GuitarBill
Comments are closed-
Posted by: darkmark on Nov 1, 2009 5:56 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gaubladt on Nov 1, 2009 4:16 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For the past 40 years, they have fought federal and state funding for public and college education
They fought against stimulus money to pay state employees.
Their opposition to environmental cleanup fits nicely into this category.
They have made attempts to defund Planned Parenthood.
Acorn...
Trial lawyers...
During the bush admin they gutted "organic label" rules to drive out mom and pop organic apple growers (ironically, most of them were Republicans)
Relaxation of the classification of recycled paper was another way to screw the left.
During the bush administration, they went after any company who dared to donate to democrats, and forced large companies to hire prominent "Conservatives"(Republicans) to their boards of directors.
The Republican anti-bureaucracy impetus to "kill the beast" was aimed at liberals.
De-funding our nations transportation infra-structure was an attempt to destroy the unionized construction industry.
This is nothing new; but, nobody wants to call them to the carpet for it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: allyourbasearebelongtous on Nov 1, 2009 7:01 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
2. Any corporate money approved for donations to either political party or any PAC's associated with either party or their elected or unelected representatives would have to be approved by a secret ballot of all employees. Corporate donations would then be disbursed by percentages equivalent to the percentages of outcomes of the secret ballot -- for example 50% to X, 35% to Y, and 15% to Z as opposed to 100% to Y because the corporate upper echelon says so. Corporations maintain the fiction that it is their money to do with what they will. However, it is your money as a consumer and an employee that those corporations are using to lobby the government, have their agendas enacted, and generally do what they want -- often at your expense.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: IRIQUOIS227 on Nov 5, 2009 8:32 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dewre on Nov 19, 2009 4:35 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dewre on Nov 19, 2009 4:36 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
When Will Obama Stop Trying to Work with Republicans?
Sarah Palin Aims to Bust Up the Republican Party -- And the Tea Party Movement
White Racial Resentment Bubbles Under the Surface of the Tea Party Movement




