COMMENTS: 99
Meet the Senators in the Creepy Right-Wing Cult Trying to Defeat Health Care Reform
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest News & Politics headlines via email.
(In the 1950s, Family founder Vereide celebrated as a "prophet" a German nationalist who taught, according to Sharlet, that the demand for government services stemmed from "a failure to trust that God would provide.")
Listen to Oklahoma's Coburn, responding to a woman at an August town-hall meeting; she was sobbing because the company that insured her husband cut off his nursing-home care after a brain injury, sending him to her care with a feeding tube in his chest and no coverage for the equipment or training she would need to care for him. Nor would they pay for a speech pathologist or a physical therapist who could teach him how to eat and drink again.
After telling his constituent that his office will help her, as an individual, to navigate the system, Coburn added this: "But the other thing that’s missing in this debate is us as neighbors, helping people that need our help. ... The idea that the government is the solution to our problems is an inaccurate, a very inaccurate, statement."
God will provide. Or your neighbors will. Whatever you get, that's what God wanted for you.
South Carolina's DeMint told a reporter from his hometown newspaper, the Charleston Post and Courier, "I think health care is a privilege. I wouldn't call it a right. ..." On the House side, Family member Zach Wamp of Tennessee told MSNBC's Tameron Hall virtually the same thing in March: "Health care is a privilege." As described on the NBC blog First Read, "Zach Wamp, the always self-assured Tennessee congressman, was on MSNBC this morning, railing against any health care reform effort, calling it a move toward 'socialism' and that Obama was engaging in almost 'class warfare.' "
As Oklahoma's luck would have it, both the state's U.S. senators belong to The Family. While other lawmakers complained they hadn't been given time to read the weighty health care bills on which they were to vote, Inhofe seemed untroubled by that dilemma: his religion would appear to demand that he oppose health care reform as a matter of principle.
As a government disruption of God's free markets, the very concept, by The Family's reckoning, is an abomination. At an August town-hall meeting, Inhofe told residents of Chickasha, Okla., according to the Express-Star of Grady County, that "he does not need to read the 1,000-page health care reform bill, he will simply vote against it." Inhofe explained: "I don't have to read it, or know what's in it. I'm going to oppose it anyways."
Later in the meeting, the senator elaborated. "People are not buying these concepts that are completely foreign to America," Inhofe said. "We're almost reaching a revolution in this country." And when you think about what a revolution means to members of The Family -- Savimbi, Pinochet -- that's enough to give one pause.
Appearing on C-SPAN's Washington Journal last month, Inhofe was asked by a caller to explain what bearing, if any, his religion had on his politics. "I'm a follower of Jesus," he said, "and I’m not embarrassed about it."
UPDATE: As noted above, after this story posted, John Hart, director of communications for Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., returned my call. As one might expect, he takes issue with my characterization of The Family as depicted in this essay. For starters, Hart asserted that "there's a tremendous disparity in economic policy positions" among the senators who take part in Family activities. Hart cited the example of Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., who, after a long silence on health-care reform, voted in favor of the Finance Committee bill. (Nelson is one of a handful of Democrats associated with The Family. The overwhelming character of the group is Republican.)
Hart took issue with my emphasis on The Family's doctrine of "biblical capitalism" as a theological principle that governs the policy aims of some members. "That’s a term I’ve never heard [Sen. Coburn] use," Hart said. "That’s not a serious theological term."
Stay up to date with the latest News & Politics headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: avidAmerican on Oct 20, 2009 2:23 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I found out a secret that is motivating them to deny us health care
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Don't count on any help for Americans from these Senators, they are in it for
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Don't count on any help for Americans from these Senators, they are in it for
Posted by: Spiritgirl
» Forget the Republican / Democrat hype.
Posted by: jvaljon1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: C. Rich on Oct 20, 2009 3:30 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://americaspeaksink.com/2009/10/baby-boomers-the-virus/
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Thge truth
Posted by: MMarauder
» RE: The truth we have to worry about is even bigger than that
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» No fair: spamming off-topic across multiple articles
Posted by: eddie torres
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weightman on Oct 20, 2009 3:44 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And the C Street congregation is not limited to politicians. Their influence is deeply entrenched into the corporate and financial sectors. Party politics are mere distractions. Their interests are Power and Money and turning out whores to spread their particular variation of social disease wherever Power and Money can be found.
Besides, the Democrats don't need the Republicans to pass healthcare "reform." The Democrats have never needed the Republicans for anything more than theatrics, distractions to divert attention away from the fact Democrats have sold the country out to special interests.
Pimps and whores all. Dressed up like Christians, riding off into the C Street sunset in the same Cadillac with a trunk full of our money. Sticking the "public" with the only "options" they are capable of giving up: Crabs, the Clap, or Aids.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Pimps and Whores
Posted by: davmills
» RE: Pimps and Whores
Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: Pimps and Whores
Posted by: orwellturns
Comments are closed-
Posted by: femtobeam on Oct 20, 2009 3:49 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As they claim to be on the moral high ground, telling people that God will provide for their health care, and their circumstances are what God wanted them to have, they take no responsibility for what they are doing as lawmakers, taking bribes from the large companies causing hellish suffering with denials of claims and bankruptcies as well as no care at all. Every bit of it is due to runaway profits in the health care industry.
Reading his words, it is not what Jesus would have thought or spoken. Doubtful, that these men would have been accepted to follow Jesus. More likely, they would have had their tables overturned in anger by him, as money changers and called what they are...hypocrites.
As for their drug dealing, mind controlling, Rev. Moon agenda for abstinence and embedded devices, they are probably signed in to the secret virtual environments provided by their RW network provider, all of it paid for by the NIH under Rev. Moon, who has the subcontract for the abstinence programs. Moon, who claims to be a religious man, was a 3 time jailed rapist and financial criminal. Their abstinence program gives them access to the minds of women and girls through embedded devices, and as Israel Zerhouni said during the hearings, "We want to find out what makes women untoward".
This is the future of their health care program...mind control practice on people in anonymity, with no oversight.
Where are the "Ghost Busters" when you need them? The FBI is going to need a larger budget and some new equipment to deal with the fallout of this "Family". Perhaps they are guaranteed a cubicle in the nearest D.U.M.B. If not, they will probably go the same way as the other scam artist who founded them, Tom DeLay and spend some time in those cubicles. In the meantime, they parrot the Moon Washington Times and destroy civilized, democratic, compassionate, countrymen and women.
These are the same people who decimated the CIA, the Scientists, the Air Force and Education with their fake, religious, underground movement to subvert real Christians and the military in the US in favor of their profits, establishing control for the New World Order in a torturous way which leaves everybody behind.
The agenda is to put poor people in a servant position under giant NGO's and private prisons. History will look upon these men as traitors, not statesmen. Take away their jobs and health care in the next election and tell them to go ask their neighbors for help.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: False Prophets
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leland61 on Oct 20, 2009 4:12 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look at the Christian Churches during the rise of Hitler. They kissed his ass and loved him for the monster he was. Had the Christian Church and its leaders firmly opposed the doctrines of fascism, WW II would never have erupted because Hitler never would have gained power.
The Family really reflects some of the most profoundly anti-human aspects of western monotheisms - Judaism - Christianity and Islam. A trinity of candidates for destruction in the name of the human family and the Earth itself. The sooner they are destroyed the better off the Earth and her children will be.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: war is the problem, global destruction is the crisis
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: grow up and face reality dude, uranium poisoning is their holy grail
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: eligion is the problem
Posted by: teddy
» RE: everything is sacred, every rock, every blade of grass, every worm or bird or plant - agreed
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: everything is sacred, every rock, every blade of grass, every worm or bird or plant - agreed
Posted by: teddy
» RE: everything is sacred, every rock, every blade of grass, every worm or bird or plant - agreed
Posted by: pelican beak
» RE: everything is sacred, every rock, every blade of grass, every worm or bird or plant - agreed
Posted by: teddy
» RE: everything is sacred, every rock, every blade of grass, every worm or bird or plant - agreed
Posted by: pelican beak
» RE: everything is sacred, every rock, every blade of grass, every worm or bird or plant - agreed
Posted by: teddy
» RE: everything is sacred, every rock, every blade of grass, every worm or bird or plant - agreed
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: everything is sacred, every rock, every blade of grass, every worm or bird or plant - agreed
Posted by: teddy
» Comment Incorrectly Describes Christian Church History
Posted by: RustyOldCar
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jackpagan on Oct 20, 2009 5:25 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
www.jackpagan.blogspot.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CLARENCE SWINNEY on Oct 20, 2009 5:48 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He would abhor the following FACTUAL representation of ENRICH THE RICH SHAFT THE POOR
WEALTH + INCOME
“God Bless The Rich”
Please raise your glass of champagne to honor Reagan and Bush II
WEALTH
From 1980 to 2007
Top 1% got 35.4% of Total Wealth Increase
Bottom 60% got 11.2%
Nonhome Wealth
Top 1% got 42.5%of total increase
Bottom 60% got 5.6%
Reagan Tax Cuts—60% for richest—
1980—top 1% got 20.5% of Wealth
1989---top 1% got 35.7% or Wealth for a 78.5% Increase
Clinton tax on richest and tax cuts for lowest income helped get a small change in direction
1992—top 1% got 37.2% of Wealth
2001---top 1% got 33.4% of Wealth
INCOME
From 1980 to 2007
Top 1% got 44.1% of Total Income Increase
Bottom 60% got 12.4%
2001-2008—1% got 491 B in Tax Breaks—annual income exceeded 1.5 million
and put 1% Income at highest percent of Total Income since 1928
Bottom 99% got $3.74 in debt for each $1 in tax cuts 2001-2006
In that time, equal protection and housing for the elderly was slashed 20% adjusted for inflation. Community Development Block Grant cut 32% and lack of health insurance was epidemic.
400 taxpayers with highest income doubled income 2002-2006. Hear Wall Street roar as it crashed in 2007. Party time was over.
The richest 400 reported an average $214 million each in 2005 on federal income tax returns in 2005—up from $104 million in 2002. Doubled.
The 400 richest taxpayers paid only 18% of their income in federal individual income taxes in 2005—down from 30% in 1995—a 66% Tax Cut. Thanks Ron. Thanks George.
Many of the provisions of the 2001 and 2003 Tax Cuts are scheduled to expire at the end of 2010.
IF OBAMA AND DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS MAKE PERMANENT --THEY ARE GONE GONE GONE-FIRED
If made permanent, the top 1% of Households would receive nearly $1200 Billion in Tax Cuts from 2009 through 2018 per cbpp.org
Obama campaigned on eliminating them. Please note this promise.
The poorest 20% would get a magnanimous tax cut of $45 per year. Whoopee!
NET WORTH
2007-top 20% had 85%--bottom 80% had 15%
2007-nonhome worth—20% had 93% and 80% had 7%
2007-Income-20% got 60% and 80% got 40%
Oh! Such a Fair and Balanced Nation! So Christ-Like. Makes me so proud.
cswinney2@triad.rr.com
political historian since 1991 on Reagan-Clinton-Bush II administrations
Above from Holly Sklar co-author of “Raise The Floor: Wages and Policies That Work For All Of Us” hsklar@aol.com --Part from writings of Edward.Wolff@nyu.edu who is considered top authority on Wealth in America
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drricklippin on Oct 20, 2009 6:04 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Any nation which professes to call itself moral and civil must provide at least BASIC health care to ALL its citizens
Those who are blocking that fundamental moral obligation need to be exposed as you have and remembered by name.
THANKS!
Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Roger64 on Oct 20, 2009 6:31 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are presently in a situation in which people who boast most loudly about loving the Lord are doing the poorest job of loving their neighbors. I think it pretty much defines phony.
My personal belief, based on the sheep and goats test from the Gospel of Mark, is that a person cannot be a Republican--or be opposed to serious health care reform--and a Christian.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I walked to the closest church
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: I walked to the closest church
Posted by: Dak
» RE: I walked to the closest church
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: liam99 on Oct 20, 2009 6:35 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: "the family" seems to be the perfect example of the Anti-Christ
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: liam
Posted by: Dak
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lilly on Oct 20, 2009 6:48 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our Puritan forefathers believed in the worldly success of the Elect, but, some things are ridiculous.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Similarity?
Posted by: av3032
Comments are closed-
Posted by: littlepitcher on Oct 20, 2009 6:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Family follows Jesus in exactly the same way. They don't walk the walk or bear the burdens, they just flew in like bats out of Hell, and picked around in the horse manure until they found a few corrupt seeds of theology they could use.
Faith in Jesus--plus the nothing that poor folks already have. Predestination to oppression, and oppressors who are "blessed by God" to pick our pockets, and then forgiven seventy times seven for the theft.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lilly on Oct 20, 2009 6:58 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Maddow
Posted by: eddie torres
» RE: Maddow
Posted by: orwellturns
Comments are closed-
Posted by: vasumurti on Oct 20, 2009 7:21 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An anti-federalist in North Carolina wrote: “The exclusion of religious tests is by many thought dangerous and impolitic. Pagans, Deists and Mohammedans might obtain office among us.” Amos Singletary of Massachussetts, one of the most outspoken critics of the Constitution, said that he “hoped to see Christians (in power), yet by the Constitution, a papist or an infidel was as eligible as they.”
Luther Martin, a Maryland delegate to the Constitutional Convention of 1787 wrote that “there were some members so unfashionable as to think that a belief in the existence of a Deity, and of a state of future rewards and punishments would be some security for the good conduct of our rulers, and that in a Christian country, it would be at least decent to hold out some distinction between the professors of Christianity and downright infidelity or paganism.” Martin’s report shows that a “Christian nation” faction had its say during the convention, and that its views were consciously rejected.
The United States Constitution is a completely secular political document. It begins “We the people,” and contains no mention of “God,” “Jesus,” or “Christianity.” Its only references to religion are exclusionary, such as the “no religious test” clause (Article VI), and “Congress shall make no laws respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” (First Amendment)
The presidential oath of office, the only oath detailed in the Constitution, does not contain the phrase “so help me God” or any requirement to swear on a Bible (Article II, Section 1). The words “under God” did not appear in the Pledge of Allegiance until 1954, when Congress, under McCarthyism, inserted them.
Similarly, “In God we Trust” was absent from paper currency before 1956, though it did appear on some coins beginning in 1864. The original U.S. motto, written by John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Jefferson, is E Pluribus Unum (“Of Many, One”) celebrating plurality and diversity.
In 1797, America made a treaty with Tripoli, declaring that “the government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.” This reassurance to Islam was written under Washington’s presidency and approved by the Senate under John Adams.
We are not governed by the Declaration of Independence. Its purpose was to “dissolve the political bonds,” not to set up a religious nation. Its authority was based upon the idea that “governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,” which is contrary to the biblical concept of rule by divine authority. The Declaration deals with laws, taxation, representation, war, immigration, etc., and doesn’t discuss religion at all. The references to “Nature’s God,” “Creator,” and “Divine Providence” in the Declaration do not endorse Christianity. Its author, Thomas Jefferson, was a Deist, opposed to Christianity and the supernatural.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: vasumurti on Oct 20, 2009 7:22 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jefferson helped create the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom in 1786, incurring the wrath of Christians by his fervent defense of toleration of atheists: “The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts as are only injurious to others. But it does no injury for my neighbor to say there are 20 gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.” Jefferson advocated a “wall of separation” between church and state not to protect the church from government intrusion, but to preserve the freedom of the people:
“I consider the doctrines of Jesus as delivered by himself to contain the outlines of the sublimest morality that has ever been taught;” he observed, “but I hold in the most profound detestation and execration the corruptions of it which have been invested by priestcraft and established by kingcraft, constituting a conspiracy of church and state against the civil and religious liberties of mankind.”
Jefferson and the founding fathers were products of the Age of Enlightenment. Their world view was based upon Deism, secularism, and rationalism.
“The priests of the different religious sects dread the advance of science as witches do the approach of daylight,” wrote Jefferson. “The day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus, by the Supreme Being as his Father, in the womb of a virgin, will be classed with the fable of the generation of Minerva in the brain of Jupiter...we may hope that the dawn of reason and freedom of thought in these United States will do away all this...”
As late as 1820, Jefferson was convinced everyone in the United States would die a Unitarian. Jefferson, Madison and Paine’s writings indicate that America was never intended to be a Christian theocracy. “I have sworn upon the altar of God,” wrote Jefferson, “eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.”
In his 1802 letter to the Danbury Baptists, Jefferson wrote: “Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should ‘make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’ thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.”
Similarly, in an 1824 letter to John Cartwright, Jefferson expressed anger at judges who had based rulings on their belief that Christianity is part of the common law. Cartwright had written a book critical of these judges, and Jefferson was glad to see it. Observed Jefferson, “The proof of the contrary, which you have produced, is controvertible; to wit, that the common law existed while the Anglo-Saxons were yet pagans, at a time when they had never yet heard the name of Christ pronounced, or knew that such a character had ever existed.” Jefferson challenged “the best-read lawyer to produce another script of authority for this judicial forgery” and concluded, “What a conspiracy this, between Church and State!”
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: vasumurti on Oct 20, 2009 7:23 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As president, James Madison also put his separationist philosophy into action. He vetoed two bills he believed would violate church-state separation. The first was an act incorporating the Episcopal Church in the District of Columbia that gave the church the authority to care for the poor. The second was a proposed land grant to a Baptist church in Mississippi. Had Madison, the father of the Constitution, believed that all the First Amendment was intended to do was bar setting up a state church, he would have approved these bills. Instead, he vetoed both, and in his veto messages to Congress explicitly stated that he was rejecting the bills because they violated the First Amendment.
Later in his life, James Madison came out against state-paid chaplains, writing, “The establishment of the chaplainship to Congress is a palpable violation of equal rights, as well as of Constitutional principles.” He also concluded that his calling for days of prayer and fasting during his presidency had been unconstitutional.
In an 1819 letter to Robert Walsh, Madison wrote, “the number, the industry and the morality of the priesthood, and the devotion of the people have been manifestly increased by the total separation of the church from the state.” In an undated essay called the “Detached Memoranda,” written in the early 1800s, Madison wrote, “Strongly guarded...is the separation between Religion and Government in the Constitution of the United States.”
I
In 1833 Madison responded to a letter sent to him by Jasper Adams. Adams had written a pamphlet titled “The Relations of Christianity to Civil Government in the United States,” which tried to prove that the United States was founded as a Christian nation. Madison wrote back: “In the papal system, government and religion are in a manner consolidated, and that is found to be the worst of government.”
Madison, like Jefferson, was confident that separation of church and state would protect both the institutions of government and religion. Late in his life, Madison wrote to a Lutheran minister about this, declaring, “A due distinction...between what is due to Caesar and what is due to God, best promotes the discharge of both obligations...A mutual independence is found most friendly to practical religion, to social harmony, and to political prosperity.”
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Excellent Post!!!
Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: You say, "I believe." ? Get out of secular politics! (part 3)
Posted by: pastortom52
» And yet....
Posted by: morticia
» RE: And yet....
Posted by: vasumurti
» RE: And yet....
Posted by: morticia
» RE: And yet....
Posted by: vasumurti
» RE: And yet....
Posted by: morticia
» In Defense of ALL Life
Posted by: vasumurti
» Here's your opportunity....
Posted by: morticia
» ...is just so much
Posted by: morticia
» we've discussed this before...
Posted by: vasumurti
» ...and you know my views
Posted by: vasumurti
» Uh-huh...we've "discusssed" this before.
Posted by: morticia
» ...but I didn't know your views the way I do now.
Posted by: morticia
» Oh, and....
Posted by: morticia
» And as for the condescending copout...
Posted by: morticia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fbear0143 on Oct 20, 2009 7:42 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The most frightening part . . .
Posted by: VZEQICVA
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wbblack on Oct 20, 2009 7:43 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A final comment, since when did Lenin become a great villain in history. I thought liberals held up Stalin and Mao for that honor. Czar Nicholas II and the other Czars were the villains, and I am glad the Lenin, Stalin and the Russian working class got rid of them. What happened in the USSR over a period of time is another matter that is way to complicated to go into in a post. But the big reason that Saint FDR was forced to implement the New Deal was because he and other smart members of the ruling class knew that if they didn't they could be looking at a revolution of US workers like in Russia. Stalin and the workers of the USSR deserve as much and maybe more thanks than FDR for the New Deal. If there was a vibrant communist or another kind of truly revolutionary movement capturing the hearts and imaginations of common folks around the world today, our "leaders may have had a remarkably different response to the so called economic crisis, which is really capitalism working like it's supposed to.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Good synopsis weak analysis
Posted by: zigy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 20, 2009 7:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Their reasoning IS childlike...
Posted by: zigy
» That's right, you got it, the IRS...
Posted by: njguy73
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Archie1954 on Oct 20, 2009 8:40 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sallyport on Oct 20, 2009 8:55 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: US Citizen on Oct 20, 2009 9:21 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Family - A Sick Perversion of Religion
Posted by: VZEQICVA
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rosarugosa on Oct 20, 2009 9:28 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: "Losing My Religion" by William Lobdell
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: "Losing My Religion" by William Lobdell
Posted by: VZEQICVA
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rbrooks on Oct 20, 2009 10:14 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On the other hand....
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080331/ehrenreich
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: popeurbanxxiii on Oct 20, 2009 10:11 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Had he known them, would Dante Alighieri have had to invent a deeper circle of Hell for these creeps?
For far too long has religion been used in the furthering of evil.
"If'n all y'all's been waitin' on that there AntiChrist, well I reckon we done met 'em." - Pope Bubba I
Wake up sheeple! The wolves are among us!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jtweezo on Oct 20, 2009 10:18 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
RT
Ultimate Anonymity
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» This appears to be SPAM - I would think twice before clicking on that link (I would not) n/m
Posted by: Paul_C
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pastortom52 on Oct 20, 2009 10:26 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This isn't new.
Posted by: wbblack
» RE: This isn't new.
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: This isn't new.
Posted by: pastortom52
» Didn't General Smedley Butler blow the whistle on this...
Posted by: zigy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zigy on Oct 20, 2009 12:24 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: barkway on Oct 20, 2009 1:31 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: njguy73 on Oct 20, 2009 3:42 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: melpol on Oct 20, 2009 4:35 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dogwhisperer on Oct 20, 2009 4:58 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: You found the central GLARING contradiction
Posted by: ADNK
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jimmyaj on Oct 20, 2009 9:34 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The American public won't take this crap much longer, and it could be a metter of days. When the real revolution comes and those turds are herded out of the Capital up to an executioner's hill outside the main building, these clowns will be the first to feel their necks on the chopping block.
They had best wise-up and fix things quick, like RIGHT NOW, or, "be the first one on the block". Time is running out and the fecal matter may hit the proverbial fan any day now.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: theblackgeorgecarlin on Oct 21, 2009 4:21 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: djnoll on Oct 21, 2009 8:32 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am in Las Vegas tonight, and will be in Flagstaff tomorrow, all things being equal. I will an uploading videos from Boise, Las Vegas, and Salt Lake City as I type this, and they should be available by tomorrow morning. I have discussed the Wars, LGBT Marriage and DOMA, and joblessness/homelessness/new homesteading so far. I hope that they will offer you food for thought and some suggestions for our leaders.
I will post the links on Facebook, Twitter, and my homepage in the morning, so look for them there under Devon Noll, DJNoll, and at Let Freedom Ring.Community
America, and posters here at Alternet, groups like the Family flourish in a society where there is no actively engaged, educated citizenry to stop them. As I move forward on this trip, I hope that you will decide to show these people what it is you are doing to expose them and the falsehoods that they embrace. Good Night, America!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: osd on Oct 21, 2009 10:49 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Flick on Oct 24, 2009 2:21 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Thousands of bankruptcies due to health crisis
Posted by: Cytocop
Comments are closed-
Posted by: avidAmerican on Oct 20, 2009 2:23 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I found out a secret that is motivating them to deny us health care
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Don't count on any help for Americans from these Senators, they are in it for
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Don't count on any help for Americans from these Senators, they are in it for
Posted by: Spiritgirl
» Forget the Republican / Democrat hype.
Posted by: jvaljon1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: C. Rich on Oct 20, 2009 3:30 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://americaspeaksink.com/2009/10/baby-boomers-the-virus/
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Thge truth
Posted by: MMarauder
» RE: The truth we have to worry about is even bigger than that
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» No fair: spamming off-topic across multiple articles
Posted by: eddie torres
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weightman on Oct 20, 2009 3:44 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And the C Street congregation is not limited to politicians. Their influence is deeply entrenched into the corporate and financial sectors. Party politics are mere distractions. Their interests are Power and Money and turning out whores to spread their particular variation of social disease wherever Power and Money can be found.
Besides, the Democrats don't need the Republicans to pass healthcare "reform." The Democrats have never needed the Republicans for anything more than theatrics, distractions to divert attention away from the fact Democrats have sold the country out to special interests.
Pimps and whores all. Dressed up like Christians, riding off into the C Street sunset in the same Cadillac with a trunk full of our money. Sticking the "public" with the only "options" they are capable of giving up: Crabs, the Clap, or Aids.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Pimps and Whores
Posted by: davmills
» RE: Pimps and Whores
Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: Pimps and Whores
Posted by: orwellturns
Comments are closed-
Posted by: femtobeam on Oct 20, 2009 3:49 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As they claim to be on the moral high ground, telling people that God will provide for their health care, and their circumstances are what God wanted them to have, they take no responsibility for what they are doing as lawmakers, taking bribes from the large companies causing hellish suffering with denials of claims and bankruptcies as well as no care at all. Every bit of it is due to runaway profits in the health care industry.
Reading his words, it is not what Jesus would have thought or spoken. Doubtful, that these men would have been accepted to follow Jesus. More likely, they would have had their tables overturned in anger by him, as money changers and called what they are...hypocrites.
As for their drug dealing, mind controlling, Rev. Moon agenda for abstinence and embedded devices, they are probably signed in to the secret virtual environments provided by their RW network provider, all of it paid for by the NIH under Rev. Moon, who has the subcontract for the abstinence programs. Moon, who claims to be a religious man, was a 3 time jailed rapist and financial criminal. Their abstinence program gives them access to the minds of women and girls through embedded devices, and as Israel Zerhouni said during the hearings, "We want to find out what makes women untoward".
This is the future of their health care program...mind control practice on people in anonymity, with no oversight.
Where are the "Ghost Busters" when you need them? The FBI is going to need a larger budget and some new equipment to deal with the fallout of this "Family". Perhaps they are guaranteed a cubicle in the nearest D.U.M.B. If not, they will probably go the same way as the other scam artist who founded them, Tom DeLay and spend some time in those cubicles. In the meantime, they parrot the Moon Washington Times and destroy civilized, democratic, compassionate, countrymen and women.
These are the same people who decimated the CIA, the Scientists, the Air Force and Education with their fake, religious, underground movement to subvert real Christians and the military in the US in favor of their profits, establishing control for the New World Order in a torturous way which leaves everybody behind.
The agenda is to put poor people in a servant position under giant NGO's and private prisons. History will look upon these men as traitors, not statesmen. Take away their jobs and health care in the next election and tell them to go ask their neighbors for help.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: False Prophets
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leland61 on Oct 20, 2009 4:12 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look at the Christian Churches during the rise of Hitler. They kissed his ass and loved him for the monster he was. Had the Christian Church and its leaders firmly opposed the doctrines of fascism, WW II would never have erupted because Hitler never would have gained power.
The Family really reflects some of the most profoundly anti-human aspects of western monotheisms - Judaism - Christianity and Islam. A trinity of candidates for destruction in the name of the human family and the Earth itself. The sooner they are destroyed the better off the Earth and her children will be.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: war is the problem, global destruction is the crisis
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: grow up and face reality dude, uranium poisoning is their holy grail
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: eligion is the problem
Posted by: teddy
» RE: everything is sacred, every rock, every blade of grass, every worm or bird or plant - agreed
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: everything is sacred, every rock, every blade of grass, every worm or bird or plant - agreed
Posted by: teddy
» RE: everything is sacred, every rock, every blade of grass, every worm or bird or plant - agreed
Posted by: pelican beak
» RE: everything is sacred, every rock, every blade of grass, every worm or bird or plant - agreed
Posted by: teddy
» RE: everything is sacred, every rock, every blade of grass, every worm or bird or plant - agreed
Posted by: pelican beak
» RE: everything is sacred, every rock, every blade of grass, every worm or bird or plant - agreed
Posted by: teddy
» RE: everything is sacred, every rock, every blade of grass, every worm or bird or plant - agreed
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: everything is sacred, every rock, every blade of grass, every worm or bird or plant - agreed
Posted by: teddy
» Comment Incorrectly Describes Christian Church History
Posted by: RustyOldCar
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jackpagan on Oct 20, 2009 5:25 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
www.jackpagan.blogspot.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CLARENCE SWINNEY on Oct 20, 2009 5:48 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He would abhor the following FACTUAL representation of ENRICH THE RICH SHAFT THE POOR
WEALTH + INCOME
“God Bless The Rich”
Please raise your glass of champagne to honor Reagan and Bush II
WEALTH
From 1980 to 2007
Top 1% got 35.4% of Total Wealth Increase
Bottom 60% got 11.2%
Nonhome Wealth
Top 1% got 42.5%of total increase
Bottom 60% got 5.6%
Reagan Tax Cuts—60% for richest—
1980—top 1% got 20.5% of Wealth
1989---top 1% got 35.7% or Wealth for a 78.5% Increase
Clinton tax on richest and tax cuts for lowest income helped get a small change in direction
1992—top 1% got 37.2% of Wealth
2001---top 1% got 33.4% of Wealth
INCOME
From 1980 to 2007
Top 1% got 44.1% of Total Income Increase
Bottom 60% got 12.4%
2001-2008—1% got 491 B in Tax Breaks—annual income exceeded 1.5 million
and put 1% Income at highest percent of Total Income since 1928
Bottom 99% got $3.74 in debt for each $1 in tax cuts 2001-2006
In that time, equal protection and housing for the elderly was slashed 20% adjusted for inflation. Community Development Block Grant cut 32% and lack of health insurance was epidemic.
400 taxpayers with highest income doubled income 2002-2006. Hear Wall Street roar as it crashed in 2007. Party time was over.
The richest 400 reported an average $214 million each in 2005 on federal income tax returns in 2005—up from $104 million in 2002. Doubled.
The 400 richest taxpayers paid only 18% of their income in federal individual income taxes in 2005—down from 30% in 1995—a 66% Tax Cut. Thanks Ron. Thanks George.
Many of the provisions of the 2001 and 2003 Tax Cuts are scheduled to expire at the end of 2010.
IF OBAMA AND DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS MAKE PERMANENT --THEY ARE GONE GONE GONE-FIRED
If made permanent, the top 1% of Households would receive nearly $1200 Billion in Tax Cuts from 2009 through 2018 per cbpp.org
Obama campaigned on eliminating them. Please note this promise.
The poorest 20% would get a magnanimous tax cut of $45 per year. Whoopee!
NET WORTH
2007-top 20% had 85%--bottom 80% had 15%
2007-nonhome worth—20% had 93% and 80% had 7%
2007-Income-20% got 60% and 80% got 40%
Oh! Such a Fair and Balanced Nation! So Christ-Like. Makes me so proud.
cswinney2@triad.rr.com
political historian since 1991 on Reagan-Clinton-Bush II administrations
Above from Holly Sklar co-author of “Raise The Floor: Wages and Policies That Work For All Of Us” hsklar@aol.com --Part from writings of Edward.Wolff@nyu.edu who is considered top authority on Wealth in America
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drricklippin on Oct 20, 2009 6:04 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Any nation which professes to call itself moral and civil must provide at least BASIC health care to ALL its citizens
Those who are blocking that fundamental moral obligation need to be exposed as you have and remembered by name.
THANKS!
Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Roger64 on Oct 20, 2009 6:31 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are presently in a situation in which people who boast most loudly about loving the Lord are doing the poorest job of loving their neighbors. I think it pretty much defines phony.
My personal belief, based on the sheep and goats test from the Gospel of Mark, is that a person cannot be a Republican--or be opposed to serious health care reform--and a Christian.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I walked to the closest church
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: I walked to the closest church
Posted by: Dak
» RE: I walked to the closest church
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: liam99 on Oct 20, 2009 6:35 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: "the family" seems to be the perfect example of the Anti-Christ
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: liam
Posted by: Dak
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lilly on Oct 20, 2009 6:48 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our Puritan forefathers believed in the worldly success of the Elect, but, some things are ridiculous.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Similarity?
Posted by: av3032
Comments are closed-
Posted by: littlepitcher on Oct 20, 2009 6:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Family follows Jesus in exactly the same way. They don't walk the walk or bear the burdens, they just flew in like bats out of Hell, and picked around in the horse manure until they found a few corrupt seeds of theology they could use.
Faith in Jesus--plus the nothing that poor folks already have. Predestination to oppression, and oppressors who are "blessed by God" to pick our pockets, and then forgiven seventy times seven for the theft.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lilly on Oct 20, 2009 6:58 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Maddow
Posted by: eddie torres
» RE: Maddow
Posted by: orwellturns
Comments are closed-
Posted by: vasumurti on Oct 20, 2009 7:21 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An anti-federalist in North Carolina wrote: “The exclusion of religious tests is by many thought dangerous and impolitic. Pagans, Deists and Mohammedans might obtain office among us.” Amos Singletary of Massachussetts, one of the most outspoken critics of the Constitution, said that he “hoped to see Christians (in power), yet by the Constitution, a papist or an infidel was as eligible as they.”
Luther Martin, a Maryland delegate to the Constitutional Convention of 1787 wrote that “there were some members so unfashionable as to think that a belief in the existence of a Deity, and of a state of future rewards and punishments would be some security for the good conduct of our rulers, and that in a Christian country, it would be at least decent to hold out some distinction between the professors of Christianity and downright infidelity or paganism.” Martin’s report shows that a “Christian nation” faction had its say during the convention, and that its views were consciously rejected.
The United States Constitution is a completely secular political document. It begins “We the people,” and contains no mention of “God,” “Jesus,” or “Christianity.” Its only references to religion are exclusionary, such as the “no religious test” clause (Article VI), and “Congress shall make no laws respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” (First Amendment)
The presidential oath of office, the only oath detailed in the Constitution, does not contain the phrase “so help me God” or any requirement to swear on a Bible (Article II, Section 1). The words “under God” did not appear in the Pledge of Allegiance until 1954, when Congress, under McCarthyism, inserted them.
Similarly, “In God we Trust” was absent from paper currency before 1956, though it did appear on some coins beginning in 1864. The original U.S. motto, written by John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Jefferson, is E Pluribus Unum (“Of Many, One”) celebrating plurality and diversity.
In 1797, America made a treaty with Tripoli, declaring that “the government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.” This reassurance to Islam was written under Washington’s presidency and approved by the Senate under John Adams.
We are not governed by the Declaration of Independence. Its purpose was to “dissolve the political bonds,” not to set up a religious nation. Its authority was based upon the idea that “governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,” which is contrary to the biblical concept of rule by divine authority. The Declaration deals with laws, taxation, representation, war, immigration, etc., and doesn’t discuss religion at all. The references to “Nature’s God,” “Creator,” and “Divine Providence” in the Declaration do not endorse Christianity. Its author, Thomas Jefferson, was a Deist, opposed to Christianity and the supernatural.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: vasumurti on Oct 20, 2009 7:22 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jefferson helped create the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom in 1786, incurring the wrath of Christians by his fervent defense of toleration of atheists: “The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts as are only injurious to others. But it does no injury for my neighbor to say there are 20 gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.” Jefferson advocated a “wall of separation” between church and state not to protect the church from government intrusion, but to preserve the freedom of the people:
“I consider the doctrines of Jesus as delivered by himself to contain the outlines of the sublimest morality that has ever been taught;” he observed, “but I hold in the most profound detestation and execration the corruptions of it which have been invested by priestcraft and established by kingcraft, constituting a conspiracy of church and state against the civil and religious liberties of mankind.”
Jefferson and the founding fathers were products of the Age of Enlightenment. Their world view was based upon Deism, secularism, and rationalism.
“The priests of the different religious sects dread the advance of science as witches do the approach of daylight,” wrote Jefferson. “The day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus, by the Supreme Being as his Father, in the womb of a virgin, will be classed with the fable of the generation of Minerva in the brain of Jupiter...we may hope that the dawn of reason and freedom of thought in these United States will do away all this...”
As late as 1820, Jefferson was convinced everyone in the United States would die a Unitarian. Jefferson, Madison and Paine’s writings indicate that America was never intended to be a Christian theocracy. “I have sworn upon the altar of God,” wrote Jefferson, “eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.”
In his 1802 letter to the Danbury Baptists, Jefferson wrote: “Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should ‘make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’ thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.”
Similarly, in an 1824 letter to John Cartwright, Jefferson expressed anger at judges who had based rulings on their belief that Christianity is part of the common law. Cartwright had written a book critical of these judges, and Jefferson was glad to see it. Observed Jefferson, “The proof of the contrary, which you have produced, is controvertible; to wit, that the common law existed while the Anglo-Saxons were yet pagans, at a time when they had never yet heard the name of Christ pronounced, or knew that such a character had ever existed.” Jefferson challenged “the best-read lawyer to produce another script of authority for this judicial forgery” and concluded, “What a conspiracy this, between Church and State!”
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: vasumurti on Oct 20, 2009 7:23 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As president, James Madison also put his separationist philosophy into action. He vetoed two bills he believed would violate church-state separation. The first was an act incorporating the Episcopal Church in the District of Columbia that gave the church the authority to care for the poor. The second was a proposed land grant to a Baptist church in Mississippi. Had Madison, the father of the Constitution, believed that all the First Amendment was intended to do was bar setting up a state church, he would have approved these bills. Instead, he vetoed both, and in his veto messages to Congress explicitly stated that he was rejecting the bills because they violated the First Amendment.
Later in his life, James Madison came out against state-paid chaplains, writing, “The establishment of the chaplainship to Congress is a palpable violation of equal rights, as well as of Constitutional principles.” He also concluded that his calling for days of prayer and fasting during his presidency had been unconstitutional.
In an 1819 letter to Robert Walsh, Madison wrote, “the number, the industry and the morality of the priesthood, and the devotion of the people have been manifestly increased by the total separation of the church from the state.” In an undated essay called the “Detached Memoranda,” written in the early 1800s, Madison wrote, “Strongly guarded...is the separation between Religion and Government in the Constitution of the United States.”
I
In 1833 Madison responded to a letter sent to him by Jasper Adams. Adams had written a pamphlet titled “The Relations of Christianity to Civil Government in the United States,” which tried to prove that the United States was founded as a Christian nation. Madison wrote back: “In the papal system, government and religion are in a manner consolidated, and that is found to be the worst of government.”
Madison, like Jefferson, was confident that separation of church and state would protect both the institutions of government and religion. Late in his life, Madison wrote to a Lutheran minister about this, declaring, “A due distinction...between what is due to Caesar and what is due to God, best promotes the discharge of both obligations...A mutual independence is found most friendly to practical religion, to social harmony, and to political prosperity.”
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Excellent Post!!!
Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: You say, "I believe." ? Get out of secular politics! (part 3)
Posted by: pastortom52
» And yet....
Posted by: morticia
» RE: And yet....
Posted by: vasumurti
» RE: And yet....
Posted by: morticia
» RE: And yet....
Posted by: vasumurti
» RE: And yet....
Posted by: morticia
» In Defense of ALL Life
Posted by: vasumurti
» Here's your opportunity....
Posted by: morticia
» ...is just so much
Posted by: morticia
» we've discussed this before...
Posted by: vasumurti
» ...and you know my views
Posted by: vasumurti
» Uh-huh...we've "discusssed" this before.
Posted by: morticia
» ...but I didn't know your views the way I do now.
Posted by: morticia
» Oh, and....
Posted by: morticia
» And as for the condescending copout...
Posted by: morticia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fbear0143 on Oct 20, 2009 7:42 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The most frightening part . . .
Posted by: VZEQICVA
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wbblack on Oct 20, 2009 7:43 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A final comment, since when did Lenin become a great villain in history. I thought liberals held up Stalin and Mao for that honor. Czar Nicholas II and the other Czars were the villains, and I am glad the Lenin, Stalin and the Russian working class got rid of them. What happened in the USSR over a period of time is another matter that is way to complicated to go into in a post. But the big reason that Saint FDR was forced to implement the New Deal was because he and other smart members of the ruling class knew that if they didn't they could be looking at a revolution of US workers like in Russia. Stalin and the workers of the USSR deserve as much and maybe more thanks than FDR for the New Deal. If there was a vibrant communist or another kind of truly revolutionary movement capturing the hearts and imaginations of common folks around the world today, our "leaders may have had a remarkably different response to the so called economic crisis, which is really capitalism working like it's supposed to.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Good synopsis weak analysis
Posted by: zigy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 20, 2009 7:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Their reasoning IS childlike...
Posted by: zigy
» That's right, you got it, the IRS...
Posted by: njguy73
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Archie1954 on Oct 20, 2009 8:40 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sallyport on Oct 20, 2009 8:55 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: US Citizen on Oct 20, 2009 9:21 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Family - A Sick Perversion of Religion
Posted by: VZEQICVA
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rosarugosa on Oct 20, 2009 9:28 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: "Losing My Religion" by William Lobdell
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: "Losing My Religion" by William Lobdell
Posted by: VZEQICVA
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rbrooks on Oct 20, 2009 10:14 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On the other hand....
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080331/ehrenreich
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: popeurbanxxiii on Oct 20, 2009 10:11 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Had he known them, would Dante Alighieri have had to invent a deeper circle of Hell for these creeps?
For far too long has religion been used in the furthering of evil.
"If'n all y'all's been waitin' on that there AntiChrist, well I reckon we done met 'em." - Pope Bubba I
Wake up sheeple! The wolves are among us!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jtweezo on Oct 20, 2009 10:18 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
RT
Ultimate Anonymity
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» This appears to be SPAM - I would think twice before clicking on that link (I would not) n/m
Posted by: Paul_C
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pastortom52 on Oct 20, 2009 10:26 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This isn't new.
Posted by: wbblack
» RE: This isn't new.
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: This isn't new.
Posted by: pastortom52
» Didn't General Smedley Butler blow the whistle on this...
Posted by: zigy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zigy on Oct 20, 2009 12:24 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: barkway on Oct 20, 2009 1:31 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: njguy73 on Oct 20, 2009 3:42 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: melpol on Oct 20, 2009 4:35 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dogwhisperer on Oct 20, 2009 4:58 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: You found the central GLARING contradiction
Posted by: ADNK
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jimmyaj on Oct 20, 2009 9:34 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The American public won't take this crap much longer, and it could be a metter of days. When the real revolution comes and those turds are herded out of the Capital up to an executioner's hill outside the main building, these clowns will be the first to feel their necks on the chopping block.
They had best wise-up and fix things quick, like RIGHT NOW, or, "be the first one on the block". Time is running out and the fecal matter may hit the proverbial fan any day now.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: theblackgeorgecarlin on Oct 21, 2009 4:21 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: djnoll on Oct 21, 2009 8:32 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am in Las Vegas tonight, and will be in Flagstaff tomorrow, all things being equal. I will an uploading videos from Boise, Las Vegas, and Salt Lake City as I type this, and they should be available by tomorrow morning. I have discussed the Wars, LGBT Marriage and DOMA, and joblessness/homelessness/new homesteading so far. I hope that they will offer you food for thought and some suggestions for our leaders.
I will post the links on Facebook, Twitter, and my homepage in the morning, so look for them there under Devon Noll, DJNoll, and at Let Freedom Ring.Community
America, and posters here at Alternet, groups like the Family flourish in a society where there is no actively engaged, educated citizenry to stop them. As I move forward on this trip, I hope that you will decide to show these people what it is you are doing to expose them and the falsehoods that they embrace. Good Night, America!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: osd on Oct 21, 2009 10:49 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Flick on Oct 24, 2009 2:21 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Thousands of bankruptcies due to health crisis
Posted by: Cytocop
When Will Obama Stop Trying to Work with Republicans?
Sarah Palin Aims to Bust Up the Republican Party -- And the Tea Party Movement
White Racial Resentment Bubbles Under the Surface of the Tea Party Movement




