COMMENTS: 5
Republican Gomorrah: Inside the Movement That Shattered the Party
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest News & Politics headlines via email.
The following is the transcript of an interview by Democracy Now's Juan Gonzalez with author Max Blumenthal about his new book, Republican Gomorrah. It has been edited for length.
Juan Gonzalez: Fifty years ago, Republican President Dwight Eisenhower issued a warning against the rise of extremist movements within his own party. During his presidency, Eisenhower had endured attacks by Senator Joseph McCarthy, the radical right John Birch Society and others. In a 1959 letter to a World War II veteran, Eisenhower wrote, quote, “Many prominent officials, possessing no standing or expertness as they themselves claim it, attempt to further their own ideas or interests by resorting to statements more distinguished by stridency than by accuracy.”
Half a century later, in a summer of town hall disruptions and birth certificate controversies, what Eisenhower had warned against has come true: that the Republican Party has been captured by its extremist wing. At least that’s what award-winning journalist Max Blumenthal argues in his new book, Republican Gomorrah: Inside the Movement that Shattered the Party.
The book examines the transformation of the GOP from the party of Dwight Eisenhower to the party of Sarah Palin and how this sets the stage for the future of American politics. Max Blumenthal is a Puffin Foundation writing fellow at the Nation Institute. He joins us today for his first extended interview about his book, Republican Gomorrah. .. [Max,] you had an op-ed piece in the Times this week citing that Eisenhower quote. Can you talk about that warning of Eisenhower and your sense of how true it rings today?
Blumenthal: I actually discovered that Eisenhower letter while doing some research for my book, Republican Gomorrah. You know, for the past six years I’ve covered the radical right. I’ve gone to their conventions. I’ve interviewed their leaders. I’ve gone to their houses of worship. And I’ve gotten a sense of what conservatism has become, how radical it’s become, and the extent to which the Christian right has taken over the Republican Party. So when I found this letter by Eisenhower to a military veteran who was dying at the time -- and he didn’t really have to respond to his letter -- I was really riveted by it, by this prophecy, and I found it even a little bit eerie. I think that his warning about the rise of extremist movements should be as memorable in history as his warning about the military-industrial complex, because he saw what was happening to his Republican Party.
Eisenhower really believed in the big tent philosophy of the Republican Party, that in order to be a national party, you had to have a broad constituency. Today, the Republican Party is a one-ring circus, and it’s controlled by people like Sarah Palin, who are warning of death panels, that Barack Obama’s healthcare plan will decide who lives and who dies. It’s controlled by people like Representative Paul Broun, this born-again Christian who was recently elected, who’s comparing Barack Obama simultaneously to Hitler and Stalin. It’s controlled by -- it actually has no leadership. It’s controlled by the movement that I say shattered the party, which is substantially the Christian right.
And the conservatism that defines it is not an ideology or a set of ideas; it’s really a sensibility. It’s a social psychology that I think is best summarized by a quote by Newt Gingrich, who’s also supported Sarah Palin’s claim about death panels. Newt Gingrich said, “I think you can write a psychological profile of me that says I found a way to immerse my insecurities in a cause large enough to justify whatever I wanted it to.”
And so, in Eisenhower’s letter, he actually recommended a really fascinating book by Eric Hoffer, who was a self-educated dockworker, to this military veteran. And the central thesis of Hoffer’s book, The True Believer, is that faith in a holy cause is really a substitute for lost faith in ourselves. And that’s sort of the thesis of my book and how -- and what I’ve discovered from the true believers of the Republican Party that I’ve been around for the past six years.
Gonzalez: Well, what I found riveting in your book was the -- most people associate the rise of the modern radical right in the Republican Party with Barry Goldwater and the elections of 1964. But you actually trace it much further back to a bunch of people that few Americans have ever heard of: Francis Schaeffer or R.J. Rushdoony, R.H. Ahmanson. Could you talk about these individuals and their enormous impact on the current crop of radical right leaders?
Blumenthal: Yeah, and I don’t want to go too far back in the past; I want to try to keep it present.
Stay up to date with the latest News & Politics headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: progressive-life on Sep 6, 2009 8:52 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Flip side
Posted by: Solar Wind
» Oh Nooooo.......Not.....Not ACORN!!!
Posted by: armorypk
» Wrong
Posted by: drcyflowers
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MotherLodeBeth on Sep 9, 2009 9:08 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Back in the 80's we actually visited Dr R J Rushdoony at his home near us in Angels Camp CA, having read an article in the Oakland Tribune about his Chalcedon Institute and then we started reading his books which were heavy reading, and found out he was a believer in a theocracy government, and believed in a government of old testament laws, yet was anti Semitic. We never saw or talked to him after that.
Am also glad the author wrote extensively about Dr James Dobson, of Focus On The Family because I am a firm believer that one cannot be pro family and anti socialism and big government, yet have so many followers who use the very government programs you denounce. Ever stop and think about how many people who get Social Security and use Medicare contribute to the very people who denounce socialist programs?
Or how about Newt Gingrich which the author hits the nail on the head with, when he explains the Machiavellian mindset that the ends justify the means. Like how the three time married Gingrich all of a sudden is a born again Christian who we are supposed to now listen to. Simply because he went on religious shows and acknowledged his sexual sins.
In fact I also suggest you read Pure Goldwater by Barry Goldwater Jr and John Dean which shows that Goldwater wasn't anti choice or homophobic, or ant immigrant or anti non Christian. Nor are the radical right who control the Republican party now, anything similar to Ronald Reagan and certainly not like Teddy Roosevelt or Abraham Lincoln.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Religious Right and Tea Party Nation Turn to Michele Bachmann in Desperate Attempt to Defeat Health-Care Bill
Where Did David Brooks Get the Bizarre Idea That the Tea Party Crowd Resembles '60s Movements?
Massa Ruins Glenn Beck's Day; Admits to Groping "Tickle Fight" with Staffer




