COMMENTS: 142
A Redneck View of Obama's Presidency
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest News & Politics headlines via email.
When it comes to expressing plain truths, few are as gifted as American rednecks. During recent travels in the Appalachian communities of West Virginia, Tennessee and Kentucky I've collected scores of their comments on our national condition and especially President Barack Obama.
In America, all successful politicians are first and foremost successfully marketed brands. In fact, the Obama campaign was named Advertising Age's 2008 marketer of the year. George W. Bush's brand may have "collapsed," as they say on Madison Avenue, but things don't change much. Rednecks instinctively know this:
"It don't matter who gets to warm his butt in the White House chair," says a West Virginia trucker. "The top dogs eat high on the hog and the little dogs eat the tails and ears. That's what them bailouts is all about, and that's the way it is no matter who's president. So you might as well vote for the guy who looks like the most fun because you gonna be watching his ass on television for the next eight years."
To be sure, the Obama brand is a feel good brand. Like those Hallmark talking digital greeting cards we geezers send one another that say "You're still sexy baby!" Or "How's it hanging stud?" we know of course, the only things hanging are our beer bellies and the fat on our upper arms. But it makes us feel good anyway. For about ten seconds."Nothing against Obama, mind you, but the last time I looked, the car plants was dead meat. Obama has never even come close to serving in the military, except for serving up that batch of hash in Baghdad. And there he was with his wife in a soup kitchen for god sake! Things has got so bad that we've got soup kitchens all over this country now. So, two millionaires in their armored limo drop by a soup kitchen, and this is supposed to make me feel good about my country?"
Postscript: Aw hell! The front page of today's newspaper tells me the $250 stimulus payment is only a loan from the government, and that I will have to pay it back next April. In this new America, we are all issued debt, whether we ask for it or not (sigh).
Stay up to date with the latest News & Politics headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kwalla on May 27, 2009 12:36 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The hungriest ones eat them.
Posted by: and_abottleofrum
» RE: BY THE TIME THE BUSH'S HOUSEMAN FINISHES THERE MIGHT NOT BE ANYTHING TO EAT,
Posted by: joeocho88
» Are you here to tell potty jokes?
Posted by: freelyb
Comments are closed-
Posted by: spacemarine83 on May 27, 2009 1:16 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For real change, we need real leadership. Not a photo-op. It does not have to from the left or right per se, but should come from someone who can fix the problems, not rely on empty slogans of "hope and change" or the mantras that Bush put down.
Essentially, we need new people in office. People who represent us, not corporate interests and ideals. People who respect the Bill of Rights and our sacred institutions of government that we have to establish greater liberty.
Not welfare enablers or parasites that do not pay in, not big-business enablers who fleece us all.
We need Americans who will stand up to the call of civic service with integrity, something that we have not seen in decades.
Hopefully we can save the Constitutional Republic which we all (both left and right) love so dearly.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Blunt and to the point.
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» The treasury handed off to the Bushanostra cost more!
Posted by: hardwroc
» RE: Blunt and to the point.
Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: Blunt and to the point.
Posted by: aichbe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: davy on May 27, 2009 1:52 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Xpat observer
Posted by: HoboHomo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kanekoa64 on May 27, 2009 2:02 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Somehow, it still makes no mention of Republican responsibility for the limited choices Obama has to make that Right Wingers don't like.
Still, it's a start.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Good Ol' Down Home Wisdom,
Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: ELITIST SNOB MAKES DEMEANING ARGUMENTUM AD HOMINEM
Posted by: joeocho88
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Perry Logan on May 27, 2009 2:41 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the universal refrain of all alienated white guys.
But it just ain't so.
Statistics show very clearly that the poverty rate goes down under Democrats and up under Republicans:
The New Deal lowered the poverty rate from over 50% to around 20%.
Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty reduced the poverty level in the United States to its lowest level ever 11.1 percent in 1973.
Under Bill Clinton, the poverty rate fell from 15.1 percent in 1993 to 12.7 percent in 1998. That was the lowest poverty rate since 1979 and the largest five-year drop in poverty in nearly 30 years (1965-1970).
The African-American poverty rate dropped from 33.1 percent in 1993 to 26.1 percent in 1998 -- the lowest level ever recorded and the largest five-year drop in African-American poverty in more than a quarter century (1967-1972).
The poverty rate for Hispanics fell to the lowest level since 1979, and dropped to 25.6 percent in 1998.
African-American unemployment fell from 14.2 percent in 1992 to 7.3 percent in March 2000 -- the lowest rate on record.
The unemployment rate for Hispanics fell from 11.6 percent in 1992 to 6.3 percent in March 2000 -- and in the last year has been at the lowest rate on record.
For women the unemployment rate was 4.3 percent in March 2000, nearly the lowest since 1953 [when few women sought employment outside the home].
Under President Clinton and Vice President Gore, child poverty declined from 22.7 percent in 1993 to 18.9 percent in 1998 -- the biggest five-year drop in nearly 30 years.
The poverty rate for African-American children fell from 46.1 percent in 1993 to 36.7 percent in 1998 -- the lowest level in 20 years and the biggest five-year drop on record.
The rate also fell for Hispanic children, from 36.8 percent to 34.4 percent - and is now 6.5 percentage points lower than it was in 1993.
Needless to say, the povery rate skyrocketed under Bush II, as it always does under Republicans.
In other words, the difference between the parties is the difference between night and day.
Since this information would make the Democrats look good, the media doesn't report it. That's why truck drivers--along with most Americans--don't know squat about the difference between Democrats and Republicans.
Da Banksta explains everything.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why Americans don't know squat.
Posted by: mcstewey
» RE: IF YOU DON'T LIKE AMERICA, YOU MIGHT BE HAPPIER SOMEWHERE ELSE
Posted by: joeocho88
» RE: IF YOU DON'T LIKE AMERICA, YOU MIGHT BE HAPPIER SOMEWHERE ELSE
Posted by: masthead
» RE: IF YOU DON'T LIKE AMERICA, YOU MIGHT BE HAPPIER SOMEWHERE ELSE
Posted by: adempatriot
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kepstein7777 on May 27, 2009 2:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's the same dumb-ass logic that keeps getting us deeper in this mess: Liberals and/or Democrats are overeducated dreamers and phonies who think too much, so we should all vote Republican. That may not be the direct message of the article, but it's the implication that seems to keep putting idiots and fanatics like Reagan and GWB in office.
We assume that men of action are necessarily better than those who talk and make promises they can't keep. But what kind of action are we talking about? Starting wars? Trashing the economy? Spying on people? Torturing people?...If so, I'd prefer folks like Clinton who chase interns all day, or smooth-talking wordsmiths like Obama.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Fixing it you!
Posted by: ABetterFuture
» Rednecks are Americans
Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: ednecks are Americans
Posted by: HoboHomo
» "spying on people"
Posted by: tjg1984
» RE:dnecks...
Posted by: Tweck9
» RE: dnecks...
Posted by: vetus schola
» RE: dnecks...
Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE:VOTE OUT ALL OF THE ELITISTS!
Posted by: joeocho88
» RE: edneck
Posted by: Bibsisis
» Good point
Posted by: freelyb
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Moonray on May 27, 2009 3:30 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By the way, the word "redneck" has a reverse-racist ring to it. Not to mention that it's condescending. Better to use the term "moron," which can be applied universally, as in "Morons who agree with good-old-boy wisdom often end up voting for Republicans."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Spare us the good old boy crap
Posted by: maryyooch
» RE: Spare us the good old boy crap
Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: "end up voting for Republicans."
Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: NO DEMOCRAT,NO REPUBLICAN, ALL ELITISTS
Posted by: joeocho88
» RE: Spare us the good old boy crap
Posted by: Bibsisis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PJAW on May 27, 2009 4:13 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I eventually went to school and became a doctor, and now that I've been dealing with insurance companies all my professional life, I'm thinkin' I may have been better off "paintin' houses". At least I got paid for what I did.
As for Obama, I'll be happier when I see more wind mills and feel less hot air.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yup, nothing has changed, or is going to
Posted by: kad
» RE: I remember 'Ol Merle
Posted by: ellie
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Fishbone Soldier on May 27, 2009 4:55 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE:OUR SOUP KITCHENS HERE ARE SO CROWDED THEY RUN OUT OF FOOD
Posted by: joeocho88
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Aimleft on May 27, 2009 5:57 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And by the way, I'm a South Carolina girl, born and bred - who is sick and tired of the willful ignorance that surrounds me.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kanekoa64 on May 27, 2009 6:44 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dun messed up yer hed bone, ah reckon'!
Git away from all them, so-phisteecated, enlightened folks, tryin' to make the world a happy little commune fer tree huggin' and raising spotted owls.
And them thar "love ins" with all them "queers".
It's enough ta make a grown feller downright illafied!
Don't they understayand it's awr planet and theys got to confirm to awr way of lawf, dammit?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kanekoa64 on May 27, 2009 6:44 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dun messed up yer hed bone, ah reckon'!
Git away from all them, so-phisteecated, enlightened folks, tryin' to make the world a happy little commune fer tree huggin' and raising spotted owls.
And them thar "love ins" with all them "queers".
It's enough ta make a grown feller downright illafied!
Don't they understayand it's awr planet and theys got to confirm to awr way of lawf, dammit?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jareilly on May 27, 2009 10:20 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem with a lot of rednecks is that they take special and perverse pride in living DOWN to the stereotype. And one part of the stereotype is the sense of permanent victimhood, of grievance, of hurt pride that rednecks never, EVER seem able to let go. It's the whole theme of your post. Time to get over Appomattox.
Your problem isn't up North. It's right there in the mirror!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: LOOKIT ALL THEM BIGGOTS:
Posted by: jareilly
Comments are closed-
Posted by: joeocho88 on May 28, 2009 12:08 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And because of THEM, we have generations of welfare recipients and unwanted, abused and neglected children born solely to increase the welfare checks and get more free housing because there is NO HELP available for women who do NOT want to bring more misery into the world that they cannot feed...
LIBERALS REALLY ARE FULL OF SELF-HATRED.
Maybe they ought to turn all of this great education towards themselves and see why they are such HYPOCRITES!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: freelyb on May 31, 2009 6:30 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maryyooch on May 27, 2009 5:31 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every time that people use the military arguments, they seem to forget that the ones who completely and premeditatedly avoided the military during war time! Do we need to remind these folks that Cheney, Bush, Rumsfeld, et al all got deferments or had their Daddy's money buy them an excuse not to serve? President Obama was not drafted nor was trying to avoid military service. He wasn't being sneaky or underhanded in the least way, ya know, like the war hawks listed here.
I just don't understand how these rednecks don't see this picture. Especially after they praised McCain for his service and totally tried to kill Sen Kerry for his valour.
I guess it takes a redneck or republican, t totally miss the truth.
And......it's good to see that the President and First Lady are not blind to the plight of the working poor and homeless. As for republicans, they always try and tell you how the homeless like being homeless. And rednecks and their ilk always buy this argument. Makes NO sense what-so-ever!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Military Service & Soup Kitchens
Posted by: Aimleft
» RE: Military Service & Soup Kitchens
Posted by: mtnprivy
» RE: Military Service & Soup Kitchens
Posted by: Texican
» Actually, You're the one who forgot
Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: Military Service
Posted by: rickiey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on May 27, 2009 5:51 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Generally speaking, real rednecks are not the least bit fun, "real" or noble. They are rude, violent types who take pride in being ignorant.
They are arrogant and aggressive. They are blunt, which can be mistaken for honesty but it is not remotely the same thing.
People with "class" may be artificial and pretentious, which is the opposite of rednecks who will blurt out anything on their mind just like a little kid.
I am not the least bit fond of most rednecks. Of course I am not too fond of many people with "class" either. I like being a hermit!
Granny's crazy videos Go get a chuckle!
Luv,
granny
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Having lived in Tennessee
Posted by: rickiey
» RE: Having lived in Tennessee
Posted by: sirios
» I just laughed so hard I peed!
Posted by: Grandma Crabby
» RE: I just laughed so hard I peed!
Posted by: adempatriot
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sausage on May 27, 2009 6:17 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read his stupid book, "Deer Hunting with Jesus" and learned nothing about lower-middle class white males that I already didn't know from working along side them, as Joe Bageant did not for the majority of his adult life.
For the life of me, I don't understand how Bageant's become the darling of the left. All he is selling is the same anti-big government soft soap that reactionary Republicans have peddled to these mostly white, mostly male, mostly small business owners--remodelers, drywallers, independent carpenters, concrete finishers, insurance agents and owners of tiny stores and junkyards--who blame everything and everybody for their misery except those with whom they most want to identify: the CEOs and boardroom executives of Fortune 500 companies.
The reality is that the small shop owner, the handyman, the junkyard owner and so on who are
making between 100 and 50k or less a year
have more in common with the union guys, who Rush Limbaugh tells them is ruining the country, than a guy like an Edward Liddy, out-going CEO of AIG. But since the Joe Bageant "Rednecks" of the world believe they are getting fucked by the IRS, more tax cuts will solve everything! And maybe even put the n*ggers and women back in their place!
Bottom line, the "rednecks" about whom Joe Bageant writes so lovingly are some of the same stupid motherf*ckers who showed up for the April 15 "teabag parties." I'll bet you a dollar that the morons Bageant quoted in the above essay jack off to visions of Sarah Palin dancing in their tiny heads before they drop off to sleep.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I WAS A NEWSPAPER PERSON FOR A WHILE & I DIDN'T MAKE ENOUGH JACK TO RETIRE TO BELIZE
Posted by: joeocho88
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on May 27, 2009 6:17 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There wasn't a scintilla of legality in any of it. IRS doesn't bother with niceties like law - even law like simple fairness. All the government's parasites needed my blood, and if they needed all of it - well, I should just be a good soldier and give his life.
But that's all another story no one wants to hear. "Whining," those of liberal leaning always say. Elsewhere here, I replied to someone who wondered what will happen next. Having lived that for all those who will finance the "bailout" and "affirmative action" for the rich - just another self-serving faction in a deteriorating country, I said:
"Save the constitutional republic . . ." Don't count on it (and it's just good tactics to always have a position to which you can fall back). The shark that was the U.S. collected to many remoras. They've bled him to weakness, and he'll soon die.
We've illegal immigrant-ed, affirmitive action-ed, Title Nine-ed, equal opportunity in housing-ed, and left wing politiced our way to economic and spiritual - fatal - feableness.
As one who saw it coming in a speech I made way back in 1972 - I spoke of the New Feudal Age and the break-up of the U.S. - none of it is a surprise. "Democracy never last long," John Adams said famously (well, that's anywhere that history is studied - certainly not the U.S.). "It always wastes, exhausts, and murders itself."
How's that for being prophetic?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» So, after you were "orphaned" you lived like a feral cat?
Posted by: sausage
» RE: So, after you were "orphaned" you lived like a feral cat?
Posted by: bonapartist
» RE: So, after you were "orphaned" you lived like a feral cat?
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: So, after you were "orphaned" you lived like a feral cat?
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» Hillarious
Posted by: bonapartist
» RE: Hillarious
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: HOW COME NOTHING HAPPENS TO THESE ELITIST POLITICIANS & CRONIES WHO DON'T PAY TAXES
Posted by: joeocho88
» RE: HOW COME NOTHING HAPPENS TO THESE ELITIST POLITICIANS & CRONIES WHO DON'T PAY TAXES
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
Comments are closed-
Posted by: greenman on May 27, 2009 6:28 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bageant's steady refusal to examine our national situation in a serious way, or to do anything other than rip off a series of salty observations from his fellow rednecks doesn't spark too much sympathy. Why should anyone listen to this drivel? And why does Alternet waste our time with Bageant when we could get the same thing from Limbaugh?
Greenman
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE:MAYBE THE PIGS LIMBAUGH KEEPS COMPANY WITH ARE CLEANER
Posted by: joeocho88
» RE: Whiners
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: art guerrilla on May 27, 2009 6:50 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. trying to pin down technical definitions of 'redneck' is silly; there simply ARE quite a few crackers -and some blacks!- who self-identify with the 'redneck lifestyle' and are damn proud of it...
that is MOSTLY slanted towards liking fishin' and huntin' and bbq and beer and babes and country music and dogs and trucks and baseball caps and nascar and plaid and sports and goofin' off...
*not* the more racist, ignorant, violent stereotypes some are trying to portray as being the prevalent brand of redneckism...
having lived in the deep south for a few decades now, having redneck roommates who i went out with muddin' and 4-wheelin' and shootin' over-powered (and illegal) firearms of various calibers, and having been altruistically helped on more than one occasion by an anonymous redneck driving by while i was having vehicle troubles; i would trust your generic 'redneck' over ANY harvard grad, ANY day of the week, and twice on sundays...
2. regardless of one kamper making a technical defense/rebuttal, that 'things' were generally 'better' for po' folks under dem'rat pwesidents than repug pwesidents, is both a relative factoid, and besides the point...
we -the 90% of us at the bottom of the food chain- have been, are being, and will continue to be screwed over by a system that is rigged against us, and to serve the interests of the power elites...
that dem'rats generously let us li'l peeps have 2 cups of cheezy doodles a day, rather than the mean old rethugs letting us have 1 cup of cheezy doodles, is hardly worth jumping up and down about...
art guerrilla
aka ann archy
eof
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: idiculous, do you think if you lived in Iowa or Wisconsin or anywhere
Posted by: art guerrilla
Comments are closed-
» RE: RedNecks [The WANKER above is an Identity Theft Spammer
Posted by: Squarehead
Comments are closed-
Posted by: frankly1 on May 27, 2009 7:24 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. We don't have to worry about the environment as god is making us a new planet.
2. We have all the oil we need, we're just saving it for when everyone else has run out.
Surrounded by epsilons?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: edneck=Mental Retardation
Posted by: Lilly
» RE: edneck=Mental Retardation
Posted by: Zeugitai
» RE: edneck=Mental Retardation
Posted by: Borgar
» RE: I PREFER PEOPLE WHO WORK FOR A LIVING TO THOSE WHO STEAL
Posted by: joeocho88
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nikolai on May 27, 2009 7:29 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: American gov't needs to be overhauled
Posted by: HoboHomo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: grindermonkey on May 27, 2009 7:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sandy55 on May 27, 2009 8:11 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One thing keeps sticking in my mind an article I read by an American Redneck that stated if America has all this money for bailouts where was that money and the will to use it when New Orleans needed bailing out? How is that for a redneck racist comment where does it fit in your culture? For me this is blunt and straight shooting while it may be simplistic compared to how complicated the political system has become it seems to have a heart. Perhaps that is what you are missing in defining a red neck they have hearts I could be completely wrong. Thought I would add some outside thought on how it looks from over here.
This part of your country remains devasted lack of help there speaks volumes to the rest us NON Americans? Americans confuse me and I think Americans are confused as there are many things you say you believe but your actions are the oposite of your belief system and often your laws. You don't make any sense to me. So I guess I likely am a redneck.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Lemme go all redneck on your *ss
Posted by: sausage
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ted Voth Jr on May 27, 2009 8:46 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So why do us Rednecks mostly vote against our own best interests?
People with such a Populist appreciation, how do we Leftists talk to em?
You're right, I identify with both groups; I'm a Liberal Okie!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: So Why do us Rednecks Mostly Vote against Our Own Best Interests?
Posted by: kanekoa64
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lilly on May 27, 2009 8:46 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This morning posters have extended their wisdom to Sotomayor, suggesting that as a Hispanic woman she would be more wisely employed cleaning toilets. And, this always-reliable opinion, any minority person has succeeded only because of Affirmative Action preferences.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» And yet we don't dare talk about that, do we?
Posted by: sausage
» RE: ednecks on townhall.com
Posted by: Zeugitai
» RE: I TAKE EXCEPTION TO YOUR STATEMENTS ABOUT MICHELLE AND THE JUDGE CANDIDATE
Posted by: joeocho88
» RE: I TAKE EXCEPTION TO YOUR STATEMENTS ABOUT MICHELLE AND THE JUDGE CANDIDATE
Posted by: joeocho88
» RE: I TAKE EXCEPTION TO YOUR STATEMENTS ABOUT MICHELLE AND THE JUDGE CANDIDATE
Posted by: morticia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bliss Doubt on May 27, 2009 8:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: There was a campaign tee shirt I wanted: NO WAY!
Posted by: kanekoa64
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sirios on May 27, 2009 8:50 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lile on May 27, 2009 9:20 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Bageant's from Virginia...
Posted by: morticia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on May 27, 2009 9:20 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: edneck, schmedneck
Posted by: HoboHomo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MSharp on May 27, 2009 9:34 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
personality Larry The
Cable Guy has made millions
off of the negative myths
attributed to rural and
lower income whites.
Just as black people are
insulted by the n word
and asians taking offense
at being called overachievers
people who classify themselves
as rednecks should be offended
by the likes of Larry The Cable
Guy.
(To add further insult to injury,
a recent tour of LTCG charged
20.00 per ticket. Redneck prices?)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: BLACK FOLKS HAD STEPNFETCHIT
Posted by: joeocho88
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Southern Gal on May 27, 2009 10:40 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Not All Rednecks Are Alike
Posted by: soulrebeljc
» RE: Not All Rednecks Are Alike
Posted by: Southern Gal
» RE: Not All Rednecks Are Alike
Posted by: adempatriot
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tfinn on May 27, 2009 12:42 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Hiroak on May 27, 2009 1:03 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyway the Union miners wore red scarves to identify themselves and hence the term had its birth. It was transmorgrophied into a negative conotation by the mine management, the Army, the Government, and other assorted scum and has stuck to this day.
The original "Rednecks" stood up for the working man and many died for their bravery. Note: many were black, chinese, native american, mulungeon, and of course poor (re: mine worker) white people.
So I would appreciate it if y'all'd just back up off our ass a bit and rethink what a redneck is.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Redneck an honorable term
Posted by: PJAW
» Thanks but it doesn't matter
Posted by: Hiroak
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cori on May 27, 2009 2:12 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: MY U.S.CONGRESSMEN AND MY REPRESENTATIVE CARE BECAUSE WE COMMUNICATE
Posted by: joeocho88
» No reason to be disappointed in Obama
Posted by: Dboy
» How Deluded & Fickle... Where Have You Been For 10+ Years?
Posted by: kanekoa64
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jejer on May 27, 2009 4:16 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HoboHomo on May 27, 2009 5:08 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Stuffing AND Mounting? Damn Lucky Homosexuals at Your House!
Posted by: kanekoa64
» OOPs RE: Stuffing AND Mounting? Damn Lucky Homosexuals at Your House!
Posted by: kanekoa64
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lorenbliss on May 27, 2009 5:07 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rural folks recognize firearms as vital survival tools -- especially in regions where law-enforcement response times can run up to an hour. Firearms are also as much food-harvesting instruments as hoes, tillers and fishing tackle.
Obama carried the blue-collar U.S. in 2008 largely because he managed to suppress the Democratic Party’s fanatical support for forcible disarmament and compulsory pacifism (and thus mandatory victimhood) that characterized the Democrats' 2000 and 2004 campaigns.
Though now -- as Obama methodically betrays nearly every campaign promise stated or implied -- the validity of the Democrats’ reversal on that matter is increasingly in doubt too.
Hence my prediction: that once the Left’s legitimate outrage at Obama’s ongoing betrayals reaches a crescendo of protest, he will unleash H.R. 45 (which Google), thereby imposing New York City-type forcible disarmament on the entire nation.
This -- because HR45 (like the NYC law it mimics) repeals your Second Amendment rights forever if you visit a shrink professionally even once or are ever prescribed psychotropic drugs including anti-depressants, sleep-aids or attention-deficit medications -- will instantly reduce the nation’s legal firearms ownership by at least 60 percent. It will also satisfy the authoritarian pacifists -- by far the dominant faction of the U.S. “Left” -- sufficiently to make Obama again their cult hero just as he was during the election campaign.
As for the rest of us -- organized labor, socialists, left-libertarians -- we will again be as hopelessly isolated (and thus disempowered) as we were by the class-hatreds unleashed by the Vietnam War. Thus will Obama complete his service to his ruling-class masters.
Which will provide the ultimate teachable moment of U.S. history, when we might learn -- if there were anyone to do the teaching -- the bitter truth that makes all such grassroots aphorisms dead right: that whether Democrats or Republicans are in power, the sole purpose of governance at all levels of United States remains exactly the same: the propagation of capitalism -- the absolute protection of the ruling class -- and the total subjugation of all the rest of us.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Teachable Moment (Expanded Version)
Posted by: lorenbliss
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ErHoff on May 27, 2009 5:48 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
America is no longer about laws, preserving fairness and human rights. It is about branding, branding of the President, Vice President, Congress and Senate for sale.
I sadly feel American are not going to wake up and take back their country. They didn't even know who was running in the last election! The Democratic Party is just a wing of the Republican greed machine, but the voters were to high on media bullshit to know.
OBAMA will kill American citizens by sending them to die in illegal wars, because it serves the profits of his corporate masters, just like the criminal Bush before him.
Uncle Tom Obama is a real disgrace to those that voted for him, he promised change and gave them more deaths and debts.
The war on terror was a was of terror against the many Americans afflicted by irrational fears. Obama should have been bringing the war criminals of the last administration to justice instead of helping mass-murders like the Cheney-Bush Crime Syndicate escape justice. I am ashamed to be an American.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: SADLY, I THINK HE WILL --"Omnes relinquite spes, o vos intrantes".
Posted by: joeocho88
» UNCLE OBAMA WILL TELL CHENEY'S BUDDIES WHERE TO GO TAKE A FLYIN...
Posted by: kanekoa64
Comments are closed-
Posted by: YogiBear on May 27, 2009 6:16 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bonapartist on May 27, 2009 6:18 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That might be faux folksy wisdom but at the same time it is bloody accurate. I think simplifying the issues is necessary to an extent to carry the message accross. Get bogged down in flowery talk and extensive discussion and the issue will get muddled. The murkier it gets, it is less likely that people will move. Hence the extensive arguments about, for example, the finer points of Obama's bailout. Good luck trying to catch all the threads, just call it garbage that it is and move forth.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Faux folksy wisdom?
Posted by: aichbe
» RE: Faux folksy wisdom?
Posted by: bonapartist
Comments are closed-
Posted by: abusedbypenguins on May 27, 2009 7:22 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: CANADA is NO HAVEN ANYMORE
Posted by: joeocho88
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on May 28, 2009 7:06 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Put up or shut up.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kanekoa64 on May 28, 2009 11:04 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mix in tiny amounts of factual information to make your lies seem credible.
The results speak for themselves.
The economy is doing a slow rise from the depths of Republican hubris and greed and there's nothing you can do about it. Obama's the one pulling it off and that pisses you off because you supported Bush and Cheney for eight years and you want Obama to fail. That way you can say, "See? He's just as bad as they were!" Well, he isn't. Not by a long shot.
The increase in Homeless People nationwide is not only because of the economy, but because Republicans are actually COUNTING them now, instead of IGNORING AND BERATING THEM, because it serves their own ends. Padding numbers and repeating them until your Neck Turns RED doesn't make you less culpable for your endorsement of the criminal administration that set the task before Obama of righting our nation.
Even if he solved the whole f-cked up mess overnight, you'd STILL find a way to turn him into the AntiChrist and blame him for a national emergency he didn't create. If he makes headway, you credit yourselves for "Thwarting His Efforts To Destroy America!" So go ahead, make "ironic" change comments and invoke Dante's Inferno, thinking it makes your thin fiction more ominous and foreboding, when it only makes your commentary appear to be a parody of itself and you, a person who predicts omnipresent storms and hurricanes no matter what the weather prediction. That way when one eventually appears, you can make believe you are endowed with the power of clairvoyance.
Your repressed guilt and anger have made you clueless and shameless.
Stand up and be an American instead of pretending Obama and the rest of aren't.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kanekoa64 on May 28, 2009 6:45 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To be distilled down to a simple, two dimensional cartoon, your hopes, dreams and feelings no longer apply, because you have been dehumanized.
It's a miniscule percentage of what I've been putting up with on a day to day basis on this site, as of late.
I regret feeling it necessary to use bait to involve someone in debate and perhaps, I used too big a paint brush for so small a detail job.
Nickle and dime "Sophisticate"? I'm farther South in these United States than you and I'm a country boy myself. I'm truly glad you hug tress, really,
but If you don't get the outrage of being stereotyped by people a lot like you, with a license from GOD to dictate the rules for the rest of us by PROXY along with the added delusion of being in charge of things because of incidental skin color, let me explain why speechlessly confounded turns into outrage when bigoted, selfish individuals feel the need to express anger and fear over having had their fragile sense of superiority challenged by something as simple and historically significant as a Black man being fairly elected to the office of President. So deep seated is the hate and outright fear of loss of control, the vitriolic expression and calls to violent revolution have pushed some of us WAY past the level of patience with ANY attempt at running for the cowardly fallback position of religious license to oppress and using that "down home, countrified regional expressions can be colorful, but it's still free speech," excuse as thin disguises to hide hate and bigotry in lame ass, dated colloquialisms about "Uncle Tom" and "Brer Rabbit".
If my post bothers you, and none of the baited post applies to you,
I can apologize for it's tone as it seems you might actually have a grip on reality that includes the rights and freedoms of others to some degree.
But the "leave us alone" choice to refrain from endorsing the rights of a whole group of Americans, which may even contain members of your own family, can no longer be an acceptable choice. The fact is undeniable that if one group of us is being discriminated against by another, restricting freedoms and denying their rights, then, in ruth, none of us are free, which sets the terrible precedent of a majority rule dictating law.
Would Christians be so quick to press their agenda if they could see a future where Christian ethics no longer apply to the majority of the population and a hopefully unlikely chance of losing the right to express their faith in public? Not if they were smart.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bibsisis on May 28, 2009 8:52 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember, it was George Dumbya Bush who got us into this economic mess with his illegal wars. That's it. The trillions spent on immoral, illegal, pre-emptive irrational wars on countries which did not attack us is the single most guiding force which has caused Americans to lose their jobs, their homes, and companies which hired them to bankrupt.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Grinder on May 29, 2009 10:35 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you was workin'for them Marxist publisher folks, then all I can say is, "Golly, that job musta stank."
Was you a workin' for Faux News or for them good ol' liberal boys down at the Rev. Moon's Washington Times or maybe for that down home Rupert Murdoch fella at the Wall Street Journal? Theyz all sure common folk.
I spent 20 years, 1981-2001, a workin' for newspapers as one of them news reportin' fellas. Them papers was a couple of what Faux News calls MSM major dailies. I only owned me one white shirt and a two ties, one even had gravy on it. In fact, I had to get outa that bidness cause I only owned a them two ties and that one white, socialist shirt. Now I'z in something a called tachicnal writin'. And now because of that damn, tall, kellered, fella my wife and I get a little more money in our paychecks.
Life changes, Buddy. Newspaper folk might have been liberals at the Buford Justice Times, but the right wing has been playing this song for way too long. It's a really weak argument there, Joe.
The reportin' folks I worked with at an actual newspaper, well, some of us leaned politically to the left, while others leaned to the right, and still others leaned to the center. However, some actually leaned to the too weird to even be categorized political arena. The weird leaning folks ones tended to be the best people to work with and were, for some reason,the best reporters. They also were the best people to hang out with after work.A couple of us were actually from south of the Mason Dixon Line.
Almost everyone who publishes(d) a major daily newspaper aligns with that bastion of liberalism and awful-beer product-brewing Coors family or the Scaifes, Buckleys, Moons, etc. As Sarah Palin might say liberal newspaper publishers just ain't there so say it ain't, so, there Joe. It's just a lame-ass, worn-out, tired and old argument.
And most newspapers, left, right, MOR, Marxist socialist, weekly, monthly, etc. are failing and close to death, but it has nothing to do with political ideology. Even that bastion of freedom of speech, Rupert Murdoch, (one page of daily "sports" now, quotes intended, as
in WSJ Editorial Page style) is a killin' himself in the newspaper business. Bad business plans and free Internet, not political ideology or philosophy are the death gong for newspapers. Most of them good 'ol boys who publish a newspaper tend to tilt slightly if not all the way to the right. I know because them left-wingers used to sign my smaller paycheck. You and me, us smart Southern folks,saw the end of newspaper business and knew to move on to other things and better careers. But to throw this left-wing, MSM newspaper stuff to the wall is just batshit.
Thousand year Reich for the Bushes! Liz Cheney rocks! The liberal media is the problem. Where's my chew?
White neck
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: reelman on May 30, 2009 6:49 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
American capitalism gone with a whimper
27.04.2009 Source: Pravda.Ru
It must be said, that like the breaking of a great dam, the American decent into Marxism is happening with breath taking speed, against the back drop of a passive, hapless sheeple, excuse me dear reader, I meant people.
True, the situation has been well prepared on and off for the past century, especially the past twenty years. The initial testing grounds was conducted upon our Holy Russia and a bloody test it was. But we Russians would not just roll over and give up our freedoms and our souls, no matter how much money Wall Street poured into the fists of the Marxists.
Those lessons were taken and used to properly prepare the American populace for the surrender of their freedoms and souls, to the whims of their elites and betters.
First, the population was dumbed down through a politicized and substandard education system based on pop culture, rather then the classics. Americans know more about their favorite TV dramas then the drama in DC that directly affects their lives. They care more for their “right” to choke down a McDonalds burger or a Burger King burger than for their constitutional rights. Then they turn around and lecture us about our rights and about our “democracy”. Pride blind the foolish.
Then their faith in God was destroyed, until their churches, all tens of thousands of different “branches and denominations” were for the most part little more then Sunday circuses and their televangelists and top protestant mega preachers were more then happy to sell out their souls and flocks to be on the “winning” side of one pseudo Marxist politician or another. Their flocks may complain, but when explained that they would be on the “winning” side, their flocks were ever so quick to reject Christ in hopes for earthly power. Even our Holy Orthodox churches are scandalously liberalized in America.
The final collapse has come with the election of Barack Obama. His speed in the past three months has been truly impressive. His spending and money printing has been a record setting, not just in America’s short history but in the world. If this keeps up for more then another year, and there is no sign that it will not, America at best will resemble the Wiemar Republic and at worst Zimbabwe.
These past two weeks have been the most breath taking of all. First came the announcement of a planned redesign of the American Byzantine tax system, by the very thieves who used it to bankroll their thefts, loses and swindles of hundreds of billions of dollars. These make our Russian oligarchs look little more then ordinary street thugs, in comparison. Yes, the Americans have beat our own thieves in the shear volumes. Should we congratulate them?
CRAWFISH NOTE: This post is for ALL those who say year after year that democrats have the right idea…this is from Russia…they know Marxism…there is no argument, no smearing of them, no denial, no spin, no bias, no name-calling, no Republican blame…the experts have now fingered the Democrat Party (Obama-Reid-Pelosi) as Marxists
…not liberals, not progressives, not any other silly term…but MARXISTS. They should be called what they are daily and dealt with accordingly.
http://conservablogs.com/theconservativecrawfish
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: reelman on Jun 1, 2009 5:36 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But he (Obama) stressed: “Democracy, rule of law, freedom of speech, freedom of religion — those are not simply principles of the West to be hoisted on these countries, but rather what I believe to be universal principles that they can embrace and affirm as part of their national identity.”
Obama said he would be “encouraging” countries on his trip to promote these values, but added: “I think the thing that we can do most importantly is serve as a good role model.
CRAWFISH NOTE: Now explain to us dim Americans just how you (Obama) have promoted these values.
By protecting ACORN-Black Panther thugs in the voting-intimidation corruption?
By opposing any voter ID?
By making Czars on his own when we have Congress and gov-meant departments?
By not sealing our borders?
By taking over banks and companies while claiming you are not?
By having stooges plot to destroy talk radio that challenges your secular socialist practices?
By opposing religious freedom by private hospitals to refuse stopping heartbeats in the womb?
Tell us all how you are “embracing and affirming” these principles. We are still waiting. Still waiting.
As the suckers applaud the lying Dufus continues on and on with “newspeak”.
http://conservablogs.com/theconservativecrawfish
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: OBAMA DOES...BUT YOU SAY...
Posted by: kanekoa64
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kwalla on May 27, 2009 12:36 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The hungriest ones eat them.
Posted by: and_abottleofrum
» RE: BY THE TIME THE BUSH'S HOUSEMAN FINISHES THERE MIGHT NOT BE ANYTHING TO EAT,
Posted by: joeocho88
» Are you here to tell potty jokes?
Posted by: freelyb
Comments are closed-
Posted by: spacemarine83 on May 27, 2009 1:16 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For real change, we need real leadership. Not a photo-op. It does not have to from the left or right per se, but should come from someone who can fix the problems, not rely on empty slogans of "hope and change" or the mantras that Bush put down.
Essentially, we need new people in office. People who represent us, not corporate interests and ideals. People who respect the Bill of Rights and our sacred institutions of government that we have to establish greater liberty.
Not welfare enablers or parasites that do not pay in, not big-business enablers who fleece us all.
We need Americans who will stand up to the call of civic service with integrity, something that we have not seen in decades.
Hopefully we can save the Constitutional Republic which we all (both left and right) love so dearly.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Blunt and to the point.
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» The treasury handed off to the Bushanostra cost more!
Posted by: hardwroc
» RE: Blunt and to the point.
Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: Blunt and to the point.
Posted by: aichbe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: davy on May 27, 2009 1:52 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Xpat observer
Posted by: HoboHomo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kanekoa64 on May 27, 2009 2:02 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Somehow, it still makes no mention of Republican responsibility for the limited choices Obama has to make that Right Wingers don't like.
Still, it's a start.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Good Ol' Down Home Wisdom,
Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: ELITIST SNOB MAKES DEMEANING ARGUMENTUM AD HOMINEM
Posted by: joeocho88
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Perry Logan on May 27, 2009 2:41 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the universal refrain of all alienated white guys.
But it just ain't so.
Statistics show very clearly that the poverty rate goes down under Democrats and up under Republicans:
The New Deal lowered the poverty rate from over 50% to around 20%.
Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty reduced the poverty level in the United States to its lowest level ever 11.1 percent in 1973.
Under Bill Clinton, the poverty rate fell from 15.1 percent in 1993 to 12.7 percent in 1998. That was the lowest poverty rate since 1979 and the largest five-year drop in poverty in nearly 30 years (1965-1970).
The African-American poverty rate dropped from 33.1 percent in 1993 to 26.1 percent in 1998 -- the lowest level ever recorded and the largest five-year drop in African-American poverty in more than a quarter century (1967-1972).
The poverty rate for Hispanics fell to the lowest level since 1979, and dropped to 25.6 percent in 1998.
African-American unemployment fell from 14.2 percent in 1992 to 7.3 percent in March 2000 -- the lowest rate on record.
The unemployment rate for Hispanics fell from 11.6 percent in 1992 to 6.3 percent in March 2000 -- and in the last year has been at the lowest rate on record.
For women the unemployment rate was 4.3 percent in March 2000, nearly the lowest since 1953 [when few women sought employment outside the home].
Under President Clinton and Vice President Gore, child poverty declined from 22.7 percent in 1993 to 18.9 percent in 1998 -- the biggest five-year drop in nearly 30 years.
The poverty rate for African-American children fell from 46.1 percent in 1993 to 36.7 percent in 1998 -- the lowest level in 20 years and the biggest five-year drop on record.
The rate also fell for Hispanic children, from 36.8 percent to 34.4 percent - and is now 6.5 percentage points lower than it was in 1993.
Needless to say, the povery rate skyrocketed under Bush II, as it always does under Republicans.
In other words, the difference between the parties is the difference between night and day.
Since this information would make the Democrats look good, the media doesn't report it. That's why truck drivers--along with most Americans--don't know squat about the difference between Democrats and Republicans.
Da Banksta explains everything.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why Americans don't know squat.
Posted by: mcstewey
» RE: IF YOU DON'T LIKE AMERICA, YOU MIGHT BE HAPPIER SOMEWHERE ELSE
Posted by: joeocho88
» RE: IF YOU DON'T LIKE AMERICA, YOU MIGHT BE HAPPIER SOMEWHERE ELSE
Posted by: masthead
» RE: IF YOU DON'T LIKE AMERICA, YOU MIGHT BE HAPPIER SOMEWHERE ELSE
Posted by: adempatriot
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kepstein7777 on May 27, 2009 2:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's the same dumb-ass logic that keeps getting us deeper in this mess: Liberals and/or Democrats are overeducated dreamers and phonies who think too much, so we should all vote Republican. That may not be the direct message of the article, but it's the implication that seems to keep putting idiots and fanatics like Reagan and GWB in office.
We assume that men of action are necessarily better than those who talk and make promises they can't keep. But what kind of action are we talking about? Starting wars? Trashing the economy? Spying on people? Torturing people?...If so, I'd prefer folks like Clinton who chase interns all day, or smooth-talking wordsmiths like Obama.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Fixing it you!
Posted by: ABetterFuture
» Rednecks are Americans
Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: ednecks are Americans
Posted by: HoboHomo
» "spying on people"
Posted by: tjg1984
» RE:dnecks...
Posted by: Tweck9
» RE: dnecks...
Posted by: vetus schola
» RE: dnecks...
Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE:VOTE OUT ALL OF THE ELITISTS!
Posted by: joeocho88
» RE: edneck
Posted by: Bibsisis
» Good point
Posted by: freelyb
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Moonray on May 27, 2009 3:30 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By the way, the word "redneck" has a reverse-racist ring to it. Not to mention that it's condescending. Better to use the term "moron," which can be applied universally, as in "Morons who agree with good-old-boy wisdom often end up voting for Republicans."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Spare us the good old boy crap
Posted by: maryyooch
» RE: Spare us the good old boy crap
Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: "end up voting for Republicans."
Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: NO DEMOCRAT,NO REPUBLICAN, ALL ELITISTS
Posted by: joeocho88
» RE: Spare us the good old boy crap
Posted by: Bibsisis
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PJAW on May 27, 2009 4:13 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I eventually went to school and became a doctor, and now that I've been dealing with insurance companies all my professional life, I'm thinkin' I may have been better off "paintin' houses". At least I got paid for what I did.
As for Obama, I'll be happier when I see more wind mills and feel less hot air.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yup, nothing has changed, or is going to
Posted by: kad
» RE: I remember 'Ol Merle
Posted by: ellie
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Fishbone Soldier on May 27, 2009 4:55 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE:OUR SOUP KITCHENS HERE ARE SO CROWDED THEY RUN OUT OF FOOD
Posted by: joeocho88
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Aimleft on May 27, 2009 5:57 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And by the way, I'm a South Carolina girl, born and bred - who is sick and tired of the willful ignorance that surrounds me.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kanekoa64 on May 27, 2009 6:44 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dun messed up yer hed bone, ah reckon'!
Git away from all them, so-phisteecated, enlightened folks, tryin' to make the world a happy little commune fer tree huggin' and raising spotted owls.
And them thar "love ins" with all them "queers".
It's enough ta make a grown feller downright illafied!
Don't they understayand it's awr planet and theys got to confirm to awr way of lawf, dammit?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kanekoa64 on May 27, 2009 6:44 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dun messed up yer hed bone, ah reckon'!
Git away from all them, so-phisteecated, enlightened folks, tryin' to make the world a happy little commune fer tree huggin' and raising spotted owls.
And them thar "love ins" with all them "queers".
It's enough ta make a grown feller downright illafied!
Don't they understayand it's awr planet and theys got to confirm to awr way of lawf, dammit?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jareilly on May 27, 2009 10:20 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem with a lot of rednecks is that they take special and perverse pride in living DOWN to the stereotype. And one part of the stereotype is the sense of permanent victimhood, of grievance, of hurt pride that rednecks never, EVER seem able to let go. It's the whole theme of your post. Time to get over Appomattox.
Your problem isn't up North. It's right there in the mirror!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: LOOKIT ALL THEM BIGGOTS:
Posted by: jareilly
Comments are closed-
Posted by: joeocho88 on May 28, 2009 12:08 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And because of THEM, we have generations of welfare recipients and unwanted, abused and neglected children born solely to increase the welfare checks and get more free housing because there is NO HELP available for women who do NOT want to bring more misery into the world that they cannot feed...
LIBERALS REALLY ARE FULL OF SELF-HATRED.
Maybe they ought to turn all of this great education towards themselves and see why they are such HYPOCRITES!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: freelyb on May 31, 2009 6:30 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maryyooch on May 27, 2009 5:31 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every time that people use the military arguments, they seem to forget that the ones who completely and premeditatedly avoided the military during war time! Do we need to remind these folks that Cheney, Bush, Rumsfeld, et al all got deferments or had their Daddy's money buy them an excuse not to serve? President Obama was not drafted nor was trying to avoid military service. He wasn't being sneaky or underhanded in the least way, ya know, like the war hawks listed here.
I just don't understand how these rednecks don't see this picture. Especially after they praised McCain for his service and totally tried to kill Sen Kerry for his valour.
I guess it takes a redneck or republican, t totally miss the truth.
And......it's good to see that the President and First Lady are not blind to the plight of the working poor and homeless. As for republicans, they always try and tell you how the homeless like being homeless. And rednecks and their ilk always buy this argument. Makes NO sense what-so-ever!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Military Service & Soup Kitchens
Posted by: Aimleft
» RE: Military Service & Soup Kitchens
Posted by: mtnprivy
» RE: Military Service & Soup Kitchens
Posted by: Texican
» Actually, You're the one who forgot
Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: Military Service
Posted by: rickiey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on May 27, 2009 5:51 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Generally speaking, real rednecks are not the least bit fun, "real" or noble. They are rude, violent types who take pride in being ignorant.
They are arrogant and aggressive. They are blunt, which can be mistaken for honesty but it is not remotely the same thing.
People with "class" may be artificial and pretentious, which is the opposite of rednecks who will blurt out anything on their mind just like a little kid.
I am not the least bit fond of most rednecks. Of course I am not too fond of many people with "class" either. I like being a hermit!
Granny's crazy videos Go get a chuckle!
Luv,
granny
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Having lived in Tennessee
Posted by: rickiey
» RE: Having lived in Tennessee
Posted by: sirios
» I just laughed so hard I peed!
Posted by: Grandma Crabby
» RE: I just laughed so hard I peed!
Posted by: adempatriot
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sausage on May 27, 2009 6:17 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read his stupid book, "Deer Hunting with Jesus" and learned nothing about lower-middle class white males that I already didn't know from working along side them, as Joe Bageant did not for the majority of his adult life.
For the life of me, I don't understand how Bageant's become the darling of the left. All he is selling is the same anti-big government soft soap that reactionary Republicans have peddled to these mostly white, mostly male, mostly small business owners--remodelers, drywallers, independent carpenters, concrete finishers, insurance agents and owners of tiny stores and junkyards--who blame everything and everybody for their misery except those with whom they most want to identify: the CEOs and boardroom executives of Fortune 500 companies.
The reality is that the small shop owner, the handyman, the junkyard owner and so on who are
making between 100 and 50k or less a year
have more in common with the union guys, who Rush Limbaugh tells them is ruining the country, than a guy like an Edward Liddy, out-going CEO of AIG. But since the Joe Bageant "Rednecks" of the world believe they are getting fucked by the IRS, more tax cuts will solve everything! And maybe even put the n*ggers and women back in their place!
Bottom line, the "rednecks" about whom Joe Bageant writes so lovingly are some of the same stupid motherf*ckers who showed up for the April 15 "teabag parties." I'll bet you a dollar that the morons Bageant quoted in the above essay jack off to visions of Sarah Palin dancing in their tiny heads before they drop off to sleep.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I WAS A NEWSPAPER PERSON FOR A WHILE & I DIDN'T MAKE ENOUGH JACK TO RETIRE TO BELIZE
Posted by: joeocho88
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on May 27, 2009 6:17 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There wasn't a scintilla of legality in any of it. IRS doesn't bother with niceties like law - even law like simple fairness. All the government's parasites needed my blood, and if they needed all of it - well, I should just be a good soldier and give his life.
But that's all another story no one wants to hear. "Whining," those of liberal leaning always say. Elsewhere here, I replied to someone who wondered what will happen next. Having lived that for all those who will finance the "bailout" and "affirmative action" for the rich - just another self-serving faction in a deteriorating country, I said:
"Save the constitutional republic . . ." Don't count on it (and it's just good tactics to always have a position to which you can fall back). The shark that was the U.S. collected to many remoras. They've bled him to weakness, and he'll soon die.
We've illegal immigrant-ed, affirmitive action-ed, Title Nine-ed, equal opportunity in housing-ed, and left wing politiced our way to economic and spiritual - fatal - feableness.
As one who saw it coming in a speech I made way back in 1972 - I spoke of the New Feudal Age and the break-up of the U.S. - none of it is a surprise. "Democracy never last long," John Adams said famously (well, that's anywhere that history is studied - certainly not the U.S.). "It always wastes, exhausts, and murders itself."
How's that for being prophetic?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» So, after you were "orphaned" you lived like a feral cat?
Posted by: sausage
» RE: So, after you were "orphaned" you lived like a feral cat?
Posted by: bonapartist
» RE: So, after you were "orphaned" you lived like a feral cat?
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: So, after you were "orphaned" you lived like a feral cat?
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» Hillarious
Posted by: bonapartist
» RE: Hillarious
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: HOW COME NOTHING HAPPENS TO THESE ELITIST POLITICIANS & CRONIES WHO DON'T PAY TAXES
Posted by: joeocho88
» RE: HOW COME NOTHING HAPPENS TO THESE ELITIST POLITICIANS & CRONIES WHO DON'T PAY TAXES
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
Comments are closed-
Posted by: greenman on May 27, 2009 6:28 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bageant's steady refusal to examine our national situation in a serious way, or to do anything other than rip off a series of salty observations from his fellow rednecks doesn't spark too much sympathy. Why should anyone listen to this drivel? And why does Alternet waste our time with Bageant when we could get the same thing from Limbaugh?
Greenman
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE:MAYBE THE PIGS LIMBAUGH KEEPS COMPANY WITH ARE CLEANER
Posted by: joeocho88
» RE: Whiners
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: art guerrilla on May 27, 2009 6:50 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. trying to pin down technical definitions of 'redneck' is silly; there simply ARE quite a few crackers -and some blacks!- who self-identify with the 'redneck lifestyle' and are damn proud of it...
that is MOSTLY slanted towards liking fishin' and huntin' and bbq and beer and babes and country music and dogs and trucks and baseball caps and nascar and plaid and sports and goofin' off...
*not* the more racist, ignorant, violent stereotypes some are trying to portray as being the prevalent brand of redneckism...
having lived in the deep south for a few decades now, having redneck roommates who i went out with muddin' and 4-wheelin' and shootin' over-powered (and illegal) firearms of various calibers, and having been altruistically helped on more than one occasion by an anonymous redneck driving by while i was having vehicle troubles; i would trust your generic 'redneck' over ANY harvard grad, ANY day of the week, and twice on sundays...
2. regardless of one kamper making a technical defense/rebuttal, that 'things' were generally 'better' for po' folks under dem'rat pwesidents than repug pwesidents, is both a relative factoid, and besides the point...
we -the 90% of us at the bottom of the food chain- have been, are being, and will continue to be screwed over by a system that is rigged against us, and to serve the interests of the power elites...
that dem'rats generously let us li'l peeps have 2 cups of cheezy doodles a day, rather than the mean old rethugs letting us have 1 cup of cheezy doodles, is hardly worth jumping up and down about...
art guerrilla
aka ann archy
eof
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: idiculous, do you think if you lived in Iowa or Wisconsin or anywhere
Posted by: art guerrilla
Comments are closed-
» RE: RedNecks [The WANKER above is an Identity Theft Spammer
Posted by: Squarehead
Comments are closed-
Posted by: frankly1 on May 27, 2009 7:24 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. We don't have to worry about the environment as god is making us a new planet.
2. We have all the oil we need, we're just saving it for when everyone else has run out.
Surrounded by epsilons?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: edneck=Mental Retardation
Posted by: Lilly
» RE: edneck=Mental Retardation
Posted by: Zeugitai
» RE: edneck=Mental Retardation
Posted by: Borgar
» RE: I PREFER PEOPLE WHO WORK FOR A LIVING TO THOSE WHO STEAL
Posted by: joeocho88
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nikolai on May 27, 2009 7:29 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: American gov't needs to be overhauled
Posted by: HoboHomo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: grindermonkey on May 27, 2009 7:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sandy55 on May 27, 2009 8:11 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One thing keeps sticking in my mind an article I read by an American Redneck that stated if America has all this money for bailouts where was that money and the will to use it when New Orleans needed bailing out? How is that for a redneck racist comment where does it fit in your culture? For me this is blunt and straight shooting while it may be simplistic compared to how complicated the political system has become it seems to have a heart. Perhaps that is what you are missing in defining a red neck they have hearts I could be completely wrong. Thought I would add some outside thought on how it looks from over here.
This part of your country remains devasted lack of help there speaks volumes to the rest us NON Americans? Americans confuse me and I think Americans are confused as there are many things you say you believe but your actions are the oposite of your belief system and often your laws. You don't make any sense to me. So I guess I likely am a redneck.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Lemme go all redneck on your *ss
Posted by: sausage
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ted Voth Jr on May 27, 2009 8:46 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So why do us Rednecks mostly vote against our own best interests?
People with such a Populist appreciation, how do we Leftists talk to em?
You're right, I identify with both groups; I'm a Liberal Okie!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: So Why do us Rednecks Mostly Vote against Our Own Best Interests?
Posted by: kanekoa64
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lilly on May 27, 2009 8:46 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This morning posters have extended their wisdom to Sotomayor, suggesting that as a Hispanic woman she would be more wisely employed cleaning toilets. And, this always-reliable opinion, any minority person has succeeded only because of Affirmative Action preferences.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» And yet we don't dare talk about that, do we?
Posted by: sausage
» RE: ednecks on townhall.com
Posted by: Zeugitai
» RE: I TAKE EXCEPTION TO YOUR STATEMENTS ABOUT MICHELLE AND THE JUDGE CANDIDATE
Posted by: joeocho88
» RE: I TAKE EXCEPTION TO YOUR STATEMENTS ABOUT MICHELLE AND THE JUDGE CANDIDATE
Posted by: joeocho88
» RE: I TAKE EXCEPTION TO YOUR STATEMENTS ABOUT MICHELLE AND THE JUDGE CANDIDATE
Posted by: morticia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bliss Doubt on May 27, 2009 8:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: There was a campaign tee shirt I wanted: NO WAY!
Posted by: kanekoa64
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sirios on May 27, 2009 8:50 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lile on May 27, 2009 9:20 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Bageant's from Virginia...
Posted by: morticia
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on May 27, 2009 9:20 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: edneck, schmedneck
Posted by: HoboHomo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MSharp on May 27, 2009 9:34 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
personality Larry The
Cable Guy has made millions
off of the negative myths
attributed to rural and
lower income whites.
Just as black people are
insulted by the n word
and asians taking offense
at being called overachievers
people who classify themselves
as rednecks should be offended
by the likes of Larry The Cable
Guy.
(To add further insult to injury,
a recent tour of LTCG charged
20.00 per ticket. Redneck prices?)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: BLACK FOLKS HAD STEPNFETCHIT
Posted by: joeocho88
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Southern Gal on May 27, 2009 10:40 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Not All Rednecks Are Alike
Posted by: soulrebeljc
» RE: Not All Rednecks Are Alike
Posted by: Southern Gal
» RE: Not All Rednecks Are Alike
Posted by: adempatriot
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tfinn on May 27, 2009 12:42 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Hiroak on May 27, 2009 1:03 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyway the Union miners wore red scarves to identify themselves and hence the term had its birth. It was transmorgrophied into a negative conotation by the mine management, the Army, the Government, and other assorted scum and has stuck to this day.
The original "Rednecks" stood up for the working man and many died for their bravery. Note: many were black, chinese, native american, mulungeon, and of course poor (re: mine worker) white people.
So I would appreciate it if y'all'd just back up off our ass a bit and rethink what a redneck is.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Redneck an honorable term
Posted by: PJAW
» Thanks but it doesn't matter
Posted by: Hiroak
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cori on May 27, 2009 2:12 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: MY U.S.CONGRESSMEN AND MY REPRESENTATIVE CARE BECAUSE WE COMMUNICATE
Posted by: joeocho88
» No reason to be disappointed in Obama
Posted by: Dboy
» How Deluded & Fickle... Where Have You Been For 10+ Years?
Posted by: kanekoa64
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jejer on May 27, 2009 4:16 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HoboHomo on May 27, 2009 5:08 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Stuffing AND Mounting? Damn Lucky Homosexuals at Your House!
Posted by: kanekoa64
» OOPs RE: Stuffing AND Mounting? Damn Lucky Homosexuals at Your House!
Posted by: kanekoa64
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lorenbliss on May 27, 2009 5:07 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rural folks recognize firearms as vital survival tools -- especially in regions where law-enforcement response times can run up to an hour. Firearms are also as much food-harvesting instruments as hoes, tillers and fishing tackle.
Obama carried the blue-collar U.S. in 2008 largely because he managed to suppress the Democratic Party’s fanatical support for forcible disarmament and compulsory pacifism (and thus mandatory victimhood) that characterized the Democrats' 2000 and 2004 campaigns.
Though now -- as Obama methodically betrays nearly every campaign promise stated or implied -- the validity of the Democrats’ reversal on that matter is increasingly in doubt too.
Hence my prediction: that once the Left’s legitimate outrage at Obama’s ongoing betrayals reaches a crescendo of protest, he will unleash H.R. 45 (which Google), thereby imposing New York City-type forcible disarmament on the entire nation.
This -- because HR45 (like the NYC law it mimics) repeals your Second Amendment rights forever if you visit a shrink professionally even once or are ever prescribed psychotropic drugs including anti-depressants, sleep-aids or attention-deficit medications -- will instantly reduce the nation’s legal firearms ownership by at least 60 percent. It will also satisfy the authoritarian pacifists -- by far the dominant faction of the U.S. “Left” -- sufficiently to make Obama again their cult hero just as he was during the election campaign.
As for the rest of us -- organized labor, socialists, left-libertarians -- we will again be as hopelessly isolated (and thus disempowered) as we were by the class-hatreds unleashed by the Vietnam War. Thus will Obama complete his service to his ruling-class masters.
Which will provide the ultimate teachable moment of U.S. history, when we might learn -- if there were anyone to do the teaching -- the bitter truth that makes all such grassroots aphorisms dead right: that whether Democrats or Republicans are in power, the sole purpose of governance at all levels of United States remains exactly the same: the propagation of capitalism -- the absolute protection of the ruling class -- and the total subjugation of all the rest of us.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Teachable Moment (Expanded Version)
Posted by: lorenbliss
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ErHoff on May 27, 2009 5:48 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
America is no longer about laws, preserving fairness and human rights. It is about branding, branding of the President, Vice President, Congress and Senate for sale.
I sadly feel American are not going to wake up and take back their country. They didn't even know who was running in the last election! The Democratic Party is just a wing of the Republican greed machine, but the voters were to high on media bullshit to know.
OBAMA will kill American citizens by sending them to die in illegal wars, because it serves the profits of his corporate masters, just like the criminal Bush before him.
Uncle Tom Obama is a real disgrace to those that voted for him, he promised change and gave them more deaths and debts.
The war on terror was a was of terror against the many Americans afflicted by irrational fears. Obama should have been bringing the war criminals of the last administration to justice instead of helping mass-murders like the Cheney-Bush Crime Syndicate escape justice. I am ashamed to be an American.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: SADLY, I THINK HE WILL --"Omnes relinquite spes, o vos intrantes".
Posted by: joeocho88
» UNCLE OBAMA WILL TELL CHENEY'S BUDDIES WHERE TO GO TAKE A FLYIN...
Posted by: kanekoa64
Comments are closed-
Posted by: YogiBear on May 27, 2009 6:16 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bonapartist on May 27, 2009 6:18 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That might be faux folksy wisdom but at the same time it is bloody accurate. I think simplifying the issues is necessary to an extent to carry the message accross. Get bogged down in flowery talk and extensive discussion and the issue will get muddled. The murkier it gets, it is less likely that people will move. Hence the extensive arguments about, for example, the finer points of Obama's bailout. Good luck trying to catch all the threads, just call it garbage that it is and move forth.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Faux folksy wisdom?
Posted by: aichbe
» RE: Faux folksy wisdom?
Posted by: bonapartist
Comments are closed-
Posted by: abusedbypenguins on May 27, 2009 7:22 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: CANADA is NO HAVEN ANYMORE
Posted by: joeocho88
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on May 28, 2009 7:06 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Put up or shut up.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kanekoa64 on May 28, 2009 11:04 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mix in tiny amounts of factual information to make your lies seem credible.
The results speak for themselves.
The economy is doing a slow rise from the depths of Republican hubris and greed and there's nothing you can do about it. Obama's the one pulling it off and that pisses you off because you supported Bush and Cheney for eight years and you want Obama to fail. That way you can say, "See? He's just as bad as they were!" Well, he isn't. Not by a long shot.
The increase in Homeless People nationwide is not only because of the economy, but because Republicans are actually COUNTING them now, instead of IGNORING AND BERATING THEM, because it serves their own ends. Padding numbers and repeating them until your Neck Turns RED doesn't make you less culpable for your endorsement of the criminal administration that set the task before Obama of righting our nation.
Even if he solved the whole f-cked up mess overnight, you'd STILL find a way to turn him into the AntiChrist and blame him for a national emergency he didn't create. If he makes headway, you credit yourselves for "Thwarting His Efforts To Destroy America!" So go ahead, make "ironic" change comments and invoke Dante's Inferno, thinking it makes your thin fiction more ominous and foreboding, when it only makes your commentary appear to be a parody of itself and you, a person who predicts omnipresent storms and hurricanes no matter what the weather prediction. That way when one eventually appears, you can make believe you are endowed with the power of clairvoyance.
Your repressed guilt and anger have made you clueless and shameless.
Stand up and be an American instead of pretending Obama and the rest of aren't.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kanekoa64 on May 28, 2009 6:45 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To be distilled down to a simple, two dimensional cartoon, your hopes, dreams and feelings no longer apply, because you have been dehumanized.
It's a miniscule percentage of what I've been putting up with on a day to day basis on this site, as of late.
I regret feeling it necessary to use bait to involve someone in debate and perhaps, I used too big a paint brush for so small a detail job.
Nickle and dime "Sophisticate"? I'm farther South in these United States than you and I'm a country boy myself. I'm truly glad you hug tress, really,
but If you don't get the outrage of being stereotyped by people a lot like you, with a license from GOD to dictate the rules for the rest of us by PROXY along with the added delusion of being in charge of things because of incidental skin color, let me explain why speechlessly confounded turns into outrage when bigoted, selfish individuals feel the need to express anger and fear over having had their fragile sense of superiority challenged by something as simple and historically significant as a Black man being fairly elected to the office of President. So deep seated is the hate and outright fear of loss of control, the vitriolic expression and calls to violent revolution have pushed some of us WAY past the level of patience with ANY attempt at running for the cowardly fallback position of religious license to oppress and using that "down home, countrified regional expressions can be colorful, but it's still free speech," excuse as thin disguises to hide hate and bigotry in lame ass, dated colloquialisms about "Uncle Tom" and "Brer Rabbit".
If my post bothers you, and none of the baited post applies to you,
I can apologize for it's tone as it seems you might actually have a grip on reality that includes the rights and freedoms of others to some degree.
But the "leave us alone" choice to refrain from endorsing the rights of a whole group of Americans, which may even contain members of your own family, can no longer be an acceptable choice. The fact is undeniable that if one group of us is being discriminated against by another, restricting freedoms and denying their rights, then, in ruth, none of us are free, which sets the terrible precedent of a majority rule dictating law.
Would Christians be so quick to press their agenda if they could see a future where Christian ethics no longer apply to the majority of the population and a hopefully unlikely chance of losing the right to express their faith in public? Not if they were smart.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bibsisis on May 28, 2009 8:52 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember, it was George Dumbya Bush who got us into this economic mess with his illegal wars. That's it. The trillions spent on immoral, illegal, pre-emptive irrational wars on countries which did not attack us is the single most guiding force which has caused Americans to lose their jobs, their homes, and companies which hired them to bankrupt.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Grinder on May 29, 2009 10:35 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you was workin'for them Marxist publisher folks, then all I can say is, "Golly, that job musta stank."
Was you a workin' for Faux News or for them good ol' liberal boys down at the Rev. Moon's Washington Times or maybe for that down home Rupert Murdoch fella at the Wall Street Journal? Theyz all sure common folk.
I spent 20 years, 1981-2001, a workin' for newspapers as one of them news reportin' fellas. Them papers was a couple of what Faux News calls MSM major dailies. I only owned me one white shirt and a two ties, one even had gravy on it. In fact, I had to get outa that bidness cause I only owned a them two ties and that one white, socialist shirt. Now I'z in something a called tachicnal writin'. And now because of that damn, tall, kellered, fella my wife and I get a little more money in our paychecks.
Life changes, Buddy. Newspaper folk might have been liberals at the Buford Justice Times, but the right wing has been playing this song for way too long. It's a really weak argument there, Joe.
The reportin' folks I worked with at an actual newspaper, well, some of us leaned politically to the left, while others leaned to the right, and still others leaned to the center. However, some actually leaned to the too weird to even be categorized political arena. The weird leaning folks ones tended to be the best people to work with and were, for some reason,the best reporters. They also were the best people to hang out with after work.A couple of us were actually from south of the Mason Dixon Line.
Almost everyone who publishes(d) a major daily newspaper aligns with that bastion of liberalism and awful-beer product-brewing Coors family or the Scaifes, Buckleys, Moons, etc. As Sarah Palin might say liberal newspaper publishers just ain't there so say it ain't, so, there Joe. It's just a lame-ass, worn-out, tired and old argument.
And most newspapers, left, right, MOR, Marxist socialist, weekly, monthly, etc. are failing and close to death, but it has nothing to do with political ideology. Even that bastion of freedom of speech, Rupert Murdoch, (one page of daily "sports" now, quotes intended, as
in WSJ Editorial Page style) is a killin' himself in the newspaper business. Bad business plans and free Internet, not political ideology or philosophy are the death gong for newspapers. Most of them good 'ol boys who publish a newspaper tend to tilt slightly if not all the way to the right. I know because them left-wingers used to sign my smaller paycheck. You and me, us smart Southern folks,saw the end of newspaper business and knew to move on to other things and better careers. But to throw this left-wing, MSM newspaper stuff to the wall is just batshit.
Thousand year Reich for the Bushes! Liz Cheney rocks! The liberal media is the problem. Where's my chew?
White neck
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: reelman on May 30, 2009 6:49 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
American capitalism gone with a whimper
27.04.2009 Source: Pravda.Ru
It must be said, that like the breaking of a great dam, the American decent into Marxism is happening with breath taking speed, against the back drop of a passive, hapless sheeple, excuse me dear reader, I meant people.
True, the situation has been well prepared on and off for the past century, especially the past twenty years. The initial testing grounds was conducted upon our Holy Russia and a bloody test it was. But we Russians would not just roll over and give up our freedoms and our souls, no matter how much money Wall Street poured into the fists of the Marxists.
Those lessons were taken and used to properly prepare the American populace for the surrender of their freedoms and souls, to the whims of their elites and betters.
First, the population was dumbed down through a politicized and substandard education system based on pop culture, rather then the classics. Americans know more about their favorite TV dramas then the drama in DC that directly affects their lives. They care more for their “right” to choke down a McDonalds burger or a Burger King burger than for their constitutional rights. Then they turn around and lecture us about our rights and about our “democracy”. Pride blind the foolish.
Then their faith in God was destroyed, until their churches, all tens of thousands of different “branches and denominations” were for the most part little more then Sunday circuses and their televangelists and top protestant mega preachers were more then happy to sell out their souls and flocks to be on the “winning” side of one pseudo Marxist politician or another. Their flocks may complain, but when explained that they would be on the “winning” side, their flocks were ever so quick to reject Christ in hopes for earthly power. Even our Holy Orthodox churches are scandalously liberalized in America.
The final collapse has come with the election of Barack Obama. His speed in the past three months has been truly impressive. His spending and money printing has been a record setting, not just in America’s short history but in the world. If this keeps up for more then another year, and there is no sign that it will not, America at best will resemble the Wiemar Republic and at worst Zimbabwe.
These past two weeks have been the most breath taking of all. First came the announcement of a planned redesign of the American Byzantine tax system, by the very thieves who used it to bankroll their thefts, loses and swindles of hundreds of billions of dollars. These make our Russian oligarchs look little more then ordinary street thugs, in comparison. Yes, the Americans have beat our own thieves in the shear volumes. Should we congratulate them?
CRAWFISH NOTE: This post is for ALL those who say year after year that democrats have the right idea…this is from Russia…they know Marxism…there is no argument, no smearing of them, no denial, no spin, no bias, no name-calling, no Republican blame…the experts have now fingered the Democrat Party (Obama-Reid-Pelosi) as Marxists
…not liberals, not progressives, not any other silly term…but MARXISTS. They should be called what they are daily and dealt with accordingly.
http://conservablogs.com/theconservativecrawfish
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: reelman on Jun 1, 2009 5:36 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But he (Obama) stressed: “Democracy, rule of law, freedom of speech, freedom of religion — those are not simply principles of the West to be hoisted on these countries, but rather what I believe to be universal principles that they can embrace and affirm as part of their national identity.”
Obama said he would be “encouraging” countries on his trip to promote these values, but added: “I think the thing that we can do most importantly is serve as a good role model.
CRAWFISH NOTE: Now explain to us dim Americans just how you (Obama) have promoted these values.
By protecting ACORN-Black Panther thugs in the voting-intimidation corruption?
By opposing any voter ID?
By making Czars on his own when we have Congress and gov-meant departments?
By not sealing our borders?
By taking over banks and companies while claiming you are not?
By having stooges plot to destroy talk radio that challenges your secular socialist practices?
By opposing religious freedom by private hospitals to refuse stopping heartbeats in the womb?
Tell us all how you are “embracing and affirming” these principles. We are still waiting. Still waiting.
As the suckers applaud the lying Dufus continues on and on with “newspeak”.
http://conservablogs.com/theconservativecrawfish
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: OBAMA DOES...BUT YOU SAY...
Posted by: kanekoa64
When Will Obama Stop Trying to Work with Republicans?
Sarah Palin Aims to Bust Up the Republican Party -- And the Tea Party Movement
White Racial Resentment Bubbles Under the Surface of the Tea Party Movement




