Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Movie Mix

WALL-E: A World Without Us

By Michael Dudley, City States. Posted July 1, 2008.


Stores are overfilling with WALL-E merchandise that will soon clog our landfills. Yet this new Disney movie bills itself as pro-environment.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Alan Weisman's recent book The World Without Us carries out a fascinating thought experiment, absenting us from the planet and then taking us through decades and centuries into the far future to see what befalls the works of humans. We watch as our cities and infrastructure crumble before the forces of insects, microbes, plants and rust and discover that our most lasting legacies are not our great works of art and literature, but our trash, our chemical and radioactive pollution and our television and radio broadcasts. The reader is left both humbled and awed at the uncontainable power of nature.

In Pixar's latest outing, WALL-E, the viewer is also treated to a vision of the far future, but is left instead with an unjustified faith in humanity but no real appreciation for or understanding of the natural world.

When the film starts the world has been without us for over 700 years, and all that remains are desolate cities and a planet covered in unimaginably massive piles of trash. The only activity we see is that of a lone robot named WALL-E (an acronym for Waste Allocation Load Lifter -- Earth-Class), the last of an army left behind by the Buy 'n Large corporation to clean up the planet while humanity vacations on its corporate cruise starships far off in space.

The opening sequences of the film are breathtakingly ghastly, like no post-apocalyptic vision ever put on film. The cityscape is not just deserted, it is disappearing under a cancerous envelope of debris, and even orbital space is a cloud of satellites and junk. And everywhere we see the entity responsible for most of the despoliation: the Buy 'n Large Corporation, which appears, in the final stages of humanity's days on Earth, to have owned and run absolutely everything, making Wal-Mart look like a dime store operation in comparison.

Amid this ravaged world, WALL-E fills his days compacting and piling trash, but also collecting and relishing objects that delight and mystify him: egg beaters, Rubik's cubes and a television with which he watches Hello Dolly! over and over again.

His centuries of routine are disrupted when he finds a tiny green plant. Then a gigantic spaceship deposits the egg-shaped EVE (or the Extraterrestrial Vegetation Evaluator) robot, which proceeds to scan the city -- and when things surprise or annoy her, blow them up. WALL-E is smitten by her lethal charms, and when he shows her the plant, she immediately scoops it into herself and shuts down, awaiting recovery and return.

EVE's mission, it turns out, was at the command of the Buy 'n Large corporation, and the ship that picks her up (and to which WALL-E clings in a bid to rescue her) delivers them to the Axiom, one of the gigantic cruise ships launched centuries before.

Unsurprisingly, given that Buy 'n Large (BnL) is still our dominant institution, humans have learned absolutely nothing from their experience as environmental refugees. The Axiom is populated by identically-dressed and morbidly obese humans carried about on multi-media hoverchairs, their every desire met by a fleet of robots and the omnipresent BnL, which exhorts them to continue to consume every waking hour. And of course, the unceasing consumption continues to produce vast amounts of trash, which is regularly compacted and expunged from the ship.

But through his efforts to rescue EVE, WALL-E gradually disrupts the consumerist and media-soaked ecology of the Axiom. Deprived of their non-stop multimedia two of the humans begin responding to their environment as if for the first time -- appreciating beauty, taking physical enjoyment from a previously neglected pool and actually conversing with each other.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: environment, corporations, consumerism, wall-e

Michael Dudley is a research associate at the Institute of Urban Studies.


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Word
Posted by: synx on Jul 1, 2008 11:12 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Word to that. I couldn't even watch this movie, the conflict of interests in the marketing department totally ruins the message. Over the Hedge had a less rose colored look at the consumer society, and even that was total fluff. And why did they have to stick a love story into it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Word Posted by: newtype_alpha
forests and trees
Posted by: mweb on Jul 2, 2008 5:11 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ummmm, it's a children's movie. I think they were trying to, you know, make a movie that would appeal to children.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: forests and trees Posted by: Wacre
» RE: forests and trees Posted by: mattcc42
Excedllent
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Jul 3, 2008 8:21 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I must admit that was a very well rounded article. Cool stuff.

JT
Ultimate Anonymity

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Look at the movie for what it is
Posted by: mattcc42 on Jul 3, 2008 11:52 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is a movie, and it is thus a work of art and not something that should be taken as a narrow commentary, as this article has done. It is rather something that presents a view of the world, or in this case the universe. Wall-E passes every qualification to be a great work of Art, and the view it presents is a hopeful one. It shows humans as ignorant, gluttonous, easily amused, but that they are truly happiest when they are actually accomplishing something. The character Wall-E represents the dwindling hope that man kind might make itself into something that is not a pure drain on everything around it. He is innocent, likable, and hard working. When he is reunited with that remains of the human race, he turns on a vehicle that was parked years ago.

My main issues with this article is that it doesn't look at the movie as a work of art, and it sees the movie in a bad light because the parent company is hypocritical. The movie was not made by Disney. It might have been paid for by them, but they did not conceive this film. Just as Virgil critiques the Romans in the state funded Aeneid, Pixar offers a work that criticizes large corporations such as Disney. To say that Wall-E is hypocritical because Disney sponsored it shows ignorance of what the film is. Disney doesn't care what the film says as long as it makes the firm money. The people who made Wall-E know that, and criticize that very attitude. Go after a corporations, use trendy, semi-political works as evidence, but please distinguish between the faults of the corporation and the thing that they are sponsoring.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PS
Posted by: mattcc42 on Jul 3, 2008 11:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But I guess that wouldn't make a very good movie.

Really? An animated chilren's science fiction film wouldn't be very good if it rigidly adhered to the laws of nature?

But seriously the sarcasm underscores the message of this enlightening, well written, and insightful article very well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Must See It !
Posted by: Last Chance on Jul 5, 2008 4:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Wall E" sounds like a new science fiction classic, and a warning to the people of what their cowardly greed is doing to the Earth, themselves and their children, and grandchildren, if any.

The concept is not new. The History Channel and National Geographics each did their own version of an Earth without the human race and they showed on TV for several days apiece -- and I have my own little story: One More Destiny

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I Must See It ! Posted by: HoboHomo
Wall E
Posted by: dadmoffatt on Jul 5, 2008 7:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, despite its space-age context, I see this movie as a kind of old fashioned fairy tale for children, complete with social critique and totally suspicious of adults and the havoc and mess they wreak. Ugly duckling, improbable turnabouts, slapstick, emotional ups and downs. Full of irony that 'humans' have totally used up earth, in part by depleting earth's resources, creating machines to do work, and then leaving all their crap behind -- only to have a machine come to their rescue.

Wall E is very childlike despite his being a robot, and is among the most "emotional" of all the characters. Like in most fairy tales, things are not what they seem, and in speaking w/ my 2 kids after viewing it, they completely grapsed the issue that adults messed up the world and it is left to a child like robot to redeem it.

In Wall E the adults are "aliendated" -- competely insulated from nature, each other, and their own bodily functions until Wall E "takes the blinders off them" literally.

The relationship betw/ Wall E and Eva does not need to be seen as a "love" story - it has all the commitment and passion of a deep friendship between children -- a friendship that is life changing and irrevocable.

And the end leaves open the question of whether it's going to happen again. But we see the adults "re learning" things -- to walk, to interact, etc. -- so hopefully we can re learn to take care of ourselves and our world. And of course our kids can teach us a lot about that.

I know Disney/Pixar are among the forces that in fact are leading us all down the road to ruin, but this film has a good message, it's a good story, and it left my kids talking and thinking about the state of our environment and what it takes to be couragous and make a change. That was a good $20 spent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Scratching the surface
Posted by: justAnEgg on Jul 5, 2008 7:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Michael Dudley misses the point: what WALL-E states is that humankind must face the consequences of its wrongly set fundaments or would die out otherwise. As Axiom's captain said: "I want to live - not to survive", where "living" implies synergy with nature, not abusing her for commercial goals.

That Disney produced the movie is irrelevant.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Big Art
Posted by: bigart on Jul 5, 2008 9:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A leading computer scientist-Ray Kurzweil- predeicts that humanity will be replaced by machines by the middle of this century. The machines, however, will not be second rate garbage organizers, like Wal-e, but, rather, they will have intellects many billion times greater than humanity's. Now there's a movie I'd like to see and something we all better start thinking about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Big f-Art? Posted by: Cathyc
But They Were Clever
Posted by: Gravitas on Jul 5, 2008 9:44 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They made the future humans very fat, capitalizing on fear that obesity is the ultimate expression of human decline. Thus, it is a subtle reinforcement of what we already believe, losing weight will solve our problems. Thus if we just continue on the path of trying to master our own bodies, the rest will fall into place. So we don't need to feel guilty about all the Wall E toys that will end up in landfills or the myraid of other ways we overconsume, or the basic political and economic systems that cause overconsumption in the first place. For those who think I am reading too much into it, I have read on other blogs this movie had a much more blatantly antifat message and was toned down in response to protest.

This does not surprise me. Weight obsession supports consumerism as does yo-yo dieting. This is not the first time a cause has been co-opted in the name of consumerism. Freud's nephew Bernaise came up with the idea of women smoking as an expression of liberation. What is liberating about addiction? By buying Wall E products you are protesting consumption. Use a marketing message that is the very opposite of reality, will sheeple ever really know the difference?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» They? Posted by: Cathyc
Please, no more!
Posted by: Starfall Deception on Jul 5, 2008 4:35 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am so sick of hearing about the political implications of "Wall-E." First, you have wingnuts like Glenn Beck saying it's liberal propoganda, and then you have people like this saying Disney's a hypocrite because they're coming out with toys! Christ! It's a freaking movie! I saw it, it was cute, and it had a good lesson to teach. There is nothing political about it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It is only a movie
Posted by: the great omi on Jul 6, 2008 5:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well said, it is only a movie!!! Robots in outer space chasing each other is ok but the plant shoud die??? Science fiction is not supposed to be real, Star Wars, Star Trek, etc. are not and will never be based on true facts and they should not have to, they are Science Fiction.
My son and I enjoyed it and it has a great message, besides, if Disney and Pixar were not behind it only a handful of people would watch an independent animation film, the more people to see it the better.
And I forgot to mention, as a movie it is an art form, it is not to please everybody, plus, IT IS ONLY A MOVIE!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

for cripes sake...
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Jul 6, 2008 9:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
its a KID'S movie...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Accentuating The Negative"
Posted by: mark on Jul 6, 2008 9:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Should this be Alternet's new motto?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great movie
Posted by: dobermanmacleod on Jul 7, 2008 8:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great Funny Movie 123deals.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

pgb
Posted by: fungus on Jul 7, 2008 7:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's another hit on "Wall-e". It comes across to me as a kind of fable, a morality tale than a film that deals with a complex
vision of humanity's relationship with nature. It is intensely focused on its theme, and the theme seems to be the fate of the human race when we believe that we are the center of the world, and that it is here to meet our needs.
The humans fell into this attitude when they
got into the radical consumerism that made a mess of the planet. They remain trapped in it
on their cruise ship, where everything is set
to satisfy their whims and appetites. One reviewer made the comment that some pampered moviegoers at multiplexes might make a conection between the self serving values that consumer culture is promoting now and the pathetic, nature deprived lives that the cruise ship passengers live. If they do, this film is deeply challenging to the status quo.

I question the idea that it is a bad thing that the humans return to earth to reestablish a life here. It does seem like they are going to try to create a life where their relationship with nature is central. Maybe their attempts to clean up the mess their ancestors made are similar to habitat restoration work that goes on today. People can get the idea idea that we can change our relationship with the planet, and we sure need positive visions right now. A well done tale like this one can help kids and many adults
think deeply about this point.

I do agree with one point that the writer made. It is pretty ludicrous that Disney Corp. is marketing video games and other products based on "Wall-e". Pixar is showing that they can help change people's values and minds in positive ways, while Disney is basically a giant marketing operation. I hope that Pixar can break their relationship with Disney some day. Is anyone from Pixar reading this?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not Surprising
Posted by: EKSwitaj on Jul 8, 2008 11:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the logic of consumer society. Every message, every movement must be subsumed to the promotion of consumption, including anti-consumer messages.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

'It's just a movie' is not appropriate in this forum
Posted by: tlawiv on Jul 9, 2008 10:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alternet is supposed to be a place where people can actually point out the failings and purposeful brainwashing of our citizens by the corporate oligarchy that rules this planet. Comments like 'it's just a movie' don't belong here. All these other problems that get discussed on this website were facilitated by sleepwalking, checked-out, gone-fishing, complacent, compliant, complicit citizens of this country and other well-off bloated nations on this planet. The people that are creating the messages we receive know what they are saying and are saying it on purpose for the desired effects they are receiving in our Pavlov-reacting complacent behaving brains.
The Walt Disney corporation supports Rush Limbaugh and vulgar revisionist history like that 'Path To War' made for tv movie blaming the Clinton Admin for 911, meanwhile, they refused to air any MoveOn ads because they don't support "advocacy advertising".
There are plenty of forums for trivial mindnumbing discussion. Please don't let this be one of them. This review of this movie is rich social commentary and if you disagree with it, then make an intelligent, reasoned argument disagreeing with the points of discussion. 'It's just a movie' is for the braindead zombies that perpetuate this erosion of our nation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]